'08
Update 2: It’s not a big conspiracy and just looks like some mismanagement on People’s part. The story is now up on People’s homepage nearly a half an hour after their announced release time, after it was posted then removed. The babies are so little and fragile-looking, although you can see one of them smile sleepily as Brad and Angelina look on adoringly. An inset photo features little two year old Shiloh holding one of them.
Update: Apparently People.com posted the cover of the magazine in their “News” section briefly, but never added the story to the front page. Within five minutes, it was removed. Thanks to Lena for the link to ONTD’s mirror of the cover and article. Angelina calls their house “chaos,” and Brad says it’s a “a cuckoo’s nest,” but it also sounds like they’re having a lot fun. Angelina talks about how her two older daughters help out and calls them “little mommies.” And apparently there are just 19 pages of photos, not 30 as previously reported:
They are just 3 weeks old, but twins Knox Léon and Vivienne Marcheline are about to take the world by storm.
In an exclusive interview and photos, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie offer PEOPLE an intimate look at their growing family.
“It is chaos, but we are managing it and having a wonderful time,” Jolie tells PEOPLE of daily life at the Château Miraval in Provence, France, where the couple’s four older children – Maddox, 6, Pax, 4, Zahara, 3, and Shiloh, 2 – have been enjoying a summer of outdoor play (hide-and-seek is a favorite) on the château’s sprawling grounds.
Adds Pitt: “[It’s] still a cuckoo’s nest.”
Fortunately, they already have some household helpers. “[Shiloh] and Z pick out [the twins’] clothes and help change and hold them,” says Jolie. “It’s sweet – they are little mommies.”
For the complete story, including 19 pages of intimate family photos and the full interview with Brad and Angelina, pick up this week’s issue of PEOPLE, on newsstands Monday
[From People.com and removed, via ONTD]
The first photos of three week old fraternal boy and girl twins Knox Léon and Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt were supposed to premiere on People.com tonight at 7pm EDT. The magazine’s website has had red banner at the top of their homepage since Friday announcing the much-anticipated debut of the twins. At about 7:05 they removed the banner, though, with no explanation of when we could expect to see the first photo online.
They have a reported 30 freaking page spread coming out in People tomorrow that cost the magazine $14 million, which was split with UK publication Hello. It’s possible someone at People made the stupid executive decision at the last minute not to put the photos online or to wait until tomorrow. They won’t lose much in advance publicity considering how well the issue will sell. It still seems like a very short-sighted decision that may cost them repeat traffic to their website. I know it’s going to disappoint a lot of their Internet readers. We’ll have to see how they handle this tomorrow, and I’ll ask JayBird to see if anything goes up tonight before she goes to bed. I’m in Europe where it’s past 1:00 am now and this ten minute delay with no apology on their site has pissed me off royally.
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Angelina Jolie, Babies, Brad Pitt
195 Responses to “First photos of Knox and Vivienne Jolie-Pitt are here”
-
there is a pic up on hellomagazine.com as of 1h UK time.
-
I say BOYCOTT THESE MEDIA WHORES!!!!!!
-
Thank you! They had it up for a moment in the news section, and then removed it. I will update the post.
-
Great pictures, People’s cover shots are better than Hello.
Too Cute!! Shiloh is a peanut.
They all look so happy. Good for them!
*Taking a drink of my Mimosa*
Thanks CB.
-
On the cover, Shiloh holding one of the twins is too cute. =]
-
those pics aren’t as cute as shiloh’s.
-
I agree- we should boycott these media whores.
More than half of Angelina’s income coms from her children.
It’s a shame Brangelina exploit their children that way and have had 6 children in 2 years.
They treat their children as products and publicity props.
-
Looks like these babies got Mom’s lips too. They’re so adorable, and Shiloh holding the baby is just precious. I love looking at babies. Taking care of them? Someone else do it, please.
The front of People says it’s a 19 page photo spread, not 30. I’m not buying it anyway. Although I may riffle through it while buying groceries next weekend.
I’m not even getting into the arguments with the haters tonight, as a BADette, I’m off duty on weekends. But y’all keep on, and I’ll get to you tomorrow.
-
THE LIPS!!!
Oh, the beh-behs are cute too. Love love love. Shiloh is getting so big!
-
Goddamn moderation. I was just telling Ethan and hello to suck it.
-
I second that
-
@Daisy - my original comment is obscenity-laced and not for the faint of heart. Perhaps moderated out of a sense of decency?
-
You sound like my kind of drinking buddy Kaiser.
Ciao for now. -
I updated the post with a much better picture from Hello! Hit reload to see it. Kaiser that comment you wrote was a bit too harsh and will not see the light of day.
-
I don’t get it. They look like any old baby. They could have just taken some new borns and said they were the twins.
-
What’s a “BADette”?
Secret Celebitchy cult? Is there some sort of secret “Skull and Bones” like ceremony?
-
LOL, CB…just as well. Just don’t understand the need of some to obsessively hater-troll.
-
I am so tired of these people. They both are just so-so actors anyways.
-
Good deal, hello and Ethan. Boycott them. VERY good idea. So we won’t expect to see your user names in the comments of Angelina threads again, right? Or any variation that is actually you under a different name, right?
Good. Stick to that. It’s about time some of you started taking my advice. I do that with certain celebrities I’m not even going to bother to name, because I ignore them THAT much.
That being said, the dark headed one is the girl. I figured out that much, LOL. Shiloh gets more adorable by the dadgummed DAY, and these pics are great. I don’t buy magazines at all (I’m trying to save money) so I won’t be buying these issues, but it’s cool to see the pics.
-
candyass: there are celebrities I’m really tired of, too. I refuse to even read anything about them, much less comment in articles about them.
I’ve felt much better since adopting that practice. I sincerely suggest trying it.
-
God love you CB; it’s an unholy hour for you to be looking at baby-pics
Kristen - if it weren’t for the lips on the darker-haired baby, I would completely agree with you (so as it stands I just agree with you
) Anyway, they have the required amount of heads, limbs, fingers and toes, so that’s all that really matters. huh - there is indeed an initiation ceremony. It requires making up the most random of cocktails and getting absolutely blotto (real-drunk or cyber-drunk is acceptable
)
-
Any one notice Angelina and Brad Pitt’s body language in the pictures. Kinda disconnected. Happens when you have too many kids all at once. You start disliking each other.
Well, the little twins are no big deal, like I knew they wouldn’t be. I have seen better looking three week old babies. This child pimping gets old after a while. Brad and Angelina seem stresses despite the photo shop. I guess they would be with all the kids to run after, even when you have nannies. They should have waited longer before showing them. They look like rats, and not cute rats. They will grow into their looks.
-
aww
they´re so cute!!! -
Not a big fan of Ms Jolie’s night robe.
So now we’ve seen the babies, what’s next?
-
Ah, the look on Brad and Angie’s face — you know what they’re thinking… those little bastards just made us $14 million !!!!
-
Wow. I haven’t seen anything this fake since “A Joan Crawford Christmas.”
-
aww…they are cute! those lips are dynamite!
-
Didn’t they just complain about the media intruding on their lives and yet they SELL photos of their KIDS. What kind of people do that?
I am disgusted by this entire family…..i wish the paparazzi hound these two and their families for ever ever
-
Would have been nice if People Magazine would have put a picture of ALL of their children on the cover not just the biological ones. Pretty sure it was just an oversight on their part?
The babies are cute with their big ol’ lips !! -
Papa Pitt is looking mighty tired these days. I cannot imagine that many kids in one house.
The pose reminds me of the one for Shiloh… on the bed, looking adoringly at the peanut. Meh. I’d rather see Maddox strangling Pax in a headlock while Ang tries to run around breastfeeding both babies and Z is yanking Shiloh’s hair.
-
I like the quotes, trying to make it seem like everything is rosy. NOT. If you have one kids and you think you are losing it sometimes, try six with twins. No wonder the photo shop could not hide their aged looks.I am also wondering why they put emphasis on the bio kids. I imagine Brad and Angelina agreed to these covers. Telling…..
Vivi’s mouth is going to be open all the time like Shilohs.
On the whole, now that this is done, what next for these two to seek attention? I wonder. Atleast they made more than Angelina made from movies in a year.
-
So tiny! Shi is just a sweetie!
-
Forgot to drop a line before I check out:
Plan B Production Co. — we produce babies not films!
I bet Ms Aniston will come out to claim that was her original idea before she and Mr Pitt filed for divorce.
-
It must be a CONSPIRACY, y’all! ZOMG! Angelina has put poor poor Brad into a horrible trance with her amazing vagina powers!
No. No, that’s not it. Actually they are BOTH in cahoots to POPULATE THE WORLD with their children, both bio and adopted! Muwahahahahaaaaa!! Yes, that’s it!
Or no, even better: they are going to have 32 biological children so that they can just stop making movies. No wait, she still makes movies. Erm, so that theory doesn’t float. Otherwise she’d have retired by now. Shoot.
Ok ok I’ve got it: really this is a conspiracy to MAKE YOU INSANE WITH JEALOUSY OF THEM! Yes! And it’s workign on some of you! Watch out, A&B are sending their amazing death rays into your brains where your dura matter will slowly dissolve as you turn into a puddle of hatred and jealousy! You just wish that you could have three babies in two years and still look like that! You wish you had all their money! They adopt children, too! And give millions to charity! And are movie stars! It drives you CRAZY insane, admit it.
The two best looking people in the world get together and reproduce and it causes paroxyms of insane hatred amongst those prone to it!
God, I had no idea A&B were so incredibly powerful. I’m really kind of impressed with their plans to take over the world!
But on a more serious note: those of you making ugly comments about the babies are really gross. They’re babies. No matter what you think of the parents you don’t get to decide who you get born to. Try to grow up.
-
They’re a beautiful family. Beautiful all around. Shiloh’s so cute.
-
What a surprise… they look like three week old babies
-
If one were to boycott the Jolie-Pitt family, wouldn’t one avoid the posts about them? Oh, that’d be way to logical…
Sweet little peanuts! All the kiddos!
-
Adorable beautiful babies and Shiloh takes the cake.
I hope they hire enough help.
Word to Jennifer Maniston: freeze your eggs since you are in a perpetual player stage nowadays chasing pretty boys at age 39……
-
YAY!! The pictures are here! Well, almost. I can’t wait to see the full spread & read the article. So, who was it here who predicted that the twins would have Angelina’s famous lips? It was one of the BADettes, and she was RIGHT! Especially the one twin, the one on Jolie’s side of the photo. They’re tiny little munchkins, aren’t they? They were only 5 pounds apiece when they were born three weeks ago, so no wonder. I can’t wait to see them at Shiloh’s age…
Anastasia, that post just above was funny, you nailed it regarding OMG HaterTroll Phenomenon.
Well, it’s a mellow Sunday evening, and tomorrow there’s sure to be a new Jolie-Pitt Family thread, so I’ll pass out celebratory flutes of Veuve Cliquot to all here who’d like to celebrate the Arrival and Photographic Proof of the Twin Messiahs!
*raises champagne, drinks down contents in one fell swoop. Bubbles spuitter out of nose. Giggles set in immediately thereafter.*
Congratulations, Angelina and Brad!
-
The cover is so………WHITE!
-
I don’t understand your weird proto-logic. Damned dirty apes.
1.) They aren’t keeping the money - it is for charity.
2.) If they agree to pics, they can abate the media frenzy a bit and also control the setting, personnel, final prints, etc.
All I see is a media-savvy couple who understands the pics will be shot anyway, so why not have control over it and make some money for charity? Y
ou may not agree with the idea of allowing the media to snap pics of your kids even for that, which is understandable, but regardless it certainly is a far cry from selling their baby souls to the media for 14 mill for mom and dad’s next..10000 tattoos.
-
Sooooo, the ADOPTED ones didn’t make the cover!!!!! Kiss my a..
-
Shiloh is adorable!
Yup… looks like one is dark headed and the other light.
Can’t wait to see what they look like later. I wonder if they will favor Angelina more? We all know Shiloh favors Brad except for those lips!
-
Awww, these photos just make me want to…BUY BRAD A RAZOR!!!
Yeesh! It’s amazing–he can look really fantastic (clean cut and in a tux), but this shaggy-haired goatee nastiness he has going on…
Maybe they should keep the money for the pictures and just go ahead and hire Brad a stylist. Or, as I said, buy the poor guy a razor.
(my shallowness for the day!)
As for the photos, I absolutely think getting them out to a managaize ASAP is the best thing this couple can do–especially when they are being stalked by paparazzi cammied up in the woods!
I know some people think of them as desperate for media attention, but how do you recognize the difference between their wanting attention and their getting it whether they want it or not?
If they DON’T want it and still get it, how do they get rid of it (especially when there seems to be such an insatiable market for news about them?)
I mean, seriously, what can they do beyond not making movies, never letting the children out of the house and moving to, I don’t know, the moon?? -
I thought the same thing when I saw the People cover. Where are their adopted children of color? Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but that definitely jumped out at me. Also, I have a two-year-old and there is no way in hell I would let him hold a newborn! Even if he was sitting down!
-
Those Voight lips again!
-
Well these photos were specifically to show the world the new babies. Hasn’t everyone seen their other children like seven brazillion times? Is there some specific reason everyone needs to see them again? Have you forgotten what Pax and Maddox and Zahara and Shiloh look like or something? Also, unless you’ve seen the 19 page spread, you can’t say for sure their other kids AREN’T in this.
The same people who call them media whores then turn around and bitch if they don’t put out pics of EVERY SINGLE kid every SINGLE time? That makes no sense whatsoever.
When Shiloh was born, the pics were of (gasp!) Shiloh.
You know when you have new members of the family and the family is already quite big, it’s kind of nice when they can have just a moment that is just their own. Especially since it will probably be the last, LOL!
Unless every single picture taken of you since you became a parent ALSO includes every single one of your kids, you have no room to talk.
-
Amy, really? I’ve seen lots of two year olds hold newborns. They’re usually propped up on a bed, as Shiloh seems to be, and there are about sixteen adult hands standing at the ready just in case, and the kid holds the baby for about 10 seconds, tops.
They do ok. Really! It’s usually just for a cute pic. A lot of second time parents do this with their older toddler.
-
The 14 Mill is for pics of the twins……I’m sure the “adopted” children as you call them are doing just fine and not worrying too much because they’re not on the “cover”…lol.
-
I don’t care all that much about the kids either way - but the idea they can’t get away from the paps if they REALLY wanted to is laughable.
A couple guys I served with in Iraq now operate a civilian protection service that caters to celebs and businessmen. You would be ASTOUNDED at the lengths some of these people go to avoid being messed with by fans and the press - and get this, it actually WORKS!
You start by purchasing a ’small’ mansion (you know, where you don’t have to patrol 60 freaking acres with a handful of people). You electrify the fence, put guard shacks ever 100 yards or so, install motion sensors that can pick up people trying to jump the wall - problem solved.
Mel Gibson was one of the first major celebs to go this route, and it has turned out to be a pretty foolproof system.
I am just tired of hearing ANY celeb bitch about their ‘privacy’. If you want it badly enough, and you have the kind of money they do, you can make it happen. Paps are stupid, but they’re not suicidal.
It’s a BS argument anyways - because they still could have released a few digital camera shots within hours or days of them being born, made no money off of it, and still avoided the pap mobs.
This has never been about their privacy, it’s just another shrewd PR decision. I also agree with a few other posters - why do they only show the biological kids now? I suppose third world orphans just aren’t photogenic enough now that you’ve got all these ‘perfect’ genetic specimens around, huh?
-
Snowblood, you are freaking weird.
-
Wow! I can’t believe how tired they look. It makes me feel much better about how I looked when my kids were born. If THESE two can look that haggard, then. . .
Anyone remember that Simpsons episode where Apu has octuplets? At one point there is a door with a sign that reads “Danger: Newborns”! My feelings exactly!
-
I think the complaints about only the biological kids being on the cover isn’t about the twins being front and center (as others have pointed out this is their outting). It’s about People putting a picture of Shiloh with one of the twins in the corner of the COVER - and ONLY Shiloh with a twin. If the picture of Shiloh wasn’t there I don’t think there would be complaints about “biological kids” because people would obviously expect the twins to be front and center but Shiloh being there too is putting extra attention to her (the other biological child) on her siblings’ day while leaving the other kids (the adopted kids) off - and it seems deliberately done by People. Or at least to me. I would certainly hope ALL children are inside the issue, but the issue about the biological kids is about the cover - not the inside. IMO, it should have just been Brad, Angelina, and the twins only on the cover. If they wanted a second pic in the corner of the cover all the kids (including the adopted ones) should have been in it, imo. I think a picture of all the kids would have been very, very sweet on the front, and would have highlighted the whole group - which you would think Brad and Angelina would want.
But back to the twins they are cute and I’m sure the pictures inside are cute too. I don’t buy People anymore but I’ll probably flip through it to look or look at them online.
-
i’m glad shiloh is on the cover- i love when the closest in age sibling holds the newborn- it’s not as cute when the 6yr.old holds the baby.
and IF any of the other kids had been featured on the cover, all the haters would be out with their “oh typipal angelina ignoring the blob.”
they just can’t win with that topic.
hope they are enjoying the little angels
-
Oh My Gosh!!! These pictures are adorable. Brad and Angie are so beautiful, and look contented and happy. And as for Miss Shiloh, that picture with her and her baby sister is to die for. That is hella precious.
I will be buying the People magazine as soon as it comes to my bookstore. Can’t wait.
-
Trolls are on ignore for me tonight. These pictures are too beautiful to spoil responding to idiots. Let them froth and foam at the mouths to their hearts content. Not going to bother me.
Peace. -
I have to agree with some of the posters– it seems like in this whole twin madness I keep hearing about Shiloh and her new baby brother and sister, and they forget the others– they’re part of the family too! Not that the picture of Shiloh isn’t adorable though.
-
These pictures make my ovaries sigh.
Damn you Jolie-Pitts and your (presumably) beautiful spawn! -
WHO CARES??????????? Do we have anything better to clamor about than the birth of 2 bastard children. Two years from now Brangelina will be long over with. Just like every other Hollywood union.
-
Awwww look at that the kids are adorable one of them is even smiling. ..maybe knox or viv is thinking awwww losers are all gonna be marinating with hate when they see us aren’t we all cute.
-
for those complaining who cares? I think all of you do because if you don’t care you wouldn’t be here reading this post and commenting
-
It is the magazine editors and staff who decide which pictures will be in the magazine or on the cover.
I’m not sure if the complaints are towards Brad and Angie or the media themselves regarding the “adopted” children.
(and last year wasn’t there a big boo-hoo about Angelina not loving Shiloh as much as her ‘adopted’ kids? Talk about never pleasing anyone ANY of the time!!) -
Wow some people are really rude. I just said I was tired about hearing about them and I dont understand why people are so obsessed with them?
-
Wow….you got me there, Reality. Does your Mommy know you’re up this late?
-
czarina, never mind the trolls. They are grasping at straws.
-
They really are!
-
I just think little itty bitty babies tug at my fallopian tubes . . . I really couldn’t care less who queefed them out.
-
I was 2 when my sister was born and there are plenty of pics of me holding her…sure I am sitting down, like Shiloh, and my sister is resting on a pillow, I don’t think that’s a big deal.
-
#3 and #8 - Just how, exactly, are Brad and Angelina media whores? If anything, they shun the spotlight, unlike some other “celebrities” such as Mariah Carey, Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, etc. Brad and Angelina sold their twins baby pics to the highest bidder and are donating all that money to charity. I wonder how many other “celebrities” can claim that?! Mariah was going to have a second wedding ceremony (beyond ridiculous and WHO CARES?), but she passed on the idea when she realized no press would be bidding for the photos and thus, paying for her second wedding in the process. Mariah Carey is a media whore! Leave Brad and Angelina alone! They are wonderful people and a beautiful (physically as well as spiritually) family. Boycott if you want, it wont make much of a difference as most people love and admire the Jolie-Pitts! They care about more than just themselves. They are true philanthropists and will be remembered for their work on and off the screen.
-
#62 - You should never call ANY child a bastard! How dare you? It doesn’t matter how they got here and who their parents may be … all children are precious and should be treasured. Shame on you!
-
wow… they’re so cute
i can’t wait to have my baby in february,
all the best for brad & angie
-
devilsadvocate
Wow….you got me there, Reality. Does your Mommy know you’re up this late?
=========
Does the administrator of the mental institution knows you’re using the office computer? -
Very sweet. Those lips! Much prefer the Hello! cover to the people one tho’, much more natural and real looking. They even look a bit knackered.
Since the article talks about ‘new mommies’ Zahara and Shiloh, shame they didn’t use an insert pic featuring both with the twins? How cute would that have been. Think People made a poor decision there. It IS a very white cover, almost the first thing that went through my mind when I saw it. Not stirring, just saying.
-
Well, Im sure Jon Voight bought a copy of People, since thats the only way he will ever see what his grandbabies look like…if Angie was so “mother teresa like” as all her fans seem to think..she could find it in heart to forgive her father, and let him meet his grandchildren…
-
‘We are like a cucoon…’ Brad
____________________________
No you’re not! you are self centred, ego centric, pyschotic, obsessive baby collecting, child pimping, media whores who will do anything for attention and PR for the brangelina brand which has become your major source of income. These twins are the latest product of the brand, an adoptee will soon follow, for Zahara this time because she is the only black in the family.And whoever thinks that the cover of a magazine would go out without the sanctioning of these two greedy media savvy losers is just plain naive, of course they knew what the cover would look like, but they never even thought it would be an issue that only bio kids made it on the covers, they are probably too tired from the lack of sleep and all they want is the cheque.
-
Kelly why is it your business if they wanted to adopt or have biological kids? Does it in anyway affect the way you live your life? Leave them alone, they are doing just fine with or without your vitriol.
-
@ Kelly
Huh? Did I miss something? When did Brad say “we are like a cucoon”? I saw something about a cuckoo’s nest, but nothing about a “cucoon”, whatever the hell that is. OH! you meant cocoon!!! Yeah, except he didn’t say that either. But nice try, Kelly. Here’s a napkin to wipe the foam off your mouth.
-
“‘We are like a cucoon…’ Brad”
Learn to quote properly, why dontcha? If you don’t know what he meant by ‘cuckoo’s nest’ (= madhouse), fair enough. Don’t be embarrassed. I think the word you were trying to put into his mouth was cocoon. And a ‘cucoon’ (I googled just to further your ed.) is apparently a condom dispenser. The things you learn.
-
Gosh, I could’t be bothered to check for the actual word. Didn’t care that much. Just coming here drains my energies.
People.com is wondering why their site has not yet crushed with demand .lol. they are surprised at the luke warm response to covers that were supposed to ‘take the world by a storm’. Well, I told you, pay that money at your own peril. it will not all go to charity and the magazine sales will not be worth it. Ironically if they had put the other non white kids there too, maybe it would have garnered more sales.
I hope no one buys these magazines and every one flips through them on the stands.
just thinking about it, Gwen Stephanie was due at the end of last month. we haven’t seen her in weeks, has she had her baby yet?
-
Kelly it’s not your money so stop worrying. Believe me people will buy why is that you want to believe the worst for these two people? Did they kill a member of your family?
-
Shiloh made the cover with the twins because Shiloh is the other child the general public MOST WANTS to see and therefore will sell the most magazines.
Shiloh is the other child of theirs I most wanted to see.
If Shiloh on the cover without the adoptees bothers you, there are other issues in your life bothering you. Who cares which children of theirs are most popular with the general public? Who cares if the general public primarily wants to see their biological kids? The people who most often buy this magazine are white. This isn’t a terrible thing, just a simple explanation as to why Shiloh makes the cover. She’s their (angelic and adorable) biological child, and generates greater interest with the magazine buying public.
I STILL can’t stand the thought of Shiloh (or these babies for that matter) at age 18 entering a tattoo shop and getting their first of many trashy tattoos.
No no no!! Don’t do it Shiloh!!
You are beautiful just how you are. If you like a particular symbol or picture, frame it and hang it on a wall!!
-
geronimo………So that’s what those grubby things in the toilets are called!
The things you learn…..except spelling
-
Xia, for the sake of accuracy, a ‘cucoon’ is actually a bizarre, designery brand of dispenser, not like normal ones. Just wanted to clarify since there’s enough misinformation on here already.
http://www.susannehangaard.dk/uk/cucoon/
Read the desc. for a belly laugh. Every home should have a cuckoo-dispensing condom gizmo. -
But - I thought the thing about cuckoos was that they left their eggs in the nests of other birds to raise? So in reality the cuckoo’s nest is probably a fairly serene place
Is Bradders confused or more capable of subtle analogies than I gave him credit for?
-
People Magazine probably chose to leave out the adopted children just to incite controversy and attention from folks who otherwise wouldn’t care about celebrity baby spread #437. A family portrait would have been too predictable. I guess People Magazine decided that biological white family + controversy would sell better than unmarried white couple + multi-ethnic children.
-
Cuckoo’s nest - pejorative term for an insane asylum. Cuckoo as in crazy, in this instance. Crazy house.
-
Gwen Stephanie?
Odd that I never even noticed that only the Caucasian children were on the cover. I guess that’s because I don’t really think of the others as non-Caucasians. I don’t look at Pax and think “Oh, Vietnamese kid”, I just think “cute kid”.
-
It’s just too easy isn’t it Syko
-
brangeloonies can get rlly mean when u dont have the same opinion as them.u guys seriouly need to calm down and stop making personal attacks just because some people dont agree with u gius on some stuff. and as for the jealousy part, seriously? if they rlly wanted to sell their baby’s pics they shldve waited longer. at this age, they all look the same. that being said,i still dislike angie, she’s trying to be someone who she’s rlly not. she’ll go back to her old ways. wait and see!!
-
Sorry, you have to be a stone cold soulless waste of life to not see those babies say anything but precious. Get therapy, haters.
-
yes, we dint say they’re not precious. geez, jst because we feel differently abt these ppl, we need therapy?
-
Kelly = Barfy Lola
I would recognize that frothing/barfing mouth, Cruise obsession (on the other thread) and general insanity anywhere.
You know what I like about these pics - and the Shiloh newborn photos? How natural they are. Even though I was loathe to hate on J.Lo & Marc Anthony, those were the baby pics that were over the top.
Other than that… well, it looks like a lot of people skipped Mad Men to hate on The Brange. Bad choices, Trolls.
-
I know Syko, like you I look at Pax and just think he looks like a cute nice boy-
I look at Maddox and think “Cool Kid”
I look at Shiloh and think “Pretty little moppet”
I look at Ms. Z and think “Mein Leader”
-
Sooooo, the ADOPTED ones didn’t make the cover!!!!! Kiss my a..
Because this cover is about the NEWBORNS you idiot, or did you sleep through that part ?
-
I see we have fans from another blog on here. You’ve all admitted it & I’m a fan of that blog also. Please people, do not attempt to imitate Mike K’s writing style in your posts here. It just comes off as lame-o. I’m referring to one of the 1st 25 posts on here. Can I please request we keep the posts true to the stylish style of this blog & not be practically IMing each other? Someone said here that though they love that other blog they do not comment on there & save reading the comments on CB. Amen. This really the only celeb blog worth reading the comments. CB is quality not quantity. Keep up the good work CB!
-
yes, we dint say they’re not precious. geez, jst because we feel differently abt these ppl, we need therapy?
Try English.
-
disgusted so true, they had to have made the deal to sell the pictures a while back. These two are desperate for attention.
And ugh, 2 hours on a photo shoot 14 million. Brad doesn’t make money that fast in movies. Gee that’s the same money Ange makes in a whole year.
DOn’t worry Shane Shiloh,Viv and Knox will probably be with Brad at that point. Not that he’s a good role model.
I’ve noticed that too Cameron. Those poor children I knew this would happen. Well they’ll have alot money to lean on while they write their mommy dearest books.
I’m sure Brad and Ange okayed the cover.
Sleepy I would have expected a family picture on the cover, to tone it down and not make it about these two. We know they go paid for them. -
haha vdantev is a good example of how protective brangeloonies are over their precious angie. its disgusting. u guys are like lifeless people refreshing the page over and over again. haha. i better leave, im becoming as lifeless as u guys refreshing the page.
-
Don’t agree with the ‘deliberate attempt to provoke’ posts but can’t quite understand what’s wrong with thinking (in my case) a shot of Shiloh AND Zahara with a twin each would have made a cuter than cute image on the cover, since Z’s one of the ‘little mommies’ referred to in the article. Nothing to do with colour. Just a cute pic. That’s all. *Mumbles something unprintable about PC crap*
-
I agree Mairead, Ms.Z kicks ass
-
Kaiser:
lena:
NB:
hello:
daisy424:
angiee:
janie:
Ethan:
Simone:
Syko:
Kristin:
huh:
candyass:
Anastasia:
Mairead:
Carla:
Larissa:
James:
ugh:
Mike:
Anni:
disgusted:
KDRockstar:
SixxKitty:
wfb:
Steph:
Bodhi:
Shane:
Snowblood:
cara:
Alex:
Jenna:
czarina:
Amy:
xiaoecho:
Leandra:
Scott F.:
texasmom:
Sleepy:
LiLi:
pamela:
Jill:
Jaundice Machine:
devilsadvocate:
Reality Check:
Tania:
blip:
geronimo:
someone:
kelly:
Cari:
geronimo:
Cameron:
clover:
vdantev:
Nan:
countrybabe:
CB use this…
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/26439974.html and this one
http://img1.hugeup.com/f/08032008/fbc7bf689.png
Report this comment as spam or abuse