Adele: George Michael’s family wanted me to do the Grammys tribute solo

Adele at The 59th GRAMMY Awards in LA

Immediately following the Grammys two Sundays ago, people began wondering how it was that Adele was chosen to do the George Michael tribute solo. According to gossip, Grammy producers originally wanted Adele, Beyonce and Rihanna to do the tribute together, and they wanted the three women to do one of George Michael’s more iconic songs – iconic in America, I think – like “Freedom” or “One More Try” maybe. Some say that Adele pulled rank and demanded to do the tribute alone. Some say that producers jettisoned Beyonce and Rihanna from the tribute when producers saw how keen Adele was to do it solo. Now Adele says that George Michael’s family asked that she alone do the tribute:

Adele has revealed that George Michael’s family only wanted her to perform a tribute to him at the year’s Grammys.

Adele told Sunday People : “I was devastated, I had to go for a walk on my own and on Boxing Day I said to Simon, my partner, I have to do that tribute. They didn’t want a tribute at first – his family and camp – and they came back and were very specific that it be me. I said, ‘Great, I have got something in the pipeline. If you want me to do it, I will do it.’”

Adele, 28, added: “When the video came out, I was blown away by how f–king hot he was.”

“It is exceptional how good looking he was.” She also said George, whose hits included “Faith” and “Father Figure,” influenced her with his views on life and fame.

She said: “I found him one of the ­truest icons, because when people are that famous there is not fakeness in a bad way but they put on an alter ego to protect themselves, and rightly so. I understand and appreciate that.”

[From Page Six]

Does this make you think less of Adele? Last week, people were really mad at her because it felt like she had flat-out rejected the idea of performing with Rihanna and Beyonce. My take at the time was that it was the producers’ call, and if they really wanted those three women to do it, they would have gotten it, probably. But now I do think that Adele basically forced the Grammys to do it her way, because she was trying to honor his family’s wishes. Is that a drama-queen move or was she just using her power to have the tribute be family-approved? I don’t know. I still think it would have been cool to have Bey and Rih up there too.

Adele at The 59th GRAMMY Awards in LA

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

72 Responses to “Adele: George Michael’s family wanted me to do the Grammys tribute solo”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Ophelia says:

    I bet the family’s regretting it now, big time.

  2. MissMerry says:

    would Beyonce have performed twice? Once with two other powerful female singers and then with her solo set?

    I don’t think it would have happened that way, but I think honoring family wishes is important, I hope Adele doesn’t turn out to be a hidden diva.

  3. BJ says:

    Poor song choice for the tribute,IMO.

    • LadyT says:

      I didn’t like the song choice either.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I completely agree. It was so dour, and his music was joyful and passionate. Seeing the slideshow of his career while that song was playing, there was a real disconnect.

      The song was about fun, quick hookups, and she it turned into a funeral dirge.

    • Erica_V says:

      Agreed – it was the song choice that i really disliked the most.

      And i couldn’t help but be irked at how her starting over probably cut time out of the show that might’ve gone to people who were cut off while making their speeches…

  4. InVain says:

    I don’t have a problem with the way it was done or handled, especially if the family had specific requests. Beyonce doesn’t need to be a part of EVERYTHING for it to be great…and RiRi…no, not for this. A British icon honoring/memorializing another British icon – I’m fine with it.

    • scar says:

      “British icon honoring another British icon” Uhmmmm. Is that what this is about? George Micheal surprisingly has worked with Beyonce and not Adele so I’m sure he would have been okay with the other women too

    • Guesto says:

      @InVain – Adele a British icon? Icon?! LOL!

      She most certainly is not.

      • Jesie says:

        21 is one of the highest selling albums of all time, and 25 isn’t too far behind. She’s the only British woman/British solo artist with those kind of sales, which put her up there with Whitney, Mariah, Madonna etc.

        She’s absolutely an icon.

      • Guesto says:

        That does not make her an icon. It makes her a very successful artist. And, imo, a very over-hyped one at that.

      • milla says:

        She did too little to be an icon. She is inovative. People call everyone an icone.

        Bowie is an icon. Prince is an icon. They changed more than music world. Sex Pistols are icons. George is an icon, first white male on top of black charts. Aretha is an icon. Not Beyonce not Adele. We have no idea how will their music affect the future of music and art world.

    • milla says:

      But George himself liked both B and Ri. I do not think the family actually had time to think much about the tribute. They lost a brother and a son.

      The tribute was bloody awful and proved my point that Adele is not great singer and also that song choice was just a big no. She made it about herself from the moment she stopped and said sth like i cannot mess it up for him… blah blah blah girl he wanted a duet you were always too busy. George deserves soooo much more. Just listen to his tribute to Freddie he was Adele’s age. What a performance and what a way to honor Freddie. Every Queen fan loves it still.

  5. Lynnie says:

    I wonder what the family thinks of that idea now lol. Also curious about why they wanted only Adele… 🤔 Anyway bringing up the behind-the-scenes info piece by piece isn’t going to make people forget about the performance/think about it differently if that’s the route Adele’s going for. Move on and do better next time I say.

    • scar says:

      I’m even more curious than you on that lynnie. And yeah, why did they want just Adele? You have the option of having Bey, Rih and Adele together and you choose just Adele? It doesn’t even add up

    • Mynameispearl says:

      Probably just cause she’s a Londoner like him, maybe it just felt the most appropriate to them for a Brit to do it alone.

  6. Daisy says:

    No, if the family wanted it that way, it’s the way it should bave been done.

    • LadyT says:

      I agree. It’s as simple as that. Adele, Beyoncé and Rihanna performing together would be massive, so massive that any thought of it being a tribute would be lost.

    • lucy2 says:

      Yeah, I have to go with whatever the family wanted here, including song choice and performer.

  7. scar says:

    She destroyed that song. Even after restarting she was flat and pitchy. And that’s two Grammys in a row. Would we make that excuse Of bad productions for someone else? And I bet any other person would be branded a diva and ripped apart for going about it the way she did

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I agree. She doesn’t get called on it when her performances are off. She’s talented for sure, but she isn’t flawless.

      • Susannah says:

        A few years ago Kelly Clarkson did a tribute at the Grammys for Patti Page, she sang Tennessee Waltz and then went into Natural Woman for Carole King who was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame that year. It was wonderful. I wish Adele had done as well for George, as Kelly had for Patti and Carole.

  8. savu says:

    I’m a reporter and I unfortunately have to work with grieving families on a regular basis. I can totally understand how she’d just want to do what they asked. Not a diva move at all, if it’s what they wanted and she was fighting for them. I can’t imagine grieving someone I loved on any kind of stage, whether it was on local news or at the Grammys. So in your story you throw in the line about how they had an infectious laugh, or you do the tribute solo. Whatever little thing you can do for them, you do.

  9. Erinn says:

    “I have to do that tribute. They didn’t want a tribute at first – his family and camp – and they came back and were very specific that it be me. I said, ‘Great, I have got something in the pipeline. If you want me to do it, I will do it.”

    I don’t know. I don’t REALLY care when it comes down to it – but it sounded like she had it in her head from the time she found out he had passed that she wanted to do the tribute – which – whatever. Was she actually friends with him? Or did she just admire him? Because if she wasn’t friends with him, I find the whole thing kind of strange – like her first reaction was that she NEEDED to perform a tribute.

    I never really know how to take her. I think she gets a lot of free passes compared to other celebrities when it comes to interviews. As someone with a sailor mouth, I find it strange when she curses during professional moments – I turn my potty mouth off when necessary. Especially strange when someone like KStew can speak in the same way and get ripped up for it and very little said about Adele.

    Adele has a powerful voice, and her songs are well loved – but I’m not really a fan. I still will belt the odd song in the car if it comes on the radio, but I don’t ever go seeking out an Adele song. I find her music all is kind of the same “woe is me, sadness and exes are all I have” kind of stuff – a very pretty version of that, but it kinds kind of stale for me at least.

  10. paolanqar says:

    I love Adele but that tribute was awful.
    She destroyed that song.
    And why people have to always throw Beyonce’ in the bunch? She doesn’t have to be in everything. To me her performance at the Grammys was more than enough. A snoozefest to be precise, it seemed like it lasted forever.

    • Imqrious2 says:

      It did: 9 minutes!

    • Petee says:

      I am sick of Beyonce myself.She is not the Grammys.

      • An says:

        She can’t help that other people keep bringing her up.
        Everyone from angry feminists and their think pieces, to random Internet people. Don’t like her? Stop mentioning her. Like leave her alone already. She has literally said nothing.
        I’m not even a fan of hers and I can see the unfairness in how she is treated compared to others.
        She would never get away with restarting a song, cursing like a sailor etc she would be called a diva. Hell she is called one now for enjoying her motherhood and pregnancy. How dare she!

      • Diane says:

        An, perfectly put. Beyonce never really has to say anything outside of her music and performances. Why should she? When so many others are so willing to slap their perspectives and interpretations on it and say it for her.

  11. PHAKSI says:

    I’m not drinking the Adele koolaid since she ruined fast love at the Grammys. She made it all about her and not Geither by stopping mid performance.

  12. Patty says:

    Yeah. She ruined Fast Love and turned it into a sappy Adele ballad.

  13. Jaded says:

    Adele and Bey sure but Rihs vocals would have been a joke compared to those powerhouses

    • Jesie says:

      George Michael didn’t have a powerhouse voice either. You don’t have to be a belter to put on a good show and convey emotions.

      • Daisy says:

        But he wrote songs. She doesn’t even do that.

      • jetlagged says:

        Hang on, George didn’t have a powerhouse voice? Are we listening to the same George Michael? His voice was amazing, in my humble, non-educated opinion. Power, range, control, emotion – the guy had it all.

      • supposedtobeworking says:

        @Jesie – I kind of disagree about George not having a power voice. When he sang Somebody to Love, he belted – and held the note. I don’t think he used it often, he was a gentle singer, but he had a powerful voice.

      • milla says:

        Musicians agree that he had maybe even the best voice of our time.

        He was able to sing anything. He had perfect control over his voice. He was extraordinary talent and you should just go and listen to all the songs he sang live. Or watch any concert. He was a true artist and cannot be replaced or compared. Elton, Steve, Prince, Queen, Aretha, adored his voice.

      • Izzy says:

        Really? He was good enough to hold his own in a duet with Aretha Franklin herself.

  14. Ariel says:

    Wait, we could have had Adele, Beyoncé and Rihanna and someone said no to that?
    That was a poor choice.

  15. Miss M says:

    I understand the family wishes. But… It was not a good tribute and I still think if they were going for a solo performance, Sam Smith was the best option. But what do I know?!

    • lithe says:

      I agree Sam Smith would’ve been a MUCH better choice as a solo performer, unless he would’ve found a way to make the performance about himself rather than George Michael. I really disliked how Lady Gaga made David Bowie’s tribute about herself, and I really didn’t like what Adele decided to do with Fast Love.

      For reference, Adele could’ve looked up George’s performance with Queen at the ’91 (or ’92?) tribute concert for Freddy Mercury. He sang his heart out for Freddy in a moving rendition of Somebody to Love that made it feel like Freddy was right there on stage with him. https://youtu.be/UvM2Cmi-YRU

  16. Lucy says:

    Well, her love for him was and is well known, at least by me. It didn’t surprise me at all that she was the chosen one to do it.

  17. Nicole says:

    If they wanted Adele than that’s what they should’ve gotten. Its not that hard the family’s wishes come first

  18. Grant says:

    Why Adele? Why not an LGBT male vocalist like Adam Lambert or Sam Smith? It seems like that would be a more appropriate choice, especially if they were going to go with an ensemble.

  19. homeslice says:

    When I think of every beloved George Michael song…Adele can’t sing one of them properly, she’s not a pop star. That’s like asking Barbra Streisand to do it. Of course her tribute was f’ing awful.
    Personally, I would have rather just watched a retrospective on his life in video. Freedom 90 is on of the best videos of all time anyway…JMO.

  20. Alexandria says:

    It’s what the family wants, it’s fine. But if they asked me, I think Adam Lambert should have done it, in the normal version.

  21. jerkface says:

    Does it even matter? No. George is gone and no tribute will change that. Its a bit like arguing over who sent the best funeral flowers.

  22. jamie says:

    Adele was appropriate because George admired her. Then of course if it was the family’s wish.(So tired of Beyoncé, Rhianna doesn’t possess a good voice at all) “Fast Love” just brought to mind when he started to go down a slippery slope in the public eye. I found the rendition of it highly upsetting , instead of remembering him in a fond way with the beautiful images. Thank you for posting that link to his Mercury tribute , truly one of best performances of anyone. Not sure anyone could of done justice to his songs, he had a unique sound and yes he could hit those big notes. So gorgeous and apparently a kind person by all accounts. Very sad, untimely, will be missed always

    • Teri Smith says:

      I know she admired him but have never seen in any interview that he admired her music. He has said he liked her as a person though… He always said Amy Winehouse was the best women to come out of England.

  23. Beante says:

    I hated it I would have preferred Elton John to sing

    • Mary says:

      Elton should have been the obvious choice. They were friends. He performed at the final Wham concert and also performed the duet with George on Don’t Let The Sun Go Down On Me. I have been upset ever since Adele messed up Fastlove. It was way too slow. Horrible! And I actually like Adele and her music. Of all the songs she could have performed, why did she pick that one?

  24. Justmeonlyme says:

    I like Adele, but she needs to stick to singing her own songs, she does NOT have a Pop and happy voice – her rendition of this song was truly awful, like painful to listen to. When she started over, I thought optimistically that she was going to speed it up and do a better version of it, that she KNEW she was offkey and it was all wrong for her voice and the song. But then, ugh..that performacne…I saw NO difference from the 1st and 2nd take, BOTH were awful. Adele is the IT gal of music at the moment, but I think that was a chink in her armour, singing that awful version of Michael’s song, REALLY showed how her voice actually has limits and offdays and with the wrong song how her voice is actually is not as great as I thought!! Yep, sing your own songs only Adele!!

  25. Ana says:

    The family wanted Adele. Adele was a huge George Michael fan. I didn’t like her tribute, but it obviously meant a lot to them. Adding Beyoncé and the others was the idea of a producer and the family said no. I don’t think anyone should think less of Adele for this.

  26. Teri Smith says:

    George Michael’s tribute was awful. It did not reflect him at all. The pictures were great but the song and performance was horrible. Bad song choice, bad slowing it down so much. Glad Beyonce and Rihanna weren’t a part of it. They would have ruined it. It should have been a male singer who wanted to honor a true legend.

  27. bella says:

    I love, love George Michael!! His voice was amazing!!!! Elton John said he had one of the best voices of his generation!! His voice was flawless and he could sing anything! Adele’s tribute not just left me cold, but not only that, but I was very disappointed as well! As someone else commented, she was flat and pitchy! It was so bad, that I didn’t even recognize the song! It was horrible and a let-down. Beyoncé and Kelly Clarkson would have been fantastic! Just awful

  28. Diane says:

    I guess her heart was in the right place, trying to honor the family’s wishes….but the execution….well….