Jaimie Alexander in Azzaro Couture at ‘Thor’ LA premiere: trashy or sexy?


Wow, I guess Jaimie Alexander needs some attention, right? Here are some photos of Jaimie (I can’t even start with how she spells her name) at last night’s LA premiere of Thor 2: The Dark World. The dress is Azzaro Couture, and it rivals Gwyneth Paltrow’s now-infamous Antonio Berardi gown at the Iron Man 3 premiere earlier this year. Gwyneth’s gown was so revealing that Gwyneth admitted that she had to shave her Goop-muff. I’m assuming Jaimie had to do the same, because Jesus Christ, I really didn’t need to see her shadowy mons this morning. The girl’s got an amazing body, for sure. But I think this is super-trashy and “look at me, I’m a movie star, pay attention!”

Speaking of her movie star dreams/reality, Jaimie is trying to start a BIG rumor about a future project – apparently, when she was promoting Thor during a panel discussion, she left some hints about possibly being approached to play Wonder Woman in Batman vs. Superman (with Ben Affleck and Henry Cavill). You can read more about it here at Forbes. I think it’s possible that they would want Jaimie… she’s got the look, she’s into stunt work, etc. We’ll see.

I’m also including photos of Kat Dennings in Naeem Khan. I’m meh on her dress.




Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

135 Responses to “Jaimie Alexander in Azzaro Couture at ‘Thor’ LA premiere: trashy or sexy?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Maureen says:

    I don’t even know who she is but GOD that dress is HORRIBLE.

  2. Lucy Goosey says:

    I like it! I think it is sexy and original. I like the print on Kat Dennings but something seems off with the shape.

  3. Hannah says:

    Who would have thought that you can show off your breasts AND legs in a floor-length, high-neck dress?

  4. Dani2 says:

    I was prepared to come here and be open-minded but damn! That is A LOT of skin, I’m sorry but it just reeks of desperation to me, I mean, she is pretty forgettable so I can kinda see why she did it. What is she in besides Thor?

  5. bns says:

    Not trashy at all. People need to stop criticizing women who want to show off their bodies. More power to them.

  6. blue marie says:

    Am I supposed to know who she is? I have no idea. Am I going to have to google her? She has a nice body, I just don’t care to see all of it.

    Kat looks pretty.

  7. Nanz01 says:

    At first glance (at just the front if the dress), I thought she looked amazing. But then I saw her backside, and I just don’t need to see a$$cheek this early in the morning, you know? So yeah, way too revealing. For some reason, I think sheer in just the front would have been fine. Revealing, but fine. As it is, there’s really no need to bother with a dress at all.

  8. lucy says:

    Well, it leaves nothing to the imagination, and she looks uncomfortable and a little embarrassed.

    But it got her some press, where I’m sure nobody knew her name yesterday, so well done….?

  9. MonicaQ says:

    Is she Sif? Because I kinda draw a blank when I look at her.

  10. Diana says:

    Body and face are stunning for Jaimie!!! I would have preferred the back not be so revealing though… I think the vaginal mesh is too much skin for my taste too.

  11. browniecakes says:

    All that for Carlisle Cullen?

  12. Another Ann says:

    Why even bother with the dress? Just go naked and be done with it.

  13. Angel May says:

    Her body is flawless, but this dress makes her look thirsty AF.

  14. Amory says:

    To me, it is a beautiful, architectural dress, but it belongs in a magazine spread, not on a red carpet. For the latter, it could use more cover, especially in the back.

  15. RN says:

    She could wear it to her next OB/GYN appointment and never have to disrobe for the doctor’s examination.

  16. aquarius64 says:

    Too much showing; and it makes her look like a desperate attention seeker. Jaimie’s gorgeous; she didn’t have to go there. Natalie kept it classy on the Thor 2 red carpets. (Why is she not at this one?)

  17. Elle says:

    This is a dress that would only work at the grammys.

  18. elsa says:

    I actually like the dress and the whole look very much! It is rather revealing but I believe she does pull it off. What can i say? I ‘m a european.

  19. jinni says:

    She has such lovely eyes. I love the shape of them and the color is a great contrast with her dark hair. As for the dress, if the cut out had only been in the front than it would’ve been okay to me, but the added exposure in the back is just too much for my taste. But she seems confident and comfortable in it and that’s what really matters.

  20. YummyMummy says:

    Trashy or sexy? Is that even a question? Total trash!! She has a great body and could wear a sexy dress and look great. This is a cheap tacky mess!

  21. GIRLFACE says:

    Ew. Trash. The cut outs need to stop. Please. Designers. Quit it with the awkward cutouts. She looks like Paula Abdul circa 1990 in the worst way. Yuck. I think Kat’s gown is a problematic length but I like the print too.

  22. eliza says:

    Why bother with clothes if you are going to wear that?! Seriously, I am far from a prude and love a sexy dress, but this is Jenna Jameson AVN Awards worthy not movie red carpet material.

    Who is she?

  23. yeahright says:

    Good grief that’s disgusting. She’s absolutely stunning AND she is the type to be able to pull off a dress that shows more skin… but not like THAT. It looks budget and her hair looks like it belongs at a barn wedding.

  24. Bird says:

    Such a desperate attention grab. So trashy!

  25. PHD gossip says:

    For attention seeking starlet behavior lets compare it to Elizabeth Hurley’s 1994 Versace Gown that was very revealing and got Liz a lot of attention. This just attracts negative attention. This is as big a fail as KK’s “couch gown” for the Met Gala.
    Yes, folks, this gown is THAT tasteless!

  26. Sunny says:

    terrible, but still better than every Marchesa dress i´ve ever seen

  27. Crack Fox says:

    I love the dress, it’s very sexy. I think she wears it well, preventing it from look uber trashy despite her vageen showing.

  28. Agnes says:

    I like Kat’s dress. Most of the time she seems dominated by her breasts but this time she looked cute

  29. Julianna says:

    IDGAF she looks sexy as hell.

  30. Side-Eye says:

    I think Jaimie’s dress is really nice except for the back, and she’s extremely pretty, but Kat Dennings bores me to tears.

  31. FW says:

    I Like Jaimie. She’s Sif in both Thor movies. But this dress…errrrrrrrrrr…sexy in a wrong way

  32. Grant says:

    I can’t hate because she’s such a badass in the Thor movies (especially the one coming out Friday)…

  33. Kelly says:

    Attention seeking, sure, but she pulls it off. She’s stunningly beautiful. Flaunt what you’ve got.

    On another note, this post reminds how these two women seemed so smitten with Hiddleston during their press rounds for the first Thor movie, now they’re all barely speaking, what happened?

  34. strah says:

    This is a “dress” not a dress.
    Just be naked if that’s what you want to do. The sheer window dressing seems more silly than sexy.

  35. Reece says:

    Kaiser, a “movie star” is someone recognized by face and/or name. This person qualifies as neither. Seriously I had to google her to realize she’s the girl god in the movie.

    As for the dress: From the front = whatever…From the side WTF?! I don’t wanna see that!

  36. OriginallyBlue says:

    She’s gorgeous and her body is sick. I could do without seeing her butt cheek and part of her crotch, though. If it covered her butt and crotch a bit more, I would like it even more, but I still think she looks sexy.

  37. Janeite says:

    Her hair and makeup are great and she’s a gorgeous woman but there is just no excuse for that dress. It’s utterly obnoxious. I wanted to like Kat Dennings’ dress but there was just something kind of off about it; it looked like it didn’t quite fit properly.

  38. DreamyK says:

    Thanks for shaving ladyland before foisting that dress upon us, Jaimie. Yikes.

  39. nicegirl says:

    I am not a fan of the dress – it leaves nothing to the imagination.

  40. Marianne says:

    Its not leaving much to the imagination. Thats for sure.

  41. Megan says:

    Lol I think she looks smoking hot. Is it over the top? Yea but at least it shook up the red carpet. Natalie’s fashion always bores me and Kat looks like a troll who got tangled in an oriental rug (sorry fangirls) so this is an interesting change for once lol.

    I always liked Jaimie since Kyle XY, she is gorgeous and seems like a sweet girl.

  42. Andrea says:

    This dress reminds me of Gloria Steinem’s famous quote: “I wish we didn’t have to be nude to be noticed.”

    She wanted attention and she got it but there a price. Exploitation . Yes, being in charge of our own bodies is empowering but there is also the reality that women in Hollywood are frequently exploited and judged as sex objects. She’s not fighting that here. She’s giving in to it.

    Not into her.

  43. Sisi says:

    So trashy and that dress is kind of bland. What a horrid look, yikes.

  44. Denise says:

    Is that a serious question? Also, when are people going to learn that the outside of a woman’s pubic area is not the vagina? Last I checked that was on the inside. The dress is bad but I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t be able to see her cervix with a flashlight.

  45. Miss M says:

    Oh Jaimie.. the name of your movie is Thor not p*rn.

    Such a pretty woman, such a trashy dress…

  46. Singtress says:

    We know her name today.
    Dress for success.

    If she is smart (who knows) her dress choice was all about becoming a hot topic on here, CNN, People, US…and all the other places I have seen her today.

    That said… there are a lot of clothes out there that I would wear if I had a killer body like that.
    This is not one of them.

  47. Naomi says:

    Lets remember that Jaime Alexander is a homewrecker. On top of that her boyfriend had a sixteen-year old daughter. Clearly she doesn’t care what image she projects as long as it gets HER attention. Her her, it’s all about her.

  48. Dommy Dearest says:

    Pretty sure Miley has worn even less than this. Oh damnit. Miley has screwed over my shock meter. I’m not even bothered by this.

  49. Bread and Circuses says:

    Jaimie Alexander is one of my unreserved girl-crushes. She is SO pretty.

    But yeah. That dress is very “LOOKIT! LOOKIT! I’M SOOOO NAKED! WHEE!”

  50. Bird says:

    I’d already forgotten her name by the time I read all the comments.

  51. kibbles says:

    The only thing I envy is Kat Denning’s gorgeous skin. She has the kind of voluptuous body I find attractive, but she as well as Christina Hendricks need to hire a stylist who knows how to dress women with big boobs and butt.

    Never heard of Jaimie Alexander so I guess she got the attention she wanted from this dress. I really hate where celebrity culture is headed. These people really have no bounds. The men in the industry obviously encourage and reward these women for their sex and nudity. Celebrity women confuse their monetary rewards and attention for sexual freedom and empowerment.

    They’ve sold their bodies and souls and could care less the ramifications their actions have on the majority of girls and women who aren’t fortunate enough to be highly rewarded when they are victimized and exploited for their body parts.

    Hope this woman fades away like all the ones before her who were the “IT” girl of the moment for being hot, but didn’t have the talent to back up the goods.

  52. Vera says:

    Ugh. Straight up nasty, but I never heard of her before today, so mission accomplished, I suppose.

  53. chloe says:

    Well she has a great body and a very good waxer. As for her I forgot her name before I finished reading all of these posts, wearing a dress like that so early in your career is pretty much showing all directors and producers out there what roles your qualified for, which are any that might have gone to Megan Fox , I hear Michael Bay calling her right now.

  54. M.A.F. says:

    The only thing I wished she would have done is keep the weight on. She is way skinner than a year or too ago. She looked way better at the Thor 1 premiere because she had some weight.

  55. Erm says:

    It is interesting from the front, but the back just makes it look comical and silly. Like a giant censor bar across the butt crack.

  56. I Choose Me says:

    I saw the pic that shows that she’s completely bare under there. Terrific body but I gotta ask did she really need to go there for attention? Then again we’re all here commenting on it so, mission accomplished?

    • Miss M says:

      “Terrific body but I gotta ask did she really need to go there for attention?”

      Yes, she needed it. Who would pay attention to her, someone who barely shows up in the movie, if we saw CHems and TommyannE in a red carpet together? Obviously she wanted to make a SPLASH on the LA premiere because everybody in the industry will know who she is now…

  57. spiderjoe23@gmail.com says:

    I wonder how she feels about that dress today?

  58. Karen81 says:

    Freely concede I am jealous of her butt, you could bounce quarters off that thing. But the dress is shankeous.

    And for those who won’t know, that is who Jennie Garth’s husband, Peter left her for.

  59. Lark says:

    The big rumor is that Jaimie landed the Wonder Woman role and has a supporting part (or one where she is introduced) in the new Batman/Superman film. A couple of the film people have been heavily hinting that the role has been cast for a while now and insinuating it was her. I already disliked the “sheer” trend with visible underwear that everyone was doing last year, so I don’t care for this at all.

  60. aquarius64 says:

    Take a look of this YouTube clip:


    This does not look like a woman who’s confident about her choice of dress in my opinion. She looks like she’s praying the photogs don’t get an OB/GYN view of her and the next day’s headlines are “Thor 2 actress shows her ladybits on the red carpet”.

  61. Stace says:

    She looks good in Thor but I don’t see her as Wonder Woman.

  62. Nanner says:

    Her mother must be SO proud! LOL

  63. skankey says:

    Magical, absolutely erotic, the peek a boo is so hot its untrue.
    All you people slagging her off, reeks of desperation to me.
    Just think about any beach in summer, you see boobs, half boobs, side boobs, loads cleavage.
    You see buttocks with just small piece of string. Where ladies used to have bikinis hipster style, they started to cut them higher, with the net effect of what used to cover all of the pudendum and pubic hair, now only covers the centre part, so all the sides of the private area has to be trimmed.
    This used to be considered all of the vagina, so we see a part of that either side seems to have gone unnoticed and gone main stream. no one bats an eye about this, but when a celeb wears something risqué the world stops, so I say to you all, get a life, retract the claws.
    We are only young and beautiful for a short time, flaunt it as long as you can.