Lindsay Lohan borrowed an expensive gown & returned it in cracked-out tatters

Remember this Theia gown Lindsay Lohan wore to the amfAR gala a few weeks ago? It looked like Roberto Cavalli and it was long and sparkly and it made Lindsay Lohan feel like a crack princess for one night only. Well, this gown has quite a torrid history already. Last week, Us Weekly claimed that Charlie Sheen (Captain Save-A-Ho) offered to go halfsies on the dress because he knows how much Lindsay Lohan loves to get dressed up in the finest clothes and prance around like she’s still the center of the universe. Apparently, Charlie called Phillip Bloch (stylist to the stars) and offered to pay for half of the dress for his good friend, the Cracken. I thought that was the end of it. But no. Us Weekly claims that Lindsay did NOT purchase the dress, she only borrowed it. And when she returned it, not only did the dress smell like vodka, crack smoke and crack drama, Lindsay had cut the dress in HALF.

Shear madness? Lindsay Lohan wore a gorgeous, beaded, floor-sweeping gown by Theia to an amFAR event on Feb. 6 in NYC, but by the time she returned it, the dress was half its original length.

“She said that the dress had ripped [at a club after the fundraiser] — she couldn’t possibly wear it like that — so her stylist friend went to the club bouncer and requested some scissors to repair the torn part of the dress,” a source tells Us Weekly. “But what bouncer has scissors?”

“She turned it into a mullet! Only a fashiony person would do that! ” the source continues. “She’s out of control and behaving really badly.”

The dress in question is actually the same one that fellow troubled star Charlie Sheen finagled for the 26-year-old actress. As revealed by Us Weekly, Sheen generously hooked up his Scary Movie 5 costar with the dress after personally putting in a call to celebrity stylist Phillip Bloch to outfit her for the glamorous AmFAR affair.

He even said he’d “go halfsies” with the actress to pay for the gown, an offer she did not accept: Lohan ended up borrowing the dress.

Last year, the actor offered to lend Lohan $100,000 to help cover her tax debt. The actress was said to have refused the money.

[From Us Weekly]

I don’t understand that one quote – “She turned it into a mullet! Only a fashiony person would do that.” WTF? No, a “fashiony person” would not chop off half of an expensive beaded gown just because there was a rip. You know who does that? A crackhead who doesn’t give a crap about anyone or anything. Sounds like Charlie is going to have to buy that dress after all. Either that or the stylist is going to end up suing Lindsay (and then she’ll countersue, and then she’ll hit him in a car, and then she’ll give someone a beej, and then she’ll go to court, then we’ll forget what we were talking about, rinse and repeat).

Photos courtesy of Us Weekly, WENN, Fame/Flynet.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

124 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan borrowed an expensive gown & returned it in cracked-out tatters”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. SmokeyBlues says:

    I bet it didn’t even rip. I bet she got high as a kite and started thinking that she would look hot with a short dress on. She’s doesn’t give a **** about anyone so she just cut the dress up on a whim. This should be embarassing but you know she doesn’t feel embarrassment!

  2. Hoya_chick says:

    Lol, she is such a hot mess. Maybe she thought they wouldn’t notice when she returned it that was cut in half! Also, who wears a ball gown to a club in the first place? Why didn’t she just change before she went? Gross.

    • kixendawn says:

      Hahahaha! OMG for sure she was like “meh …. they’ll NEVER notice” lol
      But seriously everyday a new story that shows how deluded this woman has become. She probably thinks the designer will praise her for such a ‘fashiony’ redo of his beautiful dress.
      BTW everyone lets not forget, Lindsay IS a runway fashion designer!

    • lower-case deb says:

      lucky the design house received the dress back. at. all. some stuff she borrowed was still AWOL.

      or, maybe she returned it because she’s fashiony! she’s trying to subtly say:
      “hey the dress you loaned me, srsly, it sux teh bols. so, i fixed it for U! bcoz i’m fashiony dat way.”

      she’s trying to subtly get them to recognize her for her talent in fashiony things. get her hired! things look millllleeees better when coked up obviously.

  3. brin says:

    What do you expect from a crackhead.

  4. allons-y alonso says:

    So let me get this straight. She borrows the dress and butchers it with a pair of scissors….What a complete lack of respect to someone’s work. Then again, the Cracken wouldn’t know what ‘respect’ or ‘work’ means.

  5. Bacon! says:

    Cue Lindsay saying the stylist cut it after she gave it back(in PRISTINE CONDITION BECAUSE SHE IS A PROFESSIONAL) to set her up and capitalize on her fame in 3…2……..

  6. DanaG says:

    And hopefully that will be the last idiot to let Lindsay borrow a dress. It was a nice too. What did she do with Charlies money if she just borrowed it and didn’t buy it? Will people never learn, guess not.

    • karmasabiatch! says:

      This is SO appalling to me, that anyone could return a favor like this.

      What Crackie needs is daily therapy in a lockdown facility and reprogramming to tear her psyche down and build it back up again. You know, into something that resembles a normal human being who feels normal emotions like shame, consideration and accountability for her actions? This post makes me ill.

      • TG says:

        Wonder if she would survive if they dropped her at a remote location with some supplies but she had to survive on her own for 6 months with zero contact with human beings. A survivor type of thing. She would have plenty of alone time and learn to be self reliant. Though, frankly I think she is too far gone for any help.

  7. Micki says:

    I’m amazed designers still loan her clothes.

  8. BobbieFisher says:

    Why doesn’t Charlie donate his money to someone who actually deserves it, like a family who lost their business in Hurricane Sandy, or a straight-A student who can’t afford tuition? And how stupid is he with his money? Lohan is not a non-profit organization – it’s apparent Sheen can’t deduct his contributions to her omnivore appetite for drugs, booze and living in expensive dumps of hotels. As for Lohan, she was probably passed out when the fashiony person did this – or at least in her usual crack stupor. Because no one, but no one gives scissors to a crackie, it had to be someone else.

    • Samigirl says:

      Actually, (and I can believe I’m defending Sheen), Charlie has a long history of donating money to random causes. He paid for a little girls cancer treatments, he paid for the funeral of that paparazzi who died trying to get pics of Justin Beiber. The only difference is he doesn’t brag about it or make it public, usually someone (maybe his publicist but who knows) leaks the story to TMZ. Charlie rarely talks about it though.

      • ahoyhoy says:

        Samigirl is correct! It’s kind of a C. Sheen quirk—He’s such an ASS, but so kind about giving money when people are in trouble.
        He can’t do anything ORGANIZED or budgeted with his charitable impulses, because he’s a crackhead! They’re scatter-brained.

      • vvvoid says:

        It’s frustrating for me that Charlie gets away with being a violent abuser of women, but I think he gets more of a pass than Chris Brown for reasons other than being white.
        1) He has a publicly documented drug problem, so people somewhat rightly attribute his outbursts to being high out of his skull. And don’t try to tell me that Chris’s pot smoking should give him the same pass. Pot=/= crack. Take it from someone who has smoked lots and lots of crack. Moi. That sh!t makes you insane on the come down. Ugh. I had to really train my brain to let go of “euphoric recall”, which is when your brain only remembers the high [which, with crack, lasts like 3 minutes max] even if the high was a tiny % of the overall experience [I'd be high for 3 minutes, manically depressed and psychotic for 2 hours].

        2) Charlie actually does a lot of nice, stand-up things. Chris does none of that. He prances around like a prick all day erryday, no redeeming qualities, pure ego and entitlement.

        3) Charlie shows some humility about his massive fvck ups. Chris just gets mad at us for noticing what a jerkoff he is.

        I do wish Charlie would stop enabling this histrionic narcissist crack head, but I think he has a soft-spot for the maligned because he’s been there. He also has terrible judgment when it comes to women. Denise Richards was a high point and he couldn’t take it, had to sabotage it. Not that he’s dating Lindsay, in fact I wouldn’t be FLOORED if it was revealed he’s never touched her, but they have some kind of weird involvement and she takes advantage of it. As the repulsively misogynistic Henry Miller would say, she has the heart of a whore…”not really a good heart but a lazy one, an indifferent, flaccid heart that can be touched for a moment, a heart without reference to any fixed point within, a big flaccid whore’s heart that can detach itself for a moment from it’s true center.”

      • erika says:

        Dear vvvoid,

        You rocked it! and that Henry Miller quote…that’s Crackie inspired!!! btw, kudos on your personal progress. that takes a lot of strength and perseverance : )

      • Katie says:

        Yeah, I think that he has some humanity to him. He’s an addict and gross and probably an asshole a good portion of the time, but I think there’s a part of him that’s a good guy. It probably has something to do with the fact that his parents are not Dina and Michael Lohan. I think that when a kid is taught the basics of being a decent human being and has good examples, he or she has an easier time of growing up with those qualities. LL clearly did not have that, and it shows.

      • vvvoid says:

        @Erika

        Thanks. It really is tough, because the brain loves that dopamine rush from crack more than any human being has ever loved anything, so you have to go to war with your brain. It’s like trying to convince a d!ckmatized woman that the orgasms are only 1% of the experience she has dating a narcissistic womanizing playboy.
        On a related note, my experience with crack [although for the majority of my time using drugs, I was a loyal opiophile, until suddenly I discovered what it was like to pair that downer with an upper...either powder coke in my arm or hits of crack] allows me to spot crackheads very well. Lindsay is a crackhead. I believe back when she was more slowly deteriorating, say, back when she was with Sam Ronson, I think she was abusing different drugs, probably painkillers and xanax. The extreme erratic and crazy behavior we are seeing now, coupled with how terminally broke she is, it all reeks of crack addiction. It mimics mania.

      • deehunny says:

        @vvoid

        I’d like to echo Erika’s sentiments and say thank you for being so open and honest about your past and sharing it with us. Most definitely inspiring.

  9. Lucy2 says:

    Anyone who loans her anything should never expect to get it back in one piece, or at all. As soon as she got her grubby hands on it, it became worthless anyway. Who would want it after she wore it?

  10. yuck says:

    Just when you think her behavior cannot possibly become more appalling, it does. When is her next court date?

  11. Samigirl says:

    When will people stop trusting her with their things? She had ZERO respect for anything, including herself.

  12. Celia says:

    Poor Lindsay. The shape of both her nostrils in the close up of her in the second pic gives away her nasty cocaine habit. Looks like her nose cartilage is being eaten away. If she keeps going the way she is, she’ll be lucky if her septum doesn’t cave in.

  13. Blue Jean says:

    I wish someone would put her out of the world’s misery…

    • Masque says:

      No, no, no! Then she’d be saintified and end up a Hollywood martyr. “Tragic” and “gone too soon” and “devastating loss” would be the lies used to described her. And that would be so disrespectful to the decent and talented entertains whose lives WERE cut tragically short.

  14. lady mary. says:

    is that really the pic of WHAT’s left of that dress?good god ,why is that she betrays the trust when someone trusts her ,all her actions seemm very purposeful and not something that was done in cokke influence or anythin ,ungrateful twat

  15. marie says:

    why anyone would loan anything to that crackhead is beyond me. I mean, they can’t be shocked that this happened right?

  16. Lulu says:

    It ripped because she no doubt feel down in it. Anyone who loans her anything these days is just waiting for something like this to happen so they can have their whining 15 minutes of fame IMO. What sane person could expect it to turn out well??

  17. GoodCapon says:

    I’m not condoning what she did but IMO the dress actually looks better as a mullet.

    So who’s going to pay for it now??

  18. Lamar says:

    I used to feel bad for her but its clear she just don’t give a shit. She 100% cut this dress on purpose so she wasn’t wearing a gown at a club and probably in her dizzy brain thought she was doing the designer a favor by even wearing it. If you watched her mom on Dr Phil it’s easy to see why she is so messed up and I hope Charlie is ready to give up on her, it was bad enough when she didn’t say thank you to him for the 100,000. Until he put her on blast fot it. What’s really funny is a couple weeks ago now that her mom is losing her house she put out a tweet to Charlie saying thanks for having Linds back, does she want his money now too?

  19. Mich says:

    OMG! I laughed so hard at the headline and the pic of that poor dress. This girl is just too unbelievable for words.

  20. Cecada says:

    Move that long dress, I’m Lindsay Lohan!!

  21. JL says:

    Her assistant was driving, I mean wearing the dress….

  22. kitkerenina says:

    Lindz’s stylist friend???

    Real stylists don’t ruin expensive gowns by higher ups in the business. Or let their friends wear them to clubs. That person is toast.

  23. Macey says:

    I really think she gets off on destroying people’s things/property.
    You could run another spreadsheet of all the things she’s intentionally damaged.

    the mink coat she peed on b/c she was caught stealing, Liz’s trailer, the plumbing on the Liz set. The Liz trailer was not the first time she damaged a property thru the plumbing. She reportedly did the same thing to Harry Morton’s shower back when they were seeing each other. Caused him over 150K in damage. TMZ has the article on that one, think it was in 2007.
    These are just a cpl off the top of my head and before my coffee, Im sure there’s tons more.

  24. NerdMomma says:

    1750 is chump change. That was a cheap dress and it looked cheap, and now this designer is getting loads of free publicity. But I do agree with an above poster that it’s cuter as a mullet dress. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I bet she looked better after she cut it. It swallows her up as a floor length gown and all you see is her facial bloat.

    The surprising part is that she returned the dress at all.

    • Hillbillyinthecorner says:

      reguardless how much it cost…..it wasn’t hers to cut…..So if it doesn’t both you then you shouldn’t mind if she borrowed one of your best dresses and spills vodka all over it smotherss it in cigarrete smoke and ashes and then takes and cut it in half and leaves it in tatters because she thought it would look better……. Don’t think so….

      • NerdMomma says:

        I should clarify! I didn’t mean 1750 is chump change to ME! That’s more than I make in a month. I’m saying for the designer, that’s more than worth the publicity because now we’ve heard their name.

        I’m a public school teacher and I don’t even own a dress, or any brand-name anything. I am merely commenting on how Hollywood works.

        Also, I am not defending her actions AT ALL. I’m saying this was more than likely a calculated move on the part of the designer, who loaned a dress they didn’t mind never seeing again. No one would loan anything of real value to Lohan, because they know they wouldn’t get it back.

  25. Liz says:

    The Daily News is reporting she wasn’t even on the guest list.

    • LAK says:

      Not to defend Lilo, but she doesn’t have to be on the list. The tables are cheaper than individual tickets. An individual or company buys a table and fills it with their friends. The table is listed under the name of purchaser.

      That’s how Lilo gets to Amfar every year. She’s not comped a ticket by the event as she would have been in her hey day.

  26. NeNe says:

    I think everyone has to stop enabling this self absorbed nutjob, and let her start doing for herself. No wonder she feels entitled. It’s because of all of these morons who keep bailing her out of the messes she makes. She is never going to learn, or face any consequences if everyone always rushes to her aid. Hello enablers, WAKE THE F*CK UP!!!!

  27. JL says:

    ummmmm.
    hmmmmmm.

    No words come to mind, this is expected, normal and bland.

    So much for an attention gettting move.

  28. Dee Cee says:

    It was a fuggy-ugly dress anyway.. shrewd fashion lender knew she’d leave personal cracky mark on it and isn’t that bothered..

  29. Hillbillyinthecorner says:

    What I find incrediable about this whole sordid tale is there are some people who are actually still trying to make excuses for her for doing this……It was a cheap dress…What has the price of the dress have to do with anything…..IT WASN”T HERS TO DO ANYTHING WITH……it was borrowed and ilreguardless of how much pubicity the designer is getting now whether he be a unknown or famous has not one iota to do with her destroying someone elses property……A real human being with real feelings and respect for others would not do that to something borrowed….they would give it back in the same condition or even better then they got it….Instead she destroys it…and reguarless whether it looked better shorter or longer it wasn’t up to her to cut it….
    NO MORE even referred excuses ! this was completely wrong and the fault falls squarely on Lindsay Dee Lohan …

    • Sugar says:

      makes you wonder what the heck is wrong with those defending her behavior-it’s sad that there are a few who actually think this ain’t no big deal- the dress needed altering anyway
      Wow just wow.

    • swack says:

      A real human being with real feelings and respect for others would not do that to something borrowed….they would give it back in the same condition or even better then they got it – I like this comment. You would think anyone who wears something for free would have it cleaned before returning. This reminds me of the camping/hiking ideal – always leave the campsite/trail better than when you were there (in other words clean it up even if it isn’t your trash). It’s a good idea to follow no matter what the situation is.

    • Masque says:

      No one is defending her behavior. Some people have made wry jokes that the designer probably gave her that (bottom of their inventory) dress knowing it would get ruined and they would get publicity. However, I’m pretty sure the commenters were just joking.

    • Annie says:

      Hillbilly – IKR! I read people saying stuff like they’d have chopped it down too because the dress is obviously too long to dance in! What is wrong with these people!

  30. Elceibeno08 says:

    I cannot believe anybody would loan her anything!
    The one who must’ve been high was the designer who gave her the dress. Lindsey is making a lot of people mad.

  31. TQB says:

    She looked HORRIBLE in the gown to begin with? Seriously, she looks great for having a baby a month ago. What’s that? Just booze bloat? Oy.

    • Annie says:

      I’d say in her case it’s a swollen liver and clogged up bowels and poor kidney function. If her face looks this bad can you imagine the mess her poor internal organs are in? The dress looks 100% hideous on her and like she skinned a muppet to get it. That said, i’d probably love it on Someone Else.

  32. Liz says:

    I can hardly even laugh at her any longer. She has sunk so low and has become so pathetic. Its sad to remember she once had talent and a limitless future in Hollywood. She has become a parody of herself. Her peers are making seven and eight figures for Oscar-worthy performances. She is desperate to peddle energy drinks.

  33. G says:

    Maybe that dress just committed suicide.

  34. echolocate says:

    Cutting aside, I have to laugh at the state of the sparkly stuff on the dress after she returned it.

    It looks like when we would have a partial box of tinsel left over, so we’d toss it into the box with the ornaments after Christmas. Inevitably, it was a bent-up, wrinkled, tangled mess by the following year, and there was no way we could reuse it.

    The designer would have been better off loaning the dress to Maru the cat.

  35. erika says:

    I’m going to die before Crackroach because this slag gives me a HEART ATTACK!!

    Sweet Jaysus! WHO, let the Crackroach out? Who! who who who!

    1- how can any living being allow Crackroach to ‘borrow’ a dress? ‘rent’ a dress? and this bitch (!!!) thinks she deserves everything for free! wtf?

    2-I wish Charlie Sheen would go on a hooker n’ coke holiday far, far away, no cell coverage. He has a crapload of cash and doesn’t give a damn seeing it wash down the toilet.

    3-WHO? is inviting her to events? how the Hell does she get into these things?

    WHY? why does she literally s***t on everything? nothing has value to her (coke, vodka). No human, car, pedestrian, movie role, house, no HEALTH (!!!)…I just can’t get it through my head!?

    And WHO doesn’t make a 160′ turn and run away when they see this Crackslag? She still gets every God D@*&! thing she wants like she’s still on the set of ParentTrap and the world loves her.

    WHY? in the light of 300K TAX drama, multiple court cases, homeless, jobless, health-less and universally HATED ON does she manage to walk out the f*****ng door? WHEN IS SHE GOING TO GET HER DUES? PUNISHED? CRACK ROCK BOTTOM!!!???

    A CB commenter mentioned last week that they spotted Crackslag on the street? Next time? Kick her in the ass for me PLEASE! and yes, I’ll pay for the court fees for you when she decides to sue…

  36. G says:

    BTW, I don’t think those shoes deserve to live, either.

  37. That Girl says:

    This girl is a textbook sociopath and I don’t say that lightly. She has no concept of remorse or embarrassment. I also think that in her mind, she’s like A+ list.

  38. JuneBug says:

    I really can’t stand Lohan but, that’s not the same dress. Take a closer look. It’s pretty obvious .

  39. tabasco says:

    She didn’t refuse the 100k (AS IF). She just took her sweet time thanking him for it. As for her being lent and subsequently destroying something…..in other news, the sky is blue…

    and you know, i’ve got some student loans that i could use some help with. can captain save-a-ho get a fing clue about what he does with his money?

  40. EscapedConvent says:

    My head is spinning because I cannot believe anyone would loan her anything! A dress, an earring, a stapler! Anything at all! She’s completely destructive. I’ve known a few sociopaths & they are amateurs compared to her.

    Not to be *too* cynical, but how is it possible that anyone would loan her a dress & expect it to be returned in good condition? Or returned at all? Maybe someone does want some publicity—maybe that’s worth more to them than the dress. Just a thought.

  41. Madriani's Girl says:

    Look at her nails and cuticles. I’d never be caught dead with my hands looking like that!

  42. Grace says:

    What kind of beej’s is that girl giving that she has so many men willing to shell out thousands of dollars for Cracken sex?

  43. d says:

    Holy guacamole vvvoid at 10:01 a.m.!Tthat is BANG ON. And that Miller quote…I do believe that sums up both Lindsey and her mom to a T.

    • vvvoid says:

      Lol, funny you said “bang on” considering how much coke I banged with the needle ;x

      But thanks. Takes a [in my case former] crackhead to know a crackhead.

      Henry Miller pisses me off to no end, but what pisses me off more is how interesting and compelling his woman-hating writing is. Nothing I hate more than a man who loves going to prostitutes and then condemns everything about them in the same breath. I wouldn’t be surprised if he were the Green River Killer of his day.

  44. Mia says:

    Wow, she is so uncouth and disgusting. And she obviously has no home training. How can a person shamelessly return ANYTHING they have borrowed in worse condition then they received it? Without even offering to repair it, replace it, or in her crackhead, no-class having case just buying it? Especially when her reputation for respecting other people’s possessions is already in the toilet? If she had sense and truly cared about rehabilitating her reputation and public persona she would have tried to find a way to purchase the dress with no one, not the stylist or the media, ever finding out what she did to it. She might not have worn it again, but guess what? She probably wouldn’t have given stylists and others in the entertainment and fashion industries yet ANOTHER reason to blackball her. I’m sure God cant even convince Philip Bloch to let her borrow anything again, let alone Charlie Sheen.

  45. skuddles says:

    She’s just so trashy and gross. Why on earth would ANYONE loan her ANYTHING??? Of course she destroyed the dress… she was just being true to her putrid piggy personality. No offense to actual pigs.

    But hey… at least she didn’t steal it ;)

  46. Cool Phosphorescent Shimmer says:

    How short must that dress have been after she cut it? Do we call that Barely Crotch Grazing? Full-On Hoo-Ha? Is there a seamstress-y name for that “look”?

    And more importantly, did she get any new customers after the dress helped her advertise her wares?

  47. apsutter says:

    Can’t wait for the pics of her with the newly shortened gown. There have to be some out there somewhere!

  48. PortlandJan says:

    She could have a whole new blackmail racket going.
    Lindsay to Hermes, Laboutin, Cartier, etc: “Pay me $250,000. or I’ll wear your purse/shoes/jewelry/whatever in public!”.

  49. Bread and Circuses says:

    I think she looked so pretty that night, with that dress, and with her hair and makeup looking good.

    And she destroyed the dress. On purpose.

    She’s an a-hole. That’s all there is to it.

  50. truthful says:

    I’ve been so busy today but when I saw this last night, I laughed at what the response would be on here.

    I am cracking up at this and at the same time, its a damn shame!!

    this thread is hilarious though.

    Linds is McTrash, LOL
    and Charlie, though filthy rich, should mind his own CRACK business and stop trying to save her crack ass.

  51. soxfan says:

    She is ugly both inside and out. She looks like Janice The Muppet here. No offense to Janice The Muppet.

  52. citygirlsf says:

    She always looks stinky.

  53. OhMyMy says:

    She’s done this before. Google images Lindsay Lohan Cannes. The last time she was there (the trip with the infamous I can’t go to court because my passport was stolen) she wore a white dress with silver crap on the shoulders on the red carpet. It’s obvious in the picture she hacked up the hem of it with a pair of nail scissors.

    This incident if the dress is borrowed you don’t intentionally ruin it just because you feel like it.

    She’s an uncouth, uncivilized, ungrateful waste of space.

    Oh…and TMZ is reporting she lost her lawsuit against Pitbull.

  54. the original bellaluna says:

    Looks like the tinsel vommed off the tree and landed on the (poorly made) tree skirt.

    Honestly, what does one expect when dealing with The Cracken? (Correct answer: Nothing short of this.)

  55. Valerie says:

    Oh, who cares! Why do people even bother taking pictures of this train wreck?

  56. ViloDeMenus says:

    She still fancies herself as a “designer”, how sad. She thinks she “fixed” what was a beautiful dress into a rag. SURPRISE! On the other hand after all the destruction she’s left in her wake that’s been widely reported on and verified – only an idiot would lend her anything of value, or anything beautiful.