Scarlett Johansson will marry Romain next month in Paris or the Hamptons


Scarlett Johansson has been keeping quiet lately. Like, for the past two months or so, she’s been able to step back in a big way. It’s nice. It’s allowed us to examine other sketchy/fishy couplings, like George Clooney and Amal Alamuddin. But that doesn’t mean that ScarJo’s engagement to Romain Dauriac is any less shady, just that she’s not trying to convince us that this is the grandest love affair in the world or that they’re #initforlife. But shock of all shocks, Scarlett and Romain are going through with the wedding. SOON.

Pregnant Scarlett Johansson is marrying Romain Dauriac in just a few weeks, she revealed at an elegant dinner thrown by Martha Stewart at her East Hampton estate. The glowing actress, who was engaged to French journalist Dauriac in September last year and announced they were expecting a baby in March, was overheard saying at Saturday’s gathering that they are getting married in four weeks.

The August wedding venue is being kept a secret, but the speculation is that Johansson will opt for a very private ceremony in Dauriac’s native Paris, or perhaps in the Hamptons, where the couple has been spending much of the summer. Johansson’s much-anticipated Luc Besson sci-fi movie “Lucy” opens on Friday, so the 29-year-old actress will be busy promoting the flick before the wedding and the imminent birth of their first child.

The happy couple slipped into Stewart’s party, and sat across from the domestic doyenne for the seated dinner on her porch, whipped up by her private chef. It was Stewart’s first party at the house in 20 years, and marked the launch of Dom Pérignon’s P2-1998, a vintage that retails for, gulp, $400 a bottle.

[From Page Six]

I can’t help but think of Blake Lively. It’s because of the mention of Martha Stewart – Blake gushed about Martha in her Vogue interview and Martha even gave some quotes to Vogue about Blake. And now ScarJo is hanging out with Martha in the Hamptons? Maybe Martha will help organize Scarlett’s wedding, just like Blake’s. How does it always come back to Ryan Reynolds? It’s so weird. Anyway, if Scarlett and Romain are really going to get married next month… good for them, I guess. Do I have to care that much? I doubt it will last more than a couple of years anyway. She just wants to marry someone French and live in Paris for a short time, because that’s part of the fantasy she’s created for herself. JMO.



Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

72 Responses to “Scarlett Johansson will marry Romain next month in Paris or the Hamptons”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Allie says:

    I do not understand her appeal at all.

  2. Victoria1 says:

    All I get from this story is, I want her boobs. Pregancy or not, they always look fabulous.

  3. Tiffany27 says:

    I have heard MANY stories of her being rude and I just can’t see this marriage lasting more than 3 years. But, good luck to the baby, I want to know the name.

  4. GlimmerBunny says:

    She’s gorgeous, a good actress and seems cool but GOD HER TATTOOS ARE UGLY! I usually love tattoos but hers are just awful.

  5. Frida_K says:

    All his name needs is an “e” on the end and then he can be “Romaine” like the lettuce.

    Maybe they’ll name the child Iceberg or, assuming they’re feeling fancy, Arugula.

  6. don't kill me i'm french says:

    They search another home in Swiss because she thinks the tax is expensive in France

  7. danielle says:

    She looks pretty happy with this guy. Of course, she looked happy with Penn too. Oddly, she looked miserable when she was married to Reynolds, not that we saw them together much.

  8. Nessa says:

    Everything about this chick is overrated. That’s all I got.

  9. epiphany says:

    Not a big ScarJo fan – much like Allie, I don’t understand her appeal – lots of actresses have big breasts – but this guy seems like trouble. I hope she knows what she’s doing, because from this angle, it looks like a huge mistake.

  10. pnichols says:

    Martha rules! not a bad hook up

  11. Liz says:

    She was crazy good in Under the skin.

    • don't kill me i'm french says:

      I’m jealous .I wanted to see this movie but it’s not released in my aera

    • Sunny says:

      I know! I didn’t like her as an actress for the longest time. I felt she projected a certain coldness, emotionally distant, pseudo intellectual vibe on screen but lately she has been changing my mind.

      Her voice work was terrific in Her. She is fantastic in Under the Skin and I will even say, I thought her portrayal of Black Window was one of the unexpected surprises of Captain America 2.

      I have always felt she is the kind of woman who hates being judged solely on her looks and tries extra hard to appear smart to show she is more than her face and boobs. That being said, she never sounds all that intelligent in interviews.

      No real opinion on her wedding aside from I think she will look fantastic.

      • Liz says:

        I agree on her voice work In Her was very, very good and I personally didn’t love that film. I’m going to see Lucy when it’s released in the UK because I love that it’s a female led action film and because of Scarlett’s recent run of films had shown that she can make some great choices

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I haven’t seen everything that she has been in, but I think she is a very good actress.

        I do agree that it seems she is the kind of woman who hates being underestimated intellectually because of her looks, so it affects how she comes across in interviews. Can’t say as I blame her for that, though.

  12. Wallamalooo says:

    Why is it sketchy? Have I missed something?

  13. Candy Love says:

    Does anyone know why Scarlett isen’t promoting “Lucy” ? The only promotion she did is for “Avengers” that cones out in 2015 or 2016. It just seems odd that the movie comes out next week and there has been no promotion for this movie from anyone. Dose the studio consider it a flop already and don’t want to put anymore money into it?

  14. ClaireB says:

    @ Liz : Yep, she definitely was (and it’s great that such an unusual film have the career that it’s having) . And in other films. She’s not overrated.

  15. Mean Hannah says:

    If it’s an either or, then I’d say definitely Paris. She isn’t pregnant & engaged to a French guy to have a wedding in the Hamptons. Though I’m surprised that they are even spending any time there…it doesn’t seen like her scene. Didn’t she have some deal with Dom Perignon? Or was it another booze company?

  16. Jana says:

    It’s been suggested that her due date is in August so I don’t know how much I believe this story.

  17. JH says:

    He’s cute. That is all I’ve got.

  18. truthful says:

    All I know is that she ruined my love affair w/her with some of those janky interviews she did, its not the same for us now, LOL

    In my previous life, I WAS Martha Stewart, I was very obsessed w/fresh flowers weekly, making homemade pasta, and collecting chic coasters and cloth napkins.

    my friends still tease me about it, I am not ashamed but jealous of those hanging w/Martha and sipping Dom and cold vodka from the freezer.

  19. Algernon says:

    God she looked gorgeous in that black dress.

  20. lucy2 says:

    I’ve liked her in a lot of her roles, and from the commercials, she looks really pretty and kick ass in Lucy. I don’t get a great impression of her personality from a few of those recent interviews, but who knows.

  21. aqua says:

    Is their something in the water or perhaps something in the air? because their certainly seems to be a lot of celebrity weddings this year.

  22. Kate2 says:

    I think she has her really pretty moments and then not so great. I thought she looked fabulous in Iron Man II, but I didn’t like her hair cut in The Avengers. I wish they had left it long. I hated the still of her the other day for Age of Ultron. She was hot in Don Juan Demarco, and she was great acting-wise in it too.

    Overall, I guess I like her. I have seen some interviews with her that I thought were really funny and she has a very quick wit. But I’ve seen others where she seemed kinda bitchy and cold. Her cast mates seem to love her though, the Avengers guys rave. But they’re men, and they could be boobnitized, so who knows. I’ve seen plenty of bitchy girls with guys crawling all over them and think they’re great because they’re hot. So who knows. But I’m coming down on the side of “like” until she does something really egregious.

    And like any actor, she has some stinkers in her past, but she also has some excellent performances IMHO.

  23. aquarius64 says:

    Everyone is clamoring for Marvel Studios to do a Black Widow movie, but Scar Jo has yet to prove she can open a movie at #1 on her name alone. “Lucy” is the acid test; the character is the blond Natasha Romanoff in some sequences. If Lucy tanks, or doesn’t really rake in the money as expected for all Marvel movies now, that project is going to be shelved. I think Emily Blunt would have ruled as the Widow.

  24. Chris says:

    The Hamptons or Paris? Not exactly the people’s actress is she?

  25. Bianca says:

    I really liked her in Match Point and Lost in translation.

    I live in NYC, so I went with a friend for her birthday to see Johansson perform on stage and she was really good.

    I very much enjoyed her performance.

    I think she is very attractive woman and I wish her well.

    I have no problem with her supporting Woody Allen, obviously she has spent some time with him while filming 3 different movies and I have not.

    So what right do I have to judge for supporting Woody?

  26. LAK says:

    I like that she’s been so low key with this one, the pregnancy and hopefully the wedding.