Leonardo DiCaprio is ‘well positioned’ to finally win an Oscar for ‘The Revenant’

Earlier this week, Leonardo DiCaprio was in New York for an advanced industry screening of The Revenant. I’m sure the film will be blown away at the box office by Star Wars: The Force Awakens, but it’s not about box office for Leo… this time. It’s about getting Leo that Oscar gold. He’s been super-serious for months, he’s been wearing his Serious Oscar Face and making all of the right moves to claim that Oscar. He can almost taste it! At the screening, Leo spoke to the crowd about the unconventional experience making The Revenant:

“This is a very linear, straightforward, brilliantly simplistic screenplay… we wanted to find the poetry in between that. It was about us immersing ourselves in nature and putting ourselves as close as we could to the struggle of these people and finding the thru line in that process. It’s all a beautiful blur to me… You have to rehearse meticulously and then it’s a mad, intense scramble to capture this magic light, this precious hour and a half…It became very much like an un-humorous Saturday Night Live situation. This is the most difficult film, I think, that any of us have ever done.”

[From The Daily Mail]

We’re going to keep hearing variations on that. Leo struggled with this one. It was a really difficult shoot, one of the most difficult in the history of filmmaking. So surely Leo deserves something, right? Well, as it turns out, Leo is now the favorite for the Best Actor Oscar. Vulture did a rundown of The Revenant’s Oscar chances, which you can read here. Here’s the Leo section:

Let’s start with the big one, Best Actor. Four-time acting nominee Leonardo DiCaprio has famously never taken home the gold, and it’s been presumed all year that The Revenant, where he plays out-for-revenge fur trapper Hugh Glass, will give him his best shot at an Oscar. Having seen the film, I’m inclined to agree, not just because DiCaprio gives his all to the role, but in large part because he doesn’t have overwhelming competition this year. (DiCaprio’s two strongest rivals may be former co-stars Matt Damon and Johnny Depp, neither of whom feels like a front-runner just yet.)

This is more of a physical performance than a verbal one — after his throat is slashed by a bear and he’s left for dead by his comrades, it’s not like Glass is capable of much conversation, anyway — and DiCaprio fully commits to it, delivering a spittle-speckled, blood-soaked revenge turn that successfully exterminates every last vestige of his teen-dream twinkdom. The making of the movie in subzero conditions was nearly as arduous as it looks, and Oscar voters favor actors who’ve been put through their paces. Taken in concert with DiCaprio’s “he’s due” narrative — and the fact that the actor has now entered his 40s, a sweet spot for men to receive Academy recognition — he’s well positioned to finally win.

[From Vulture]

Vulture also makes a case for Tom Hardy to get a Best Supporting Actor nomination, calling his chatty, wily villain “weirdly delightful” but saying that Idris Elba might have the villain-role nomination locked down already. Why not two villain roles though? I think if Leo is a shoo-in for an Oscar nomination, Tom Hardy should be too! Maybe that’s just because I want to see The Bloke at the Oscars. Anyway… is there any way Leo can lose? Probably. It will depend on how much Matt Damon turns on the charm. I think Michael Fassbender, while buzz-y, won’t engage in a campaign, so he might get nominated and that will be as far as it goes. As for Johnny Depp… if he did a real campaign, that would be very interesting. Hm. Plus, don’t forget Michael Keaton for Spotlight! The Best Actor race is pretty exciting this year.

Photos courtesy of Getty.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

118 Responses to “Leonardo DiCaprio is ‘well positioned’ to finally win an Oscar for ‘The Revenant’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. COSquared says:

    Ugh. All that pretentiousness of being ‘meticulous’ makes me gag.

  2. minx says:

    Depp deserves some love, but he won’t campaign for it, so, that’s that.

    • jinni says:

      I think he is campaigning for the nomination, but you are right in not thinking that he’ll campaign for the win. I think a nom is all he really wants.

      Also, I think if Leo wins it would be kind of a sad win only because the narrative for this award season seems to be that most of the actors in the running really don’t seem to be much competition in regards to the roles they played or they don’t want to campaign. So, Leo looks to be the winner almost by default. That doesn’t really feel like a win to me.

    • kennedy says:

      Eh. I don’t know if he “deserves” love – he’s pretty cozy right now, makes millions, continues an output of 10 horrible films to every 1 decent-to-ok film. He was quite good in Black Mass but the prosthetics and the jarringly fake contacts were way too distracting to really give room for his performance. I think without all of the extra “stuff,” I could have taken him more seriously because he had the accent down and he was quite menacing. I don’t know what the makeup/special effects budget was but dang, they did a horrendous job with him.

      I’m quite alright with Leo winning. I still think his 3 best performances after Gilbert Grape are Revolutionary Road (not nominated for), Shutter Island (not nominated for) and The Departed (also not nominated for). Leo is a terrific actor who makes smart choices. I love his collaboration with Scorsese and he’s the rare A-lister who can actually make smart, adult films happen that aren’t franchise and/or special-effects dependent. I don’t really get all the hate for him around here. He’s never come across as desperate for an Oscar – it’s much more about the media making him out to be Oscar hungry. I actually believe that he cares way more about producing great work than a statue. If Leo wins – it won’t be a sad win or an “overdue” win (like Kate Winslet who should have won for her previous 3 – 4 noms). The Revenant looks like the kind of film any actor who produces great work would win for – it’s all mental and physical. It’s not dialogue driven which makes it exceptionally hard… or at least I would imagine. If it happens, I don’t see it as a default win. I actually see that more for Depp who gave a good performance in a very average film. Based on early reviews of The Revenant – it sounds polarizing but in a good way. Reminds me of early reviews for The Tree of Life which has gone on to earn a reputation as one of the best films of the last decade or so (personally, it’s a top 10 film for me).

      Not entirely related, but I’m stoked for the adaptation of The Devil in the White City!

      • Kitty says:

        Well, he actually does deserve love for his performance in Black Mass.

        I think you’re quite exaggerating about him “continuing an output of 10 horrible films to every 1 decent-to-ok film.” Firstly, nobody ever sets out to make a ‘horrible’ film, there’s a lot of reasons why a project that sounded good on paper can go completely wrong.

        Secondly, he’s only had a few ‘horrible’ films recently, and he’s actually had small roles in good films like Into the Woods and Lucky Them before Black Mass, which is an excellent movie.

        Depp’s goods far outweigh the bads.

  3. Hazel says:

    I think the Best Actor category will be interesting this year with possible nominees: Leonardo diCaprio, Matt Damon, Michael Fassbender, Eddie Redmayne, Johnny Depp, Tom Hanks and Will Smith.

    A lot of the names there are Hollywood veterans with lots of insider support and contacts. Let the Games begin.

  4. LB says:

    I think Leo’s going to win for a few reasons. One is he may actually deserve it. I haven’t seen anything other than the Martian to compare, which is why I said “may”. But I did get to see a screening of The Revenant last week. It’s very, very good. You can see all the hard work everyone put into this (Chivo’s got it in the bag btw – triple win in a row). Hardy’s stellar and almost steals it (he will get nominated). Leo doesn’t have very much dialogue (just noticed the article mentioned it as well) but he’s in almost every scene so it’s all relies on his face and actions. He does a truly amazing job. I like him fine usually but I think he out-did himself here.

    Two is what you said – there’s really no one else. You’ve discussed all the other major people and what issues lie there, except one – Eddie Redmayne, who as we’ve seen is super charming and connected enough to win. He’s also always willing to campaign and play the game. I think his problem is it’s too soon for him to win again. He’s no Tom Hanks – the last person to pull off Best Actor two years in a row.

    Three – this is a movie the Academy will eat up. Difficult shoot, check. Stories of the difficult shoot everywhere, check. Actors talking about difficult shoot, check. Brilliant visuals, check. Pretty good story, check. Man-pain, check. White man-pain, check.

    Four – he’s due.

    Leo’s going to win, in my opinion.

    • Liv says:

      Crazy. I thought that he won’t win for the next 10 years…unless he gets his private life together. But it seems more and more that there won’t be much competition this year. It’s early on, so there’s still the possibilty that someone else gains momentum, but right now he’s the only one campaigning and like you stated there are several points speaking in his favor.

    • Happy21 says:

      I cannot wait to see this movie. Not because of Leo or Hardy (although they do make it very appealing) but just because of the sheer magnitude of the sets and the filming and the scenery, etc.

      I think that I’ll be going the day it comes out where I live (it won’t be Christmas because the theaters here aren’t open on Christmas)!

    • pancake bacon says:

      Is he really “due”? What role has he really broken through and gave that performance where he truly deserved the Oscar? Gilbert Grape is the closest, but since then. I haven’t seen any to really speak off.

      If we go by “due” — let’s try Glenn Close (nominated five times!) or Kenneth Branagh (nominated five times — in five different categories to boot!) There are the never-nominateds that have given wonderful performances that deserve recognition like Donald Sutherland and Alan Rickman.

      I think Leo gets it this year because he found the “thirstiest” role out there, having to endure eating raw animal flesh and all. Okay, Leo…

      • tracking says:

        I agree with you, pancake bacon. I can’t think of a truly memorable role of his since Gilbert Grape.

  5. Arlene says:

    Have you seen the trailer? He’s on fake horse. A massive budget and they use a fake horse. Astounding.

    1:46 fake horse.

  6. Naya says:

    If the Academy feels like 2016 is the year to reward a solid performer who has previously been snubbed, it wont be Leo. It wIll either be Johnny Depp or Michael Keaton. I think they will also be aware that this may be the last opportunity they get to dispense with Depp, since he’ll probably return to his Tim Burton ways after this. Come back again next year Leo.

    • Don Juan says:

      Agreed. I really hope Johnny wins one day, if not this time.

    • Nic919 says:

      I have seen Spotlight and if there is a male lead performance it is Mark Ruffalo. Keaton would be supporting if anything. Spotlight is more of an ensemble film, with maybe Rachel McAdams having a chance at a nominations in addition to Ruffalo.

      What I dislike is the talk that a great performance like Fassbender’s gets overlooked simply because of campaigning. It should be about the performance, not the campaign.

  7. nana says:

    He’ll win because the competion is so weak and Hollywood is behind him.

  8. Locke Lamora says:

    He is ten times more thirsty than Anne Hathaway, yet she got a huge backlash, and people actually root for him. Isn’t that nice?

    • The Original Mia says:

      You’re absolutely right. The thirst is real strong with Leo.

    • Don Juan says:

      True, but Hathaway was dumb for publicly campaigning way too hard when the category was weak and she was gonna win by default.

    • jinni says:

      I think it’s because he’s lost so many times to the point he’s become a meme.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        But there are other actors nominated as many times without an award and some nominated even more. He has a way to go before he matches Peter O’Toole.

      • jinni says:

        @Lilacflowers: You are right that others have lost more times than he has, but I still think the reason some are rooting for him unlike Anne is because he’s kind of become a joke in regards to losing unlike those other actors.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      Exactly

    • angelinaem says:

      He is campaigning hard but he wasn’t public about it like Hathaway or Portman were. There is a difference.

      • Josephine says:

        I think the difference is that she campaigned by crying and giggling. Yes, Hollywood is 100% harder on women, and that’s unforgivable, but that particular woman did way too darn much crying and giggling. I think she’s just an awkward person, but she may also just have a lousy personality? Kinda hard to tell. Men have it easier because less is expected of them.

        I get that so many people seem to dislike Leo, and I frankly don’t follow his personal reputation, but I read that his on-set reputation is as a super hard worker. I like about every other movie he is in (I thought he was good enough in The Departed to win, he was wonderful in Inception, and I will forever love him for What’s Eating Gilbert Grape – he was heartbreaking). As far as his acting, I think he is as worthy as most out there. Not every time, but certainly some of the time.

      • Mariy says:

        @ Josephine.
        She campaigned in a very pathetic manner. She was neither humble nor civil about it. Atleast Leo doesn’t make a fool of himself whenever he is close to the gold.
        I like him as an actor too. I don’t get why people bash him for dating models and his lifestyle. I have also heard he is very professional when it comes to his work.

      • Eleonor says:

        Well Leo is at his fourth nomination…

      • Bridget says:

        How on earth was Anne Hathaway uncivil?

        Yeah, she was kind of annoying, but isn’t it kind of a requirement that if you want to win an award for being the best of the year, you have to convince people that you were the best? Where does humility come in there? And why should she be obligated to be humble? Because she’s a woman? Because she doesn’t just have to be good, she also has to be likeable?

    • Aren says:

      I haven’t read or seen any interviews where he says he looks like his lesbian sister, or accepting an award by correcting people for spelling his name incorrectly, or flashing his man-bits by not wearing any underwear.
      So no, I don’t think he’s the same. Besides, he is a great actor who has been in many big films.

      • nana says:

        The sexist bullshit you are throwing at Anne is so transparent.
        DiCaprio has never been the best when competing at the Oscars, that’s why he never won.
        This year is weak for Lead Actors and the others like Fassbender won’t really campaign so he’ll win.

      • Mariy says:

        He also didn’t get a random woman knocked up and pretended to be a happy parent like Natalie Portman did too. Portman getting knocked up by some bozo and playing the mommy card was a disgusting tactic .

      • Mariy says:

        @ nana
        How is Aren being sexist? AnnE did do all of those things he/she mentioned and it was utterly pathetic and embarrassing to watch.

      • Zombie Shortcake says:

        Anne reportedly sent a poached egg and English muffin back to the MGM Studio Restaurant kitchen 3 TIMES because they weren’t to her liking; I don’t think it was humanly possible for her to lead a campaign other than the one she did.

      • Bridget says:

        Um, you realize that’s now Natalie Portman ‘ husband?

        Also, it’s craft service’s job to bring food correctly. Anne was perfectly within her right to send food back if it wasn’t up to her standard.

      • gibby says:

        lol I forgot about the name thing.

        AnnE Hathaway

    • Isabelle says:

      IMO, know its not a popular opinion, don’t see how most people think he is this awesome great actor. He is OK but not great. He is Leo acting like Leo. He rarely disappears in roles except for Gilbert Grape? See Leo above the person he is betraying. Tom Hardy is also in the movie & is a true chameleon. You don’t even realize its him until days, weeks later or until the credits roll. To me that is good acting, when you don’t see the actor but see the character. Lee doesn’t pull it off well. Depp owned that disappearing act in Black Mass even if he annoys me, he owned that role.

      • Minxx says:

        Amen! Totally agree with your comment, including what you said about Hardy and Depp.

      • Manjit says:

        I couldn’t agree more. The only film I’ve ever seen him in where I was impressed with his acting was Revolutionary Road. Usually, I just don’t believe his characterisations.

      • Eden75 says:

        I remember when I saw Gilbert Grape. I had no idea who Leo was and thought it was a great role by a person with disabilities. Seriously, I thought it wasn’t acting (shhhhhh, I know, I know). When I saw him in the Basketball Diaries I almost fell off my chair. Of all of his movies, Gilbert Grape was by far the best and I think that he deserved to win for that, hands down. The rest of his nominations? No, I think that he didn’t deserve those but he got ripped off for Gilbert Grape. I’m no Leo fan but that still pi**es me off to this day.

      • pancake bacon says:

        This is my stance too. Leo’s heavy style and hard, furrowed face doesn’t result in a wonderful performance for me. He’s trying very hard, but there’s no transcendence.

      • Rose says:

        Tom Hardy is definitely a chameleon! Jeez i hardly recognized him in the trailer of the Revenant. I do hope he will be nominated, the man deserves it!

    • milla says:

      Simply, Leo is far superior actor. Loved him in Basketball diaries and What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. But, I for one do not believe in awards. It is amusing, but it makes no sense.

    • Pondering thoughts says:

      Where do you see Leo’s strong thirst? He just campaigns for his movie as does every actor for their respective movie. I didn’t seem him do any sleazy-slimey moves which would indicate extraordinary campaigning. ???

    • Nic919 says:

      Anne Hathaway made the mistake of being a woman and being amibitious about wanting success and recognition in her career. Just look at how Alicia Vikander gets crapped on for thinking her performances this year would be part of Oscar talk. Her performance in Danish Girl does merit it, but she dared have confidence in herself.

      Leo won’t be punished for aggressively campaigning because he is one of the boys.

      • Josephine says:

        But I think she hid her ambition behind a fake “ah, shucks attitude” and that was more the mistake. Not just her, but too many women put on the false modesty thing. I just remember her looking down, batting her eyelashes, giggling, and I just kept thinking, “look up, woman, own it – don’t look like some awkward school girl fishing for a compliment.” Watching her talk about the movie and then watching any of her co-workers — no comparison. Maybe she really is shy. She’s always struck me as awkward. It’s so hard to know.

  9. Minxx says:

    I’m so tired of Leo’s Serious Oscar Face. Give him the Oscar already, get it over with.

  10. angelinaem says:

    Leo won’t get it. Its Johnny Depps year. The Rervent does not have outstanding reviews like Black Mass did either. I have heard terrible horror stories about a man dying and the director making everyone work in extremely cold weather too. if anything, the Revrent is bad PR for Leo co.

    • Bee says:

      You serious? Black Mass didn’t get amazing reviews and underperformed at box office. Depp, if he’s nominated, will be his film’s only nomination.

      • Mariy says:

        It has 74% on RT. How is that bad? The box office wasn’t too bad either. I think you have Black Mass mistaken for By the Sea.

      • Kitty says:

        Well, it got generally good reviews at least. Depp got raves and some of the best reviews of his career, that’s what matters if we are talking Oscar chances for him.

        The movie actually did better than expected at the box office. A $22 million opening is pretty good for an R rated gangster film. And I think it will get a nomination for makeup.

      • Isabelle says:

        Depp actually got great reviews the writing and directing garnered the “bad” reviews at 74%, which isn’t bad.

      • Candice says:

        More worse than by the sea is his own movie last year trancadece 19%and this year joke mortecardre excuse my spelling12% etc. I must say JD is as trusty as LD or even worse. He needs it baad very bad IMO. First to get aturn around from his recent fails that started to take over his box office even with black mass itself its not exactly considered a hit . Also he needs it to sell his make up roles for coming years etc.. .
        Personal life wise both same one womanizing? the other midlife crisis… Work wise I didn’t see neither of the movies so as of now so I can’t say.

      • Lineuar says:

        @ Candice
        Transenece came out in 2014 and it was not directed, produced or written by Depp like By the Sea was. Also, he is not gunning for an Oscar for Motrdecai either( Again, did Depp produce, write or direct the film like Jolie did for By the Sea?)
        So in that case, By the Sea is way worse since it has a rating for 26% on RT and nothing about it was well received. It got bad reviews for acting, directing and writing. All of which was is on Jolie. Sorry but Black Mass has a rating on 74% on RT and it got pretty good reviews too. Depp’s performance was highly praise and it Oscar worthy unlike the performances in By the Sea.
        How is Depp desperate? Please tell me. He isn’t like AJ or BP who trot out their kids, charity work,every detail personal life every time its awards season. Depp is pretty private compared to those 2.
        His failure aren’t anywhere near as bad as Jolie’s are. Sorry to break it to you.

    • chelsea says:

      Black Mass got tepid reviews, and deserved them. The Revenant hasn’t even been released yet.

      • Zayn says:

        No. Black Mass got good reviews, and deserved them. A 74% score based on 223 reviews means that the movie is well-liked by the majority of the critics.

  11. lucy2 says:

    I actually think the race is pretty dull this year. I don’t have interest in any of the films these guys are in.
    Leo’s a talented actor, but the movie doesn’t look like something I’d want to watch.

  12. Amy says:

    All of the actors in Spotlight are going supporting so Keaton will be the frontrunner there.

  13. kri says:

    GO BLOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!! I want to see him bring one of his pups all done up in a tux.

    • antipodean says:

      Agreed, I’m on the Bloke train come hell or high water. That, or anybody else who is not pie-face DiCaprio, can’t act his way out of a wet paper bag, entitled ar*ehole. Did I mention I can’t abide him. Blokes forever!

  14. Minxx says:

    I’d LOVE to see Leo’s face if Keaton wins. That would be epic.

  15. Kat Matz says:

    What about Eddy Raymane in “The Dutch Girl”? Not out yet, but getting a lot of buzz for his performance.

  16. Emily says:

    All I want is for Leo to never win an Oscar. Schadenfreude ist die schonste freude. >:D

  17. babs says:

    He truly is one of the great actors. I remember seeing him in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape – amazing performance. My other fave is Ed Norton – so good.

    • Minxx says:

      I agree – he should have gotten an Oscar for that role for sure. But generally he cannot disappear into a role and I consider that to be a big failing when it comes to acting. Same with Damon though I like him much more than Leo. Both big stars, not such great actors.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      I agree that WEGG was DiCaprio’s best performance but the idea that I keep seeing many people putting forth – that he deserved an Oscar for that, well, just no. The Oscar IS a competition and the award goes to the performance the AMPAS voters think was the best out of the nominees. To repeatedly say DiCaprio deserved the Oscar that year for that performance operates in a vacuumignores that there were four other nominated performances that year and DiCaprio was not viewed as the person who was robbed – that title went to Ralph Fiennes. Tommy Lee Jones won for his performance in The Fugitive – a role that dominated that film and yes, arguably he deserved it. Ralph Fiennes was nominated for his performance in Schindler’s List and many felt he deserved it over Jones. Pete Postlewaithe’s performance in In The Name of the Father was also worthy. And John Malkovich’s powerful, frightening performance in In the Line of Fire as an assassin left far more of an impression on me than any of the others, including DiCaprio.

      • Eden75 says:

        I would have been much less irritated if Fiennes had won that year over Leo. I love Tommy Lee Jones but Fiennes and Leo’s performances were miles ahead of his in the Fugitive.

    • Anna says:

      That was the ONLY amazing performance I’ve seen by him.

  18. Minxx says:

    I’d love for Fassbender to win if only to stop him from making movies back to back, which ages him like crazy. I swear, if he keeps working like this, in 2 years he’ll look like Clooney. He’s the best actor in this whole bunch (Depp, DiCaprio, Damon) but he’s just not well known and nobody cares for the character he played. Personally, I’d love for Keaton to win if Fassbender cannot, but I’d be surprised if Keaton even gets nominated.

  19. Emma - The JP Lover says:

    I wonder why everyone is overlooking Eddie Redmayne’s performance in “The Danish Girl.” From what I’m seen, he kills it. I really think he will be the front runner (again) this year. 🙂

    I also don’t understand why “Vulture” thinks Leo won’t have competition this year as more good films with excellent performances will drop between now and December 31st.

    • Hazel says:

      They are ruling Eddie out because he has already one last year. And people think the Academy will give Leo his Oscar because it’s “his time”.

      • Emma - The JP Lover says:

        @Hazel, who wrote: “They are ruling Eddie out because he has already one last year. ”

        True, but it certainly didn’t stop Tom Hanks from winning a Best Actor Oscar for “Forest Gump” in 1994 the year after winning a Best Actor Oscar for “Philadelphia.”

  20. knower says:

    am I the only one that thinks it is WAY too early to call this? The Revenant was pushed back to January because it couldn’t even compete with the full slate of quality films coming out Christmas day. I have an interesting feeling too this movie has been hyped (for Leo really), but won’t follow through on expectations. I think Leo will be nominated but he won’t win.

    Will Smith, however, I feel will win the Oscar. His performance looks quite strong in Concussion and the movie is SO relevant to society, masculinity standards, lying, corporate motives, telling the truth – EVERYTHING. The Academy likes movies that make a statement overall about life and society, whether in the past or now. The Revenant doesn’t have all those boxes checked. Plus the white sausage fest won’t help.

    Lets face it: LEONARDO DICAPRIO DOES NOT TAKE ACTING RISKS. I actually think he will never win an Oscar – except for a lifetime achievement award. I think the same about Tom Cruise. After Born on The Fourth of July, I just don’t see another major chance for him either.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      You are not the only one who thinks this is too early.

    • cubfan34 says:

      I read the book and it was mighty gory. The film may turn some people off.

    • Josephine says:

      Early buzz on Concussion is awful. The cast looks amazing, so I was surprised to hear it, but my son (who is much more on top of these things and eagerly awaiting the film) tells me that he hears that people are super disappointed).

  21. Evie says:

    I read an article on Pajiba by Petr Knav that put a name to why I don’t really think Leo is Oscar material. It seems like his desperation is kind of crippling him, because we don’t see The Character, we see Leo Hustling To Get That Oscar.

    “Leo, in every role, cannot help radiating just how much he is ACTING. When he’s on screen I never see anyone else up there; I don’t see Jordan Belfort, or Jay Gatsby, or Cobb, or Frank Wheeler, or Billy Costigan, or Frank Abagnale Jr. I only ever see Leo, frantically preparing off-camera between takes; academically analyzing; never disappearing.”

    http://www.pajiba.com/miscellaneous/leonardo-dicaprio-isnt-an-amazing-actor.php — It’s a really well written article, I think you should check it out.

    [Also, he calls Hardy, ” Tom ‘this movie is now instantly better’ Hardy” which I found hilarious.]

    • The Original Mia says:

      This! You don’t see the character. You see Leo trying to get an Oscar.

      • stinky says:

        Have any of you seen ‘The Basketball Diaries’ ??
        Or ‘Gilbert Grape’ ??
        I know those are both super old fliks but his talent is the stuff of goosebumps in both. Now ‘Titanic’, and several to follow werent so moving. His Howard Hughes was excellent. Just cause he wants to dink around with models doesnt mean he cant act, y’all. Be reasonable.

      • The Original Mia says:

        Where did either of us say anything about Leo’s love life?

    • Pondering thoughts says:

      I think that due to Leo’s particular facial features (wide face, small nose, heavy-lidded eyes under thick eyebrows) he is too easily recognise-able.

      Otherwise I think he does disappear in his characters. If you compare his performance in “Catch me if you can” to his performance in “Body of Lies” then I think one has to admit that Leo as an actor does disappear in his characters.
      Other comparisons:
      “Blood Diamond” – “Wolf of Wall Street”
      “Wolf of Wall Street” – “Django Unchained”

      It is just the case that due to his face he is so easily recognise-able physically.

  22. pat says:

    I still believe that Fassbender deserves to be the frontrunner. Granted the flop that was Jobs commercially won’t help his cause, also because the movie wasn’t a great movie. Just and ok movie. But playing a real life character in a biopic without relying on physical resemblance and mimicry, but just in acting chops is real skills. Mad acting skills. Mimic is so easy if you think about it, for a professional actor is not a stretch: a good makeup artist, shaping the body with diet and workout can do the trick, this kind of acting often gets mistaken as good acting (a good example of mimicking a real life character without any nuance or real insight was the Armstrong movie directed by Frears and starring ben foster that actually bombed so bad in the UK that probably won’t get a US release). I think Fassbender did an amazing job. He deserves the frontrunner tittle. But we already know that he won’t campaign so Leo’s slate is clean.

    • Minxx says:

      Just saw Macbeth.. Fassbender is even better than in Jobs. His performance blew me away – I know it’s Shakespeare and nobody wants to see a classic and a downer but both Fassbender and Marion Cotillard are SUPERB and heartbreaking. Cinematography is amazing too – beautiful looking movie with a haunting musical score. Go see it if you can.

  23. Anna says:

    Go away. Play with your pussy posse. You’re just a pretentious, aging bloated frat boy. I don’t care about your mediocre acting – GO. AWAY.

    • Jessica says:

      I second that!

      • stinky says:

        ::: you guys are high… (wink!) :::
        Leonardo brings it when its called for.
        This production will be the first flik i leave the house for on xmas day.
        IMSOEXCITEDANDIJUSTCANTHIDEIT!!

  24. Moon says:

    Look at all those superlatives! Is he well positioned, or is his PR trying to ensure he’s well positioned? In any case Leo’s a good actor and I don’t begrudge him this, he avoided the game for a while and now he’s realising he has to play it to win it.

    • Pondering thoughts says:

      Yeah, I know I am repeating myself. Nevertheless I don’t quite see Leo playing the game to extremes. Last year Cooper was playing the game for American Sniper and he played the game quite intense: Lots of talk shows and interviews and lots of appeals to American Patriotism.
      Leo just doesn’t do that much. An interview here and there and attending the screenings. But otherwise? He goes off working for the environment and GlobalCitizen. When he was in India he could have done a lot more environmental / famewhoring pr. He didn’t. All he did were 4 pics on his instagram about that interview with the professor and another one with the lady Director of … and then two more pic in which he wasn’t in.
      I don’t quite see in how far this is playing the game. He has to campaign for the movie, sure, but I wouldn’t say he plays the game.

  25. Brow says:

    Leo doesn’t do the big physical and emotional presence thing. He’s not built that way. But he’s still a great actor and insanely professional and actually very humble. I hope he wins! I don’t find Johnny Depp’s career inspiring. Matt Damon’s a great actor too but he doesn’t deserve it for the Martin. Eddie isn’t that good of an actor but I haven’t seen his recent films. Fassbender is the best of them all but he did a superhero film so points off; plus he’s going to have lots and lots more chances. Money’s on Leo, with Fass for some other year.

    • Kitty says:

      “I don’t find Johnny Depp’s career inspiring.”

      Lmao, what’s his career got to do with him winning an Oscar for a specific performance? Not that his career isn’t amazing and inspiring. You should actually watch the performance then decide whether you think he deserves an Oscat or not.

      He’s a better actor than Leonardo DiCaprio, and much more humble.

  26. Susan says:

    Non-sarcastic legitimate question here:

    One of the criticisms of Leo has been his personal life. I guess the modelizing, won’t settle down, yacht parties etc. …

    Did Clooney getting married to Amal in all their pr puff and stuff make him a more viable, believable candidate or did we just kind of roll our eyes at the strategy and machinations behind that?

    And better yet, would suddenly marrying against type make us like Leo more or would it come off insincere?

    • lost in my head says:

      Susan, when something is real and true there is no such thing as ‘coming off insincere’.
      We as humans can tell when something is ‘off’ or fake, it’s obvious to the human eye. Something as simple as a smile that doesn’t reach the eyes, minimal eye contact, distance in body language, tense shoulders, looks as if posing…there is no natural flow, it’s just awkward.
      With the Clooney’s this is the case and everyone could tell immediately.
      You can be the best actor in the world but you cannot hide body language.
      I guess what I am trying to say is, if it’s true love, we will all know it.
      The eyes are the windows to the soul and in my opinion, the look of love is so real, eyes just sparkle like crazy and you can’t hide how you feel.