People: Sandra Bullock has dated Bryan Randall since June, they don’t live together

People Magazine has some exclusive photos of Sandra Bullock looking blissfully happy with her new man, photographer Bryan Randall. (You can see a preview above and People has more photos on the video embedded on their site.) They also report that Sandra and Bryan have been together since Bryan photographed Sandra’s son, Louis, for his graduation photo in June. This is a change from the previous story, originally reported by Jezebel, that Bryan met Sandra at Louis’s birthday party, which was in January. It’s possible Jezebel’s insider was mistaken about the timing, or it could be that Sandra’s people are fudging the timing. There were many reports that Bryan was dating a 23 year-old named Paris St. John up until this summer. In fact St. John’s mother even confirmed the report, on the record, to In Touch and Us Magazine. (She only had nice things to say about her daughter’s relationship with Bryan and gushed about what a great guy he was.)

Regardless here’s some of People’s report about this relationship:

The Oscar winner, 51, and the model-photographer, 49, made headlines when they were first spotted together earlier this summer, and despite rumors, a source tells PEOPLE that they are not living together or engaged. The two are simply enjoying getting to know each other and have been “happily dating” since June.

“They started dating after Bryan photographed [Bullock’s son] Louis for his graduation,” adds the source in this week’s issue.

Randall is perfectly fine with being the number two man in Bullock’s life. The father of a daughter, he “respects that her main priority is Louis; he’s a parent himself. There is no co-parenting involved,” says the source.

There has been no comment regarding rumors that Bullock has adopted again.

[From People]

I like that Sandra’s team is shutting down the stories about this guy helping with her son and living with her. They want to make it seem casual despite the fact that he had a whole PR rollout a month ago. I really want to know about Sandra’s baby. Did she adopt a girl? It seems like she must have, or else why isn’t she denying those reports? If so, is she going to premiere the baby at some point, similar to how she showed Louis in a photospread for People? If she does that, she’ll definitely get the cover. I mean Blake Shelton covers this week’s issue, you know?

2015 Toronto International Film Festival - 'Our Brand is Crisis' Premiere

2015 Toronto International Film Festival - Day 2

40th TIFF - 'Our Brand Is Crisis' - Press Conference

photo credit: WENN.com and FameFlynet

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “People: Sandra Bullock has dated Bryan Randall since June, they don’t live together”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. aims says:

    I love Sandra but her taste in men suck. My douchbag radar is pinging with this dude.

    • the_blonde_one says:

      yup, just the fact that *I* find him incredibly sexy pretty much means he is a major douche. Nothing wrong with only being attracted to douches but for the love of dog, woman, KNOW that about yourself and only ‘hit it and quit it’.

  2. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I’m sort of torn. She looks so happy. But silent alarm bells are going off on him. Does he prefer 23 years olds unless he can date someone famous and rich? Or does he see how great she is? I just hope he doesn’t break her heart.

    • Esmom says:

      I had the same thoughts. The cynic in me says he met her and grabbed his chance to trade up on the celeb ladder. She does look really good, though. Heartbreak is always a risk in any relationship, I guess.

  3. Suze says:

    I hope it turns out well.

    But he raises every red flag I’ve ever seen.

  4. InvaderTak says:

    This old school tabloid PR is kinda hilarious. Just, like, it’s so vintage you guise.

  5. Andrea 1* says:

    Sandra please stop with the botox…..you look so harsh

    • jolene says:

      yeah I’m seeing that too — in this header photo and on the cover of the new Glamour issue

    • meme says:

      I agree. She’s veering into Michael Jackson territory.

    • kibbles says:

      She used to be so naturally and down-to-earth pretty. She never needed to wear a lot of makeup nor did the glam look fit her. Unfortunately, as she has gotten older is veering in that direction along with botox and it doesn’t look good at all. Ageing sucks but you’d think these women would realize that you can’t hide your age regardless of the amount of Botox and fillers you use on your face. And less is more when it comes to makeup.

  6. carol says:

    I think she looks phenomenal.

    • Really says:

      The difference between the first and second photo- in the Same dress- is incredible. She looks 20 years older in the second photo, and has arm pit wrinkles. What a difference lighting and PS make. Same as with recent photos of Courtney Cox.

  7. Maya says:

    Of course she is fudging the dates – we cannot have one of America’s sweethearts to be exposed as home wreckers now, can we?

    Just like she who shall not be named difinetely ruined a longterm relationship and then fudged the dates by 6 months or so, Sandra and her team will without a doubt do the same.

    Plus she is gunning for that second Oscar nomination and is not going to let anything stand in her way.

    • Jayna says:

      The girl’s mother said her daughter broke up with him, wasn’t ready to settle down and have a family, and praised him as a great guy. You can’t make something it’s not. And a homewrecker? They were dating like two and a half years, not married, and it wound down. It happens. Everyone has dated someone for several years and it doesn’t lead to marriage. Enough with this homewrecker word used so loosely.

  8. Colette says:

    I won’t believe this baby story until she confirms it.This is not the first time tabloids have claimed she has adopted a child.I find it odd that someone can see her carrying a baby yet not take a picture in 2015.If she does have a baby,Congrats.
    Of course they will fudge the numbers on when they started dating.Also enough with the nonsense of how “sexy”,”handsome”,”hot”,”gorgeous” this guy is.He is nice looking but far from gorgeous IMO.

  9. Cinderella says:

    I love Sandra, but I don’t understand her.

  10. Jen says:

    I love that dress!

  11. Junior says:

    Has Sandra ever revealed so much information regarding her boyfriends before? What gives? Oscar? When does her movie open by the way?

  12. Manjit says:

    Her team don’t seem to be fudging any dates to me. The article doesn’t say that they met when he took her son’s photo, just that they started dating shortly after he took her son’s photo.

  13. Crumpet says:

    Now that she is older, I don’t care for the bangs on her so much. Too harsh. She needs a soft side sweep IMO. And the bolder lipstick colors – again, they look too harsh. She looks better in muted, softer colors I think.

  14. taxi says:

    Bangs are too long & wildly uneven clip-ins or extensions just look messy. Time for a sophisticated adult hair-do.