A royal cousin defends Duchess Meghan’s right to wear white to her 2018 wedding

For the better part of a month, the royal reporters have been obsessed with the late Lady Liza Anson, who died in 2019. Anson was Queen Elizabeth II’s cousin and friend, and Anson was a favorite gossip source for many royal reporters, as it turns out. She was “a source close to QEII” or perhaps just a “royal source.” In her last years, Anson had a major grudge against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The Sussexes didn’t hire her to plan any part of their wedding (Anson was a party planner) and so, as punishment, Anson told lots of reporters about QEII’s fury with Harry and Meghan. According to Anson, QEII had to “give up her solitude” in a 1,000-room Norman castle when she rented Frogmore Cottage to the Sussexes. Anson was especially pissed about everything involving the Sussexes’ wedding, and she claimed that QEII was as well. QEII was allegedly big mad that Meghan A) wore a veil, B) wore white, and C) refused to tell QEII about every single part of the wedding planning.

At no point during all of this third-hand hearsay and gossip-mongering has anyone over there acknowledged that, actually, the queen was in the wrong. If Anson’s gossip is correct, QEII was throwing a tantrum over her grandson’s wife-to-be wearing a white gown to a globally-televised royal wedding. No one has said “well, Meghan had the right to do whatever she wanted, it was her wedding after all.” Then, weirdly, the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden put this item in his column:

Meghan Markle’s choice of dress for her second wedding, to Prince Harry, is said to have caused Queen Elizabeth to raise an eyebrow. The late Queen is reported to have thought her gown was ‘too white’ for a divorcee.

Prince William’s cousin has, however, defended Meghan’s choice and explained why she, too, wore an ivory gown for her own second wedding.

Maddison May Brudenell – whose great-grandfather was King Charles’s beloved great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten of Burma – exchanged vows with Canadian welder Bret Kapetanov last November. And Maddison reveals that she had to overcome the opposition of her mother, Edwina Hicks.

The model, 31, says: ‘In the monarch’s view, it was not appropriate for a divorcee getting remarried in church to look quite so flamboyantly virginal. My mother, our late Queen’s goddaughter, had said exactly the same to me, and that other family members would agree.’

Maddison, who previously ran off to be secretly married to a DJ, Olaoluwa Modupe-Ojo, wore a bespoke white dress by Laura Green, of Modern Bride, for her wedding to Kapetanov.

Of her frank conversation with her mother, she says: ‘I was sad to think about the painful past during what I wanted to be a joyful, future-focused time of my life. But I understood the notion. My mum was speaking out of love. I didn’t let my feelings overcome me – we talked about it.’

‘However, as I told my mother, we may as well splash muddy water, drip some blood, sweat and tears on it for good measure. As it happens, my dress did have a lot of unique components, but these were because of what I chose and not in any way what I felt I must choose. My mother listened to my wisdom and respected my style.’

[From The Daily Mail]

This is actually completely normal – an older relative has super-conservative opinions about weddings, and the bride says “okay, granny, but I’m still going to do what I want because it’s my wedding,” and the granny just has to deal. As I’ve said this whole time, I can understand why a woman of QEII’s generation would have thoughts and opinions about “which brides can wear white.” It’s the weaponization of those opinions which bugs me, and using a dead queen’s memory to bash Meghan for “making her own choices for her wedding.” There were literally dozens of royal reporters writing ghastly sh-t about Meghan in the past month, all because one dead woman said another dead woman was “furious, confused and HURT” by Meghan’s choice to wear white SEVEN YEARS AGO.

PS… if we’re getting into conservative wedding rules about who can and cannot wear white, I find it remarkable that QEII seemingly had no opinion about the then-Duchess of Cambridge wearing white to another woman’s wedding.


.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

31 Responses to “A royal cousin defends Duchess Meghan’s right to wear white to her 2018 wedding”

  1. Blogger says:

    Oh dear, even Dick is avoiding mentioning the great Greek holiday rort and instead digs up a random unknown Mountbatten cousin to resurrect a non-issue over an historic wedding dress.

    What possibly could Dick be deflecting from?

  2. Tessa says:

    Keen is looking daggers at the wedding. If the queen looked at every aspect of the wedding why did she not speak up over keens tantrums before the wedding

  3. Amy Bee says:

    Didn’t Anne and Camilla wear white to their second weddings? All this says to me is the Queen was a busy body who was stuck in her old ways.

    • FlamingHotCheetos2021 says:

      Anne wore a white jacket over a white midi dress. Camilla wore…basically the same thing, for the civil ceremony, but for the ‘blessing ceremony’ in an actual church she wore a shiney….like, peacock greige thing?

  4. Sophia says:

    Nobody’s opinion matters. Bride wants to wear white who gives two F’S if she’s a virgin or whatever outdated opinion anyone has. Stupid

  5. Jan says:

    When a woman allows her husband to have a side piece, that she have to invites to functions, she is no positive, to tell another woman what to wear to their wedding.
    I’m so proud of Meghan for not letting that old hag plan her wedding, or telling the queen the details about her dress.

    • Gtwiecz says:

      Very true. Lived in a pretend marriage for decades, just like her grandson the heir is doing. No wonder Phillip’s will is locked up for decades. I’m just wondering if she had her own side pieces.

  6. Dee(2) says:

    I guess great, but whether it’s a defense or opposition I wouldn’t care either way about someone this distantly and tangentially related’s opinion. It’s my wedding not yours, and this idea of virginal and white is gross too. And pretty silly in this day and age.

    Lady Anson like so many others saw Meghan’s popularity and thought that they could latch on and boost themselves with it. And then got angry because Meghan was a fully formed adult woman with her own ideas, but also her own connections and contacts and didn’t need to rely on them for things for the wedding. And I think that’s what irked. She wasn’t babe in the woods and could point to her own life experience and knowledge to counter them.

    • sevenblue says:

      It was Harry who rejected her services, but of course like always, they blamed Meghan for it.

      • DWI says:

        can you imagine w/ that so-called ‘lady’ would have said if she did work on the wedding???!!!!!

  7. Jais says:

    LOL, yeah when are we gonna get the queen’s opinion on Kate wearing a dress that photographed as a cream/white at Meghan’s wedding. Especially after Kate threw a tantrum over bridemaids dresses and acted like a bridezilla when she wasn’t even the bride. Not to mention lying about it to the press later to make herself the victim. Those are some seriously poor behaviors. But sure let’s talk about how Meghan wore a white dress for her wedding/s.

    • somebody says:

      Well, why was Kate wearing white at her own wedding after shacking up with William? Or Sophie? Didn’t she live with Edward before marrying?

      • jais says:

        valid questions. Bc if white is for purity…lol. It’s apparently a specific issue about divorce and the church which to me is whatever.

  8. sunnyside up says:

    How many brides these days are virgins when they marry, both my DILs had a baby before marriage, both in white. White only became fashionable for wedding gowns because Queen Victoria wore white for her wedding, I wonder who decided that white was only for virgins.

  9. sevenblue says:

    I don’t believe QE2 at her age was bitching about H&M’s wedding all day. What I think happened, this woman bad-mouthed H&M to QE2 because Harry rejected her services and QE2 either didn’t say anything or just nodded, which she took as QE2 agreeing with her and leaked the reporters that QE2 said all that sh*t. From every interaction QE2 had with Meghan, she approved of her. If she thought of Meghan like this, she would pay Meghan zero attention publicly like she did to Kate multiple times in front of the cameras.

    • FlamingHotCheetos2021 says:

      Honestly, I could see Queenie thinking for a moment that it was a bit much for a second-time bride because Queenie was born in 1926 to the most conservative family in the most conservative social circle imaginable, but dear GOD the woman would never say so!

  10. somebody says:

    Supposedly hundreds of people live in Windsor Castle-retired military who take part in some things and staff. Then there are all the houses leased out on the estate and tourists coming through. Adelaide is nearly the same distance as FC from the castle, so no moaning about W&K invading her privacy? Only the biracial woman impinged on her privacy? And only inappropriate for Meghan to wear white and not Kate who shacked up with Will before marrying? Get back to me on wedding attire when they come up with something to indicate the man is a virgin.

    • Noor says:

      Exactly. If the white wedding dress is to symbolise virginity then the late Queen should also frowned at Kate Middleton as she should not wear white at her wedding too.

      • DWI says:

        and kate dodged getting checked by a doctor to make sure her hymen was intact. guess cause it wasn’t!

  11. Maxine Branch says:

    Were there ever in virgins to marry into that family other than Harry’s mother? From what I have read, there have not been any others

    • FlamingHotCheetos2021 says:

      Well, I think before Charles’s generation got to marriageable age it was just sort of assumed…and anyone who had any reasons to doubt that (or prove it false) generally had the sense to keep their mouths shut, lest their own activities become fair game in retaliation.

  12. Gail Hirst says:

    I think of the white wedding dress as a fresh start. Like after a snowfall, when everything is white and soft and quiet and peaceful. that is what the simplicity of M’s dress meant for me. The veil was to honour the Commonwealth.

    In the picture where K is bending down to C, the very pale yellow (not primrose yellow, cause that’s a pretty vibrant yellow in my garden at least) coat is open at the base and one can CLEARLY SEE A WHITE DRESS UNDERNEATH the coat. So that picture alone negates all deniers of what K wore.

  13. L4Frimaire says:

    They can’t expect to have thrown this massive globalized wedding for brand Britain and the bride wears a beige suit and hat while the groom is in dress uniform. How ridiculous would that be? If the Sussexes were given the initial small ceremony they wanted, then maybe it would make more sense. The fact is this was watched by over a billion people and Meghan had to dress appropriately. The fact she was married before doesn’t matter. Those complaining aren’t doing it out of respect for tradition but rather to reflect the stance of denying Meghan from the very beginning. It was the start of a pattern of thinking she shouldn’t be allowed what was custom and expected of every other royal bride.

  14. Eurydice says:

    Ok, but why is this woman called “William’s cousin”? She must be Harry’s cousin, too. It’s a weird little thing that sticks out.

    • Me at home says:

      She’s Harry and William’s THIRD cousin, if I’ve figured it right. According to the article, “her great-grandfather was King Charles’s beloved great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten of Burma.” So having worked through some of these things in my own family, Mountbatten’s grandchild would be Charles’ second cousin (I think). Mountbatten’s great-grandfather would be Harry and William’s third cousin (I think). Happy to be corrected!

      A big thank-you to Ms. Brudenell, and no disrespect to her at all. But it seems weird–and fascinating!–that Eden and the Fail would give a somewhat distant relative any space to say something positive about Meghan.

      • Eurydice says:

        It’s weird that they even dug her up in the first place. Do they have a giant extended family tree taped on the wall? If they want to dig around for third cousins, King Constantine’s children are third cousins – let’s see what they think about Meghan’s wedding gown. Lol.

  15. Me at home says:

    What surprises me is that Eden and the Fail are publishing this piece now, and they so very much want to make this point that they’re relying on Harry’s second or third cousin (her great-grandfather was King Charles’s great-uncle, Earl Mountbatten of Burma, so third cousin?). This comes after weeks of channeling dead ladies to convince us Meghan’s wedding dress was an affront to everything royal and decent. Why now? Hmmm….

  16. Hypocrisy says:

    “Marry in white, and it will go right” according to this article the white wedding dress came into existence because of Queen Victoria, I expected it to be some weird old man but I was wrong..
    https://www.elitedaily.com/p/the-reason-brides-wear-white-on-their-wedding-day-might-surprise-you-19274189

    Meghans dress and veil were stunning and in popularity the Sussex wedding has topped all the previous ones.. it’s time for the dead woman to rip and stop harassing the living.

  17. Gabby says:

    I think some old ladies are bitter they “had” to protect their virginity until marriage and women today aren’t under that pressure and have more choices. I don’t see how anyone would get married without test driving their future spouse.

  18. LadyBreenie says:

    Harry and Meghan were married over SEVEN YEARS AGO. What the heck is wrong with these royalist ‘insider’ rats/cousins of the Queen/whoever they are complaining about the colour of her wedding dress. All solely to get attention off the back of harassing her yet again. It’s frankly quite pathetic. They need to get a grip.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment