Matt Damon on Obama: “a one-term president with some balls would have been better.”


Oh that Matt Damon*. He usually just tells the same stories over and over again in his press tours, so it’s nice to see him very occasionally bitching about politics. I get the sense that he’d like to say stuff like this in every interview, but that he holds it in until it comes seeping out like steam from a boiling kettle. Remember when he called Sarah Palin “absurd, like a bad Disney movie” way back in 2008 before that was pretty much the accepted opinion about her? A quick glance at our archives reminds me that he’s also expressed discontent about Obama, whom he campaigned for, earlier this year and last year. So he does mete out his political opinions rather judiciously.

In a new profile in Elle, they seem to realize that the most headline worthy Damon is one that has a strong opinion. The bulk of the piece is just an overview of his life and career. There aren’t many quotes from Damon in the story, but the ones they do include at the end pack a punch. I wonder if he said a bunch of other stuff and they just left it out, or if they only asked him about Obama.

Is it mere coincidence that today, just down the Vancouver street from where Damon sits, the first day of Occupy Wall Street–offshoot wildfire has flared up over the border? “I’ve talked to a lot of people who worked for Obama at the grassroots level. One of them said to me, ‘Never again. I will never be fooled again by a politician,’ ” Damon says, his disappointment ringing with a now-familiar tone of wounded idealism. “You know, a one-term president with some balls who actually got stuff done would have been, in the long run of the country, much better.” Damon gestures in the direction, just out of sight over the tree line, of the sign-wielding picketers who are beginning to gather steam. “If the Democrats think that they didn’t have a mandate—people are literally without any focus or leadership, just wandering out into the streets to yell right now because they are so pissed off,” he says. “Imagine if they had a leader.” And, as on the day of that DC rally, it is momentarily possible to get swept up in the moment, to imagine—however ridiculously, whether in reality or coming soon to a multiplex near you—exactly that.

[From Elle.com]

I don’t disagree with him, but I think it’s much more complicated than just blaming the President. I like angry/impassioned Matt Damon the best though. He’s the sexiest when he gets worked up about something. This guy has said multiple times that he’s not going to go into politics, but I don’t believe him. It may take another 10 to 15 years, but I expect to see him try.

*Note that I wrote that before I checked E! Online this morning and saw that they started their article on this story the very same way. Great minds.

Here’s Damon campaigning for Obama in 2008. He’s also shown in December and September of this year. Credit: WENN and Fame

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

215 Responses to “Matt Damon on Obama: “a one-term president with some balls would have been better.””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. BigHair&Pearls says:

    Gives his meagre intelligence more credit than it is worth. Somehow, he thinks being in Good Will Hunting makes him clever. Dumb actor, spouting dumb views. Insufferable.

    • Jackie says:

      agreed.

    • Alexis says:

      Desperate for attention and headlines, Damon goes from Brangelina to Obama. What a diva.

      I’m not impressed by Obama and never have been, but this “balls” thing is just stupid. This Tea Party House has infected everyone with the illusion that in a divided Washington, it’s cool and productive to scream “I want exactly what I want and I want it right now!” In fact, the Tea Party has distorted and slowed down everything coming out of Congress, and they still haven’t gotten ANYWHERE NEAR what they want, and now they look really stupid with whatever they’re doing now with the payroll tax. If that’s what “having balls” is, I’m glad fewer politicians have them.

      • vicky says:

        I would take your paragraph and substitute the words “Tea Party” with “Occupiers”.

        The Tea Party isn’t the cause of any of this mess! But the Occupiers have cost millions of $$$$ in property damage alone!

      • G says:

        I too am underwhelmed by Obama’s performance, but I understand how very difficult it’s been for him to work when the other side is willing to sacrifice progress and productivity just to slow him down/make their presence felt. Is Obama supposed to go all Rahm Emanuel on them? Would that show Matt Damon and the world that he has “balls?” Or would that just stretch the divide? Well, like Americans love to say, it’s a free country and Matt Damon is entitled to his opinion.

      • shawna says:

        yeah sounds like you’re talking about the occupiers to me there girlfriend.

      • Flan says:

        Oh, Vicky please, you’re talking about MILLIONS.

        What a laugh compared to the TRILLIONS the crisis has cost us. This while certain persons have only gotten richer during the crisis.

        But keep complaining about millions, why don’t ya?

      • vicky says:

        Flan-you mean the trillions obama has added to the dept! This country can’t take another term with this man. He is running out of other peoples money to spend.

      • Lynn says:

        I agree with Alexis but she didn’t go far enough.
        Bush destroyed the Economy and our reputation around the word. Bush stole the election through the stacked Supreme Court.He stole the reelection by spreading fear and by manipulating the voter machines. Obama has had to start from scratch.
        I think the Democratic Congress didn’t try hard enough to keep control. The new Republican controlled Congress said in the beginning that their main goal was to make sure Obama didn’t get a second term.
        Look at the alternatives….Republicans have scraped the bottom of the barrel and they only have one good candidate in my opinion and that is John Huntsman.
        Obama is better than any of them and we need to stick by him and help him.
        I think he should appeal to the Occupiers, they are mostly professionals whereas the Tea Party is a bunch of Rable Rousers.
        We should go all out the way we did in 08…try harder to get control of Congress and Keep the Senate, then maybe he can change some of the laws. Lynn

    • Lizzie says:

      Not that I agree with his view point or disagree with it, nor am I saying he is the most informed out there, but I highly doubt he has a meagre level of intelligence. His father was a stockbrocker, his mother a professor and he attended Harvard. I assume his level of comprehension in regards to politics is higher than most Americans, which can be seen as either a good or bad reflection on the state of the political minds of Americans depending on your understanding of politics.

      • SkyNet says:

        I agree with you! If you actually listen to his interviews, you find out that he is actually very intelligent. I used to think he was just another celeb that wanted to spout BS, but he’s not.

        He’s admitted that even though he supported Obama in the beginning, he’s found out that Obama wasn’t all that he said he was & that Obama hasn’t done much of what he said he would do. I think that’s where the balls thing comes into play.

      • theaPie says:

        He attended Harvard, but he didn’t graduate, and he did mostly theatre. I don’t doubt that his IQ is above average, but I’m not convinced that his grasp of politics is ‘all that’ simply because of his genetics or school attendance.

    • emma says:

      I think he’s an idiot. I wish celebrities would shut their trap on important issue they know very little about.

  2. Bite me says:

    He is entitled to his opinion 😀

  3. Anne says:

    I totally agree with Damon. Obama could have done so much more if he had Bush’s balls.

    • brin says:

      I agree.

    • xxodettexx says:

      co-sign!

      i know people are immediately going to jump on the “he’s a star and therefore should never have a political opinion” but what people conveniently forget is he is also not only a contributor to society with his many charitable works but he is also the son of a teacher, who apparently taught him the great value of family [see, his current family whom he manages to keep safely out of the glare of constant media] and gave him a unique perspective on the whole attack on teachers and union workers…

      anyway, totally agree with him on this

    • Lisa says:

      President Bush didn’t have balls…what he had was a Senate and Congress that co-signed on EVERYTHING he did…

      Something President Obama never had…screw Matt Damon AND anybody else who think they were sold a “bill of goods”…since I have an understanding about how our government is run and know that a President who dosen’t have support from Congress isn’t going get ALL of his agenda passed…is going to have to make the type of deals that he WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO MAKE IF FOLKS HAD NOT LET TEA PARTIERS TAKE OVER IN 2010 AND CONGRESS WASN’T INUDATED WITH BLUE DOG DEMS IN 2008-2009…

      Meanwhile…my sisters get to live because healthcare companies can’t deny them insurance due to pre-existining issues…folks in my community get to work because of money going to infrastructure programs…for the FIRST time in my life…and I can celebrate my family members coming HOME FROM IRAQ!

      MATT DAMON CAN KICK ROCKS!!!

      • Annie says:

        I’m with Lisa!
        To get the healthcare initiative passed required huge, swinging, steel-like balls! I think Obamas unrelenting focus on this issue unfortunately resulted in using up a majority of his political capital. I get Damon’s disappointment in Obama’s keeping on Summers, Geitner and the other supposed financial wizards that got us in this mess but lets give him another term…I think we’ll definitely benefit by having an Obama that doesnt have concerns about re-election!!!

      • Zimmer says:

        Pleased to hear all the good that has come to your family and community.

      • k says:

        I agree with most of your points.

        The one truly catastrophic strategic move he committed was pushing the healthcare issue BEFORE the midterm elections. He would have won over more people if he had first pushed the economy agenda (yes, I know that improving the economy requires universal healthcare, but too many citizens don’t get that) and then pushed hard for healthcare after Boehner rose to his evil throne.

      • Victoria says:

        Yes to everything you’ve said. While I feel that Obama is a typical politician and so I don’t trust him either, I will say he’s the lesser of two evils and he has kept a lot of his promises. But his compromises are not entirely his fault. He is only one third of the vote. And I don’t care how post-racial this society claims itself to be, these Tea Baggers have really been code wording and protesting and “birthing” the shit out of this man. Then you have the Republicans who purposely voted against most of his stuff around election time so the public would vote their dumbasses in the House and Senate to tip the balance of power.

        But the Democrats are even worse because those loser ass moderates totally were wish washy and didn’t have his back the way they should have. The President is only as strong as his team. And they failed him the same way they failed us.

      • Elizabeth says:

        I like MD but he should remember that its easy to campaign/criticize, hard to govern. Bush may have had “balls” if you want to call arrogance and stupidity that. His “balls” gave you the war in Iraq and how many US soldiers dead? I think Obama is doing alright considering the muck that is the Washington power base/ establishment. When you’re president, you have to please everyone. Its not like directing a film where you just have to please yourself (and your backers). I admire Damon’s commitment to making things better but I don’t think he’s seen all there is to see in politics.

      • laylajanelovesgossip says:

        CO-SIGN!!!!!

    • LBeees says:

      Anne, I think you meant, “…if he had Cheney’s balls.”

      • ZenB!tch says:

        Anyone’s balls would do. I hated the GWB/Cheney administration but at least they did something (evil but something).

        The joke around here (in liberal lala land, as told by people working for a liberal studio) was “Obama wanted the Earthquake to be a 3.0, the Republicans wanted it to be (whatever magnitude it was) so Obama compromised.”

        He doesn’t compromise he concedes.

      • Sloane Wyatt says:

        I agree about Obama conceding; he had one of the highest political capital to get so much more done. IMO Obama’s brief report card comments:

        PROs: He’s bringing home our troops, brave men and women used as so much cannon fodder ostensibly so America can be the world’s policeman.

        Obama showed the world how to get it done right and went right to the source eliminating Osama bin Laden. HUGE.

        CONS: He kept a completely un American torture riddled Guantanomo Bay open and passed a bill that U.S. citizens here and abroad can be imprisoned indefinitely without counsel upon the president’s discretion.

        PRO’s: Obama has not wavered in his desire to meet his campaign promises.

        CONs: With an obstructionist pub congress, Obama did not posses the talents or maybe inclination to get in there and mix it up. The progressives rolled over in surrender to the far right, hypocritically pious, Americantaliban. Meanwhile, our President did not lead both sides of the House and the Senate and did not broker deals, resulting in a do nothing bunch of fiddling oligarch’s keeping the status quo for their greedy buddies’ corporations , while the rest of us middles class and working poor burned and found our already short end of stick being whittled away.

    • G says:

      You’re feeling nostalgic for W? Seriously? The guy who ran around shooting at everything half blind? That’s not balls, that’s a grown man playing cowboy. Which is how the US found itself in the sorry state it was in when Obama got elected. Sure, I think the executive branch is looking somewhat emasculated these days but that’s one of the pitfalls of having checks and balances. Would you rather Obama resort to lying/threatening/blackmailing to push his ideas through? I wouldn’t. I’m still hoping, perhaps naively, that he finds a grown-up way of getting through to the other side.

  4. Agnes says:

    I agree with him on this.

  5. jferber says:

    I think Matt’s wounded idealism makes him sound petulant and childish. Get over it, Matt, and get behind your president. Obama is in for a tough battle and we don’t need sanctimonious defeatists now, but real men and women willing to support a flawed, yet viable president. Think of the alternatives. Care for President Romney or President Gingrich? So take your own advice, Matt, and grow a pair. It’s unconscionable to desert the president now.

    • Sara says:

      He isnt deserting the President, he has never said he wont vote for him, but why should he sit back and say nothing if he doesnt agree with the President? Should we all just sit back and say nothing? Just let the President (whoever he is) think that we agree with everything he is doing? It’s not an all or nothing thing. You dont have to be 100% for or against someone. Should Republicans not have spoken out against the war in Iraq when the Bush admin was in office? When citizens keep quiet bad things happen.

      • vicky says:

        If he has a brain or any common sense he won’t vote for him!

      • bluhare says:

        This is for Vicky:

        So brains and common sense equal a vote for one of the Republican candidates? If that’s true, then count me in amongst the stupid.

      • Lou says:

        But Vicky, Obama is the one you vote for if you DO have a brain. The Republican field are hypocritical theocrats who pretend to love the Constitution, but are openly talking about destroying the judiciary. If you can’t see how incompetent they are you must be blind. Where are all the intelligent Republicans hiding? The party is a joke.

      • vicky says:

        I don’tremember saying i was a republican because i’m NOT. I want what is best for my country and that is NOT what has been going on in the last 3 years. 15 T in dept, more spending than all the other presidents combined and we still have over 9% unemployment! So if you have a brain you will realize this is NOT working.

      • womanfromthenorth says:

        vicky… back away from the punch bowl.

      • vicky says:

        That was enlightening.

    • LeManda says:

      I’m not even American and I agree with you jferber. Obama got stuck with an enormous mess to fix. I can not understand why Americans expected him to be able to fix every single problem in the first few days after being elected. He may not be perfect but from what I see of your other options, he was and seems to be the best choice for right now. You could do way worst!!

      • Trek Girl says:

        @LeManda: I agree with you. It seems that many Americans have short memories, little understanding about how the governement works, and are incredibly impatient.

        The situation that the country was in when Mr. Obama took office is not something that can just be stopped; it’s a process, and they don’t seem to get that. Not to mention the Republicans and the inordinate amount of resistance he’s been met with on all sides.

        I am proud of the job Mr. Obama has done, and because nobody knows the full story, even though so many people think they do, I will not say that he should have done or could have done more, when it is obvious just how much crap he has had to deal with that truly does stand out from past presidencies.

        I like Matt Damon, but I do not agree with him on this issue. He actually comes off as Naive to me.

    • The Original Mia says:

      Co-signed!

  6. Sara says:

    I hate that people will say “Matt you are an actor I dont care what you say” or “stick to acting, who do you think you are” etc. Matt didnt give up his right to have an opinion just because he is a celebrity. If you dont like what he has to say fine, he isnt asking you to agree with him. If you ask why we should care what Matt has to say I ask why I should care what you have to say? His opinion is just as important as your opinion. Don’t agree with it, but dont say he doesnt have the right to say it.

  7. Poison Ivy says:

    STFU! I hate it when rich actors pretend they have a clue on politics and how to run a country. Stick to your jobs shmocks.

    • WillyNilly says:

      As opposed to YOUR day job not allowing you to have an every day opinion of your country?

      Just sayin’…

      • Poison Ivy says:

        Of course Damon has the right to have an own oppinion but he is also a pulic person and the stuff he is tellin in interviews will be printed all over the world – so I do think it was stupid and unappropriate to say the president doesn’t have balls or another had done it better. You’re always smarter afterwards…

    • REDSLIP says:

      Me too, I hate it when dumb actors stick their nose into politics. Remember what a disaster former actor President Reagan was?

  8. inthekitchen says:

    I guess he hasn’t seen this website: http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/ or this one: http://obamaachievements.org/list

    What a disappointment. Of course Matt is entitled to his opinion but he comes across as some stupid Firebagger who just wants to trash Obama rather than looking at the biger picture of, you know, reality and a) the FACT that Obama has gotten more done than ANY president in about the last 60 years and b) he’s been met with not only a complete stone wall of NOs from republicans (even when it’s things they have campaigned on) but also lots of democratic congress members who also vote against what Obama is trying to get done. Bush, on the other hand had a complete rubber stamp from his party (plus lots of dems who didn’t want to be called traitors if they dared to disagree)…so yeah, it looked like Bush was more effective, but it’s just not true.

    • Naye in VA says:

      Totally agree.. Coming off of 9/11 gave Bush the freedom to do whatever he wanted because everyone was so scared and nobody wanted to be unpatriotic. Now, talking badly about the president has been turned into sport. The man isn’t sitting on his haunches, Congress is. The minute we get EVERYBODY out to vote midterm elections is the minute things will start to change. Stop letting the rich constituents make decisions that hold our lives in the balance

    • Trek Girl says:

      I cannot thank you enough for this. I agree. People act as if Obama has done nothing, and it is just painful to hear this because he has to put up with SO much, and inherited such a mess when he took office, that the fact that he got as much done as he has speaks to what a good President he is and how much he fights for what he believes.

      President Obama is a president, not a king. He can’t just make things happen when he wants or how he wants, yet people act as if he can.

      Ugh – that’s all I can say about Matt in this instance; just, ugh.

  9. Jenn says:

    Matt has every right to his opinion. I just happen to disagree with it. I guess he would prefer Gingrich or Trump. Lately he does two things when promoting his films, mention Brad and trash the President.

    I am really offended that he is trying to emasculate President Obama, which I cannot forgive. He has not been perfect, but look at the idiots he has had to deal with. The republicans would rather destroy the country than see President Obama re-elected. Just look at their behavior in the past two weeks. I guess Matt is right there with them.

    • Sara says:

      Where does he say he would rather have Newt or Donald as President? He has never said that, and if you listen to what he says you know he would say that or vote for them or even think they would be better. He is just saying he doesn’t like what Obama has done. He may not like Obama but come Nov he will vote for him, cause there is no one else.

    • Kate says:

      I love that people conveniently forget that for the first two years of the Obama administration, he had democratic majorities in both the house and the senate and, in fact, had a 60-40 advantage in the senate. Yet it is still always the fault of the evil republicans.

      And don’t read this as a pro-republican rant, because it isn’t. They are just as incompetent when it comes to governance.

      • Poison Ivy says:

        It’s true they had the majority in the fist 2 years BUT right after Obama got elected the financial crash went down and there was other big stuff to deal with.

        Bush had 8 years to f*ck this country up and you want Obama to fix it in just 2 on top of the financial crises?

      • maymae says:

        Actually the President does NOT control CONGRESS any failure to act is on CONGRESS. Within Congress Repubs did everything to divert and block laws, additionally within the Democratic party you had conservatives like Lieberman who would block legislation. A general CIVICS lesson you be required by all before they vote.

    • Danziger says:

      Oh yeah man, it’s the “you’re with us or against us” mentality on display again. The fact that Matt’s disappointed in Obama’s lack of action doesn’t mean he’s totally preferring the opposite side. And I agree with him, though I predicted it before Obama got elected that he seems to be a man of words with good intentions, but not much of a ‘doer’. It pains me that I was right.

      All the goodwill in the world won’t make a you a good president if you don’t have the balls to break through the tangles of the institution and, idk, do something important.

      • Jenn says:

        I am alot more concerned about losing my rights as a woman and human being under Gingrich or Romney, so yes, that is how I feel. They seem to want the US to go back to being isolated and women, people of color, gays and others going back in the shadows.

        This is nothing but an ad for them written by Damon. Again, he has a right to his opinion, just as I have a right to mine.

      • maymae says:

        Lack of action the man has been BUSY: http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/ or this one: http://obamaachievements.org/list

        or lack of action to do what Damon wants.

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        @poison ivy, Clinton (although great for foreign relations) was the one who got the subprime mortgage ball rolling. We just didn’t see the financial repercussions until Bush took office. A perfect storm of bad decision making took place during both the Bush and Clinton terms (some would argue it goes as far back a H.W. Bush) and now we’re left with an economic nightmare.

      • Alexis says:

        ONLY A SITH THINKS IN ABSOLUTES

        (I quote ROTS at every opportunity)

    • maymae says:

      If Matt loses 40 dollars thats less money for weed. The middle class loses 40 dollars there goes the budget. He is RICH, he has a movie to sell and talking about a grown black man’s balls is the easiest way to get attention for that crap movie I WILL NOT be seeing.

  10. The Other Katherine says:

    Matt Damon is absolutely correct. Kudos to him for standing up and saying it. I donated money to Obama in the Democratic primary last time around; this time, I’m donating to Ron Paul. Paul may be a loon when it comes to his ideas about the economy and regulation of business, but his commitment to civil liberties (unlike Obama’s) appears to be genuine based on his lengthy voting record.

    Obama has done nothing to slow the pace of the U.S. government’s march down the road to a corporate-controlled, unaccountable police state. Damn straight, I’m pissed off. You can’t shit all over your base and then expect them to turn out and reliably vote for you. Lookin’ at you, Obama.

    It may be that a President Romney or President Gingrich is required to get the Democratic party leadership to remove their collective head from its current place of rectal insertion.

    • oh dear says:

      i agree!
      by the looks of it, ron paul is the americans only hope now, the other bitches are all wallstreet puppets, just like obama turned out to be! people say he hasnt brought on change.. well he brought on change alright, just the opposite of what he was campaigning for! americans have now lost all their human rights, its time to get them back, dont fall for the propaganda!

      i just dont see how theyre (you know who) gonna let ron paul be elected. i see a heart attack or a gun shot in his immediate future, should his support continue to increase! sad as it is, you just have to look back at the american history to realise that somebody as honest and incorrupt as him doesnt survive the american political system for very long.

      so yeah, i can see why matt is pissed off with obama, especially when he was such a big supporter of his and was let down like that. you might not agree right now, but 40 years from now youll look back at this time and wonder, how you could have been a part of “this” and freely given everything away that your founding fathers fought for, in the name of “security”.

      but dont feel bad, its just history repeating itself 😉 people before us fell for it, people after us will fall for it. however, there comes a time when you have to wake up. and acknowledging a problem is the first step to the solution 😉

      have a lovely day 🙂

      • blc says:

        If you think that Ron Paul is American’s only hope, that is a sad, sad statement. Havent’ you been watching the news lately? All his past involvement with white supremacist organizations (see: John Birch society) is coming out, and he is lying and changing his story on it all.

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/22/ron-paul-walks-out-cnn-interview_n_1165363.html

      • Sonya says:

        @blc – that’s a nice link you got there for the Huff Post.

        Paul’s maintained that he never wrote those letters, it’s been old news for quite some time. He’s also repeatedly stated (as a typical libertarian) that he doesn’t want government to get involved in social issues, period. Out of the rest of the morons supposedly running for president, he seems to be the only one focusing on the only issue Americans care about right now: the economy. But he is pretty outspoken, and it’s likely that he won’t be elected for this reason.

  11. lisa says:

    Matt has a right to his opinion and to voice it. The thing that I notice is the hypocrisy. If this had been some other celebrity they would have been attacked to high noon. Matt is considered a “nice guy” and can get away with this.

    I don’t care what anyone’s political views are. Everyone has them. I would rather he make these statements outside of promoting his film. Takes away from the purpose of his promotion. But its funny how some celebrities get attacked for their views and others a free pass.

    • Danziger says:

      Some people just seem to have more credibility. The more cred you have, the better you can get away with voicing your opinions. That’s how the world works, sweetheart.

      • Shay Kay says:

        You took the word right out of my mouth.Obviously Matt seems to have “integrity” which lends him “credibility.”I have no problem with anyone who doesn’t agree with him but it is a human truth that your reputation does proceed you.

    • Sakyiwaa says:

      I think it’s still not fair… he has ‘integrity’ and ‘credibility’ and so can refer to a President’s ‘balls’? And what exactly is Damon’s reputation about anyway? Name-dropping?

  12. Ycnan says:

    Should have made Hilary the democratic candidate. She would have been a lot better, knew how to play the game and frankly would have had more balls for lack of a better word.

    • Nono says:

      America can’t handle a liberal woman as their president. If she were dumb as Palin and just posing like a marionette they’d welcome her.

      Sexism is still openly acceptable.

      Oh and Damon along with Clooney and Pitt need another shtick to sell instead of repeating the same naive uninformed political nonsense.

      • WillyNilly says:

        Clearly not, Nono, since the US laughed at Palin until she finally gave up. And we’ve differing opinions, since I totally thought she WAS a puppet for the conservatives. 😉

        I totally agree about Hillary.

      • Alexis says:

        Agreed, Hilary was openly subject to sexism from the press in the 2008 primary. It was unfair.

        It’s not just liberals, though. Bachmann is being subject to sexism, as well, right now. She’s crazy and not particularly smart (though no dumber or more crazy than any of her opponents), but she’s being alternately ignored and disrespected by the press because she’s a woman who doesn’t want to grin and wink and be proud of her ignorance. She has the audacity to want to run as a serious candidate. I disagree with Bachmann on pretty much everything, but I can’t believe the press would do that to another female primary candidate, as many people observed and disapproved of how Hillary was treated.

      • Miss Thang says:

        Not to mention other candidates! I saw a debate where she was continually disrespected by Gingrich and actually had to say “I am a serious candidate for this presidency.” One should never have to say that during a debate lol. It’s outrageous the way she’s treated, same for every female candidate. It’s not been good for women. Maybe we need a black woman to bridge the gap? I’d be VERY interested to see how a black woman would do now that we have a black man for president.

    • Kevin says:

      Now dat Bizzitch got some balls!! Plus the jowls of an English bulldog.

  13. jferber says:

    I agree with Jenn. And Sara, he can disagree with the president and say so without the personal attacks. And yes, timing is everything, so to go all hissy fit on the president just before an election is stupid and counter-productive. And what Republican actor (yes, there are some) has bad-mouthed a Republican president on the eve of a re-election campaign? That’s right, none. They really know how to close their ranks. Obviously, Matt Damon can say whatever he wants, but a bit of common sense, forethought, and, yes, loyalty, would go a long way.

  14. jferber says:

    Lastly, during election season, you ARE either for or against a candidate. How can anyone not know that? And by calling him a “one-term president,” he IS saying Obama will lose in the coming election. And by trashing him now, he HAS abandoned him.

    • maymae says:

      Matt is trying to sale tickets to another crap movie. Further more issues like the pay roll tax or unemployment are of LITTLE concern to a rich one percenter who can afford to patronize his vanity projects. Damon can stay home, he is rich, he will not lose money, he will not lose reproductive rights. The choice is yours but dont blame Obama.

    • Alexis says:

      No, I think he’s saying that Obama is trying to get a second term through appeasement and playing it safe. Damon’s saying that he’d rather a Democratic president risk the second term and play it risky and “ballsy” (whatever that means). Pretty dumb if you ask me, shows ignorance about how politics works — but he wasn’t saying that he hopes Obama will be one term, imho.

  15. Naya says:

    Democrats were sold a bill of goods in 2008. We were told we would get a progressive president and what we got was a pro-business little d democrat who allowed the political conversation to be dominated by the Republican minority. Like Matt, I intend to vote for Obama in 2012 but I’m not knocking on a single door or giving him a dime of my money.

    • maymae says:

      I was around in 2008 and actually LOOKED at his record and he was NEVER a progressive and always middle of the road. You failed to listen or read and it is your fault. The choice was Obama or Bomb Iran and Palin.

      • The Original Mia says:

        This argument always makes me laugh. People were looking for a messiah, instead of looking at his record. I was a Hillary supporter first, but stood with candidate Obama when he was selected. I never expected it to be an easy road for him, but I also never expected the level obstructionism that we’ve seen from the Republicans. The President has done a lot. Yes, there was more he could have done, but that blame also lays at the feet of the Dems who rolled over and caved to the Republicans.

      • mln76 says:

        @The Original Mia
        YES I remember back during the primaries that people were swearing that eventhough Obama and Hilary’s policies were exactly the same Obama was more progressive. I supported Hilary (UNTIL her and Bill started acting like fools in South Carolina) because she had more experience and I believe she would have been able to handle the repugnant Republican shennanigans(I’m not talking the DC politicians not normal people who happen to be Republicans) because she’d been there and done that. I knew when Obama got elected that there would be an inevitable backlash from his zealot supporters. I’m not saying I am happy with everything he’s done but people willingly drank the Kool-Aid and it’s their own darn fault that they are so dissapointed.

      • Miss Thang says:

        YES! I am with you 100%. Messiah indeed. His record and experience didn’t back up his claims. He was elected on good public speeches and persuasive charisma.

  16. Mac says:

    It’s time for the American people to conduct a house-cleaning.

    Comrade Obama and every other dithering incumbent should be shown the door in November.

    Furthermore I expect indictments to be handed down shortly thereafter.

  17. islandgirl says:

    I probably would take matt more seriously if he wasn’t promoting a movie.

  18. maymae says:

    I think wee Matt has a problem, why emasculate the guy by bringing up balls. Simply disagree. Balls are the Birth Certificate for the professional left.

  19. WillyNilly says:

    70%. OUCH.

    • Kevin says:

      Asli, you and I must have a different definition of “free”. If they are taking 70% of your earnings, it’s far from free.

    • WillyNilly says:

      Asli,

      I can see your point. I can also see it as the government taking the choice out of your hands for exactly how you would prefer to increase the quality of life. At least we can decide if we would rather spend it on internet or books (or our retirement account).

      But having air conditioning everywhere does sounds mighty fine in the summer! 😉

  20. TheOriginalKitten says:

    Lots of good points above and arguments to be made on both sides. I’m kind of split on this one. I voted for Obama. Did I think he was going to save this country? Hell no. I’m not disappointed in that regard, because I never bought into the “change we can believe in” BS-I’m smart enough to acknowledge that politics is a complex business. If Damon is naive enough to believe that a president can simply wave a magic wand and effect change overnight then yes, surely he will be disappointed. That being said, I still think the democratic party is a pathetic, sad lot. Obama’s presidency has really reinforced the need for a third party (NOT the green party) that reflects a more extreme liberal stance combined with people passionate enough fight for it. And Damon is right-the Dems are WAY too irresolute, apologetic, benign and essentially ineffective (or “balls-less”).

  21. Marjalane says:

    The media covered up Obama’s shortcomings- he was in no way qualified to become President. Hillary got shoved out of the picture so we could have the first African American President. It was a huge mistake.

    • maymae says:

      How can Hilary get shoved out when she lost fair and square. She did not have the votes plus she alienated her base of AA when her campaign played the race card. She fought hard and she LOST!

      • JustBe says:

        I agree completely.

        Also, there is still a lot of animus on the right (and the left, to be perfectly honest) for the Clintons for various reasons. Not to say that they are right, but Hillary’s 8 years (with Bill) in the public sphere created a group of friends and enemies that a new candidate didn’t have.

    • Miss Thang says:

      Agree 100% Marjalane

  22. maymae says:

    Damon is an idealist and if he does’nt get his way he complains and whines. I know Obama is far from perfect but ask yourself, if you are a progressive or a democrat would of picture like this have happend if Palin or Gingrich or Bush in office? http://hamptonroads.com/2011/12/lesbian-couple-share-first-kiss-navy-homecoming

    • Maureen says:

      You can’t blame “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” on Republicans. That is all on Clinton. He signed that bill in a Democrat controlled House and Senate as well. Sooo….the Democrats can be bigoted too?

    • Miss Thang says:

      The Don’t Ask Don’t Tell argument is exhausting. Let’s be honest: When it was put in place Americans AS A WHOLE were less accepting of gays and lesbians. Now, AS A WHOLE we are more accepting, so it’s been repealed. That is a reflection of American culture AS A WHOLE more than it is of any one party or group of people.

  23. lucy2 says:

    I think most people’s expectations of Obama were way too high to start with, though I think he’s actually accomplished a number of good things. I think he’s got some very good, common sense ideas and I too wish more of them could have been implemented. But I think if he gets a 2nd term, we’ll see him be more aggressive, but it all depends on the shape of Congress too. I have a feeling there is vastly more gridlock and red tape than we can even imagine.
    Personally I’m waiting to see who the GOP nominee ends up being, but at the moment none of them are remotely appealing to me.

    • Trek Girl says:

      I think you’re right. I, too, didn’t think that he was going to solve everything simply because there was so much to solve, and there was unforseen fallout from the previous presidencies. The people that are dissapointed in Obama because they thought he was going to fix EVERYTHING have nobody but themselves to blame, in my opinion.

      Obama has done a great job, especially considering the inordinant amount of resistance, red tape, and crazy antics he’s had to deal with that comes from basically all sides.

      People need to stop focusing just on Obama, and look at the rest of the people the that are involved in the Government.

  24. pamela says:

    I am no Obama supporter/sympathizer, but Matt is beginning to sound like a grumpy old man. His new tactics to sell a movie…bash Obama or mention Brad and Angie. Neither makes him look good.

  25. Zimmer says:

    Love the sidenote and I also think he’s done a lot whether one agrees with him or not.

  26. JustBe says:

    I think that Matt is entitled to his opinion, but I’m also entitled to lose respect for him for how he expresses his opinion. Perhaps his comments were taken out of context, but if you purport to be a man of intelligence, especially in the political or government arena, you should know that classless, ad hominem attacks (man lacking balls) makes you look dumb.

    I’m open to anyone criticizing any public official, but we already get ad hominem attacks by silly politicians and stupid talk shows that add nothing to the public discourse.

    What, specifically has the President done or not done that you would have done differently, Matt Damon? What, exactly, would you have done in the exact same situation? Comments and/or conversations that are specific could contribute to the public discourse and give people something to think about and discuss intelligently. Accusing someone of lacking ‘balls’ does not and makes you look childish and foolish.

    There are plenty of things that I disagree with the President about, specifically how his administration has handled education policy. I would not have hired someone as my education secretary that has only been in charge of one education system (Chicago) for a relatively short period of time. There are many experienced people who have taught and/or managed in the public education field and have done substantive research to improve education that would have been a much better fit for the position.

    • Jenn says:

      Thank you for your calm, well thought out response. I must admit that my response was visceral, especially the attempt to emasculate the President that just offended me terribly. Selling tickets to a movie is just not worth that.

      Damon should criticize what he feels are problems, but do it in a way that is productive and gives other options as to what the problems he feels are. He did not do that.

      No, President Obama has not been and is not perfect, yes he has made mistakes, but it is the alternative that has me worried. The President should also be given some credit for his accomplishments, which again, Damon did not do.

      Thank you again for expressing this better.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      This is one of the most intelligent, thoughtful comments that I’ve read on C/B. However, to play devil’s advocate: when you ask people to specifically state what we would have done differently if we were president, it’s kind of an arbitrary request. For the most part, the average American is not really qualified to discuss politics on the same level as, say a senator. Meaning, most of us are not acquainted with the machinations and complexities involved with mandating specific legislation or even passing a simple law. What oppositions would we face on a federal/state basis, for instance? I think that people expressing their dissatisfaction with the current state of the economy and the presidency is fair. It’s not our job to know how to precisely operate within the political system-after all, we rely on our president for that.

      • WillyNilly says:

        Grr. I so want to disagree with you about the public not having the knowledge base for economic policy decisions, but you have a point. Your practicality has beaten my idealism. DAMN IT.

        Its interesting though, what exactly is the critical mass where one goes from being an up and coming political genius to the jaded favor-friendly sack of crap currently sleeping in Congress?

      • JustBe says:

        I’m not specifically saying that everyone who has an opinion needs to be able to comment about it with detailed specifics, i.e. down into the weeds of federal economic policy. What I am saying is that attacks such as ‘he has no balls’ are silly and counterproductive.

        A more useful comment could simply be ‘When the President and Congress were negotiating about X, I believe the President was wrong to agree to the GOP’s demands for tax cuts for the rich forever, I would have preferred that the president would have only offered Y as a compromise and then, if the GOP refused, taken the matter to the people.

        This does require a higher level of interest and perhaps some research on the part of the general public, but, honestly, the only way for this country to improve is for all US citizens to understand the pros and cons of the policies that are affecting their lives and if they don’t agree with new legislation, demand better!

        The main issue surrounding the outcry against the Affordable Care Act is that anti-healthcare lobbyists and GOP obstructionists took tiny pieces of the legislation, gave it a negative spin (death panels, BOO!!) and fed it to an unknowing public. Most people, when polled about specific provisions in the Act, support them individually, but because the legislation has been tarred by a targeted media campaign to scare the public, many people would vote against it if they could. Even though quite a few people have pre-existing conditions that limit their access to health care, etc.

  27. author says:

    Oooooo I love these discussions. While some on the board are asking Matt to not chime in his opinion, others are saying he has the right to say what he feels. Here is the thing. Matt is an American he has the same constitutional rights that we as citizens in this country have. Especially when concerning the president. Just because he has an exorbitant amount of money doesn’t detriment the fact that he is allowed freedom of speech.
    Also @ Mac anyone that calls Obama a Comrad. Ugh, please grow up and read more. It makes anyone sounds so infantile when people say those type of remarks.

  28. Mitch Buchanan Rocks says:

    Come to Canada Matt you can have our jackass Stevie H.

  29. Nan says:

    Obama sort of got the healthcare thing going problem is that people have to buy their own insurance (and employers have to contribute if you have a job) and not everyone can afford it.

    In the US people absolutely freak over paying taxes. They don’t want to pay for other people but they don’t stop to think they would be paying for themselves too. Everyone has an excuse as to why they shouldn’t have to contribute. But if they didn’t have to worry about healthcare and retirement because everyone was participating to the welfare (ooh, that’s a dirty word here) of the community we would all be happier and spending less money anyway.

    I pay $400 a month for healthcare for my family. That’s on the low end. If you’re out of work and have to have COBRA you’re screwed b/c it would most of your unemployment check to cover the cost. Hmmm…healthcare vs eating? Which will win?

    But I live in a society that celebrates self indulgence and greed. It uses words like communist and socialist to get people to cower under the protective umbrella of capitalism without realizing that you can have capitalism with socialism (social security, medicare, unemployment, public schools…etc…all part of socialist programs for the community – people are disconnected from that reality).

    Anyway, I get why Matt Damon upset. We voted for change and we got a lot of the same. We wanted someone who would call out congress when they act like infants or cater to corporations but what you see is a lot of the same politics. He isn’t tough, he’s a mediator, moderate who is more in the middle than left. Right now you see him starting to posture b/c we’re heading into an election year. We should have seen this guy after the last election. He could have gone in swinging and created more change b/c he had a lot of good will from the people. I’m not gonna lay at his feet things he can’t change and had no control of but he’s just now starting to turn to the people.

    Off my soap box now.

    • Annie says:

      It’s been my obervation that the most ardent, flag pin wearing, super-duper patriotic Americans are the first to balk when asked to pay their fair share in taxes…

    • gg says:

      Cosign on the insurance issue! I found out I had Stage IV cancer when I was on COBRA last year. Well, good … until my COBRA ran out and I was forced to buy my own insurance. Well, because of my damn pre-existing condition, to get ANY Rx coverage I have to pay $1,600 a month, just for myself! Needless to say, I cannot afford that so i do without the Rx and lab coverage and it costs me dearly as well. I have had to quit maintenance meds because the retail cost of same is crippling – more than a car payment every month. My yearly cancer check CT and PET scans run into the thousands each time. SOMEBODY PLEASE FIX THIS IDIOCY! Because Nobama has not done so, for whatever reason.

    • crumbcake says:

      This response is in regards to people in the US who lose access to health care and become ill and then they have to go broke just to try to survive because they have to pay through the nose to get third party insurance coverage. NOBODY (rich, middle class or poor)deserves to have to worry about how they are going to pay for their medical treatment when they are facing a life threatening disease. We should NOT have to measure whether or not we should pay the doctor’s bills or lose our homes. It’s ridiculous. I found this out when I switched over to my husband’s insurance and his insurance company refused to pay for my brain tumor chemo treatment. We’re talking $5000 per month for 10 pills so I can at least begin to hope that I don’t die from this crappy disease. I didn’t ask for this brain tumor. . . it wasn’t caused by my negligence or by not taking care of myself. I didn’t choose this outcome, yet my family was penalized for it. It’s horrific that so many people who are healthy and have guaranteed life-long health insurance to decide that it’s “okay” for people to have to make choices about how much they want themselves and their families to lose because they are unfortunate enough to be one of the people who get a life threatening disease. It just isn’t right. People who don’t have decent healthcare are also at a serious disadvantage because they often times don’t seek medical help until things get really bad, because they can’t afford to go to the doctor for regular appointments (where a lot of these serious illnesses could be caught earlier when successful treatment is still a possibility). I’m not taking anything away from those who worked hard and think they deserve to sit at the top, but I guarantee there are lot more people who have worked hard as well and they are struggling just to pay the mortgage and gas/grocery bills. It’s a travesty.

  30. Hanna says:

    Celebs bitching about politics. In my opinion, Obama did what he could, fyi he inherited a whole lot of crap cuz of that air head Bush.

  31. BUCK says:

    It’s not even about what you get, it’s about will you fight for anything. If Ms Parks were depending on Obama, she would have died riding the back of the bus.He would have made a comprimise and she could have rode up front on Sundays.People thought they were getting a Martin L. King, but got a Rodney King.Sometimes people just get tired of voting for the lesser of two evils.Lets get real, the heath companies are getting super rich off that deal, no public option, no bankers in jail,and the Bush tax cut will go on, big oil will still get a gov check, and SSI and MEDIcare will be cut. The diff between the right, right will put a gun to the middle class head and it’s over, the left will use a knive and 100 stabs over time, but still the middle class will die, flip a coin.

  32. judyjudy says:

    I hate hearing about political opinions on a celeb gossip site. Bring on the nip-slips, the canoodling, and the baby-mama-drama!

  33. k says:

    I think Obama made some mistakes, but mostly he and his administration lack the spectacular talent of self-promotion that the Bus administration had mastered to the point of seamless spinning. He does not advertise well enough all of the gains in terms of foreign policy, the way the healthcare changes have helped some individuals, etc.

    I do wish he had kept Summers OUT of his cabinet, and had brought Krugman in, and I don’t think his environmental advisers are really doing their jobs, but HILLARY kicks butt!

  34. Wendy City says:

    I have lost a lot of respect for Matt from these comments. I seriously doubt Matt would say this to Obama’s face. Questioning someone’s manhood. Is not cool. Obama ok’d the killing of Osama bin laden. The most hated man in the world. Something that bush could NOT do. He passed healthcare against major opposition. He ended an unjust war. He repealed DADT so that all in the military can love freely without repercussion. Matt sounds like a spoiled little brat that is not getting exactly what he wants so he is going to whine about it

  35. DesertRose says:

    70% taxes, and yet one of the highest standards-of-living in the world. We all think that we need an untold number of choices to be truly free. I disagree. Yes, 70% of her money is gone, but she gets paid a higher wage, and never has to worry about education or healthcare. Once you start doing the math, you will realize that we pay far more taxes than you think. My example: all of my hubby’s payroll taxes add up to 34% (and we have kids to write off). Not complaining, he makes a good living, and this is just how it is. With the 66% that is left (around 70k a year), we pay taxes on all purchases at 7.25% (not including food). We pay $5,200 a year in property taxes. I pay the state of California almost $2000 a year to keep one big diesel truck and two newish cars registered. So yeah, don’t think we are free here because we pay (depending on who you are)less taxes.

  36. Peace says:

    Wow free is really all one wants to hear.Let me explain nothing in life is free. Either you purchase these things or the government provides them to you after taking most of your money.Along with them taking your money they provide you with lots of red tape.Control how and when you can get said services. They did a great job with many things they control. POST Office anyone?
    So would those of you who say the services that will be supplied are free please wake the heck up.
    What this is is highway robbery. Anyone who is driven and makas more Money will be taxed more to help pay for services for people who are less than driven. I paY for my own stuff. Poor me.
    I want thingS from my gOvermenT For free. As if.
    Grow up.This entitlement thinking is just a slippery slope. Matt thinks of himself as a deep thinker. his views are directly related to being raised by his mother who is a teacher.
    She is a victim.She is required to feel this way. Public school teachers are required to teach these things. and Matt soaked it up. Hey Matt sell your expensive house or open it up to the less fortunate.

  37. Victoria says:

    And as far as celebrities and politics go, yes they should stay out of certain topics. I really don’t want to hear about their bullshit complaints, suggestions, comments, or whatever when we stupidly pay them millions of dollars to entertain us and our public servants can barely keep their mortgage afloat.

    Shut your entitled ass up. If you grew up poor and made it to Hollywood and become a movie star (not a working actor) and you’re spending $60,000 on Birkin bags and then wanna bitch about Obama, or any other politician, you can have a damn seat because you are also part of the problem.

  38. Cerulean says:

    Matt voiced what a lot of people think. He could have been more articulate when getting his point across.
    Obama doesn’t even need to campaign. The
    Repubs are doing all the work for him. Bunch of crackpot loons that motley group.

  39. Elizabeth says:

    Dear Asli,Denmark sounds great but you’re starting to gloat, dearest. I come from Canada – free health care but no TV on buses. Damn!

    • layla says:

      Im from Australia… and agree. I can not for the life of me comprehend the American medical or school systems. In Australia, both are free (or, as in the case of education, paid for by the Governement until you start earning a certain income, then, a percentile is taken back to slowly pay off the course fees – at a flat rate, no interest).

      I now live in Canada, and whilst better than the States, the lack of free education boggles my mind. And healthcare is only free depending on Province!

    • Naye in VA says:

      Dear Asli,

      I would love to be a spoiled brat lol

  40. renata says:

    matt is right about what he says, and he’s doing the right thing by speaking up about it. After all, he started out a big supporter of Obama (as was I), and he now sees a need to correct those words of support. That’s fair enough, and I give him credit for admitting his mistake. Obama has been a huge disappointment. While some of that may be due to circumstances beyond his control, some of it is surely due to the fact that he’s shown himself to be spineless and inexperienced. I’m glad Damon spoke up!

  41. Nymeria says:

    Obama not only extended the Patriot Act, he added some lovely new parts to it that made it even more intrusive & police state-like.

    Women’s reproductive rights are eroding even further under his presidency.

    The requirement that all Americans purchase health insurance is not Constitutional. We’re going to be FORCED to put money in the pockets of HMO bastards, who will then reduce the quality of care offered! What the hell? (I love Nancy Pelosi’s statement that “[W]e have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”)

    Yes, Bush started all the bailout bullshit, but who continued it? Could it be… Obama?

    Ron Paul 2012 for me!

  42. Jover says:

    Sara this isn’t about free speech, rights or anything of the sort – the opinions of celebutards can be written on the wind and running water – are the opinions of physicists, day car workers, electricians, plumbers not equally worthy – with few exceptions most of these people are dumb, self-centered and poorly educated, poorly read – funny, we had better movies in general in the 40s,50s,60s, when actors/actresses acted now we have pseudo-hollywood savants and tons of crummy movies. If you take political guidance from any, any celeb you shouldn’t go out of the house without a chaperone.

  43. Coucou says:

    OBAMA 2012!!!!

  44. Kim says:

    He drank the Obama Hope punch just like majority of people. He should be apologizing for being so naive buying into the hope b.s. and voting for Obama not just blaming Obama for everything. Typical liberal who likes to complain but what is he doing to change anything? nothing. Sad thing is we will most likely be stuck with, Obama do nothing, for another term simply because the rest of the contenders are terrible also.

    • maymae says:

      He can’t blame Obama because he did NOT actually read the fine print. Obama was always a middle of the roader, always. Did Damon just wake up in 2008 and decide to vote for the first time in his life and now he is upset because real politics is’nt what it appears to be?

  45. truthful says:

    who cares what he thinks.

    If all of the celebs in LA, put their money where their mouth is–they could bail their OWN state out of trouble.

    talk the talk but keep the money in your pockets–please spare me.

    HIS own state government is barely making payroll each month, he’s full of it.

  46. T.C. says:

    It’s much more complicated than Damon is making it out to be. The President is only ONE branch of government. He doesn’t have any more power than congress. He has to deal with not just the “say no to everything” Repu butblicans but also the blue-dog Democrats who are essentially Republicans. Still he has done a lot more than people give him credit for he just doesn’t go around beating his chest like Mitt “I saved the Olympics” Romney. However I have no problem with Damon speaking out his anger. Presidents need fires up their ass by their disappointed supporters. They shouldn’t take our votes for granted. Yes he is a famous rich star but he is also a citizen.

  47. madpoe says:

    Well someone is gonna be audited pretty soon! I’ll send some STFU stamps to ya Matt!

  48. anne_000 says:

    Dear Matt:

    There are 3 branches of govt. The President can’t reign all by himself by just signing executive orders all day long, especially concerning bills that have anything to do with any govt money including spending or cutting.

    If you want things to happen, then remember that the structure is that first it must pass congress especially when dealing with bills affecting govt money in any way. Only then can the President sign those bills into law. Ex: the payroll tax cut issue, which Boehner refuses to allow a vote on in the House, and instead had his fellow Republicans walk out off the floor, shut the door, & turn off the mics & the cameras while the Democratic Minority Whip Hoyer & another Democrat were asking for the payroll tax cuts to be voted on.

    So, if you have issues with what’s been happening this political year, then last year, before the elections that won the House for the Republicans & got in more Republicans in the Senate, you should have been more actively stomping for more people to vote Democratic.

    Also, if you will remember, when the President asked to meet with both political party leaders of the House & Senate, the Republicans at first refused, then walked out when they finally did show up. And the President has been doing a lot of bully pulpit speech stomping, but the Executive Branch has only so much power. It’s very limited. Also, when the President called for a joint session of Congress, the Republican leaders refused saying it would fall on the same day of one of the 21 or so GOP ‘debates’ as if any one of them was more important than solving our national problems. For the past 3 years, the Republicans have put up more filibusters than ever before. They have truly become “the party of NO!” Their leaders, including Sen. Maj. leader McConnell are shown on TV saying that their ONLY goal is to make sure the President is a one-term president – as in, they’re not concerned with the economy or solving any issues. As the Republicans in the media have said, they need to crash the economy & make things so harsh that the elections go their way. This is their stated agenda.

    So, again, the true key is and has always been the political power in both houses of Congress. Start there with your complaints. Sorry we don’t have an Imperial Presidency. Are you one of those people who, like Michelle Bachmann, believe that the President has such far-reaching powers that he can even change the price of gasoline to $2/gal if ONLY he wanted to? Uh No. That’s because our governmental system is set up with 535 politicians in Congress vs 1 President.

    • Trek Girl says:

      This one of the best, if not the best, comments of this whole thread.

      I appreciate your understanding of how the government works, and your specific examples.

      I hope people read this comment, because it would go a long way in helping people understand what is really going on.

    • NM9005 says:

      I have been educated by your post…
      Thank you!

  49. bea says:

    I’ll agree that “O” has been a bit of a disappointment, BUT he’s done a lot of great things, ESPECIALLY considering the pile of shiz he was handed.

    I think during his second term (he’ll win – they obvs don’t want to win or they would have run someone who wasn’t INSANE), he’ll be ballsy-er because he won’t have to worry about getting re-elected.

    What we ALL (Rep, Dem, Lib, whatevs) need to join together against is WAR and the HUGE COST OF WARS. Just think what things would be like if we had invested all the Iraq $ into the U.S.? Instead, Haliburton and those types get richer and more powerful. Until WE ALL CAN AGREE ON NO MORE WARS, it won’t matter who gets elected.

    BTW, he is not a good baldy!

    • lindsay says:

      In Sept, Obama authorized the assassination of an American citizen on foreign soil for SUSPECTED terrorist activity. This is not GOP spin. Obama directed targeted killing on Anwar al-Awlaki. Suspected of terrorism. That’s it.

      He recently signed off on a bill that gives the Federal government powers to override the Bill of Rights.

      That’s more than enough information on his campaign for re-election.

      • Mia says:

        well said.

      • JustBe says:

        I too am very disturbed by these actions of the Executive Office, but can you honestly say that any of the current GOP presidential candidates would have done differently? These orders that he signed were not drafted up just by his office or by him personally, but the suggestions were made by our military leaders for requesting specific powers that they feel they need to ‘keep the homeland safe’.
        I’m disgusted by our ever-present, no-end-in-sight War on Terrorism, but I also believe in my heart that, had McCain won or if one of the current crop of GOP hopefuls win, our war on terrorism will extend out to include Iran and Pakistan and probably a few other mostly brown, Muslim countries.
        I hate that we have to choose between two evils, but I pride myself on trying to recognize which one would be the worst.

  50. e.non says:

    it’s not a matter of having balls to get the job done. seems to me, hopey has accomplished so much:

    failure to protect the constitution of the united states of america — his sworn duty;

    the first u.s. president to order the assassination of an american citizen (and bonus kill of a 16yo son);

    undeclared war against yemen, pakistan, somalia … those freedom drones are surprisingly lethal…;

    the disinterest and easy capitulation in ensuring women have control over their own reproductive lives;

    banksters walk free, but medical marijuana operations (that have public and increasing state support) are raided, shut down and operators arrested;

    HUGE giveaways to bigger pharma and private insurers in order to gain ‘support’ for his healthcare law — that the supreme court is sure to void…. well, except for those provisions where you’ll be paying the highest drug and ins premiums ever…;

    and so much more ….

    • Jover says:

      We have not declared war against somalia, yemen, pakistan, you’re generalizations are lazy; we are killing totalitarian fascists, i.e, jihadists, that would slit our throats if they had half a chance. Al shabab is destroying somalia and their version of Islam is entirely contrary to what their traditions; your comments are continuing in the long tradition dating back to the bolshevik revolution of appeasement by other means; as much of the left/and right could not face the nature of totalitarian marxism and nazism they either become apologists for the regimes (the literature on this phenomena is vast) or they blamed their own democracies for the faults completely dismissing the evils of the regimes as imaginary. Apologists for totalitarian murderers are not very admirable, as George Orwell wrote war is evil, but it is not the only evil, and sometimes it is not the worst evil.

      • lindsay says:

        How people are treated in other countries is none of our affair. We do not have the obligation to “spread freedom”, we have an obligation to protect our own. Bombing countries for mistreating their people goes against our own traditions and values. That is not how our country works. You are correct, we do not have an official declaration of war from congress which makes these bombings illegitimate under Constitutional law.

        There is little to no benefit to an American agenda to intervene in totalitarian fascists regimes unless we are directly threatened. Since we are not land locked to any of these countries and their abilities to attack us are severely limited, you’re simply promoting the neo-con line of endless warfare and directionless self defense. We do not have the finances to fund this whooping it up around the planet to challenge these regimes anyway.

  51. Tweakspotter says:

    You know I never really liked Matt Damon…until now. BRAVO! Finally somebody with some common sense in Hollywood. Obama is the worst president EVER…period.

    “a bit of a disappointment” is an understatement. ONE AND DONE!

    • Tiffany says:

      If you think Obama is the worst President ever, you didn’t pay attention to the guy that was running things before him.

      • lindsay says:

        Bush approved torture and war and sh-t on the Constitution, Obama approves assassination and war and sh-ts on the Constitution.

        The only difference between Bush and Obama is that Obama is running for reelection.

  52. The low percentage rate at the polls says it all. Give a shit about your Country and VOTE!!!This is our Country…remember that.

  53. lrm says:

    too bad people cannot realize that this is classic divide and conquer two party strategy-both parties are ultimately guided by the same forces/people/power. They just appeal to different groups using different strategies. It keeps everyone relatively sedate and with another group to blame everything on. And with a focus for their ‘activism’-lol. Sad but true-we’re all being duped, no matter which way you slice it.

    And even if Obama or another politician really believed their own words/hype, he/she has little power or ‘mandate’ to actually do all that he/she would like.

    And in a less sinister/conspiratorial but more obvious observation: Politics IS compromise. The president is elected to represent the entire nation, not just one group of people. And 53% for example is not carte blanche, I’m sorry. I’m just saying: It’s unrealistic to think that these people can just march in and implement everything they promised. It cannot happen, unless you are bush/cheney, of course, and then you circumvent law. [sorry, had to say it.]
    but i’m not democrat, either, so relax.

    The problem is these parties go extreme to get knee jerk reactions, and we cannot discuss issues with any degree of objectivity. maybe newt has something reasonable to say about something, for example, or nadar, but noone will listen, b/c their ‘logic for getting there’ doesn’t jive with said listener.

    This paradigm is what needs to shift before anything else will, IMO.

    so Damon is just pandering t the status quo system, but th inks he is cutting edge.

    It’s like people who listen to NPR, and think they are cutting edge or gasp- ‘more enlightened or evolved’ than everyone else. Puleez.

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      It is a sham. A shell game to divide and conquer; keep us distracted with petty squabbles so our freedom erodes and the military industrial complex fosters fear and paranoia. We are the frogs being boiled in increments in a bubbling pot.

      My friend, now a U.S. citizen who grew up under communist Romania, told me that he’s more afraid of our government than he was of the communist leaders during his teen years. We’re both 50.

  54. E says:

    Actually, people like this annoy me…the tend to see the world in black and white, not shades of gray. Obama overturned Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, more or less saved the automobile industry, finally pulled everyone out of Iraq, death or Osama Bin Laden, major health care reforms, and more. He’s not Superman, but he’s done a hell of a lot. Sure, I wish he had been more firm at times. But to say he hasn’t done anything is total bullshit and ignorant as hell. His major failings are Afghanistan and the economy.

  55. Sakyiwaa says:

    I gotta say: American politics is a thing of beauty.

  56. Mia says:

    Matt Damon – my new hero!

    Ron Paul 2012.

  57. Rachel says:

    Sign me up for that system! I have no fear of high taxes if it means a greater quality of life.

  58. sarah says:

    I might get trashed for this comment, but I’m not voting for Obama or anyone else next year, as I don’t feel it really makes any difference. Sorry.

    • Jover says:

      Actually sarah that is a defensible position. In 2008 well known catholic philosopher alisdair mcintyrie (sic) defended such a position of non-voting because morally he disagreed with obama re abortion and was opposed to McCain’s foreign policy. THere is no moral requirement to vote, and if the choices are unsavory non-voting can be a moral option.

      • theaPie says:

        That has been my philosophy for the past few presidential terms, and I thought I was just being lazy, or somehow un-American.

  59. Miss Thang says:

    That is an insane amount of taxes. For that money you get healthcare, education, A/C and internet and television in public places. A LOT of places here in the States have free internet, no taxes needed for that. WiFi is everywhere. We have public schools, sure they’re terrible, but they’re there! We only have to cover book rental. No free universities, but they are helped by the gov to keep costs down and our gov offers LOTS of assistance to people who can’t afford to go without it. We also have medicaid for low income families who can’t afford health insurance and here in my state we have a gap coverage that goes up to families making over 55,000 a year. That’s not exactly low income. I hate that some people can’t get medical coverage for pre-existing conditions, so I’m happy that Obama has taken care of that for us. The thing we like here in America is the CHOICE. WE want to decide individually how to spend our money. I know lots of people who don’t want or need medical insurance because they have never in their lives seen a Dr and wont for the rest of them. I don’t agree with that choice, but I think they have a right to have that choice and I think it’s important that they are not forced to spend their money on things they don’t want and will never use.
    If it cost 70% of our income to pay for school, insurance and internet I would be pretty upset about that cost. I think that’s an outrageous amount of money for those things! If I add in our student loan payments (both college educated), all taxes and health insurance we are still under 40% of our income.

    • Sonya says:

      Completely agreed. I’m from Moscow (now in Chicago) and my family knows what it’s like to have those types of taxes, fees, and laws imposed on them. Everyone’s been giving examples of how truly ‘un-free’ we are over here; ‘first world problems’ is what crosses my mind. Face it, if you’re from here, you probably wouldn’t pick anywhere but the US to live for the rest of your life.

      On a side note, I’m not a Republican or a Democrat; these parties have changed too dramatically for me in the past decade and I really don’t give a shit about picking the lesser of the two evils.

    • Miss Thang says:

      Oh, I also want to add that I have never been on any form of public transportation that didn’t have A/C. That’s like a human necessity lol. No need to pay extra for that!

  60. Cali says:

    Matt Damon is such a douche. I’m sure this delusional actor has ALL the right answers. He is trapped in the same pretentious know-it-all closet that Sean Penn is in BUT I actually have some respect for Sean Penn because at least he ACTS the part of someone who wants better for people and isn’t just in the comfort of the Good Ol USA with sh*t steaming out his mouth. STFU Matt Damon, every time you speak about politics you look more stupid!!!

  61. Dylan says:

    U stupid Americans voted for Obama, now enjoy it! xD

  62. crys737 says:

    celebrities should not get involved in politics if they have no educational background to speak of on the subject and if they have never actively provided any political service or work in the field.

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      Completely Disagree! You sound like you think only ‘educated’ land owners should be allowed to vote. Are you against the ‘motor voter’ laws that automatically register everyone, including the people you think shouldn’t be allowed to have a political opinion?

  63. Tiffany says:

    Damon completely ignores that thing called CONGRESS that actually is supposed to pass laws, but instead has resorted to record breaking fillabusters, record breaking stalling of judicial nominiees, etc.

  64. Joe Shmoe says:

    What do you expect when puppets are constantley elected and reelected every 4 years.

  65. ZenB!tch says:

    Americans don’t want it – 70% taxes is one reason. Another reason is that we are historically an individualist nation and yet another reason is we are not all Danes (or any other ethnic group). I know you are not all Danes either but you are a majority of Danes and in more homogeneous countries universal healthcare is seen as a taking care of your family type thing.

  66. Jordan says:

    I hate when celebrities think they are ‘experts’ on politics just b/c they are famous. He doesn’t offer any solutions or how Obama could have gotten more things accomplished, unless he thinks Obama simply should have dropped his pants and showed Congress his ball sac? Wasn’t it George W. Bush who had the balls to get us into war with Iraq, despite the fact that bin Laden was in Afghanistan? Yeah, clearly balls are all it takes.

  67. Mac says:

    The Danes can thank the USA for their happiness, without whom they would currently be speaking German.

    • EmDee says:

      I freakin’ HATE it when Americans say that! Yes, you helped the Allies win the war but, what, now every time the opportunity arises, you have to lord it over us? It is such a completely disrespectful comment and an insult to those, including my grandfathers, who fought and witnessed such horrendous and unspeakable atrocities.

    • Miss Thang says:

      We’re a bigger, more wealthy country. That doesn’t mean we are better in every way or that we have everything right. No matter what we have done for other countries it doesn’t make ours perfect. This is a silly thing to say, a terrible argument and it makes Americans look bad.
      Also, who says they wouldn’t love to be a part of Germany? It’s not a bad place and by now he would have been gone anyway!

  68. Callumna says:

    The left is hellbent on single POV, full on domination. Never one second of rest from your unrelenting inability to keep your traps shut about religion and politics even when it’s not appropriate.

    Elle Magazine to spout off? It’s obnoxious as is not being able to keep your politics out of the office, and a nice dinner, or a gossip site.

    It’d be nice to not have these POV’s shoved down our throats. Just left v. lefter. Such seething hate for any way that people don’t conform to the lefty’s particular interpretation of leftism. This one is especially ridiculous since he is so corporate and employs so many peons in his palatial estates that the idea he’s not the one per cent is a sham.

    I do remember when all the gossip shows and late night shows didn’t offer the exact same unrelenting group think politics of an elite determined to tell us what to do.

    It’s obscene that you all can’t keep your traps shut about religion and politics anymore. Especially since you have no desire to discuss, only to shove and push your POV down everyone else’s throats even when it veers into being truly insulting and intolerant. Really, there are appropriate forums and yet you use gossip sites and late night shows for this now.

    If every day since 2008 every media outlet showing your thriller/comedy/music whatever all suddenly began shoving a single view down your throat you’d find it obscene, overboard and obnoxious. Cuz it IS.

    Couple it with most news organizations now openly backing one POV and you get propaganda. A propagandist media onslaught from the intolerant left.

  69. kk says:

    I read the comments about freedom to choose etc in the US. As an Australian, I just look at the society in that country and think how unfortunate it is that they don’t care about the poor. I would happily pay 70% of my income if everyone in my society was guaranteed healthcare, education and a certain standard of living. My parents earn a substantial amount and they agree that they would happily pay MORE tax to ensure that others had access to health and education and other welfare services. I think it is all about the mentality of different countries. In Australia, I notice that the working and probably the lower middle classes are the most reluctant to contribute to the welfare of other people ( you only need to see the pathetic asylum seeker issue in this country to realise how stupid our politicians and these classes of people are) but those who are upper middle class etc are very concerned about the poor. My point is that maybe everyone should just be a little more compassionate- I saw in a comment above that a lady can’t afford her cancer treatments/checkups etc- I cannot even imagine that happening in Australia and I am so sad that ANYONE in a supposedly first world country lives in these conditions.

  70. Feebee says:

    It’s easy to say stuff like that. And I get it. It’s been disappointing. But how many times (in all countries with democratically elected governments) have voters been promised things that were never deliverable or the candidate once in office got the real story?

    I believe an impassioned, intelligent person like Damon is exactly the kind of person you want entering politics. But he’s smart enough to know if it wasn’t harder than it looked there’d be more idiots there than there are now. The congress is a joke. Even some Republicans don’t recognise their own party.

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      Callumna: You sound like a snotty elitist who looks down on everyday people discussing politics of all stripes. The internet is our Town Hall, and that is exactly why we must keep this conversation alive and prevent the powers that be from passing loss that undercut a free internet. Gossip sites, comments, late night shows that don’t share your political views are the wrong venues?

      You have it all wrong. Freedom flourishes when it expresses itself in any type of media. If you disagree with the far left, fine, but it’s not fine to wish that speech and political expression were restricted to what YOU judge is the appropriate venue. Why are you so hell bent on closing down everyday people connecting and working to make a difference? No one is shoving anything down anyone’s throat. If you don’t like views different than your own, then I suggest you only seek out newspapers, political magazines, and “news” stations that parrot back to you only the beliefs or politics that mirror your own viewpoint.

      We must be vigilant against our rights being stripped away, and I say bring back the Town Hall, the Internet. We actually need to have direct representation instead of the electoral college running the show.

      • Callumna says:

        “Sloane” — is literally an arrogant elitist’s name. But name calling is all you’ll really have in the end.

        Not being able to keep your yap shut about politics in any circumstance is still revolting to me.

        Deal with it. An opinion that differs from yours.

  71. crtb says:

    Well those Republicans better hurry up and find somebody with some balls, because so far they haven’t been able to find anyone. And it looks like ballest Obama will be serving a second term!

  72. Trek Girl says:

    @Asli: I totally agree. I do not think I could have said it better myself.

  73. wunder says:

    I’m voting for Matt Damon!!!

    Write him in ya’ll.

  74. Wendy City says:

    I have lost a lot of respect for Matt Damon. I seriously doubt this is something that he would say to Obama’s face. While the president was taking a major risk and giving the ok to kill the most hated man on earth-Osama Bin Laden. Providing the country with adequate healthcare and ending an unjust 10 year war – Matt is over in the corner whining because he hasnt gotten his way. He has made himself look like an ass resorting to a cheap shot.

  75. sally says:

    Hillary should have been the democratic nominee and people like Matt Damon are embarrassed that they didn’t realize it. Hillary never would have put up with the republican BS like Obama has.
    Furthermore, it is completely disrespectful to talk about the president’s “balls”, Matt Damon— no matter what your position is. So you picked the wrong candidate, don’t be a douche about it.

  76. Sloane Wyatt says:

    You have some great points, so I had to check out the Danes Happiness Index and it read like a primer on what Americans really want from their elected officials.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6563639.stm

    Quite eye opening, I hope our country is realizing how many pubs AND a lot of dems are only interested in KEEPING bipartisanship divisions on the boil so we won’t notice our rights stripped from us and the sheer mass of wealth that is being shifted to them, the corrupt greedy 1%.

    • gg says:

      I too am very disturbed at the hate and bipartisanship. Nobody seems to want to work together, which I know is endemic in politics in general, but it’s gotten way worse from where I sit. Seems like they’re enjoying the vitriol so much that they don’t want it to go away.

      Also: Thanks very much for the nice wishes, Asli – I am well at the moment, fingers crossed, since chemo last year. Crumbcake, my heart goes out to you. I hope your brain tumor goes away and never comes back. 🙁 Treatment has come a long way in the last few years.

  77. Sunnyjyl says:

    I just have to say that I am very impressed with the lively, intelligent debate/conversation going on in this thread–all sides. Gives me hope.

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      The civil give and take gives me hope too. I think we are waking up and the USA could have ‘an American Spring’. Regular people are taking it to the streets and no amount of under reporting is going to put us back in the box of being led like sheeples.

      My worry is that individuals who speak up and demonstrate against the power plutocracy will be made examples of, hassled by dirty tricks, or entombed somewhere because they were labeled the T – rist word; now it’s legal for the military to arrest an ordinary citizen with no phone call, no Miranda, no lawyer, and hold them indefinitely.

      I’m scared by posting my political views that I’m next for warrantless wiretapping or worse. My husband says don’t make waves and They won’t bother you. Chilling.

  78. Mario says:

    Being incredibly arrogant and having a nasty temper are not attractive. Matt Damon is one of those actors that has a massive ego and over bloated ideas about his own importance. Instead of bitching about the president, why don’t you acknowledge the role the republicans have played in keeping the country in the toilet. It’s not like Obama hasn’t tried to make things better.

  79. Criss says:

    Geez Matt, you Where my favorite actor, but you know we have to stick together. There is enough smack talking lies on the other side. Not good comments for the coming election, did you slip to the dark side?

  80. Jover says:

    Lindsey your comments make no sense and go off on a tangent: why do you assume I’m a neocon, I’m an independent, we are not intervening in totalitarian regimes, in somalia we are attempting to prevent totalitarians from taking power slaughtering innocent human beings and using it as a platform to attack many other targets. You’re letting ideology get in the way of clarity. Furthermore, it is western democracies and anyone in the arab/muslim world that disagrees with the jihadists that are being attacked – do you not understand the nature of totalitarian movements. Legal niceties are fine for domestic stuff; facing totalitarian opponents is quite different. You’ve lived too long in an affluent comfortable democracy to see this. Finally, I am not promoting endless war; don’t put words in my mouth, look up how much defense spending is versus entitlements relative to GDP.Our out of control entitlements are killing us, not defense spending. Please none of our liberties have been lost, you exaggerate anyone coming to this country and ignorant of the world these last ten years would be hard pressed to say we have lost are liberties. Do you actually have any conception of what life was like in hitler’s germany stalin’s russia – no. THose were tyrannies what we have as civilians are mild nuisances.

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      @ Jover – “….Legal niceties are fine for domestic stuff; facing totalitarian opponents is quite different. You’ve lived too long in an affluent comfortable democracy to see this….. look up how much defense spending is versus entitlements relative to GDP.Our out of control entitlements are killing us, not defense spending. Please none of our liberties have been lost, you exaggerate anyone coming to this country and ignorant of the world these last ten years would be hard pressed to say we have lost are liberties.”

      Surely you jest, Jover, there is soooo much military spending, money going to black ops, and companies like Haliburton that we are never told about. With whole segments of the ‘military’ spending cloaked in secrecy, we citizens have no idea whose corrupt pockets are getting lined. These entitlements you speak of, *begin sarcasm* I’m certain you mean *end sarcasm* Big Oil Subsidies, Bank Bail Outs, Big Agribusiness Corporations squeezing out the last free people – the family farmers beholden to no one, and all the other welfare for the wealthy programs we currently have in place, right?

      • Jover says:

        Sloane wyatt this is why political discussion is impossible you don’t respond to my points and simply ignore everything I say to go on your diatribe; where are your statistics as a percentage of GDP entitlement spending is twice what military spending is; Yes, i’m opposed to the bailouts of big oil,agribusiness, etc. but SS, Medicare, Medicaid are where the money’s at; read economist Paul Samuelson social security has become middle class welfare in need of depserate reform. And you simply refuse to face the nature, tactics, ideology of Al Aqueda and related affiliations and what their victory in places like somalia would mean; If you’re going to address my statements, address them, please don’t go off on your own rant. Thank you. Finally, name a specific, SPECIFIC, right we have “lost” under bush or Obama. In truth none. When you have no argument you exaggerate the imaginary to save the premise. Further, would you prefer a world of dictatorships or democracies I prefer one of democracies – democracies don’t make war on one another. You dismiss the means to the ends you want – peace – because of your ideological dogmatism. Do you read anything I’m not talking left or right conspiratorialist nut job ramblings. Please tell me you’re not one of those types.

    • lindsay says:

      “Legal niceties are fine for domestic stuff; facing totalitarian opponents is quite different. ”

      No way Jose. The very basis of our country spring from legal niceties. We are not a democracy, we are a Constitutional Republic. How we conduct ourselves domestically and internationally is subject to our Constitution. Get it? Rule of law.

      “Do you actually have any conception of what life was like in hitler’s germany stalin’s russia?”

      Of course not. I am an American and I looking to protect my way of life. You are far to eager to waste American blood and money for people who do not want our help and resent our influence in their countries. American forces are not the armed wing of the U.N. We have no business bombing Libya under Obama as we had no business bombing Iraq under Bush or Clinton.

      A strong, well funded national defense is not Constitutionally allowed to include spending on nation building and regime change. But you go ahead and play war games with the neighbors and see how well we hold up when there is an actual homeland attack and our military is off in whereverthehellistan avoiding IEDs and getting shot at. Cause historically it’s worked out really well for us when we send Marines on peacekeeping missions in Somalia and our countrymen are burned and dragged in the streets or when Reagan was asked to send Marines to Beirut only to be blown up on another peacekeeping mission. regime change? The Shah was a good idea?

      To say we have not lost liberties under Bush or Obama is ridiculous. Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, find out for yourself how it negates the Bill of Rights.

  81. Bee says:

    One of my facebook friends posted “President Obama could walk on water and some people would complain that he can’t swim.
    I’m a lifelong democrat but I always support whoever wins the presidency. When President Bush stood there with his arm around that fireman at ground zero I felt proud. This country should support our president. We are divided because of his race. Yeah I said it.

  82. Sloane Wyatt says:

    lindsay says:
    December 22, 2011 at 3:17 pm
    How people are treated in other countries is none of our affair. We do not have the obligation to “spread freedom”, we have an obligation to protect our own. Bombing countries for mistreating their people goes against our own traditions and values. That is not how our country works. You are correct, we do not have an official declaration of war from congress which makes these bombings illegitimate under Constitutional law.
    There is little to no benefit to an American agenda to intervene in totalitarian fascists regimes unless we are directly threatened. Since we are not land locked to any of these countries and their abilities to attack us are severely limited, you’re simply promoting the neo-con line of endless warfare and directionless self defense. We do not have the finances to fund this whooping it up around the planet to challenge these regimes anyway.

    @Lindsay: Excellent post. Agreed.

  83. Str8Shooter says:

    Matt Damon really needs to take some college level (heck, HIGH SCHOOL level)courses in Civics or Political Science. Like that other miserable fuck Sean Penn, all this tool seems to do is trash Obama any chance he gets, as if somehow HE would have some brilliant plans to fix the country and get the Rebuplitards to vote the way HE wanted them to.

    When you have people like that DOUCHE SUPREME Mitch McConnell going around saying that their main goal is to unseat the President…not fix the problems the country is facing, mind you…is it any wonder Obama has had a rough go of trying to do the right things for this country? Or how about cleaning up the disastrous mess that the former idiot left for him?

    Matt Damon, shut the fuck up and go back to your Boring (sorry, BOURNE) movies.

  84. Pauline Bernoski says:

    He is right! Obama is the worst president we ever had!! He sucks the big one!

  85. Angel says:

    Ooookay… Having a hardcore ‘don’t read the comments’ moment right now. A first for this site.

  86. BerMan says:

    Opinions, Opinions who’s got them? you? Great then it’s yours.
    Happy Holidays , blog, blog, blog, blog. Cheers!

  87. sally says:

    Matt Damon needs a haircut.

  88. Sloane Wyatt says:

    This is a political post, and so many people want to influence and educate each other. I enjoy being wrong because then I’ve learned something. Our president is not perfect, but he’s the best candidate in the field. Like Matty, it’s only my opinion.

    Warrant-less wiretapping, confiscation of all your worldly goods for the crime of drug possession, and the mass imprisonment of our population are a few of my least favorite things.

    “Indeed, the United States leads the world in producing prisoners, a reflection of a relatively recent and now entirely distinctive American approach to crime and punishment. Americans are locked up for crimes — from writing bad checks to using drugs — that would rarely produce prison sentences in other countries. And in particular they are kept incarcerated far longer than prisoners in other nations.” – http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html?pagewanted=all

    I don’t think I’m a “nut job”, but how could I tell if I was one? 🙂 My husband and I are on the opposite ends of the political spectrum, but we still love each other. Merry Holiday Season.

  89. Riri says:

    I actually appreciate actors/ any person who is actually real about what he thinks and is willing to take the hit than another boring PR campaign for another movie and playing it safe.

    I am puzzled about Damon though.
    I can’t really understand him as a person and his personal choices (his marriage, his “caring a bit too much for” and interfering with Ben A. love life etc.

    As for Damon disillisionment of Obama- why did you choose to get behind him in the first place?
    His record was meager, he didn’t even complete 2 years as a senator when he went on his bid for presidency and had very very little experience as a leader of any sort (lack thereof- CEO/ military/ governor or any other experiecne that may help prepare him or tell us something about him as a leader).

    Why did Damon choose to overlook Hilary’s potential or support any other candidate?
    That was HIS choice.

    I suspect Damon, and others, chose to go with the GUY and ignore the GIRL that had more to offer, with no other reason other than he is a GUY.
    I suspect there is an ingrained chauvinism in him that is very much prevalent in Hollywood.

    I hope I am wrong.

  90. Cerulean says:

    Great discourse.

    All this Ron Paul stuff….oy. He’s a bigot and we don’t need a leader with his track record in charge of anything. It won’t happen anyway but he’s clearly unacceptable and far too extreme. Not gonna happen.

  91. mainstream says:

    In fairness to those people who’ve been getting whacked for voting Obama, who else could they’ve voted for instead? McCain or Clinton? Puh-lease.

  92. AM says:

    Like everyone else famous actors are entitled to their opinion but he just sounds like a spoilt child

  93. lala says:

    matt damon should not be talking about anybody needing balls. he has none. how about he stops speaking about things he knows nothing about because it only makes him seem less intelligent than he already looks. i’m so happy that i do not value this loser’s opinion. ummm what is it that you’ve successfully accomplished in your line of work? i’m happy your pansy a** will not be voting for obama this upcoming election! i hope the republican candidate you decide to back likes sucking your c**k just the way i hear you like it!

  94. Gypsy says:

    As soon as I read what he said, I knew I couldn’t go to anymore of his movies and apparently many other people felt the same way.
    His “Zoo” movie sang like a stone at the Box Office.

  95. Luci says:

    Matt’s rant about Obama sounds like a love affair gone bad. He’s heartbroken and bitter because Obama didn’t do what he wanted him to do. Typical.