‘Jennifer Aniston is pregnant!’ says Star Mag, but her publicist says ‘not so much’

Star Magazine put Jennifer Aniston’s uterus on their cover this week. Don’t bash Star Mag too much – this week is really dead when it comes to the tabloids. I think the presidential election kind of eclipsed nearly everything in the gossip world, and as such, the Kardashians took most of the tabloid covers this week. So, it’s time to speculate again about Aniston’s womb. Star’s basic story is “Aniston is pregnant because her belly isn’t concave.” Star parses out some ridiculous details, like “Jennifer asked Courteney Cox to be the godmother” and “it’s a girl!” and “Jennifer wants a safari-themed nursery.” Why “safari” you ask? Because Jen and Justin Theroux are planning a “secret African wedding!” Did Star get their wires crossed with Brangelina or something? Usually fictitious African weddings are all Brangelina.

Anyway, Jennifer’s publicist thought it was important enough to deny this tabloid story directly. Huvane went to US Weekly and declared the story “false”. He said: “It’s just another fabrication! She was just at LACMA and she certainly does not look pregnant. When has Star ever been right?” He’s referring to these photos of Aniston, in which she wore a slithery-looking black dress with lots of cleavage. Is it weird that he referenced those photos? It feels weird. It feels too specific. That being said, I don’t believe that she’s pregnant, nor do I believe that she will be pregnant at any point in the near future. Maybe she’ll adopt. Maybe. At some point. Not right now.

Meanwhile, we’re still waiting for Aniston’s publicist to deny this story. And we’re still waiting for an apology for when she said “retard”.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

47 Responses to “‘Jennifer Aniston is pregnant!’ says Star Mag, but her publicist says ‘not so much’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Micki says:

    “When has Star ever been right?”

    I KNEW it, it’s Justin, who’s pregnant, not Jen!

  2. Tuxedo Cat says:

    I hope she is…but this is about the fifteenth maybe….

  3. Bad Irene says:

    Why say anything? So does that mean if she doesn’t deny any further stories that make the tabloids we can presume they are true?

  4. anneesezz says:

    Drew Barrymore had her baby last month so how old are those photos? The boobs are tell tale sign and they don’t look any bigger than usual. Everyone seems to assume she doesn’t want kids but maybe she can’t conceive naturally.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      If Jen had a problem conceiving, she would have used that information for added sympathy during the 2005 divorce process. I don’t doubt that for an instant. Instead, she has often spoofed all of the media interest in her womb, which started circa 2002.

      No doubt Jen told Brad before they married that she wanted kids (why else would a man who so obviously wanted kids marry a woman with no interest in having them?). Yes, it’s a fact that she’s said (often) since 2005 that she wants kids. But not once in the last eight years has she said, or had her PR guru say, that she can’t conceive naturally.

      I find it interesting that her fans are still using that supposition for her, yet she has yet to use it herself.

  5. Janet says:

    If I had a nickel for every time the tabloids said this woman’s been pregnant, I could retire rich.

  6. Sara says:

    What if she has tried and can’t have a baby? This would be a constant painful reminder. Womb watch for women past 35 is just insensitive imo because you don’t know what COULD possibly be going on with their fertility. It could also be that she just doesn’t want children and that is totally fine. maybe she will adopt or do surrogacy in the future but I just find this obsession with JA’s and other celebs to be beyond ridiculous.

    • mln76 says:

      I kind of doubt it only because the woman has joked about her fake pregnancies constantly from SNL when she was on Friends to down to her recent Smart Water commercial and has never shied away from mocking the constant rumors.
      More likely she’s just want of those women who doesn’t want kids nothing wrong with that…If she ever changes her mind there is always adoption and she can afford any fertility treatment up to surrogacy which if she has frozen eggs somewhere would be hers biologically.

  7. Elizabeth says:

    Truly a slow gossip week! But on the other hand, I don’t believe that she actually wants to have children of her own – or she would have had them by now. Nothing wrong with that choice but it makes these “oh, she’s just waiting for the right time/ guy, etc.” stories a bit tiring.

  8. andy says:

    A Jennifer Aniston thread…..YAY!!! Let the crazy begin.

  9. HannahF says:

    Jen is pregnant–a weekly occurrence and not a story. However, Huvane denying it–very unusual. Why Huvane bothered to reply is the real story. Normally I’d have to give a huge eye roll to anyone throwing Angie into a Jen thread but there she is to the left of JA with an earth mother versus anorexic spin.

  10. mln76 says:

    Personally I think she’s still trying to push the narrative that she’s sexy…Isn’t she playing a stripper in her next movie…Maybe the insinuation that she’s gaining weight pisses her off.

    What is she 43 or 44? At a certain point these covers are just a bit laughable(though not impossible I know) but I guess one more for old time sake right?

  11. Kim says:

    He never denied she started dating Justin when he was still with Heidi but he denied she was on a baby food diet.If she is pregnant she is only a few weeks along since People magazine just described a dinner with drinks she had last month.Star. magazine claims she has been pregnant with twins twice in the last year according to Gossip Cop

    .

  12. Madpoe says:

    The lackluster stories they are shoveling out is so sad!
    Ang is ana again.
    Jen is prego again.
    Shocking! Scandals!
    My cup of coffee this morning is more “shocking” and “scandalous”!

  13. Kasey says:

    LOL! Well maybe, I guess but I highly doubt it. I think if she REALLY wanted kids she has been in thepositionto have them (biological/adopted) by now. I think she’s enjoyed being child-free and isn’t looking to one cramping her style at this point.

  14. spinner says:

    The tabloids need to be more creative. Can’t they make up something new & different? People are getting tired of the same old story. If I was Jen, I wouldn’t bother to confirm or deny. Just ignore.

  15. I’d like to talk about that Ashton/Mila baby on the cover… I think that could be a go, her face is so strange and I know a lot of times faces are the real give away. You know, versus the whole she had a meal and they called it a baby!

  16. Amy C says:

    I just say this. This game is over for her now. @44 no one is expect her to play this game anymore. Nature stopped it. May be they should go with adoption stories from now on when they want to spin it for her.

  17. ladybert62 says:

    I dont believe until she says so.

  18. Christina says:

    I used to sort of feel sorry for Jen and the constant speculation about the contents of her uterus. But now I reckon she’s glad of it, as it keeps her in the news. After all, it’s not like she’s been making any exciting flims of late, is it?

  19. G says:

    Nothing is more aging then a womb-watch on a middle aged woman.

  20. Miss Kiki says:

    Normally I don’t buy into ANY of this stuff but I’m surprised that they’ve issued a direct denial- I can’t recall anytime recently when her camp have responded directly to a story. I think I’m turning into a conspiracy theorist because now I’m thinking maybe this time it’s true because they’ve gone out of the way to deny it. *adjusts tin foil hat*

  21. Melissa says:

    Wow – in those Daily Mail pics, Aniston’s dress is horrible. I’ve never understood that style of dress – who looks good in that? It drags your boobs down. And, I’m not shaming Drew, but I thought these pics must have been several months old – she still looks pregnant.

  22. Shelly says:

    Aniston’s always “meh”.

  23. Paloma says:

    Another bloggers aid it perfectly that she has the big purse and is holding her stomach on purpose to keep interest in speculation re: pregnancy.

  24. Anon says:

    Why do I think “Star” and Huvane are in cahoots together? Both have something to sell, desperately. Same old, same old.

  25. LurkeeLee says:

    The funny part is Huvane saying she doesn’t look pregnant, but her fans say she does with every new round of pics. That’s why the rags keep running the same old stories. They judge what people want to hear based on the web comments. They know their demographic.

  26. Tazina says:

    Of course she isn’t. I wish these rags would stop with that already. It’s getting old, really old.

  27. Amy625 says:

    I don’t know why this is a story. At least one tabloid says Jennifer is pregnant every week. I’m more annoyed that all of a sudden her fans are claiming she’s desperate for a baby but is infertile or having trouble. If that was true Jennifer wouldn’t claim for 10 years that she’s going to have a baby or constantly “joke” about the rumors. Also the comment about the event photo is too make Jennifer into a sex symbol.

  28. blaylock says:

    Once and for all i am telling you Jennifer Aniston cannot have children.She is not capable of having children.She cannot have biological children.She is infertile.Something is wrong with her reproduction system.Get it now>.?

  29. anom says:

    ja will never have children because she does not want them. at her age biology is not on her side for even one child unless she uses another woman’s egg(s).

  30. Misnomer says:

    Another fabrication? Huvane oughta know. Since he was publicly caught out a couple of times a few years back GIVING the stories to the tabloids, only then to deny them. Everything about Huvane and Aniston is a total fabrication.

  31. devil's advocate says:

    Yes we are still waiting for her apology
    for using the word “retard” and we are
    also still waiting for her to fund the
    $500,000 contribution to Haitian relief
    which she so publicly pledged!!!