Sentebale is suing Prince Harry & Mark Dyer for defamation

Earlier today, I wrote about how the left-behind Windsors are losing their minds about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s trip to Australia, which starts next week. I mentioned this, and yes, I’m quoting myself: “I also think we’re probably going to get some big anti-Sussex story in this weekend’s Sunday papers. Maybe they’ll go back to that old chestnut, the fakakta bullying allegations.” Wellll, I was sort of right. I get half-credit. Instead of waiting for the Sunday papers, certain people organized something very special in an attempt to derail the Australia trip. Sentebale – meaning, Sentebale’s CEO Sophie Chandauka – is suing Prince Harry and Mark Dyer for defamation. The lawsuit was filed last month but it just became public today. Let the games begin.

A charity co-founded by Prince Harry in honour of his late mother Princess Diana, which he quit following a ​high-profile dispute, is suing the British royal for libel ‌at the High Court in London, a court record showed on Friday.

Harry, the younger son of King Charles, co-founded Sentebale in 2006 to ​help young people with HIV and AIDS in Lesotho ​and Botswana but resigned as a patron in ⁠March 2025 after a public falling-out with its chair of ​the board, Sophie Chandauka.

According to a record made public on Friday, ​Sentebale lodged a defamation claim last month at the High Court against Harry and one of his close friends Mark Dyer, who was also ​a trustee of the charity.

There were no details as ​to what the lawsuit involved. Neither Harry’s spokesperson nor the charity immediately responded ‌to ⁠a request for comment.

The charity’s co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho and the board of trustees joined Harry in leaving Sentebale, which he helped set up nine years after Diana was ​killed in a ​Paris car crash ⁠and which means “forget-me-not” in the local language of Lesotho in southern Africa.

The 41-year-old prince called ​the breakdown in the relationship with Chandauka devastating, ​while ⁠she reported him and the trustees to Britain’s charity regulator for alleged bullying and harassment.

After a review, the Charity Commission reported it had ⁠found ​no evidence of bullying, but said ​there had been weak governance and criticised all parties for allowing an internal ​dispute to become public.

[From Reuters]

What’s funny is that, for the past year, I’ve wanted Harry to pursue legal action against Chandauka. What she’s said about Harry and Meghan specifically was asinine and slanderous, especially the on-the-record quotes she gave to the Financial Times and her on-camera interview with Sky News last year. Her story has changed several times, and she seems grotesquely obsessed with Harry and Meghan. Incidentally, I have no evidence of this, but I’ve believed for some time that Chandauka is being used by people connected to Prince William, including Iain Rawlinson. The timing of this lawsuit backs that up, don’t you think? Anyway, I’m actually glad that this situation is going to court in some form, because I absolutely believe that Harry has plenty of evidence against her.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images. Screencaps courtesy of Sky News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

69 Responses to “Sentebale is suing Prince Harry & Mark Dyer for defamation”

  1. Irisrose says:

    Here’s hoping discovery requires the reveal of

    – any communications between her and Rawlinson

    – any communications between her and any palace or palace flunky

    – revelation of who exactly nominated her for her ribbon and why

    – where exactly all the money went

    – who the hell got her into sentebale in the first place

    • Mac says:

      I hope this gets thrown out so Harry and Meghan never need to hear her name again.

      • Irisrose says:

        Ultimately, I want the backers of this scheme revealed (William, Jason, iain) and Sentebale returned to Harry and Seeiso.

      • 2131Jan says:

        Is this couple EVER going to have any peace and NOT be in court defending themselves against that puerile bother (typo and it stays!) and his minions?? No wonder he won’t work his *actual* job*: he’s too busy thinking of ways to try and hurt Harry and Meg. SUCH an a$$wipe!

      • Lorelei says:

        @IrisRose EXACTLY, my thoughts went there, too.

        The truth always comes out, and apparently no lessons were learned by either the media or the palace colluding with the clusterfck that is Thomas Markle.

  2. Tessa says:

    scooters finger prints all over this one. I hope Harry wins big. Maybe it will lead to an investigation of Chandauka.

    • Debbie says:

      I hope that Harry and Dyer countersue her. She should know what it feels like to be defending herself, that cow. What chutzpah!

  3. Amy Bee says:

    I’m not sure what Sentebale expects to gain from this. And I have questions as to why only Harry and Mark Dyer are being singled out for this lawsuit and where are they getting money to pursue this case?

    • Kaiser says:

      Exactly, Prince Seeiso & Harry coauthored their statement resigning as patrons.

      • Mayp says:

        Yes, I’ve been trying to remember what other public statement Prince Harry has made about Chandauka and Sentebale, outside of his joint statement with Prince Seeiso, and I just can’t remember one. Why would Prince Harry, and Mark Dyer, have allegedly committed defamation but not Prince Seeiso?

        Could this be related to things that Prince Harry and Dyer said or put in writing to the charity commission in defense of Chandauka’s claims against them?

        If so, how is that defamation as it was not “published,” or publicly disseminated (and probably very true!)? At least I can’t see how it would be defamation in the United States. UK legal experts?

        Also, in response to: “I’ve believed for some time that Chandauka is being used by people connected to Prince William, including Iain Rawlinson. The timing of this lawsuit backs that up, don’t you think?”. YES!

        Finally, I agree with those of you that would want this to go to court so that not only all of Chandauka’s misdeeds can come to light but as well the names of those that enabled her (and those paying for her lawsuit!).

    • Gemini says:

      Inclusion of Dyer is proof that this is Scooter King’s doing. Dyer was close to both princes and he stayed loyal to Harry, how dare he? Ruthless Scooter never forgets and never forgives, so we were told just last week.

      • CJW says:

        @Gemini, I agree with you. There is something terribly wrong with William. He is stunted and locked in on a war that is entirely in his head. William seriously needs a mental health intervention, but there is no one in his orbit that will help as most of them need one as well.

  4. Becks1 says:

    Suing someone is a tricky thing because of the discovery process. Also, who is paying for this lawsuit? Sentebale’s coffers were pretty low last I heard.

    • Dee(2) says:

      They were. And there was some very creative PR explanations for their standing cash on hand. I also question the timing of when this lawsuit was filed. 30 days ago seems reactionary.
      And I don’t think they are concerned with the discovery process to be honest. They want a ” scandal” to report on over the next five days. Lawsuits in the UK take year’s to come to trial. This serves as a great distraction for Australia in the immediacy, and for Invictus next summer as a backdrop.

      • Irisrose says:

        Look at the timing.

        30 days ago the first rumor of them visiting Australia hit. They confirmed on March 11. Two days later Bill finally noticed Australia existed and sent a message related to the military there.

        This is an obvious hitjob ordered by William. I’m sure he and Rawlinson colluded with her on this. Had it all ready to go. They were just waiting for a high profile time. Australia visit is it.

        Thats why seeiso isn’t mentioned, only Harry and Mark Dyer who has dared to defy William and stay close to Harry. Bill doesn’t dare go directly against seeiso

      • Mayp says:

        I think the timing is probably explained by the Statute of lLimitations in the UK for defamation, which is one year (not an expert, just googled it!). The suit was filed on March 24th and Harry and Prince Seeiso resigned and issued their public statement on March 25th, 2025. The lawsuit says that Harry and Dyer started to campaign against them on that March 25th date. But it necessarily couldn’t include Harry and Seeiso’s public statement because Seeiso is not being sued.

        Attached below is a link to (sorry) a GB news article that explains the court case more fully.

        It looks like a Samantha Markle lawsuit. In other words, they are suing for either label or slander for essentially reputational damage and how Harry and Dyer’s actions or statements caused them to be cyber bullied. Seriously, does that not sound just like Samantha Markle’s case against Meghan?! 😄😜

        Of note, the article also indicates that Sentebale funds are not being used for the litigation of this lawsuit (???!!!).

        Enjoy:

        https://www.gbnews.com/royal/sentabale-prince-harry-cyber-bullying-scathing-statement

      • Mayp says:

        This is a GB news article that just talks briefly about the lawsuit, in which it is indicated that one of the grievances is that Harry briefed the Press of his departure from Sentebale (by way of his and Seeiso’s statement?) before informing the Sentebale board . What about Seeiso? Why not sue him as well, then?

        If her complaints have anything to do with the statement jointly issued, then her defamation argument is undermined by only suing Harry and not Seeiso.

        Links in this and the above-linked article address other issues regarding this suit as well.

        https://www.gbnews.com/royal/prince-harry-sued-libel-sentebale-royal-feud

    • SpankFD says:

      Exactly. Follow the money to find the culprits.

      Bonus: As C filed the suit, Harry abd Mark get greater leeway during the discovery phase, right?

    • Lorelei says:

      @Becks, agree, everything about this is sketchy

  5. Tessa says:

    Invictus is next. Harry better take large precautions. I hope Harry wins this case.

    • Mayp says:

      I’m with you about being concerned that “they” (William and his cohorts) will try to go after Invictus

      • Lorelei says:

        We know William is stupid and impulsive, but is he really stupid enough to not realize what an appalling look it would be for someone in his position — the future freaking monarch — to be seen in any way as attacking or sabotaging an organization that has helped so many injured veterans? Is he REALLY that dim and shortsighted? Because along with whatever BS articles he briefs and approves will come reminders to the public that his brother served two tours in Afghanistan while Bill plays dress-up anytime he wears a uniform. He’s so blinded by his hatred and jealousy of Harry that he cannot see how bad this crap makes *him* look? On every level? JFC this man is worse than a petulant toddler.

        Honestly, he probably is. Scooter should stick to his MO, just fleeing town to a beach or ski slope like a scared little bitch whenever Harry is in the UK.

      • Bings says:

        They will not go after Invictus. They were hoping for a clear win for them with Sentebale but it has not worked. And then based on that move on to Invictus. But it has not worked out for them. The lawsuit is a distraction from the fact that Sentebale is not able to survive without its founding patrons. Defamation requires intent to cause harm by false statements. As this was Harry and Seesio‘s baby, how exactly does Sophie intend to show the requisite malice on the part of the founders?

  6. Dee(2) says:

    So only sue and Harry and Mark Dyer for libel, even though both patrons stepped down and multiple board members gave interviews about her poor leadership? Mmmhmm. And the fact that they appear to be insolvent, even though she’s paying herself a generous salary would have nothing to do with her wanting to place the blame elsewhere for why the charity is no longer bringing in money?

    Could it be that alienating your sponsors, being so intractable that the founding patrons and existing board members all would rather resign than continue to work with you, causing long time supporters to stop their charitable donations isn’t a great idea for the long-term success of an organization?

    Also, I thought her entire schtick was that she knew better how to raise money than they did? Wouldn’t that stand to reason that she has better connections, people that would back her and trust her character? How could what Harry say impact the ability for her to raise funds unless she never had any connections to begin with?

    I’m exhausted by this nonsense every single time Harry and Meghan have an event coming up. From the Oprah interview, to the Docu Series, Spare, WLM and now this trip. What horrible people that they are just locked in a half a decade later to do whatever they can to ruin the lives of two people who left when they were told to leave.

  7. mightymolly says:

    This is so cruel. This woman hijacked a charity Harry founded in his mother’s memory and gave his heart too, and now she’s dragging him into court over bogus claims?

    I hate that Harry and Meghan can’t get a break. My anxiety could never handle the BS they have to deal with, but it only makes me respect them more.

  8. OriginalMich says:

    She is a literal lunatic.

  9. L4Frimaire says:

    Who is Mark Dyer? Also why not include Prince Seeiso and the rest of the board. This really is more about the Australia trip than Sentebale. They really are torn up about this tour. I think they’ve already messing up by singling out Harry but let the law do its thing. Hope it’s dismissed.

  10. Tessa says:

    Samantha M. sued constantly and got some monetary support apparently to pay for court costs. Cases tossed. But who is financing Chandauka?

    • Irisrose says:

      Assuming this is a rhetorical question.

      We all know william is funding this via the duchy of cornwall.

  11. Tessa says:

    Harry and Meghan should never ever bring their kids to the UK.

  12. Truthiness says:

    I’d really like to know who is funding this woman’s exploits.

    • Me at home says:

      Same. Looking forward to discovery uncovering the “donor” behind this lawsuit.

      Meanwhile, there’s already enough out there to sink Chandauka, in the form of Sentebale’s recent financials. Are Willy and Iain (it’s gotta be them) counting on their tame rota to ignore Chandauka’s financial mismanagement at least during the Sussexes’ Australia trip, and then they cut her loose when they no longer need her?

  13. LauraD says:

    Someone (sorry I forgot who it was) said it’s interesting that the media are going for Meghan and haven’t attacked yet. Well now we know why. These people just can’t help themselves. They’re doing everything they can to undermine Harry and Meghan and what a better time to do it – just before their overseas visit.

    Well I hope the awful woman has been paid well for her treachery because when “they” have no further use for her she will be out in the cold. Her reputation is in tatters and I very much doubt any reputable organisation will touch her with a 10ft bargepole.

    As others have said Harry should have taken the viper to court when all this nonsense first started. If this does go to court I hope it proves without a shadow of a doubt that the woman is a liar and a thief.

  14. IdlesAtCranky says:

    Can anyone here speak to what burden of proof for defamation looks like in the English courts?

    “Call-Me-Doctor” Chandauka really is a poison pill. To have served this organization previously, Sentebale, and seen up close the good work they were doing, to quit, and then to come back in like a human wrecking ball and destroy it? Pure evil.

    And for what? Money? Cozying up to a vindictive, useless person who creates nothing good in the world, like BillyIdle?

    I hope she never gets a decent night’s sleep for the rest of her miserable life.

    And I hope Harry and his excellent legal team do what they do, and shred her into tiny screaming pieces.

  15. Jferber says:

    How clever of Willie to get a Black woman to do his bidding. Maybe he was so impressed with Nikki Minaj that he thought, “You know, this can work for me. I’m a repulsive, racist white man, too!” And voila.

  16. B says:

    Billy thinks that because he can not address multiple issues, adjust in real time or ignore nonsense that others can’t either. He let the Susan Hussey issue derail the Boston visit. He didn’t properly address the discussions about repartitions and colonialism ahead of the Caribbean tour so it was a mess from the first country. Since he can neither lead nor manage he thinks an unexpected event derails everyone like it does it him.

    Harry can both lead and pivot. He’s been building businesses in the US while suing multiple entities for years. Its laughable to think a new lawsuit will impact Harry’s visit. All this will do is give British tabloids something new to lie about as the Sussexes continue to drive them crazy by ignoring them.

  17. jferber says:

    Billy and his dastardly plans against Harry.

  18. zebz says:

    The good thing about this story is that photos of Meghan at this event are being used again. She looked absolutely flawless here. She really made that dress into something, because it was totally different on the model. I’m not surprised it became a Heidi Merrick best seller and sold out multiple times. 10s across the board, and the pictures don’t let the outfit down either. Beautiful scenery and weather. Not to mention Harry looked great on Meghan’s arm.

    I won’t let this lady ruin my feelings on the flawlessness Meghan served here. It was incredible.

    • Irisrose says:

      This is my second favorite of her polo outfits. First being the denim Carolina Herrera (AKA polo baby outfit).

      • Lorelei says:

        @Zebz, same, I’m always glad for an opportunity to see those photos again, so you’ve found a small silver lining. I loved that dress, but could never pull it off like Meghan did. I’m glad lots of other people bought it though, it’s gorgeous.

  19. NoBS Please says:

    This is the new Heritage Foundation US visa nuisance lawsuit. The perfect diversion from Paedy-Andrew for the royals and their media sycophants.

    Harry really should have sued her ass first, he was just too nice. Now she emboldened by the spineless Charity Commission “both siding” the dispute, when it was clearly HER behaviour that was egregious, she’s been funded by someone to strike first.

    Harry should ABSOLUTELY counter-sue, all gloves off!!! I’d say he needs to see Sophia-the-Con as just another NGN or Daily Mail, and go for the jugular.

    Actually he shouldn’t just counter-sue for libel, he and all the other former trustees should get together and sue her for embezzlement and fraud.

  20. MsKrisTalk says:

    Someone wants Harry’s attention really bad. Instead of both princes, they want the baddie prince. They are coming for the swagger ginger who surfs and skis. The one running her mouth and changing her story is suing for defamation. They’re creating a new storyline for the deranged tabloid reporters to eat off of. We’re tired of the tiara gate and crying Kate storylines. This is going to backfire on them big time. Picture the handsome prince strolling into court while the bald headed one runs away.

  21. Al says:

    I have been saying for a long time, and will continue to say, that William and Charles (especially William) will stop at nothing to destroy Harry and Meghan. All of these books and articles, criticizing Harry and Meghan (especially Meghan) are coming straight from the royals. On a large scale, when (not if) H&M succeed, it will call into question the relevance of the entire family and their reliance on public funding. Harry needs to write Spare II. This constant attack is completely crazy.

    • BLACK ELDERBERRY says:

      I have no doubt that William is responsible for the destruction of Sentebale, and there should be a public inquiry into this matter, which will show that, out of personal revenge and envy, he unhesitatingly destroyed the lives and health of nearly 400 children. This should be red headlines on all the world’s websites, and William should be held accountable socially, morally, and legally. His behavior proves that the royal family no longer has a reason to exist, as its only purpose is to exploit its position to destroy people and control institutions for private gain. Charles is writing to other countries to stop providing protection to Harry and his family, stripping him of the house he paid for, revealing his new address and photos of the house, and removing his security. William, taking advantage of his position and the connections that come with it, conceals his actions, which will make our eyes bleed. He casually condemns several hundred children to death by destroying Sentebale, exploiting Chanukah, bribed with a royal medal, an invitation to Earthshot, and unchecked access to Sentebale’s funds, including $1.5 million from SPARE donated by Harry.The existence of the Royal Family is exploited for criminal and corrupt activities by state bodies, such as Ravec, and the institution overseeing charities. Instead of protecting their recipients, it fulfills the will of the palace, in this case William, allowing Chanukah to continue to embezzle Sentebale’s funds and shut down programs that save the lives of hundreds of children.
      These actions are not only socially and morally outrageous, but they are CRIMINAL, subject to numerous criminal laws. William is in a hurry to become king and go unpunished, but for now, it’s time to stop treating royals like sacred cows and start treating them legally like any other citizen. In their privileged position, being and living off money on society,
      they should be setting an example, but instead they are criminals hiding behind their connections.

  22. Jais says:

    Huh. So the royal reporters and media just got a win. Bc hey let’s talk about catnip right? Sophie will be demolished but the BM will be fed. Cool cool cool. All the love to the OG Sentablae team and the Sussex family and all the karma to Sophie and anyone else who is aiding this clown show.

    • kirk says:

      Hmm. Maybe it’s time they rerun all those BS PR interviews she was running around giving with Willyboy Ian Rawlinson by her side.

  23. MsIam says:

    So falsely accusing Harry of bullying is somehow defaming Sentebale? I hope a heaping bus load of bad karma runs these folks into the ground.

  24. Tessa says:

    And the bots and derangers have been let loose on social media and comments sections with the usual gibberish

  25. TN Democrat says:

    I hate to see the paid bots and derangers going after the Sussexes full force again, but the charity commission allowed her to gleefully loot a CHILDREN’S AIDS CHARITY. She should have been grateful she didn’t end up sued or in prison and quietly went onto her next grift. Discovery in a foolish, frivolous lawsuit may be the only way to get justice for the kids she gleefully stole resources from and expose Willy’s behind the scenes shenanigans. Willy is a moron to set this into motion, but his idiocy and obsession with his brother has been on clear display for over a decade. Get ’em, good Prince Henry.

  26. QuiteContrary says:

    I hope this case gets tossed quickly. It should.

  27. YankeeDoodles says:

    WTAF was the Charity Commission doing when they decided to declare there were very fine people on both sides of this dispute??? Their job is to function like a board of trustees for the nonprofit sector in general. So, if a person gets parachuted into an organisation, proceeds to raid their coffers, award herself generous bonuses, and drive the entire founding team into exile, in disgust, whilst making public allegations of misconduct that permanently dent that organisation’s ability to raise money on behalf of its beneficiaries, that’s cool with the Charity Commission??? WTAF.

  28. s808 says:

    Harry & Dryer but no one else? Those 2 are not the only ones who had something to say but they’re the only ones getting sued? Discovery will be interesting.

  29. YankeeDoodles says:

    This. Read this. This is William 100%. It’s so personal. It’s like a crime of passion, in fact, I think it might be the only passion William has ever experienced: https://english.elpais.com/people/2024-02-09/who-is-mark-dyer-and-why-does-the-british-media-think-he-can-bring-princes-harry-and-william-back-together-again.html?outputType=amp

  30. tamsin says:

    I’m not understanding exactly what this law suit is about. The charity is suing for defamation? How was it defamed? And instead of helping the people the charity was set up to help, they are using Harry’s money which he put into Sentebale to sue him? How corrupt and evil is that? What kind of leg would this kind of lawsuit have to stand on? How heartbreaking for Harry. This has got to be thrown out of court, surely.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment