Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Dec 10
'07
Sienna Miller wins record judgment against British papers for nude photos

spx-014534.jpg
Remember those nude pictures of Sienna Miller? No, not one of the many times she was topless on the beach. No, not the ones where she’s topless in Vanity Fair or The Pirelli Calendar or Alfie or Factory Girl. The ones where she was entirely naked when in character as a hippie on the set of her film Hippie Hippie Shake. Miller wasn’t too happy about those photos, because while she routinely goes topless on public beaches, wears nip-baring clothing, and has no qualms about appearing naked on film or in magazines she objected to having someone take full frontal nude pictures of her while she was working.

Miller won a judgment of £37,500, around $76,083, plus legal costs from the company that owns papers the The Sun and News of the World, for invasion of privacy for publishing the pictures. It was thought to be the highest amount awarded for an invasion of privacy suit in Britain. The case against the paparazzo who took the photos is still pending:

Newsgroup, the Murdoch-owned subsidiary of News International which owns the tabloid newspapers, contributed to a payment of £37,500 plus legal costs along with the Xposure Photo Agency, settling the dispute after Miller sued for invasion of privacy following the pictures’ publication in October.

The payout is believed to be the biggest of its sort for an invasion of privacy. The companies have agreed not to republish any of the photographs and have agreed to delete all copies of them.

However, the Factory Girl and Layer Cake star is still suing the individual photographer, who took the pictures during filming of Hippie Hippie Shake. An application for a default judgement will be heard next month.

[From The Independent via Huffington Post]

I guess when you’re Sienna Miller and the only way you can make money is by appearing nude in just about every film you make, you have to protect your assets. In Sienna’s case she’s all too willing to bare her breasts for a little publicity, but if you want to get a glimpse of her landing strip you better shell out $10 to see it in the theater. Her shelf life is limited and she’s trying to extend her career as a nude actress as long as possible.

Sienna is shown at the London Film Festival on 10/18/07, thanks to PRPhotos.
spx-014535.jpg

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Lawsuits, Sienna Miller

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • Kat: 10th time ??? Don’t waste the time or money. Go to jail, like everybody else. Maybe she will have a Jesus...
  • karina25: carrie saying that jessica simpson is fat??? she forgot the old days in american idol when she herself...
  • DLR in Canada: Actually a guy with one testicle doesn’t look any different than a guy with two testicles until...
  • Jeanne: I agree, yuck bad picture. Brad is reminding me of Kris Kristofferson. Enough with the hats too.
  • Jeanne: Cheapskate, tight as a duck’s ass! Or maybe tight as the ass Kevin Spacey was grabbing!
  • Jeanne: Hey don’t knock it, I wouldn’t mind in my next life being stupid and beautiful and throw in a big...
  • Jeanne: Why does she look like a tranny? Never mind coming out with a perfume, she needs to roll out a milky energy...
  • smarter than you: if you’re ever dumb enough to put heroin into your body then you deserve the horrible...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.