Here are some pictures of Suri Cruise and Katie Holmes out and about in Boston earlier this week. Surprisingly enough, Katie doesn’t look death warmed over – her outfit is really cute, but I really wish she would stop rolling up her jeans. That trend needs to die. Suri, as always, looks totally fabulous. Thank goodness, she didn’t try to apply her own lipstick again, and she’s not wearing her sparkly kitten heels. Instead, Suri’s rocking striped leggings, a lovely little violet tiered blouse and… drum roll, please… leopard-print ballet flats! Kick. Ass. I love those shoes. I’m with Katie – Suri might be my fashion inspiration too.
The Sun is reporting that Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes have spent 2 million pounds in total on 3-year-old Suri’s wardrobe – I just did checked with the exchange rate calculator, and that’s $3,220,720! Do you believe it? I’ll buy that Suri’s wardrobe – from her first newborn onsie to her current kitten heels – would be in the “hundreds of thousands of dollars” range, but I find $3.2 million to be a bit absurd. Or is it? I was just skimming through our Suri Cruise archives, and it’s kind of amazing how Suri is consistently decked out in beautiful, expensive-looking little doll clothes. Little doll dresses, usually… and no coats and very few pairs of pants. Princess Suri prefers her couture doll dresses, thank you very much.
TOM Cruise’s three-year-old daughter Suri has a wardrobe of designer clothes worth £2MILLION.
Actor Tom, 47, and wife KATIE HOLMES, 30, have commissioned the world’s top fashion names to custom-make outfits for their toddler.
An insider said: “They really splurge on Suri.” The pair’s pal VICTORIA BECKHAM is also said to have commissioned designer ROBERT CAVALLI to make a dress for Suri.
The source added: “Suri is very vocal when it comes to outfits. She’s rarely seen in anything twice.”
[From The Sun]
Yeah, I really don’t think it’s that much, but I haven’t priced kids’ couture lately. My guess is that if there are enough rich, gullible, shopaholic parents (cough cough TomKat), there are probably enough stores that sell $10,000 dresses for 3-year-olds. The tabloids usually inflate these numbers – several months ago, they were reporting that Suri’s special, fancy, elaborate tutoring cost Tom $1 million, and I think that was probably total bullsh-t. If the report has any truth whatsoever, then Katie needs to get a new hobby other than spending Tom’s money.
Suri Cruise and Katie Holmes are shown on 9/29/09, credit: Fame Pictures
Say what you will about Tom and Katie, that little girl is adorable and is genuinely loved by the both of them.
Suri is so freakin cute!! I don’t see how Katie can be around her and not be smiling all the time. Kaiser, I agree about Katie’s rolled up jeans. Not only does that trend need to die, it never needed to start.
well I at least hope that when she out grows her clothes, that they donate them to charity!
That little girl is not going to be cute when she gets older, she has Tom’s schnoz.
This is sickening.
I LOVE this kid!!! I bet she’s a spoiled little rugrat with an attitude to match though! I like the Star cover with her as the Princess and Shiloh as the Tomboy. Too cute.
“The Sun is reporting”…….. So that automatically makes this a true story. Ok….. Laugh!
While I hope that’s just a slow news day resulting in a nonsensical story, if it is true it is a disgusting story of too much money and too little sense. There are children all over the world who don’t have food let alone shoes. I think this glorification of a small child to ‘fashion icon’ status is just bollocks!
Oh, great. some more idiotic boring “gossip” about the outrageous life of a celebrity toddler.
And I love how Suri and Shiloh are the new ‘bad girl vs. good girl’ act. Suri is the entitled brat and Shiloh is the free spirited golden child. LOL.
More importantly, is Suri licking her lips after taking a drink and brushing her hair out of her face
OR
is Suri making a scientolotot gang sign???
Oh please! If you had Tom Cruise’s money, are you seriously telling me you wouldnt spend a lot on your only toddler? I highly doubt its $3M, but even if it is, thats NOTHING for him. Why not spend it on your kids? What would you rather him spend it on? Just because the Holie-Sh*tts let their kids walk around in rags doesnt mean everyone else has to.
Suri looks adorable here!
That kid will be a BRAT thanks to her fame-whoring parents…or ‘parent’ I should say, since Tom is merely using Suri as a prop to prove that he is heterosexual. Josh Hartnett is Suri’s dad.
While I am sure her wardrobe costs more than all of ours, i seriously doubt that it is at the $3 million level.
She is one cute kid, that is for sure!
Three million dollars divided by an average of $500, which is probably still too high, means that she would have 6000 outfits. Is there anybody who seriously believes that a three year old has 6000 outfits? It’s an average of 5+ outfits a day for her entire lifespan. This is the kind of stupid story that gets made up because nobody would ever waste two seconds of their life bothering to deny it.
I love fashion, but I don’t see anything even remotely cute about either of these girls outfits. Katie still looks like death warmed over (what happened to her???) and Suri is quickly going from adorable little kid to little brat. Another Paris Hilton in the making, I’m afraid.
And again, why does Katie always look zombie-ish? This woman use to be cute and aglow. I don’t get this.
More importantly, is Suri licking her lips after taking a drink and brushing her hair out of her face
OR
is Suri making a scientolotot gang sign???
========================================
I thought Suri was flashing a gang sign too. It’s funny how six months ago Suri always hid from the paps and never were pants. Now she always plays up to them and is wearing pants, at least leggings, all of the time.
Why does TomKate feel the need to sexualize their 3 year old daughter. Leaopard print is for an adult woman not a little girl. Very soon Suri will be wearing half shirts and daisy dukes with a pair of wedges.
Ridiculous. Celebrities are always bitching and moaning about rich CEOs and what not, when in fact, they’re some of the greediest bastards alive. Too bad Obama won’t consider a pay cap on those fools. (Actually, I wouldn’t support it if he did, since I am unapologetic capitalist.) Still, if you’re going to make that much money and spend that much on an effing 3 year old’s clothes, I hope that a) they’re all being donated to charity afterward and b) you shut the F up about other people’s lifestyles.
Is it that warm in Boston right now ?
Tom does have two other children, not only Suri. Tom gives 30 million to scientology and spends 3 million on Suris clothes. Could care less about this superficial family.
$3 million for Tom Cruise is the equivalent of $500 for the rest of us. In that perspective it is not out of line. She is a cute little girl. I hope her parents instill some values about money into her at some point. Otherwise she is going to grow up to be as shallow and vapid as that idiot, Paris Hilton.
Proportional to wealth it’s not out of line, but by the amount of clothes it represents it certainly it. It’s would be more items of clothes than days she’s been out of line.
I call total bullshit.
um no I am from Boston and it is definitely sweater or a sweatshirt season already! Um Katie has on a sweater!! Maybe Suri’s is in their bags?
Well good. Maybe she could give her mom some fashion tips while she’s at it.
Why? Is this necessary ? Love is all you need. $ 3000.000.00 wardrobe by the age of 4 however is a little too extra ordinarily out of line.
I see some inflation on Katie. Commence pregnancy rumors!!
Kate seems like a really good mom. She’s always with the kid and focusing on her. Tom’s an ass. Always was. Always will be. I’m guessing no more kkkkids for kkkkkatie?
oh my goodness, suri’s little outfit is adorable – that’s an especially mini-“fierce” look for her, since she usually does more of a babydoll dress thing – her clothes are completely cute, but it’s her funny little attitude that kills me.
It all boils down to one thing; Katie Holmes is a sad individual. Anyone else in her place with good fashion sense would rock it. So Very Sad…
this Fashion Show, I win! sickitten wins.
“Katie needs to get a new hobby other than spending Tom’s money”. That’s a bit rough. She has just finished making a movie in Melbourne.
And seriously, you have to have some perks being married to Tom.
It wouldn’t matter how many hobbies I had, I would still find time to spend his money. It would be my way of consoling myself for making such a stupid decision. Eww I am creeping myself out now.
If TomKat wanna spend big on their daughter’s wardrobe then that’s fair enough. Couture clothes, after all, are generally made by well trained and paid professionals, as opposed to the child-labour used to make a significant proportion of the apparel sported by the offspring of those criticising them for spending too much. At least Tom and Katie appear unapologetic for their wealth – that at least is honest. In comparison, it always makes me laugh, the stories about how frugal Angelina “lives in multiple multi-million-dollar mansions” Jolie is…
But she’s not an over-indulged brat or anything. Just because her wardrobe is worth more than the yearly income of a small country.
Warning: They are growing The Bad Seed!
Scientology gang sign…lmfao!!!!
I wonder if Suri will turn like those Kardashian half sisters who at 12 are already dressing like young women with mini skirts, high heels and make up on.
Outfit? Jennifer Garner does better with clothes she picks up off the floor.
As far as Suri, I agree with nnn. I looked at the close-up of Suri and it is pretty clear that, rather than take her mother’s hand while crossing the street, Suri is posing for the camera. I hope this kid isn’t taking superficiality to a new level.
Disgusting. Children starving, abused and abandoned and this is what we think is newsworthy? Disgusting.
I’ll tell you, my 20$ Target jeans look better than that fuggery Katie’s got on.
As for Suri, she looks absolutely fabulous, although I think it can be done for much less. My five year old throws together a mean outfit- the less it matches, the better…the more glamourous, the better. I stopped her from wearing a sari skirt to school today only because she had gym.
The number of hateful comments here disturb me! Suri is an adorable, INNOCENT, child – like all 3-year-olds!
The number of concerned commenters here is dreadful! I can’t believe all the hate spewed upon the haters! And how did you read this in the first place??? Boo Hoo!!! Let’s just call this the CryBabyBitch site for all the whiners and nanny-goats who need to parent the rest of the world. Go somewhere else…
Suri is an adorable, INNOCENT, child – like all 3-year-olds!
You obviously have no practical real-world experience with 3 year olds, because my little Lizzy was completely, verifiably possessed by Satan himself for that entire year.
Suri has been watching cameras watching her since infancy. She has her dad’s eye for knowing at all times where the camera is.
She seems cute and even entertaining, however, there is something odd about her. Her fingers often look palsied. The expression of her mouth off. She does not smile a child’s full smile ever.
And most sad, her mother never smiles while looking directly into her eyes. She walks with as if modeling what a mother and child should look like, not actually being the mother with her adorable, beloved, mischievous monster. Katie is the most detached mother I have ever witnessed and she makes sure, absolutely makes sure, that we the public witness her being a mother.
Finally, what normal child limply hangs onto their parent without talking, interrupting pulling, wriggling away? Suri is well controlled in public, no doubt, and therefore I cannot agree that she is a brat. Bratty children are never “well behaved” like this child. There is something very weird about the whole thing.
I always envoius of Suri’s wadrobe. Her jackets especially, – when she wears one that is.
@Heironymous…it’s going to take me all day to stop laughing and yelling “Yes!Yes!”. BTW, the 4th year was even worse…
Take it easy on these crazies. I don’t agree or disagree (tho’ I think people should be nicer when it comes to children). She’s still just a little kid, born into a public gong show. How does anyone here know what goes on at their house?
these folks are spending a lot of money for clothes, where a lot of children from all over the world are starving and died from hunger…
Suri is not adorable. She comes accross as a spoiled little girl. I would not want her to be in my family.
My brother recommended I might like this web site. He used to be entirely right. This publish truly made my day. You can not believe simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!
Thank you for the good writeup. It in truth used to be a enjoyment account it. Glance complex to far added agreeable from you! By the way, how could we keep up a correspondence?