Jennifer Lawrence is the highest earning Oscar nominee this year: awesome?

wenn23467487

This year’s conversation about #OscarsSoWhite actually hijacked an annual conversation that Hollywood has internally, which is “why can’t the big movie stars get nominated?” While Leonardo DiCaprio is a big movie star, the majority of the acting nominees are not household names (in households that don’t read gossip blogs daily, like all of you!). Brie Larson is not a household name. Neither is Alicia Vikander, Saoirse Ronan, Mark Rylance or Rooney Mara. It’s the same every year – there are usually a few recognizable, big-name celebrities and then the rest of the positions are filled by indie actors, actors that really aren’t big-name movie stars who can carry a movie. Besides Leo and Matt Damon, there’s one other notable exception this year: Jennifer Lawrence. J-Law has become America’s Sweetheart in such a short time, it’s really surprising. She’s the Sandy Bullock/Julia Roberts of the new generation. And this year, J-Law gets another title: the highest paid Oscar nominee!

This Sunday’s Academy Awards have already disappointed many by overlooking the likes of Will Smith and Idris Elba in the Best Actor categories. One star who will be shining: 25-year-old Jennifer Lawrence, who earned her fourth Oscar nomination for Joy to become the youngest person to notch as many nods. Lawrence was recognized this year for her turn as Miracle Mop entrepreneur Joy Mangano in the David O. Russell-directed dramedy, which split critics. In the Best Actress category, she is up against Cate Blanchett (Carol), Charlotte Rampling (45 Years) and FORBES’ 30 Under 30 honorees Saoirse Ronan (Brooklyn) and Brie Larson (Room).

Unlike her fellow nominees, however, Jennifer Lawrence also managed to top our list of Highest-Paid Actresses. She earned an estimated $52 million pretax between June 2014 and June 2015–the scoring period for our most recent ranking–thanks to paychecks from the Hunger Games trilogy, upfront compensation for Joy and a lucrative Dior contract.

Lawrence, who made more than Vin Diesel and Bradley Cooper in the same time frame, was bested only by Robert Downey Jr. Iron Man banked $80 million pretax thanks largely to his disproportionately favorable paydays in Marvel movies like Avengers: Age of Ultron. But Downey, who has Oscar nominations for Tropic Thunder and Chaplin to his name, is not in the running for an Academy Award this year. That makes Lawrence a very rare combination: A highly bankable star who is also a favorite with critics.

[From Forbes]

I think it’s cool that this year, the most money-making nominee is a woman under the age of 25. Represent, J-Law! There really isn’t anyone else doing it J-Law-style these days, male or female, in this age bracket. I think Emma Stone is possibly a contender, but Emma is the centerpiece of two major franchises like J-Law (although Emma tried with Spider-Man). Now, all that being said, even Forbes notes that “given Hollywood’s cyclical popularity stakes, to prevent the backlash inevitable when a public figure has been too liked and too prominent for too long, it may be best for Lawrence if this year’s Oscar goes to a newcomer.” Yes. And as we’ve seen, J-Law isn’t campaigning this year, which is good. All she really has to worry about is not picking an awful Dior gown and not falling down for the millionth time.

FFN_FF3FF6_Lawrence_Jennifer_EXC_022116_51977053

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Jennifer Lawrence is the highest earning Oscar nominee this year: awesome?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. word says:

    Yeah awesome for her bank account. That’s about it.

  2. ReineDidon says:

    Well that explains why she advocates (in a Hollywood way as in to speak about it for 30 seconds to a magazine ) pay equality in Hollywood. Because she is way too high paid comparing to well, any other actress.

  3. CornyBlue says:

    Actors and actresses are way overpaid. That said I am glad that the overpaid one is not a middle aged white man.

    • Morgan says:

      Agreed.

    • Pepper says:

      How are they overpaid? If a film makes, say $500 million worldwide and something like $300-350 million of that is all profit, why shouldn’t the lead actors involved be getting a decent chunk of that? They’re the ones sent out to do promotion, they’re the ones who would have gotten trashed if the film had failed. How is better if they get just get a few hundred grand and the studio get’s to keep another 20 million?

  4. Mia4s says:

    Are we really going with revisionist history that the exclusion of Will Smith is some egregious oversight? I completely get Idris Elba, Straight Outta Compton, Creed, Benicio del Toro. I get it. But Smith? He was on all the prediction lists before anyone actually SAW the movie (which is a dumb clickbait practice across the board). Once the movie was seen it was mostly met with a resounding shrug. The fact that his name gets tossed around in this has me rolling my eyes.

    • perplexed says:

      I think it might be an oversight in the sense that if he were a white guy in a mediocre movie, I think it’s possible he could have been nominated.

      A lot of people have complained about the mediocrity of Joy, but Jennifer Lawrence still got a nomination. I’m not sure if Halle Berry, despite also being an Oscar winner, could star in a movie that was considered mediocre and still be nominated, even if her performance was really good.

      I don’t know if Will Smith actually deserved a nomination based on how performances are rated, but if he was on all the prediction lists even with people not having seen the movie, I think it’s possible he could have gotten one if were white. Brad Pitt has been nominated a couple of times, and it’s never really been clear to me why if we’re talking about his acting talent in comparison to the talent of others (what I’m saying is that on his own, he might be okay, but you start rating him next to the other ones in Hollywood, you can kind of see how he’s not as good as his competition).

    • Pepper says:

      I agree Smith was never going to be nominated. Unlike JLaw in Joy or Cranston in Trumbo, it wasn’t just the film that was mediocre, his performance was very average too. That accent alone…

      If he’d given a fantastic performance in a meh film, he’d have been nominated, but he gave a very flawed and forgettable performance in a meh film. As soon as the film was released it stopped being part of the awards conversation.

  5. jess1632 says:

    Lately I’ve been loving her hair and street style

  6. V4Real says:

    I don’t know which image is worse Bradley Cooper’s badge booty shorts or Jennifer Lawrence’s black ripped booty shorts aka Daisy Dukes.

    But I’m not mad at her for making bank.

    • GlimmerBunny says:

      Bradlifer is one of my ultimate real-life dream couples but the thought of them on a date wearing their terrible booty shorts makes me howl with laughter 😀

  7. Allie says:

    Oh Jesus. Robert Downey Jr was nominated for tropic thunder?! Whaaaaat??

  8. Maya says:

    Why do America’s sweethearts have to be white? Julia Roberts, Sandra Bullock, Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Lawrence etc are all white women.

  9. noo_noo says:

    You’d think with all that money she could afford a better pair of jean shorts.

  10. Wentworth Miller says:

    It’s kinda cool that she’s the highest paid.
    I think my only issue with her is the X-Men movies. I hate her as Mystique. To me, she just looks like Jennifer Lawrence dressed up in blue paint.
    I think that Rebecca Romijn made a waaaay better Mystique.

    Edit: Sh*+! Hello Kitty would be a better choice over JL.

  11. Alex says:

    I’m not mad at it. She negotiated a higher paycheck for Passengers and she notched franchise paychecks and a good fashion house check.
    Although she was spotted in Alexander Wang yet again yesterday so I’m wondering if that will lead to more AW in her future