Prince William apparently refused to visit Jamaica after Hurricane Melissa

If you’re a longtime Daily Mail-reader or longtime Mail-analyst, you are familiar with the newspaper’s Ephraim Hardcastle column. The column is written by Mail staffers using the Hardcastle name to protect their sources and drop sometimes-delicious pieces of gossip. What’s interesting about the Hardcastle column is that the Mail stopped publishing it online last year. Nowadays, if you want the real royal dirt, you have to buy a print copy. Unless, of course, someone posts a photo of a juicy piece of gossip in the newspaper. Apparently, Prince William absolutely refused to go to Jamaica after the island was hit by Hurricane Melissa last October.

After his trump in the US, the King departs alone to Bermuda, a trip that hasn’t gone down well in Jamaica. Six months after being devastated by Hurricane Melissa, islanders are still awaiting a royal visit. By contrast, when Hurricane Irma crashed into Antigua in 2017, the King, representing his mother, was on the ground within weeks.

A mole reports that William had been consulted about heading to Kingston on his father’s behalf but “wasn’t inclined” to make the trip. It seems the scars of his 2022 visit, marred by protests, PR missteps and PM Andrew Holness telling him and Kate that the nation would remove the monarchy “in short order,” run deep.

[Transcribed from The Mail’s Hardcastle column, via Twitter]

A similar story emerged last year, where Charles basically had to order William to attend Pope Francis’s funeral, and William tried to get out of it because of… football. Aston Villa. Alongside that, we also heard that William apparently told the Foreign Office that they only get to ask him to make one trip a year, and they used up that “ask” with his (ridiculous) Saudi Arabia trip this year. Lazy, lazy, lazy. My god.

In addition to the (racist, colonialist) ghosts of the 2022 Caribbean Flop Tour, there’s another reason why William is mad about Jamaica – in 2024, Harry and Meghan flew to Jamaica for a movie premiere, and they were greeted warmly by Andrew Holness on the red carpet. The Mail should remember that, since they screamed and cried about it for weeks.

Photos courtesy of Instar, Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “Prince William apparently refused to visit Jamaica after Hurricane Melissa”

  1. Inge says:

    He really is a child throwing tantrums when he’s asked to do his job.

    I’m no fan of Charles but he was out & about a lot more as PoW

  2. Nikki (Toronto) says:

    William only doing one official foreign visit a year is obscene. But I don’t blame him for not going to Jamaica. Don’t go where you’re not welcome.

    Unless he were bringing money to help with recovery, his welcome would have been the same as his last visit to Jamaica.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      I really doubt that many Jamaicans are crushed by William’s absence.

    • Jay says:

      Very true – it’s would be a waste for him to show up for his usual photo ops (using up public funds to boot) when he is not wanted or needed. Now, if he were to come and lead fundraising investment for rebuilding infrastructure, or even encouraging people to travel there to strengthen the tourism industry, that might be useful – but not realistic for TOB.

      I suspect his reasons for refusing to go are more annoyance at being asked to do his job and hurt pride at how he wasn’t received with adulation in 2022. He’s probably like “Well, they don’t want a monarch, why should I travel there?”.

    • Harla says:

      I respectfully disagree, William needs to pull up his big boy pants and go to Jamaica and try to atone for some of the damage he did on the last trip. When he’s the monarch, he’ll frequently be meeting with people who don’t like the monarchy and want to be free from its grasp, so he needs to figure how he is going to work with these people because work with them he must, sitting at home pouting is not an option. Secondly, by making a successful trip to Jamaica, bringing along funds and supplies (because the Sussex’s would) would show everyone that he is aware of the horrible optics of the last trip, is taking it seriously and is willing to learn and do better.

      • Chrissy says:

        Totally agree we the you, Harla. Unfortunately, that would require self-reflection and an admission that the previous trip was an unmitigated PR failure because of Wank’s treating the trip as yet another holiday and not a work event. They did irreparable damage to the BRF’s standing by their behaviour on that trip, and their disrespect for their hosts as well as their racism and longing for the ‘good old days’ reeked of the tone deaf celebration of colonialism.

      • Day Drinker says:

        Yes, supplies. He could throw them rolls of paper towels.

  3. Another lurker says:

    The photo selection is absolutely wicked. Well done!

    • kirk says:

      Yes! Thanks for the reminder that eco-warrior Willy transported that Land Rover all the way from Britain just so they could recreate Betty and Phil’s review of troops from 1962.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    If there was any doubt…it also explained the extreme reaction to Harry and Meghan going to Australia.

    • Lady Digby says:

      Agreed @Moondust this should gain traction and be discussed in BM and all those discussions shows as in why are we paying for an heir unwilling to carry out humanitarian and diplomatic visits visits as and when required by the Government! Why isn’t he earning his keep? Why is he getting away with saying no? Why is he saying no? Is he unwell, unfit, unable due to mental incapacity, lazy, drunk, not interested, has a headache, afraid of failure, can’t appreciate the importance of the Commonwealth, doesn’t care about diplomacy, can’t deal with people who have a different point of view and aren’t deferential to the monarchy? Surely questions need to be asked about workload and appropriate duties for an heir to be relevant, reliable, prepared and used to networking at home and abroad.

  5. another cross to carry says:

    Had willie and kitty been polite to their host, the reception would have been different. They were not the only royals to have visited Jamaica. They were just the only royals who rode in on their high (colonialist and racist) horses and the Jamaican people pressed the “ignore button”!

    Prince Harry has been to Jamaica many times and each time he is treated like the rock star he is!

  6. Lady Digby says:

    I actually think this is very interesting that the Fail reported this at all because the contrast between him and his father is glaring. Once Late Queen hit her 80s her heir did a lot more representing her abroad. The implication of this short article is clear: why isn’t the heir stepping up to represent his monarch abroad. Okay it’s a small report but it is capturing the unease surrounding Will ‘ s stubborn refusal to do his duty when required. King’s speech and behaving diplomatically around Trump has been much admired and won him kudos. Royalists need to point to a King who shows up and gives an effective speech at the behest of the Government . What purpose does Will serve if he fails to travel abroad because someone/ something offended and or hurt his pride? No one imagines that Charles wanted to spend anytime with Trump, let alone undertake a four day visit but he did, no matter how distasteful to him personally, because it was his JOB. Diplomacy and diplomatic foreign visits and tours when required by the Government are the job of king and heir. Will has been badly shown up by both his brother and father within the past few weeks. When is this wimp going to get real and start doing his duty?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment