Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Feb 8
'08
Cirque Lodge says Kirsten Dunst isn’t there

ppf-002372.jpg
Everyone was all atwitter with the news that less-than-beloved Spiderman actress, Kirsten Dunst, 25, was reported to have checked into the same rehab facility in Utah where Lindsay Lohan received treatment, Cirque Lodge. Eva Mendes was even there, and it seemed like she provided some circumstantial evidence that Kirsten may have shown up by taking a break from rehab right around the time Kirsten was reported to have arrived.

The news originated on the Star Magazine website and then was picked up by other outlets, including People, which said that a source confirmed the news, adding that she’s been weepy and unhappy lately. She was said to have been encouraged to go to rehab but People’s source stated that no one close to her staged an intervention.

Dunst’s rep has not commented on this story to any outlet, but did say that “Kirsten is Fine” when an earlier story on the NY Post had her about to have a breakdown at Sundance. E! Online reports that they contacted the Cirque Lodge, who denied that Kirsten is there. While you might think that they’re just trying to protect a high-profile client, it sounds like a categorical denial because the Lodge director specifically said that it’s not a case of trying to preserve a patient’s confidentiality and that she really isn’t there. That was stupid, because now you know when they say “we don’t comment” that it means that someone is there.

While reports are running rampant that the Spider-Man heroine has checked into the Cirque Lodge treatment center in Park City, Utah, a rep for the facility has denied to E! News that the actress is being treated by the facility.

“Nope, not true,” said Gary Fisher, the lodge’s director of operations. He added that while the facility prides itself on refusing to comment on the comings and goings of celebrity patients, Dunst is definitively not, and never has been, at the center.

[From E-Online, thanks to Virgina for the tip]

So if Kirsten Dunst isn’t at Cirque Lodge is she at another rehab? You can’t put much faith in Star’s stories, but if it isn’t true at all, then People seems culpable too because they claim that the story is supported by a source. But you think if Kirsten was home and fine she would have either gone somewhere public to show the world she’s not in rehab, or she would have released a statement through her rep saying that the story was false. It seems like something is up with her, but at least we know that she can’t be blamed for Eva Mendes’ furlough.

Dunst is shown on 10/5/07 at Paris Fashion week, thanks to PRPhotos. I feel bad for her so I’m using pretty pictures.

ppf-002371.jpg

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Fake News, Kirsten Dunst, Rehab

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • Amy: WTF? Sex at 14? Maybe I was wired differently, but I was still playing with action figures at that age. I had a...
  • Amy: Yeah, why the hell do they need to describe him as the “chubby” star of Superbad? WTF? :roll:
  • Megan: I agree with Linda, can you really imagine Covergirl using a transgender model to sell makeup, I really think...
  • Syko: @A.C> - I’m with you on that, and just hearing someone say they have a “type” is annoying...
  • geronimo: Daisy - 1995. Based on a Paul Auster story. Also featuring Forrest Whittaker and Stockard Channing....
  • goons: oh please, this crazy tranny most probably trapped usher.. she knew it would never last because he would come...
  • Kat: Yes, she looks like a stuffed sausage in that dress. Someone needs to tell her about maternity clothes. That...
  • A.C>: I disagree with his comment that everyone has a type. I’ve never had a type persay. Is that unusual?...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.