The Windsors spent £13 million of taxpayer money on private flights in a decade

Last November, Glasgow hosted the COP26 Climate Conference. World leaders traveled by plane from Rome (where the G20 Summit had been held) to Glasgow for an international conference about climate change. It was always going to be a bad look, especially given that all of the same people went to Rome and Glasgow, almost as if they could have just done the conference in Rome. Prince Charles obviously went to Rome, and then he acted as “host” of the COP26 in Glasgow, because the Queen was too ill to attend. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge also made some extremely lightweight appearances at and around the conference too, including “playing with kids” and “getting drunk and jazz-handy.” The Cambridges had to make a big show of “traveling by train” to the climate conference, which is pretty funny given how much William, Kate, Charles and Camilla travel by private plane and helicopter. Now there’s even more energy towards how much money they’ve spent on private flights and how bad it all is for the environment:

The Royal Family spent more than £13m of public money on private chartered flights and helicopter journeys just under a decade before leading calls at Cop26 to combat the climate crisis, it can be revealed. The Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William each issued stark messages to world leaders at the Glasgow summit about the threat posed to the planet by climate change – with the monarch urging them to act for “our children and our children’s children”.

But an investigation by The Independent has found that the Royals have taken millions of pounds’ worth of taxpayer-funded journeys using chartered flights and helicopters in the last eight years, prompting scrutiny from green campaigners, with one pointing out that people “believe in action much more strongly than words”.

It comes after criticism of world leaders and delegates who opted to travel to Cop26 in November by private jet – which are up to 14 times more polluting per passenger than commercial flights, according to a recent report. Boris Johnson and Prince Charles were among those who used private jets at the summit.

The Royal Family’s official travel is funded via the taxpayer through the Sovereign Grant. A comprehensive analysis by The Independent of travel data published in Sovereign Grant annual accounts from 2013/14 to 2020/21 reveals that at least £13.5m has been spent on travel using chartered flights and helicopters.

[From The Independent]

The Independent’s investigation uncovered a huge list of taxpayer-funded flights undertaken by Charles and Camilla specifically, including chartered flights to and from Colombia, Mexico, Muscat, India, Sri Lanka, Qatar, Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and on and on. What bugs me is that the Independent clearly “investigated” those flights for which there is a modicum of transparency, because Charles and Camilla were on official business, and they likely had security, press and staff flying with them. You could argue that while private/chartered flights are bad, if the plane is full and they’re there on official state/diplomatic business, it’s not AS bad.

What’s painful is that there’s zero transparency for the chartered flights and “private” helicopter trips for vacations and just regular travel in and around the UK for the royals. This is where it’s enormously tricky, because (from what I understand) there’s no line-item in the royal travel budget where people could really see how many times William and Kate fly by helicopter to and from Anmer Hall, for the hell of it, because they can.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “The Windsors spent £13 million of taxpayer money on private flights in a decade”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Amy Bee says:

    Where’s the press outrage about these findings?

    • PaulaH says:

      The Brits really don’t care how many millions are spent on flights or clothes for Kate. They are more concerned about security for Archie…..now that’s crossing the line in their eyes.

  2. Wiglet Watcher says:

    Let’s hear the cost of the private helicopter the Cambridge’s have via the queen… no one spends private funds on that thing.

  3. Southern Fried says:

    Wth are they doing on all those trips anyway, the fkn fkrs.

  4. Agreatreckoning says:

    The private charters/flights for the unofficial trips should be itemized.

    • Anance says:

      I am sure they are somewhere. Even for their internal reconciliation purposes, they must break it out. Unless the Royals prefer to keep opaque even to themselves.

  5. Becks1 says:

    So for this:

    “there’s no line-item in the royal travel budget where people could really see how many times William and Kate fly by helicopter to and from Anmer Hall”

    I think there used to be, right? They used to break down things helicopter travel for personal and work related, and then just started doing it as one big category for travel, and that’s when people (reporters? IDK) started tracking whether the travel was for work or not based on what the royals were wearing, so then they built the privacy hedge so no one can track their comings and goings. Totally transparent 😒

    (even if I”m wrong about the different budget categories, which I could be, I’m not wrong about the privacy hedge LOL.)

    I do think there is a big difference in taking a private jet halfway around the world for work, especially if they are traveling with a large entourage, and taking the helicopter to and from your country home every weekend. No one comes after Joe Biden for using Air Force One, you know? But I think in general the lack of transparency is the issue. Who pays for the royal family’s travel if its NOT work related? and if it is work related, shouldn’t there be a duty to find the cheapest and most efficient way to travel? Like no one is saying to take a train if its going to take 10 hours (hey, American here, our rail travel is not the best, lol.) But if taking a train will take 90 minutes and a helicopter will take an hour, maybe the train is a perfectly fine option. (commercial train, not royal train)

    • Mrs.Krabapple says:

      Well, they can’t reveal how often William takes the helicopter, since that would raise questions about how often he actually participates in extra-marital activities (the Queen’s supposed concern about how much William “flies in a helicopter” is surely a euphemism).

    • Isabella says:

      No one comes after Joe Biden because he is the president, the most powerful elected official in the U.S. Using Air Force One comes with the job. The royals are just, well, I don’t even know how to describe them.

  6. Colby says:

    I’m actually not opposed to them flying privately for state business, especially, like Kaiser says here, if the plane is full with others. And especially especially if it’s long haul where there are no non-stop commercial options. Much like with Air Force 1 – it makes sense in these cases to me for the taxpayer to fund these activities.

    But in the same way that Presidential kids don’t get to take AF1 by themselves, I don’t think the taxpayer should be footing the bill for the personal travel of people down the line of succession.

  7. Over it says:

    This is all Meghan fault. Meghan bewitched Harry 3 years before they met to make him lead his family astray into private travel.

  8. SourcesclosetoKate says:

    Wow in only ten years, could’ve set 30 British families up for life. But let’s not talk about that, now what is that little family in California up to?

    • Mac says:

      Flying private is incredibly expensive and I was side-eyeing 13 million pounds because it seemed too low, but, of course, travel was restricted in 2020 and 2021 due to covid. We’re really looking at six years of “official” travel.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Mac it also seemed low to me but I have never priced it out, LOL But that’s a good point about the pandemic and the lack of traveling over the past two years. Even Charles has only done a handful of international trips (his trip to the middle east this fall, I think he went to the middle east one other time for a funeral maybe? and the trip to Rome – even if I’m missing one or two, I feel like its a lot less than he would typically do over the course of two years.) The Cambridges haven’t done any international trips for work as far as I’m aware. And of course the actual head of state, the queen, isn’t traveling internationally at all and I think the only place she flies to is Balmoral.

      • SourcesclosetoKate says:

        That’s true that number would be considerably higher if not for covid and secret unconfirmed trips.

      • Anance says:

        It’s definitely too low. I’m sure the “official travel” category is narrowly defined.

  9. Concern Fae says:

    Let’s be honest. The whole private jet industry is a scam largely funded at taxpayer’s expense, at least in the US. Rich people set up a corporation. Business flights? Deducted as a business cost. Personal flights? The celebrity “reimburses” the corporation for what a first class ticket would have cost them. The entire cost of the flight can be deducted by the corporation as a business expense.

    Somebody figures out a tax scam like this, it balloons into a small industry, and suddenly we can’t get rid of this horrendous waste of tax dollars (and environmental debacle) because of “jobs.”

    But I’ve also booked travel for someone internationally famous in their field and the airline industry sucks. Maybe if rich people had to use it it might be less terrible.

  10. equality says:

    Why does the press get to fly with them on the taxpayer’s dime? They should be chipping in and paying considering the billionaire tabloid owners can afford it. Also, even with official trips, how many of them are really necessary and aren’t things that could be handled by zoom calls?

    • SourcesclosetoKate says:

      That’s right, no wonder the press love them, they pay for flights, hotels, restaurants the best of the best on the public dime. It’s like a free vacation. In the words of lil kim “Why spend mine when I can spend yours”

  11. Feeshalori says:

    On an off note, every time l see William glaring at glad-hands Kate with his fist, l think of Ralph Kramden saying, “To the moon, Alice!”

  12. MissKitten(is my cats name) says:

    13 million in a decade?? Thar sounds INSANELY low. I almost wonder if the Independent agreed to put out a fake, super scaled down number, presenting it as the fruits of their “investigation”. im sure that the palaces will respond with some elementary level math showing that it only cost taxpayers £0.38/year or something. I tend to think the Independent is above that sort of thing, but I’ve been losing faith more and more in the “good” media outlets.
    I don’t remember who specifically recommended Byline, but whoever you are; Thank you!!! I think they just might be the only honest reporters in the whole UK

  13. Isabella says:

    I wish they would itemize the flights because then we would know where William and Kate go when they disappear for months at a time. I mean, how did they get to Jordan?