Page Six: Duchess Meghan & Jessica Mulroney have ‘been on the outs for some time’

Jessica Mulroney arrives at Strahan, Sara & Keke

Jessica Mulroney is a privileged, racist mess. I’m still sort of flabbergasted by HOW things went so badly between Mulroney and Sasha Exeter, with Mulroney somehow taking it personally that Exeter was posting about Black Lives Matter. In the wake of Exeter’s callout, Mulroney is on leave from some of her jobs, and she’s been outright fired from others. But what of her friendship with the Duchess of Sussex? Jessica knew Meghan before royalty, you know. Sources have been describing Meghan’s reaction to Jessica’s racist mess as “mortified” and “heartbroken.” Maybe less heartbroken when Meghan realizes that Jessica is making a list of people criticizing her now so she can get payback later. Now sources tell Page Six that Meghan has been wary of Jessica for a while, and Meghan doesn’t like how Jessica has profited off their connection:

Meghan Markle’s friendship with Jessica Mulroney was already on the outs before the stylist was criticized last week for her tone-deaf “white privilege” remarks, a source told Page Six. The pair had been long-term pals since meeting in Canada, with Mulroney, 40, introducing the former “Suits” star, 38, to a swanky Toronto social set. But despite giving Mulroney’s three kids a starring role in her 2018 Windsor Castle wedding to Britain’s Prince Harry, Markle has increasingly felt that her friend was “benefiting” from her position as royal BFF and stylist, sources say.

The white privilege “row has really given Meghan the excuse she was waiting for to cut Jess off for good,” one source said.

Since the royal wedding, Mulroney has won TV gigs on “Good Morning America” and her own reality show, “I Do, Redo.” She was canned from both shows last week following her racially charged clash with lifestyle blogger Sasha Exeter, with sources saying she wound up in a “flood of tears” after losing her morning show spot, a TV source said. And while she started off helping Markle pick her clothes, Markle has now forged her own relationships with top design houses such as Givenchy and Stella McCartney.

“I don’t know what the tipping point was, but Jess has been on the outs for some time,” said another source. “Their friendship is definitely not what it was. And really, how can you have such a close friendship when one person is basically making a career out of the friendship?”

As reported, Mulroney is one of baby Archie’s godparents, which will make matters more difficult.

[From Page Six]

When it’s framed like that, I kind of understand how Meghan could “cut off” Jessica, if that’s what she did. First of all, Meghan is absolutely the kind of person to cut people off – she’s shown with her first husband and her trashy Markle relatives that she’s more than willing to cut ties with anyone. Yet, it didn’t seem in character for Meghan to end a friendship with Jessica without at least talking to her first. But if Meghan was already feeling iffy, if she already thought Jessica was doing too much by “profiting” from that connection, yeah. Meghan’s gonna cut her off.

Jessica Mulroney makes an appearance at GMA

Meghan Duchess of Sussex makes a visit to Johannesburg, South Africa!

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Backgrid and Getty.

Related stories

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

171 Responses to “Page Six: Duchess Meghan & Jessica Mulroney have ‘been on the outs for some time’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Als Em says:

    This is Page Six. Why are we taking what they say as gospel.

    • truthSF says:

      Right?! Page Six is the American version of The Sun/DailyMail! When it comes to H&M, everything they report is bullshit! They have no access to them at all!

    • trace_smiles says:

      To say she was looking for the opportunity to cut her loose is ridiculous – didn’t Meghan and Harry have Archie staying with Jessica in Canada while they went back to the UK for the bad biatch tour a few months ago? No way would they leave their child with someone they don’t trust implicitly while they were in another country. I call BS on this one.

      • Nola says:

        I agree 100%. The fact that Jessica Mulroney was watching Archie in Canada while they were in the UK speaks volumes about their trust level. I don’t believe Page 6 on this one.

      • ShazBot says:

        @trace I think the reporting it was Jessica was just the British media making it up. Jess lives in Toronto and Archie was, presumably, in Victoria where they were living. Those cities are a 5 hour plane ride away from each other. It’s possible one or the other flew to the city, but they also have a Nanny, and Doria could have also come up…it just felt like the media was grabbing random Canadian names from the air.
        I’m not saying none of this is true, but it does show we actually know very little about what goes on with the Sussexes.

      • CAP N' CRUNCH says:

        Archie was not staying with Jessica in Vancouver. Jessica was in Toronto this whole time. She wanted us to think she was staying with Archie.

      • Nic919 says:

        We don’t actually know that she went to Vancouver to be with Archie. They have a nanny who is with him so it’s more likely that he stayed with the nanny as opposed to having an adult he sees on occasion just cross the country for a few days.

      • Helen says:

        No, that was was the tabloids reported. Don’t people know by now that NONE of these people have any actual clue what’s going on in Harry and Meghans lives?

      • backyard mogul says:

        Jessica barely saw her own kids this winter, she was off filming her show. No clue why anyone would think she would stay home to babysit Archie.

      • Jaded says:

        First of all Meghan, Harry and Archie were not in Vancouver, they were on Vancouver Island, in Saanich, a suburb of greater Victoria. Second, there is no proof other than conjecture that Archie stayed with the Mulroneys while mom and dad went to England. It wouldn’t make sense to dump their baby with a bunch of people he doesn’t know rather than have the continuity of staying in Saanich with a nanny he DOES know and possibly Doria. I live in Victoria and while they were here we islanders were VERY protective of them, their neighbours going so far as to chase away the paps when they got too close and shooing them out of local stores and restaurants, so access to knowing where they were and what they were doing was strictly policed.

        There has been no proof that the Mulroneys are Archie’s godparents either, only more conjecture. Furthermore, Page Six is a bunch of made-up crap and the American equivalent of the Daily Fake so you have to take what they print with a very large grain of salt.

        As for the strain on her relationship with Jessica? I’m sure all of us who have been “tainted by association” by someone who does something that awful would reconsider the friendship and find an honest, balanced way of dealing with the situation. I had to cut someone out of my life many years ago who had been a good friend but had become extremely troublesome. People wondered why I was always giving her the benefit of the doubt and I finally realized that she was causing rifts in my other friendships so I ended things with her. I’m sure that’s what Meghan is considering.

    • whateveryousay says:

      Agreed. And we still don’t know who the godparents are so what is Page Six going on about?

      • NatureLover says:

        @ Jaded, I completely agree. No one knows who Archies god parents are and Page Sox is a slug mag hoping to slug crap on the walls to see what will stick!! As for where they were staying, I am so delighted that all of you stuck together to protect them!! As usual, everyone has known how wonderful and caring how Canadians are, and this cements your validation!! I love Canada, but I have only been in B.C.! I was tickled with joy when I spotted all of the wilderness crossings as we drove to Banff!! And everyone we encountered at Lake Louise and the Natural Parks were extremely charming and kind!

    • Golly Gee says:

      Most of their Meghan and Harry stories are directly linked to the Daily Mail (so total BS), though this one isn’t. Still think it’s BS.

    • I am Mimi says:

      And if this IS true, I don’t think it makes Meghan look good. I Stan for Meghan, but running to a tabloid, about a proven friend, is not a good thing, even if they were already on the outs.

      • Enny says:

        Whether the reporting is true or not, Meghan is truly between a rock and a hard place here. If she doesn’t disassociate from Jessica (at least publicly), that’s a bad look for obvious reasons. If she does, knowing how petty and vindictive this whole situation (and many anecdotes over the years) have shown Jessica to be, Meghan has to worry about Jessica being called as a witness in her trial against the British tabs (as they’ve said they would to prove that Meghan colluded with her friends to leak the contents of her letter to TM).

      • GuestWho says:

        Do you honestly believe that Meghan would “run to a tabloid?” Why would she start now? Especially a Rupert Murdoch tabloid. It makes no sense.

    • Lua says:

      Exactly. I know everyone WANTS this to be true, but I doubt it. They would have gone to People. You don’t just can a friend you trust enough to include in your wedding, name a godparent, and watch your infant while out of the country, without serious interventions.

  2. Em says:

    Yeah, I think this is another example of the press indirectly using their articles to tell Meghan what to do. I’m sorry but Jessica wasn’t racist in my opinion. She was just being high school mean. She would have done the same to any other woman in the light of the situation regardless of her skin color, the blm movement just amplified things. I don’t think Meghan will cut Jess off, she’s godmother to her daughter I think. Jessica has learnt her lesson and will hopefully stop being a karen. We may never see them publicly together but I’m sure they’ll still be friends. Meanwhile I don’t know why Murdoch Corp keeps stalking Meghan and Harry from the sun to page six to New York post, they should leave them alone.

    • Alissa says:

      I agree that I think this was more about her being comfortable throwing her weight around and she would have treated anyone like that. but I disagree that Megan will still be friends with her, and also don’t think anyone being a godparent will really have any bearing over whether they stay friends. anyone who treats people like that and puts on a very different face publicly is going to be like that. she’s not going to magically become a different person.

    • Emily says:

      I agree as well. Jessica was triggered by her white fragility and emboldened by not only her white privilege but her power and money. It was clear to me that Jessica has done this before to many people (she did it to Sasha with such ease). Sasha wasn’t targeted for her race but because she was talking about race in a way that made Jessica feel defensive. I don’t *think* that makes Jessica racist, but she clearly has work to do. And she isn’t a nice person.

      • Margles says:

        You realize that displaying white fragility and taking advantage of white privilege is racist right? Racism isn’t just cartoon KKK monsters.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        I think Jessica is extremely racist.

      • Zazu says:

        When we teach anti-racism we always emphasize the difference between individual racism (card carrying kkk member who hates anyone from a racialized group) and systemic racism (in which white individuals benefit from having power within social institutions and reproduce that power in a way that oppresses racialized groups).

        White privilege and fragility = maintaining systemic racism. Benefiting from unearned advantage due to being white, and keeping that privilege by being a Karen (or Jessica Mulroney).

        All white people are systemically racist and contribute to maintaining their unearned advantage, and othering racialized people (like microagressions), unless they unlearn these social norms and actively ally themselves to decolonize society.

        But not all white people are individually bigoted and prejudicial towards black people and people of colour, aka, Trump, Steve Miller, and alt right white supremacists.

    • Cerceau says:

      I don’t care whether she intended to be racist or not, or whether she would act the same way to a white woman. Her actions were, in effect, racist. She attempted to wield her privilege as a rich, white, powerful woman against a black woman with less power. Her actions took place within a system and society that gives her immense privilege and power, partially due to her whiteness. We will never know what her intentions were, but denying that the racism in the situation is ignoring that we live in a racist society.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Cerceau – thank you! People keep saying “she wasn’t racist, but she used her white privilege.” That IS being racist.

        We really need to step away from the idea that since Jessica has been a bully to other people, that racism wasn’t a factor here. Racism is part of why Jessica thought she had the power in this situation.

      • Canadi-Anne says:

        Cerceau: I back this 100%!

      • BayTampaBay says:

        I think Jessica is extremely racist and has shown her true colors. I am now beginning to seriously considered the previous allegations (Daily Fail, Harry Markle and Blind Gossip) that Jessica was “merching” off Meghan for her own personal gain.

      • goopygossip says:

        this 100%. it was 100% her white privilege that she weaponized. and it’s a lesson to all of us to examine our our privilege and check ourselves.

    • Elizabeth says:

      She attacked Sasha (a black woman) in response to a Black Lives Matter post. She used her status and power, as a rich, well-connected white woman, to go after and bully and threaten a black woman, *in the context of resenting a Black Lives Matter post.*

      Racism is right there. It’s absolutely part of what she did. I don’t know why you’re trying to deny it or not see it.

      Critical race theory says racism is mundane, it’s everywhere. It’s an inescapable part of life.

      • osito says:

        Why is everyone so interested in hair splitting when defining racism right now of all times? I truly don’t understand why anyone cares to this degree if she targeted Exeter because she is black or if she targeted Exeter because Exeter was making a valid point about inherent bias. Mulroney’s actions and arguments were wrong on many levels, at least one of which was a racist one — the “I have a black friend” square on the racism bingo card satisfies, but I *would think* threatening anyone over their stance on BLM qualifies. It’s microaggression, gaslighting, (“I’m so sorry”/“I’m suing you”), and weaponizing white feminine discomfort, and if we can’t just get on with the fact that all that sh-t is racist, then we’re not getting the necessary work done.

      • Nic919 says:

        We have to move away from thinking that racism is just tossing around the n word and nothing else. Her actions were racist. And white people have a really hard time admitting that because it makes them reflect on all the things they have done that would be racist as well.

      • Prayer Warrior says:

        @Nic919 yes, what you say. Here’s my thought … We don’t name call. We agree name-calling is wrong. You are stupid versus You did a stupid thing. There is a distinct difference. So how about: she did a very racist thing. Because you are right: “white people have a really hard time admitting that because it makes them reflect on all the things they have done that would be racist as well.” I’m there, for sure, and that feels icky upon honest reflection. Not who I wish to be.
        BLM is finally being heard SERIOUSLY. To the point where whites are getting defensive. “white people have a really hard time admitting that because it makes them reflect on all the things they have done that would be racist as well.. I think all humans (in fact, this is true throughout the animal world) shun “different”. It’s in our DNA ~ the challenge in a civilized society is to rise above. To not fear and not shat on “different” but to learn how to embrace, and honour “different”. Practice civility……We are messed up humans.

      • osito says:

        @Prayer Warrior — I see what you’re trying to say here, but I urge you to think about how dismissive and condescending your argument sounds. Calling someone racist when they behave in racist ways and believe racist things is not “name calling.” That makes the legitimate grievances of PoC (like me!) sound childish and immature. You agree that the current conversations and anti-racist actions makes white people defensive — imagine living an entire lifetime in a white supremacist society. Stop tone policing people of color and continue to do your work. It’s an offensive obfuscation of the issues when you refocus attention on white feelings rather than on how PoC feel when confronted with racist white people. You say you’re trying, so I’m going to assume you meant no harm, but your comment is emblematic of the “hair splitting” problem I referred to in mine and it’s upsetting.

    • Lady D says:

      “Jessica has learnt her lesson.” Awfully optimistic of you, @Em. I think she’s done this before, a lot, and she is absolutely going to do it again. She thinks it’s her right and what’s worse is she also enjoys doing it. I really doubt Sasha Exeter is going to be her last victim. She already has a list.

      • Jaded says:

        Leopards don’t change their spots and Jessica isn’t going to come out of this in a Hallelujah moment thinking “I’ve seen the light and am a changed person!”. If anything it will make her more firmly entrenched in her mean-girling, snotty white privilege and superiority, and she’ll be gunning for the people who didn’t support her. After this debacle I think Meghan will drop her like a cold turd.

      • Still_Sarah says:

        @ Lady D : Exactly. This story about Jessica reminds me of the Rihanna lyrics “Don’t tell me you’re sorry when you’re not. When we know you’re only sorry you got caught”. JM isn’t anywhere near feeling the amount of pain a person needs to feel before they decide to change the way they think about things IMO.
        @ Em : No, I don’t believe JM has learned her lesson unfortunately.

  3. Becks1 says:

    LOL, I mean, maybe?

    I think Meghan definitely always appreciated how Jessica kept her mouth shut. Yes, she made a point of being Meghan Markle’s best friend, but Meghan went to Jessica’s house in Toronto and no one knew about it, its just an assumption that Jessica is the godmother, etc. The only time I thought she really walked a fine line was when she went to England to visit Archie and posted a few pics from the airport and from some store near Windsor. But other than that, at least for the past few years, as Meghan was in that den of vipers known as the royal family, she probably appreciated the relative silence from Jessica more than her using M’s name bothered her, if that makes sense. Maybe now, that she (M) is out of the UK, the silence means less to her and things like being a huge bully matter more.

    Like I said a few days ago – if Meghan and Jessica’s friendship is over, we likely wont know one way or the other. We haven’t seen them together since the wedding. Its not like we are going to get an announcement from a spokesperson (looking at you, Page Six.)

    • Nic919 says:

      Don’t the godparents need to be Anglican? If so then neither Jessica or Ben fit the bill. He’s catholic and she’s Jewish.

      • Becks1 says:

        Good point, I have no idea but maybe? In some religions the godparent just has to be “something” and I think some require only one godparent to be of that particular faith. Its juts one more thing that was speculated but we have no idea.

      • Prairiegirl says:

        Meh. All Harry’s godparents are Anglican but one of WIlliam’s godfathers is King Constantine II of Greece. I’m not sure religious affiliation is as important as proximity to the Royal family.

      • Nic919 says:

        I would think having to be Christian would be required even if the denomination if a bit different. Greek Orthodox involves a fight between popes and a split in the Middle Ages, but there is quite a difference between Judaism and Christianity.

      • Becks1 says:

        Alright I looked it up, just so we know lol.

        In the Anglican church, the godparents should be baptized, but they don’t have to be Anglican. So strictly speaking, a Muslim or Hindu cant be a godparent in the Anglican church. But according to the BBC in 2013, different parishes enforce that differently, and the church is considering moving to the term “special friend” instead of godparent to reflect the changing roles of godparents in today’s world.

        Now we know!

    • Glorificus says:

      Hi! Ex Anglican priest here. I can confirm Becks1 is right, strictly you have to be a baptised person to be a godparent in the CofE. However different priests (and it’s really up to the priests not the parishes) enforce it different ways – some places insist you’re a practicing Christian, some don’t, and some are happy to have people of other faiths even if it’s not really legal. I would say that the vows (submitting to Christ, rejecting the devil) are very specific and some people don’t feel comfortable with them.

      The clergy who minister to the RF will have to stick to the rules to a certain extent for this stuff, but as you can imagine it’s way more based on class than faith.

      Tldr: I don’t think JM is a godmother.

      • Nic919 says:

        Thanks for the info!

      • Erinn says:

        LOVE this comment, and especially the TLDR haha. That must have been an interesting job.

      • Glorificus says:

        Awww thanks @nic919 and @erinn! That’s sweet, I’m usually a lurker so I get nervous posting!

        Yeah it was a fascinating job, but one where it was hard to be a feminist queer woman, and eventually it was time to do something else. The way the RF interacts with clergy is really interesting – I got some insight into it where I worked. The change of procession for the commonwealth service for example would have been THE MOST STRESSFUL for the clergy and vergers who were trying to organise it!

  4. StartupSpouse says:

    Not sure whether this is a credible source, but if so, then good on MM.

    I really like Meghan because she is seems smart, articulate, and authentic. She’s tried to do with her royal role what any of us daydream about if we had that platform – choosing causes that have meaning and advancing those forward.

    Unfortunately, her friendship with JM undermines her messaging. Long-lasting friendships go through ups and downs, people make mistakes, and people can learn and grow. But from what Lainey said, I don’t think that is what is going to happen here with JM. It looks like, at her earliest opportunity, JM is going to again use her white privilege as a weapon against anyone she feels crossed her. MM should wash her hands of that mess.

    • Becks1 says:

      It’s definitely not a credible source. no one from the Sussex camp would talk to Page 6, and Jessica certainly isn’t going to run to Page Six and talk about how Meghan is no longer her friend.

      • Love says:

        Agreed. Also, in Jess’s now deleted comment on Sasha’s page, she said something along the lines of a “very close friend” going through a hard time due to race… if they weren’t friendly she wouldn’t have phrased it that way

  5. Alissa says:

    I wonder how accurate this is. it seems kind of convenient to come out with a report saying that they were already ending their friendship. but I can also see not wanting to be friends with someone who’s profiting off of their friendship with you. I do think it’s funny that they think her being one of Archie’s godparents means that it will make things more complicated. it definitely won’t.

    • Soupie says:

      Came here to say this.

    • El says:

      But when Meghan was profiting off of her relationship with Jessica, it was ok? Isn’t it commonly accepted that she even met Harry thanks to Jessica (perhaps indirectly), who introduced her into the Canadian socialite society? There was a time when the roles were reversed and I seriously doubt Jessica was a sweetheart back then and suddenly changed now. Sounds like Meghan was more than willing to overlook problematic behavior when it was expedient, but now that the roles are reversed, it’s a deal breaker?
      I don’t know, I like Meghan, and it’s not like you can’t encounter 5-6 toxic people in your life that deserve to be left behind, but it does seem to be a pattern, so I’m not sure for how much longer I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. Not that she cares, lol. I know I will be eaten alive for saying this.
      And yes, I’m fully cognizant that this is all conjecture, if not a lie. So, when I say “Meghan”, I realize I’m talking about persona, and not a person. I’m not under any illusion that I know the real Meghan, so I don’t need that reminder. I think a lot of Meghan’s defenders do, though.

      • Sofia says:

        Okay but who are these 5 to 6 people you refer to? If you say the Markles then she had no choice in being related to them. It’s not her fault that she shares their DNA and she didn’t ask to be born. And she barely had a relationship with them in the first place, partly because they’re a bit older than her.

        Other than her ex-agent and that one childhood friend, Meghan has kept close friends – including ones from uni/college. Her ex’s mother even defends her on Twitter sometimes.

        People are very quick to write “think pieces” on Meghan’s “social climbing” and yet those same people stay silent/never comment on Cambridge articles with similar size think pieces on Kate. Wonder why…

      • GuestWho says:

        Who are the 5 or 6 people? I think we can lump her grotesque family into one congeeled lump of toxicity. So who else has Meghan ever referred to as toxic? The “pattern” was presented to you by the tabloid press and the racist Me__it losers on twitter – there is nothing about her life before she married that suggests she leaves people behind more often than any other adult.

        And nobody is going “eat you alive” for this. Who would bother?

      • ABritGuest says:

        I’m curious how Meghan profited of Jessica. She already had her role on suits when moving to Toronto. She was approached by UN directly for that ambassador role because of her blog (and no doubt her actress profile). I had read it was her ex Cory that had the contacts& was the one who might have introduced her to Jessica.

        It’s always been rumored that Mischa (who said she met Meghan at art basel in Miami) & an ex of one of Harry’s friends OR Violet von westenholz (who was doing PR for Ralph Lauren which Meghan wore to Wimbledon week she met Harry) whose father is Prince Charles friend, was the matchmaker. Jessica’s name hasn’t been in the ring as matchmaker as far as I’m aware.

        Guessing Jessica has good fashion contacts in Canada so may have helped Meghan get the Reitman brand role? Could Jessica have connected Meghan with charities like World Vision? Apart from that not sure how exactly Jessica helped Meghan’s profile.

      • L4frimaire says:

        @aBritGuest, some good points. The only reason Meghan was even in Toronto was because of her role on Suits, so she was out there already and promoting her show, and getting press. Maybe they did meet through mutual friends or a business arrangement and just clicked. It’s not like Jessica made Meghan’s career. Did they even work on charity projects together? I can’t imaging Jessica hooking up USO tours. I just think it isn’t as linear as people would like to think and Meghan was working very hard to advance her own career and interests.

      • El says:

        The 5 or 6 people that were reported on (and I only read about Meghan on this site, so this is what I’ve seen):
        1. Her high school friend
        2. Her first husband
        3. Her latest boyfriend
        4. Her Dad
        5. Other family members (I separate them from her Dad because her Dad is her blood relative and a direct relation, whereas his kids from another marriage are a different deal, there could be a lot of bad blood there from the start).

        And I don’t even remember anything about her ex-agent, but if there was something, that would be 6 and Jessica will be 7, if any of this is true.

      • OS says:

        @EL I don’t know too many people who keep in touch with ex husbands/boyfriends so counting those as people she cut off seems like a reach.

      • Sofia says:

        So how many exes and friends have you stayed in touch with? Be honest now. If you haven’t, should I start implying you’re the problem?

        Just say you don’t like Meghan and go. I would respect you for being honest instead of this bullshit of “I like her but”. 9/10 when people say that: they don’t like her and just want to protect themselves from being called out.

      • GuestWho says:

        @EL – well isn’t that a ridiculous list.
        1) Her “friend” from high school was one of the first people who sold her out – which doesn’t say much for that woman. Doesn’t seem like the kind of person you’d want to keep in your life.
        2) Her first husband – who stays in touch with their ex husbands if they don’t have children to tie them together?
        3) Her latest boyfriend – who has said some incredibly nice things about Meghan – as has his mom.
        4) Her dad – he’s an abusive POS who tried to ruin her wedding and then spent the next year lying his face off and selling personal mementos.
        5) Her other family members – she never had a relationship with those pieces of trash.

        As people go through their lives, people organically move in and out of our lives. This is another (poor) attempt at “othering” Meghan for living life normally.

  6. Mohbard says:

    Oh my this thread is about to become interesting let me grab my popcorn 🍿 🍿 🍿

  7. P says:

    Well do it Meghan, cut her off. I couldnt be friends with someone who threatens the livelihood of a single mom advocating for BLM.

  8. Nic919 says:

    No one from Meghan’s camp spoke to Page Six. Basically someone read comments here and elsewhere and speculated as to what is happening. It could be accurate but it is doubtful we will ever know.

  9. taylor says:

    Riiight. I don’t think so. I used to think PageSix was credible, but they have been pretty poor in the coverage of Meghan, often just regurgitating things said by the British tabloids. It’s pretty crazy that even when Meghan’s laying low, stories are constantly being created about her. I imagine it’s really frustrating, but the BM ironically does a lot to keep her relevant.

    • Margles says:

      I don’t know. This is a pretty favorable article for Meghan. Cuts off the whole, “Why is she friends with this horrible woman?” questions by answering, “She was realizing JM was horrible and now is finally cutting ties.”

  10. Whatever says:

    Friendship ebbs and flows.

    I can them see them cooling off a bit and giving each other space but I don’t think MM will terminate the relationship.

    They have a lot of history and Jessica was trusted to watch over Archie in Canada when MM had to tie up loose ends in London,

    • Margles says:

      Was she? Vancouver and Toronto are not exactly close to each other.

      • Lady D says:

        I think, not positive, but flying from Van, you stop in Toronto before heading overseas. They could have easily picked up a connecting flight from Pearson Intl.

      • Jaded says:

        They were on Vancouver Island in Victoria. So there’s an added layer of changing planes in Vancouver unless you get a direct flight, but they’re few and far-between. The Mulroneys live a good 45 minutes from Pearson airport so factor in that travel time. It makes utterly no sense to go to the time and trouble to lug a baby that far and dump him in a household with people and nannies he doesn’t know, it would be upsetting to his routine to force him through a long-ass day of travel then surround him by a bunch of strangers. Dollars to donuts he was here on Vancouver Island with his own nanny and possibly Doria. Meghan and Harry don’t strike me as the kind of people who would put Archie through such a stressful situation.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Jaded – agreed, especially when you consider Meghan was not in the UK that long. In January she was there, what, three days? and in March she was there for less than a week. She wouldn’t have taken Archie to Toronto when they have a nanny (and like you said maybe Doria). And do we know if they were already in LA when they came back in March? if not they moved really soon after that.

        I guess its possible Jessica stayed at their house in January but again, I just don’t see why it would be practical.

    • Melody Calder says:

      Megan profited off being Jessica’s friend for YEARS. Petty to drop her for same thing (not blm issue)
      Also, most of her friends in la would be doing same thing right now, only without the history they have, so I’m not sure I buy this.

      • Jaded says:

        It’s “Meghan”, not “Megan”. Furthermore how did she “profit off” (it’s actually “profit from”) Jessica’s friendship? Meghan was already actively in the acting/media world. Jessica was a mere “stylist” before HER association with Meghan gave her leeway into TV and fashion influencing. Then when Meghan met Harry Jessica was the one who was gleefully rubbing her hands together imagining all the business and social contacts she could make by being royal-adjacent. I think you have this one bass-ackwards.

  11. Rae says:

    The way I view it is this: Page Six needs to be taken with a pinch of salt, as I doubt anyone’s talking to them, they’re no better than our rags. However, I absolutely would understand why Meghan would want to separate herself from Jessica and I would do the same.

    • Abby says:

      Agreed. I think this is speculation. But I also think Meghan will take a look at this friendship.

  12. Sofia says:

    Page Six? May as well believe the DM at this rate.

    Jessica won’t be cut off completely but she’ll go from best friend to friend and then later acquaintance. She’ll know some things but will no longer be part of the inner circle. As for the using the friendship to get ahead, it probably didn’t bother Meghan too much as other royal adjacents have been profiting of their royal connections for years but as long as she was “discreet” about it, Meghan probably didn’t care too much. But Jessica was not hence why she was constantly called out.

  13. The Duchess says:

    If Meghan has cut her off, then good for her. JM is a social-climbing leech, who has profited off being ‘Meghan’s Friend’ for years. While I don’t think Jessica was racist, I do think she uses her white privilege as a weapon to steer her career and to further her own image. I’m glad she’s been called out for it. Page 6 isn’t a reliable source, so I would take this whole situation with a pinch of salt. The Sussexes wouldn’t even give a comment to the likes of Page 6 and Jessica would definitely not run to the tabloids to confirm her friendship with Meghan has come to an end. However, if Meghan has come to this conclusion, then she’s absolutely made the right decision.

    • Flamingo says:

      I think we have to remember that they have both profited off of each other. When Meghan was a TV actress, the connections that Jessica offered were very valuable. Now that Meghan is royal, Jessica’s connection to Meghan is very valuable. I don’t really think one was leeching off the other, they both gained status from their relationship, just at different points.

      • The Duchess says:

        Now that you put it like that, I do see your point. I just wish Jessica was more careful with what she says and how she acts, considering her close friendship with Meghan. The British Press are like sharks circling, whilst waiting to strike. They won’t focus on Jessica’s own individual actions, they will focus on Meghan being connected to her and spin it to their own tune. All of this just concerns me because I don’t want Meghan’s name dragged through the mud any more than it already has.

  14. AprilMay says:

    Yeah I’m not buying it. A couple of months ago she was still trusting her enough to leave Archie with her when they went back to the uk but all of a sudden they’ve been having problems for a while. Not buying it. I’m sure this has caused issues now but not buying that something was wrong before that.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      @AprilMay – It has NOT been confirmed that Archie was left with Jessica while the Sussexes were in England for their Farewell Tour.

    • Jaded says:

      It is conjecture that Archie was with the Mulroneys – do you honestly think either Meghan or Harry would drag the poor mite across the country and dump him with a bunch of people he doesn’t know when he had a nanny and possibly Doria to look after him on Vancouver Island? It’s a long, arduous trip for a baby. Think about it….neither of them would dream of putting him through that.

  15. Alexandria says:

    Did she really look after Archie in Canada or was that gossip?

    • Sofia says:

      Omid said she did but even he’s gotten things wrong before. Yeah he knows more about the Sussexes than your average royal reporter but like I said: he’s gotten things wrong before. One incident I remember is when he said Doria would be in the Christmas card picture and she wasn’t.

      • Nic919 says:

        There has been reference to Jessica being Omid’s source so if that is the case, then he would be relying on her version of events.
        It doesn’t makes sense to cross the country to watch a child who already has a nanny and a grandmother who is much closer.

    • MsIam says:

      No one knows. I checked on that and all I could find was a bunch of “It is believed” articles in the tabs. More than likely he stayed home with the nanny or her mother or some other friend. If the whole point of leaving him behind was fears of flying during the pandemic then it wouldn’t make sense for them to fly with him to Toronto for two days and then back to Vancouver.

      • carmen says:

        Exactly, MsIam. Also, the fact that JM outsources the care of her own kids to nannies makes it unlikely that she would taken on childcare duties herself!

  16. Leslie says:

    Jessica looks like a budget Christina Auguilera during her Stripped album era.

    • Sarah says:

      THANK YOU. I thought the look was familiar but couldn’t place it.

    • Princess Caroline says:

      Omg…yaaaaaaas! 😂😂

      Honest question, what is happening with her jawline? Why does she have such pronounced jowls? Is that her fillers?!

      • Sienna says:

        I don’t think it’s fillers, they are mostly in her lips and mid face. I think she’s over botoxed her masseter muscles. Helps with TMJ and slims the face but can also leave laxity in the jowls. Not certain but that’s my guess, she looks like she’s had a ton of other work done as well.

  17. MJM says:

    I don’t believe page 6 or anyone except the involved parties knows what is going on. I do know this: Meghan is not the same person that she was before she met and married Harry and when people change often their relationships change as well. Meghan has become a wife and mother and endured horrendous abuse that has had an effect on her mental health. Speaking from experience, when this happens to you, you change. You see the world differently and you don’t trust as freely as you once did. Sometimes it clears the fog and you see things in people you were blind to or ignored before. Just saying.

  18. ABritGuest says:

    Don’t think it’s fair to say Meghan cut off trashy relatives. Her half siblings are older& they weren’t raised together. When news of Meghan’s relationship emerged they said they hadn’t seen or spoken to her or each other in years. They hadn’t seen their father in years too. Markles just seemed a distant family before their tabloid shenanigans. I’m guessing Markle senior is now cut off though.

    I don’t find the press reliable on her friendship circle. When she first married in press used to say Meghan had no friends& had dumped old pals for celebs. One RR said on TV they doubted she had enough friends for the anonymous people article. So eg them saying Jessica is a godmother or reporting they left Archie with her in Vancouver is meh to me. I’m pretty sure godparents would have to be Anglican& think Jessica is Jewish. And they were reporting the Sussexes were still in Canada when they were already in LA so doubt they know intricacies of their childcare arrangements.

    Think this article is based on blog chatter. It’s not hard to imagine Meghan being upset to be dragged into this row& used as the ‘black friend’ racism deflect card. Ultimately press would love Jessica to be cut off for nefarious reasons. They have gone after her family& projects. They will go after her friendships too.

    • Sofia says:

      Some people are also hoping the friendship breaks so Jessica will go scorched earth and spill Meghan’s tea. Which won’t happen because Jessica will want to “protect” whatever she has left and Meghan isn’t to blame for this mess – Jessica is.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      @ABritGuest – Godparents must be Christian for Protestant children. Greek Orthodox and Mormons will suffice but not Jewish.

      • Some chick says:

        Religion is so weird. If the point of godparents is for someone to care for the child if the parents can’t, I’d think the criteria would be fitness to step in as a parent.

      • Kkat says:

        My older boy was baptized in the CoE, his father is British.
        On his dad’s side the god parents also belong to the CoE. On my side my sister and her husband are his God parents. My bil is Jewish my sister is no religion.
        The church didn’t care what the godparents were as much as they cared about my husband and I. We had to go to a 4 week class to make sure of us.
        The God parents had to agree to make sure he was raised with a relationship with God.

        This kind of God parents is purely for religious purposes.

        @somechick these people would not become guardians of the kid if the parents died. They are to be guardians of the soul.

  19. Linda says:

    I don’t think she would cut her off for using her association with her to promote her brand. She probably expected it because that is the world they travel in. They all use each other. It doesn’t mean they aren’t also friends.

  20. Aurora says:

    They still have no idea who Archie’s godparents are. It’s funny to watch these tabloids keep naming different people.

    This article is about getting Jessica to talk. The implication that she’s out of Meghan’s circle could damage her social standing and prompt a denial. The tabloids can then criticize Meghan for not dropping her problematic friend.

    • Mtec says:

      Exactly! Thank you for seeing through this bs! I can’t believe so many are buying that this is true. Maybe it is, but as H & M have warned, don’t listen to “sources” pretending to know anything about them. I highly doubt Page Six has any insider sources.

      Also Cambridge stans love to criticize Meghan for “dropping” people, so whether she does or not they and the tabloids are always gonna find a way to blame her for something.

  21. Kittylouise says:

    Can we please have posts about Jessica Mulroney every day, because I’m personally finding laughing at her hideous outfits and make up really cheering.

    She really isn’t very stylish Is she, bless her.

    • Sarah says:

      Seconded. Her clothes are amazingly bad. Money does not buy you style. I often hate what Chloe Sevingy wears but she’s owning her look, this is just BAD.

    • Guest says:

      I know right. The people who think she has cute, fun outfits and think she has any style.. must be wearing ugly outfits themselves. I’d hardly call what JM does “stylish.” She has 2 looks – those tight mermaid dresses and bright, cheap suits. Meh. The fake lips and boobs just make everything more tacky.

      • Marjorie says:

        Plus look at the ensemble she stuck her husband in – black shirt, white pants, brown jacket, black socks, white shoes. He looks like an elderly snowbird shopping at a Publix supermarket in Sarasota.

      • Some chick says:

        @Marjorie: sick burn of the week.

    • Jaded says:

      IKR? Both Jessica Barbie and her Ken Doll husband look utterly ridiculous all the time.

      @Marjorie: “He looks like an elderly snowbird shopping at a Publix supermarket in Sarasota.” OMG that’s the funniest thing!!!

  22. ainsley says:

    You can see the dynamic in the relationship in that last picture. Meghan looks a little put out at being photographed whereas Jessica looks like she is absolutely eating up the attention from sitting with her.

  23. Valiantly Varnished says:

    I hope this is true for Meghan’s sake. Not because of optics but because she simply doesn’t need yet another toxic person profiting off her name.

    One of the things I respect and relate to the most about Meghan is her willingness to cut toxic people out of her life. Ive done it myself. Many times. Like her I cut my toxic father out of my life. And Ive cut toxic friends out as well. And you know what? The kore you do it the easier it gets. And so I hope this is true and good riddance to Jessica.

    • Savannah says:

      @VV me too. I didn’t grow up with a lot of great guidance about who to have in my life and not. It took a bit of therapy but now I’m super selective. I’ve endured a few betrayals and disappointments but I don’t feel guilty about making good choices for myself. I had to cut out a friend a few years ago who, while she had many qualities, was a complete emotional vampire.

  24. AMM says:

    They may have grown apart, which happens when dynamics in a relationship change. When they met, Meghan was an up and coming actress in a new city where Jessica was the It Girl. And then Meghan became one of the most famous people on earth and went through hell and back. Jessica is now relying on Meghans connections instead of vice versa. I wonder if there isn’t some obligation there from Meghan. Jessica took a chance on a new girl and has been fairly loyal throughout everything, so it’s probably hard for her to completely cut her off even if they aren’t on the same page anymore.

  25. Dizzy says:

    Meghan became Jessica’s friend because she wanted to be in with the Toronto high society crowd (lol, I find this funny because I’m from Toronto …Toronto and high society! Weird). Read the articles of Shinan Govani. He’s written great articles about this Toronto connection.
    Meghan doesn’t need her Toronto connections anymore … she continually reinvents herself.

    • Olenna says:

      You’re trolling with that mugxit reinvention comment and Govani is a bitter little hack.

      • Whatever says:

        Why is it social climbing?

        What’s wrong with wanting to make friends when you move to a new city?

      • ABritGuest says:

        Exactly. Shinan the one who was cheering on Piers Morgan’s misogynoir rants on Meghan& who said in that Tatler piece that when he learnt Meghan was mixed race- that she didn’t ‘read that way’? Horrible.

      • Guest says:

        Hi racist! Hack? He comes from a wealthy family and decided to be one of those do nothing society columnists attending parties every night. I guess Someone is in a racist huff because he said some negative things about the Duchess. Try not to be jealous of rich POC. It’s not a good look.

      • Olenna says:

        @Guest is a troll. Please do not engage with it.

    • Nic919 says:

      Govani works for the National Post, formerly owned by Conrad Black, friend of Murdoch and Dump and it is a notorious right wing paper. He is postIng for a crowd that likes to hear that the biracial duchess is a schemer. He didn’t post these stories before she started dating Harry but suddenly there was a narrative to sustain.

    • Jaded says:

      @Dizzy: Shinan Govani is nasty little weasel and Jessica wasn’t “high society”. She was nothing more than a rich little mean girl who married into the Mulroneys. I grew up in Toronto and believe me, she was not well known at all until Meghan. Now stop trolling.

    • L4frimaire says:


    • Rista says:

      Actually, I’m from Toronto too and JM was “high society” (for Toronto). She was a well-known socialite that brought MM under her wing. I’ve been following JM and MM way before Harry and if you read MM’s insta pre-Harry you would have seen that JM was definitely the alpha in that relationship. As for Shinan, I think he works for the Toronto Star now (as a freelancer) and he is deliciously b*tchy and currently going hard after JM.

  26. Priscila says:

    I just came to say I miss speaking about the Tatler debacle…

    CEO Kate, Mummy dearest Carole and Will the Zoom boy will forever have a place in my heart!

  27. Maria says:

    I wouldn’t blame Meghan if she dropped Jessica. She wouldn’t be able to ever trust her again.

  28. Detective says:

    Perhaps JM was one of Scobie’s sources (the way she possibly served as one of the People Mag sources), and when he reported that Archie was staying with Mulroneys, the Sussexes felt JM had crossed a line? Shinan Govani’s read on the JM stuff suggests she was increasingly making worse decisions, especially with regard to social media (late nights up on Insta and such), which could explain why this rift was growing over time as her behavior worsened instead of being a sudden break. I think it would explain a lot about some mixed signals from the Sussexes with regard to privacy if JM was the one dishing at times (for example, info about the baby shower). The fact that many of Meghan’s Toronto connections came through JM means JM has many of the same connections in place as Meghan does…

    (p.s. I too would love to see a follow-up about the Tatler piece. My current theory is it’s aristos on Rose’s side mocking Will for staying with the Kate after the Rose affair. This would explain the portrayal of him as weak and bossed around by the Middletons and Kate and Carole as “not in our class, dear.” Might also explain the recent DM story about QEII “keeping an eye on” Will and Kate so they don’t make the same “mistakes” as other young royals. This was viewed as a dig at the Sussexes, but what if it was a reference to Charles and Diana when they were younger?

  29. Mimi says:

    Page Six is not a reliable source for info on the Sussexes. Pretty sure Meghan is not going to end her friendship with Jessica over this.

  30. kelleybelle says:

    First of all, Meghan didn’t “cut ties” with the Markles, she never HAD ties with them. She never considered them family. The half-sibs have probably seen her twice in 30 years, at gatherings. Secondly, Page Six has no access and doesn’t know sh*t. She and Jessica are close and I doubt Jessica is cut off. And as for “reports” that Jess is godmother to Archie, the godparents were never revealed. Just speculation.

  31. kelleybelle says:

    When the so-called “friends” and “family” betray her and lie to the press about her, yes. Hi Scammy!

  32. Emmitt says:

    1. We don’t know who Archie’s godmother is. It is probably not Jessica (Jewish) so speculating that Meghan will find it hard to drop Jessica because she’s Archie godmother is a waste of time.

    2. I doubt Jessica was watching Archie when they were in Canada because Vancouver & Toronto are on opposite sides of the country. I doubt Jessica flew to Vancouver to watch Archie with she has 3 children of her own and I doubt Meghan dropped off Archie in Toronto. I think Doria and the nanny were watching Archie both times they were in the UK and IMO Archie wasn’t in Canada either time (especially the last time).

    3. I find it hilarious the same people who wag their fingers at Meghan for dropping people are advising her to drop Jessica. I don’t think Meghan will drop Jessica but I don’t think Jessica will be seen in public with Meghan again.

    • kelleybelle says:

      Agree with all of this.

    • Jaded says:

      They actually weren’t in Vancouver – they were on Vancouver Island, near the capital city of Victoria. I live here. So they were even further away from Toronto. Of course their nanny and Doria were watching over Archie – Meghan and Harry don’t strike me as the kind of parents who would put an 8 month old baby through an arduous day of travel then dump him with strangers.

  33. one of the Marys says:

    Independent of this recent scandal I don’t understand the accusations of JM ‘profiting’ from her friendship with MM. I don’t follow her so was she name dropping and blatantly putting it out there? Because isn’t it simply networking and making the most of the opportunity when your profile is raised? What’s the difference between JM and Misha Nonoo (?spelling) ? Misha has been connected to MM and participated in the capsule connection. But Jessica is portrayed as predatory as far as I can tell because people don’t like her

    • Jaded says:

      Jessica had been posting all sorts of pictures and video clips on IG of her with Meghan, of her at the wedding, really show-boating quite obviously. She’s also not a fashion designer of Misha’s stature, she’s an influencer, brand enhancer and TV co-host. Big difference, but as soon as Meghan and Harry got together she was all over the media, Misha wasn’t.

  34. Diamne says:

    As a woman of color myself, I do not question Sasha’s accusation from 1980′s styled, overtanned, budget Christina Aguilara. Aka Jessica.

    However, are there any reciepts from their transaction? I’m just curious.

  35. Danielle says:

    Also Page Six is no better making it seem like well Meghan used Jessica and now she is throwing her away. Racism is not just calling someone the n-word it also shows up in micro aggressions and can be overt and covert.

  36. terresa says:

    By no means am I a ‘body language expert’, but in every photo I see of Meghan and Jessica, Meghan’s eyes do not look like someone who is comfortable having her picture taken. compare that to shots of her launching her capsule collection, cookbook, or attending any of the ‘final tour’ events with Harry and you will see. The eyes have it.

    • David says:

      What kind of observation is that? She loves the camera and it loves her. Girl can smize!

    • goopygossip says:

      disagree. MM is as thirsty as the rest of them. and the camera loves her and she it.

      • LaurenMichelle says:

        Every pic I see of JM & MM together they look like the smug sisters. I wonder how the Mulroney family feels about this hateful, elitist mess. Jessica married into the Mulroney family, and has singlehandedly ruined their name.

      • Becks1 says:

        Wasn’t the Mulroney name already kind of tarnished by the corrupt PM?

      • Nic919 says:

        Brian Mulroney literally took a bag of money as a payoff so yeah the Mulroney name was not viewed well by the general public.

  37. Nyro says:

    Page Six is a Murdoch rag so I take this with a grain of salt. That said, I’ve always been suspicious of JM because I don’t trust regular people who eff up their faces with surgery like that. By regular, I mean non-celebs. There’s literally no reason for a regular person to do that to their perfectly fine face and I think it speaks to a character issue. Disturbingly phony and deep deep insecurity. Yes, it’s judgemental on my part but that’s how I feel. Also, the fact that she’s pretty much parlayed her status as “Meghan Markle’s BFF” into a whole career has always been very shady, imo. That said, whether Meghan wants to stay friends or drop her, that’s her business. But her BLM Karen debacle shows me that JM has no sense, isn’t very smart, and isn’t suited to move in the circles Meghan now moves in. You ever hear of Michelle Obama’s friends making a living off of her and acting a damn fool, threatening people behind the scenes? Of course not.

  38. L4frimaire says:

    I won’t give much credit to Page Six. However, one thing missing from the conversation surrounding this whole controversy is the shift in the balance of power in the relationship. I think when they first met, Jessica was definitely the IT girl, the society intro to Toronto and people who mattered. However, as Meghan upped her career and her humanitarian work, she probably moved beyond that. Obviously dating marrying Prince Harry changed everything and changed Meghan’s life completely. How can that not effect a friendship, especially when one thinks she is a gatekeeper? When someone becomes one of the most famous woman in the world, some of those left behind will feel resentment. Also, of her glam friends, it was Misha Nonoo who was at the SmartSet launch, who gave the interviews in the NYTimes and GMA, whose wedding Meghan attended. I think that is the closer friend from her former life. There has definitely been a shift in her friendship with Jessica. What is curious is that it was one of Meghan’s most prominent and privileged friends who imploded so publicly. They are just very different people. Meghan has been dealing with real problems and complications in her life and some major life changes to put it mildly. Also like us all, she’s watching the country shut down and rise up. We have real structural racial issues, a crucial election, and a pandemic. I think a lot of people overlook the wonkiness of Meghan. She’s a bit nerdy. Yes she’s gorgeous,glamorous and fun, but as mentioned before here, she’s a planner, very deliberative in what she does, and takes her work seriously. She’s not going to let someone else mess it up, and she certainly isn’t going to send indiscreet DMs and threaten people. Not her style. If she was my friend, that would have crossed a line, to lash out like that ,and the fact that she won’t even pretend to do better and let this go. Sometimes you can’t reach someone when they act like that because they are too in their feelings. I don’t know that she’s cut her off, but definitely would throw my hands up and stay out of it.

  39. Whatever says:

    I understand the comment that MM “reinvent herself” is intended to throw shade.

    But what is wrong with being reflective, taking inventory of the people around you and trying to surround yourself with kind and safe people?

    People grow and change over time—that’s normal and healthy.

    Why can’t MM choose how she lives her life?

  40. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    Who’s really driving this? It’s quite crazy from every angle and any article striving to achieve superior knowledge within this so-called drama reads leading and flat. Maybe this Jessica received some well-deserved, long-overdue heat. And maybe her ‘connections’ are stirring pots for agendas and profit. And maybe Meghan is done with her. But everything I’ve read lacks credibility from my perspective.

    • L4frimaire says:

      There is so much hypocrisy in this whole thing. This is ultimately about how white privileged person uses their privilege and connections in the work sphere to try to undermine or derail the career of a person of color, whether it’s Bon Appetite, the NFL, or influencers in Toronto. Hell, the British Royal family did the same thing to Meghan, and she’s still paying for it. How can people not see that? Yet she’s supposed to come out for or against Jessica, and get involved in this? This is probably bringing up all kinds of feeling and maybe she just can’t, because why should she have too? Stop making us your mules to carry other people’s burdens

    • GuestWho says:

      “Who’s really driving this?” Rupert Murdoch and his ilk. Same shi*t, different tabloid. The NY Post will happily carry water for the right wing in the UK.

  41. Awkward symphony says:

    Yet another tabloid speculating on what Meghan feels/does..🙄
    We’ll not know until she cuts her off or Jessica talks but I doubt it’d happen. We’ve seen how famous people forgave affairs/theft/backstabbing..etc (beyonce forgiving jeyz, Rihanna forgiving her father *years ago* for badmouthung her & even saying she deserved to be beaten by chris!!,Diana forgiving her stepmother..)although different, I think after the social unrest gradually decreases we’ll see Jessica post a more serious apology+make a donation as well as doing stuff on camera educating herself on what white privilege is. Her pr team has alot to do but she’ll definitely get back from this as a white woman

  42. Lolo says:

    Oh I believe this came directly from Meghan (or someone at Sunshine Sachs). She tried being mortified by this one incident, publicly distant but privately supportive. And that may have worked fine if it had been just the one incident, the news cycle moves on. But CTV has launched an internal investigation and they are interviewing employees of Jessica’s show to get their stories. Also Lainey in her article earlier this week said outright that there were more stories and people who were currently weighing speaking out. If all that’s true, things are about to get much worse for Jessica, and Meghan has to distance herself more forcefully. She’s not responsible for Jessica’s behavior but birds of a feather flock together and if your very best friend is an absolutely horrible person then there are people who are going to ask what that says about you.

    Also these two women close friends, but they had a professional relationship that included not only Jessica acting as Meghan’s stylist but also acting as Meghan’s press henchwoman. She is name-checked specifically in the MoS lawsuit for having called the paper and tried to influence stories about Meghan to be more favorable to Meghan, on Meghan’s behalf. Presumably, she knows whatever skeletons exist and if it’s true that she is as vindictive as people say, and she sees this as the beginning of Meghan’s betrayal then it might be 🍿 🍿 🍿

    • kelleybelle says:

      Where are people getting that Jess was ever her stylist? She is not. Meghan doesn’t have one. Jess did something on Suits but it was for the show, not Meghan personally.

      • Sofia says:

        People think that because she’s a stylist and Meghan’s friend, she’s automatically Meghan’s stylist

    • Olenna says:

      One thing is for sure: The trolls have been triggered, 😂.

      • Vanessa says:

        I think a lot the Meghan haters are hoping that Jessica and Meghan have a falling out they are hoping that Jessica will turn against Meghan . And Jessica will spill all these secrets about Meghan that they hope will bring her down peg and trigger a divorce between Meghan and Harry it’s truly pathetic and evil . I think this article is hogwash and just speculation I don’t believe that anyone in Sussex’s camp are talking to page six I know that what someone was saying that earlier on the thread they think Sussex’s Pr people are putting this out but i don’t think the Sussex’s Pr are doing that amateur hour that something the palace does . No one knows the state of meghan and Jessica relationship I thinks it’s really something that we are having a whole world discussion on Racism and some white people still think it’s their right to police how black peoples live their lives it’s crazy how so many white woman are telling Meghan what she should or shouldn’t .

      • Nic919 says:

        So many trolls today.

      • Olenna says:

        The haters (i.e., obsessed anti-stans) have an evolving and revolving agenda against the Duchess of Sussex. It doesn’t matter what the media says or prints about her–good, bad, or indifferent–these sociopaths will spin it to do the most damage to her character. Most of them never heard of JM before the DoS began dating PH, but they automatically hated her when they learned she was a friend. That’s why they’re all over these JM threads–to bash the DoS; they could GAF about white privilege and racism in this instance. They have gone directly to the DoS’ charities to denigrate her, so there is no hate-filled criticism or desire for bad to happen to her that’s too low for them to use against her or wish for.
        It seems like a lot, but I think it’s a few commenting under different names. They think no one pays attention to their predictable dumb shit.

    • Jaded says:

      Such a trollish comment. Utter fabrication.

    • Molly says:

      Lol. Sunshine Sachs is for Travelyst.

      Whenever someone brings up Sunshine Sachs, I know they’re part of the Mexgit crowd.

  43. emu says:

    Well I’m sure Meghan profited from her connection to Jess before she met Harry. Just sayin

    • L4frimaire says:

      Did she get her the audition on Suits, or the work with the UN, or USO tours,or content on her blog? How exactly did she help her, apart from socializing? Maybe the Trudeaus, I’ll concede. Even her intro to Harry was through other friends. Who was the one with the Hollywood connections? Not Jessica.

      • carmen says:

        Ha ha, exactly. I think in terms of her long term acting ambitions, making solid connections with the creme de la creme in T.O. would not have been a top priority for Meghan. Ultimately when the show ran its course, wouldn’t she have headed back to Hollywood?

  44. Bmore says:

    Page Six is straight up BS,another Murdoch owned POS, this source said this and another source said that, gtfoh. This is nothing other than trash tabloids trying to break-up this friendship to get Jessica on their side to spill friendship secrets. First off Jessica cannot be one of Archies godparents cause she is Jewish, Second, I don’t believe for one second that Meghan and Jessica have been on the outs of anything, seeing how Archie was left with Jessica when they took their brief comeback to the UK to say they were leaving, and by then Jessica already had “I do Redo” and her GMA gig. I’m sure Meghan was probably hurt by Jessica’s actions and also upset that she was being dragged into an argument that had nothing to do with her. But Jessica has been more like a sister to Meghan than even her real sister. So as I said previously this is nothing more than trash rags,UK mostly trying to separate two BF,

    • L4frimaire says:

      Interesting in all this how they barely mention the actual black woman involved in this. It’s like the story steamrolled over her and she is just a side note in it, although she is the person directly impacted who was exchanging DMs with Jessica. Where is the follow up on this angle , what are her next moves? No one is quoting her. I find that very strange. Maybe people in Canada can provide more insight on this. Where is Sasha and what does she have to say?

      • Lizzieb says:

        @l4frimaire. Sasha seems like a pretty classy person and imagine she is laying low while other stories about Jessica are investigated. If she has more to say after that I imagine we will hear from her

      • carmen says:

        Sasha is still on IG, mainly stories. One of her partners is Joe Fresh clothing & she did a post on that. I would be very surprised if Sasha’s career prospects improved dramatically after this sh*t show – the positive response and support she has received was incredible.

      • carmen says:

        edit: “I would be very surprised if Sasha’s career prospects *didn’t* improve dramatically…”

      • L4frimaire says:

        @Carmen, so if Sasha is keeping her own counsel and is well supported, and Jessica will face further repercussions, why is there any need to bring Meghan into this at all? It seems like it’s being handled and no one in Canada seems to be asking for her. Tabloids just want a fight and more gossip fodder. She neither has to defend or denounce. To quote Insecure “ not me, not today”.

  45. yinyang says:

    If they’ve grown apart– I understand. But I I hope Meghan didn’t cut her loose over this. What kind of friend would Meghan be, she’d be the same as Kate in my books. Megha wouldn’t do that.

  46. coolspray says:

    Not gonna lie. Only clicked on this to laugh at Jessica’s assy style.