Angelina Jolie arrives in Cannes

56149eu_jolie_b-gr_01
Angelina Jolie has arrived in Cannes! Just in time to walk the red carpet for Inglorious Basterds Wednesday evening. The Gossip Girls are reporting that Angelina and Brad arrived Tuesday night, as they were photographed “hopping out of their chauffeur-driven SUV”. This flies in the face of People Magazine’s reporting from earlier in the week, where they had Brad in Cannes as of Monday. LaineyGossip had Brad in Cannes earlier in the week too – maybe Brad was there, but flew into the Netherlands to meet Angelina at the Hague? Or he just met her plane at the airport and they drove into Cannes together? We’ll probably never figure it out!

Now that she’s there, the gossip has become about the clothes. Women’s Wear Daily has a “scoop” on what label Angelina will don for her first red carpet appearance since the Oscars. They claim she’ll be wearing a dress by Belstaff, the brand that designed several wardrobe pieces for Inglorious Basterds:

Rumors are already aflutter in Cannes as to what Angelina Jolie will don for the premiere of Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” — in which Brad Pitt stars — on Wednesday.

Word has it the working mom is considering a red-carpet dress by Belstaff, the brand behind the military-style jacket worn by her beau in the movie. Belstaff, which fetes its 85th anniversary this year, is sponsoring the film’s after party at the Baoli Beach, along with The Weinstein Co. and Universal.

The jacket worn by Pitt in the film will be on display, along with a range of Belstaff pieces due to star in upcoming flicks, including “Amelia” with Hilary Swank and “Public Enemies,” starring Johnny Depp.

[From Women’s Wear Daily]

In other Angelina Jolie-related news, Now Magazine is reporting a pretty interesting, if laughable, rumor. Here’s the catch – it’s a rumor I predicted several months ago, and I’m absolutely shocked the American tabloids haven’t put it together yet. Here goes: Angelina Jolie plus Liev Schreiber equals sexy hot affair. After the endless Brad-Angelina-Aniston drama, this one seems quaint:

It seems that Angelina Jolie’s had enough of Brad and moved on to pastures new.

When Angelina Jolie heard about Brad Pitt’s secret trysts with former wife Jennifer Aniston, it was the final humiliation.

The couple have been leading virtually separate lives for months, but Angelina saw the latest revelations as a green light to start looking at a future without Brad, her partner of four years.

Lately it’s been Brad, 45, who’s been enjoying the ‘single life’ again, drinking with old pals and leading the lifestyle he used to have with Jen, 40, before they divorced in October 2005.

But now Angelina, 33, plans to let her hair down and recently she’s been cosying up to her co-star Liev Schreiber, 41, on the set of their new film Salt.

‘Angelina handpicked Liev to star alongside her,’ says a source. ‘They’ve really gelled.’ The pair have also bonded over tensions in their respective relationships, since Liev is reportedly also having problems with fiancée Naomi Watts.

‘They’re in similar situations romantically,’ says our source. ‘Angie’s having a terrible time with Brad, while Liev and Naomi have also had their moments. They’ve been pouring their hearts out to each other. Angie loves how fondly Liev talks about his kids and says he’s a real intellect.’

There’s no suggestion the pair are romantically involved, but it’s a sign of how annoyed Angelina is after discovering that Brad’s been in contact with Jen, as revealed by Now.

[From Now Magazine]

See how beautifully that rumor plays? It doesn’t seem so strained, like the endless uncool Bermuda Triangle stuff. Even though I think it’s total crap. I’m sure Angelina and Liev really do get along, and maybe they’ve even developed a friendship. But I don’t buy the affair – I don’t think Liev is the kind of guy to step out in general, and specifically not on lovely Naomi Watts, mother of his two children.

Photos are of Brad and Angelina outside a restaurant in Antibes, France last night. Brad has been wearing the same shirt for like three days. Credit: Bauergriffinonline.com

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

40 Responses to “Angelina Jolie arrives in Cannes”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Candi says:

    I wish Angelina would eat a burger,and wear another color other than black.

    Anyways,I hear her marriage to hubby Brad Pitt has been on the rocks for at least a yr,so I am not surprised that she could possibly be having an affair with a co-star,as that is how she has met her other lovers/boyfriends.

  2. DD says:

    Wow that was quick: spend one day at the trial, take a few publicity shots looking important and the next day off to Cannes.
    She should just save the planet by not jetting around the world so much looking half concerned.

  3. Bite me says:

    She look pretty

  4. gigantor says:

    An SUV? Some mistake, surely – what with them being such “environmentalists”. I bet they flew commercial too…

  5. JackieSA says:

    Poor Angie! When Brad was there on his own, they were breaking up and he was getting back together with Jen!! Now she’s being criticized for not staying long enough in the Hague! She’s damned if she does and she’s damned if she doesn’t!

  6. Pufft says:

    I heart the smirk on Angie’s face – almost to say “Take that haters!” ( For haters, read Candi, DD, giganto and many others to follow)

    And Bradley’s expression is classic. I can almost hear him saying “Just smile and wave at the rumour mongering motha-f*ckers. May you all die a slow and painful death!”

    I abso-f*cking-lutely love it!!!

  7. Ursula says:

    Liev has too much class and brains to even fall for Angelina, she can dupe only hair brained cheap dudes like Pitt and BBT.

    So the trial took one day? Oops, she cared so much for those child soldiers that she had to fix them in her very tight schedule. How old does this woman think we are? 3rd grades?

  8. Ursula says:

    CB, my home page is stuck to 14th of May. Anything you can do to help me update with latest news? I can only get what is on the recent comments when I open the available threads.

  9. taratata!! says:

    she eats!!!!!with brad pitt!!!!! she’s so thin !!!! incredible!!!

  10. lilly says:

    lol DD, right on the money!

  11. John says:

    Poor Jen fans can’t win for losing:-(……
    First all the men that was attached to Jen denied her so quickly that it was so embarrassing. Then her movie tanked. Now Angie show up to be with her man. Jen fans are bashing their heads against the wall screaming “why-why-why” then run and post useless junk like that stuff up there. I really feel sorry for some of you mentally ill fans-i no it’s not all some are well adjusted and balance but the others are lunitics and live your life from a couch posting sick rubbish.

    w

  12. Cinderella says:

    Her halo is absolutely glowing.

  13. Madi says:

    Pfft, are you so niave as to think that stars don’t show up to promote their films together even when they have split? I am not saying it’s an absolute one way or the other, but word on the street was tha Quentin was pissed that a break up could overshadow his film (in Angie not showing up) and he and Brad insisted she get over there to do her duty. Just look at Madonna and Guy Richie who had been split for a long time, yet they continued to appear together to promote his film and her tour and then split at the right time.

  14. Lem says:

    why is Brad sporting a Johnny Knoxville look? A few days ago the header looked like Johnny but said Brad and here it is again? (over in the side bar under Brad in Cannes alone.)

  15. e says:

    “Lately it’s been Brad, 45, who’s been enjoying the ‘single life’ again, drinking with old pals and leading the lifestyle he used to have with Jen, 40, before they divorced in October 2005.”

    I love how they basically say he was living the single life while he was married to Jen. At first it makes it sound like they are complementing Jen because she was so much cooler and then it sort of backhands their relationship. I wonder if they meant it that way or if it is just sloppy writing.

  16. Pufft says:

    Madi, yes, I agree. I don’t know about you, but I’ve been waiting for this couple to make their split official since the tabs broke the news three years ago that Brangelina were no more. To my demise, shallow Brad and Angie would rather spend four years of misery together just to fool the world into believing that they are happy (and having Angie deliver three children was the cherry on top of the cake). Why don’t they just admit that they are not together anymore? Let’s hope they clear their schedules soon so that they have nothing else to promote and they can finally release a joint statement about their break-up…*rolls eyes*

  17. HUH? says:

    “I heart the smirk on Angie’s face – almost to say “Take that haters!” ( For haters, read Candi, DD, giganto and many others to follow)

    And Bradley’s expression is classic. I can almost hear him saying “Just smile and wave at the rumour mongering motha-f*ckers. May you all die a slow and painful death!”

    I abso-f*cking-lutely love it!!!”

    Interesting…because you called yourself “neutral” on another thread regarding the whole stupid relationship triangle…sure doesn’t sound like it here. If you were truly neutral on this, you wouldn’t “abso-f*cking-lutely love it”. If you were truly neutral on this, you wouldn’t care one way or the other.

  18. Melisa says:

    What a beautiful couple we can all see why haters love to start lies about them. Angie and Brad are so blessed.

  19. boomchakaboom says:

    I have no problem believing this “rumor” about the demise of their relationship. She’s not one to stick with anyone for too long because she’s pretty damned shallow in the personal relationship department. Her involvement with helping in global issues is what, for her, takes the place of intimate and meaningful personal relationships that last. Plus, it gives her public image a much needed polish because otherwise all that would show is her somewhat reptilian cold blooded nature. In my opinion.

  20. Ursula says:

    Remember in 2005, Brad and Jen did Cannes and denied any split and less than a year later, Angiejo was having his child. They even went to Mexico for a holiday and were seen walking hand in hand inspite of the rumours of what was going on inside the Mr and Mrs Smith trailer.

  21. Codzilla says:

    “The endless uncool Bermuda Triangle stuff …”

    Which this site perpetuates as much as any tabloid.

  22. Pufft says:

    @Huh: I am neutral – in that I don’t run my mouth about Angelina nor Jennifer on posts when it is self-serving. In fact, while I have often observed their behaviour – and commented on it – no one can accuse me of spitting venom on this beautiful blog where AJ or JA are concerned. And because I’m not fixated with either of them, I’m allowed to abso-f*cking-lutely love some of the things they do and at the next momen abso-f*cking-lutely hate what they do. That’s what sitting on the fence means. It means I can have an opinion about the one, without having the other in mind. I don’t make crude statements about the one to demote the other. I just simply make statements without the risk of being biased.

    Geez, didn’t know I would have to make the painfully obvious obvious.

  23. Rose says:

    Sigh, cheekbones, I remember when I used to have those. Or at least ones you could see.

  24. Iggles says:

    Wow, Angelina arrives in Cannes.. shocking!!

    When will the haters get it through their heads: just because Brad+Angie don’t issue denials for every rumor printed doesn’t mean the rumors are true!!

  25. Darya says:

    The haters are having to stretch their imaginations pretty far to have something nasty to say about Brad and Angelina, you know those two celebrities who help those in need and give generously of their time and money. Okay, we know you’re jealous and fit the loser in life category….move on

  26. HashBrowns says:

    Why does anyone care again?

    Oh right, the Saints may have broken up so every Brangeloonie was on Angelina-Watch (excuse me, Angie-Watch, since they all know her so well as to call her by a nickname) just to make sure their golden couple managed to keep it together for Cannes.

    How superficial can you get? I swear the most believable headline related to this would be “Brangeloonies wait on baited breath: Will Angelina Show up to a film festival to walk on a red carpet and solidify her relationship with her boyfriend in order to shut up all the Jennifer Aniston fans who somehow got roped into this story even though she has nothing to do with it?”

    A bit of a long headline, I must admit…but still, the most believable.

    @John: can we stick to the topic at hand please?

    @Pufft: You can’t say you are neutral or sit on the fence when you call the other side “haters”. It doesn’t matter that you may rarely do it for the other side, doing anything non-neutral basically means..you aren’t neutral.

  27. DD says:

    Pufft – quit lying to yourself you’re not neutral 😛 I hope Brandgelina stay together for all those kids sake but I still can form an opinion can’t I. If anything I’m more of an Angelina fan, but I do still question her motives.

    *taking a big gulp of hateorade now* – zomg crushed by her smirk in the picture.

  28. Annie says:

    A bit of a long headline, I must admit…but still, the most believable.

    Exhausting-ly long lol.

    Will the following article be a one-liner for irony’s sake?

  29. Ggirl says:

    The World Can Go Back To Spinning Now

  30. HashBrowns says:

    @Annie: LOL. Here’s the article:

    Angelina Jolie went to Cannes.

  31. diego says:

    HashBrowns asks “Why does anyone care again?” then goes on to write a book about the topic. Why don’t you answer your own question? Why do YOU CARE? Why do you spend so much time writing about them? You Jen/Ang. fangirls are all nuttier than a squirrel’s turd. I wish we can beam you guys back to 2004 so you can relive your glory days.

  32. Pufft says:

    @Hashbrowns: I call out haters in both camps – SO YES, that DOES make me neutral. Are we back in high school? Spare me the lecture.

    @DD: And you would know because you follow my every comment on every post about Jen/Angie? Yeah, I didn’t think so (and if you do, that makes you a stalker. Scary).

  33. HashBrowns says:

    @diego: If you’d actually read my comment, you’d see what I had written my “book” (aka a paragraph and then a joke) about these two crazies.

    I’m not a fan of either, to be honest. I think they are both fame whores like all actors are.

    I just think it’s hilarious how superficial the Brangeloonies are being by staking the success of Brad and Angelina’s relationship on whether or not they walked a red carpet together.

    But of course, you didn’t actually read my comment.

  34. DD says:

    @Pufft – dude you need to calm down, you sound way too invested.

  35. Codzilla says:

    Pufft: You claiming neutrality on this subject is like a crazy person assuring us he’s perfectly sane in between lengthy conversations with his imaginary friend. It’s laughable and kind of sad at the same time.

  36. u crazy girl says:

    Hashbrowns, not a fan of either? That’s SO laughable. You are the one who accused the people of talking bad about Jen as being bullies! You are the one who say the same nasty things about Brad/Ang. over and over and over. Stop lyin’, hash o’ shite. You don’t have a respectable bone in your body anymore.
    You are just like all the other crazy fangirls on the internet.

  37. HashBrowns says:

    @u crazy girl: I also defended the fat kid/nerdy kid in class, but I wasn’t really friends with or fans of them.

    Sorry, but pointing out when someone is just being a horrible person to someone who doesn’t deserve it doesn’t mean that I’m a fangirl. It just means that I see bullying behavior among a group of people against one person. That’s just how it is.

    I don’t go and see her movies just because she’s in them (I didn’t see Marley and Me or Management and I’m probably not going to see The Baster) and I don’t watch late night shows just because she’s on them (like I do with Ewan McGregor).

    I just don’t like unfair coverage and Jennifer Aniston not only gets unfair coverage but there is a complete imbalance of the “fans” on this site where her comment sections are always full of adulterated negativity.

    How pointing that out makes me a crazy fangirl is a mystery to me.

  38. whatever says:

    Yeah right, HashBrowns. Nothing says crazy like spending endless hours on the internet writing long-winded manifestos about how poor celebs like Jen Aniston are being bullied by no-name fools on the internet. How are they bullying the poor, fame-shy Ms. Aniston? By saying she’s duller than a piece of toast? How very tragic. Maybe, we should start a charity on her behalf. Come out of the closet, you groupie.

  39. laura terry says:

    oh god almighty naomi watt’s better watch her back, this woman is a serial husband-stealer.

  40. Pufft says:

    Do you at all read the actual blogs or just the comments? I would have taken your it-suck-a-Chinese-bucket-full-of-decomposed-human-genitals-to-be-me witty come-back (if I can call it one) had you not made it your life’s calling to give your opinions (albeit unwanted) on what posters said. I guarantee you’ll sound smarter if you take the time to comment on the content of the thread instead.