For the better part of a month, the royal reporters have been obsessed with the late Lady Liza Anson, who died in 2019. Anson was Queen Elizabeth II’s cousin and friend, and Anson was a favorite gossip source for many royal reporters, as it turns out. She was “a source close to QEII” or perhaps just a “royal source.” In her last years, Anson had a major grudge against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The Sussexes didn’t hire her to plan any part of their wedding (Anson was a party planner) and so, as punishment, Anson told lots of reporters about QEII’s fury with Harry and Meghan. According to Anson, QEII had to “give up her solitude” in a 1,000-room Norman castle when she rented Frogmore Cottage to the Sussexes. Anson was especially pissed about everything involving the Sussexes’ wedding, and she claimed that QEII was as well. QEII was allegedly big mad that Meghan A) wore a veil, B) wore white, and C) refused to tell QEII about every single part of the wedding planning.
At no point during all of this third-hand hearsay and gossip-mongering has anyone over there acknowledged that, actually, the queen was in the wrong. If Anson’s gossip is correct, QEII was throwing a tantrum over her grandson’s wife-to-be wearing a white gown to a globally-televised royal wedding. No one has said “well, Meghan had the right to do whatever she wanted, it was her wedding after all.” Then, weirdly, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden put this item in his column:
Meghan Markle’s choice of dress for her second wedding, to Prince Harry, is said to have caused Queen Elizabeth to raise an eyebrow. The late Queen is reported to have thought her gown was ‘too white’ for a divorcee.
Prince William’s cousin has, however, defended Meghan’s choice and explained why she, too, wore an ivory gown for her own second wedding.
Maddison May Brudenell – whose great-grandfather was King Charles’s beloved great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten of Burma – exchanged vows with Canadian welder Bret Kapetanov last November. And Maddison reveals that she had to overcome the opposition of her mother, Edwina Hicks.
The model, 31, says: ‘In the monarch’s view, it was not appropriate for a divorcee getting remarried in church to look quite so flamboyantly virginal. My mother, our late Queen’s goddaughter, had said exactly the same to me, and that other family members would agree.’
Maddison, who previously ran off to be secretly married to a DJ, Olaoluwa Modupe-Ojo, wore a bespoke white dress by Laura Green, of Modern Bride, for her wedding to Kapetanov.
Of her frank conversation with her mother, she says: ‘I was sad to think about the painful past during what I wanted to be a joyful, future-focused time of my life. But I understood the notion. My mum was speaking out of love. I didn’t let my feelings overcome me – we talked about it.’
‘However, as I told my mother, we may as well splash muddy water, drip some blood, sweat and tears on it for good measure. As it happens, my dress did have a lot of unique components, but these were because of what I chose and not in any way what I felt I must choose. My mother listened to my wisdom and respected my style.’
This is actually completely normal – an older relative has super-conservative opinions about weddings, and the bride says “okay, granny, but I’m still going to do what I want because it’s my wedding,” and the granny just has to deal. As I’ve said this whole time, I can understand why a woman of QEII’s generation would have thoughts and opinions about “which brides can wear white.” It’s the weaponization of those opinions which bugs me, and using a dead queen’s memory to bash Meghan for “making her own choices for her wedding.” There were literally dozens of royal reporters writing ghastly sh-t about Meghan in the past month, all because one dead woman said another dead woman was “furious, confused and HURT” by Meghan’s choice to wear white SEVEN YEARS AGO.
PS… if we’re getting into conservative wedding rules about who can and cannot wear white, I find it remarkable that QEII seemingly had no opinion about the then-Duchess of Cambridge wearing white to another woman’s wedding.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.
- USA Rights Only – Berkshire, UK -20180519- Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, at St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle in Berkshire -PICTURED: Doria Ragland, Meghan Markle -PHOTO by: PA Images/INSTARimages.com -36587677.jpg This is an editorial, rights-managed image. Please contact Instar Images LLC for licensing fee and rights information at sales@instarimages.com or call +1 212 414 0207 This image may not be published in any way that is, or might be deemed to be, defamatory, libelous, pornographic, or obscene. Please consult our sales department for any clarification needed prior to publication and use. Instar Images LLC reserves the right to pursue unauthorized users of this material. If you are in violation of our intellectual property rights or copyright you may be liable for damages, loss of income, any profits you derive from the unauthorized use of this material and, where appropriate, the cost of collection and/or any statutory damages awarded Featuring: Doria Ragland, Meghan Markle Where: Berkshire, England, United Kingdom When: 19 May 2018 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages.com **USA Rights Only**
- USA Rights Only – Berkshire, UK -20180519- Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, at St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle in Berkshire -PICTURED: Prince Harry, Meghan Markle -PHOTO by: PA Images/INSTARimages.com -36583723.jpg This is an editorial, rights-managed image. Please contact Instar Images LLC for licensing fee and rights information at sales@instarimages.com or call +1 212 414 0207 This image may not be published in any way that is, or might be deemed to be, defamatory, libelous, pornographic, or obscene. Please consult our sales department for any clarification needed prior to publication and use. Instar Images LLC reserves the right to pursue unauthorized users of this material. If you are in violation of our intellectual property rights or copyright you may be liable for damages, loss of income, any profits you derive from the unauthorized use of this material and, where appropriate, the cost of collection and/or any statutory damages awarded Featuring: Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Where: Berkshire, England, United Kingdom When: 19 May 2018 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages.com **USA Rights Only**
- ©Licenced to i-Images Picture Agency. All Rights Reserved. UK copyright law applies to all print & online publications. i-Images space rates apply to all images. Magazines contact agency for fees before use. Images Single use only then repro fees apply. Info@i-images.co Office Tel: +44 20 8506 1486, LOndon, Windsor Australian & NZ Rights ONLY The Royal Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle at Windsor Castle. Picture by i-Images / Pool71 PICTURED: Meghan Markle,Prince Harry -PHOTO by: INSTARimages.com -Instar_The_Royal_Wedding_282 Editorial Rights Managed Image – Please contact www.INSTARimages.com for licensing fee and rights: North America Inquiries: email sales@instarimages.com or call 212.414.0207 – UK Inquiries: email ben@instarimages.com or call + 7715 698 715 – Australia Inquiries: email sarah@instarimages.com.au Êor call +02 9660 0500 Ð for any other Country, please email sales@instarimages.com. ÊImage or video may not be published in any way that is or might be deemed defamatory, libelous, pornographic, or obscene / Please consult our sales department for any clarification or question you may have – http://www.INSTARimages.com reserves the right to pursue unauthorized users of this image or video. If you are in violation of our intellectual property you may be liable for actual damages, loss of income, and profits you derive from the use of this image or video, and where appropriate, the cost of collection and/or statutory damage. Featuring: Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Where: LOndon, Windsor, United Kingdom When: 19 May 2018 Credit: INSTARimages.com **©Licenced to i-Images Picture Agency. All Rights Reserved. UK copyright law applies to all print & online publications. i-Images space rates apply to all images. Magazines contact agency for fees before use. Images Single use only then repro fees apply. I**
- (170118) — DAVOS, Jan. 18, 2017 () — U.S. Vice President Joe Biden speaks at the 47th Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 18, 2017.(/Xu Jinquan)(gl)
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex with their baby son, who was born on Monday morning, during a photocall in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle in Berkshire.
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex with their baby son, who was born on Monday morning, during a photocall in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle in Berkshire.
- NEWS EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO COMMERCIAL USE. NO MERCHANDISING, ADVERTISING, SOUVENIRS, MEMORABILIA or COLOURABLY SIMILAR. NOT FOR USE AFTER 31 DECEMBER 2018 WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION FROM KENSINGTON PALACE. NO CROPPING. Publications are asked to credit the photograph to Alexi Lubomirski. The photograph must not be digitally enhanced, manipulated or modified in any manner or form and must include all of the individuals in the photograph when published. This official wedding photograph released by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex shows The Duke and Duchess in The Green Drawing Room, Windsor Castle, with (left-to-right): Back row: Master Jasper Dyer, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Prince of Wales, Ms. Doria Ragland, The Duke of Cambridge; middle row: Master Brian Mulroney, the Duke of Edinburgh, Queen Elizabeth II, the Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Charlotte, Prince George, Miss Rylan Litt, Master John Mulroney; Front row: Miss Ivy Mulroney, Miss Florence van Cutsem, Miss Zalie Warren, Miss Remi Litt.
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex with their baby son, who was born on Monday morning, during a photocall in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle in Berkshire.
- Queen Elizabeth II looks on during the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle.
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle during their wedding service at St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle.
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle kiss on the steps of St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle after their wedding.
- (Left to right) The Duke of Cambridge, the Prince of Wales, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Duchess of Cambridge, the Duke of York and Princess Beatrice sitting in St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle during the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Oh dear, even Dick is avoiding mentioning the great Greek holiday rort and instead digs up a random unknown Mountbatten cousin to resurrect a non-issue over an historic wedding dress.
What possibly could Dick be deflecting from?
Keen is looking daggers at the wedding. If the queen looked at every aspect of the wedding why did she not speak up over keens tantrums before the wedding
Didn’t Anne and Camilla wear white to their second weddings? All this says to me is the Queen was a busy body who was stuck in her old ways.
Anne wore a white jacket over a white midi dress. Camilla wore…basically the same thing, for the civil ceremony, but for the ‘blessing ceremony’ in an actual church she wore a shiney….like, peacock greige thing?
Nobody’s opinion matters. Bride wants to wear white who gives two F’S if she’s a virgin or whatever outdated opinion anyone has. Stupid
If white’s only for virgins, then Waity couldn’t have worn one.
When a woman allows her husband to have a side piece, that she have to invites to functions, she is no positive, to tell another woman what to wear to their wedding.
I’m so proud of Meghan for not letting that old hag plan her wedding, or telling the queen the details about her dress.
Very true. Lived in a pretend marriage for decades, just like her grandson the heir is doing. No wonder Phillip’s will is locked up for decades. I’m just wondering if she had her own side pieces.
I guess great, but whether it’s a defense or opposition I wouldn’t care either way about someone this distantly and tangentially related’s opinion. It’s my wedding not yours, and this idea of virginal and white is gross too. And pretty silly in this day and age.
Lady Anson like so many others saw Meghan’s popularity and thought that they could latch on and boost themselves with it. And then got angry because Meghan was a fully formed adult woman with her own ideas, but also her own connections and contacts and didn’t need to rely on them for things for the wedding. And I think that’s what irked. She wasn’t babe in the woods and could point to her own life experience and knowledge to counter them.
It was Harry who rejected her services, but of course like always, they blamed Meghan for it.
can you imagine w/ that so-called ‘lady’ would have said if she did work on the wedding???!!!!!
LOL, yeah when are we gonna get the queen’s opinion on Kate wearing a dress that photographed as a cream/white at Meghan’s wedding. Especially after Kate threw a tantrum over bridemaids dresses and acted like a bridezilla when she wasn’t even the bride. Not to mention lying about it to the press later to make herself the victim. Those are some seriously poor behaviors. But sure let’s talk about how Meghan wore a white dress for her wedding/s.
Well, why was Kate wearing white at her own wedding after shacking up with William? Or Sophie? Didn’t she live with Edward before marrying?
valid questions. Bc if white is for purity…lol. It’s apparently a specific issue about divorce and the church which to me is whatever.
How many brides these days are virgins when they marry, both my DILs had a baby before marriage, both in white. White only became fashionable for wedding gowns because Queen Victoria wore white for her wedding, I wonder who decided that white was only for virgins.
I don’t believe QE2 at her age was bitching about H&M’s wedding all day. What I think happened, this woman bad-mouthed H&M to QE2 because Harry rejected her services and QE2 either didn’t say anything or just nodded, which she took as QE2 agreeing with her and leaked the reporters that QE2 said all that sh*t. From every interaction QE2 had with Meghan, she approved of her. If she thought of Meghan like this, she would pay Meghan zero attention publicly like she did to Kate multiple times in front of the cameras.
Honestly, I could see Queenie thinking for a moment that it was a bit much for a second-time bride because Queenie was born in 1926 to the most conservative family in the most conservative social circle imaginable, but dear GOD the woman would never say so!
Supposedly hundreds of people live in Windsor Castle-retired military who take part in some things and staff. Then there are all the houses leased out on the estate and tourists coming through. Adelaide is nearly the same distance as FC from the castle, so no moaning about W&K invading her privacy? Only the biracial woman impinged on her privacy? And only inappropriate for Meghan to wear white and not Kate who shacked up with Will before marrying? Get back to me on wedding attire when they come up with something to indicate the man is a virgin.
Exactly. If the white wedding dress is to symbolise virginity then the late Queen should also frowned at Kate Middleton as she should not wear white at her wedding too.
and kate dodged getting checked by a doctor to make sure her hymen was intact. guess cause it wasn’t!
Were there ever in virgins to marry into that family other than Harry’s mother? From what I have read, there have not been any others
Well, I think before Charles’s generation got to marriageable age it was just sort of assumed…and anyone who had any reasons to doubt that (or prove it false) generally had the sense to keep their mouths shut, lest their own activities become fair game in retaliation.
I think of the white wedding dress as a fresh start. Like after a snowfall, when everything is white and soft and quiet and peaceful. that is what the simplicity of M’s dress meant for me. The veil was to honour the Commonwealth.
In the picture where K is bending down to C, the very pale yellow (not primrose yellow, cause that’s a pretty vibrant yellow in my garden at least) coat is open at the base and one can CLEARLY SEE A WHITE DRESS UNDERNEATH the coat. So that picture alone negates all deniers of what K wore.
They can’t expect to have thrown this massive globalized wedding for brand Britain and the bride wears a beige suit and hat while the groom is in dress uniform. How ridiculous would that be? If the Sussexes were given the initial small ceremony they wanted, then maybe it would make more sense. The fact is this was watched by over a billion people and Meghan had to dress appropriately. The fact she was married before doesn’t matter. Those complaining aren’t doing it out of respect for tradition but rather to reflect the stance of denying Meghan from the very beginning. It was the start of a pattern of thinking she shouldn’t be allowed what was custom and expected of every other royal bride.
Ok, but why is this woman called “William’s cousin”? She must be Harry’s cousin, too. It’s a weird little thing that sticks out.
She’s Harry and William’s THIRD cousin, if I’ve figured it right. According to the article, “her great-grandfather was King Charles’s beloved great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten of Burma.” So having worked through some of these things in my own family, Mountbatten’s grandchild would be Charles’ second cousin (I think). Mountbatten’s great-grandfather would be Harry and William’s third cousin (I think). Happy to be corrected!
A big thank-you to Ms. Brudenell, and no disrespect to her at all. But it seems weird–and fascinating!–that Eden and the Fail would give a somewhat distant relative any space to say something positive about Meghan.
It’s weird that they even dug her up in the first place. Do they have a giant extended family tree taped on the wall? If they want to dig around for third cousins, King Constantine’s children are third cousins – let’s see what they think about Meghan’s wedding gown. Lol.
What surprises me is that Eden and the Fail are publishing this piece now, and they so very much want to make this point that they’re relying on Harry’s second or third cousin (her great-grandfather was King Charles’s great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten of Burma, so third cousin?). This comes after weeks of channeling dead ladies to convince us Meghan’s wedding dress was an affront to everything royal and decent. Why now? Hmmm….
“Marry in white, and it will go right” according to this article the white wedding dress came into existence because of Queen Victoria, I expected it to be some weird old man but I was wrong..
https://www.elitedaily.com/p/the-reason-brides-wear-white-on-their-wedding-day-might-surprise-you-19274189
Meghans dress and veil were stunning and in popularity the Sussex wedding has topped all the previous ones.. it’s time for the dead woman to rip and stop harassing the living.
I think some old ladies are bitter they “had” to protect their virginity until marriage and women today aren’t under that pressure and have more choices. I don’t see how anyone would get married without test driving their future spouse.
Harry and Meghan were married over SEVEN YEARS AGO. What the heck is wrong with these royalist ‘insider’ rats/cousins of the Queen/whoever they are complaining about the colour of her wedding dress. All solely to get attention off the back of harassing her yet again. It’s frankly quite pathetic. They need to get a grip.