Meghan Markle penned a Time essay about the stigma around menstruation

The Premiere Of 'Personal Shopper' In LA

As we discussed back in January, Meghan Markle was briefly parted from her lover Prince Harry for about five days. She traveled to India as part of work with WorldVision and it’s “Rise Up Daughters of India” initiative focusing on the health, wellness and education of girls. As I learned in January, one of the big focuses of Markle’s trip was menstruation education, as in… girls in many developing countries face huge educational disadvantages when they begin to menstruate, because menstruation is still stigmatized in many countries, and many girls and women don’t have access to tampons and sanitary pads.

Well, Meghan decided to draw even more attention to the issue in this week’s Time Magazine. Time published an essay called “Meghan Markle: How Periods Affect Potential.” I guess Time couldn’t just call it “How Periods Affect Potential.” What would be the point of that??? No, we have to know that a prince’s girlfriend wrote this! You can read the full essay here. Here’s the first part:

Imagine a world where the female leaders we revere never achieved their full potential because they dropped out of school at the age of thirteen. In the Western world this is challenging to fathom, but for millions of young women globally, this remains their harsh reality for a staggering reason. From sub-Saharan Africa to India, Iran, and several other countries, the stigma surrounding menstruation and lack of access to proper sanitation directly inhibit young women from pursuing an education.

Based on societal ignominy in the developing world, shame surrounding menstruation and its direct barrier to girls education remains a hushed conversation. As a result, both household dialogue and policy making discussions often leave Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) off the table. Former First Lady Michelle Obama spoke directly about this subject at the World Bank in April 2016, and various NGOs actively seek out policy reform and programming to address this concern, yet the topic remains neglected.

I traveled to Delhi and Mumbai this January with World Vision to meet girls and women directly impacted by the stigmatization of menstrual health and to learn how it hinders girls’ education. One hundred and thirteen million adolescent girls between the ages of 12-14 in India alone are at risk of dropping out of school because of the stigma surrounding menstrual health. During my time in the field, many girls shared that they feel embarrassed to go to school during their periods, ill equipped with rags instead of pads, unable to participate in sports, and without bathrooms available to care for themselves, they often opt to drop out of school entirely. Furthermore, with minimal dialogue about menstrual health hygiene either at school or home due to the taboo nature of the subject, many girls believe their bodies are purging evil spirits, or that they are injured once a month; this is a shame-filled reality they quietly endure. All of these factors perpetuate the cycle of poverty and stunt a young girl’s dream for a more prolific future.

[From Time]

As I said in January, I admire her for taking up this cause. Even in Western society, there are well-documented stigmas with discussing the nitty-gritty of menstruation, not to mention the fundamental inequality of the cost burden falling on women. Menstruation cuts to the heart of the pink tax in Western society, but that is literally a first-world problem compared to the stigma, shame and misinformation about menstruation in developing nations, where your period can literally signal the end of your education. I applaud Meghan for taking on this issue and I wish that – cough – other royal women would too.

The Premiere Of 'Personal Shopper' In LA

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and PCN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

168 Responses to “Meghan Markle penned a Time essay about the stigma around menstruation”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. amy says:

    The Daily Mail comments are entertaining.

    • Melly says:

      Let me guess, people are going crazy because a woman has the audacity to openly speak about menstruation?

      I wonder how HM feels about this discussion?

  2. OhDear says:

    Good on her for bringing more awareness to the issue.

    • Lucy says:

      I just can’t believe that there are so many politicians, and men against letting women have access to sanitary products for free in the USA! I’m in Canada and I’ve never had an issue having access to pads or tampons. In the schools we have dispensers in the bathrooms and it costs $0.25 for 1 sanitary product, if you can’t afford that all guidance offices have full stock and you just go in and ask them for a pad or tampon. In university there are health offices on all campuses and they provide free sanitary products and birth control options for all students and faculty members. At my company now we have a full cabinet stocked with a million different products and you just take as you need and the purchasing department just orders more once it’s empty. There were so many times growing up where I needed to access the guidance office stock, I couldn’t imagine girls being in the position to not have access to these things!

      • OhDear says:

        I know, right? And yet Viagra is government subsidized.

      • Sixer says:

        Wait, what? US schools don’t have a tampon/pad cupboard in the welfare office?

      • Shelly says:

        No they usually don’t Sixer. Some high schools might have them in the nurses office but its usually this big hassle to get something.
        It certainly isn’t in the grade schools and middle schools, even though that is also a time most girls have their periods.
        Usually what all the girls i knew did was keep stuff in their lockers and purses all the time, that way we’d always have something for us or our friends.
        And that covered the friends that couldn’t afford it too, I know i had a couple friends my mom would buy extra for

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        That’s a thing? I had no idea there are countries where this existed, I LOVE it. German schools don’t have anything like that as far as I know, although it’s been a while for me. We didn’t even have a nurse or a guidance office. Not for this at least.

      • TheOtherOne says:

        @ Sixer. You are correct. Not all American schools have free sanitary napkins. My school had the option to buy but if you wanted a free pad you had to go to the nurses office and plead your case and there was always a limited supply. Also my nurses office was in the basement of my high school and the dread of having to go down there. So I just always just carried extra.

        And like @ Shelley said I kept the extras in my gym locker cause imagine the horror of opening your regular locker and a pad or pantyliner fall out.

      • Sixer says:

        Oh my goodness! I’m genuinely shocked. What happens if a young girl comes on for the first time in the middle of a school day?

      • Originaltessa says:

        The nurse or a female gym teacher always had extra on hand for girls caught in a pinch at my high school in the 90’s, but they by no means provided them for free for your entire cycle. I grew up in an affluent town in the Northeast so most of the kids in my high school drove nicer cars than the teachers, and affording pads and tampons wasn’t an issue. The Diva Cup could revolutionize the entire industry and issue. I wish there was more research and awareness around those.

      • littlemissnaughty says:

        Sixer, they’re screwed? I honestly don’t know. Thinking back it, would have been a crazy idea to ask a teacher for it, frankly.

      • Sixer says:

        Wow. At the school my kids go to now and I’m a governor, girls are generally supposed to provide for themselves (or rather, their parents are) but there’s a cupboard stock always there in the welfare office for anyone who gets caught short. And that includes basically catering for particularly poor kids who might be embarrassed when home doesn’t have a stable supply. There’s actual training given to staff to deal with that without shaming the pupil.

      • Sarah says:

        In high schools that are well funded (blue states) there are napkins in the nurse’s office. Probably not in red states.

      • Robin says:

        Viagra is only “government subsidized” when it is prescribed for cardiovascular issues, not when it is prescribed for erectile issues.

      • KB says:

        My public junior high and high school in Texas had the quarter machine things for tampons in the girls bathrooms and there were free pads in the nurse’s office. This was in the early aughts.

      • Bonehead says:

        When is the last time you guys were in school? Every school I’ve ever been to has free tampons and pads. Even my kids elementary school. Stop taking issues of third world countries and making them youre issues so that you have something to complain about.

      • Tata says:

        @bonehead, schools of diminished means in the US rely on community donations of sanitary napkins.often, The children do not have funds at home for sanitary napkins, nor even homes sometimes for that matter. And sometimes schools do run out of the sanitary napkins.

        I encourage you to volunteer in these communities, they need all the help they can get. There are many of these places in the US. I too was shocked to find that there were not necessarily supplies if girls should get their periods in school.

    • Really says:

      Exactly, it’s not something I thought much about. But I have the solution. Oprah buys one of the menstrual cup companies. “And a cup for you! Annnd a cup for you! And a cup for you”! Environmentally friendlier than all that waste.

  3. sarri says:

    I doubt that the royal family likes things like that, even if it’s for a good cause.

    • abby says:

      I dout they care and if they do more power to her.

    • Luca76 says:

      Considering Prince Charles is famous for wanting to be Camilla’s tampon this is probably a much better way to discuss this topic.

    • Jeesie says:

      Camilla’s touched on menstruation more than a few times in her work with rape and sexual abuse victims.

    • Digital Unicorn (aka Betti) says:

      Rubbish – this is the kind of thing that they expect of a working family member. I applaud her for taking about this – she and Congresswoman Grace Meng should team up.

      Harry – hurry up and marry her.

      • Tina says:

        Seriously! Harry is punching way above his weight, and if he has any sense he will recognise it and put a ring on that finger.

    • Tris says:

      That’s what’s so cool about her doing this. It is precisely the kind of thing they might think was vulgar or not to be mentioned. She just flew to the top of my respect list with this one!

      • Melly says:

        +1
        She shows potential for being a REAL working royal. Harry needs to put a ring on it.

  4. abby says:

    Great essay on an important topic. Good to see she went ahead with publishing it too. Harry must be proud.

    • Pandy says:

      I’m betting he’s proud as well. Her charity can be barriers to education. Whether it’s physical cultural etc.

  5. tracking says:

    Great cause, but the cynical me says she’s only doing this to prove herself “serious” and worthy of a prince. I hope I’m wrong and she’s still supporting this cause decades from now!

    • abby says:

      She’s been working with World Vision and the UN Women long before she started to date Harry. Last year she visited Rwanda and advocated for clean water, this year it was India.

      • Anne says:

        @abby – actuallly she has only been with world vision for under a year when she got with Harry. (Look up their website, it was Feb 2016 infact!)She was in Rwanda for 1 day only, busy witth the photoshoot with the kids she was supposedly helping. I am not a Prince Harry fan but this weird media worship of Megan by US based outlets is baffling..she had her sights set on moving in higher circles and her uptrading is marvellously impressive considering she ot in the same circles a the PM of canada! But some bug humanitarian she is not. I live in Delhi and I am appalled by her generalization of this issue in India because india is a huge and complicated country and Delhi and Mumbai are infact very progressive and it would be the rural areas where women face this issue,

      • Olenna says:

        I don’t know how long she’s been working with these groups but, in my mind, it doesn’t matter. If she’s helping one person or many by doing so, then it’s all good. BTW, reading the entire article, not just the excerpt above, might assuage some people’s indignation about whether or not she’s been doing charity work long enough to suit their standards and has done her homework before publishing it.

      • talktalkie says:

        @Anne

        Thanks Anne. She is a social climber just like Kate and if she was genuinely intelligent, she would know what the royal family is all about.

        If she genuinely cared about others, she would have done her homework and know what the royal family is all about. And the royal family know they are on the outs and are using her to give them a modern day spin… distract from how useless they are.

        Sorry kids…charity is a business. There are very few genuine charity organizations out there and many are used as smokescreens to commit
        heinous crimes.

      • Mousyb says:

        @talktalkie
        Hi Amy!! *waves*

      • Melly says:

        ** Joins Mousyb waving at Amy**

        talktalkie (Amy) I currently work and have worked at multiple charity organizations and what you said is not only wrong, it’s completely stupid. I bet you’ve never gotten off your Harry-loving ass to doing ANYTHING of value for your community or the world. So how about you shut your mouth? Charity workers like myself get paid SH!T for working in awful and/or traumatic conditions. The “business perks” we get is mandatory counseling to deal with second-hand trauma from our work.
        So if you wouldn’t mind, go f#ck yourself slowly, yet firmly.

    • Mousyb says:

      Shes been supporting causes like this for several years now before she met harry. I doubt she’ll stop anytime soon…If anything I’m sure she’ll be doing more work as she becomes more visible and well-known – whether she marries Harry or not (which at this rate I highly doubt they wont get married…).

      As I type this I realize I’m slowly becoming a Meghan fan/defender…sigh

      • Sixer says:

        I have felt like that on a few threads – and I am a British republican who had no idea Markle even existed before she was written about here for dating Harry. I’m turning into a devil’s advocate!

      • Megan says:

        I had never heard of her, or her show, until she was linked to Harry, but I’m team Meghan all the way. I think they are a great match and I love the idea of an American in the BRF!

      • Guest4u says:

        I think we all know that your Team Meghan, Megan.

      • Cee says:

        I think she fits the “job description” box in the sense that she actually cares and shows commitment to charity work and actually focuses on heavy stuff.

        The fact she is an actress and independently wealthy add to the performance part of it, but to me at least is inconsequential. At least she HAS a work ethic.

      • Lorelai says:

        I love the insane arguments about this. Like somehow, Meghan’s plan all along was:

        1) get involved in charity work
        2) meet Prince Harry and have him fall in love with her
        3) marry him and become a princess

        I mean?!! FFS, people.

      • Fluff says:

        Well, yeah. If I was going to come up with a nefarious cunning plan to snare a prince famous for falling out of nightclubs and playing polo into falling in love with me, it probably wouldn’t involve “campaigning to end menstrual stigma in the third world.”

    • Tanguerita says:

      Bullshit. She’s been doing it for a long time.

    • Megan says:

      She has been an activist for years. Her relationship with Harry gives her a bigger platform and she is using it for good. I have no problem with her leveraging her heightened visibility to call attention to a serious issue.

    • bluhare says:

      I will echo everyone else. She may not have written about this before, but she’s written other articles for publication. Say what you will about her, but she was doing this before she met Harry.

    • Whaaaaaaatttt? says:

      I somewhat agree. This is a great cause to support, but what else will she do? That Rwanda trip she did a year or two ago with her agency – they got some photos and did a video that is shown on every DM article they write. Has she gone back, followed up, done anything else? Or was it a one-shot? Serious question.

      • Anne says:

        she went in Feb 2016 and she was there for just 1 day.
        I second your questions…has she followed up??!

      • Paula says:

        I’m also curious about this. While it’s great she’s using her name to bring attention to an issue, I don’t know why spending a week in a place, writing an article and moving on to the next cause is considered humanitarism. What about all the people actually putting in the work and dedicating years to that?

      • Peeking in says:

        Who goes all the way to Africa for just one day? Perhaps Rwanda was a one day trip, but they must have done more. Please show receipts for your claims.

      • Whaaaaaaatttt? says:

        One day? Yikes!

    • suze says:

      I find some of the squeeing fandom annoying, just as annoying as the folks who live to say that their relationship is staged or non-existent.

      However, Markle does appear to be serious about social issues and has a healthy interest in the wider world. She worked in the US embassy in Argentina in her university days, she has been a counselor for One Young World since at least 2014, speaking on behalf of gender equality, and been affiliated with, and active with, World Vision for about a year. So she has put in some serious time and effort.

      In fact, she is so hard working and has such a serious portfolio, I have to wonder if she would eclipse both Harry and the royal family.

  6. Zoya says:

    Yup good on her for taking on this issue. also that dress is fug

  7. Indira says:

    People on the Internet say she “stole” it from Oni Lusk-Stover (Globally, periods are causing girls to be absent from school).

    • Alleycat says:

      Apparently only one person per cause! So much eye roll.

    • Megan says:

      This is hardly a new issue and no one “owns” it. I first became aware of the problem in the late 1990’s when a UN agency asked the agency I was working at for advice on how to raise awareness of the problem in the US.

    • Olenna says:

      “People on the Internet”… SMH. To question her integrity or motivation for highlighting a problem that affects so many girls and young women worldwide is just petty.

  8. Khaleesi says:

    Harry will marry the one after her.

    • Megan says:

      I disagree. I think she is the one and I think they are a great match.

      • Khaleesi says:

        And I think he will marry the one after her. Not that I really care because – thank God – I’m not from the UK and don’t have to pay for them.

    • Luca76 says:

      You know he’s really the one with the major drawback . The question really is will she chose him . I think unlike Kate who seemed to like the idea of marrying a Prince but has no real desire to be a working royal Meghan seems to get it. Seems to want to take on that platform.

      • Sarah says:

        After seeing those pictures in which Meghan was like a lamprey attached to Harry, I think she is quite excited about being a princess. Or Duchess. Or whatever. I’m not saying she doesn’t love him, she certainly acts like she does, although he seems pretty cool toward her. But she is absolutely dating down – and not because she is more educated than he is. Because he is a spoiled royal who really does spend more time jet-setting with his rich aristocratic pals than doing anything else.

        We give him HUGE credit for a few weeks of work a year with his charities. And really, that is all that it is. The rest of the time he is visiting Meghan on taxpayer dollars, vacationing on taxpayer dollars, going to friends’ weddings and safaris on taxpayers. Kind of like Trump’s idiot sons opening a Trump golf course in Dubai, and we paid for the security. Sad!

        Sigh. I used to like harry, but he seems more and more like his brother, sucking all that he can from the British taxpayers, every month that goes by.

  9. QQ says:

    He BETTAH HURRIES UP AND SNATCHES THIS WORKING BUSY CONSCIENTIOUS GROWN WOMAN!! Before men with better hair, less complications and more local start throwing it back at her

  10. Shell says:

    I’m constantly amazed at “the luck of the draw” considering where someone is born. As a white woman born and living in the US I wish it was possible to share privelige or trade some to someone who in another country is in a staggering uphill battle from day one. Personally you read these stories and you think “wow that fucking sucks” but that’s not enough. We have to do more then just be grateful that it’s not our plight. Off topic a bit I still find it so hard to stomach the fact that white women pushed Trump to victory. I want to grab people by the shoulders and shake them while constantly asking “why”.

    • Heather says:

      Shell, I too am having these realizations constantly. I am simply amazed at the inequality and difference in opportunity between counties and so saddened by it. A guy I know (white, Southern, conservative, privileged without realizing it) posted about how people trying to come to the US to escape their conditions should stay there to help make it better instead (as if it’s that simple), based on a TedTalk that showed the vast majority of people live in poverty and even immigration numbers to US are so small compared to the number of people in the world living in awful conditions. While I get the point, it strikes me as he just simply says that so it can make him feel better about voting for trump/Republican/anti-immigrant, and it pisses me off that they don’t realize they’re simply LUCKY and privileged to have been born here. Ugh.

  11.  SG says:

    Duchess Kate could never.

    • Deedee says:

      But she’s so keen, so very keen.

    • Anitas says:

      Oh but she goes sailing with Ben Ainslie for the sake of the poor kids, I’m sure that does them a lot of good.

    • Melly says:

      Has Kate EVER independently supported an issue? I can’t think of any. With the mental healthcare initiative she has Will and Harry.

      • Citresse says:

        No I don’t think so.
        Whenever Kate says “my work” with mental health organizations, groups, etc it’s positively cringe worthy along with certain publications which insist on calling her Princess Kate.
        Kate has been micromanaged her entire life beginning with her mother-quite sad really.

  12. Luca76 says:

    I really am relishing the idea that they could possibly marry I wonder if she’ll be encouraged to continue her work or if she’ll be discouraged from making Kate and Will look bad. This could be really epic gossip.

    • Cee says:

      I hope by the time they marry Harry assembles his own team and PR person. It’s the only way these two will be able to fuction to their max potential without being dragged down by the Master and Mistress of Keen’s dead weight.

  13. Kk says:

    She is actually the perfect next gen royal. I don’t give a crap about the royals generally and think kate is boring af but I really like this woman. She was participating in a lifestyle type blog for a while there and she wrote a good essay about being biracial, in addition to writing about her philanthropy work. I found that when I first googled her after dating news broke. She is smart and thoughtful and wants to make a positive impact in the world. Also, gorgeous. I am becoming a big fan and agree that Harry should try to lock this one down.

  14. Who ARE These People? says:

    Like him more for dating & supporting her. What a contrast with his brother!

    • Luvdup@aol.com says:

      plus 10

    • Melly says:

      plus 20

    • Lex says:

      Harry went out with a pile of generic pedigree twits before her, so it’s not like he is some saint

      • Melly says:

        The way you talk about his past gf’s is demeaning and unnecessarily rude. They didn’t hurt anyone and they couldn’t control who their parents are.

      • Fleur says:

        Melly’s right. Chelsey comes from a wealthy family but she was set on getting a real job and making her way as a working lawyer. By all accounts that’s exactly what Chelsey’s done. Cressida had the option to coast on her rich family’s money but she was determined to finish her dance degree instead, and she preferred the idea of being a work-a-day actress to the idea of being a royal.

        Harry seems to really want and purposefully look for independent women because that’s the only kind he’s ever had serious relationships with. I think he better lock down Meghan while he can because she’s a grown, educated woman with her own life and plenty of prospects. LOVED Meghan’s essay and the fact that she’s talking about menstruation and poverty.

  15. Lucy says:

    Great essay. Really puts this issue in perspective.

  16. maggie grace says:

    She had me at the picture where she has her shoe off.

  17. derpshooter says:

    Recently in the news was the death of a woman who was staying in a traditional “hut” during her period. She froze to death one night because it was winter and very cold where she lived. This was somewhere in sub-continental Asia. I put quotes around hut because it looks more like an oversized doghouse and does not have all the things the women’s real home had. These period huts are illegal in that country, but many rural areas still use them and many women still believe they deserve to be sent away from everyone else during their period. Even the women that don’t want to use the huts still do because they have few rights and no resources to fight for legal treatment by their husbands and families. More power to Markle and anyone else fighting against menstruation stigmas: it’s not just embarrassment or money at stake, stigmas can kill.

    • Emma33 says:

      I am guessing this could have been in Nepal. I spent most of last year there and stigma due to menstruation is terrible. In some rural areas, women and girls have to hide themselves away in little huts while they’re menstruating. Even in more ‘enlightened’ families, women can’t hand food to other people, touch certain items of food, or participate in religious festivals while they are menstruating. I remember sitting with one young friend who was in tears because she was going to miss out on getting a “good luck” blessing from her grandfather during the year’s biggest festival because she’d just gotten her period that morning. It is just horrible, and I’m glad awareness of this issue is being raised!

    • Imqrious2 says:

      It really is a sad commentary in today’s world. In the Orthodox Jewish community, women are considered “unclean” during menstruation, and have to visit a Mikva (ritual bath) after to be cleansed. (And before you call me a name, I am Jewish – not Orthodox though, and I had a friend who had to do this).

  18. graymatters says:

    My mother grew up impoverished and neglected. When her period started, she thought she was going to die. Eventually and adult explained the situation, but the term “original sin” factored into it. She raised me better — worlds better — than she experienced.

    I don’t think the people who voted for Trump understand how recently this sort of poverty affected people in the west.

    • Sixer says:

      Or even today. I always buy a pack of tampons for the food bank collection in the supermarket since I discovered that British women were turning up to food banks with toilet paper in their knickers.

    • Eye rolling every day here says:

      You’re wrong. I’ve heard all the stories of desperate poverty from my parents and grandparents, and they never expected anyone to give them anything nor change things for them. It doesn’t get more impoverished than Appalachia, but my 96 year old grandmother voted Trump. No she isn’t senile either, she can still remember her first memory and can keep track of her probably around 100 descendants among other things. But she and many of that time were too proud to beg for charity. I can’t even imagine a time when people had more pride than to demand free stuff from others! Sounds wonderful, and I say this as a poor person that gets by without handouts or demands for others to subsidize my life. I have a twenty year old car, an old house, get my clothes from yard sales and thrift stores and grow my own food. And I’m happy with it because I didn’t demand it from anyone. I got it myself. Where does this sense of entitlement come from? I’d really like to know what makes people think they have a right to the money I, or anyone, earn?

      • Olenna says:

        I strongly disagree with your comment about entitlement and I hope someone with more tact than I have can address it with more diplomacy than it probably deserves.

      • Fluff says:

        God it’s like a Trump campaign became sentient.

        Yes yes we’ve all heard the “pick yourself up by your bootstraps” speech a million billion times.

      • Melly says:

        @Eye rolling every day here
        You don’t need anyone to explain entitlements to you or talking patronizingly about your situations or your opinions. I respectfully disagree with your assessment of “handouts” and demands to “subsidize” peoples “lifestyles”. I assume for work/life you drive on roads. I also assume by your good vocabulary and grammar you attended school (likely public). To build and maintain things like schools and roads the government takes some of your money for the greater good of society. It’s part of our social contract that the government provides for the greater welfare. I strongly believe that those on the lower end of the economic scale should not carry the burden, those on the upper end of the economic scale should pay a little more.

      • Otaku Fairy says:

        @eye-rolling-every-day-here:”Where does this sense of entitlement come from? I’d really like to know what makes people think they have a right to the money I, or anyone, earn?”
        Translation: MeMeMeMeMe! Survival of the fittest! Look out for number 1! Not my problem!
        Because that’s really what the republican whining about why their tax dollars should go to help with other human beings’ basic needs goes down to: “Why can’t those people have a little pride and stop being so entitled to the basics of life” is just a cover for selfishness and a lack of empathy for others.
        Perhaps you’d be better off asking about why your tax dollars are subsidizing the wall Trump plans to have built and his family’s lifestyle choices.
        And you didn’t do your dear old-gram-grams any favors by mentioning the fact that she ISN’T senile and still voted for Trump, honey. At least then she would have had an excuse. Hate to break it to you, but chances are a 96-year-old who’s voting for Donald Trump is either grossly uninformed about the candidate she voted for or is okay with rape, racism, sexism, and homophobia and doesn’t give a shit about the poor and the disabled. And if you’re proud of the things your grandmother is complicit in, and made the decision to follow in her footsteps this election season, then you’re no better. At least with her being 96, we don’t have to deal with HER causing problems for everyone who isn’t a cis, straight, American-born wealthy white male every 4 years for much longer.

      • Tata says:

        @eyes if you went to schools Of poor kids, you would see a lot of kids are embarrassed to ask for help. They don’t demand it like you say. Same with adults.

        Trump doesn’t pay taxes and he is a billionaire. That is like stealing from a food bank when you own a grocery store, restaurant, personal chef and can eat what you want whenever you want.

        He profits from government right now in fact, continues to not pay taxes because it is smart as he says, and then his supporters get mad we are talking about helping women with menstruation?

        At least hillary and bill pay taxes.

        Thing is – No one likes having to take charity, but sometimes a little grace from the world does wonders.

        If you think it is a bad thing to ask for help when you are down and out, that is not our issue, it is yours.

      • graymatters says:

        A nation is only as strong as its people. Taxes that go towards education and health care are not charity, but an investment into the nation’s future. Citizens who grow up healthy and knowledgeable are better able to create jobs, serve their communities, and provide taxes to support security, infrastructure, and the next generation.

        Based on their actions, the Republican approach to public health care is that it’s only for the healthy and that quality education is only for the rich. This will increase the class divide and impoverish the nation as a whole.

  19. HoustonGrl says:

    This is exactly the kind of issue a modern royal should be tackling.

  20. Citresse says:

    Nice to see her put in much more of an effort prior to and after meeting Harry. We never saw this from Kate, I mean what has she ever really accomplished other than marrying a prince and birthing two heirs. When William ended the relationship, she partied and the rollerskating event had a charity in mind, however Kate never used her position to highlight anything on a global scale. She’s too timid, too dimwitted, too lazy. She’s not cut out for public life, same applies to William.

    • Cee says:

      I think she doesn’t care. She’s not timid. Dimwitted, maybe. Lazy? Only when it pertains to anything but WILLIAM and her body. IMO she lacks empathy and is apathetic.

  21. suze says:

    Time is leveraging her name for a good cause – tit for tat as always. I have no issue with it in that the education of women is a huge priority in the developing world, and anything that stands between girls and school, or girls and their full participation in society, is a huge drawback.

    I am digging – big time – that she is getting her agenda out there before she is an official royal anything. VERY wise. I appreciate her savvy.

  22. Bubbles says:

    Women get periods, always have, always will. The end. People need to accept this. Periods are here to stay. Buy your tampons, pads and cups and shut up about it. There are more important things in the world. If you feel like women in certain areas or classes cannot afford it then contact your congressman or donate your own resources wherever you see fit. I don’t understand the problem and I’m a woman that has my period for over 20 years. I donate feminine products to a local shelter b/c they don’t have the means to get them. It’s not rocket science. This is 2017 not the dark ages.

    • LAK says:

      Until you travel to some parts of the world where they still have dark age beliefs about these things hence her essay.

      See upthread example about rural villages in Nepal.

    • Tourmaline says:

      “contact your congressman” lol yeah they will get right on it.

      How about people get sick and die, people abuse kids, hence “People need to accept this.” “Shut up about it.” Just because you don’t grasp the problem doesn’t mean others shouldn’t care and help. No way.

    • Luca76 says:

      How about you just accept that people feel moved to do something about this issue. You are free to stay apathetic because that’s clearly your thing. But it’s something that not just Meghan but many humanitarians have identified as a crucial need that can improve the lives of many girls and ultimately give them a chance to get an education and improve their society.

    • Ankhel says:

      You’re kind to donate products, Bubbles. I wish menstruation isn’t seen as a big deal either – sadly it is in some parts.

    • Jack Daniels is my patronus says:

      This is exactly what she is trying to point out in her essay. Periods are here to stay, but that doesn’t mean we should “shut up about it.” I’m thankful and privileged to live in a place where I had easy access to feminine hygiene products, that I only had to miss school a few times with severe cramps.

      This isn’t about women in wealthy countries. It is about poor impoverished women who are seen as lesser than human once they start menstruating. And I will never shut up about that

    • Moneypenny says:

      Have you been having your period for 20 years in Nepal? Mali? Rural India? Travel, do public health work around the world and then talk about this.

    • Fluff says:

      Jesus Christ.

      What else do you think women should “shut up” about? Rape? The gender wage gap? Abortion being illegal in some countries?

  23. Mar says:

    Kate- your move.

    Megan already has one up on her….

  24. Joannie says:

    Did anyone even know she existed prior to Harry? She wouldnt have near the exposure if she hadnt hooked up with him. Suddenly she’s a humanitarian because she gone on a few trips for World Vision like numerous HW people do for PR purposes. I went out and bought 150 dollars worth of socks and underwear for men in the homeless shelter. That doesnt make me a humanitarian. Kate does lots for charity. People on here dont want to recognize it. Even when she is working ppl say she isnt. Oh the hypocrisy!

    • graymatters says:

      Actually, your gift to the homeless shelter was an act of generosity towards your fellow humans and does make you a humanitarian. Sorry to be so hard on you.

      • Joannie says:

        I guess my point is to put someone on a pedestal only to take another down isnt right. I could be wrong but thats what I’m reading in some of the comments. Theyre both women in different circumstances. How can we compare?

      • graymatters says:

        If your point is that being the SO of a prince isn’t a see-saw, where one woman can only be “up” if the other is “down”, then that’s valid. But we can compare them because they are both public figures, both romantically involved with a British prince, and both in their mid-30’s. We’ve been (perhaps over-)analyzing Kate for nearly a decade now and Meghan seems stronger in some of the areas this cb-ers deem important.

        If it helps to restore equilibrium, I don’t think either of them look particularly good in Erdem, and there was a lot of Cambridgesque body-language critiquing of the wedding pics.

      • bluhare says:

        But isn’t that what you just did, Joannie? Put someone up on a pedestal only to take another down? I do agree that they are both women in somewhat different circumstances *now*, but they weren’t always. Kate used to be single too. I also agree that one shouldn’t be put down because of the other. I think Kate does the bare minimum. Time will tell about Meghan Markle.

    • Peeking in says:

      She was a humanitarian for many years, prior to dating Harry, since her university days. Please research before criticizing.
      Why does shinning light on 3rd world issues make you so angry?
      Here is some recognition for your generous donation to the homeless.

      • Joannie says:

        I think you are missing my point. Im not angry. Are you?

      • Peeking in says:

        Nope. Not missing your point at all. No one is putting Ms Markle on a pedestal, just simply acknowledging her humanitarianism. People are criticizing her as if she is doing this to trap Prince Harry, when she has always done charity work.
        I have no reason to be angry. Glad to hear you’re not angry either – your initial comment read like you are mad that Megan is getting attention for her work. There are myriad non-famous people, who are unrecognized for their generosity. Sorry if I came off as harsh, it was not my intention.

      • Joannie says:

        @Peeking, read comment #24 and then the reply underneath. They are one example. There are others above. Prior to Harry I have never heard of this person. I know I’m unpopular on CB for defending Kate. It’s ok.

      • Luvdup@aol.com says:

        What I hated about Kate was that she had Nooooooooooooooooo interest outside of waiting for and chasing or following William around for a decade and this was in her 20’s when many people build careers or take jobs.

        So what if many never heard of Meghan prior to Harry, it’s that way for almost every Royal girlfriend or bride except maybe Grace Kelly who was a Academy Award winner and one of the most well known movie stars in the the world at the time.
        I had never heard of most of the current royal consorts or married in Princesses until they met and married their Royal partner. I Love Letizia of Spain, but I never heard of Letizia Ortiz of Spain until she married the now King of Spain , so what does that matter? Letizia was a hardworking lady on tv as a reporter with her own life and career and causes. Of course dating a Prince or marrying a Prince will bring more worldwide coverage to ladies. IMO
        The reason I have never liked Kate is that she had no outside interests except William. I just found Kate so needy to the point of desperation, it made her unattractive to me and still does, But the chill-in are adorable.

      • Peeking in says:

        Joanie I don’t give a crap about Kate one way or the other. I’ve never said anything negative about her, nor do I compare her and Meghan.
        What does you not having heard about her have to do with her charitable work? I don’t understand what you’re trying to say.
        Did you know who Kate was before she dated William?

    • Tough Cookie says:

      Joanie I don’t always agree with you…and I’m not going to this time either!! I think what you did was a wonderful and generous act of humanitarianism and you are being too modest. You have inspired me. XXXOOO

    • Luvdup@aol.com says:

      The difference is Kate didn’t do Squat until she bagged William in marriage. Meghan has been doing charities on her own for years. Meghan is a self starter who doesn’t need a boyfriend to give her a reason for getting involved in world issues and charities. Whereas Kate spent almost a decade her entire twenties basically just running after William and partying at every club in London and going on holidays until she got the ring, THEN Kate decided to do charities, but even then it’s like the Palace had to pull teeth.

      • Canadian Becks says:

        Ummm….Kate didn’t “decide to do charities”. Once she accepted that ring, she really had no choice.

        I get your point, but let’s not give her undue credit.

  25. Cherrypie says:

    Harry will marry Rhi Rhi

  26. vic says:

    Bags for Girls, BFG, website for making menstruation kits for the girls of which she writes

  27. misery chick says:

    After reading this article and comments, I’m so ashamed! I had absolutely NO idea that menstruation was a stigma!!!!!!! Women becoming outcasts in their own families due to a natural function. My heart cries. As Oprah (and probably many other people) have said, “when you know better, you do better”. And I will.

    • graymatters says:

      And that is what using the public attention garnered by dating a prince is all about.

    • Lex says:

      Yeah absolutely – it’s just awful in some places. Some women have to go live in a shack outside during their period because they’re seen as unclean and unholy. They are barred from entering temples/churches/whatever because it’s believed it will anger their gods. They are considered sub-human for a few days a month. Girls cannot go to school or work as they’ll bleed through their clothes. If they’re lucky enough to have a rag to use, they spend days sitting in smelly old blood before they can properly wash it all out. It’s just awful and so unnecessary.

      Menstrual cups are a revelation. I absolutely love mine and have donated to a charity that provides them to girls in countries of Africa. I try spread the word wherever I can but SO many women are militantly resistant to it for no other reason than it seems ‘icky’. We’ve internalised shame and fear towards menstruation so that ordinary level headed women turn their noses up at sensible suggestions. Sigh.

      Anyone who is thinking of making the switch, DO IT! Give it a go. $50 for 10 years of use. Cannot beat that value. It takes getting used to (as tampons did when you were young) but once you’re there, it’s fantastic.

  28. seesittellsit says:

    Oh, dear. Whatever my own feelings on the matter, I don’t think this is really great for a future BRF member. They have their limits.

    This persuades me even more that it is Markle who is making a mistake, and that the restrictions and stuffiness of the BRF will make her life a misery. I think she should run, fast, in another direction. I’m still rooting for the billionaire businessman who will help her found her own empire.

  29. G says:

    I have no snark for this. This is really cool of her.

  30. Harlan Jodet says:

    The Daily Beast has a great piece about her and her early (age 11) start with speaking out in order to help others. Sorry I can’t provide the link but my phone doesn’t do that. But look at the royalist/the daily beast.