Jude Law’s baby-mama Samantha Burke sells baby pics for $300K (update: pic)

hellocover
The Daily Mail is reporting that Jude Law’s baby-mama Samantha Burke is selling the first photos of her and Jude’s daughter Sophia. Allegedly, the price being paid is around $300,000, or roughly 180,000 British pounds (according to the current exchange rate). The Mail believes that Hello! Magazine is paying for the photos, which makes sense. And usually if Hello! gets the pictures, People Magazine will too. My guess is that Hello! and OK! Magazine (both American and UK) were probably bidding for the first pictures.

It honestly doesn’t surprise me at all that Samantha is selling the photos. Allegedly, she was already making deals while she was still pregnant. And, I mean, what else does she have going on? Her career is pretty much “slept with Jude Law once or twice, got pregnant, ka-ching!” In addition to the first baby pictures, apparently Samantha is also going to give an “exclusive” interview. Judging by these “insider” quotes, I think the interview will have a decidedly “pity me” vibe:

The mother of Jude Law’s love-child is believed to have sold the first pictures of their newborn daughter for £180,000.

A team of photographers, believed to work for Hello! magazine, last week arrived at the modest Florida house where Samantha Burke is staying with month-old Sophia.

Miss Burke could be glimpsed posing with her baby under an umbrella inside the £125,000 house in a downmarket area know as the ‘Redneck Riviera’.

Legal experts had predicted the actor’s offer to pay financial support to the 24-year-old model would secure her silence about the fling that led to her pregnancy.

But Miss Burke recently hired a Hollywood publicity agent to sell the rights to exclusive portraits of Sophia, and an interview about her friendship with the 36-year-old Alfie star.

One source said: ‘Samantha may have got pregnant by accident but she’s a smart businesswoman. The child has rarely left the house since her birth and when Samantha has had to take her out for some reason or the other, her face is carefully covered.’

Miss Burke discovered she was expecting Law’s fourth child after they had a brief relationship while he was filming Sherlock Holmes in New York last December.

She is now staying with her mother Lea. Her family have already spoken publicly about Law’s reaction after hearing of her pregnancy. Delores Burke, her grandmother, claimed he had ‘behaved as less than a gentleman’.

‘Samantha is a lovely girl but she is only 24 years old,’ she added. ‘At that age, you think you are a grown-up but you are still very young. He is old enough to know better.’

However, friends of Law have dismissed the allegations. One said: ‘Jude has said from the outset he will support the child, even though he is no longer in a relationship with Samantha. Jude has been a total gentleman.’

Miss Burke’s agent Eileen Koch confirmed last night that the publication rights had been sold for £180,000. Law’s publicist Sarah Keene said: ‘I haven’t any comment to make.’

[From The Daily Mail]

While I’ll agree that at the age of 24, many people are still making dumb mistakes. However, I don’t buy this whole “she’s only 24, she’s a child who was taken advantage of” crap. Samantha knew what she was doing when she hooked up with Jude – and she knew she hit the baby-mama jackpot when she discovered she was pregnant. I’ll buy that Jude was (is) sleazy, and he should use protection (seriously), but Samantha is as much of an adult as Jude, and all of this is as much her responsibility as his.

By the way, two weeks ago when Samantha Burke’s agent confirmed that Jude was the biological father of Sophia, the agent said, “Samantha can confirm that DNA testing has conclusively established that Jude Law is Sophia’s father. Check back in six months. Maybe she and Jude will be getting married.” Considering Samantha’s agent is still trying to attach Jude and Samantha, perhaps Samantha’s family should stop it with the whole “he’s a bad man who took advantage of her” stuff.

Update: Here’s the cover of Hello! thanks to Hello Magazine’s website.

Samantha Burke is seen on September 27, 2009, five days after giving birth to Sophia on September 22, 2009. Jude Law is seen entering the theater for a performance of ‘Hamlet’ on in New York on October 24, 2009. All photos from FAME.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Jude Law’s baby-mama Samantha Burke sells baby pics for $300K (update: pic)”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Jazz says:

    God this girl is trash. And there’s no way she is 24!

  2. Pole says:

    I cannot get over how tacky this woman is. Seriously. Selling out her child for money. What a famewhore. She must the most expensive f@ck, Jude ever had.

    Also I really don’t get how he is supposed to have taken advantage of her. He might be a whore but she knew what she was doing. I read somewhere else that she was “dating” two other in he beginning of the pregnancy – two other rich men. Obviously she’s not the innocent little ruined flower her family want her portrayed as.

  3. Teri says:

    What a white trash no class ho bag. Why doesn’t she just peddle the baby’s butt out for Playboy? Lord knows they’d never put her fat ugly picture in any magazines based on her “modeling” expertise.

    Why are stupid people allowed to breed?

  4. Firestarter says:

    My question is: Who gives a fig what the kid looks like? It’s just a baby. It will be flesh colored, pudgy and bald with blue eyes.

  5. Maritza says:

    What ever happened to working for a living? Everybody wants easy money, she probably is thinking of getting into a reality show also.

  6. AMy says:

    Face it. She got knocked up in a one night stand. She apparently was a “cheap” person to begin with. I have to say I kinda feel sorry for Mr. Law having to be connected to her in any way must be an embarresment.

    Just the fact that she pimped out her child for cash and telling about her and Mr. Law is just so tacky.

  7. Sigh. says:

    So she’s “a smart business woman” but “only 24,” too naive to know that unprotected sex with notoriously “loose” movie stars leads to babies.

    Uh-huh. Yeah.

  8. random says:

    Ugh. I feel bad for that poor child. Who knows if the mother will provide for it or just use the money for herself. And Jude clearly doesn’t want anything to do with her. So sad.

  9. Lantana says:

    I wonder which is more likely: to win Powerball or get laid by Jude Law while you’re ovulating? (Notice I threw in the condition of ovulation as otherwise it would be a no-brainer 😉

  10. Pole says:

    The cover is horrible! The poor baby looks quite uncomfortable and Ms. Burke seems to be seeing $ while telling her “amazing” story. “Amazing”?? She got knocked up by a one night stand and that is amazing? Oy!

  11. nj says:

    She lives in Florida and the kid is what, a couple months old? Let me hole up with my baby and cover her face in public lest I lose out on the big money! The poor kid has to choke under a blanket in the hot Florida sun and never see anything. Beyond disgusting. And I could not agree more with Firestarter- and I have an infant! It is the height of nonsense to pay this kind of money for babies who look like any other baby. Look at Nicole Ritchie and her kid- he’s cute but no cuter than the baby I just saw in the deli.

  12. MJ says:

    She is a pathetic worm to use that baby in this manner. She knows they only want to buy that baby’s picture because it’s Jude Laws one nightstand child.
    She is delusional if she think any one care about her.
    She is a ratty one night stand and nothing more.
    What’s next renting the child out each day. She is sick-her parents should be ashame of this idiot with moral values. No way do that thing look 24.

  13. Green Is Good says:

    Why would anybody be interested in seeing pictures of a baby produced from a one night stand?

    This woman is pure white trash, and Jude needs a vasectomy. Talented actor, but he’s a whore straight up.

  14. Green Is Good says:

    Why do they use the phrase “Love child”? Love had nothing to do with Jude humping this heffer and leaving.

    Twenty-Four? B*tch, please. Nobody is buying that crap.

  15. Firestarter says:

    Tells her “amazing” story?! What is so amazing about not using birth control and getting pregnant so you can become famous and financially confortable?

    She is not an attractive woman.

    @nj- I would much rather see your baby than hers! Congrats on your baby by the way! : )

  16. Cea says:

    Looks more like 34 than 24. Gosh how sad that she’s already pimping out her child. What a disgrace. Funny or ironic that she lives in an area called the Redneck Riviera. .

  17. wow says:

    Wait. He’s no more of a “sleaze” than she is. And I won’t even bother to get into the misconception (no pun intended) of people automatically thinking that they didn’t use protection. People have become pregnant even using birth control, but that’s a whole other issue.

    I agree about the “only 24 years old thing” not being relevant. That means nothing. Scheming has no age requirement or age limit. And what is with her Mom saying Jude behaved as less than a gentleman? Please. They were both consenting adults. So if he’s less than a gentleman, then she’s less of a lady.

    Jude only responsibility is to the child and he has said he would support the child financially. I guess I don’t don’t understand why people are hanging him up on a cross. He didn’t create Sophia by himself.

  18. wow says:

    @Firestarter – exactly. I don’t see why they pay so much to picture a newborn on the cover when they all look the same at that age.

  19. oh please! says:

    Please! This whole thing was a setup! She had that one night stand on purpose and I can bet you she knew she would get pregnant that night also! It is all a scam! It could have been any other star, but since Jude was the one in hand he got stuck! The woman is trash, the only one I feel sorry for is this baby! With a mom like that danm she’ll have a hell of a life in front of her! In not in a good way though!

  20. pj says:

    That picture looks like it was taken in 1976.

  21. Grrrrr says:

    When will these mothers learn that babies not cash cows & publicity stunts!! Please that child does not need any publicity in fact she (Samantha) should make sure no one knows who her kids is, she’ll be teased for sure about how she came about and now how her mom is whoring her out to the public. Who’s gonna pay that Therapy bill??

  22. anneesezz says:

    He’s an idiot for not using protection with someone he hardly knew. Men are stupid.

  23. gistine says:

    @anneesezz! Amen! Skank is 24 in dog years! No offense to dogs…no shame, no tact and no class!