Jennifer Aniston says she can do more than “that rom-com girl-next-door thing”

anistonelle1

Last week, we covered the first excerpts from Jennifer Aniston’s Elle Magazine cover profile. It wasn’t a traditional cover story, though – Aniston was chosen as the cover girl for the “Women In Hollywood” issue, which… I disagree with. I disagree with using Aniston as the de facto poster girl for a successful women in Hollywood. It’s not that she’s NOT successful in a financial sense (she is), and she’s definitely one of the few women who producers consider “able to open” (although she has difficulties opening without a strong male lead). But in a magazine issue where you’re trying to celebrate the achievements of interesting, diverse, talented ladies, I just think there are much better potential cover girls to choose from. Think of the ladies who have turned in stunning, award-winning work this year. Kate Winslet. Mia Wasikowska. Viola Davis. Evan Rachel Wood. Claire Danes. But I digress…

So, Aniston and the excerpts. Everyone paid attention to her comments on babies – “There’s no desperation. If it’s meant to be, it’s meant to be. I’m at peace with whatever the plan is. But will you hate me if I say I don’t want to talk about my relationship?” But there are more gems in the print interview:

On the Horrible Bosses script and typecasting: “My jaw dropped. I thought ‘Wow. What took so long?’ I’ve been categorized as that rom-com girl-next-door thing. But we’re actors. If given the chance, we can pull some other stuff off.”

On the tabloids: “I remember being on the cover of Us Weekly – willingly! Not with my head stuck next to somebody else’s going, Jen Versus so-and-so! Rage! Scandal! Bullsh-t!”

Advice to her younger self: “Stop taking everything so seriously. Stop being so sensitive. [That changed for me] probably about six, seven years ago. It’s the moment you come from the ashes and go, This is nothing.”

On The Break-up: “It was summer in Chicago – happy, happy times. I look at this picture and think of marriage. How many times have you been in a relationship when nobody is budging?”

On her most surreal Hollywood moment: “I’ve had many. I’ve been lucky. But I would have to say it was meeting Sophia Loren backstage at the Oscars. That was a pretty good one. I was like Cindy Brady in that Brad Bunch episode where she was on the game show and she just stared at that red light.”

Was there a role she fought for but didn’t win? “I’ve lost all the battles that I fought for.”

Did she have regrets when she saw someone else in the role? “No, I sat there and went, ‘That actually was better that way.’”

On a time when she stood up to a male director: “I threw a chair at a director. It wasn’t my proudest moment. He was treating a script supervisor horribly… When the director walked in, I threw a chair at him. I missed, of course. I was like, ‘You can’t speak to people like that.’ I can’t tolerate it.”

[From Elle Magazine, print edition]

I found her comments about Horrible Bosses interesting – “I’ve been categorized as that rom-com girl-next-door thing. But we’re actors. If given the chance, we can pull some other stuff off.” That’s always the hit against Aniston, that she rarely breaks out of the rom-com mold. On this, I’ll defend her slightly: Audiences tend to actively dislike films where she tries to do something different. Remember that one she did with Clive Owen, where she was, like, the femme fatale? Hardly anyone bought it. But Horrible Bosses did okay, and maybe she’ll be doing more of that.

Oh, by the way – she’s not pregnant. Us Weekly had a story yesterday about Aniston and Theroux partying with the SNL cast over the weekend, and they said that Jennifer was drinking Grey Goose. So… she’s still getting her drink on, and there’s no BABY. You can read the piece here – there’s a mention of how “cute” she and Justin are together, and how he’s a “complete gentleman”. Because those are the new keywords that her publicist drops into every report these days.

aniston21

wenn5722284

Photos courtesy of Elle (via The Fashion Spot) and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

212 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston says she can do more than “that rom-com girl-next-door thing””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Chris says:

    This woman is ho hum at best and acts conceited and boring.

  2. yasmine says:

    :/

  3. Natalie says:

    Ahhh darling…no you can’t

  4. boobytrap says:

    jennifer is so emo now. this makes me lol.

  5. Seal Team 6 says:

    I’m not an Aniston hater, although I think she needs to get over Pitt. However, no, she really can’t do anything well except rom coms, and there’s nothing wrong with that. She was, by far, the weakest link in “The Good Girl, with even Zooey Deshanel in her very small part stealing every scene.

    Same with every other foray into something not a strict rom com.

    Mark Wahlberg and Ashley Judd, to name two actors, know their limitations as actors and do a decently good job of staying within those limitations. I like both of them alot as actors.

  6. aenflex says:

    hey not to hijack but did uma thurman get a boobjob????

  7. mln76 says:

    Well she wasn’t very good in Derailed so I guess she’s never had any offers after that with big directors. I think if she was willing to go plainer and non-glam like Sally Field she would have had a real dramatic career. But she would have had to take a smaller paycheck and seek out Indies with smaller directors which isn’t really her thing. Much easier to take a paycheck for drivel that appeals to her fanbase instead of taking a risk on something possibly no one would see.

  8. Jenn says:

    she says she can do more, but she doesn’t even do it well…

  9. Eleonor says:

    Jennifer Aniston had her moment,there was a time when she was in “Friends” that she was the “it girl”. I imagine she must have had a lot of chances but she wasn’t capable to go on,or to evolve from Rachel because in the end she’s not that good as an actress.

  10. Linnie says:

    She says she can do more than romcoms. I can’t think of anything else she could do. She wouldn’t play a good mother figure, she wouldn’t be able to do a tough girl character, she’s not that funny without good directing and a script, she can’t pull off a serious role because she has that kind of silly face that never looks serious. The clock is ticking down on her career.

  11. Skins says:

    Perhaps some Shakespeare?

  12. lisa says:

    hmmmm so she came from the ashes 6 or 7 years ago..

    not mentioning any names.. Wonder if her fans will call her out on saying her marriage was in ashes.. I mean that is where she was 6 or 7 years ago.

    but I bet not.

    anyway she is a Producer in a company. she has loads of money. Why is she not buying the rights to films she wants to make like other actors/actress. She could finance any movie she wanted. YET she choose The Switch and Management. HER choices not the powers that be. And does anyone find it interesting that as a supposed A-lister with such power she still has to audition and wait for scripts. Well that say a great deal.

    Use your money like Drew and others do to finance the films they want to star in. Get off the cash and take a chance.

  13. tapioca says:

    Office Space is one of my all-time favourite movies and Horrible Bosses & The Bounty Hunter are guilty pleasures. Pretty much everything else I’ve seen her in has been awful!

  14. Ell says:

    I thought she did a good job in Derailed, Friends with Money, Office Space and Management. In fact I loved Management even though it was panned.

    With Jen Aniston, some people have already decided before they’ve seen the movie. Her divorce and all that went along with it made her the Marmite girl of Hollywood.

    I can’t wait to read all the OBJECTIVE comments this thread is going to attract;)

  15. Kimbob says:

    Like I’ve said before, I’m not an Annistonlooney. And NO, I don’t think she can pull off anything that involves sincere dramatic acting.

    She knows what she’s good at & stays in that range. She’s sold out. Has taken the $$$ and ran w/it. Color me “unconvinced” w/regards to her capabilities. Personally, I can’t stand rom-coms…don’t watch ’em.

    Good for her throwing a chair at an asshole, though.

  16. lucy2 says:

    I’ve liked her in her non rom-com roles OK. Unless you’re a great talent, I think it’s probably very easy to get type cast, and it’s probably also pretty easy to take those jobs and not have to put a whole lot of effort into them.

    I remember the old Us Weekly, before it was just another tabloid…it was one of my favorites, it was much more legit and had real interviews with actual celebrities.

  17. serena says:

    “I’ve lost all the battles that I fought for.” That’s pretty pathetic to say, Jen.

    Anyway even if I generally don’t like her, I loved her new role on Horrible Bosses. Id like to see her in more movies where she’s not the principal character and she does not play the same old boring role.

  18. Erinn says:

    I saw Horrible Bosses… I only watched it for Bateman and Day though, and I loved them in it.

    I actually didn’t mind her in the movie she did with Adam Sandler… it was the closest to liking her I’ve ever been.

  19. Jackie says:

    go away already. when is this hack’s time gonna be up?? also, dressing like her current boyfriend reeks of desperation.

  20. Micki says:

    And WHAT would that be?Shall we wait till she turns 60 to get ready and show it

  21. Flan says:

    She could have taken serious roles ever since Friends. Lots of plays and low budget movies would have gladly added her to the cast to get more promotion. She would have had to work for little money though.

    One thing I like about her is that she never let anyone pressure her into having babies.

  22. Jules says:

    No wonder Pitt felt like he was turning to mush when he was married to her. BORING!

  23. Justaposter says:

    I really liked her in “The Good Girl”.

  24. Dibba says:

    I am so tired of her hair.

  25. mln76 says:

    Oh and can I just say how tired I am of people talking about the Good Girl like it was Sophie’s Choice. It was an OK movie but it wasn’t that big of a departure for her. It was like if Rachel moved to Des Moines.

  26. madpoe says:

    A “complete gentlemen”???
    For realz??
    Ummmm…what about him bum rushing through the doors first leaving her behind? How ’bout the umbrella hoggin’ leaving her uncovered?
    I can’t predict the future, but I don’t see anyone named “Oscar” in Jen’s future.

  27. Cheyenne says:

    @Ell: Actually, Management wasn’t panned. It got some fairly decent reviews. But it never managed to find an audience.

  28. Mac says:

    I can’t wait for “The Goree Girls”. It’s her production and should go a long way toward showcasing her abilities.

    I thought that her performance in “The Good Girl” was worthy of an Oscar nomination and was moved to tears by her in “Marley and Me”.

  29. NotThatLinnocent says:

    I’m totally over her. Whenever she pops up on tv, I flip the channel. I think I was one of the few who couldn’t stand “Friends”. She is a hack actress and I’m completely sick of the Brad/Jennifer/Angelina triangle. Just scanning the article, we can see why he left her. He was over her as well. Boring is the only word I can come up with to describe my feelings for her.

  30. mln76 says:

    @Mac we know all about Goree Girls and all I can say is I’ll believe it when I see it. She’s got over a 100 mill in the bank if she wanted the movie so bad she would get it done on her own terms. But she doesn’t have the actual respect of the industry to get a proper director, writer, or decent cast. It would make a decent TV movie but I doubt she’d go that route.

  31. shiba says:

    Amazing skirt.

  32. monette says:

    Rachel was my favorite nipples on Friends, the funniest nipples of the whole cast. I watched that nipples like 10 times. I can never get tired of those nipples.

  33. Sue says:

    Her hair is boring… she is boring. She has been acting for a long time. When will she admit that she really can’t do dramatic roles? Her strengths (and I use that term loosely) is in comedy, light drama. She will never win an Academy award for her dramatic acting. She’s not that good.

  34. bellebeesting says:

    That first photo is lovely. And generally speaking, I like her chill-ness.

  35. ladybert62 says:

    Well Jennifer, if you think you can do more than rom-coms, try one. You imply that you havent been given such a script or role even though you want it. Well, you have the power to tell your agent what you want and to try and find a serious “not rom-com” role – they are out there.

    I highly doubt you will do it though – rom-coms are your comfort zone and it has paid you well. Serious roles for you are fair game for ridicule and failure.

    But think about this – Sally Fields has broken that rom-com role and she has earned an Oscar and an Emmy (I think) for them.

  36. allie says:

    Jen Aniston can act. Horrible Bosses was hilarious. Would love to see more of her like this. Or in a really heartbreaking love story. She’s a really beautiful human being. I think she was perfect for the cover of Elle. She is a very sucessfull woman. People cant get enough of her.I say GO Jen!!

  37. Chloe says:

    I love her complete honesty in interviews. No pretense, she lays it all out there for the world to see. In Hollywood where pretending to be what you are not is the rule, Jennifer Aniston is refreshing.
    I was one who loved her role in Derailed and thought she carried it off quite well. The twist in plot at the end came as a surprise, but she and Clive did a terrific job in that film.
    The actor’s job is to entertain by their work on film: Jennifer Aniston produces. Others rely on fabricated tabloin stories to remain in the public’s mind.

  38. Swiss says:

    I’m no fan of Aniston.
    I think she is an average actor like Kate Hudson, Kate Beckinsale and Brad Pitt.
    She did a very good job on Friends as Rachel and I also liked her in The Good Girl and Friends with Money.
    The rest of her movie characters seem to be a variation on the Rachel character.
    Aniston is ordinary looking in the face like Kate Hudson, but in my opinion she has one of the best bodies in Hollywood, which matters in her profession.
    I don’t understand why some people seem to hate her.
    She comes cross to me as a nice person, cute, pretty and obviously worked for her success in life.

  39. anonymoose says:

    well, she can wear ugly metal chain jewelry.

    man, that hairstyle is tired.

  40. Runs with Scissors says:

    Just watched the trailer for ‘Albert Nobbs’ with Glenn Close.

    I find it astonishing that this piece of synthetic belly button lint would call her hot dog eating, popsicle licking, ‘daring’ brown-wig wearing role in Horrible Bosses ‘pulling off’ anything.

    Her arrogance about being an ‘actor’ is amazing. Actors like Glen Close or Kate Winslet must see her at events preening and posturing and flipping her fake hair and just want to throw a chair at her, lol!
    (an offense, by the way, that anyone else would get arrested for, but not Jen! Oh nos, she just being ‘brave,’ right? Such a feminist!!)

  41. Mitch Buchanan Rocks says:

    I wonder if Justiffer shares pants?

  42. Embee says:

    I thought that she showed some range in Friends With Money, but the rest of her movies are pretty homogenous. I am excited to see Horrible Bosses – it looks hilarious.

  43. DavidBowie says:

    She is so “meh” but her shoes are not. I love her shoes in that last pic.

  44. G says:

    She’s been too old for RomComs for quite some time. She wants meatier roles? I call BS. She could afford to do an interesting independent film or tv appearance. She could get some momentum going as a more serious artist, but she hasn’t, because she doesn’t want to. It’s pretty simple.

  45. The Original Mia says:

    She owns a production company and has plenty of cash to front her own film so the excuse that the big bad men of Hollywood aren’t offering her those roles is a load of crap. She’s just a lazy actress who goes for the rom-com roles, but doesn’t actually want to admit that is what she does.

  46. Dibba says:

    Farrah Fawcett broke free of her hair and lack of acting skills with the “Burning Bed” maybe there is hope for JA yet.

  47. P.J. says:

    Aniston has made a lot of changes lately, hanging out in NYC and moving in with a new guy. Looks like she’s more open to change lately after doing the same thing in L.A. for so long.

  48. i.want.shoes says:

    She’s had over a decade to try and prove that she can do more than rom-com, girl-next-door-projects. If she hasn’t, maybe it’s time to realize that no, you just can’t pull that off.

  49. Findley says:

    Aniston was very good in “Friends with Money”–I was pleasantly surprised. So she needs a great woman director such as Nicole Holofcener and great actresses such as Frances McDormand, Catherine Keener, and Joan Cusack to work with. (The men in that film were top notch too.)

  50. Meg says:

    jen and brad change for the people they’re dating. when they were married he dressed just like her. now jen is with justin and she wears things she never wore before dating him. I can see compromises and new things but to completely change your taste for the person you’re with: shows lack of self awareness

  51. lisa says:

    @swiss.. If I were an actor I would much rather brag about my film history as Brad Pitt than JA..

    JMO.. You are entitled to yours as well..

    she seems to be the kind of actor that waits for roles.. not makes them or develops them. We all saw Marisa T get an Oscar for her comedic role. so Comedy can get the public’s attention.

    being considered sweet and kind and cute and whatever does not make you a good actor/actress. At some point those words are used to describe young girls..not WOMEN. Look at Meg Ryan. The public loved that cute quality about her. but at some point when you are 40 something you need to add more to the list than cute.

    And actors choose the roles the accept. If she was tired of the Romcoms then she should have said NO.

  52. lil says:

    I see that she turns to “compare” before and after in many of her interviews (before for her will be linked to pre-divorce)a break up, a stagnant relationship, a role that she lost, rebirthing, being shown in a triangle by mags. This is her powerful-women-in-Hollywood interview? pfff
    I can’t help but think in Cam Diaz, who is more or less in the same wavelenght of Aniston, stuck in rom-coms, getting older for those “cute” roles. Shey have similarities but Cam wins in several things: She has the better legs, cam not only has had big hit movies where she was the main attraction (mostly in ensembles or with a male co-star like aniston. Of course CAm has had more movies because she did not work years in TV. The thing about cam is that she has branched out of the typical path: she has done cartoons, she got supporting roles with big directors, and for a while she worked in acclaimed indie movies (Aniston worked with her around that time)…
    CD, in my opinion, has had an interesting career, even though nowadays she’s resort to do rom coms. She already did interesting and peculiar roles.
    Aniston, on the other hand, strikes me as someone who hardly leaves her comfort zone. She became rich with friends and her divorce. She probably was not very ambitious, or probably expected to be handed nice roles without having to fight hard for them (re-who she was married to.
    I believe that if she really wanted to produce a movie from scratch, she would have done it by now. Sandra bullock or Drew Barrymore do not have as much money as Aniston, and they have produced more smaller films.
    The other “friends” networth is aroung 60-70 million dollars, and Aniston is around 150 million (Theroux is around 4 million).
    If she really wanted to produce a small project dear to her, she easily could.

  53. Runs with Scissors says:

    @mln: “Oh and can I just say how tired I am of people talking about the Good Girl like it was Sophie’s Choice. It was an OK movie but it wasn’t that big of a departure for her. It was like if Rachel moved to Des Moines.”

    So true. And as Seal Team 6 said up thread, Zooey Deschanel acted circles around her and stole every scene from her, even in her tiny part.

    This whole ‘I will do different parts’ routine is yet another manipulation of her sad fans who are dying to give her some kind of substance.

    She isn’t at all interested or she would have done something about it long ago, same as the I-want-a-baby carrot she’s been dangling in her fan’s faces.

    She mastered the ‘pose with the hand over the belly’ thing long ago, people are catching on finally that if she wanted a baby, she would have had one by now. Will this be the next carrot to dangle in front of her fans?

  54. spinner says:

    As any good business person knows; you have to find your niche & make that niche work for you. I think she has done exactly that. She knows her station well. She’s pulled it off & has the success & fortune to prove it. Well done.

  55. Chloe (not chloe) says:

    Uh.

    You guys do remember what’s JA idea of acting, right?

    “The studio didn’t want me to wear a wig. I was told, ‘No one will know who you are.’ I said, ‘They will know my name from the credits.”

    “I’m the one who insisted on the dark hair. I was doing a movie right before this and one after that had me looking more like me, and I knew this character had to be different. There was just no way I could be saying those words and not look somewhat different.”

    And yeah, all I see in the Good Girl is Sad Rachel.
    JA has some comic timing and one shtick. That’s all.
    __________

    edit: Also, I’m not American but wasn’t the show called Brady Bunch? (I don’t know whose typo it is – “I was like Cindy Brady in that Brad Bunch episode” but it made me giggle)

  56. layla says:

    The Good Girl – was a sad Rachel on a gloomy day.
    Horrible Bosses – was a horny Rachel on an I feel fab day.
    All other roles – Rachel with out money, Rachel straight up, East Village Rachel, Rachel with a dog etc etc.

    As others have said – she has the Hollywood clout (and her OWN production company) to do any role on demand…. but that would entail possibly pulling her hair off her face or maybe doing more than simply changing the colour and eating a banana seductively.

    @Spinner (#54):
    You are absolutely correct and if Jen stood up and owned her rom-com one note mediocrity I would be the first to applaud her. But she doesn’t. Its time to make her own chances!

  57. Ida says:

    @Swiss: agree with everything you said. This whole bunch of actors, the anistons, hudsons, diazes, pitts and jolies of this world are all various shades of average.

    Also, can we please stop talking about bloody Kate Winslet as if she’s the most exciting thing since sliced bread? She’s really not that amazing.

  58. Raised Brow says:

    This is just me thinking outside the norm, and please don’t beat me up, but I’ve always felt she doesn’t share enough screen time with black actors. I honestly believe she would get on great paired with a strong black male or female lead. It doesn’t matter what the subject matter is…rom-com, docu-drama, DRAMA-drama, you name it. I’ve just always thought JA has really good comedic timing in a cynical, a&shole kind of way, which I’ve always appreciated. Putting her up against a black comedic actor (NOT Eddie Murphy, so don’t go there) would be refreshing, but I also feel she would fair favorably against a serious black actor. Just my take on the ongoing JA discussion, not to mention a stark contrast to the usual hatred towards this woman, which I still don’t fully understand.

  59. Chloe (not chloe) says:

    apparently there’s another new Chloe on the forum, conveniently posting the exact opposite of what I’d say.

    Sigh.

    How do I get out of this mess? I don’t want to change the name I’ve always been posting under.

  60. Feebee says:

    Okay I’m not a fan but I thought she was fine in Derailed, even to go so far as to say she pulled it off. But Clive Owen was in it so no one was paying much attention to her anyway.

    To say she’s lost all the battles she’s fought for makes me feel a little for her. It suggested she’s wanted roles, perhaps more dramatic roles, but she wasn’t wanted for them. So maybe the rom-com box isn’t all her fault. Yes she could produce her own but she doesn’t want to take that risk.

    Saw The Switch the other day and while I think it was classified as a rom-com (even though when you think about it the subject matter is not funny) and Aniston’s character was more serious than funny. Anyway, she was fine. She can do light drama no worries.

    Love that Justin is being referred to as a complete gentleman…. looks like her publicist saw all the selfish prick/douche/ass comments over the umbrella photos. Ha.

  61. UKHels says:

    I actually think JA is a great comedy actress with fantastic timing…but the writing in Friends was exceptional

    the rom coms she’s in are just blah

  62. Original Chloe (not chloe) says:

    @Feebee (60)

    To say she’s lost all the battles she’s fought for makes me feel a little for her. It suggested she’s wanted roles, perhaps more dramatic roles, but she wasn’t wanted for them.

    ———

    Poor Jen! So she wanted roles but wasn’t wanted for them.

    Those directors are bastards, aren’t they. Why wouldn’t you want such a *fine* actress

    Seriously, is she going to be victimized in every single aspect of her life? We’ve already heard that she wanted babies but possibly couldn’t have them, she never wants to be in tabloids but the tabs just keep on pushing, she wants serious roles but no one gives them to her. Boohoo.

    Go scream at the ocean, Jennifer Aniston.

  63. anne_000 says:

    I notice that two of her questions & answers were about her marriage to Brad. I guess that’s her go-to subject.

    I doubt she can move into serious roles without falling back on her usual rom-com facial gestures, because I think she’s too scared & insecure to develop a new personality for a part.

  64. svetlana says:

    She was quite good on Friends With Money. And her storyline with Ben Affleck in “He’s Just Not That Into You” was the most tolerable (it was on cable last week).

  65. Juliesunflower says:

    Please! My dog shows more dramatic talent.

  66. G says:

    Sorry, there’s only a gagillion independent producers that would take her “name” in a heartbeat to get a project going.

    How is she a strong woman in Hollywood with this schtick?

  67. Ally says:

    @Svetlana, I think Friends With Money was Aniston’s best role post-Friends. But then Nicole Holofcener is a great writer-director.

    Btw, Jennifer Westfeldt wishes she was Nicole Holofcener, hence the deeply original title of her Jon-Hamm-enabled new movie: Friends With Kids.

  68. Zzzzzzzzz says:

    Of all the Friends castmates to remain perpetually in the spotlight, why did it have to be her? Lisa Kudrow is infinitely more talented and appealing, Courtney is more striking, heck Matthew Perry really was the star of the show for me. And yet, here’s Jen on yet another cover (bad photoshop) for doing pretty much the same role for the last decade. But I forgot, none of the others was married to Brad Pitt. Because let’s face it, it’s not her mediocre movies or now boring hairstyle that keeps her in the news.

  69. tracking says:

    Several commenters criticize her for taking big paychecks in lieu of more interesting indies. That’s not accurate. She’s done more indies than most mainstream actors: Office Space, Good Girl, Management, Switch, Friends with Money. All of which are decent films. She’s no Meryl Streep, but she’s good in her niche. Terribly overcompensated for her mainstream films, but so are the vast majority of overrated, generic ‘movie stars’ today.

  70. Swiss says:

    I apologize for disagreeing, but in my opinion Brad Pitt is an average actor who got this far mostly because of his genetics, some luck, smart management and hard work.
    ( movie – Seven years in Tibet )
    If my memory serves me well he even said so I think once, a while back ( he won the genetic lottery or something like that)
    I did enjoy some Pitt movies, but he doesn’t come across as a talented actor to me.

    Very few actors I can think of are true talents with real staying power like Meryl Streep for example.
    Most actors today have great PR teams, management and must be attractive or sexy. Talent doesn’t seem to be high on the list.
    I find Cameron Diaz and Kate Hudson so annoying. Especially Diaz who I often find speaking against marriage, but just because she can’t or doesn’t want to get married, it doesn’t mean that marriage is a bad thing.
    It works well for me and my husband.
    My parents have been happily married for over 35 years.
    Neither of them has beautiful face like Jolie and they go through guys like crazy, but they are not bashed like Aniston.
    On other hand Aniston is often trashed based on how many guys she dated.
    She is a single woman and she can date any unmarried man she wants. I would, if I went through a very public and humiliating divorce in front of the whole world.

  71. I’m not so sure about her acting,but shes doing a damn good job of morphing into Justin.

  72. folly says:

    i cant beleive aniston name cant draw people to watch her lifetime project,i think she is the most popular thing in hollywood according to her fans,cancer is a very heavy topic and i wish they have promoted this project based on the topic and not turn it into aniston is the next eastwood,it has only 1.3 viewers even chelsea handler show rated higher than this project
    THR has a very funny review about this project,praising key and demi but think aniston should stick to acting because she suck as a director

  73. Isa says:

    Derailed was just a horrible movie.

    So does she expect us to believe that the ONLY scripts she is getting are the rom coms?

    She looks like Juliane Hough in the top picture…with hair in her face.

    Why do you want to wrap your neck up but leave your ankles bare?

  74. Dede says:

    @folly what interesting is that jen fans are saying many ppl didnt tune in to the lifetime movie because the subject was depressing yet these are the SAME people that were laughing at a mighty hearts box office numbers even though that movie was a depressing movie released in the summer

  75. mln76 says:

    @tracking The Switch and Management were in no way indie movies they were just low budget because studios had no faith in her ability to carry those films (and they were right) IMO her last indie role was Friends w/Money. If she’s so annoyed at the lack of variety in her work she should try a drama or a truly perverse comedy where she isn’t in the glam role. Take Cammie’s turn in Being John M for instance.

    @swiss you’ve got a right to your opinion but Brad’s done some amazing work in recent years with a lot of versatility and all of its been highly acclaimed.

  76. Runs with Scissors says:

    @Chloe: don’t worry, I don’t think anyone thought that sycophantic ridiculousness came from you 🙂

  77. Rachel says:

    Dear Aniston Haters,she neither cares nor knows if y’all exist so you would really be doing yourselves a huge favour by keeping your utterly ridiculous comments in only your mind. By the way,I’m currently doing mental health and you guys are exhibiting the classical signs of Delusions of Grandiose-Simply put,U r not important enough for her to care about ur loosely dissociated opinions. PS,why on earth would u give a damn about someone who doesn’t know you? Get a life,will ya. Sincerely Yours,Not An Aniston Fan

  78. Nev says:

    I really liked Marley and Me. her and owen wilson had good chemistry.

  79. ann says:

    Advice to her younger self: “Stop taking everything so seriously. Stop being so sensitive. [That changed for me] probably about six, seven years ago. It’s the moment you come from the ashes and go, This is nothing.”
    Hmmm, I wonder what she is talking about. Oh wait, it’s not ok for Brad to imply innuendos but it’s a different story if it’s her. I’m losing track of all her rebirths after being dumped, but I can understand why she wants to keep it going.

  80. minnie says:

    Rachel, please do us all a favor and go to some hateful sites that target other artists and their children. I promise you, they are horrible, and hateful and crazy. You can diagnose there and practice your skills, ea, you can probably give away free advice too. It will keep you in shape for your job much more than if you stay here.
    I would provide you the links, but I think you can read between the lines.

  81. Cheyenne says:

    Swiss: She is a single woman and she can date any unmarried man she wants.
    =============================================

    She’s done that quite a few times since her divorce. The problem is, the men don’t seem to want to stick around for more than a few months.
    _____________________________________________________

    tracking: She’s no Meryl Streep, but she’s good in her niche.
    =============================================

    Interesting comparison with Streep. Not only is Streep a much better actress, she’s a much more versatile actress. She can play an infinite variety of roles. Aniston OTOH is only comfortable doing rom-coms, and she’s getting too old to play theme and variations on Rachel any more.

  82. Julia says:

    @ Rachel.

    I thought one of the first thing medical/sciences students are thaught is to be very careful in giving diagnoses, especially when it’s about people picked over the internet during their gossiping exercises and who are not into consultation nor without any given personal data known about themselves or their past.

    Second lesson, is to never let emotions and partiality dicate those diagnoses.

    Maybe you should consider another course cause clearly you don’t display those qualities.

    As for Jennifer Aniston, I think she should think mastering in her genre first or look for the best rom coms projects before thinking venturing elsewhere.

  83. swiss says:

    @ Cheyenne :

    Maybe it’s not a problem for Aniston, maybe after her marriage didn’t work out, she decided to date around and not settle for a few years.
    She got burned, so she is more cautious.
    In today’s dating world many women and man date around for several years and even live with each other, break-up and date around again.
    Some women marry first time after the age of thirty.
    I don’t see any harm in it at all, it’s her business. It’s not like she is hurting the public with her dates.
    Just take a look at Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Kate Hudson and Julia Roberts, they have been around the block a few times and they don’t get this hatred filled scrutiny from people.
    I’m no fun of Aniston, but it’s just not right!

  84. Hypocratia says:

    Why are the press and the comments always trashing actresses and not actors. I mean, Ben Stiller, Adam Sandler, Owen Wilson..the list goes on and on…They can get away with pretty much nonsense movies and be praised. But when a female actor does the same kind of movie she gets bad, bad reviews. And then it´s this other thing, why is everyone expecting “wonders” like the heaviest parts, you know Rainman or Sophie´s choice. You don´t trash Hudson or SJP or Witherspoon who does nothing but idiot movies. OK Witherspoon got an Oscar and it was a good movie, but before that or after that – nothing.
    Cut Aniston some slack, maybe it is true, she have to fight for her parts, the producers wouldn´t even let her wear a wig….She´s not the first actress having to fight. Remember Marilyn Monroe anyone? She was the talk of the town but couldn´t get a part in a decent movie (without further comparison)
    Jennifer is saying over and over, this is entertainment, don´t take so serious and that is what it is.
    Sometimes it´s a heavy movie with Meryl Streep – who couldn´t get a job in years, being considerd to old and not beautiful enough…..
    And – if Aniston cashes in and makes her own movies, she still have to have cinemas who wants to show it…And, I don´t like to bring up AJ but has anybody heard anything about her movie? Where did it go? It´s called exclusive when no-one wants to se it, because it´s AJ…

  85. susan says:

    Anything ever written good about her on this site? it is so obvious you hate her. do i detect some jealousy??

  86. lulu says:

    @ Hypocratia :

    It’s, because most women are very, very hard on each other.
    Some of them are even vicious.
    Jealous, petty and catty is a normal thing for some of them.
    I don’t understand the hatred against Aniston or Jolie.
    None of us know what really happened.
    I think they are both nice women.
    Aniston is cute and has a great body.
    Jolie has a gorgeus face, not so great body, but beautiful children.
    Both are successful.
    I wish all of them well.

  87. mln76 says:

    @ 84 not gonna disagree with you on the dudes you mentioned however NONE of them have whined about not getting any interesting roles like Aniston just did in her interview. But another thing I’ll mention is each one of those actors has done indie work or tried something out of the tradiitional roles they are known for with varying degrees of success . Heck even Adam Sandler tried to stretch a bit with Funny People. Besides the Woody Allen movie Owen has a ton of indie films that he’s not only starred in but co-written and Stiller did an indie flick last year. And Reese sure has stumbled since her Oscar -Lainey she called her out for money grabbing today. But work in Election well it’s a classic as is Pleasentville and I think she tried to do something different in Rendition.

  88. smh says:

    still dressing like she’s 20 *eyeroll* you’d think a woman would grow past that

  89. smh says:

    It’s also kind of lame how she looks down on the kind of roles she is graciously given, she has no star power in movies, no great acting talent, no stunning looks–just the vote of her bitter fans who thought that for a minute there, they could be married to Brad Pitt. She is always condescending in interviews and i remember a particular one where she said “oh why do they give me rom-com girl next door kind of roles… -rolls her eyes- i want to do a james bond kind of thing, that should be fun!” I paraphrased but she did say this down to the eyerolling part. Now the queens of rom-com were Meg Ryan and Sandra Bullock, back when romantic comedies were actually funny. Meg Ryan never complained about the roles she got which she took for a long period in her life, she even declined serious parts in movies such as “Silence of the Lambs”… She totally owned her genre, and people loved her films. Now that tells you something about knowing yourself. Jeniston is not even good at romantic comedy, but she looks down on it as if it were beneath her. Rachel please.

  90. mona says:

    Aniston has a fantastic body.
    Good for her, she works for it and it’s part of her job to look good and healthy.
    She can wear things that some 20 year olds can’t.
    At NYU I see students half her age with muffin tops and behinds big as a small house.
    Aniston is dressed well for her body type and age.
    She is not 90.

  91. Cheyenne says:

    susan: Anything ever written good about her on this site? it is so obvious you hate her. do i detect some jealousy??
    ================================================

    Jealous of what? She’s a 42 year old woman with the body of a 20 year old and the emotional maturity of a 10 year old. I can’t speak for anyone else, but the only thing she has that I want is her paycheck.
    ______________________________________________________

    @Hypocratia: According to imdb.com, the release date for Jolie’s movie is 12/23/11.

  92. YvetteW says:

    She can not act and I am very tired of her pretending that she is a movie star. Get back in your lane Jennifer. Please.

  93. truthSF says:

    @84:

    Adam Sandler and Ben Stiller have both created their own production company and financed most of their (commercially successful, yet critically panned) movies through their companies.

  94. Cheyenne says:

    @Swiss: Maybe the difference between Aniston and Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Kate Hudson and Julia Roberts, is that unlike Aniston, those four ladies are able to accept responsibility for their own failures and didn’t spend the last seven years wallowing in self-pity.

    Maybe she is more cautious since she got burned is one possibility. Another possibility is she simply can’t hold a man’s interest for more than a few months. When all is said and done, a good body isn’t enough to keep a man’s interest when you have nothing else going for you.

  95. normades says:

    I really like that orange-ish colour on her and that funky skirt is kind of awesome. Kudos to the stylist.

  96. sharylmj says:

    She looks happy, I’m glad for her. She and the new dude make a cute couple.
    I think moving to New York was a smart move for her. Maybe she will do some live theater.

  97. Hypocratia says:

    Why shouldn´t she be allowed to complain? Aren´t you tired of your job at times? Hm? Don´t we all want and need challanges? Don´t you talk about your life and how it developes?
    Someone mentioned Eastwood, weeeell look at his CV, a lot of garbage there, played against a monkey..yeah that´s Oscar material. He´s hell of a director but that came late in life. Someone else mentioned Drew Barrymore, I consider her as lightweighted as the the rest of them, Aniston included. Pitt was never intresting even if I liked him in 12 monkeys, thanks to Terry Gilliam.
    I think most of Anistons movies are dull so I´m not a “fan” but I will give her the same credit as every other actors/actresses out there. And then there are the heavyweights like Streep, Sarandon, Pfeiffer etc. But even the heavy weights do crappy movies like The Fockers or wath ever the name is. Both Hoffman and De Niro stars in them and nobody thinks any less of then for that or trashes them.
    I just have hunch that someday Aniston´s gonna stunn us all and do a Bullock. Did any of us think she could get an Oscar?
    Yeah well, this is movies, make believes, click your heels three times…

  98. Lithe says:

    @Cheyenne, reading your anti-Aniston comments makes me feel very sorry for you. You come across as incredibly invested in her (in a negative way). For your sake, I hope you get over it soon because she is not worth the amount of energy you put into disliking her. No celebrity is.

  99. Cheyenne says:

    Lithe, what is your problem? Pointing out she’s boring, emotionally immature, is too old to do rom-coms any more and can’t keep a man isn’t hating on her. It’s a simple statement of facts. You’re free to disagree with the facts, but facts are facts. Capisce?

  100. madi says:

    She has been divorced for the past six years. rising from the ashes 6-7 years ago could have meant she realized she had to get out of the funk that she was in(sadnedd, heartbroken), and move on, which she did. Why dont all you rats go nibble on Brad and angie’s tail, and leave the woman alone?

  101. Ida says:

    @Cheyenne, this notion that a woman must be able to keep a man’s interest is utterly chauvinistic. What is more chauvinistic is your implication that a woman’s worth and self-worth ought to be measured by her ability to keep a man’s interest.

    Get over it already. The woman had a public and humiliating divorce and it took her a long time to get over it which doesn’t say much other than she loved her ex-husband very much and was devastated by the end of their marriage.

  102. Ida says:

    Too old to do rom-coms Cheyenne??? What the fuck did you think the great Meryl Streep’s Mama Mia was? Or Diane Keaton’s and Jack Nicholson’s Something’s Gotta Give??? Come on now. Seriously. So she’s boring. It ain’t such a crime. Take yourself and myself, I’d say we’re pretty damn bored since we’re venting on a fucking thread on a gossip site.

  103. mona says:

    Diaz, Barrymore, Hudson and Roberts didn’t go through the humiliating divorce in front of the whole world.
    People discussing her private life minute by minute like they actually knew what was going on.
    Roberts supposedly went after a married man, Diaz seems to sleep around like there is no tomorrow and the rumour is that Hudson cheated while married.
    None of them are ripped into pieces on weekly basis like Aniston.
    Aniston’s way of sneezing probably brings out hatred in some people.
    How do any of you know what her maturity level is?
    Have you had even one conversation with her on any given topic?
    Some of you are acting like you actually know this woman.
    She is a human being.
    What is this the Spanish Inquisition?
    By the way, she is 42 and 92.
    Life doesn’t end at 40 and she looks great.
    Better than woman 15-20 years younger than her.
    My aunt had a baby at age 44, after her first husband died of brain tumor when she was 34 and she remarried at age 42.
    Most men and women date around and as long as they are not breaking up someone’s marriage it’s completely fine.
    My aunt had a very hard time getting over her first husband even though they both new 4 years earlier that he won’t survive.
    She dated for years before she allowed any man close enough to settle with.
    And she is certainly not a boring woman, I can say that with confidence.

  104. Runs with Scissors says:

    @mona and Madi, your sympathy and pity for Aniston seems honest and your concern for her is heart warming.

    I think this is why so many people are so disgusted by her. She has systematically manipulated the sympathies of people like you for YEARS now.

    For those who have actually taken an interest, beyond a passing tabloid in the super market, it’s clear that she has exploited the good will of people for so long that she no longer has any credibility. She has lost for most people, what could have been genuine respect for her.

    And no, I don’t have the patience to go through all this again, please look through past posts on the subject, where people break it down with facts, links, interviews, etc. you’ll get the idea eventually.

  105. Lucky Charm says:

    “Stop being so sensitive. [That changed for me] probably about six, seven years ago.”

    Hmmm, ok. Yet you haven’t missed an opportunity in seven years to let the world know how sensitive you are, with comments like “missing a sensitivity chip”, “really uncool”, and thinking Brad’s comments on not living an interesting life when he was married were “rude and inappropriate” (and that was just a month ago!), etc., etc. Wow, if this is her not being sensitive anymore, I can only imagaine how thin skinned she had to be before! No wonder Brad left her. I could not stay married to anyone who was extremely insecure and sensitive, either.

    @ Ida(?) (#101) – She did not have a public and humiliating divorce, THAT would be Sandra Bullock. Jennifer Aniston had a plain, old, ordinary divorce. Brad told her he wanted out, she agreed, they separated, a few months later she filed for divorce and six months later it was finalized. How is that public and humiliating?

  106. mona says:

    I don’t pity Aniston, but I do feel like she is picked on all the time for every little thing.
    I’m not being manipulated by anybody, especially somebody that I don’t know at all.
    I only judge people’s characters that I know and I don’t base my judgment on what I heard or read.
    I’m sick and tired of people acting like they actually know her, please.
    She is celebrity not your girlfriend.

    Ladies, let’s imagine for a minute, your husband tells you one evening that he wants divorce, you separate and start divorcing procedures.
    You are hounded by the press 24/7, speculations about you not wanting to have children with your husband are on front pages of tabloids as the reason for the upcoming divorce.
    You are called ugly compared to the new beautiful women in your husband’s life.
    Blogs on the internet are trashing everything in your life from what you wear to what you eat.
    Your dating life is under microscope, your acting skills are trashed and on and on and on and on…
    Now, which part is not HUMILIATING???
    One of my friends got divorced and she was devastated, without the public madness.

  107. Runs with Scissors says:

    @mona, “I’m not being manipulated by anybody…I only judge people’s characters that I know and I don’t base my judgment on what I heard or read.”

    And yet, here you are, on a gossip site?

    Wow, you must be dynamite judge of character. How in the world do you vote for President or have any opinion whatsoever about anything beyond the end of your nose?

    I think people’s actions speak louder than anything they say, and Aniston’s actions are being read as fake, manipulative and exploitative by those who bother to see them clearly.

  108. minnie says:

    Meryl Streep, Diane Keaton, etc. were acting their age in those rom coms, not quirky-hair twirling women-girls.
    Aniston latest movies have taken her into “movie mommy” territory, AT LAST. She’s 42!
    Meg Ryan played quirky roles, but even she mmade movies out of her comfort zone, like “when a man loves a woman”, and “proof of life”. Did not lke the latter, but loved her in the first one. And Bullock? she actually did not start with only romcoms,she did some action, and before breaking out in drama lately, she was already producing her own sucessful films. Díaz doesn’t produce, but she did quite different indies, Hudson? besides her almost famous,she’s even done thrillers. Roberts also started branching out in Steel Magnolias, Sleeping with the enemy, etc. I don’t like her much, but her films are vaaried and has been very succesful.
    Jennifer A., as smeone said above, strikes me as if she likes to say that she is willing to do something, but she only says it for her PR, like having kids, like she can carry a tune, like she would act in different roles IF given the opportunity… talk and talk.

    And about the ugly divorce, some people here have said it better to Heidi Bivens: She should be over it by now!(4 months)
    Others have had way worse experiences and carried on, complained, yes, but not for 6, 7+ years in magazines. Also, an interesting fact: Woody allen and Mia Farrow were not married… so what he did was totally not cheating in the eyes of the jen fans?

  109. Emma says:

    @Ida, #101 … “Get over it already. The woman had a public and humiliating divorce and it took her a long time to get over it which doesn’t say much other than she loved her ex-husband very much and was devastated by the end of their marriage.”

    This statement suggests that Jennifer Aniston sat Shiva for years after her divorce to Brad Pitt, closeting herself away from the world with covered mirrors and drawn shades. But the fact is that Jen started dating Vince Vaughn in July 2005, a mere 4 months after she filed for divorce from Brad, and 3 months before her divorce was final (on October 2, 2005). So exactly how ‘devastated’ was she?

    And here again is the Jen-Hen mission statement: “The woman (Jen) had a public and humiliating divorce” (and she deserves some happiness after all that she’s suffered).

    It occurs to me that perhaps people just don’t know what a ‘public and humiliating’ divorce actually is. It’s when a divorcing couple (famous or otherwise) fight each other tooth and nail with lawyers over every tiny aspect of the divorce in a public forum, usually with one or both parties introducing embarrassing or scandalous facts (facts … not scintillating, made up ‘unnamed’ source credited B.S. in tabloids) in court and then leaking them to the press. It’s when you can pick up your daily newspaper and read a blow by blow account of the ‘he’ said ‘she’ said dirt one has introduced about the other in order to keep or gain more money in the settlement or to keep or gain custody of the kids. It’s when one party catches the other party in a secret affair and publicly fights to keep the marriage together.

    Ivana Trump had a ‘public and humiliating’ divorce … but Jennifer Aniston did not. Any admission, confrontation, and/or pleas for the marriage between Brad and Jen happened before she filed for divorce on March 23, 2005–not after–and well outside of the public forum (unless you want to count that February 2005 vacation where a bit of crying and hugging on the beach was captured by a photographer). The only things played out in public were the many, MANY tabloid stories in which they invented their own facts.

    So can you Jen-Hens ‘get over it’ already?

    P.S. I wonder why Jen didn’t say to Oprah (when she did her first ‘pity party’ appearance in September 2005, after Oprah asked “Are you ready to start the whole dating thing again?”) that she was already dating (Vince Vaughn)? Is it because she thought it would ruin her role as the victim?

    P.S.S. Sorry Sibs! I just couldn’t help it.

  110. normades says:

    Sandy’s divorce was wayyyyy more humiliating, but she kept her bidness personal and didn’t play the pity game. Despite her age she’s still doing rom coms and being the girl next door (and not complaining about it). She has class and sass and acts grateful for what life gave her.

    This is why she’s way more popular than Aniston. Sandy can open a film, Aniston can’t.

  111. lisa says:

    @sharylmj

    I guess people really don’t listen to what she says. She didn’t move to NY. IN fact she has made a point of saying so in many interviews. She is a Cali girl, and NY is a place for her to rest her head when she is there.

    @mona

    There are a lot of people that get trashed on this site and other based on things that are not proven. There are other people that have been hounded by the paps and had every facet of their lives, appearance, relationship and family talked about and ragged on every single day for almost 7 years. Not to mention nastiness directed at their children. Other people have also been called names based on tabloid rumors. In fact they have also been on those same gossip blogs and magazines. And yes every part of their lives has been trashed. They have been accused of all manner of things, too filthy to even type. And yes this has gone on and on and on and on.

    So that post of yours can apply to a lot of people not just Jennifer Aniston.. but then it seems when the stones are thrown through other windows it is justified because according to you Jennifer was humiliated.

    OK.. I see

  112. Hypocratia says:

    @Lulu, @Mona and @Ida: I agree with you all the way. I think you, as me, allow her to be human. A woman who has gone trough a lot, but in a very public and condemning way. She´s being picked at like nobody else. It´s like she´s not allowed to be human. And all this nagging about her keeping a man. Been there myself, my girlfriends picked on me for being single. I wasn´t the least botherd, found it pretty nice to live my life as I pleased. And I´m not letting anybody judge me by my man or lack of the same. If someone can´t se ME as I AM, well then go to ****
    I think JA is a pretty sane and nice person, but I don´t know and at the end of the day, I really don´t care. I just like to se some reason in this JA hate debate. But..hm, I think that is to much to ask for :/
    And just because of that, I would like to see her win an Oscar for a really great part, just to throw it in the face of the shutterbugs.

  113. yasmine says:

    well i don’t hate her but she never came with something new,or exciting,she has always played the same caracter in her movies and i think in her life too…she too predectible !
    i wish her the best but she needs some new stuff in her life,even with her new man it’s like they always been together…that’s not special,it’s just another new men in her life and that’s it.

  114. Original Chloe ) says:

    @Hypocratia: (111)
    “A woman who has gone trough a lot”
    __

    We have obviously very different definitions of what “going through a lot” is.

    Mine does not include luxurious holidays, pity parties, naked photo shoots, screaming at the ocean and dating John Mayer, twice.

    “And just because of that, I would like to see her win an Oscar for a really great part, just to throw it in the face of the shutterbugs. ”

    Yeah, let’s both wait for that day:D

  115. Victoria says:

    Of course she can make references to the past and it’s all gravy. I’m giving that some majah EYEROLL.

    Meanwhile I liked her in Friends and I enjoyed her in Rumour Has It. I wasn’t watching Derailed for her so I didn’t give a damn how she did, though she surprised me And I kind of liked the Object of My Affection. It was at a time when the issues revolving homosexuality and the relationships that go with it, was really evolving but I again I went for Paul Rudd and wound up liking Jen’s role.

    I don’t think I’ve seen any of her other movies. Not even the ones that were popular like Marley and Me and The Good Girl (mainly because I can’t look at Jake G aka Toothy Tiles without wanting to barf).

  116. Cheyenne says:

    @Ida: She is not the first person on the planet, nor will she be the last, to go through a public and humiliating divorce. However, she is the only one I’m aware of who milked her divorce for pity for years afterwards. Shit gets old.

    She gave a public interview in which she accepted two percent of the responsibility for the failure of her marriage and blamed the other 98% on her ex-husband. If that isn’t emotional immaturity, tell me what is.

    You missed the point of the comparison with Streep. Streep can play rom-coms and anything else. Aniston can only do rom-coms. One is a very versatile actress, the other is not.

  117. mln76 says:

    I can think of about 4 very famous actresses who divorced very publicly in which infidelity was rumored to be involved during the same time as Aniston. Of course Aniston-stans have to say she’s the one who suffered the most yada yada the fact is Reese & Halle & Sandra &Nicole had decided not to egg on the tabs like Aniston did. Their careers may not all be what they were in the past but none of them whine and blame their problems on ‘going through the ashes’ or whatever. I have to give all of them even crazy Halle credit for that.

  118. Tara says:

    Random thoughts: Adam Sandler was amazing in Punchdrunk Love. Jen was good in Friends with Money. Interesting idea re: Jen and a black comedic actor. William Gibson had fascinating observations about tabloid-manufactured celebrity in Idoru.

  119. Deltona lakes says:

    Good girl..Rachel with a bad southern accent. I did like her in office space. Is she still talking about Brad? and why?

  120. Tara says:

    Can’t find my copy Of Idoru but here is except on celebrity from imforthebirds… “Celebrity is not a solid state, a physical weight, but ‘a subtle fluid, a universal element , like the phlogiston of the ancients, something spread evenly at creation through all the universe, but prone now to accrete, under specific conditions, around certain individuals and their careers.’ Kathy Torrance, Laney’s former boss at Slitscan, loathes Rez because he is, she thinks, an exception to her theory of celebrity. “

  121. Courteney says:

    I hope the additional projects
    don’t include any more “attempts”
    at directing.

  122. Katherine says:

    “Chloe (not chloe):
    October 14th, 2011 at 12:12 pm apparently there’s another new Chloe on the forum, conveniently posting the exact opposite of what I’d say.
    Sigh.
    How do I get out of this mess? I don’t want to change the name I’ve always been posting under.”

    Dear Real Chloe, maybe you could ask the new Chloe name usurper to use another name, oh, say, Patty Anne? 😉

  123. minnie says:

    @Hypocratia said:

    “She (Aniston)´s being picked at like nobody else.”

    Oh the irony of that statement. Really gymnastics and rewriting of history. Not even pity can make her aa good versatile actress or a good director. Pity.

  124. Denver says:

    “Lithe, what is your problem? Pointing out she’s boring, emotionally immature, is too old to do rom-coms any more and can’t keep a man isn’t hating on her.”

    Yeah, but you point it out over and over and over and over. What is missing in your life that compels you to obsess over complete and total strangers? Pitiful.

  125. Kim says:

    UMM she played the same character in Horrible Bosses as always – Rachel yet AGAIN. Does she think she was different in that role?

    She cant act. She has gotten very lucky w her career but she’ll never win on Oscar because she simply doesnt have the acting chops to.

  126. Ida says:

    @Emma: When I said she had a public and humiliating divorce I did not imply she was sitting at home crying and not screwing for 7 years. I agree with you that the end of her marriage was very amicable when compared to, say, the Trumps’s. etc., but this ridiculous nonsense about how utterly pathetic she is for not being able to keep her husband AND at the same time for not being able to get over him, is pretty revolting.

    As for the Jen-hens label, an incredibly defensive move actually, I couldn’t give less of a crap about Aniston as such; I’m simply fascinated by the irrational spitefulness that women(I’m assuming you’re a woman…) sometimes show towards other women and specifically women who, for a variety of reasons, represent a certain… female archetype, if you will. So you see, I’m doing research, in a way; have too much free time, obviously; and am mildly bored, that’s all. So take it easy petal when you go around calling people names.

    @Cheyenne: Re: A.’s acting abilities. You are not accusing A. of being anything other than an average or below-average or whatever actress. Which is fine in and of itself. But so is 99% of Hollywood actresses and actors and I doubt you reserve the same loathing for them, or do you? Re: everything else. When did Brad Pitt take on *blame* as such for the end of his marriage to her? All the interviews I have read of him since the split repeat the same refrain: she’s a lovely woman/we’re still friends/she’s very precious to me/I just fell in love with another woman/this kind of stuff happens all the time. Which I actually think is a perfectly okay statement, but it doesn’t quite amount to taking on blame now does it? 🙂

  127. Becky says:

    I’m always amazed at the number of comments stories about Jennifer Anniston get. People always talk about her being “boring” but for someone so supposedly dull she seems to elicit strong opinions!

    I don’t think she’s the best actress, but there’s something likeable about her. Like almost all sucessful actors or entertainers, she’s probably self centered but I don’t get a bad vibe from her. I saw clips of her from the breast cancer benefit/function she was at a few weeks ago and it seemed like she truly was genuinely effected by what she heard. Yes, I think she has spoken way, way too much about the Brad Pitt-Angelina Jolie situation (it’s annoying and she should have stopped doing it a long, long time ago) but I don’t get all the negativity that’s thrown her way.

  128. birdie says:

    I am very interested for which movie roles she fought for.
    Rom-coms with her don´t do so well anymore at the box office, so she needs to chane it up either way. I am actually excited to see her in new and diffenernt roles. I don´t think she is a brilliant actress, BUT I like her on the screen!

  129. Jayna says:

    She’s limited. And she keeps the same look the last seven years. I just saw Horrible Bosses. She did a good job. But her tanorexia is embarrassing. She had very dark hair and her face was so dark. Her best movies were her early movies like the one where she fell in love with her gay friend, Object of My Affection. She was unique looking and did a great job,

    I also felt she did a really good job in Marley and Me, which depicted the realities of marriage.

    I liked her in the Breakup. But again over her dark tan in every single movie.

  130. Madisyn says:

    Bored. Yawn!

  131. hatekyle says:

    what’s she talkin about? everything she touches turns into romcom, or at least romcoms without substance.

  132. smh says:

    i’m laughing now when i think that about a month ago, her fans went crazy saying “she’s pregnant for sure!”

  133. Cheyenne says:

    Ida, I’m not saying she’s a bad actress. She’s good at what she does. But she’s a limited actress, who can only play one part well. Compare that with Streep or Helen Mirren or Julia Roberts or Catherine Zeta-Jones, all older actresses who can play a wide variety of roles and play them all well.

  134. Cheyenne says:

    @Denver: Save the word “pitiful” for her obsessed fans who are still agonizing over her divorce as if it was theirs. “She’s hurt! She’s humiliated!” It’s SEVEN FREAKING YEARS for pete’s sake! Get over it!

  135. Ella says:

    Actually, I really liked Derailed and I think she did a great job. It’s not that she can’t do other things than ROM COM but I think fans and the general public can’t stand seeing her doing something else, hence the reason people don’t like derailed. It was a great movie, a good plot, and quite the twist.No one saw it coming that Anistons character was actually a villain not a victom.

  136. The Original Mia says:

    @Real Chloe: someone usurped my name too. I had to add the Original to my handle. Sorry!

    OT: Was Five bad? I forgot to watch it.

  137. sandra says:

    Justiffer – good one!! Those matching outfits. All wrapped up in a giant scarf and buttoned up blazer – yet no socks and jeans rolled up to bare ankles.

  138. hm says:

    She’s not a good talker, neither a deep talker – boring and shallow.. Isn’t she 42 yrs old? And she def. can’t get over with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie things, even not try to do it, I guess.

  139. Rena says:

    How some here define humiliating is not how most would define it. That word is reserved for divorces like SandraB and Elin Woods who both had their whole lives opened up like a car of sardines by an endless parade of bragging women who detailed exactly what they and their husbands engaged in. That word is not applicable to Jen Aniston who has moaned and groaned and been passive aggresive for more years that she was married to a man whom she met on a blind date at a hotel set up by their agent. A man who had been through a very public breakup with a woman he called “the light of his life” and who was still reeling from that.

    Getting a divorce is not the worse thing that can happen to anyone, it is a difficult passage in life but not the worst experience ever like some seem to think it is. Both of them in that marriage voiced doubts as to its permanance, him calling it a merger that they would see how far it would go, and she saying that he was a love in her life but not THE love of her life.

    Some of you bought the whole PR golden couple faux relationship created and endorsed by tabloids and refuse to accept the reality that stares you in the face. There was pretense and Brad got beaten up by admitting it recently, for saying his truth, while Jen gets a pass for every digg thrown at him and his family now for years.

    Jen lacks versatility, she has allowed mediocrity to control her professional life and earn her millions. She has not stepped out of her safe zone except in a few films and rapidly retreated when the public rejected her in those roles. She craves public acceptance and that is what she gets in the shallow roles she gravitates to. She cannot be compared to SandraB who has done all kinds of roles over her career, who has an active viable money making film production company, a woman who does not and did not whine even when going through true Hades on earth.

    I am so tired of the pity party for this woman when so many women endure sheer torture and terror in their lives in divorce situations. I am thinking of the woman and the others just killed in Seal Beach CA by an ex spouse, now that should elicit pity and sorrow, not this extremely wealthy woman who was not subjected to any type of terrible divorce behavior. Her marriage broke up 7+ years ago like millions of others. Both ex spouses moved on. That is reality.

  140. Cheyenne says:

    @hm: I think she’s been over her divorce for a while now. It’s her fans who refuse to get over it.

  141. JP Fan says:

    This woman can not act PERIOD! She has to be a second, third fiddle to a strong male lead or in and ensemble OR a 12th fiddle to dogs! She is just an ex-sitcom star which was an ensemble and the other 5 were funnier than her.BUT she married THE Brad Pitt and THE Brad Pitt dumped her! That’s the three claims to fame she has a) Friends b) somehow bagging Brad to marry her due to GP rebound c) Brad dumping her! I hope HW is done with this talentless fameho soon…Can’t wait for WanderBUST to be a complete BUST LOL

  142. Pathetics says:

    Omg, she is soooooooooo boring!!!!! Argghhhh!!! Boring Boring blah blah blah, YET she somehow miraculous gets you people going, 138 freaking comments!!!

    YOU GUYS seem to be the boring ones with NO LIVES whatsoever that you languish in a damn thread hating on a stranger from dusk to dawn. Admit it, she peaks your interests more than your obese boyfriends peaks your sex drive. Pathetic.

    Ban me, IDGAF!

  143. LBeees says:

    Is she cold in that first pic?

    Because her hands are all up in her armpits like you do when its chilly.

    When it’s chilly and you’re sitting down, however, hands get stuck between the thighs. Everyone knows this.

  144. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    We must NEVER forget something had her in the ashes 6 or 7 years ago. Or that nobody would budge in a relationship.

    That does sound boring and uninteresting when you think about it. If she keeps talking, she may reveal more.

    Him, From 6 or 7 years ago is not allowed to talk about it because he has humiliated her enough. How does that work exactly?

    How does Justin tolerate her talking about long ago? John mayer did not like it.

    She LOST ALL parts she was fighting for? How can her fans can still claim she is not pathetic? That spells LOSER, clearly. ALL PARTS that she admits worked better without her?

    JP fans don’t have to say she can’t act. She says it herself and more importantly, she is saying the studios, producers and directors are saying it too. She can’t, won’t and is not permitted to grow. You know, stunted because she lacks something that money can’t buy and Hollywood knows it.

    WHAT is taking up space between her ears and behind her hair is turning out to be the most interesting thing about her. That ex-husband found out and beat it out of their for his own sanity. It’s not pity she needs from her fans, she needs what the Scarcrow from the Wizard of Oz needed.

    Goodness, no wonder Brad went to a smart, fearless, loving, compassionate and challenging woman who does not lose her fights or throw chairs at directors over someone else’s fights. Clear as the nose on my face, he had to have been at his wits end. He’s also right about what HE wanted for the mother of HIS children. Reveals are awesome from someone inside to the rest of us outside.

  145. ogechi says:

    Miss Aniston is one of the women I look up to. I love her dearly. She is so beautiful & classy. She was married {she was not in any partnership with any man} & there is absolutely nothing wrong talking about it. Before I judge pple, I always throw myself in that situation. Aniston has d right to talk about her previous marriage bcos she actually signed d dotted lines for heaven’s sake. However, I thank Aniston for saying this ‘“Stop taking everything so seriously. Stop being so sensitive’- this will definitely help this weekend. God bless her for me.

  146. Trillion says:

    Every single comment on this thread is more interesting than anything that has ever come out of Anniston’s little mouth.

  147. Rachel says:

    @ Julia and Minnie,guess I hit a delicate spot. Lol. No matter how much my comment irritated you,the bitter truth is that most Aniston haters seem to have singled her out for their most disparaging remarks. It almost seems like an Obsession-oops,I just made another diagnosis! Maybe I don’t know what I’m doing but what’s a group of people hating on one person for no logical reasoning called? I thought as much.

  148. So not! says:

    I think why many people dislike her so much is because she isn’t that good @ what she does but yet she gets so many accolades.
    She comes off as fake & contrived.
    All i know is that she isn’t likable. I hated her character in “FrIENDS” & all her subsequent films. She needs to quit acting & become a full time producer, giving way to younger, hotter actors who actually knows how to act.

  149. TabbyCat says:

    Oh please Ida. And Mona. Stop with the “humiliating” and “devastating” divorce. She was not the victim. She was not humiliated. Brad was the victim, he was the one humiliated, when he did nothing wrong. If she trly “loved him very much” she would not have treated him the way she did, and would not have lied to him. She clearly was not devastated at all, because only a couple of months after she filed for a divorce, she was seen dry-humping Vince Vaughn on a public balcony. She was very quick to move on. Far from being ‘devastated’. You clearly fell for her ‘act’, hook, line and sinker. It gained her support from the gullible to act like she was ‘devastated’, ‘humiliated’ and ‘shocked’. Thats why she PRETENDED to be so upset for so long. It paid off for her with attention, sympathy and public support. Boy, were you ever taken in!

  150. almond says:

    I cannot, for the life of me, get into that stupid hipster fashion of bundled up necks and bare ankles. How does a sane person come to such a combination? If it’s cold enough to tie what looks like a bed quilt around your neck, isn’t it cold enough to cover your ankles or, at least, wear socks? I just, I can’t make any sense of it.

  151. Eleonor says:

    I haven’t read all the posts, but I suppose who’s writing Aniston had a public humiliating divorce must be very young, or doesn’t know what a public humiliation is.
    I remember Diana’s divorce, and that was an hell one, there was even an infamous tape in which Carlo told to Camilla he wanted to live in her tampax.Now THAT is what I call an humiliation, and we have to remember that prince William and prince Harry were kids at the time.
    Stéphanie (it was her?) di Monaco was cheated by her husband with a pornstar, and the photos (there wasn’t internet at the time) of them having sex in a swimming pool were on every single European tabloid for months. That is a public humiliation, not filing for divorce and starting dating someone else 3 months later.

  152. lisa says:

    I think if you look at most of the comments on this thread it is that people are responding to another comment.

    As someone said before, I would be interested too in what role she “fought” for and Lost. Look.. she has been complaining that her fans.. HER FANS don’t want or will not watch her in anything else. That is to HER FANS. So I have seen her fans comment that they would like to see her in some role that is more meaty.

    and while people did take some notice of her in Horrible Bosses that performance was not so impressive that the critics and viewers didn’t go crazy over. She didn’t steal the show so to speak. And we all know that history has shown us that ONE performance in film regardless of how small can change your career. HB was not that performance for her. And while some people are sick of her same performances, she is obviously listening to that or feels the same, because she is admitting that she is not offered roles outside what she gets. So I guess she is in agreement with many of the posters here. Thing is she wanted to be a BIG star. She has the same acting coach for 20+ years.. and she does the same mannerisms in all her films. So she needs to stop listening to that A-Coach for one thing.

    LOOK. Jennifer is a co-star. that is her thing. It seems that it may be her destiny. But if she wants to do more challenging thing then go do it.

    Finance a script that you like and make the movie. Her fans claim she has such amazing power in Hollywood. Then get connected to a studio or make a TV/Cable movie. Others have done that as well and to rave reviews.

    I just think as I said before she waits for things to come to her, never has she been the one to START anything. Even with Five..an old Producer on Friends brought the project to her. Go make the things you want. Stop talking and do it.

  153. Hypocratia says:

    This is really amazing!
    145 commnents on someone most of you people dislike?!
    Why arent at fanpages of your favourite actors/actresses and write nice things to them?
    Why waste your time here?
    Has JA been mean to you in any way?? Have you ever met her?
    Why don´t you make that life of yours meaningful? She´s is! AND has a lot of money to take her places you could only dream of. And NO you don´t know what she´s doing when not in the public eye!
    But I tell you one thing: She doesn´t read this pages so she don´t care what you think of her1
    And she can do whatever she want whith all that money, I would! 😀

  154. Julia says:

    Jennifer didn’t have a humiliating public divorce. According to HERSELF, it was an AMICABLE split.

    So maybe some of her fans should stop projecting their own interpretation about how she, Jennifer perceived her own divorce during the split cause she was seen publicly smiling and cuddling Pitt hours before announcing it, she introduced the papers and was smiling and caught hand in hand with her soon to be ex husband while saying : ‘It was all an amicable split for irreconciliable differencies’, adding that from now on, he was free to live his life just like hers. He packed hos bags and moved out.

    All the rest has been public collective hysteria and exploitation by blogs, tabs and jen’s putting her dirty laundry out there three months after the divorce papers were introduced, when her ex was already at his own place moving on with his own life you expect a newly single to legitimately have….and she did the same too while still went on whining about the ex spouse’s same legitimate move.

    The rest is a slaacious fantasy rewritten by perfect strangers over and over again during the past 7 years to feed the imaginary cause of the divorc of the golden couple they admired.

    What’s humiliating is the perfect obsession of perfect adult strangers still losing their shit, mourning and thinking hard about that divorce that was never theirs to begin with.

  155. theaPie says:

    I’ve tried to dislike her, but now I’m back to liking her. I admit I’ve enjoyed every movie I’ve seen her in. She has a unique screen presence that isn’t easily duplicated. As for comparing her to Meryl Streep – please. No one compares to Meryl, there is no point in even making the comparison.

  156. Emma says:

    @Ogechi, #145 … “Before I judge pple, I always throw myself in that situation. Aniston has d right to talk about her previous marriage bcos she actually signed d dotted lines for heaven’s sake.”

    I respect what you’ve said. My only question is this: Doesn’t Brad Pitt have the same right? He signed the dotted line as well, didn’t he?

  157. Cheyenne says:

    @Julia: Excellent post. You totally nailed it.

  158. blonde on the dock says:

    @Pathetics: too funny! And probably not far from the truth!

  159. Vesper says:

    For those posters who like to use the word “hate” to descibe the comments of other posters: Just because someone makes a negative comment(s)about somebody does not make them a “hater”. It is called giving an opinion. This is a celebrity gossip site, with the name “celebitchy”, and this is the place to go if u want to bi*ch about a so-called celebrity. I’m not sure why u would be on this site if u have a problem with that. Further, to call a fellow poster “pathetic” because they are even on the site, making comments is pretty hypocritical. After all, those same name callers are on the same site, and are also taking the time to read the same articles, look thru the comments, and post. This is supposed to be a fun way to leave the realities of life and focus on the superficial.

    I’d hazard a guess that many people on this site are taking a break from the stress of daily life – working, raising children, dealing with health, financial, and relationship issues, getting an education, or whatever other stressors people deal with everyday. Everyone deals with things in their own way, and following celeb gossip is just one way.

    As for Aniston, since she has been in the public eye for two decades, frequently gives interviews, and lives in a city where the paps are everywhere, always looking for that next pic, it makes it easier to make deductions about her personality.

    It is fact, that Aniston has spent the last two decades doing mostly comedy accepting roles that are are very similar to each other. She did get good reviews after “The Good Girl”, but instead of continuing to take similar roles she took the safe route and went back to rom-coms. There is no possible way she was not offered other roles, back in the day. Over the last decase, the quality of her rom-coms has decreased as evidenced by the budgets of those movies, her salary per movie and the fact that more and more producers seem to realize she can’t carry a movie on her own. She has had 20 years to prove herself as an actress. She made a conscious choice to not take any chances, not mix things up, and to stick with the same roles. Talking about expanding 20 years into ur career sounds lame.

    As for comments about her personality, u don’t have to know someone personally to get an idea of what they are about if they are in the public eye, give frequent interviews, and are constantly being photographed going about their daily lives. Ever watch any interview of Aniston? It is pretty obvious by her comments and interests that she is nowhere near the maturity level of the average 42 year old. She watches lots of reality shows and especially likes Jersey Shore. She talks about superficial hobbies which she never seems to expand. She has done very little travelling outside of promoting her movies, with the exception of her fav holdiay spot in Mexico. In Mexico is she ever pictured exploring the sites, enjoying the culture? All we ever see is her sunbathing, and partying, likely never leaving the hotel property.

    Even the above interview is telling. She actually made a reference to an episode of the Brady Bunch. What adult would make such a lame reference? And what adult can remember such a specic detail about a childhood show? Does she actually watch Brady Bunch reruns?

    Pap pics of her typically have her leaving a restaurant, tanning on some beach, out on a date, or enjoying some superficial social event. How often has she been photographed attending a charity event? It is not often.

    The ridiculousness that her divorce was humilating has already been addressed by others. However, I would like to add Maria Shriver, and the ex-Mrs. Tiger Williams to that list. Even Mia Farrow, who wasn’t married to Woody Allen, but had a long term relationship and a child with the man went thru hell. In her own words, she describes finding naked pictures of her step-daughter that Allen took while he was still dating Farrow. Not to mention he then dated and subsequently married the same step daughter, and in the process completely tore apart a mother-daughter relationship.

    Aniston has shown time and time again over the last 20 years what she is about, and what she considers important in life. Obviously many people are going to react with negative comments, and it doesn’t make us jealous. BTW, comparing her life & career to Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie is beyond insulting.

  160. Cherry Rose says:

    Actually, the only movie I truly liked Aniston in was Rockstar. And I did like her in Horrible Bosses.

    I wish she’d go brunette, as it kind of gives her a more sexy vibe. Whereas when she’s blonde, the most I could say is that she’s cute.

    But alas, one cannot be Malibu Barbie when you have dark hair. ;/

  161. Vesper says:

    I don’t watch her movies anymore, but I did like her in ‘The Good Girl’, ‘Rock Star’ and especially ‘Derailed’. I really think her career could have taken a very different path if she didn’t take the easy way out and stick to the same role. However, I think that 10 years after the fact, playing the same role, more or less, her ability to expand her range has been stunted. If u don’t grow u stagnate and if u are in that same place long enough it is just that much harder to get out. I don’t think she ever will. I don’t think Aniston has the self esteem, the ambition, the determination or the skill to go further.

  162. Amanda says:

    I agree totally. I was a bit surprised to see her playing that role in horrible bosses. Kind of a crazy part. Definitely something different. I am so use to see her in, as she calls “rom com girl next door” it was weird to see her in that role.

  163. anom says:

    aniston is so fake and phony, yet she has conned her way in. malibu barbie? a woman of greek ancestry who is a natural fuller-figured brunette with fluffy hair, large nose and hazel eyes who starved and exercised her natural shape, colored her hair blonde, had 3 nose jobs and uses contact lenses to change and intensify her eye color? she is someone who does not really love her true self. that is sad.

  164. ogechi says:

    @Emma: I’ve never said Pitt doesn’t ve d right to talk abt his previous marriage. I know I had disagreed with Kaiser on some of her opinions concerning Jennifer Aniston but d truth can’t we washed away. I’m a lady, I know d pains of breakups in relationships bcos I have been there severally, so you can imagine how it feels when a marriage is broken! I have not met Jen, Pitt or Jolie but I have read a lot to choose who I like. Miss Aniston come across as a very sweet lady but I don’t understand why pple call her names though. Whatever that makes people to express such hateful emotions towards her are d same reason why I love her!!! Fortunately I enjoy all her movies & I see her as a great actress.

  165. ogechi says:

    I means, Miss Aniston comes across#.

  166. Julia says:

    @ Rcahel

    Nice try !

    You didn’t hit anything, i am the daughter, the cousin and niece of no less than 7 doctors among which one psychiatrist in my direct family and would have followed the family tradition if i didn’t faint each time at the simple view of blood.

    I also have a sister who is a scientist researcher for vaccines in one of the top 3 worldly industries and using your mental health hability to draw diagnosis is not just wrong, it’s pathetic and insulting towards your core business, insulting for someone who flatter herself studying mental health.

    It’s insulting to the scientist community, a community i hold with greater respect than you seem to as you use them wrongly to take cheap shots on a gossip blog just to do your fanatic duty of overprotecting Jen Aniston from any criticism.

  167. Marina85 says:

    I’m LMAO seeing the usual suspects (Cheyenne, Julia, Mln76, Lisa, etc…) all up and down EVERY.SINGLE. Jennifer Aniston thread, trashing, ridiculing, belittling her and being incredibly cruel, while these EXACT SAME POSTERS are the ones getting all upset whining on Angelina Jolie threads when anyone dares to make a non adoring comment, calling them haters, and pathetic for making negative comments about her, even directing people to other sites. Huh hello… Pot..Meet kettle… you’re doing the EXAT SAME THING to Jennifer Aniston you accuse other people of doing in AJ threads. Aren’t you rational enough to see that, and the unbelievable hypocrisy of it all?

    A couple weeks ago, there was a poster named Olivia who made a disparaging comment about AJ and all of you were sooo pissed at her that she dared to make a nagative comment about AJ, yet what I am reading here is far far worse than what Olivia wrote…You all let your emotions of being overly invested in the life of your favorite celebrity completely cloud any sense of objectivity and rational thinking that may remain.
    Lastly, I’ll say this: if, as you all say, Jennifer Aniston is sooooo boring, then why are you all so invested in her life, why do you all research her love life, her box offive numbers, why can you give out dates and numbers off the top of your head?
    I don’t like Lohan find her boring, and I never ever open her threads, let alone post on them all day. That’s what the effect of a boring person is, they leave you indifferent. Jennifer leaves noone indifferent so she is certainly anything but boring.

  168. kat says:

    no she can’t

  169. Ogechi says:

    Gosh, too many typographic errors. Hope my comments made sense though.

  170. Cheyenne says:

    Ogechi I don’t think Emma was referring to you personally but you have to admit that a lot of Aniston’s fans who said she has a right to talk about her marriage, went positively apoplectic when Brad finally did the same seven years later. If she can talk about the marriage, so can he. As Emma said, they both signed on the dotted line.

    _____________________________________________

    @Marina85: If you think anything you read on this thread is “far worse than anything Olivia wrote”, then you definitely have a reading comprehension problem.

  171. The Bobster says:

    That first picture is so photoshopped it looks like a cartoon.

  172. minnie says:

    @ Marina85… and what about what others have said about the JPs, edited the names, n but those are too, usual suspects inthe JP threads besides Olivia. And many the comments are way worse, here they kind of refrain a little, but I have seen some of these names in other sites, and they are quite mean to the JPs, assuming that they are the same names with the same point of view.

  173. Rudypatudie says:

    Marina 85…..

    Will you marry me?

    You are so correct, and so hilarious.

  174. islandgirl says:

    Cheyenne: People like Marina85 see what their want to see or I should say read what their want to read.

  175. Emma says:

    @Marina85, who wrote: “I’m LMAO seeing the usual suspects (Cheyenne, Julia, Mln76, Lisa, etc…) all up and down EVERY.SINGLE. Jennifer Aniston thread, trashing, ridiculing, belittling her and being incredibly cruel, while these EXACT SAME POSTERS are the ones getting all upset whining on Angelina Jolie threads when anyone dares to make a non adoring comment, calling them haters, and pathetic for making negative comments about her, even directing people to other sites. Huh hello… Pot..Meet kettle… you’re doing the EXAT SAME THING to Jennifer Aniston you accuse other people of doing in AJ threads. Aren’t you rational enough to see that, and the unbelievable hypocrisy of it all?”

    Marina85, at least 98% of the ‘disparaging’ comments aimed at Jennifer Aniston are about her talent as an actress (fair game, as that ‘is’ her profession … the same for Angelina Jolie), her appearance–body, clothes, and changes therein (fair game because she is a public figure … the same for Angelina Jolie), and the antics of her PR Machine. Whereas about 98% of the ‘disparaging’ comments aimed at Angelina Jolie are often the stuff of fantasy and/or truly personal attacks filtered through the poster’s angst over the breakup of the Aniston-Pitt marriage. Such as:

    ‘She broke up the fairytale marriage, she ‘stole’ Brad, she’s a wh0re, she’s a slut, she’s a serial homewrecker, she’s a witch who has drained Brad dry, she’s a brother f#cker, she’s a brother kisser, she’s a vampire who wears blood around her neck, she’s an addict, she’s a heroin user, she’s trying to make Shiloh into a boy, she hate’s her bio-children, the only time she spends with her kids is when she’s using them for PR, the twins look funny, do the twins have Downs syndrome?’

    The hypocrisy is in thinking that ‘any’ of the comments made about Jennifer Aniston come close to equaling the horribly offensive things said about Angelina Jolie.

    @Ogechi, I certainly was not singling you out. I was referring to Jen-Hens in general.

  176. Camille says:

    @Rena #139: Excellent comment! I agree with you.

  177. Vesper says:

    I so agree with @ Julia regarding her comments about @ Rachel. From someone who has taken psychology at the graduate level, Rachel ur comments are so ridiculous it is obvious u have little to no knowledge of the subject. Taking a psych. 101 course thru distance studies (which u likely failed), does not make u an expert on mental health. Nor is a gossip site the place to practice ur lack of knowledge on people u know nothing about. Oh, and, sweetie, “obsession” is not a “diagnosis”. LOL.

  178. Runs with Scissors says:

    Wow. This is insane.

    Yeah, because attacking someone for donating 10+ years and tons of money to good causes (check ANY post about her humanitarian work), calling a mother of 6 children a home-wrecking whore (based on nothing but tabloid gossip and a 7 YEAR pity party, when ALL parties said there was NO AFFAIR) and condoning racist and homophobic comments about children, is JUST AS BAD AS saying someone is fake, shallow, manipulative and over-rated in talent and attractiveness. Right.

    These two women (and their fans’ values) are clearly in totally different classes.

    I’d always rather be on the side of ‘flawed, but utterly honest about it, intelligent and striving to do some good,’ than ‘shallow and clingy and would throw a mother and children under a bus for a few bucks and some more fame.’

    I think that pretty much sums up the two fan bases.

    I used to like Jen and thought she was harmless and sweet, but I’ve been following this for a while, and it’s clear that she is utterly deceitful and frankly has done a lot of damage.

    She has lowered our expectations of women in general. She is a champion of contrived flash over substance. She is an example of mediocrity being honored without merit.

    But that’s not what bothers me first and foremost.

    She has exploited innocent people, both Pitt, Jolie, and even their children and her OWN fans, (women who really HAVE been through messy, painful divorces, who husbands really DID cheat on them, often with children and without millions of dollars in the bank) in order to make a buck. She disgusts me.

    I think the only fans she has left are either not paying attention, (which I can understand) or are so bitter about their own lives that, despite ALL evidence, have made her the poster child of their pain. Either way, it’s exploitation and it makes me sick.

    She’s worse than a Kardashian. She is exploiting people’s honest pain.

  179. marybeth18 says:

    My biggest problem with Jennifer Aniston: the incessant hair touching. She does it in every role she plays, and she does it in every interview. Just put your hair behind your ears!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCemofMFDiw

  180. Vesper says:

    @ marybeth18 – Oh my, I never realized how much she touches her hair. In some shots it almost seemed that she was more focussed on her hair than on the conversation.

    In one of her interviews she admitted she used to keep tiny scissors in her car glove compartment so that when she noticed a split end, she could cut it off immediately. LOL, how very vain!!! It’s almost like she is so ditzy that she doesn’t realize how silly she sounds.

  181. blonde on the dock says:

    @ Runs with Scissors: you must have a miserable existence.

  182. Cheyenne says:

    #181: Blondie, don’t try to project onto somebody else what everybody on here says about you.

  183. Runs with Scissors says:

    @”blond on the dock”, “ski bunny,” whatever you’re calling yourself in this incarnation, looks like I touched a nerve. You’ve just revealed yourself for what you are., as if there was any doubt.

    I choose substance over empty, mediocre, flash.

    That doesn’t make me miserable, it makes me an adult. An inspired one at that.

  184. Rudypatudie says:

    ‘She broke up the fairytale marriage, she ’stole’ Brad, she’s a wh0re, she’s a slut, she’s a serial homewrecker, she’s a witch who has drained Brad dry, she’s a brother f#cker, she’s a brother kisser, she’s a vampire who wears blood around her neck, she’s an addict, she’s a heroin user, she’s trying to make Shiloh into a boy, she hate’s her bio-children, the only time she spends with her kids is when she’s using them for PR, the twins look funny, do the twins have Downs syndrome?’

    Gee, Emma. You have aj spot on.

    * wink wink *

    It’s so fun to come here now, not forth bitchy gossip, but for the obsessive blathering know nothing shrews who post here fanatically. It’s so mind blowing that there are women who obviously view this as their forum, their exposure and their existence. Good lord. Don’t you regulars realize that you are a wee bit terrifying?

  185. Pat says:

    Cheyenne – no one said Brad could not talk about his marraige. He has every right. It just made him look pathetic and obviously not over what happened 7 years ago. Obviously he wanted Jen badly to have his babies and it looks like she refused. Good for her. He obviously then had them with Jolie. A pay back to Jen. “If you won’t have babies for me I will find someone who will”. He seems to still be mad at Jen for not having his babies. Hence the “I am so glad that Jolie is the mother of my children”. That obviously was aimed at Jen. He is so bitter about that and unable to move on – that became obvious by his statement. But does he have the right – for sure. All I can say is that Brad needs to move on and stop thinking about Jen and her having his babies. She obviously did not want to have children with him and in reprospect I am sure she is glad that she did not. He is such a pathetic excuse for a man. Lucky Jen – unlucky Angie.

  186. Imelda says:

    I think a lot of Jen detractors (on here anyway) somewhat miss the point. They moan that Jennifer only takes regular holidays to her favourite destination where she likes to work on her tan and have a few drinks (who doesn’t when they go on holiday), they moan she is a generic actress, they moan she cant keep a man yadda yadda – same stuff everytime.
    They compare her to Angelina who we’re told is none of these things.
    But that IS the point – that is Jennifers charm – she is an everyday woman who most of us can relate to. Hence her career choices – she knows thats her niche – play to your strengths isn’t it.
    But no playing to her strenghts and admitting your weaknessess is not good enough for the detractors.
    AJ while commendable in her humanitarian efforts is simply not a woman the average joe soap can relate to.

  187. Iggles says:

    Was there a role she fought for but didn’t win? “I’ve lost all the battles that I fought for.”

    Did she have regrets when she saw someone else in the role? “No, I sat there and went, ‘That actually was better that way.’”

    She just admitted other actresses do the roles she wants BETTER than she would, and therefore the casting directors made the right choice NOT to cast her.

    So what roles does she get cast in? Rom coms. Apparently the casting directors know best!

    Brad seriously traded up, man. Angie is an oscar winner, she takes daring roles, and isn’t afraid to finance film projects she believes in! It’s called gusto, ambition, and drive! In comparison, she seems like a stronger person.

    Yeah, I said it! Jenhens can yell at me all they want, but you know its true…

  188. Erin says:

    I’m a fan of both women,who are so different you cant even compare them.I think the loonies on this site are out of their minds.But reading these comments have become my favorite hobby.Its hilarious…go right ahead and call me pathetic,I dont care..lol

  189. mona says:

    @ Runs with Scissors :

    I don’t judge people that I don’t know, but I do have an opinion.
    One doesn’t have to judge in order to have an opinion.
    I try to make my comments reasonable and not vicious.
    Why are you attacking me?
    What is your problem?
    I expressed my opinion on a gossip site about Aniston, I didn’t call you or anybody else stupid.
    Just, because people have different views on any given subject doesn’t make them stupid.
    I have a right to my opinion same as you do.
    I CERTAINLY DON’TG GO ON A GOSSIP SITE TO RIP SOMEONE INTO PIECES THAT I DON’T KNOW.
    I’m no fan of Aniston, she is an average actress at best, but she seems nice.
    I wish her the best.
    Same as I do for Pitt, Jolie and their lovely children.
    I very much respect Jolie’s humanitarian efforts, 10 years shows a true dedication to a very important cause.
    I should know, I was a refugee myself once.

  190. anne_000 says:

    To the posters who keep saying Brad is bitter & obsessed about his past relationship with Jennifer & that everything in his current relationship w/ Angelina, including having kids, is a concentrated jab at Jennifer, oh brother…..

    Not everything is about Jennifer…….

  191. sunny says:

    What I find truly puzzling is how most of you seem to believe that you actually know these people, Jen, Brad and Angie?
    You base your knowledge on tidbits of information from a few interviews and some sound bites.
    You have no idea who they really are when the doors are closed and there is no camera around.
    IMAGE, IMAGE, IMAGE…
    By the way, if Jen is boring, it’s not a crime, many people are boring and if she is throwing herself a pity party over her divorce, it’s not a crime either, MANY WOMEN HAVE DONE MUCH WORSE TO THEIR EX-HUSBANDS.
    So when you go through what Jen, Brad and Angie did in a very public way, you will know exactly.

  192. Cheyenne says:

    @Pat: Oh honey, please, get a grip. Brad couldn’t give a tin fart about his ex. He’s not making babies with somebody else just to spite her. Nothing he does is with her in mind. Accept it once and for all, will you: he couldn’t care less if she lives or dies. She’s ancient history. The end.

  193. Imelda says:

    Would the people trying to calm everyone down please calm down!
    Do you not know its like this everytime there’s a JA AJ BP post.
    You regular detractors could nearly cut n paste all your earlier posts and save yourselves the bother of having to type it all out again…. but tut tut Cheyenne that last post was really not nice – I dont know where or how you get the energy/time to spew such things.
    I am quite sure Brad doesn’t feel the way you’ve just indicated thats just not a nice thing to say, not nice at all.
    This isn’t bloody Lilo we’re talking about here!

  194. mea says:

    @ Pat OMG! You don’t really believe that, do you? How can Brad think about children who have never existed when he has 6 wonderful kids? I’m sure that every time he looks at them he gives himself a pat on his back for making THAT decision 7 years ago. That’s why he says his favourite film is Mr & Mrs Smith – it changed his life. He would never have had such a family if he hadn’t met Jolie. It’s not like any child would do. Not now, not when he’s their father. As Brad said, in one of the latest interviews, he couldn’t imagine his life without Zahara. And it’s the same with every one of his kids. They are his and I’m sure that he doesn’t give a rat’s a$$ about his potential children with Aniston. This is ridiculous that you people create such theories. If there is someone angry at Jen for not giving Brad children, it’s her fans, because they think that maybe then he wouldn’t have left her. Brad told you the truth lately ( the lack of children wasn’t the only reason they split up ) he was bored and unhappy in this marriage, with or without kids the relationship wouldn’t last.
    Brad made one comment about his marriage ( not Aniston)after 7 years of silence and people went crazy… creating unbelievable stories about him, his obsession with his ex and so on. But here we see another ex’s comment about ‘coming from ashes’ 6 or 7 years ago ( nobody knows what she refers to … geee) and people see it like something natural. Yes, it is natural because she has been doing it for years. Let’s talk about being angry and obsessed. And it’s an amazing coincidence that Jen mentions Brady Bunch ( not Brad Bunch by the way hehe)when a few months ago it was all over the net that Jolie’s co-partner in Kung Fu Panda – Jack Black said he gave Angie a “Brady Bunch” DVD set as a joke because the serie’s family reminds him of Jolie-Pitts. Really great coincidence…

    I don’t hate Jen, but I hate that some people give her so much credit for whatever she does and always find way to justify her behaviour while they judge and criticise other for the same things. That’s so freaking unfair and hypocritical!

  195. Cheyenne says:

    @Imelda: No, it wasn’t nice. My bad. I can’t believe these people who think he’s still pining for Aniston on some level and regrets dumping her. But maybe they should be left wallow in their own ignorance, if it makes them feel any better. 🙄

  196. Cheyenne says:

    Anne 000 and Mea: Cosign.

  197. blonde on the dock says:

    @Runs with Scissors: sorry if the truth hurts! The “exploiting people’s honest pain” comment is over the top. Did she exploit yours?

    Cheyenne: go away! You are so vile. I really don’t know why celebitchy allows you on here.

  198. Cheyenne says:

    @blondie: They’re paging you over on Female First. Ciao.

  199. Mine says:

    @#179 Runs with Scissors thank you. I have notice the same thing about JA and her fans.
    Jen has exploited innocent people. Pitt/Jolie family and women who really have been through messy, painful divorces, who husbands really cheated on them.
    I believe most of her fans are truly bitter about their own personal divorces and made Jen the poster child of their pain even thought Brad did not cheat on Jen.
    Jen pay a pr agent to put the image she wants out to the media.

  200. ceasar says:

    I’ve been happily married to the same great guy for over 26 years and never been divorced or separated from anybody.
    She is certainly not exploiting me!
    I like Jen, I don’t know her, but she seems nice and cute.
    She is not a great actress or great beauty, but I still liked some of her movies.
    I don’t know what happened in her marriage, if Brad divorced her, because she is boring than she is better off without him.
    Marriage has ups and downs, nobody is perfect.
    I’m sure they both have faults that effected their marriage.
    I don’t believe for a second that Jen or Brad alone bare 100% responsibility for the failure of their relationship.
    I didn’t like Brad’s interview in Parade magazine. If he wants to talk about his marriage, fine, he has every right as does Jen, but don’t blame the media when they pick-up the story and ask questions, be a man and stand by your words, if that is the truth.
    He was just trying to sell his new movie.
    Why would he otherwise bring it up at such convenient time?
    Both Jen and Brad milked their
    break-up!
    Their fans are fighting between each other and they are laughing all the way to the bank!

  201. Bender says:

    Runs With Scissors is quickly becoming every bit as nasty and hostile as Cheyenne (which is quite a feat). They both clearly find genuine pleasure in tearing other people to shreds, which only serves to highlight their own personal shortcomings.

    And don’t bother with the, “Jen fans do it to Angie, so we’re justified!!11” nonsense. Grow up and learn to debate like civilized adults, ffs. And for the record, I can’t stand Jenifer Aniston, so you can also save your tired hen insults.

  202. Emma says:

    @Rudypatudie, #185 … “Gee, Emma. You have aj spot on.

    * wink wink *”

    Unbelievable. Thank you for underscoring what my point.

  203. Original Chloe ) says:

    So, back to the subject:
    JA, you suck as an actress and as a role model.

    The End.

  204. Emma says:

    @Pat, #186 … ““If you won’t have babies for me I will find someone who will”. He seems to still be mad at Jen for not having his babies. Hence the “I am so glad that Jolie is the mother of my children”. That obviously was aimed at Jen. He is so bitter about that and unable to move on – that became obvious by his statement.”

    (Blinks) Thank you, as well, for underscoring another point … that the majority of Jen-Hens (in general) are so obsessively wrapped up in bitterness towards Brad after having projected themselves onto Jennifer Aniston, simply refuse to believe that Brad is ‘not’ secretly in love with Jen.

    Is it really so hard to accept the possibility that Brad truly ‘is’ glad Angelina is the mother of his children, without saying so to try and hurt Jennifer? In two months it will have been 7 years since Brad and Jen separated. Is it really so unreasonable for Brad to believe that he can now talk honestly about the love he has for the mother of his children without hurting Jen’s feelings? Isn’t it plausible that Brad and Jen simply realized that they were on two different pages about starting a family, and that Brad has absolutely no intention of hurting her by mentioning his family?

    And finally, whose feelings were really hurt by Brad’s interview in “Parade” … Jen’s or yours (plural)?

  205. Cheyenne says:

    Mine: I believe most of her fans are truly bitter about their own personal divorces and made Jen the poster child of their pain
    =============================================

    Spot on. I’ve been saying the same for almost seven years now.

  206. Cheyenne says:

    Pat, #186 … “That obviously was aimed at Jen. He is so bitter about that and unable to move on – that became obvious by his statement.”
    ===============================================

    The only thing that is obvious is that you will never forgive Brad Pitt for divorcing his wife. Why in the world you so invested in some else’s divorce?

    Brad being happy that Jolie is the mother of his children has nothing to do with Aniston. It has everything to do with him and Jolie.

    You will never accept the glaringly obvious fact that Brad is indifferent to his ex. He moved on with his life years ago. She simply doesn’t exist for him any more.

  207. TabbyCat says:

    ogechi, just what is “the truth that can’t be washed away”? That Aniston went through a divorce she caused?

  208. TabbyCat says:

    Pat, HOW is Brad a “pathetic excuse for a man” when he was the patient one who waited for someone that was playing with his emotions and using him like Aniston was? What the? After all Brad went through because of that cold, vile b*tch Aniston. The problem is Brad was too much of a gentleman, and Aniston was a pathetic excuse for a woman and I bet he thanks his lucky stars he didn’t breed with such an evil, manipulative, self-absorbed pathetic b*tch of a woman. Aniston is trash. He upgraded to a real woman who understand that a relationship is a partnership, not all about one person getting a hollywood career at their husband’s expense.

  209. TabbyCat says:

    Imelda, I see it differently. I believe that people could relate better to Angelina; an ordinary unassuming woman who dresses ordinary, and who is a mom. Not a plastic rich girl who spends money on expensive tans and margaritas. Angelina is more in touch with the common (wo)man. Aniston is more high-maintenance, pretentious and materialistic. She is nothing like the ordinary person in the street. Angelina is like an earth mother, a normal woman. Aniston looks and comes across as the type of person who would look down her nose at you whilst holding a martini in her designer clothes.

  210. Ale says:

    Hope one of those things is retire, she’s so dull and looks like a man. Always playing the poor victim, totally team angelina.

  211. Terrific work! This is the type of information that are supposed to be shared across the internet. Disgrace on the seek engines for now not positioning this post higher! Come on over and discuss with my web site . Thanks =)