‘The Gentlemen’ lost millions of viewers & they’re blaming Duchess Meghan

Weeks ago, the rumors about the Duchess of Sussex possibly joining the cast of Guy Ritchie’s The Gentlemen spread like wildfire across the trade papers, the British press and Deranger media. From what I can tell, there were some conversations but nothing was ever offered and nothing was ever nailed down between Ritchie and Meghan. But it absolutely looked like Ritchie used the rumors to promote the show ahead of its Season 2 premiere, and it looked like Netflix used the rumors to greenlight a third season. There was definitely some cynical promotion happening, but it wasn’t on Meghan’s side. Well, after the Gentlemen’s cast all had shady sh-t to say about Meghan during their press junket, it turns out that all of those machinations had a negative effect on viewership. Huh!! Of course, the Telegraph is twisting themselves in knots to blame… Meghan. Who has never stepped foot on this show’s set or said one word about the show.

The Gentlemen has lost half a million viewers in Britain amid rumours that the Duchess of Sussex is in talks to be cast in the next season.

Netflix’s audience appears to have switched off the series in droves, as the latest viewing figures show 500,000 fewer people chose to tune in to the latest instalment of Guy Ritchie’s series than the premiere of the first season.

Season two of the crime drama, which stars Theo James as he “transitions from duke to drug baron” after inheriting his family’s estate and discovering it is home to an underground cannabis empire, premiered on Sept 3.

Audience figures, supplied by the UK’s official ratings agency Barb, dropped by around 15 per cent from the first season’s debut episode, which was streamed by 3.5 million people in March 2024. By contrast, after seven days on the streaming giant, the new season’s first episode has been seen by three million British viewers.

The figures differ from Netflix’s data, which also show a similarly steep decline in viewership of nearly 50 per cent in its opening weekend compared to the first season.

According to Deadline, the show’s second series tallied 6.7 million views in its first four days of availability, almost half of that in 2024, but it has already been renewed by the streaming giant for a third season.

It comes after the news that the Duchess, before her relocation to Britain with Prince Harry last month, was in advanced discussions to join the cast for the next instalment of Ritchie’s show. The Telegraph understood at the time that the offer of the acting role formed part of the decision-making process in the family relocating to the UK with their two children, but was not the sole reason.

[From The Telegraph]

What kind of dumbass analysis is this? I’m really asking. They’re pointing to “casting rumors for a season which hasn’t been filmed yet” as the reason why people are opting out of a Meghan-free season 2? Maybe the show just sucks and viewers are turned off by Theo James’ inherent smarm, and the “Meghan casting rumors” were a hail-Mary scheme to promote a show which had little to no buzz two years since its first season? They’re talking about Meghan like she didn’t star in Suits, a show which gained so much popularity on streaming that multiple articles were written about how people were watching hundreds of millions of hours of a show which had not been on the air in years. The numbers for The Gentlemen show that without Meghan, that show is a total flop. That’s my analysis.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

11 Responses to “‘The Gentlemen’ lost millions of viewers & they’re blaming Duchess Meghan”

  1. Amy Bee says:

    So is the Telegraph saying that the show flopped because viewers found out that Meghan wasn’t in season 2? I’m confused. As I’ve said before, hope Meghan got a cheque for all that free promotion that the show got.

    • Eurydice says:

      I think they’re saying that people are boycotting the show because maybe, possibly, it was rumored, that Meghan might have been approached to be on the show – as in, see how toxic she is?

      I abandoned the show halfway through the first season because it was obvious where things were going and I got bored. But, to tell the truth, by the time this whole kerfuffle started I had totally forgotten even the name of the show – and then I was like, “oh, that thing?”

  2. C-Shell says:

    FFS, what ISN’T Meghan’s fault??!! Avocado toast anyone? KKKan’t’s “cancer”??!! It’s pathetic and ridiculous, at this point.

  3. sunny says:

    This is so silly.

    The likely reason the show lost millions of views isn’t the gossip. It’s becuase they took way too long to come back between seasons. There has been all sorts of discussion lately on the impact of Netflix taking years to launch additional seasons of shows that were initially hits and the resulting drops in viewerships and people forget shows they were once excited about with so much competition in the market. This seems like a great case of that. Geez. It’s not Meghan, it is the Netflix model.

    Trying to scapgoat Meghan for this instad of talking about the challenge for shows to keep consistent viewership within the streaming model is such a miss.

    • Elizabeth says:

      One reason Slow Horses is so good and has such a following is that there has been no lag between seasons. They finish one season, take a few months off, then start filming the next. Season 6 is about to premiere, and they’ve already finished filming season 7.

  4. Aimee says:

    I’m watching season 2 as I am a fan of the show but I don’t binge anything and like to take my time. I’m only on episode 3.

  5. Amie says:

    I hadn’t even heard of this show until Meghan’s name was attached, so the idea that Meghan has anything to do with the drop is dumb. Obviously the show was not that good in the second season.

    The British press is so lame.

  6. Julie says:

    Maybe UK viewers are simply fed up with aristocrat gangsters and their privileges. Life is hard for many in the UK and maybe they need something more positive on tv.
    Many reasons can explain this and none have anything to do with Meghan. However, using Meghan sell.

  7. Over it says:

    My heart really does go out to Meghan . how the f do you blame someone for something they never had a part of . I am with Kaiser analysis. And Theo seems like an ass of the hole so glad the show tanked .

  8. koko says:

    I broke a nail yesterday and forgot my Aunts birthday. I’d like to blame Meghan.

  9. Jessieheels77 says:

    I watched it last week when it came out and I actually thought it was genius on whoever’s part it was to bring Meghan’s name into the promotion. Because there are so many parallels between the brothers in the story and Harry and William. Don’t want to spoil it for anyone who wants to see it and hasn’t but there’s even a moment where Theo James’ character is called “darling boy” after a tragedy caused by the person who’s called him darling boy. It actually gave me a bit of a chill because it was so on the nose.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment