James Franco speaks out on the banning of gay sex at Aussie film festivals

James Franco

James Franco might very well be one of the most annoyingly pretentious actors on the planet with his manner of speaking in Petrarchian sonnets and tendency to declare his own butt to be “art,” but he did a decent thing that I’ll get to in just a bit. For the moment, however, I wanted to touch upon a recent Franco interview in which he admitted that the rumors concerning his sexuality are mostly his fault because he admits that he’s cultivated the resulting intrigue as “part of my public image.” Further, James has stirred the pot not only by playing gay characters in Howl and Milk but also by stating “Maybe I’m just gay” when asked.

For the record, I don’t think that James Franco is either gay or bisexual. Instead, I think he consistently manipulates his own image in his usual artsy-fartsy way, and he truly thinks that appearing sexually ambiguous will make him look like more of an artist. I think that Franco is totally straight and just messing with everyone, and if I were a gay man, I’d probably be at least a little bit offended.

Enough of my theories though, for James has gone and done something decent. If you’ll remember, Franco recently co-directed a movie called Interior. Leather Bar with Travis Mathews. The movie was a reimagining of gay S&M footage that was inspired by a so-called missing reel from 1980’s Cruising, and it didn’t make any waves at Sundance this year, but now Mathews has gone on to promote another movie featuring gay sex at several Aussie gay film festivals. Unfortunately, Australia has banned the film from even screening at these gay-leaning festivals due to sexual content, and Franco thinks this is utter crap. For once, the dude actually has a point:

James Franco

James Franco is speaking out against Australia’s ban on I Want Your Love, the new gay-themed film directed by Travis Mathews.

In a new video originally posted by Out Magazine, Franco, who collaborated with Mathews on Interior. Leather Bar., calls the Australian Classification Board’s decision to yank the film from planned screenings at gay film festivals in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane “really silly” and “very short-sighted.”

Noting that “sex in films hasn’t had a chance to grow and become a sophisticated storytelling device,” Franco adds, “Frankly, adults should be able to choose … I don’t know why in this day and age, something like this…is being banned. It’s just embarrassing.”

According to its official website, I Want Your Love tells the story of a young gay man in San Francisco who prepares to return to his Midwestern roots. “Torn between his creative dreams and the reality of earning a living, he’s forced to take responsibility by redefining what it means to be an artist, a gay man, and an adult,” a synopsis reads.

Mathews served as co-director and screenwriter of Interior. Leather Bar., which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January.

“Every f–king love story is a dude that wants to be with a girl, and the only way they’re going to end up happy is if they walk off into the sunset together,” Franco told Entertainment Weekly before the premiere of his film. “I’m f–king sick of that s–t. So if there’s a way for me to just break that up in my own mind, I’m all for it.”

[From HuffPo]

Here’s a video clip of Franco’s statement on Australia’s ban of Travis Mathews’ film. Franco is clearly sticking up for his friend and co-director here, but he also speaks some common sense. How strange for James Franco to open his mouth without trying to make himself sound like the smartest man in the universe!

James Franco

James Franco

Photos courtesy of WENN

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “James Franco speaks out on the banning of gay sex at Aussie film festivals”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. T.Fanty says:

    And, ironically, when he’s trying not to shove it down our throats is when he actually does sound smart. *This* guy is someone I like.

  2. allons -y alonso says:

    It pains me to say it, but Franco is right….okay now that i haven’t spontaneously combusted i can continue.

    I’m Aussie and i think it’s ridiculous that the film is banned. I don’t why it has been banned in first place. The broadcasting and film codes of practice don’t bat an eyelash when it comes to films that depict extreme violence, so why should sex, as something that explores human relationships (like Franco says), be judged so harshly.

    • j.eyre says:

      Asking out of curiosity (and have not read all the comments) is all sexual content banned?

      • allons -y alonso says:

        Not at all. Sex is quite common place n television and film. It’s rated -(and, if on telly) – aired on a later time. I would say banning this specific film has more to do with the quite large homophobic streak in many Australians. Not all Aussies of course, but many.

  3. lucy2 says:

    Franco’s a pretentious turd 99% of the time. This is the 1% I can get on board with.

  4. Ms Kay says:

    As much as I get what Franco is saying, I believe that sexual material is banned a lot… Now I wonder is it because the film is about a gay story or is it because of the sexual material? I mean ever seen the movie Shortbus? And Brown Bunny? And more recently Keira Knigthley ad banned from kids TV programmes because it was “sexually suggestive”, and I scratched my head over that one because 1. why is a perfume ad on a kids TV programme in the 1st place? 2. can a child understand the “sexual message”?

    That said, I need to get myself a Hawaiian t-shirt.

    • lee says:

      I agree that sex in general is too often treated as a greater evil than extreme violence in film, but the reality is that gay sex is treated even more harshly. anyone interested in the subject should definitely watch ‘this film is not yet rated’. it’s a GREAT documentary that discusses the MPAA ratings board and how/why they censor what they do.

      I mean, even shortbus is primarily gay sex. and brown bunny was mostly controversial because it was openly admitted that the sex was real. If anyone has seen ‘But, I’m a cheerleader’ (which is awesome, by the way), it was originally given an NC-17 rating by the MPAA when the only true sexual content is implied masturbation (over a nightgown at that). Meanwhile, American Pie was released that same year and got an R.

  5. marie says:

    wow, never thought I would agree with Franco. people should have a choice in what they want to see, don’t ban it just because it makes you uncomfortable.

  6. T.C. says:

    Can’t stand this pretentious douche most of the time but he’s doing good here.

  7. mimi says:

    I agree with the beginning of your post completely and would like to add one point:

    His ticket to Yale’s PhD program was the queer theories/ criticism and he was making any effort to appeal to some of the professors that that is their career and field (and they are gay), especially one of them.

    HE did the same in NYU because that was his ticket to the academic world, having quite a poor academic achievements compared with other candidate.

    So, again, he played this game and it worked so he is continuing to play the same card as it serves him right.

    As for the banning of gay sexual acts: if indeed this is aimed only towards same sex acts than that is wrong and it was indeed the right thing to do to speak up against it, However, if this policy is against sexual acts or vulgar provocations that are mean to score point by grabbing attention by those provocations (vs. actually creating good cinematic work) than, no, they have a right to draw the line and make the point of what film and cinema is about.

  8. dcypher1 says:

    hes not gay at all he use to go out with marla sokoloff back in the day. i think this pretending to be gay to increase his artistic credibility is crap. u can support the gay community without pretending to be gay. he pisses me off.

    • themummy says:

      He never once actually claimed to be gay. Look again.

      Wow…seriously? Reading comprehension, my friend.

      • dcypher1 says:

        I never said he said he was gay. All I was saying u shouldnt act and confuse people to think ur gay if ur not its just like lying. If he was really gay it wouldnt matter but hes not so it feels like a fake image persona thing.hes not genuinely gay.

  9. elceibeno08 says:

    Thank you James for calling out the hypocrisy and homophobia of some people.

  10. vvvoid says:

    I think one positive of his contrived sexually ambiguous image is that it shows a straight actor not giving a crap if people think he’s gay. I guess Daniel Tosh does that too but more for humor.

    • NerdMomma says:

      Yes! I wanted to say the same. More actors should just say, “Who cares?” when questioned about their sexuality. It’s insulting when they act like they have to defend their heterosexuality, as if it’s something precious. We are all just fine just the way we are.

      • Sweet Dee says:

        +1 to you both, and +1 to Franco. I’m normally not a fan of his, but I think what he said needed saying, and others of influence should join him.

        As for Hollywood, I think more actors should act like it’s not a big deal, whether they’re straight or not. I heard it was because it’s hard for people to imagine a gay man as a straight one in a role, but I disagree. NPH, Matt Bomer. Enough said.

    • vvvoid says:

      I honestly don’t even dislike James Franco, I’m not a huge fan but I kinda like him. He reminds me of an obnoxious but lovable guy I grew up with and then eventually dated…oddly, this guy looked and acted exactly like Daniel Tosh.
      I think it’s a bit pearl-clutchy to get all up in arms over his “winkmaybeI’mgaywink” act as though it’s offensive to gay men…I think what’s more offensive to gay men, as you guys have said, is when actors go out of their way to clarify that they are straight, as if gayness is some malady they have been wrongly accused of suffering from.

  11. lori says:

    I tried to watch him last nite on the Colbert Report. He’s difficult to hear with his head so far up his own ass.

  12. SCREEEE says:

    Good on him for taking time out of his busy schedule of self-absorption to actually say something useful and thought out. +1, Franco.

  13. Guest5400 says:

    Sorry girls but Franco is totally bi curious.I wish he would just say he is bi because I really believe most people with half a brain can tell and it wouldn’t hurt his career at all.Anybody that does as many gay movies is him is just looking for an excuse to kiss hot men.Ain’t nobody that liberal.James you too cute to be fronting we need you at the parades boo

  14. Shoe_Lover says:

    As an Australian, and a liberal minded person, I’m so bummed about the film festivals decision. I didn’t even realise some people were homophobes until my teenage years. My Uncle is gay, my Aunt is gay and has been with her girlfriend for about 30 years (and it sucks they can’t get legally married) and my cousin is gay (he didn’t come out until a few years ago but we all knew and when he told us we were like “tell us something we don’t know”) so I never even thought about it- I just assumed it was an accepted part of life. You know, some people are straight, some people are gay like some people are brunette and some are blonde, some people are white and some people are black.
    But when I was 15 I had three guy friends who are gay and it was then I realised there was a stigma because they were bullied for simply being who they are. Sad really.

    I would much rather see s*x on screen then extreme violence. It’s a pretty stupid decision when you can just look at the Underbelly series, which usually airs at 8.30pm, and see graphic s*x scenes and a lot of violence. But I guess that’s deemed “fine” because it’s straight couples being depicted. Oh wait I forgot about the group s*x in the original Underbelly series- how is that okay on prime time TV but a gay s*x scene at a film festival is not allowed. Oh and all the stripper and prostitute scenes in the third series

    That said- not all Australians are bigots- the bigots just seem to be the ones who make the most noise. I’d say the majority couldn’t give a sh!t.

    • TalkyTina says:

      Here is a novel idea!

      Don’t like a movies content… do NOT go see it!

      Maybe I’m not that smart or its my AS.
      But I don’t see why people think they have the right to ban things and not allow others to live their lives just because they don’t agree with it!
      I don’t care if you are gay,straight, trans, bi…whatever!
      When it comes down to it we are all human and just trying to make through the short life we have on this crazy planet.

  15. Lucrezia says:

    The Aussie laws are a little weird.

    R-rating = simulated sex = legal to own/sell.

    X-rating = real sex = legal to own. However, in most states it’s illegal to sell it. (Yes, this is daft. And yes, porn shops in those states sell it anyway. It puts them at risk of police raids and fines/confiscation, but the police generally find better things to do. Much like the police usually turn a blind-eye to prostitution.)

    This particular film has some real-sex in amongst the simulated-sex. (That’s the bit everyone is missing when they’re comparing it to Underbelly and the like!) So this would have an X rating, and they can’t sell tickets to it. But it’s not illegal to own/watch it.

    The media are spinning it as homophobic, but it’s not. That Nymphomaniac film (with Shia LaBeouf and the real sex scenes) is going to have the exactly the same problem.

  16. muppet_barbershop says:

    Oddly, any positive reference to the film Cruising, which directly caused a really nasty spate of gay men being bashed in NYC, could be construed as offensive. I find myself wondering whether the ban on the first film at the festival was a “well, even my gay friend hates it, so let’s just ban it cuz men’s butts scare me” thing. 🙂 Anyway, it’s nice that the kid has done something useful.