AI has become a chicken/egg dilemma for me. What came first, stupid people who needed AI to do their work for them, or did AI make people dumber? Beyond the Terminator-esque “rise of the machines” aspect of all of this, the economics of AI make little sense to me, and it feels like one big scam. But I guess no one can deny that 2025 was the year where AI was suddenly everywhere and the biggest hot-button conversation. As such, Time Magazine made “the architects of AI” their Person of the Year. The opening to the POTY story reads like satire:
Jensen Huang needs a moment. The CEO of Nvidia enters a cavernous studio at the company’s Bay Area headquarters and hunches over a table, his head bowed.
At 62, the world’s eighth richest man is compact, polished, and known among colleagues for his quick temper as well as his visionary leadership. Right now, he looks exhausted. As he stands silently, it’s hard to know if he’s about to erupt or collapse.
Then someone puts on a Spotify playlist and the stirring chords of Aerosmith’s “Dream On” fill the room. Huang puts on his trademark black leather jacket and appears to transform, donning not just the uniform, but also the body language and optimism befitting one of the foremost leaders of the artificial intelligence revolution.
Still, he’s got to be tired. Not too long ago, the former engineer ran a successful but semi-obscure outfit that specialized in graphics processors for video games. Today, Nvidia is the most valuable company in the world, thanks to a near-monopoly on the advanced chips powering an AI boom that is transforming the planet. Memes depict Nvidia as Atlas, holding the stock market on its shoulders. More than just a corporate juggernaut, Nvidia also has become an instrument of statecraft, operating at the nexus of advanced technology, diplomacy, and geopolitics. “You’re taking over the world, Jensen,” President Donald Trump, now a regular late-night phone buddy, told Huang during a recent state visit to the United Kingdom.
I still believe that other billionaires/tech guys saw what Elon Musk did last year and it was a light-bulb moment for them: oh, we could manipulate Donald Trump too, we could ingratiate ourselves with these morons and clear the path to get everything we want. And that’s just what they did.
Within the cover story, Huang tells Time: “Every industry needs it, every company uses it, and every nation needs to build it. This is the single most impactful technology of our time.” Bitch, it’s not the space race. It’s not nuclear proliferation! You’re not even making Peanut Butter M&Ms, calm down. Every industry does NOT need it, every company should NOT use it, and few nations have a need for it.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, covers courtesy of Time.
- Jensen Huang during a reception for the 2025 Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, at St James’ Palace in central London. The Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering (QEPrize) champions engineering innovation which is of global benefit to humanity. Picture date: Wednesday November 5, 2025.,Image: 1050576140, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Yui Mok/Avalon
- President Donald Trump and Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud of Saudi Arabia speak with Elon Musk, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and other business leaders at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, Wednesday, November 19, 2025, at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C.,Image: 1053597204, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Daniel Torok/Avalon

















Positioning those greedy ghouls on the iconic photo of construction workers is insulting and the opposite of clever.
🎯
It’s repulsive
You are so right! It’s by design. Juxtapose this against a huge part of the workforce being deported for racism and cruelty and the fact that the rest of the workforce will eventually be replaced by AI. It drives me crazy when I need to reach a company and some AI assistant keeps repeating prompts to me I didn’t need or want. I have to ask for a live person 10 times before I am finally connected to one. Some things you cannot replace. I love when I call a business and an actual person answers the phone immediately. I try as much as possible not to use the self checkout. I just want to go back to 1992.
We had opportunities to stop this and didn’t. In another timeline/galaxy/world people will listen to Black people instead of gaslighting us and dismissing us as alarmists when we try to warn everyone.
I feel like all these “of the year” picks are just for click-bait/rage-bait. This, the panettone color, the dictionary literally choosing the word rage-bait.
*Pantone. Not the cake. Sorry. Haven’t had breakfast yet lol.
And now I want a slice of panettone…
Me too! LOL
Sorry! LOL I guess I was hungry when I wrote that.
Somebody should make an AI video of King Kong lumbering over and flipping all of these greedy soulless human husks off the girder.
Time Magazine has jumped the shark with this pick.
I wonder who the person of the year will be, when the AI bubble bursts.
That first cover is unintentionally perfect in all of it’s wretched photoshopped glory: weird proportions/angles, working class cosplay, and even managing to marginalize one of only two women by squishing her right at edge of the page. It’s AI in a nutshell!
I’m glad that they put faces to it – we should know what these monsters look like.
Yes to everything you said!
Are they really people or just AI? The Person of the Year should be Mackenzie Scott. Aldous Huxley warned us.
Quoted from instagram:
“Shit named poop of the year by ass”
I think the chicken and the egg are simultaneous. My ex-boss used AI for everything. I don’t think the guy could write a complete sentence by himself. And AI is also making everyone dumber. I can see the allure of AI, but try to avoid it using it myself.
Fitting that the architects of AI would be poorly substituted on an iconic photo of actual laborers – since that is, actually, what AI is at its core. It’s millions, if not billions, of hours of human labor and art taken and made proprietary in what will likely be recognized later as the greatest labor theft of all time.
The sad part is…it could be worthwhile to us all of it was required to be public domain. But it’s not, of course, despite being built on public work. So we all get to have our own work regurgitated back at us even in increasingly garbage reiterations of what we’ve seen before with the added bonus of seeing no recognition for it AND environmental destruction.