Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
May 9
'07
When Bad Stylists Happen to Good People

I’ve just looked on the Daily Mail website, and it looks like Cate Blanchett is back to looking like her normally glam self. The pictures of her looking like Marc Anthony’s long lost Aussie sister that appeared of her at the gala for New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York were thankfully just a result of bad lighting, bad make-up, and a bad dress choice.

Cate is whippet thin and I still think a trip to Pizza Hut is still in order, but at least the black dress that she wore to “Time Magazine’s 100 Most Influential People In The World” party covers up her collarbone and her shoulders, giving her a slim look without making her look like she’s the Crypt Keeper’s stunt double. The gold dress in the Met gala picture is completely wrong for her — it would look better on a curvier body type with a bit of a tan, in my opinion. If she has indeed lost the weight for a film role, then let my eyes water after I’ve seen the movie knowing her painfully thin collarbone is the result of Cate being really committed to her craft, as opposed to committed to not eating Kraft. Seriously, I reckon I can juice an orange if I put it on those bones jutting out of her shoulders.

In the Met Gala picture, Cate’s face looks severe with her hair pulled back, and her make-up makes her look ghostly pale, emphasising the cheekbones resulting from her weight loss. In the Time party pics, you can see she is using much rosier colors on her cheeks to make her face look warm, not gaunt.

I’m glad to see Cate is back to looking like a million dollars. If I were her, I would really consider firing the stylist who shamed her at the Met shindig. Dawn of the Dead is never a good look to go for.

Written by Jessie

Posted in Photos

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • Gabby: wHAT A pIcTUrE….HoT!!!!…. .Would Love 2 get a “Blood-Fusion” going with...
  • conner: conner 9, 8) happy birthday miley have a wonderful day :wink: love your show :P your my favourite singer...
  • wise_adviser: She is saying she will leave acting because every time she does a movie and needs to promote it she...
  • Rosebudd: Not related, but, wondering if anyone knows where the ex[ression “take him to the cleaners”...
  • brianne: I agree with many others here, he’s 22! ofcourse he’s not committing to anybody, and why should...
  • Christina X: Please excuse me as someone who’s been lead on and rejected a countless amount of times in her...
  • sweetzy: very surprising! If it’s true Alhamdulilah.. just hope he’s not playing around just because of...
  • Kaiser: Thanks, Bodhi. Would you like to share a plain green salad with me (NO CROUTONS)? :lol:
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.