Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jul 18
'08
Salma Hayek splits with fiancé

Salma Hayek split with her fiancé and father of her baby daughter, French billionaire Francois-Henri Pinault. The two met in Venice in May of 2006 and announced their engagement and Salma’s pregnancy in March of 2007. Hayek has long said she doesn’t need marriage, and even though the two were engaged, she made many conflicting statements that made it sound like she wasn’t certain if she wanted to ever formally marrying Pinault. Hayek issued a statement through her rep, which of course gave next to no details.

Salma Hayek and French billionaire Francois-Henri Pinault — the father of her daughter Valentina — have called off their engagement.

“We are sad to announce the engagement of Salma Hayek and Francois-Henri Pinault has been canceled,” Hayek’s rep said in a statement to USA Today. “There will be no further comment.”

Hayek, 41, told the April issue of Glamour that she didn’t feel the “need” to get married. “Do I think we are going to get married? Probably. Will it make a difference? I hope not,” she said. “You want to grow old with someone, you want to have a partner and to have children — we have all those things,” Hayek added. “Some people need the commitment. Maybe we’ll just make the party!”

[From Us Magazine]

The pair definitely had an unusual dating strategy. They had a long distance relationship, which generally is hard on most couples. Though most couples are only able to afford to drive ten hours once a month or something, whereas billionaire Pinault could probably afford to charter his own time machine and portal to wherever Salma was.

Salma told Oprah that living far apart kept their relationship fresh.

When Salma got engaged to French businessman Francois-Henri Pinault, she says they initially had every intention of getting married after a traditional engagement. “…After I got pregnant, I don’t know why, [but] the [ceremony] part of it is not necessary because we have such a huge commitment for each other. I don’t know that we have to go through the rituals.”

Salma and Francois-Henri have a unique relationship—they are based in different cities and spend most time separated by an ocean. Still, Salma says they see each other often. “Every time he comes, it’s an event. And every time I go, it’s the same and it’s so romantic and it’s so exciting. And the time we spend together, it’s 100 percent quality time. And then the time we’re not together, I have 100 percent quality time to my baby, to myself, to my career,” she says. “So for us, it works. Now, it’s not an open marriage. Nobody think this is too modern and don’t get the wrong idea—the level of commitment is exactly the same.”

[From Oprah]

Unfortunately it sounds like it didn’t work for them in the end. While it’s sad, from what she’s said in the past it sounds like Salma will be fine. The relationship obviously meant a lot to her but wasn’t her whole world. Hopefully everybody involved will be able to pick up and move on peacefully.

Here’s Salma Hayek and her daughter Valentina in Malibu on Sunday. Header of Salma and Francois-Henri at the Costume Institute Gala on May 7th, 2007. Images thanks to WENN.

Written by JayBird

Posted in Breakups, Francois-Henri Pinault, Salma Hayek

Pages: 1 2 3 4

22 Responses to “Salma Hayek splits with fiancé”

  1. Is she working on a movie now?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. I’m not sure where it says they broke up…it just says they ended their engagement…which isn’t that surprising given her feelings about marriage. Are you sure they ended their relationship?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. This is sad. I saw it coming and I said so. They did not have chemistry at all. I love her but she seems to have gone into this with her head. Iam 40, I am not getting any younger, I need a child. He is a good man. I don’t think she needed his money. Good luck Salma. Love will come along.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. If I look even a millionth as good at 41, I’ll be celebrating.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. Kaiser/ Hippacrat:

    Salma is another one of those Icons of Sanctimony - to me, at least. I bet he was the one to break it off, and I bet he did it a while ago.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. Her retirement fund was fully vested once she had the kid.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. “They did not have chemistry at all” ?? wtf? How do you know. Looks like they had plenty of chemistry to me. Why second-guess a couple you don’t even know? That’s not even speculation.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. Because I say So:

    Don’t usually comment on children, but little Valentina is absolutely precious! By far the cutest kid I’ve seen in quite a while

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. I LOVE those chubby Valentina legs!!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. Adorable kid. Wonder if Selma had a kid with him (rather than someone else) just because he’s rich. I’m not convinced she was in love with him.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. The only thing attractive about that man is his money. The baby is cute though. So chubby and delicious :D

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. Typical screwed up Hollywood relationship.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. How does everybody “know” that she was with him solely for money and a child? She strikes me as a very intelligent person who had a bad relationship! Just because he’s not some tall, dark, and handsome model doesn’t mean she didn’t love him. I can’t imagine that she would produce a child with this man just for the money.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. So much for their “huge commitment”. They live in different countries and only saw each other sporadically. Kid or no kid…did anyone really believe this was gonna last?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  15. She doesn’t need a retirement or his money or even money from acting. She’s an heiress and wealthy before she was ever an actress. Her family is extremely wealthy….idiots.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  16. Beauty and the beast.When does any relationship last-anywhere?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  17. Well think about it like this Meredith. She could have gone to a sperm bank if she just wanted a kid. Now she gets gucci child support.
    I read somewhere that he was financing her production company. Well that put’s a different spin on things. In recent years that’s been her nest egg.Actresses come and go but billionaires? He’s not hot but he knows he can get anybody he wants.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  18. Right on Country Babe! I heard if they got married and divorced he was gonna fight her in court for custody of her breast-age. She was gonna have Homer sign a prenup that would have only given him visitation. He responded with a “DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM BITCH!!!!” thing,,,anyways YADA YADA..you get it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  19. Wasn’t rich enough for her shopping needs.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  20. Surprise!!!

    Like we couldn’t see that one coming.

    Face it Selma, you weren’t fooling anyone when you chose a dried up billionaire to be the sperm donor for your baby.

    Now your really set for life-good job!!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  21. I read somewhere that she was hapy with him, but that there were no sparks. I think it was Lainey from Laineygossip, who saw them at some event. She also said that between Salma and Ed Norton back in the day - there WERE sparks. Who knows?

    I remember thinking when I read the above press release, that it was so cold…no “we are remaining friends” …no nothing….seemed odd…like there is more to this than meets the eye!

    At any rate, Valentina is adorable!!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply


Comment Policy: Please be courteous as if you are having a conversation in person. No all-caps posts. If you make comments using different nicknames, repeatedly harass others, or spam, you will be banned. If you make an exceptionally rude comment that people complain about, it will be deleted. Do not dominate the threads by making the same point over and over again or you will be banned. We understand and respect that threads can get heated. Threads will occasionally be closed if the conversation gets very nasty. Repeatedly baiting other commenters or giving rude and attacking responses is not allowed. It's a shame we have to mention that because most of you are kind and respectful of other's opinions.

Comments occasionally become moderated due to spammer's keywords and abuse complaints against specific users, but are otherwise not moderated. We are not responsible for comments in any way and while we work hard to moderate hate words and clean them up we do not have the time or inclination to ensure that they're all acceptable to everyone. In other words - do not blame us for stupid or offensive comments. You will find them on almost every open comment site online. Use the "report spam or abuse" link to get us to delete something if it's offensive.

:D :-) :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

Recent Comments:
  • Jake Long: Hi. I’m a white dude and I love my latina women. I love how passionate they get when I’m...
  • AP: I think Crispin Porter and Bogusky (the agency behind this ad) finally crashed. Maybe they were high when they...
  • Christina: i have to say, either way… this girl is gorgeous…
  • Anne: I thought it was funny.
  • AP: Leave her alone.
  • AP: I draw for a living. I draw cute illustrations. It’s how I make money, how I pay my bills, how I put food...
  • Diva: “Raisin McCain” lmao Oh, Colbert is hilarious. :lol:
  • Christina X: Gotta respect an arrogant twit with another identity crisis. But you know, keep arguing yourself blue in...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.