Duchess Kate planning for a natural birth, she is NOT ‘too posh to push’

The Daily Mail has an EPIC story about what’s going to happen when Duchess Kate goes into labor, and what happens when she gives birth and how the birth will be announced and what Prince William will be doing the whole time, etc. It’s exhaustive – you can read the full thing here. I’m just going to cover the highlights, most of which are about the Duchess Beav and whether or not she’s “too posh to push”.

The Duchess of Cambridge is planning to give birth naturally and has chosen the same private hospital where her husband was born to deliver the future baby king or queen, royal sources revealed today. The royal mother-to-be is definitely not ‘too posh to push’ and wants – unless nature intervenes – to opt for a natural birth rather than an elective caesarean section like many celebrity figures, MailOnline understands.

Kate, 31, who is expecting her first baby in mid-July, will give birth to the new third-in-line-to-the-throne at the private Lindo Wing of St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington, west London, where Prince William was delivered in 1982. Significantly, our sources also strongly hinted that Kate’s family – particularly her mother, Carole Middleton, and sister, Pippa – are likely to be present at the hospital during her labour. Remarkably, this means that the Middleton family may learn the sex of the new-born future king or queen before even the present Queen herself.

Sources have told MailOnline that Kate is particularly keen to have her family around her as anxious father-to-be William, 30, may be on duty in North Wales, where he is still working as a Search and Rescue pilot at RAF Valley on Anglesey, when the baby arrives. William is said to be determined to make it to the delivery suite, following in the footsteps of his own father who broke royal tradition to be with his wife, Diana, Princess of Wales, for the birth of both their children. As a result, plans are currently being formulated by palace aides to whisk him down to London by helicopter so he can be present at his son or daughter’s birth.

‘He very much plans to be at the birth but between now and then will also be on and off duty in North Wales, meaning he might have to get there rather swiftly,’ said a source. ‘It could be by train or car if he is up in Anglesey, but should a helicopter be available then that is also a strong possibility.’

Helicopters aside, the future king is not expecting any special treatment and is due to take just two weeks’ statutory paternity leave – for which he will be paid £136.78 a week – before returning to his normal shift pattern.

His wife, however, will definitely not return with him to their home on Anglesey with the new baby. A palace spokesman said today that there was ‘still some discussion’ about where Kate and their new-born will be based as a result. But the Daily Mail has already revealed that she plans to move in with her parents at their £4.8million Berkshire mansion for around six weeks after William returns to work as builders are still finishing their new apartment at Kensington Palace.

It is understood that contingency plans have been put in place with other hospitals, such as the Royal Berkshire in Reading, in case the Duchess goes into labour when visiting her parents.

But a source told the Mail: ‘As was demonstrated when the Duchess fell ill with a pregnancy-related sickness last year while staying with her parents in Berkshire, she can she be whisked in a private car to central London within an hour. So it is very unlikely she will give birth anywhere else than St Mary’s, quite frankly.’

Unusually, palace officials will make public the fact that the Duchess has gone into labour within minutes of her being admitted to hospital and being seen by a doctor. While palace aides are keen to retain Kate’s ‘dignity’ as a woman in labour, they acknowledge the fact that social media such as Twitter will make it almost impossible… although both Buckingham Palace and Clarence House have their own Twitter accounts on which details of royal events are frequently now broken, it will – blessedly, some might say – most definitely not be the preferred medium to announce the new royal baby. Instead a formal notice on a piece of creamy A4 size Buckingham Palace-headed paper, signed by the medical staff who have assisted the Duchess, will be brought out of the Lindo’s front entrance by a press officer.

It will then be handed to a waiting driver and driven through the streets of London – escorted by police outriders – to the Privy Purse Door at the front of Buckingham Palace. There it will then be placed on an easel, last used to announce Prince William’s birth, by the main gates in the palace forecourt. This will signify to an eager public that a new royal baby has been born. However if the baby is born between 10.30pm and 8am, the news will be sent out via press release with the easel being erected later that morning, at around 9am.

MailOnline understands that William himself is likely to phone the Queen before anyone else, even his own father, depending on what time of day the baby is born.

‘Clearly if they are together the Middleton family will be informed pretty quickly….efforts will be made to contact the Queen soon after and members of the royal family will be told as soon as is practically possible. Whether they are woken depends on what time of day it was,’ the source added.

It is also hoped that William will make a short statement on the steps of the hospital after the good news has been dispersed – as will the Middletons, although the mechanics of this have yet to be discussed.

‘While it is a deeply personal and private event, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge realise this is a time of national celebration and that there will be vast interest in the baby. They realise many people will want to share in their happiness,’ a spokesman said.

[From The Mail]

All of the stuff about putting a notice outside of Buckingham Palace seems rather creepy to me, but then again, I’m not English. The Mail also says that for sure, William and Kate don’t know the baby’s gender and various sources have told the other tabloids that Kate has done up the nurseries (there are multiple nurseries because they have several homes) in all-neutral colors, all creams and beiges. While I think it’s nice/sweet that Carole Middleton is determined to be at the hospital when her first child is born, I do think the idea of dueling photocalls, one for William and one for the Middletons, seems sort of wrong. The day should be about Kate and the baby, not the Middleton family.

As for all of the stuff about what William will do if he’s “working”… ha. Yeah. We’ll see. I bet Kate manages to give birth on William’s “day off”. And if he really was so concerned, why didn’t he save up his vacation days so he could be around more in the final weeks of her pregnancy? Oh, right. Ha.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

56 Responses to “Duchess Kate planning for a natural birth, she is NOT ‘too posh to push’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Pixie says:

    The BBC were publishing all the plans yesterday. I think it’s just royal protocol…I wouldn’t be happy if everyone had to know everything about my birthing plans though!

    • phaksi says:

      Is it really protocol to reveal all these details though. Surely no one will be bothered if they dont tell us what kind of birth plan they. They are revealing all of this now but when the baby comes they will be crying privacy.

      • Pixie says:

        Yeah, I thought it was all a bit weird. But I guess there hasn’t been a royal baby for a while and this was how they did things when William and Harry were due? I don’t know, I just assumed it was the done thing haha (if not then it’s definately a bit weird!)

      • LAK says:

        It’s all part of the PR plan to make them seem ‘normal’.

        It’s irritating that they keep pushing this ‘we are normal’ agenda when a) they are not. b) they behave in ways that demonstrate that they don’t know or understand what ‘normal’ is according to the average person.

        ‘Normal’ is very subjective anyway, so they should do what is ‘normal’ for them and stop trying to be ‘normal’ as prescribed by focus groups.

        I wish they would follow HM and Charles rules of silence. All this information they keep giving out raises expectations, and if they don’t follow through, cry ‘invasion of privacy’ should anyone inquiry about their different actions.

    • LadyMTL says:

      I find it kind of eyebrow raising that anyone would really care to know sooooo much about the procedures and etc, but I know this is nothing new as far as these royal births go. Still, I’d be a bit annoyed if everyone had my “itinerary” in hand while I was trying to squeeze a baby out of my body. 😛

  2. mkyarwood says:

    I figured if my mom could do it three times, certainly I would at least try. Similarly, if the Queen has to push, EVERYONE does.

  3. Red Snapper says:

    What, no word yet on the `push present`? The Daily Fail is really slacking off. Except in bootlicking eg calling her the Duchess instead of Kate Middleton.

  4. Lizzie says:

    I really really hate that term “too posh to push”, it drives me up the wall! So what if a woman doesn’t want a natural labour!? The thought of pushing a large object out of your hoo-ha doesn’t really appeal to me either. Ugh…I just hate that term!

    I also really like the info being posted up on the palace, it’s cute! I’m hoping if it’s a girl they go for Alexandra…just not Diana, for the love of God!

    • JenD says:

      I hate the “too posh to push” too. Ugh.

    • teehee says:

      Its nonsensical. There is no “posh” way to have a baby unless it teleports from your body to the outside- eiter c-section or vaginal, your body is going to not be “so posh” during and after pregnancy and delivery (exception: surrogate for the richies).

    • Emily says:

      I hate the term “baby bump” and find it disgusting and idiotic but that one is probably here to stay too.

    • bluhare says:

      And I hate the words preggers and preggo.

    • Suze says:

      I agree wholeheartedly on “too posh to push”, “preggers”, “push present” and “baby bump”.

      All this cutesy-wootsy verbiage around pregnancy has just made it’s way into the media in the last five years or so and I find it vile.

      That said, the duchess can push or have a c-section or do whatever she has to do to deliver the royal heir and not one bit of it is my business.

  5. DanaG says:

    It’s tradition to post the notice at BP has been done forever. The Queen had natural births, Anne did and so did Diana. No real surprise Kate will if everything is ok. It wouldn’t take William that long to get to her if she does go into labour early unlike most people he can get a helicopter whenever he wants too.

  6. Al says:

    I think Victoria would be nice.

    • Colu says:

      Victoria Diana Carole I like. Or Elizabeth Diana Carole. Why are so many people saying not to use Diana? It’s a way to remember and honor his mother.

      • Emily says:

        That poor child, if born a female, will be compared to Diana already her whole life and of course will never measure up… because noone ever measures up to the dead!
        Those two boys honour their mother already in so many ways, there is no need to name their first born after her. Plus it isn’t a traditional royal name and is also pretty old fashioned… Elizabeth and Victoria are names still used a lot now…
        I hope the first name they choose (not the 80 middle names) is a more original one than Victoria or Elizabeth… Maybe an Alexandra? Something we haven’t had ‘recently’

      • mayamae says:

        There’s no way in hell that child will have Kate’s mom or dad’s name in it’s name.

  7. Sweethomechicago says:

    I was terrified of giving birth. I’ve done it twice & there is nothing more empowering for a woman. It is truly amazing. A csection cuts thru your stomach muscles & is much longer to recover. Also, i think there’s something about the baby going thru the birth canal that makes him/her lungs stronger. Can’t remember where i heard that.

    • Isa says:

      It helps push the amniotic fluid out of their lungs. My son was born by csection and he had that problem.

    • Marigold says:

      Going through the birth canal tends to push fluids out of the baby (including their lungs). This is why section babies often have a “puffy” look upon birth. They have retained the fluids.

    • Sam says:

      Most c-sections now do NOT cut the ab muscles. They are pulled to the side. I asked my doctor about this and he was very clear that only the most dire emergency c-sections now result in cutting. So the idea that they cut the muscles in now largely misinformation.

      • Colu says:

        They cut me for both. The first was emergency (Oct 2009) and the second was scheduled (November 2011). Both were awful, during and after, for me. A friend of mine had her c-section via the muscle stretch and recovered much quicker.

      • FLORC says:

        Thanks Sam
        I was about to have a fit. C-Sections are not what they use to be. And Kate’s C-Section will absolutely be the best C-Section as far as reduced scaring and recovery. Plus she has an army of nannies so she won’t have to lift a finger for weeks if she cares not to.

        I think it’s really important to remember here how often we’ve been told about Kate’s plans and how often she’s not followed through with them. The only way i’ll buy that natural birth is if i’m in the room.

        It really shouldn’t matter as long as the baby is healthy.

      • Seagulls says:

        Does it really matter (she asks, rhetorically)? I had a c-section in which, I am assuming, my muscles were just pushed apart rather than being sliced. I still had large incision, my uterus was still cut open, etc. It’s better than it was before, but this is still major abdominal surgery no matter how to slice it (an unintentional pun I’m leaving!).

      • FLORC says:

        Seagulls
        No. It really doesn’t matter if it’s a c-section or not. It’s just very likely we’re being told it’ll be a natural birth as a cover. You can’t believe what is being released about them and the PR agenda, because so often they’re caught doing to opposite. If she said nothing and has a c-section that’s fine.

        Also, c-sections have come a long way. The incision will be large, but the scar will be tiny with a plastic surgeon’s suture skills. that’s my only beef here. That this is just the same as saying she’ll do more work and have more charities only to cancel on them as they suffer from lack of fund raising. I know. I’ve got my bitch pants on today. I just don’t believe what they say until there’s real follow through.

    • MollyB says:

      “There’s nothing more empowering FOR ME.” There, I fixed that for you.

  8. Liz says:

    Duchess Beav – I like it. Can that be her new moniker?

  9. Micki says:

    …”‘It could be by train or car if he is up in Anglesey, but should a helicopter be available then that is also a strong possibility.’…

    I vote for a submarine.

    Her plans for giving birth depressed me a bit. I would have loved to have my mum at my side but the half family AND Will… reminds be of Middle Ages wedding night deflowering with the half village witnessing it.

    • LAK says:

      Don’t forget the Queen’s 2 doctors.

      That titbit makes me think of the tradition of royal births infront of the privy council [or ladies of the court] to ensure that baby is ‘of body’ and not a changeling.

      I know we don’t do that any more, but every time i read that the two Drs are going to be present, that’s what i think of.

      • Micki says:

        Yes, I was so glad there were only the team (of 4? 5?) and my husband.
        I haven’t insisted on him and left him decide whether he wants it.
        Still plenty of people were around.

        Seriously I’d feel constipated with so many relatives and strangers around.

    • BooBooKitty says:

      It’s doubtful they’ll be in the delivery room, probably as it’s mentioned a suite there’ll be an anteroom for family to wait in.

  10. JL says:

    I hate these kind of details being put out there for analysis.

    No woman should have to defend how she has her child and be ridiculed for being too posh to push. It’s a decision for 1) the health of the child 2) the health of the mother….

    Like a C-Section is a piece of cake?

    I’m sure some women go c-section and tummy tuck. Ugh just Ugh.

    But then many, many women schedule induction bc they are just tired of being pregnant. I know women on assistance that have done it….how is that different – still putting your self before your child.

    • FLORC says:

      JL
      I agree.
      It’s their body carrying the baby and giving birth to it. It’s their choice on how they’ll give birth. I feel that reading these tid bits are all BS for PR purposes. It’s too common that they paint a picture of the future and it isn’t followed through though and that kind of fibbing bugs me.

      The tummy tuck post c-section is like a bundled package that a lot of women get. It is putting yourself and your vanity before your child. And C-sections are very much improved now. Especially if you get the top doctors to perform it.

      • Emily says:

        How is getting a tummy tuck putting yourself ahead of your child? It’s not like anything is different for the kid if you’ve had a tummy tuck… Baby just has a mama with a less saggy tum.

      • FLORC says:

        Emily
        Generally a tummy tuck is optional unless the woman has excess skin that would inhibit their ability to take care of their newborn. Octomom and Kate with her 8 are decent examples of this. If you don’t need it though it would only increase recovery time for a woman that needs to take care of her newborn. Unless she has a fleet of nannies. So if you choose a procedure with only superficial benefits that will also extend recovery time so you can’t properly attend to your child in it’s first few days that selfish imo.

        Of course, Kate will not be the major influence in the child’s life from day one. That’s not how royal children are raised. It’s a harsh reality.

  11. mslewis says:

    Maybe all this info is because of the rumors and speculation about a c-section. Also, the birth announcement has always been posted on pretty cream-colored paper on the fence outside of Buck Palace. It is historically correct. You can look it up. I think it’s only done for the first-born heir. And the baby’s name might not be told right away. We didn’t know William’s name for about a week after his birth.

    In William’s job he (and everybody else) works two weeks on and two weeks off and all the soldiers volunteer to fill in for who ever needs it. William will have no problem being at the delivery. (All emergency workers like firefighters, paramedics, etc. who need to be available 24/7 work in shifts like that.)

  12. Thinker says:

    Giving birth is going to be the most work Kate has been expected to do since… Well… Since ever.

    A little bit odd that Carole and Pippa are more likely to be present for the birth than William… He seems really checked out?

    • Emily says:

      Noone knows the ins and outs of someone elses marriage – who are we to say how involved he is…

      Plus he has been raised royal and has been trained to be a lot more solemn and calm in exciting situations… Kate and her family would be like the rest of us, squeeling in excitement and rushing around, everything a bit hassled/stressed/exciting blur.

  13. Bodhi says:

    Well, I wish her luck. I was able to follow my birth plan all the way through, but I’m well aware that I got lucky. I also learned to not share my plans too much. I can’t count the number of times people said “oh yeah, you’ll change your mind when labor starts. You don’t have to be a hero, etc.”, especially here on CB

    • wiffie says:

      Yes!! I planned for natural and drug free, and I was quickly tired of the “pfff. We’ll see how long that lasts!”

      I did it, assholes. So there.

      I wonder if she means drug/epidural free when she says natural? That’s what I think of. Or if it’s just a more polite way to say “vaginal”.

      • wiffie says:

        When I picture her in labor, I picture her quietly in bed, stoic and waving. and just pursing her lips to push. Then smiling, tucking her hair behind her ears, holding her baby, and then smiling and waving for the cameras in a soft pink delivery coat dress and sausage curls.

      • sarah says:

        Yes, natural = vaginal. It’s funny how depending on who you’re talking to “natural” can mean such different things!

  14. Emily C. says:

    C-sections are usually much more dangerous to the mother than normal labor, they cause more long-term pain, and they take longer to recover from. Obviously they’re sometimes necessary, but how did they get this reputation as the easy way out?

    • FLORC says:

      Emily C.
      There are just a few facts here you’re missing.
      Kate will be tended to with the best medical care that we can only dream of. C-sections have come a long way and are not as hard on the body as many women here can claim from personal experience. Much has changed and even the scarring is minimal.

      There’s also the stigma of the “stretched out vagina” And the cone shaped head vaginal births can give. The squeezing over the soft bone that has yet to fuse can reshape the baby’s head, but only slightly. And then there’s just the mother being sick of being pregnant or wanting to have her baby born on a certain day. All selfish reason to have a procedure intended for the health of the mother and baby.

      • Emily C. says:

        Okay, then if they really do lead to less pain and no more complications than traditional labor, what’s wrong with that?

      • LAK says:

        Emily C. – I don’t understand why people are so riled up about C-sections. I especially hate the rational that it isn’t ‘natural’ when every medical assistance, from pain meds for a simple headache to Dentistry to heart surgery is unnatural, and yet these very same people will happily indulge in these types of interventions whilst judging negatively C-Sections.

      • mayamae says:

        Emily C –

        It’s a big deal because no matter what anyone says their are higher risks to mother and child. If you’re willing to ignore that, the healthcare costs and labor are significantly increased which is considerable if you’re doing the surgery for non-medical reasons.

  15. TheOriginalWaffle says:

    After reading this in the Mail yesterday, my husband and I had a long discussion about having my mother in the birthing room. I was astonished at the article’s suggestion that Carole Middleton being there would be an invasion… um, sorry? I think I want my mom there to keep me grounded and feeling safe.

  16. molly says:

    even if the press say she had a natural birth, (which she probably won’t coz she is to posh and LAZY to push, you don’t honestly think anything else other than that will be published do you ????

    It’s all becoming very booooooring, 75% of britain are NOT INTERESTED.

  17. mayamae says:

    Can any of the UK posters answer me this – Is there any way the Queen does not know the gender?

    • molly says:

      don’t suppose she is really bothered, what sex it is, sounds like waity’s mother will be bringing up the baby, definitely not kate or soppy wills, he is just a sperm donor in this circus, nothing else !

      watch this space in 1 year’s time when the baby will be calling kate’s mother “mummy” !!

  18. Flower says:

    Good for her. C sections should really only be used if absolutely necessary for the safety of the mother or baby.

    It has been widely accepted for some time now that the contractions of labour help prepare the baby’s lungs to breathe air and now new research results have proven that during the hours of labour the body produces a chemical that helps the babies lungs to mature more quickly, even if premature.

    Babies born by caesarean section have a higher risk of respiratory distress syndrome than babies born vaginally at the same gestational time while C section babies have more likely hood of developing asthma and lung related illnesses such as bronchitis later in life than those delivered naturally.