WaPo: Charlie Rose assaulted & harassed at least 27 women in the workplace

2016 Time 100 Gala

Late last fall, the #MeToo movement shifted from Hollywood to the media. Matt Lauer was taken down, at long last. Garrison Keillor was taken down too. But the one who surprised me was Charlie Rose. Last November, the Washington Post published their investigative report on how Rose was a serial abuser and sexual harasser of women, going back decades. Rose was fired from all of his jobs, on CBS This Morning, 60 Minutes and PBS. Months passed and it felt like Rose might be one of the first outed-predators to attempt a comeback. But the WaPo just dropped a second investigative piece on Rose’s behavior within the media ranks. They spoke to 27 WOMEN who were harassed and assaulted by Rose. You can read the full WaPo story here.

Incidents of sexual misconduct by Charlie Rose were far more numerous than previously known, according to a new investigation by The Washington Post, which also found three occasions over a period of 30 years in which CBS managers were warned of his conduct toward women at the network.

An additional 27 women — 14 CBS News employees and 13 who worked with him elsewhere — said Rose sexually harassed them. Concerns about Rose’s behavior were flagged to managers at the network as early as 1986 and as recently as April 2017, when Rose was co-anchor of “CBS This Morning,” according to multiple people with firsthand knowledge of the conversations.

Rose’s response to the new allegations was delivered in a one-sentence email: “Your story is unfair and inaccurate.”

[From The Washington Post]

Many victims would only agree to speak anonymously, but several spoke on the record using their names. WaPo details all of their stories, from Rose exposing himself to female colleagues in the office to Rose treating young interns like they were merely hired to service him sexually. One former intern, Corrina Collins, described a work trip she took with Rose in 2013 where he encouraged her to drink wine and then began to grope her on the plane, then insisted they work alone in his hotel room, which is where he propositioned her. Collins ended up reporting all of this to the producer on Rose’s PBS show where she was told that Rose is just “harmless.” And on and on – many women never reported Rose to anyone at CBS or PBS, but some did. And executives and producers just looked the other way. Time’s Up on all of these a–holes.

2017 CBS Upfront - Arrivals

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “WaPo: Charlie Rose assaulted & harassed at least 27 women in the workplace”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Astrid says:

    Wow, unbelievable! The list just gets worse and worse. Thank you to all who stood up to abusers and continue to come forward.

    • Susannah says:

      I agree, these ladies, some of whom were lodging complaints as early as 1986, are true heroes for fighting for a safe workplace for all of us.
      Seriously though, 1986, so 30 years of complaints against this guy and nothing?! He kept getting promoted, he was even working on TWO different shows the past couple of years! This is so unfair and the women were told that Rose was harmless, yet he harassed them and ruined their careers! This just makes me so mad! Thank God Time’s UP on all these guys!

  2. SusieQ says:

    The fact that management knew he was a predator and did nothing is one of the worst things about this story. I’ve been in this situation, and I can’t even begin to describe how demoralizing it is to realize that management isn’t going to heed warnings about a predator’s behavior. I felt like I was less than nothing, and the word of five women wasn’t enough to stop this guy’s hiring. Our right to a safe workplace was less than a man’s right to a job.

  3. NΞΞNΔ ΖΞΞ says:

    I hope this puts his attempted comeback on ice… and serves as a warning for all the other serial abusers that they need to wait this out. #timesup

    • Emmet says:

      THIS!!!

      How many don’t and won’t get this at all.

      Thanks @Kaiser for putting this up.

      (BTW want to say hi to Lilac, boredblond, et al. Still here reading, just working now under huge surveillance and unable to comment. You would think I’m at Langley, NOT!!)

    • K2 says:

      This.

  4. Penelope says:

    Sickening.

  5. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    Oh he’s harmless. Boys will be boys. Silly men. Just let him, it makes him feel important. Don’t take it personally, he’s like that with all of us. Don’t worry, he’s actually really gentle. Word of advice, whenever he starts_______, just laugh it off. Yeah, he loves women… we’ve all been there! Next time you go in there, do_______, it drives him crazy ha ha! Don’t act offended, it makes it worse. Tomorrow’s review day, wear something tight and revealing. Home office will be in on Monday, we’ve been asked to accompany the men at dinner: laugh at all their jokes! And don’t wear black, it depresses them ha ha. Whatever you do, don’t find yourself completely alone with that one. Don’t be scared, he wouldn’t hurt a fly.

    These are the immediate things I could remember off the top of my head I heard from women at two different companies. That “harmless” comment triggered. Fvck em all, and never ever let them out in public again.

    • Pandy says:

      Sigh. You could write the manual of responses Mabs! So sick of these d*ck wads … so happy for TIMES UP. Finally!

  6. K2 says:

    Admiration for the women who kept trying to report him, kept trying to protect other women, knowing it would probably fail, is immense. And people bleat that due process is so essential. Sure. So why are women almost always denied it?

    I really cannot fathom how they can justify a statute of limitations on sexual offences. It allows all manner of predatory sociopaths off the legal hook, because women were not listened to, and they knew it. So many of these men belong in jail. Repeated indecent exposure, and he thinks he can have a comeback? Vile, vile, vile.