'10
The last time I checked in on Sarah Jessica Parker’s twin girls, one of them had an awesome (natural?) Mohawk. Well, it looks like little Tabitha and Marion finally have enough hair to properly style, so SJP took her girls out and about in NYC. Actually, the note on the photos says that they twins were going to a doctor’s appointment. How the paparazzi know these things, I’ll never know.
Anyway, I realize it’s a non-story, I just thought the twins were adorable. They look like Matthew, don’t they? Especially the one that SJP is holding. I still don’t know which is which, but I’m going to make a judgment call (out of thin air) and say that SJP is holding Marion, the grumpy brown-eyed one, and the nanny is holding Tabitha, the grumpy blue-eyed one. Those are the faces of two babies who are afraid of needles and are preparing for a hissy fit! I could be wrong, about all of that.
Oh, and I HATE SJP’s outfit. What happened to the fabulous Burberry? These jeans need to be sent back to middle school.
Photos courtesy of Fame.
Written by Kaiser
Posted in Babies, Sarah Jessica Parker
- Heidi Klum is a rock singer now [Crazy Days and Nights]
- Heidi Klum never gets it right [Go Fug Yourself]
- Lots of gorgeous photos of Tom Hardy [Lainey Gossip]
- Kate Moss is wasted [D-Listed]
- Marvel creates superhero for boy with a hearing aid! [Jezebel]
- Daniel Radcliffe wants a superhero movie [Evil Beet]
- Cool photo of couple marrying - with tornado in background [Fark]
- The best onscreen wedding parties [Buzzsugar]
- Men in Black III review [Pajiba]
- Obama bogarts the weed [Gawker]
50 Responses to “Sarah Jessica Parker’s adorable baby girls no longer have Mohawks”
Leave a Reply
By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
freaking adorable!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I’ll bet a million bucks these are not her biological children.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
A story about adorable babies is always preferable to another story about Lindsay’s crack antics!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I think the one SJP is holding looks like Matthew and the other one looks more like her. Cute.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
cute!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Love their little outfits. What a pair of cutie patooties!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
*Fingers & toes crossed* they don’t end up looking like SJP as they get older. Here’s hoping.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
LeeLee, agreed
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I like that they are dressed like little girls, not small adults. The solid leather shoes in the top photo are so much better for baby feet than the ballet slippers worn by you-know-who.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
OMG the one with blue eyes might just be the most adorable thing ever!!!!
and i thought i hatred all things SJP
Report this comment as spam or abuse
they are adorable.
now stay the f%ck home and raise your babies, dummy! you can afford not to make more horrible movies.
thanks!
p.s.- lose the hot nanny! stat!
with matthew’s record anything’s liable to happen.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Ahh, I miss the baby mohawk stage! Yes fun to fix their hair.. unless you have a daughter like mine who would fight, kick and scream and run, rather than have a bow in her hair.. and then tell my Mom “Gammy Mommy won’t put bows in my hair”.. uugh.
The girls are beautiful!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Cutest. babies. ever. (up there with Nahla Aubrey and the Stefani/Rossdale and Watts/Schreiber kiddies).
Report this comment as spam or abuse
They’re just adorable!! Really really cute!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
those are cute babies…and i hardly ever think babies are cute.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Very Cute little girls!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
“Those are the faces of two babies who are afraid of needles and are preparing for a hissy fit!”
Or they don’t like the paps sticking cameras in their faces.
They are BABIES. Why can’t they just leave the tiny ones alone??
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Cute freakin’ kids. Almost as cute as mine
Report this comment as spam or abuse
awwwwww!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
SJP is holding Tabitha with the dark eyes and the nanny has Loretta with the blue eyes.
They’re probably grumpy cuz there are huge flash bulbs in their face.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I think the one she is holding looks just like Matthew also. Too adorable – both of them.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
You stupid knobs are clueless. Sarah had these children conceived by a SURROGATE mother. These are not her biological children. This is why they do not look like her. But never mind cluing in, keep your heads up your arseholes so you can continue to argue about if they look like her or Mathew. Stupid, stupid knobs.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@ Kat
I’m sorry that you’re not aware that “surrogate” does not mean that your own eggs and partner’s sperm can’t be used; a surrogate just means that someone else is carrying your baby to term. Look it up.
Also, that baby in the first picture looks exactly like Matthew.
So, my task for you, is to look up “surrogate” and get some new glasses. Cheers!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Um, kat, sounds like you need a hug, a dictionary and something important to focus your energy on.
Very cute babies but I hate the paps getting in their faces.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Loretta? I thought it was Tabitha & Marion?
In gestational surrogacy, the wife is fertile but incapable of carrying a growing fetus; the child is conceived by in vitro fertilization using the wife’s eggs and her husband’s sperm, and the resulting embryo is implanted in the surrogate mother’s uterus.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/surrogate_mother.aspx
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@P.J. the ballet slippers worn by you-know-who
amy winehouse?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
her name is marion loretta, guess they name her loretta
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@bizzy – thanks for the laugh!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Oh they are cute. I hope SJP and Matthew are happy together because they really have a beautiful family. Oh and I agree with whomever made the comment about the nanny. You don’t want a hot nanny hanging around the house. Just ask Sadie Frost.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Kat: You were saying? lol
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Oh, they are sooo cute! Thanks for sharing the photos!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
ditto RHONYC!
(i think rush ruined ditto) : (
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Kat – ever thought about anger management?!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Adorable babies!
And “Kat” MIGHT need a hug. Angry much?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
“p.s.- lose the hot nanny! stat!
with matthew’s record anything’s liable to happen.”
Like what???
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Kat, you’re wrong. A surrogate is like an egg incubator. Plant the already fertilized egg inside and she keeps it warm, feeds it, and births it. Now, were they Sarah’s eggs or donor eggs, this we don’t know…
I think the one baby really does look like Matthew.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Wow, one looks just like SJP, the other looks just like Broderick. Both are adorable!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Simply adorable!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
The one with blue eyes looks just like their son… so i’m pretty sure they are biologically hers
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Yep, I think LeeLee is spot on!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Kat, you’re right, if only regarding the terms. They aren’t her biological kids. In the world of IVF, bio kids are kids the mom gives birth to, regardless of whether or not they are her genetic offspring. It’s a subtlety that most people don’t use, of course. Now in this case, they could be her genetic kids who were gestated by a surrogate or they could be from donor eggs, but that’s really no one’s business but the family.
Also, Kat. Here’s a hug. You sound like you need one today.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
oh my goodness these babies are beautiful- especially the dark eyed one. i love that they both seem to lean toward looking like one parent- the brown eyed girl looks like matthew, and the blue eyed child like SJP. i love that they don’t look like each other, but have very different, exotic looks. hooray for twins!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Cute babies!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
The paps knew she would be there because SJP or one of her “people” called them. Cute babies though.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I wonder why they gave one of them a male name? Marion is the masculine; Marian is the feminine. Seems odd to me.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Marion is commonly used as a female name in the UK. Not sure where you come from, but you needn’t assume it’s a masculine name. Isn’t there a French actress called MArion Cotilard or something ?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
They are such beautiful kids! How sweet.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@ Ruffian9
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
word on the street here in nyc is that matthew was gettin’ into a lil’ somethin, somethin publicly with a waitress (or 2) before the twins were born.
gossip, i know but still.
hot nannies are a no-no, duh!
does ‘the hand that rocks the cradle’ mean nothing to sjp?
has she learned nothing from the sadie frost/jude law fiasco! lol
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Sorry but all you saying that they aren’t her biological children are soooo sooo wrong. they ARE her children, hello they both look exactly like Matthew and James Wilkie. When they were smaller they resembled SJP.
Actually I think SJP is holding Tabitha, the nanny has Loretta. Tabitha was the one with the Mohawk you are talking about in those old pictures.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
“Marion is commonly used as a female name in the UK.”
But she’s not in or from the UK.
Report this comment as spam or abuse