Liz Jones: Princess Kate’s face ‘must be aching with all the performative gurning’

This Daily Mail column certainly got buried in a hurry. I’m surprised I even saw it, that’s how quickly it was downgraded by the Mail’s (manipulated) royal-gossip feed. The Daily Mail’s Liz Jones decided to be the lone royal columnist to rip into the Prince and Princess of Wales in recent days. You see, last week’s Variety hit-job on the Sussexes led to a massive pile-on in the British media, as they screamed and wailed about Prince Harry and Meghan 24-7. Liz Jones was like… please remember that William and Kate suck too. She went off on Will and Kate’s state-banquet portrait and the fact that there was a state banquet at all. In her absolutely correct assessment, William and Kate should be doing a lot more than playing dress-up and being bitchy to Princess Eugenie and Beatrice.

It was meant to be a grand State Banquet in honour of the president of Nigeria and his wife. A display of pomp and ceremony, business as usual, with senior royals in attendance at Windsor Castle, topped off, after a lavish meal with canapes and mocktails, with the release of a brand new Official Portrait of the Prince and Princess of Wales in all their finery. What was not to like?

Well, quite a lot, if the comments readers left below our online coverage on Thursday morning are anything to go by. The reactions to the rather stiff, formal photograph of William and Catherine – she in Diana’s tiara, wearing a gown in Nigerian green by celebrity designer Andrew Gn – were far from glowing. One asked: ‘And this benefits the British public, how?’

‘Another taxpayer-funded knees-up for the elite,’ came another, adding: ‘They are not hanging about spending our money this year.’ And: ‘Those are waxworks, aren’t they?’ ‘Criminal, given all that is going on in the world.’

To be frank, the commentators have not got it wrong. Is this really the right time for a State Banquet, with photos posted online of the elaborate, over-the-top tablescaping that would put Downton Abbey to shame? This, when ordinary Brits already weighed down by the cost of living, worry about what is to come in the Middle East and how it will affect their energy bills, food shop and mortgages. And do we really need yet another ‘Official Portrait’, this one taken by a young Nigerian-born photographer, Christianah Ebenezer? Perhaps the Palace thought that the wide grins of the Prince and Princess of Wales would gloss over the Royal Family’s tone-deaf roboticism of recent weeks.

I imagine Kate’s face must be aching with all the performative gurning. There the couple were at the recent Baftas, failing to read the room that was more concerned with their Uncle Andrew’s arrest. Facing accusations of misconduct in public office, his homes had been searched and his emails scoured, yet on the Waleses ploughed.

There was Kate again, beaming as she handed out shamrocks to members of the Irish Guards and their Irish wolfhound mascot on St Patrick’s Day. But who cares? Is this the most urgent thing she could think to spend time on?

William, too, has been out and about in public: most notably, he appeared on a podcast to discuss his own male mental anguish when serving as a search and rescue pilot. Yet a heartfelt statement expressing support for the victims of Andrew’s friend, the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, came there none. Merely expressing your agreement for King Charles’s terse statement following Andrew’s arrest does not cut the mustard.

William and Kate’s down-with-the-people routine – ordinary, relatable, open and honest about mental health, cancer, being parents – rings hollow when they keep schtum over a senior member of their family behaving badly. It isn’t enough to shun their cousins Eugenie and Beatrice – which amounts to little more than banning the sisters from royal carriage rides at Ascot and Sandringham Christmases. Oh, boo hoo. Those privileges mean nothing to the rest of us.

The Royal Family is in crisis and William and Kate are behaving like ostriches. They need to step up, stop hiding behind medals, jewels and portrait photographers. Being a senior royal, our future monarchs, means more than rubbing shoulders with Leo DiCaprio at the Baftas as though nothing has changed. Because everything has changed: we need reassurance, gravitas, action, real consequences. What did you know and when? And why did you do nothing about the Andrew problem until your hands were forced?

It’s little wonder that people are beginning to see William and Kate as mannequins – and not just in their Official Portrait. Show us how worried you are. Tell us how sorry you are. Stop being myopic. You are young parents; you have a daughter, for goodness’ sake. The time for ceremony and protocol is over, because you need to be frank with us: we can take it!

[From The Daily Mail]

LMAO. And this is why there’s been such an uptick in attacks on the Sussexes too – it’s not just that Harry and Meghan are more interesting and charismatic, it’s not just that the Sussex-smear machine is a billion-dollar industry. The Sussex pile-ons happen because few of these people are capable of speaking about William and Kate’s profound inadequacies. William and Kate are two 40-somethings who think the sum total of their “jobs” is “wearing fancy clothes and working one day a week.” They haven’t said anything about Andrew or Jeffrey Epstein because they have nothing to say, at least nothing which wouldn’t leave more questions than answers. Also: notice how basically no one in the British press mentions the complete lack of engagement with the Windsors these days. At event after event, there are empty barricades and normal people ignoring the f–k out of the Windsors. The biggest crowds they get are from Republic protesters calling them “parasites.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Kensington Palace’s social media.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

41 Responses to “Liz Jones: Princess Kate’s face ‘must be aching with all the performative gurning’”

  1. Hypocrisy says:

    This is where the focus should be, not on the Sussex’s.. I loved that she pointed out that WanK have stayed silent and they have a daughter that is the age of a lot of Epsteins and his clients victims..but it wasn’t just little girls there is evidence in those files that may young boys were victims also.. silence equals guilt and the longer they remain silent the worse they look.

  2. another cross to carry says:

    Their salty tears are so delicious. They all knowingly bet on the wrong couple and when the obvious happens they begin to throw tantrums. Poo’ ol’ dem! So satisfying to watch them braise in their evil juices.

  3. Trex says:

    Oh my. This does not bode well. The only thing which could save the mood out there is IF they did an about face on Harry and Meghan – OR another they decided to show some level of affection for one another.

  4. Gemini says:

    After reading this, Scooter will be announcing he is a “quiet” “girl dad”.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      One thing they are not: “young parents”??? Wtf
      They are parents to young kids yes but definitely not young parents- They’re gonna be approaching 50! How long are they gonna be listening and learning and maing believe they are starting at life?? Losers

  5. I love how her article has used the comments section to prove just how un-necessary the Wails are and how little people think of them!! More of this please!

  6. Sharon says:

    William is president of Bafta, and never issued any statements. There’s an ostrich for you. Kate had watched one movie, the night before the ceremony (lol) so that she would have something to say when asked about the nominated films. They spoke of a “long list to get to” and you know they’re not going to watch any of them. That’s your Bafta Pres. who can’t even be bothered to know anything.

    • Cosmo says:

      I’m so baffled by how these two spend their time. They don’t work, their kids are in school full time, they don’t watch movies… I guess I can picture Kate on the sofa watching Real Housewives all day.

      • Giddy says:

        Well, she also has the huge job of monitoring Meghan’s clothes, then sourcing them. It’s exhausting I tell you! Poor thing.

      • Chrissy says:

        I think she still spends a lot of time scheming and shopping and pampering herself with her mother! William spends it hate scrolling and day drinking.

  7. Jais says:

    My thing is people keep demanding answers from the Wales about what they knew. And from Charles. But the public isn’t getting answers bc they wouldn’t like the answers. They knew. They all knew. And they’ve always believed they’re protected from consequences. The end. There’s your answers.

  8. Eurydice says:

    I wonder if W&K are allowed to talk about Andrew and Epstein – like, is BP controlling what the RF can say? Or maybe they’re distancing themselves in attempt to stay clean.

    I also wonder if it isn’t too late for W&K to be anything other than what they are. If they had gravitas, capability, empathy, purpose, they would have shown it by now. And it’s hard to be relevant in a rigid system whose main purpose for existing is no longer relevant.

    • IdlesAtCranky says:

      @Eurydice

      I agree that if BillyIdle and Can’t had anything to offer we’d have seen it by now.

      But I disagree that one cannot be relevant within the rigidity of the royal system. Diana did. Harry did. Meghan did and she was only there for five minutes! Even Charles, for all his many many flaws & failures, evidently did some good work with the Prince’s Trust and environmental advocacy.

      I think the system makes it easy to be spoiled, self-centered, and basically useless. But a person with any sense of duty, of ambition to do good for others, to serve, will find ways to do so. As those we admire say, Service is universal!

  9. JanetDR says:

    Calling out Kate for showing up for the Irish guards as unimportant seems unfair. She actually got off her duff and did something!
    But, yes, keep this attitude coming!

    • Lorelei says:

      @Janet I was just about to say the same thing! I cannot believe I’m defending this woman, but if Kate hadn’t shown up on St. Patrick’s Day, she would have faced even worse criticism for that, too. I agree with the rest of this article, but going after Kate for attending an event that is specifically her duty seems like a little too much. Kate was absolutely piled on the year she missed it!

    • Me at home says:

      ITA. Kate did two things that show up on her calendar every year as her duties (this Guards event and BAFTAs after watching one of the movies, lol). That’s after telling the Guards a few years ago, “don’t expect me to do this every year.” So yay?

      I guess the point is that she should be doing stuff *in addition to* what’s absolutely required of her, i.e besides doing the minimum around BAFTA and the Guards. Mumble a speech about aahly yaahs (has anything happened with that yet in 2026?) or something.

  10. Cee says:

    Indifference will kill the Monarchy. The Queen knew this and yet she gave certain people too much freedom to do as they pleased, and now the public does not care at all. The only couple worth seeing was exiled and smeared.

  11. Dee(2) says:

    This is harsh, but I feel like this is the Wales’ tax instead of the Sussex tax. They must have one or two articles occasionally actually calling out the Wales’, and then they go back to business as usual.

    The weird thing from a business standpoint to me though is pointing out the obvious, like was done in this article, and for example the fact that there was a photo of only one person behind the barricade as the carriages were doing their procession at Windsor would likely get more attention.

    I know that the argument is that it’s all about access, but as rightfully pointed out in this article, what does access to the Windsor really get you any longer? This isn’t Charles and Diana, or Queen Elizabeth. There’s nothing interesting about William and Kate, there’s nothing interesting about Edward and Sophie, and describing Anne as taciturn is being generous.

    Andrew if he has decent lawyers isn’t going to speak to you on the record after the last time he went on the record in an interview, and Charles and Camilla are too set in their ways to make it worthwhile, plus they’re already the monarchs.

    From a media perspective I just feel like they would have more control if they did articles like this more often, and use the possibility of Sussex tax articles as enticement to get them to provide actual content. But it’s probably too late for that. They spent the last 10 years feasting on Meghan and Harry, William and Kate are probably lazier than can be fixed

    • Lorelei says:

      @Dee, ITA. The “access” argument has never made much sense to me, because the BRF needs the media far more than the media needs them. They’re not going to start banning the ROTA from their engagements because the only reason they DO any engagements in the first place is to garner coverage and hopefully make the front pages.

      William is pettyAF so I can see him trying it, and just bringing along a chosen photographer, but even he would see how quickly that would bite him in the ass if he tried it.

      The BM would revolt and the silent contract would fall by the wayside if William tried to cut the press out altogether. From the rumors we’ve heard about William, it sounds like he desperately needs the press to continue covering for him and keeping his dirt hidden. If he cut off all access, they would have no reason to keep protecting him. (Although we all know Bill isn’t exactly the brightest bulb, so maybe he actually will try it, and learn the hard way that this is one area he simply cannot control.)

    • Eurydice says:

      Access to the Windsors now reminds me of that old saying, “That and a dime will get you a cup of coffee.” (Although, now it’s $4)

      I don’t know that it’s just being boring that’s taken the bloom off the rose, I think the Epstein blight is creeping in. When royal chasers like Edo are finding all sorts of important things to do on the other side of the world…I wonder.

    • Becks1 says:

      The access argument is interesting, because on the one hand – like you and Lorelei said – they need the press as much (if not more) than the press needs them. If they cut the press out of their events, then their events won’t get coverage.

      But we have seen them going around the press before – not releasing the kids’ birthday photos to the press and instead going directly to social media is a big one that the press was mad about. So I can see William getting pissed off at the DM or the Express or whatever paper and cutting them out of the events. But with the rota system, that doesn’t matter as much and I don’t think William can control who participates in the rota.

      And I don’t think they’d ever go so far as to cut the press out entirely.

      So it seems the access is safe. Maybe Liz Jones won’t be invited to the next earthshot – but she was never going to be.

      And at a certain point you need to ask what the access brings you anyway if you can’t print what actually happens at events, if you can’t accurately portray William’s comments or talk about the non existent crowds etc.

    • Me at home says:

      Very good point. In the Diana days, for example, when the royal family went on ski trips, they’d give the rota some good photo ops of the kids in their ski gear on the first day, then the rota would go away and leave the royal family in peace. William and Kate won’t even do that anymore. Supposedly for security reasons, although of course we know the secrecy has a lot to do with how many vacations the Waleses take, and in whose Mustique getaway or on whose yacht.

      So what is the rota getting out of this little bargain nowadays? And what’s the worst that could happen from breaking the unwritten bargain?
      – KP needs the rota more than the rota needs KP. As pps have said, the only reason the lazies leave their mansions is to get papped.
      – Are rota “journalists” really too lazy to watch Twitter for someone to report a Wales appearance, in the (highly unlikely) event KP gets so annoyed it stops alerting them?
      – And would it be the end of the world if nobody at Borough Market cared enough to tweet an alert that the Waleses had shown up (still thinking of that Queen eating her sandwich).
      – Frankly, an honest, hard-hitting investigation into Andrew or BRF finances might get more real engagement than anything about the Waleses at Borough Market. (Maybe Eden et al. are incapable of examining actual figures and facts, though?) This wouldn’t have to be a one-time thing, instead they could spin out the many, many suspect things about BRF finances, and then spin out the fallout with the public and Parliament about continuing their privileges, tax exemptions, and the rest. Right now, advertisers must know that the Fail comment section is running on fumes and bots.

  12. Nikki (Toronto) says:

    I think part of the uptick in anti-Meghan articles is a distraction, but much of it is due to the upcoming Invictus “one-year-away” event. If Harry and Meghan show up, and there are huge crowds, the jig is up. I think Kensington is desperate for Meghan not to show.

  13. Elly says:

    I think the palace believes that ignoring Andrew’s crimes will still work. “Never complain, never explain”. That’s what they did for the last 20-30 years and it worked so they’re sticking with it. They think the plebes have short memories and will forget. They will distract the common people with shiny objects, pomp, medals, tiara’s and fancy clothes.

  14. Becks1 says:

    This line – “William and Kate’s down-with-the-people routine – ordinary, relatable, open and honest about mental health, cancer, being parents – rings hollow when they keep schtum over a senior member of their family behaving badly” – OUCH. And she’s right. I would also say their “we’re so ordinary” routine rings hollow when they release a picture wearing fake medals and a diamond and pearl tiara.

    My big takeaway from this is that even hardcore royalists are bored by W&K, and being bored is a problem. They want something different from them – more modern, more active, more….SOMETHING.

    And instead they’re getting the same old same old, but somehow William and Kate come across as more boring than Charles and Camilla. They’re so obsessed with protecting their privacy that it feels we know nothing authentic about them and that just makes it worse, because they just come across as very flat and dull.

    • Tessa says:

      Scooter and Keen are not relatable. For one thing he preaches about the homeless and at the same time grabs various mansions. The family goes on lavish vacations (yachts). ANd his fuss about the school run and heaven forbid they do some royal work while the kids are in school.

  15. Amy Bee says:

    At this point the Royal Family is just being propped up by the newspaper editors. It the press was truly honest about their feelings towards the Royal Family, the UK would be a Republic by now.

  16. Pam says:

    I think part of the problem is that “never complain, never explain” worked fine in the days of “reverse snobbism” (where you totally believe people like the royals are your betters), but I think people have more education these days and a better sense of self, so aren’t going to buy what they’re selling. We all KNOW about Andrew and we all know it’s completely messed up to have the rest of the royal family performing idiot pantomimes of basic labor while they have this stench in their midst.

  17. QuiteContrary says:

    Novelist Hilary Mantel got slammed for calling Kate a mannequin, and here’s Liz Jones, affirming the truth of Mantel’s portrayal of Kate as an empty vessel.

  18. Geegee says:

    Kates left eyebrow is crazy

  19. Iolanthe says:

    If Hilary Mantel were around now , she would amend her mannequin statement . Kate is now a scarecrow.

  20. BeanieBean says:

    ‘…our future monarchs’? William is the future monarch, not Kate. Liz Jones should know better. And the release of yet another official portrait of the P&P of Wales is not actually a normal part of a state banquet. Another thing she should know.

  21. Anne Maria says:

    The writer seems to have fundamentally misunderstood the Wales’ role. It is about ceremony. It isn’t to do anything useful. It is about the shamrock, not making a practical contribution. Maybe the Wales’ need to do more of not being useful. I would prefer an elected head of state but even then the role would be largely ceremonial. The U.K. isn’t the US or France. The power in the U.K. lies with the Prime Minister, and would continue to do so. But a system like Ireland’s, where some outstanding individuals have been elected to the largely ceremonial post of president, is preferable.

  22. Fig says:

    Attacking Harry and Meghan is such low hanging fruit, and they can’t help themselves because that is their only defense and move. This is a crisis in the House of Windsor and they are navigating it horribly!

    • HuffnPuff says:

      The Epstein stench rubs off an all who knew him or looked the other way. Those in the spotlight will do anything to try to get the stench to go away but it never works. Like who thinks this war is partially about trying to distract the public? We were starting to get stories about Trump’s part in it and just like that, he starts a war. The RF is throwing any fodder they can about the princesses or the Sussexes. It shows their desperation and makes you wonder if they are protecting certain RF members.

  23. KC says:

    I must have missed these pictures last week but what in God’s name is that grey coat dress monstrosity she is wearing. That is hands down the fugliest thing I have seen her wear in a very long time. I’m actually repulsed by it. Ewww.

  24. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    My prediction: the royals will pressure any media outlets that have public comments, to censor those comments and remove negative ones. They’ll withhold photos and information until the outlets comply.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment