The Epstein Files have become such a rolling catastrophe for the Windsors, to the point where I doubt that any of the “Yorks” are going to come out unscathed. King Charles has attempted to cauterize the issue, blaming everything on Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, while simultaneously “saving” Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie and allowing them to be semi-royals or half-in royals. Beatrice and Eugenie live in royal homes – Eugenie lives in Ivy Cottage in the Kensington Palace complex, and Beatrice has an apartment at St. James’s Palace – but they also have non-royal homes (just in case). They are allowed some semi-royal patronages but they’re not considered working royals. They’re welcome at family events, like Christmas at Sandringham. But given how much is coming out about how Sarah and Andrew included their daughters in their depraved relationships with Jeffrey Epstein, it feels like Bea and Eugenie are going to find themselves out in the cold. The Daily Mail’s columnists have been turning on the princesses for months now, and Richard Eden’s latest column is yet more evidence that B&E are pretty much done.

Part of the reason I’d always been sympathetic to Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie was that they seemed sensible and level-headed whenever I met them at London parties. It struck me as unfair for them to be tainted by the failings of their parents, the former Duke and Duchess of York. However, the more I read of the three million documents in the Jeffrey Epstein files, the more disturbed I am by how much they knew about the late sex offender and how little they did about it.

After Prince Andrew’s disastrous interview at Buckingham Palace with BBC Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis in 2019, it was reported that Beatrice had advised her father to take part. Indeed, she was said to have attended a meeting at the palace with the BBC producers who persuaded Andrew to agree. Then, I found it hard to believe that Bea, as she’s known to friends, could have been involved because it was such a foolish decision. But when it was confirmed to be the case, I persuaded myself that she must have done so out of a touching belief in the innocence of her father, and that she must have been desperate for him to convince the nation he had been involved in no wrongdoing just as he had clearly convinced her. Now, I am not so sure.

First, it was revealed that the princess, then aged 20, joined her sister and mother on a visit to Miami in 2009 to visit Epstein less than a week after he was released from prison. The American financier was under house arrest at the time, having served 13 months of an 18-month sentence for procuring a child for prostitution after a parent reported that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter. Epstein had pleaded guilty to the revolting crime. Two days after he walked free from jail, Epstein gave permission for the mother and daughters’ airline tickets to be purchased for a total of $14,000 (£10,000).

The Epstein files show extensive contact between Epstein and Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew from then onwards. The following year, Andrew went to stay with Epstein at his New York apartment. In his Newsnight interview, Andrew told Maitlis that he went there only to inform Epstein that he would be having nothing more to do with him. However, emails from the Epstein files show that this was a lie. In fact, their creepy contact continued for years.

I believe that Beatrice knew her father had lied when he said this. The fact that she had accompanied her mother to celebrate the sex offender’s release shows that her parents had no intention of cutting ties with him. Quite the opposite: they hoped to continue benefiting from his generosity. Surely Eugenie too must have been aware of the true position. That jolly trip to Florida is not, moreover, the only disclosure in the files that has persuaded me Beatrice and Eugenie knew their father told a pack of lies to the nation from the palace.

Having defended Beatrice and Eugenie for so many years, I feel guilty for having acted as one of their media cheerleaders. I fear they have betrayed my trust and betrayed the nation for allowing, or even encouraging, their father to lie to the nation. It is time for the sisters to speak out about what they know and order their father to start telling the truth, to the police and to the authorities in the USA. And time for our head of state, King Charles, to cut off all funding to his greedy, lying brother until he does so.

[From The Daily Mail]

I have to admit… Eden’s not wrong here, in this particular situation. I’ve defended B&E as well, and I’m still sympathetic towards them because of their frankly despicable parents. But it does sound like Beatrice (in particular) needs to answer some questions about what she knew and when, and how many times she met Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and what kind of advice she gave to her parents regarding this whole situation. Many commenters pointed out that Beatrice was probably more involved in her parents’ mess because she’s the eldest daughter. There’s something to that, because Eugenie doesn’t seem to be as consistently mixed up in this sh-t. Anyway, it sure sounds like Beatrice and Eugenie are going to get kicked out of Ivy Cottage and St. James’s Palace. They probably won’t be invited to Easter… or Trooping the Colour… or Christmas at Sandringham.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Instar and Cover Images.