Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux hold hands, look couple-y in NYC: adorable?

Here are some photos of Justin Theroux and Jennifer Aniston walking around NYC yesterday. According to Pacific Coast News, they went shopping at Barney’s (no bags?) and then went to dinner at Fred’s, then they walked “back” on Madison Avenue. I wonder where they’re staying? Allegedly, Justin kept the New York apartment he had with Heidi Bivens (he made Heidi leave the place after nine years together), but it seems that whenever Jennifer is in town, they stay in hotels and not his place.

As for Jennifer’s baggy, figure-covering clothes… do we still have to play the “is she pregnant?” game? She’s not pregnant. The only real question I have is “Why does she insist on wearing oversized layers when she works so hard on her yoga body?” I’ll admit it – if I had a rock-hard yoga body, I would wander around in jeggings and a tank top. Her whole look is very layered, very Johnny Depp, I’m just sayin’. As for Justin’s style… never trust a man in skinny jeans. NEVER.

Page Six had this weird little item about Justin today – it’s so random:

Justin Theroux unintentionally crashed a birthday party Friday night. The actor was spotted at a corner table during a private birthday party at the rooftop of the Jane Hotel. Spies said he was with two male friends who had brought two girls, but his fiancée, Jennifer Aniston, was not in sight.

“He seemed to be reserved and low-key,” says a spy. We’re told someone had booked the space for their birthday, but staff let Theroux and his group in anyway.

[From Page Six]

Is there a side-eye in there that I’m missing? Is it supposed to be interesting that Justin was out with some friends and Jennifer wasn’t there? I mean, if you told me that there was some undercover drama in JustJen’s relationship, I would believe you, but I don’t take this story as evidence of the drama.

PS… Is it just me or does Jennifer’s diamond ALWAYS look cloudy? I’m starting to wonder if it’s quartz.

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

163 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston & Justin Theroux hold hands, look couple-y in NYC: adorable?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. gogoGorilla says:

    She looks seriously terrible in these pics. That orange tan is doing her no favors. It makes her face look mottled and old.

    Also, I can see her wrinkling her nose at staying in any apartment where he used to live with someone else, so that part doesn’t surprise me at all. I imagine her to be one of those celebs that has a laundry list of ridiculous requirements like unicorn-hair pillows and shower water imported from Tibet.

    • David99 says:

      He kinda looks like he is walking with his mom.

    • springingforward says:

      Nailed it.

      She looks awful here. Maybe recovering from a new dermatologic procedure or something.
      And ugh! Men in skinny jeans and shoe polish hair are a big NO with me.

    • Eleonor says:

      YEP. The skin under her neck, over the boobs, screams old.
      Something nice: I really like her purse.

      • Willa says:

        I love that purse! She has it in brown and black.

      • moon says:

        Give her a break. She’s not a 20 year old so obviously she’s not going to have 20 year old skin. What’s with the ageism? She looks good for her age.

      • gogoGorilla says:

        @moon – it is really not ageism. It is about the consequences of sun worship and/or a spray tan addiction. She looks orange and terrible because she insists on being that color, not because of her age.

        (I’m the same age as her. I do not look like someone dunked me in orangeade.)

  2. Lurker says:

    Her jaws? No wonder some people call her Jawniffer.

    • Sabrine says:

      Isn’t that nice, making fun of someone’s facial feature. The tan – fine, clothes – fine, but to ridicule a facial feature someone is born with and has no control over, is low and mean.

      • emmie_a says:

        Oh please – she lies about all the plastic surgery/procedures/injections she has had so who even knows what features are original and what’s not.

      • Kim1 says:

        GMAB they make fun of Jolie’s veins,SJP’s hands,Rumer Willis’ chin…

  3. epiphany says:

    She reminds me of an old Rod Stewart song, ‘Maggie May’, about an older woman having an affair with a longer man -‘the morning sun when it’s in your face really shows your age.’

  4. annaloo. says:

    Girl I am seeing the Iggy Pop comparisons…it’s not the look.

    but, I do like how they sartorially match.

  5. Kim1 says:

    Is she morphing into Streisand?

  6. khaveman says:

    I have to say he looks great here. Amazing body! And I’m glad to see him wearing a jacket that is not black. She is dressing a little old for her age here. Not doing her any favors.

    • epiphany says:

      You do realize she’s 44 years old, right? Not ancient, certainly, but not a kid. She’s usually goes the opposite direction and dresses like she’s still 25.

      • gogoGorilla says:

        Agreed. I think the outfit is fine. The sweater is a bit on the momsy side, but maybe it was chilly that day.

        He – eh. I don’t find him attractive at all. He makes me think that’s what Ken would look like if they did a Ken: The Biker Edition Ken doll.

      • Becky1 says:

        Yeah, I’m not a fan of the sweater but to me she looks age appropriate. She’s 44 and I really think she looks fine for her age. I honestly don’t see a lot of fortysomething people in real, non-celebrity life that look much better. There seems to be an expectation that celebrities shouldn’t age and should look the same as they did 15-20 years ago. Even with all of the help they get, it’s just not feasible. I have yet to meet or see anyone in their 40’s (in real life or a celebrity) who looks like they are in their 20’s.

  7. Tessa says:

    She probably didn’t pack for the really COLD weather we’re having, so she had to really layer up. It’s freezing outside!

    • Micki says:

      I wonder why she’s wearing flip-flops then?

      • Rhea says:

        Not a fan of her but I can’t really blame her for wearing a flip flop. The weather’s crazy here. She might be the same as me, going out when the weather was warm but later during the day somehow the wind starting to get colder and regret not wearing something warmer. LOL.

        It’s much warmer now than during the winter, but still—-parts where the buildings blocking the sun…brrrrr!!!!!!

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Micki, who wrote: “I wonder why she’s wearing flip-flops then?”

        Perhaps she’s had ‘foot work’ (bunions removed) done too.

      • Micki says:

        My flip-flops pet hate obviously took charge. Still I’d wear strappy sandals or something else to accomodate my de-bunioned feet or the weather.
        Can you actually walk after a removed bunion? I thougth it requires weeks of feet up…?

      • Esmom says:

        Having bunions removed involves removing bones and pinning or screwing the remaining ones back together, so no you can’t walk for weeks afterwards and you have to wear a supportive foot boot/cast thing. I speak from experience. 🙂

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Esmom, who wrote: “Having bunions removed involves removing bones and pinning or screwing the remaining ones back together, so no you can’t walk for weeks afterwards and you have to wear a supportive foot boot/cast thing. I speak from experience.”

        From MedicineNet.com

        Who develops bunions?: “Bunions most commonly affect women. Some studies report that bunion symptoms occur nearly 10 times more frequently in women. It has been suggested that tight-fitting shoes, especially high-heel and narrow-toed shoes, might increase the risk for bunion formation.”

        How are Bunions treated?: “Nonsurgical treatments such as rest and wearing loose (wider) shoes or sandals can often relieve the irritating pain of bunions. Walking shoes may have some advantages, for example, over high-heeled styles that pressure the sides of the foot.”

        This is the second day Jen has been photographed wearing flip-flops on this New York City trip. The last time she was photographed wearing flip-flops in regular, non-beach wear clothing was two years ago in Hawaii.

        On a side note … when my mother had surgery to have her bunions removed she didn’t have to wear a cast, just gauze bandages and tape. I guess it depends upon how severe your bunion situation is.

    • NYC_girl says:

      It was warm out yesterday (mother’s day) but now it’s cold again!

      I don’t care about either of them – he is too thin IMO and her ring looks freaky, but I still want her bag.

  8. Arock says:

    Anyone recognize that bag? Marc Jacobs? Love it.

  9. hoya_chick says:

    She does have a shopping bag if you look closely in the last 2 pictures, especially the last one. See it? Her whole outfit looks like a crazy bag lady. Maybe lose the hat and that awful shawl sweater thing and the scarf tied to the purse? Memba when she used to dress all hipster when they first got together? Lol, what happened to that look? Oh and her ring is so ugly.

    • Janet says:

      Why does she always have some raggedy-ass scarf tied to her shoulder bag? Is she still in need of a security blanket?

  10. Sal says:

    Is it just me or do they both look very orange? Him in the face, and her on the feet.

  11. Mac says:

    That’s the same bodyguard that accompanied them to the Vatican last year.

    Do all the big stars require security whenever they decide to go out in public?

    • lisa2 says:

      If I was a big STAR I would There are insane people in the world. Look at how many celebs have been killed or attacked.

      They don’t have much chemistry together. I’m sure her fans are happy to see them holding hands.

  12. daisydoodle says:

    she looks like she just had a laser treatment on her face, hence the sunglasses and hat…

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      Agreed. Remember when Jen escaped to New York right after her mother was admitted to the hospital and she walked around for a week wearing hats pulled low, scarves around her neck, and large dark sunglasses? I thought she’d had face work done then as well. Her plastic surgeon must have moved to New York.

  13. Karen says:

    Flip flops in Manhattan? Her soles of her feet must be black. Yuck.

    • NicolaGossips says:

      I know. I live in Toronto and whenever I wear them, when I get home I walk straight into my bathroom and into the tub to wash my feet and flip flops.

      When you wear flip flops you understand why some cultures don’t allow shoes past the front door. Shocking how much dirt you gather and don’t notice.

      • Sassy says:

        Why not wear regular shoes instead of flip flops if it makes your feet so dirty?

    • Happymom says:

      Yes, gross. I would never wear flip flops in that city.

  14. Hipocricy says:

    How tall is she ? She looks super short next to him.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      Jen claims 5’4″, but I don’t believe she’s that tall.

      Picture her wearing those strapless dresses at ‘this’ her true height (without those 5″ heels), and you’ll understand why I say she’s stumpy.

      • Loira says:

        He is wearing heeled boots, but still He is taller than her and still, their legs are the same size heel to hip!
        He has a really weird body and a large head.

  15. Jenn says:

    Does anyone else think that she deliberately dresses in billowing clothes (every now and again) on purpose so we play the is she / isn’t she pregnant game?

    • NicolaGossips says:

      It’s the only play she has. She’s getting less and less press and her people know it. So when she’s shows up on a red carpet after not being seen for a while, it’s always in something baggy. Guaranteed coverage.

    • Eli says:

      No! JA has quit smoking and it is common knowledge that one puts on 10 – 15 lbs when they put them down. In these photos, she is wearing a t-shirt, khakis, a an over sweater. What in the world is so baggy? I don’t see it! Isn’t there such a thing as being comfortable or, are the haters just going to continue to pick her apart? I’m thinking it is the latter…

      • Kim1 says:

        Her last two outfits on RC including the black baby doll dress are unusual outfits for her.These pics just demonstrate she his looking her age with orange skin

      • Tasha says:

        If I remeber right she started smocking again and was photograph doing it and she lost the 10-15 pounds she did gain do to smocking again.

    • Sal says:

      This is the same woman who, when with Vince Vaughn, went out without a bra on and with her nipples iced and a diamond ring on her ring finger and grinning, walked in one day of the pap-laden haunt The Ivy at Peak lunch hour and straight out the back – in order to be papped. Nothing with Aniston isn’t planned, you can bet she wears those dresses on purpose. Just as she did with that diamond ring while with Vaughn (he subsequently dumped her right after that stunt of hers).

      Eli, Aniston supposedly quit smoking a couple of years ago, so her weight NOW, has nothing to do with it as that was 2 years ago. And I will remember your ‘hater’ comment when you write negative things on a Jolie story. You and your ilk are the VERY REASON Aniston gets ‘so much hate’ as Esmom says.

      • Ms.Smurf says:

        She should’ve kept that diamond ring that she tried to trap Vaughn with…because the one she has now is fug. If you’re going to buy your lady a giant rock, do it Richard Burton style…don’t get her some giant clowdy monstrosity.

        I think they look like a nice couple, but I am honestly done cutting her slack with how everything went down between her divorce and her new fiance. To base a career off of being divorced and attacking the “other woman” via others, and then doing the same thing to another woman doesn’t make me think well of her.

        Especially as it doesn’t seem she has any redeeming qualities at all, and she makes crap movies.

      • Eli says:

        Sal, I find it amusing that you seem to know Aniston personally, and myself, as well.

        .

        “My hate” comment on a JP thread? Just because one comments on an Aniston thread and JP thread, does not make one a hater or lover. I am not a fan of either, but truly get disgusted with all the “personal” bashing. And after reading most of your comments on this thread alone, I will let you decide what category you BELONG in. Take a breath, Sal. Give your fingers a rest!!!

      • Tulip Garden says:

        Eli,
        I mostly don’t comment on threads about JP’s or Aniston b/c the crazy gets unleashed very quickly. Take my advice just read thru them, shake your head, and let it go!

      • Lulu.T.O. says:

        Ooh! I love it when ‘ilk’ starts to get thrown around.

  16. smee says:

    No more rolled up jeans and boots for her?

  17. Ashling says:

    Her skin looks really bad here. It’s the only reason I clicked on this post. Yikes!

    • Midnight says:

      I was going to say the same thing. What happened to her face? And I don’t know what they did to that picture, but they seem to be almost the same height. Not a good look for either of them.

  18. Esmom says:

    They’re cute in their oddly mismatched way. And for those ripping on the condition of her 40-something skin, imagine if she was all botoxed and fillered like Kidman. She’d really be ripped to shreds. I know she can’t win because the hate is so strong but I think I prefer this scenario.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      @Esmom, who wrote: “And for those ripping on the condition of her 40-something skin, imagine if she was all botoxed and fillered like Kidman. She’d really be ripped to shreds.”

      (Blinks) Well, it seems that her skin looks so red and splotchy above because she’s recently had a ‘skin-aide’ or ‘youth enhancement’ process/procedure done; which really ‘would’ place Jen in the ‘all botoxed and fillered’ group, right?

      And are posters here ‘really’ hating on Jen or simply making an observation based on the photo above?

      • gogoGorilla says:

        I know, really? The accusations of haterism are ridiculous on these threads. For the record, I don’t care about Aniston. However, I don’t think her skin is anything to brag about – it looks terrible. That has less to do with her age and more to do with all of the years of sun worshipping.

        And I seriously doubt if there is ANY woman in Hollyweird not getting Botox. Just because she isn’t overdosing on it like Kidman does not mean she isn’t doing it.

  19. Annie says:

    You know, I really don’t see them getting married? I just don’t see it happening. When you keep pushing back the date, you end up cancelling it.

    Reminds me of my friend who got in engaged in September. She has not set a wedding date and refuses to, for no real reason. No engagement party has happened yet. Her fiance is all “Ummm wtf?”.
    I don’t see her actually marrying him.

    • Emily says:

      Yep, and I think it’s her. I think she does not want to be married. But being engaged at the same time Angie and Brad are gets them press, so…

      Note: I neither like nor dislike her, but I am really sick of seeing all of this group on tabloid covers at the supermarket. Boring rich white smug people on every cover, and the same ones every time. I don’t get how they still sell.

  20. Aud says:

    Ah…what a casual stroll…with a bodyguard shadowing you.

  21. Toot says:

    You can really see her age next to Justin in these pics.

    • heyu says:

      Hmm but she is only two yrs older than him tho

      • Nikita says:

        Yes, but he looks younger then her, she looks like 48 in these pics, and yes, like his mom….suggamoma

      • Annie2 says:

        Ooohhh- 48! Yikes- shoot her now! God forbid anyone look that old. Can’t wait for all you age shamers to start getting older. Things start to look different. She looks just fine

    • Blenheim says:

      I m so not a fan but I really think she looks fine for her age. She’s not in her 20 s. Hell she’s not enen in her 30s!

  22. Mitch Buchanan Rocks! says:

    Looking forward to the wedding – hope Hello does the photoshoots.

  23. PHD gossip says:

    When I read Page Six this morning – I definitely thought we were being told something about Justin being out with his buddies. Definitely. This is a gossip page that is so sophisticated that one must read something into it.
    I am totally not kidding.

  24. Emma - the JP Lover says:

    Hmmmm … hat pulled down low over face … huge sunglasses … splotchy skin on her face … looks like someone has had some work done.

  25. Maggie says:

    The comments on here are ridiculous. They both look pretty cool to me.

    • Esmom says:

      Seriously. I am honestly pretty neutral about Jen but I cannot believe the level of hatred she inspires.

      • Sal says:

        You obviously haven’t followed the comments from the regular Aniston fans on here about the other 2 who won’t be named. I’m stunned that people don’t ‘get’ why when her fans stir up so much hatred. Seriously if you don’t get it now, you have not paid attention for the last 3 years on here. Glad to see stirrer Spinner is absent. Or are they back under another nick?

        And putting the trouble-making jenloons on here aside for a moment, thats not even getting into Aniston’s malicious passive-aggressive remarks, her hiring Handler, her encouraging the ‘team’ hatred, throwing Brad (and Angelina and the children) under a bus for 9 years. Ok, wtf? How can people like, *not* ‘get it’ by now? Unless you’ve been living under a rock, its utterly impossible to not understand how she (and her loonie fans in particular) inspires such hatred. Female First is a case in point. Her and her vicious fans are all the inspiration anyone needs, add to it Handler, and the way Aniston has passively-aggressively attacked Angelina and milked this thing for 9 years, its beyond more than enough inspiration and should be self-explanatory. (does the facepalm and bangs head on desk)

      • epiphany says:

        It isn’t hate, it’s criticism, leveled primarily because she and her Huvane driven PR team still persist in milking publicity from a marriage and divorce that happened almost 9 years ago. ‘Oh, when will poor Jen find true love again? Will Justin marry her, or will he break her heart – just like Brad?’ Meanwhile, other cast members from ‘Friends’ – some with genuine talent – probably couldn’t get recognized walking down the street.

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        +1, esmom. A lot of people are just really over-invested in hating this woman.

      • Sal says:

        +1 epiphany.

        Ironically far more people are far over-invested in hating the JPs, but thats ok… Apparently. Funny how these posts never appear on the JP articles. They never seem to notice the astronomical amount of way over-invested haters of the JPs. Funny how they notice the least-hated and not the most hated. smh at the double standards. JA is someone that has the *least* invested people hating her, yet gets the sympathy and not those who TRULY are very intensely hated. smh If anything, its just more inspiration. The double-standards I mean. It really grates on one. To me its just more vindication and adds to the inspiration reasons. Thats the real irony.

      • Ms.Smurf says:

        If I were JA, I would fire Huvane. He doesn’t seem to do anything for her, but deny baby food rumors. We already know that JA reads tabloids and sites like these, so why wouldn’t she have Huvane deny things like pining after BP, or how she hates AJ.

        She denies the most ridiculous things, but ignores the other more “important” things, and has her “friend” attack AJ. Notice it’s not Brad, it’s Angelina. Which leads me to believe that she doesn’t want Brad back, she’s just pisssed off that she isn’t apart of the golden couple anymore, and so on.

        I mean, Chelsea Handler says it all. Telling Brad to go back to his wife! Or the woman who did the Vanity Fair interivew…she said Jen had shown great restraint in the rumors about her husband…they were already divorced!

        Will finish after school…see ya!

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        I think esmom’s point was that crazy stanning either in support or hatred of a celeb is never attractive, ladies. In fact, it petrifies us normal folk.

      • Esmom says:

        @TheOriginalKitten. Yes, thank you. Clearly it’s impossible to make a passing observation on this topic.

        *backs away slowly*

      • Sal says:

        That would be well and good if the normal folk posted it on both sides, not just one. But they never do. They never do, do they? That was my point. They never, ever do that. I’ve seem some of the most irrational, hateful and psychotic posts made about Angelina AND horrific racist names aimed at her children on this board. Where were those like Esmom then? Nowhere to be found, as is usual when haters are making horrible comments on any JP thread. Scarcer than hens teeth. Not one of the regular posters have ever made an attempt to stop the irrational hatred of Angelina. Not one of the regulars on here have ever asked what inspires such hatred of Angelina. Not…..one. Yet I’ve seen a few of the regulars comment about the hatred of Aniston. Yet, she is the LEAST hated of the 3. They never try to make the point on the Jolie threads about hatred for Jolie. They ONLY do it for Aniston. Thats when the double-standards show the true agenda. I’ve been on this board for a couple of years and I’ve yet to see Esmom or others make the statement about not understanding what inspires hatred of Angelina. Not once. Until they do, I and dare I say others won’t take their feigned shock seriously.
        Ah, stuff it. Its like banging ones head against a brick wall. smdh

      • Nikita says:

        @Sal
        + 1000000000

      • Esmom says:

        @Sal I’m sure I’ve commented on AJ posts, although I may or may not have specifically said anything about any hatred aimed toward her. I know recently I said I was impressed with how she seems to have come into her own as a mom despite the naysayers out there about her and BP. Does that qualify?

        In any case I find it baffling that you are ripping me for my apparently imbalanced approach to my comments. I didn’t realize i was being monitored. And now I feel like I really do need to back away slowly…

      • Emily says:

        I have been here for a relatively short time, and I have seen people post fighting back against irrational Angelina Jolie hatred. I, personally, have posted arguing with one racist comment I saw — it was a comment made late, so I think only one other person argued with it. So I’m sorry, Sal, but you’re wrong.

        Also, your rationale doesn’t make much sense. One does not have to hate one of these women if one likes the other. I’m basically indifferent to both of them, though they both annoy me at times. But the problem with the Aniston hate in the comments on this post is that a lot of it is ridiculously sexist. Saying she looks ancient, calling her a sugarmamma just because she’s two whole years older than her boyfriend. Sexist criticism is never okay, no matter how obnoxious the target of it is.

      • Sal says:

        I’m sorry if you think I’m ripping into you Esmom, but I feel my point is a very valid point. How come no one ever states “I don’t get what is it about Angelina that inspires so much hatred”? It really does my head in the amount of people that are ‘shocked’ (after all this time) that Aniston is hated yet she doesn’t get one hundredth the hatred the JPs get. If you were going to write a post pondering why a celeb inspires hated, Aniston would be the very last celeb I would ever think of writing it about. It just seems so unfair and so hypocritical. People can always seem to find a way to ponder the hate Aniston gets, but for some odd reason, they never do with Angelina. And she is the only one who ever really truly gets any hatred. I don’t get it.

        Emily, I’m sorry but there is a BIG difference between calling someone an evil slut who needs to die and her daughter looks like a mong who has Down Syndrome, and commenting about looks. The latter is so benign it barely even qualifies as hate. THAT is why it frustrates me so much because what Aniston gets is nowhere NEAR hate, compared to Jolie. Going on about looks or age is nothing.

      • videli says:

        Sal, you’re off your rocker. And I don’t care how demented the Jolie bashers are, there’s no reason to keep them company.

      • Sal says:

        Videli please point out any flaws in my logic in any of my posts.

      • Sal says:

        Let me clarify that when talking about looks such a child having DS, I was talking about mocking a child and calling them the retard word because of their facial features, as opposed to looks of the adults ie orange face/feet/hair/age. I don’t engage in the comments on Aniston’s chin for example, as those are things she can’t help and its petty and spiteful. I personally feel that there is a big difference to picking on facial features and commenting on a person over-tanning. As a woman, also I don’t like sexist comments, but I feel its so unbelievably benign and harmless, especially when done by another woman, compared to saying “haha she is so evil thats why she has a Downie child”, or “it would be good if Zahara died of AIDS” or (when Jolie released her In The Land of Blood and Honey movie about rape) “she hurt Jen so I wish she and her bastard children were anally raped and with something sharp too”, which was a real comment by someone on Facebook. Everyday women make comments about the looks of other women and their men. Thats commonplace. BUT wishing children died of AIDS or them and their mother was raped plus a few hundred other things, is TRUE SHEER HATRED. Commenting on tanner and the celebs boyfriend is not and does not qualify as hatred compared to the former. Commenting on age isn’t actually hate either. I have yet to see any true unadulterated sheer vicious hatred of Aniston like Jolie has had levelled at her.

        Videli, qualify that statement and show where you disagree with my logic. Everything I have said has been matter of fact common sense.

      • Emily says:

        I will never understand the logic of saying, “another situation is worse, therefore this situation is perfectly acceptable.” So no one should be upset when they break a leg, because some people lose theirs? Sexism is never benign.

        And why is it necessary to compare what people say about Aniston to what they say about Jolie? How about comparing Aniston to, I dunno, Goop? Portman? Katie Holmes? There’s this extremely strange insistence on bringing Jolie up when Aniston’s the subject, and vice versa. It’s phenomenally creepy.

        It is entirely possible to condemn more than one thing at a time. One can both criticize the sexism directed at Aniston AND the stuff you’re describing that’s directed at Jolie. You don’t have to pick and choose, nor do you have to insult one of the women just because you like the other.

      • videli says:

        Sal, I don’t give a hoot about your logic. Getting into the minutia of it all would mean sharing your madness. What’s with your emotional involvement in this? Do you think you’re making the world a better place by ‘denouncing’ a celebrity? Aren’t there any good causes in real life?

        But I believe that anonymous internet communication have yielded a yet to be determined number of uncategorized conditions, something like trolling personality disorder or severely misplaced crusader mania. If I’d have a friend like this, I’d give her a bong for her birthday, in order to RELAX!

      • Esmom says:

        Not sure why I feel inclined to open myself up for more wrath but I clearly haven’t read the same posts as other people have because I have never heard such vile things about AJ and her kids posted here. Sure, people rip on her. But no more viciously than on anyone else. I thought this was an equal opportunity snark fest.

      • Janet says:

        @Videli: I wish Sal was exaggerating or fabricating some of those remarks made about Jolie and her children. Unfortunately, she isn’t. I’ve seen them all and a few more besides. The level of hate out there among Aniston’s fans for Jolie and her children is stratospheric.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        Ladies …

        The point is this: posters usually let the hateful comments on an AJ thread pass, because ultimately the comments are simply opinions. That is …

        You won’t see someone call a poster ‘hater’ or have them ask ‘why do you hate this woman so much?’ until the ‘she’s a drugged out, brother kissing, husband stealing, ‘whore’ comments.

        Nothing … I repeat, NOTHING posted in this thread equals those comments. People posting here truly are just giving voice to opinions formed from the photo above or photos that have been posted here at “Celebitchy.”

        Can you seriously deny that Jen’s skin doesn’t look red, splotchy, and puffy in the photos above? Can you seriously deny that Jen look’s ‘much’ shorter than Justin in the photos above? Can you deny that–for whatever reason–Jen looks ‘older’ than usual in the photos above? Can you deny that Jen is wearing flip-flops in the photos above? And let’s face facts here … Jen does have a large jaw/chin, just like Angie has large lips.

        These are all ‘observations’ and ‘opinions’ made in this thread that are clearly based upon how Jen looks in the photos above. Do you remember the little old lady asking “Where’s the beef?” Well … where’s the hate?

        Perhaps it ‘is’ the fact we can ‘all’ plainly see Jen has just had some work done that makes her fans so defensive in that ‘projection’ kind of way.

      • lisa2 says:

        @Sal

        I agree with so much of what you said. And yes there are people who are overly sensitive only as it relates to Jennifer Aniston.

        if they look at it Jennifer has only really gotten some negative over the last couple of years. And the JP fans can contest to the fact that we have seen nasty attacks on this couple from the moment they got together.

        Not to worry. There will be some post on Brad or Angie before the end of the week. And I will sit and wait to read these same people come forward with that “they don’t understand all the hate”.. but I won’t be holding my breath.. I got too much life to live.

  26. DuckyGirl says:

    Her ring looks like a big chip of dirty plastic

  27. kay says:

    that’s awkward considering that every guy i know wears skinny jeans. I legit don’t think I know a 21 year old that doesn’t wear them

    • Maggie says:

      Maybe everyone else on here is a hick because I dont know anyone who doesnt wear skinny jeans either.

      • Joanna says:

        or maybe we’re women that remember the good old days. When men looked like men, and didn’t wear girls’ jeans.

    • videli says:

      Skinny jeans are better for short guys. My husband is 6’4″ and the thought of him in skinny jeans makes me heave.

    • Kim1 says:

      He’s 41 not 21

      • The Original G says:

        I think his jeans are fine. He looks like an arty village millionaire. He looks right in place. She looks like an uncomfortable visitor.

    • Esmom says:

      Yes but isn’t he almost twice the age of a 21-year-old? I actually think he’s pulling them off just fine but certain fashions after a certain age seem a bit try hard. Skinny jeans on most aging men are an example of that.

    • Joanna says:

      well, I’m 37 and I don’t care what the style is or what the young guys wear. I would never in a million years date a guy that wore skinny jeans.

    • UghInsomnia says:

      My husband is 33 and wears skinny jeans. He’s not “too old” for them, nor does he look ridiculous or try hard.

  28. The Original G says:

    Flips flops in NYC? Yuck. I think the outfit is fine. It’s a Cali kind of look, but hey, she’s a Cali girl.

    Can we talk about the hat and glasses? She looks like Micheal Jackson in disguise.

  29. Janet says:

    WTF happened to her face? Did she get a bad chemical peel or what? She looks godawful. She looks like she could be his mother in that photo.

    The ring looks like something out of a vending machine.

  30. ALG says:

    She never changes her look. Same blah hair, always down and always covering up her huge jaw, same orange tan, same same same. Her fiance looks like a Danny Zukko wannabe.

  31. Bee says:

    The reason I and others point out her terrible, sun damaged skin is because her fans, her publicist and the media go on about how Youthful her skin is!!! How youthful she is, how she GLOWS.

    In fact, her skin in natural daylight looks 44 and older.

    Also there are pics of her with her sweater undone and there is no bump. People need to give up their hopes of a baby. She will be 45 soon and seems to be in no hurry, which you have to be when you are half way to 50!!!!!!

  32. heyu says:

    is the the ny post article supposed to be intriguing???so he went out with a group of his friends on friday, big deal!!!

    aniston was also pictured attending a broadway play with some girlfriends that same friday….

    http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/jennifer-aniston-sports-new-eyewear-article-1.1341387

    are they meant to be joined at the hip 24/7 ????

    there also pics of jen and justin on a double date with another couple on sat.
    http://eonline.com/news/417844/jennifer-aniston-and-justin-theroux-enjoy-dinner-date-in-new-york-city

    the male of the couple is michael mcdonald he owns a music agency called mick management ; representing artist like john mayer , Ray LaMontagne and a few others>i knw he’s been mayers manager for more than 11Yrs.

    i guess its his wife that is friends with aniston cos i have seen several pics of the two ladies together over the years(maybe thats even hw aniston and mayer were introduced to each other)

  33. Lulu.T.O. says:

    Do we have an ID on her sandals?? I want them.

    She looks fine to me. I personally love to layer like this. Then you don’t have to worry if your butt looks good. 😛

  34. Ginger says:

    I’m a bag girl too so I’m also looking at that cool purse. I could care less about the rest. So it’s still cold in NY while its getting prematurely hot here in Vegas. This Summer is going to be brutal!

  35. Hautie says:

    I am beginning to wonder if Aniston’s ring is a peridot. A pale green stone that has tendency to look a little foggy. They are pretty stones.

    But I agree, it simply does not look like a diamond.

    I do like the idea of a colored stone for an engagement ring. I have seen some stunning aquamarine center stones for engagement rings… that I would love to have.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      I definitely want a non-diamond/non-traditional colored stone for an engagement ring. I would even go for an emerald but aquamarine would be nice too.

    • Janet says:

      Why would she want a peridot? If I was getting a colored stone for an engagement ring I’d want my birthstone. She was born in February; her birthstone is an amethyst.

      I think she went for quantity over quality and bought the biggest diamond she could find, never mind its clarity. And yes, I think she paid for it.

      • Emily says:

        If I were to get a colored stone for an engagement ring, I’d want a sapphire, and that is not my birthstone.

        I don’t think it’s a peridot, though; I think it’s an antique. Also, it is huge, and Justin and Jen are both very wealthy and can afford big diamonds, but they are not so wealthy that they can necessarily afford the clearest big diamonds. I think they sacrificed clarity for size — or maybe they just like it. Neither of them has taste anything like mine, so it’s not surprising I don’t like the ring either.

      • Kim1 says:

        Who made her ring? I have never heard who was her jeweler.They usually say a ring was co designed by the groom to be and Neil Lane or Harry Winston orLorraine Schwartz,Robert Procop,etc Why has no jeweler taken credit for this ring?

      • Sal says:

        As to the ring, I’ve never seen a clear in focus up close shot of it so I don’t know what to think of it.

      • Janet says:

        @Kim1: Maybe none of those jewelers you mentioned wants to be held responsible for that ring.

        @Emily: Aniston is sitting on $150 million. It’s not like she can’t afford a good quality diamond. She just went for the biggest rock she could find, no matter how tacky it looked.

      • pwal says:

        Maybe the jeweler was high when he cut it.

    • gogoGorilla says:

      It is definitely not a peridot. My engagement ring is a peridot surrounded by diamonds and it is a brilliant green stone – people often mistake it for an emerald (and compliment me on it all the time, it is gorgeous and very unusual).

      I wonder if her ring looks better up close. I think we’re just used to seeing brilliantly clear diamonds on celebs. I really love going off the beaten path on jewelry so I wish she would give a little more info on it so we could actually know what it’s supposed to be. Everyone seems to assume it’s supposed to be a very clear diamond but perhaps that’s not what it is at all.

    • Lulu.T.O. says:

      I’d go for s Labradorite! Or Chrysaprase(sp).

    • Janet says:

      I googled some pictures of peridots. They run the gamut from light green to deep green, but none of them are the milky off-white color of Aniston’s ring. I think her ring is a diamond with a bad cut and a lot of impurities.

  36. The Original Mia says:

    She is looking jowly in these pictures. Wonder what’s going on with her body. It could be hormonal, but wouldn’t that effect everything not just her face.

    Can we talk about the skinny jeans? You’re over 30 and heterosexual. Please wear regular jeans.

  37. pk says:

    I can’t believe I’m saying this but Justin actually looks pretty hot here!

  38. MousieBrown says:

    It’s so funny that people think that’s just a bad cloudy diamond – why would he waste money on one? I think it could be a rose-cut diamond – that’s becoming a popular cut again, and they do not look like the common sparkly diamond.

  39. HorsePoor Hanna says:

    She’s pregnant.Why else carry diaper bag??

  40. Emily says:

    She’s begging for someone to step on her foot and crush it in those flip-flops. Or to get tetanus. Totally wrong for NYC.

    The rest is fine. It’s NYC, not LA: the weather is not always appropriate for a tank top. She’s wearing basically the same things the guys are wearing. Though actually I wouldn’t wear that long sweater-blanket thing in NYC either, as it would get caught in something. I guess she’s just going from taxi to high-end empty store.

    • Original Me says:

      I like her cargo pants. I love them too and I have one pair I have been wearing since 1998. I am however, concerned about her gray mom-pris. I am a mom and I refuse to wear capri pants because they just do nothing for me, or really for anyone else. Just not feeling the white pants either. I really like Jen’s style normally, but I don’t like what she’s wearing in the NYC photos. She should have super skinny jeans and wedges on or something. Maybe she’s having a style identity crisis.

  41. taxi says:

    They both look very orange, as in bad fake tan or odd camera exposure.

    His legs are almost as short as hers & his torso is disproportionately longer than normal.

  42. Paloma says:

    I am considering they will be one of the Hollywood couples who stay engaged but never marry.

  43. annie says:

    It was Cold in NYC yesterday. How is she walking around in sandals? Maybe that is the reason for the wrap.

  44. Meanchick says:

    I don’t think they will get married. I think JA is waiting for BP, I really do. I think if BP left AJ today, JA would dump JT two seconds later. She is obvious in everyting she does, whether she does is herself or through someone else. All of her snark is aimed at AJ, but not at the man who left her for AJ. She can’t risk angering him by telling the truth, because, well, he might take her back one day. Pathetic.

    • Mac says:

      I doubt she’s interested in Brad. He looks like a bloated David Spade now and he has about six kids.

      • Kim1 says:

        Jen loves kids according to her friends and publicists LMAO.Bloated David Spade + Orange,Puffy Iggy Pop =Golden( Middle Age )Couple

  45. Bella says:

    she is so phoney,she wants everyone to think she finally found love…what she found was a $$$$$ man..her $$$$$!! lol
    She will never ever compare to ANGIE AND BRAD.

  46. KellyinSeattle says:

    1) They are the same color as Oompa Loompas.
    2) I agree, her skin looks really bad and her hair, not much better.
    3) Heidi Bivens has a lot more class than JA…she could’ve written a tell-all but didn’t
    4) Congratulations to Vince Vaughn love him) and his wife, who welcomed a new baby girl!!
    5) If I were her, and I’m not, but if I hated the tabloids I’d probably move and buy myself an island or something.
    6) Justin…anyone ever see him in an interview or anything? Just wondering how he sounds/talks…
    7) Jen is short and has no waist, does not have a killer body.
    8) She does look like Michael Jackson, but without the talent.
    9) I wish they could laugh at themselves and not take themselves so seriously…
    10) Yes, I’m a bitch, but somebody has to do it!

    • Sugar says:

      if I were Heidi ( who at one time used to move about NYC freely with Justin) saw these pictures of him with his new lady love and a body guard I’d be just shaking my head & wondering if I ever really knew him.
      I always thought he was cool until he became the future mr. aniston now he’s a pathetic kept man.

  47. DAFFY says:

    the HAT doesnt draw any attention …..not a bit

    • Suze says:

      Ha! Exactly.

      She looks like I do when I dress for the day thinking the weather is going to be one thing and it turns out to be quite another – and I have to haphazardly layer.

  48. LandFar says:

    I don’t like his face. it’s like a golddigging rodent.

  49. Val says:

    He looks really good here, but she looks rough.

  50. janie says:

    Can’t she just go away, please?

  51. Patrice says:

    Kaiser-Even if you look at close ups of the ring, you’re right, it IS cloudy but I guess that’s intentional (and how Justin could afford such a sizeable stone himself. *cough*). Reports were that is a natural diamond in the rough although that can’t entirely be true because it is also cut into a large cushion shape….

    Side note: If the cut of my man’s jeans are “skinnier” than mine, we have a serious problem. Just sayin’.

  52. Joanna says:

    i don’t get the level of hatred aimed at jen. I don’t think she has the level of control over her friends that people think she does. I thin her friends have her back, whether she asks them to or not. i don’t get the hatred toward someone who is a stranger to all of us. i don’t care enough to hate her.

    who cares what an effing stranger does? the way some of these people act, you’d think she’d committed a murder. jeez

    • epiphany says:

      Okay, last time, then I’m going to bed, It is NOT hate. You’re right, we don’t know Jen , so we can’t hate her. This is criticism – she and her crack PR team open up every aspect of her life to us, so we are entitled to criticize it as much as we want. When you make a skincare company describe you as “the beautiful Jennifer Aniston” in the voiceover for a commercial, you better have flawless skin – clearly, she doesn’t. These photos indicate what she looks like when she doesn’t spend any time in a makeup artist’s chair – not a pretty sight. She continues to use her failed marriage and her woeful search for love as the basis for her popularity. If she would fire Huvane, live a quiet life focusing on her craft, take small, character driven roles in independent films, maybe try an off Broadway play – in other words concentrate on being an actor rather than a celebrity, we would have far more respect for her. Clearly, being famous is the most important thing to her. NYC is THE place for celebrities to walk around unnoticed. I used to live there, and saw someone famous on the street a couple of times a week. They weren’t being chased by paps, or even fans. Aniston could easily slip in and out of Manhattan IF she instructed her PR to lay off. Clearly, she craves the attention, her protests to the contrary notwithstanding.

  53. Joanna says:

    btw, justin looks effing hot!

  54. Scarlett says:

    She’s been looking rough lately..wonder if there is trouble behind the scenes? She always looks so annoyed. Hope she has an iron clad pre-nup in place.

  55. Scarlett says:

    He always looks so contrived from head to toe..like he spends an in inordinate amount of time getting ready..picking out his outfits..making sure his hair lays in a certain direction….making sure his facial hair scruff is just so. But then again, apparently she spends a sh*t load of time in order to get that sunkissed, natural look. I think he still takes more time to get ready which annoys her.

  56. Auj says:

    How come none of these so-called “engaged” couples never get married? They are just eternally “engaged”?

  57. Amy says:

    Am I the only one here who likes both JA and AJ? I mean, if I had to join one “team,” I guess it would be Team Jolie, but I have a warm feeling for my Rachel Green, too. I do feel sorry for Jen because she can’t seem to get away from Brangelina in the public’s opinion. She’s rarely if ever mentioned in any story without Brad coming into it somewhere. I’m sure the end of her marriage was as dreadful and painful as it would have been for anyone else, particularly with the emotional (and probably physical) infidelity and the fact that it all played out so publicly. I just wonder if we the public are having a harder time letting it go than she is.

  58. MsTaken says:

    Jen’s complexion & baggy clothes signal too much alcohol. Waaaay too much. She be bloated.

    And her ring? Def NOT a quality diamond. I have a beautiful little sparkler that even on its dirtiest day glistens in the light! It puts Jen’s huge rock to shame. I love mine!

    IMO, men/whomever should pick smaller, quality stones that sparkle over huge dull ones for engagement rings. (I’m looking at you, KK!) My MIL’s ring is quite small, but never fails to catch the light and is understatedly impressive!