Jennifer Aniston appears on ‘Chelsea Lately’ to promote her engagement

Last night, Jennifer Aniston was the first guest (?) on the re-vamped, new-studio’d Chelsea Lately. It was surprising because Aniston literally has nothing to promote but herself and her engagement and because this comes in the midst of a week where Brad Pitt is promoting a documentary he produced and his new Chanel ads. SHOCKING. I’m embedding the full episode – Sandra Bullock appears in the first bit (and Bullock is way funnier than Chelsea). Aniston comes in around the 16 minute mark.

Yeah. Aniston tweaked her (braless) nips before she came out, and she also had a drink or two (note the slurring). I will say that Aniston looks pretty good – like, her face looks great. Anyway, when Chelsea mentions Jennifer’s engagement Jennifer claims “I just got verklempt”. Chelsea calls Justin Theroux “the greatest guy ever… You guys make the greatest couple ever.” SO MUCH BETTER THAN BRANGELINA OMG. Blah. Chelsea is really LIVING in Jennifer’s ass these days. Chelsea is Jennifer’s snarling pit bull.

Meanwhile, Jennifer and Justin were recently spending time at the Marmont, and Us Weekly had all of the details (there weren’t many details – you can read the story here). Us Weekly’s jewelry expert claims Jennifer’s engagement ring is an 8 carat radiant cut diamond, worth approx. $500,000. I still think the rock is bigger than that, but God knows about the quality. I still think it looks like quartz.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and Jason Thomas/Filmmagic.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

209 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston appears on ‘Chelsea Lately’ to promote her engagement”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Bella says:

    I love her. She can’t do wrong. Go Jennifer!!!!

    • therealMimi says:

      Oh gawd get ahold of yourself. She’s a has been up for any attention. She’s nearing Kim K territory now.

    • Thalia says:

      We know thats what Jenloons think. Thanks for proving our point. Nice to know her fans think being a homewrecker is not ‘wrong’. Her fans are so obsessive and so brainwashed they truly think her shit don’t stink and that Aniston breaking up Justin and Heidi was not wrong, because normal rules don’t apply to Aniston. Ugh. They should do a study on the Aniston cult and its adherents. Real psych intervention needed with her fans.

  2. Hautie says:

    What?!

    No pictures of the ring, from Chelsea’s show?

    Did Chelsea not have Jennifer hold up her hand, so we all could get a good look at the ring?

    Then why was Jennifer even on the show to talk engagement and not show off the dang ring?!?

    I wanted to get a good look at that quartz! :)

    • Erinn says:

      Ahaha… but seriously. I hope that if it IS a diamond it looks a lot better than it does in the picture above. It looks so cloudy/gray.

      • Amelia says:

        If that is a diamond (and I’m assuming it is) they’ve really gone for quantity over quality.
        I’d much prefer a small, flawless stone rather than a big, fat, cloudy whopper of a rock. But, horses for courses, and all that jazz.
        I still think it looks like something you’d win in an arcade..

      • Erinn says:

        @Amelia

        Boyfriend and I were engagement ring shopping a month or so ago (he’s squirreled it away somewhere and is insisting I be surprised by the proposal since I know what the ring looks like), and the one that I really loved was a .41 carat with a beautiful sparkle and color to it. Being a suspicious buyer I looked at that thing for the longest time, trying to pick up flaws. My ring is certainly not giant, though we’re both just fresh out of school. The jeweler was surprised at the color grading because it’s one of the better ones they’ve sold in that pre-set design. I had looked at a larger stone in another store and I immediately found visible flaws. I’m too nitpicky with little things like that- I’d prefer a smaller stone with less flaws any day of the week.

      • Shitler says:

        @ Erinn. Congratulations on your impending engagement. Please let us know when & how it goes down. I’m a sucker for engagement stories

      • littlestar says:

        I agree, Amelia! I got engaged several months ago. My diamond is a one carat nearly perfect stone. There are no visible flaws in it. I’d rather have a smaller stone of superb quality than a huge cloudy, white looking diamond. I think my little one carat would sparkle like crazy next to Aniston’s murky eight carat stone :D .

      • megs283 says:

        @littlstar

        eek – are we really at a point where 1 carat is deemed “smaller”?

        Hollywood standards are not real life!

      • littlestar says:

        @meg – I actually have no clue what is considered “small” for diamonds lol. I’m guessing mine is average size? 8 carats seems enormous to me though! Looking at all the huge rings we’ve been seeing lately (Avril’s, Jennifer’s, Blake’s), I prefer my sparkly to theirs any day :D . Mine was given to me by my man out of love, sometimes I feel like celebrities engagement rings are more for show than meaning, if that makes sense.

      • Sally says:

        Woah, 1 carat is definitely not small!

  3. Jackie O says:

    between this desperate woman, the ridiculous chanel ad, and THE LEG, i really want these 3 people to go away.

    for the love of god, just go away.

  4. sukie says:

    i think its just a case of a friend helping out a friend with her first show in a new bigger studio.

    notice sandra didnt have anything to promote either..

    • jano1981 says:

      Thanks for the completely reasonable comment. That’s what I was thinking too. I don’t understand all the hate for Jennifer. She brings back hilarious memories from friends. But I’m also over (was never under) “the divorce” I get that She is probably vain and does a lot of facial treatments but so would I if I had that kinda dough.

      • Lithe says:

        ITA with you and OP. “Over me? When were you under me?” :)

      • Ilama says:

        Yes, why would a passive-aggressive person who threw a husband under a bus, did an interview attacking him, another one attacking his partner, mentioning her breakup and/or marriage in every single interview she does and who worst of all, hires Handler to make racist attacks on innocent children and call another woman vile and abusive names then walk on stage on cue grinning after that intro (not once, but twice this happened, so she was clearly ok with it the first time), well, why would she get any hate? I mean, none of the above is nasty, manipulative and spiteful is it? None of it is indicative of a spiteful, manipulative malovent person full of hatred for her ex’s partner. Why would anyone get any hate for that? I don’t understand it either. I just don’t understand that. (sarcasm) Bangs head. Some people truly can’t see very well. They must walk about with their eyes closed and ears blocked or see nothing wrong with that behavior. I just truly don’t ‘get’ how people don’t understand it. Do they have another Jennifer Aniston in mind, or do they just choose not to see what she does?

  5. K says:

    Me three. (this is regarding Team Jolie. Replied to the wrong comment).

  6. Vivian says:

    This proves that JA kinda supports Ch’s anti-Jolie rants. To me, it doesn’t seem like an accident that she’s promoting her engagement but seriously, who does this besides desperate celebs?

    • sukie says:

      if u watch the interview the engagement was only mentioned less than a minute.

      the headline is kinda misleading…they spent majority of the time talking about nipples, handler copying aniston and some other boring nonsense.

    • Kim says:

      Oh I’m sure they discussed Aniston’s charity work and movie project. Aniston is too private to discuss her personal life.

    • Eve says:

      This proves that JA kinda supports Ch’s anti-Jolie rants.

      KINDA supports? She’s probably behind some of them (if not all).

    • GrandPoobah says:

      Vivian: How does this ‘prove’ anything? Neither of them talked about Jolie.

      Does it also prove that Sandra Bullock agrees just because she was on the show as well? What about all her other guests? Do they tacitly agree with EVERYTHING CHELSEA HAS EVER SAID EVER?

      She literally talked about her engagement for 30 seconds of the interview. 30 seconds. Chelsea congratulated her, Aniston smiled and the audience clapped (for about 10 seconds is this) and then Aniston started talking about how Chelsea took her physical therapist. She wasn’t ‘promoting her engagement’-she talked about a number of inane things.

      Kim: Actually they did mention St. Jude’s.

      • kosy says:

        Plus Cameron Diaz, Gwyneth Paltrow, Charlize Theron, Reese Witherspoon. I mean, they’re all friends, so they must all endorse each others views, right?

        For some reason Chelsea seem quite popular among the A-list in Hollywood, and no they don’t need to befriend her so she’ll be nice to them, again, they’re A-list. So maybe she’s a fun, cool chick? I don’t really care for Chelsea, but it’s not a crime to dislike Jolie. Didn’t she hate Jolie before they became friends?

      • EmmaV1 says:

        Charlize had a meal with Chelsea once…and with other people.

        Reese and Gwen are no longer A-listers (in the strictest sense of the term) but solid B-Listers.

        Also, Charlize included, when I say they aren’t A-listers, they get A-list press coverage, but their box office draw at the moment is dismal.

        Don’t give me Iron Man crap (for Goop) and SWATH/Prometheus for Charlize because her solo effort 6 months prior to those 2 (young adult) bombed, despite good reviews.

        99% of ppl saw SWATH for the effects, the action, and lots of twihards….and for prometheus, that movie for sure no one cared if charlize was in it.

        Also, Chelsea did not hate jolie before she became pals with Aniston.

        She was merely all “Hey Jolie, your brother is calling…pucker up” and “Jolie, you need to stop adopting kids…aren’t your nipples tired from breast feeding them all”

        Now it’s “you’re a C**T” and

        See the difference?

      • Eve says:

        @ Kosy:

        Actually, Handler used to jokingly trash both. After she befriended Aniston, she stopped cracking jokes at her (which is understandable) while her negative comments on Jolie — and her children — increased.

        You’re right, it’s not a crime to dislike Jolie. But the way Handler expresses her hatred towards her is particularly disturbing. And, in my opinion, ends up making Aniston look bad. By constantly attacking Jolie and her children — as a way of showing support for Aniston — she’s actually doing her a disservice.

      • kosy says:

        @ Emma, you lost me at Charlize Theron not being A-list. She is. As are Gwyneth Paltrow and Reece Witherspoon. All have Oscars, all have stared in blockbusters, as well as respected low budget films. All are household names and have bankability. Pretty sure all have been on the Ulmer Scale 10.

        If you have some strange system where they are not A-list, then who is? Seriously. I’d love to know.

        @Eve, I agree that Chelsea got worse since they became friends, but that’s her prerogative. To say that she’s become Aniston’s mouthpiece when she’s always disliked Jolie is just silly.

        She could (should) tell her to stop, but I doubt if Chelsea would even listen. I’m English, C-nt does not offend me at all. But the kids should be off limits, I won’t deny. They should be off-limits for everything. Magazine covers, movie roles, etc. You really can’t have it both ways.

      • Eve says:

        @ Grandpoobah:

        Then we’ll have to keep on disagreeing with each other. Because I think it makes a LOT of sense that Handler’s vicious rants reflect on Aniston in a bad way.

        And to answer your question: yes, as a friend you can ask someone to stop joking about a certain high profile celebrity (and her children) — a person that is, in a way, connected to a painful moment of your past. If said friend is indeed your friend, she/he will stop doing that.

        @ Kosy:

        As Grandpoobah has said on this very said, we’re speculating here — just like some are speculating in Aniston’s favour, I think it’s fair to speculate that she has something to do with these rants considering Handler harped on Jolie almost immediately after having vacationed with her. Or that she called Jolie “evil” during the same show (not this one) Aniston was present.

        I can’t even say she cracks jokes at Jolie anymore. It’s usually a downright attack on her.

      • Emma says:

        @Eve

        Exactly. I wish people would stop saying she’s just a comic who is doing her job. She used to crack jokes about Angelina kissing her brother and adopting kids. Only after she became friends with Jen and Huvane took hold of her did she start making things so personal with Angelina. Calling someone an evil cunt multiple times and passing huge judgments like saying Brad is trapped are straight up attacks not jokes. It doesn’t take a genius to put two and two together. Jennifer obviously enjoys it. I mean, she is the woman who thought a carton implying Jolie’s murder was the “funniest thing she’s ever seen”.

      • RdyfrmycloseupmrDvlle says:

        @EmmaV1…I dont know where your getting all of your information from but Im in the business…I work for CAA and once youve won an oscar your permanent A list, ok?

      • Ilama says:

        Emma unfortunately I’m beginning to think those like GrandPoobah are a lost cause because they truly think Aniston can do no wrong, like the first poster said. They give no leeway and make no admissions, and will lie to cover up anything she does(such as trying to say Aniston doesn’t endorse Handler’s attacks, come on! Who are they trying to kid? and a woman’s nipples can possibly always be erect) that in any way reflects bad on her. They are Jenloons and cannot be reasoned with.

  7. Kim says:

    Handjob just told Access Hollywood on yesterday ‘s show ,she hasn’t seen the ring only a picture of it.

  8. pretty says:

    The uploader has not made this video available in your country.
    Sorry about that.
    :( :( :(

  9. Mimi says:

    That first pic sums up my feelings towards it all.

  10. CL says:

    I’m thinking JA wears nipple rings to keep those nips at attention. Even with tweaking, they wouldn’t be out ALL the time like hers are.

    I agree about the cloudiness of the ring. I haven’t seen it look non-cloudy yet.

  11. mln76 says:

    Well I hope she really is just being a Bridezilla because she’s so durn happy if this is all soley publicity grab boy is it well …pathetic and that does not bode well for the upcoming years the triangle is officially passe…her salary and box office are dwindling and the once subtle work she did is becoming obvious . Now that she’s about to be married up the interest is dying down so I really hope she can be content with her life no one wants her to end up like Demi Moore.

    • Micki says:

      She may still turn into the biggest Bridezilla known when you think for how long she had to ambush this ring.

    • diana says:

      No she ll never give up and her fan base still is considerable compared to demi. I think she’ll continue in small roles in movies, produce her fiance s movies or shift to tv.
      Mark my words she has proven herself to be highly ambitious and competitive esp with brange. I’m sure AJ will retire first followed by BP and only then JA.

      • mln76 says:

        @diana I think you are absolutely right about what she will do and that the Brange will retire first. I’m only saying as the attention fades if she’s not content with her hubby and her lower profile it will absolutely eat away at her that shes getting less attention and the stunts will amp up like up Demi’s bikini on Twitter

        BTW I’m kind of blown away that a person needs to have it explained why giving your Ring Pop engagement ring a press tour is Bridezilla behavoir

    • GrandPoobah says:

      Mln76: What about her behavior points to ‘Bridezilla’ to you?

      You do know what the term ‘Bridezilla’ refers to, right?

  12. Ranunculus says:

    I hope Justin, who is a talented writer knows what he is doing with getting involved with JA. She, who has very little talent, is all about fame whoring her private life for publicity.

  13. Toot says:

    Damn. I can’t believe I just watched that interview. Jennifer always seems like she’s on something to me and Chelsea lives in Aniston’s ass.

  14. Liv says:

    What is “verklempt” supposed to mean? It seems german but I don’t know that word.

  15. Cam S says:

    Chelsea’s show is my guilty pleasure. The comics she has on as hosts was a brilliant idea, and THEY are the real talent

  16. Belle Epoch says:

    Agree about THE LEG! I was going to ask when her accident occurred.

    Do we believe this guy paid $500,000 for a fake-looking ring all by himself? Doesn’t it seem like she bought it for herself?

    Team Jolie x 100

  17. Belle Epoch says:

    Verklempt is Yiddish. Why is a Greek girl using Yiddish?

    http://m.urbandictionary.com/#define?term=verklempt

  18. Bellebeesting says:

    Sandra bullock was promoting…what?

  19. Rhea says:

    Meh. I still think it doesn’t do any good for JA’s sweet “girl next door” image to be associated with CH.

  20. Jayna says:

    Sandra Bullock was brilliant. I give Chelsea credit for basically showing her droopy boobs on TV.

    I loved Jen’s outfit. Those black pants I want. It was very moving the way she teared up. It came on fast and out of nowhere and you could tell it was an honest moment of her joy.

    I have to admit Jen and Chelsea do seem like great girlfriends. I love live my girlfriends, so enjoy female commradery (ph). Can’t think this morning for spelling.

  21. abby says:

    I believe JA has had a boob job which tends to make the nipples stand at attention much more than without enhancement. there’s nothing really natural about JA anymore other than she still has a killer body! she is as high maitenance as Kim K! on the other hand, Chelsea seems to have very natural boobs. both are booze hounds and therefore my kind of girls :-D

    • Jayna says:

      Jen’s are natural. I have seen topless pics of here. My boobs are the same size and my nips are the same way. It can be embarrassing. Those late nite shows are freezing usually.

    • Rhea says:

      Not a fan of JA but I’m not going to quick pointing if it’s because of a boob job. I mean, I know personally a girl who has nipples like that without any help (although unlike JA, she wears padded bra whenever going out so people wouldn’t pay much attention to her nipples. :D ) So I would give her the benefit of the doubt.

    • Violet says:

      Yep, Jen has had a lot of work done over the years — including her breasts.

      Jen could be a spokesperson for good plastic surgery, because it all looks natural. Moreover, she spends a fortune having her hair colored, straightened and extended.

      That said, there are a ton of before and after shots so all skeptics have to do is google to see the evidence. Or watch an early episode of ‘Friends.’

  22. Miss Kiki says:

    I really can’t stand Chelsea Handler, she’s one of those people that just really grates on me.

  23. Jules says:

    Radiant cuts are square cut. That POS she’s wearing is not a radiant cut.

  24. spinner says:

    Never have thought much of Chelsea. Never watched any portion of her show, until now. I have to admit…this was entertaining & a perfect setting for silly entertainment news. Jennifer looks fantastic. So happy & healthy. I enjoyed.

  25. bej says:

    Is she blending his foundation in that third pic?

  26. EmmaV1 says:

    At least Jen, brad, Angelina all seem happy lately…..Chelsea seems to be the only one to seek out things that piss her off

  27. Green_Eyes says:

    Well… I am going to say something Nice for once… Loved Sandra B she was hilarious & Loved the lil kids in Chelsea’s commercials, they are so cute!

    Jen does have the ring on in her segment, u can’t help but notice it… Not a fan of her ring at all, still think cheap & gaudy looking if diamond. Looks more quartz to me… If she’s happy w/ it great, hope she wears it well.

  28. Liberty says:

    CH: Welcome MY FRIEND, Jennifer Aniston! (Welcome the c u next Tuesday who was too important to film the opening bit with me.)

    JA: That’s a big walk! I’m sweaty! I’m nervous for you! (You tweaking little freak, so you get Sandy to do the bit, making it look like maybe I have a body worse than hers! It’s on.)

    CH: Oh is that for me! Can I open it now! (I fear you a little, but not a lot, because the world is laughing at the mawky creme cheese ring Junior gave you)

    JA: It’s a swear jar! Get it! (Because you are a trash mouth whore! You almost got a Birkin Jypsiere bag until I saw the opening video backstage. Enjoy! My people quickly wrapped this leftover jug for you – like your sagging sisters, isn’t it, you horrific first-generation Hollywood commoner trying to make people think my body isn’t good enough, when you know I am holding out for a twenty million dollar Bond cameo) – Oh give the money to St. Jude for the kids! (See, ITW, PEOPLE, I love kids!)

    CH: I heard a rumor about you! (Two can play at this, because I know what you say about his hair dye and nose, you fake-eyed spoiled cow!) Are you pregnant? Three months? Six? (You look puffy)

    JA: Ha ha ha hell no kids are sh–! (Like I would destroy my star with an embryo?!) oh but I am ENGAGED And, verklempt! (French writers, like my Honey Euro Euro, say that all the time, you hick.) That’s Armenian for “gagging on my man’s joy” you know. We went to Sante Fe and—

    CH: — he’s a great guy and you are.. the greatest couple. (Hear that ticking? I may yet get him drunk and talking while you film your next crappy movie.) Will you cover up those bad boy nips for the wedding? (Is that why you refused the shower scene? we’d all see the rubber bullets? Bazinga!)

    JA: Maybe you should find someone willing to engage with YOU, and grow up! (Ha we all know you don’t have the money to buy a fiancé like mine!)

    CH: Ha, oh, by the way, you NEVER ever do nudity in your films, do you? (now for sure everyone thinks you have cheek droop, vag pooch and alien nips, in addition to a flea market ring from a random short dude)

    JA: Why, no, never! (YOU ARE DOOMED!) My–

    CH: — see you later. (No, you will not wave that candy ass ring on camera on my new show, and anyway it’s probably time to drop another silver dollar in Justin’s slot. Yeah, it’s on!)

    • Green_Eyes says:

      Liberty..tooo funny. Don’t know how many others…but u hit dead on some thoughts that ran thru my mind listening to those two…others you surpassed my own sarcastic thoughts;)! Love it!

    • blonde on the dock says:

      Sorry but I don’t find your exchanges all that funny or interesting. I’m not sure why others encourage you. It’s actually quite mean and weird and effed up that you do this. I just dont get it.

    • Chell says:

      LOVE your posts, they always make me laugh & I totally get them! ‘Cream cheese ring’ was the best!

    • Leah says:

      I love you Liberty, keep them coming :lol:

    • videli says:

      ‘You look puffy’, hahaha. All I can say is that you could use your talent professionally also.

    • zut alors! says:

      I, for one, love your posts. I think they’re witty, well-written and show you have a sly sense of humor. I look forward to many more from you.

      • Camille (TheOriginal) says:

        I agree with you. Liberty’s writing is clever and hilarious. It is brilliant stuff.

        @Liberty: Don’t let the Aniston Apologists/Loonifers put you off posting. We all know that if you were writing similar things about other celebs (especially if it was a particular couple with a bunch of kids..) they’d be laughing away etc.
        If they can’t handle the snark/wit then they should go find an actual fan site to worship at.

      • Sugar says:

        agree! Liberty has a great play on words & the humor is a lot like mine I’m just not nearly as witty as her on the fly. A story can post & she’s on it-zing- that is talent. She is having FUN with these stories that’s all.

    • Josephina says:

      Liberty, my dear, you have a gift. You are quick-witted and your sarcasm is delicious.

      On other sites we talk about your posts and some of us copy and repost your hilarious thoughts for those that do not visit CB. Keep up the entertainment!

      BTW, never mind Blonde On The Dock et al. They see nothing wrong with Chelsea’s consistent piss-poor personal attacks on Jolie, Brad and their racist jokes on their children. Chelsea is not a racist, right? How could she be? She rolled around in the hay with “Fitty Cents” for a few weeks…so that makes her “cool,” huh?

      • Ilama says:

        +1 Anyone who thinks Liberty’s witty posts (far more wittier than MK at DListed, who I think is a dud and as funny as a fart in an elevator) are in any way remotely offensive, yet have no problems with Aniston, Aniston’s nasty hateful fans and Handler bullying, abusing, hounding and harassing an entire family for 8 years clearly has more than a few screws loose and their morals completely back to front. Liberty has never said anything nasty or hateful about Aniston, unlike Aniston, her despicable fans and Handler. You would have to have more than a few screws loose to criticize someone who doesn’t bully or attack anyone, but to support a manipulative and toxic bitch who does all she can to fan the flames of hate at her ex. Seriously. I cannot believe even Anistonloons are that stupid to play that angle. FAIL.

  29. jojo says:

    a couple of things here. Anyone who excercises as much as she does would lose those breasts quite quickly. Its usually one of the first things to go when becoming ‘lean’. Not too many woman can be that lean/muscular and still have the perfect breast shape/size.

    That and factor in that with her breast size and her >40 age, the fact she has 0 sag is quite skeptical.

    She’s definately had a lift, and more likely than not, had implants to let her continuing with the lean body and keep her shape..

  30. Roxy says:

    Become an A-lst celeb with marginal talent, funny & perky personality, famous friends, famous ex husband, and designers will start throwing their sh** at you, FREE!!!! Do it!!

  31. RobN says:

    How come we don’t all take shots at Sandra Bullock for coming on to support a friend when she doesn’t have anything to promote? I realize that it doesn’t fit in with the narrative we’re trying to create here, but the hypocrisy does get a little tiring.

    • Leigh Worchestershire says:

      Well, if Sandra had been the sort of woman who could put CH up to crucifying someone’s little children and their mother on tv, we’d probably be rolling our eyes at her too.

      But Sandy (whose husband actually DID cheat) was far too classy for such things and would never exploit another person’s family for YEARS just to make a buck. The two women are hardly comparable.

      And yes, the fact that Aniston takes vacations with CH and keeps coming on her show shows that she condones and encourages her behavior.

      • GrandPoobah says:

        ‘And yes, the fact that Aniston takes vacations with CH and keeps coming on her show shows that she condones and encourages her behavior.’

        I disagree. She’s her friend but that doesn’t mean she agrees with everything she says, always and forever.

        ‘encouraging her behavior’? There is literally no way to know that except if Aniston came right out and said that. You’re just speculating.

      • Ilama says:

        Don’t you just love how everything Aniston does is all such a coincidence. Her walking on stage on cue grinning like a Cheshire cat after Handler attacked Jolie and her children “doesn’t mean she shares Handler’s views”. Aniston and Handler go away on a vacation for 2 on return Handler immediately launches into her most verocious and vicious attack on Angelina yet, but “that doesn’t mean anything. That doesn’t even mean that they discussed Angelina on the vacation”. Yet, Brad and Jen separate, a few months after which Brad starts dating his co-star Angelina, but that AUTOMATICALLY MEANS HE CHEATED in Jenloons eyes. The hypocrisy is beyond mind-blowing. :(

      • GrandPoobah says:

        Ilama: I see you’ve got the Talking Points down. Grinning like a Cheshire Cat? Get some new material.

        Smiling as you come out for an interview is kind of normal…

        I’ve never said anything regarding your last point because frankly, I don’t know what happened in that whole situation. I just don’t like how people treat Aniston like she personally burned down their home. Sorry, you won’t find any hypocrisy here.

      • Ilama says:

        Yet you’re perfectly fine with people acting for 8 years like Angelina personally burned down their home? That there, is the hypocrisy. Get used to people attacking Aniston because if Angelina was attacked for 8 years and witch hunted for no reason at all, we have a way to go to even the score. Come back here after Aniston has been witch hunted and abused and attacked and had death wishes for 8 years. Then you’ll have a point. Its a bit rich whinging so soon into it. Did it ever occur to you, even for one minute, that we don’t like how your Team has treated Angelina?

      • GrandPoobah says:

        Ilama: Moving the goal posts, I see. Couldn’t catch me being a hypocrite the first time so you’ve switched arguments. Nice try. I haven’t said anything about Jolie and I never will.

        And I think your crusade to ‘even the score’ is childish.

  32. Anon says:

    Do stars always do this? Go on a talk show to talk about getting engaged? Are they that desperate for PR?

  33. lulu says:

    I hate Jolie as much as some of you hate Aniston. But I would never ask you not to post your vitriol and disgust. Tee hee. That way I’m free to do the same for the fauxmanitarian st. angie ho.

  34. G says:

    Because Sandra Bullock has not spent the last 7 years making a career by engineering tabloid sympathy for her failed marriage, empty womb and frosted hair.

  35. Mystic says:

    I don’t get where all the excitement about getting married in your forties comes from….I think it’s exciting if it’s your first marriage but the second one is not exciting…..kind of like when you have your first kid it’s a huge deal, but when you get to the second or third the excitement is a lot less….

  36. lucy2 says:

    I don’t have any problem with people going on shows without something to promote. People do it on Craig Ferguson’s show all the time.

    I don’t get anyone being friends with Chelsea though. Her motives just seem way too transparent.

    • poppy says:

      she shares the same/agent/pr/manager as goop, jennifer anniston, rosie huntingtostonian whitlbocker, helen hunt (she’s still alive!), don cheadle, anne hathaway, julian moore, liv tyler, meg ryan, etc, he does something for tom ford. that’s stephen huvane. his brother kevin handles the really big “stars” (sandra bullock, meryl streep, tom cruise, oprah, (goes on and on).
      the huvanes have her hooked up. i don’t think chelsea would still have a show if it weren’t for that connection.

  37. Ellie66 says:

    Sometimes I like her sometimes not. But this morning I heard on our local news ( Albuquerque) that the resort she is staying at while filming some movie fired a driver for telling another guest that Jennifer was very sweet and more petite than he thought. Apparently one of her assistants overheard and they canned the poor guy. That sucks so I don’t like her right now!

    • RobN says:

      The resort has a privacy policy that says that employees aren’t supposed to be gossiping about celebrity guests. Even if they said something nice, the resort has a pretty big interest in ensuring that employees don’t pass tidbits along to anybody, including the paparazzi, tabloids, and just plain looky loos.

      • cs says:

        oh pleaz, he was a tour bus driver making $30k a year and She’s walking around with a $500k ring.
        According to driver, the guests spotted her at the hotel and he just confirmed it was her and that she’s very sweet in person.
        It’s amazing that in this economy that there would be more sympathy for the poor bus driver who’s trying to support himself and perhaps his family on a $30k salary. And this B is walking around like her A** don’t stink wearing a Big, Gaudy $500k ring.

      • Ilama says:

        CS, Anistonloons have no sympathy for anyone, not even Heidi Bivens whose home Aniston destroyed and man she stole. Aniston is America’s Patron Saint of Always Right and Perfect. She is never wrong. Her fans are so starry-eyed and infatuated with her they will excuse everything and anything she does to other human beings, because Aniston must have what Aniston wants and who cares who is in the way and gets hurt? Like that poor working class bus driver, they are just collateral damage because Aniston’s needs and wants come before any other living human being. Bah humbug, that and the posts on here make me hate Aniston and her fans more than I thought was humanly possible.

    • Kim says:

      Employees at hotels, resorts sign confidentiality statement I think.Not allowed to reveal stuff about guest.

      • Ellie66 says:

        Yeah they do, but we get a lot of actors around here and this is the first time this has happened. Mark Walberg is a sweetie and so is Samuel Jackson they were way cool when filming here. In fact they filmed part of The Avengers here and they were no reports of them being a snot! Samuel even play in a golf tournament here.

      • Ellie66 says:

        Yeah they do, but we get a lot of actors around here and this is the first time this has happened. Mark Walberg is a sweetie and so is Samuel Jackson they were way cool when filming here. In fact they filmed part of The Avengers here and they were no reports of them being a snot! Samuel even play in a golf tournament here. She seems snotty!

    • Loira says:

      How sad. They should have reprimended him, not firing him. If this were the JPs, those crazies from FF would be harping on them.

      • pwal says:

        Well, color me surprised that the Aniston fans are employing situational ethics in this instance. Much like when the Jolie-Pitts’ bodyguards were detained in India for making a racial slur (which turned out not to be true), but it was honky dorey when Aniston’s bodyguard made a derogatory slur towards a Canadian photog’s girlfriend and she assisted him in fleeing Vancouver versus having him talk to the cops about the incident.

        Per Lainey.

        Won’t dwell too hard on the follow up story which consisted of Aniston striking up a conversation with a couple that was of the same race as the girlfriend…

  38. dooliloo says:

    “It is a journey. Every journey starts, and I go on.

    The world turns, and I want it to turn around me. Plans appear, Ego take over.

    And wherever I go, there you are, my ring, my ring, my ring.

    The Ring No. 5, inevitable”

  39. Emma says:

    Jennifer Aniston is a huge attention seeking famewhore? Shocking. I’m glad people are finally realizing what a pathetic woman she is. It’s going to be hilarious when Justin dumps her.

  40. vvy says:

    How can anyone ever take Jen Aniston seriously when all she ever does is manipulate media and expose her private life all the time? Serious actors don’t want the audience to know too much about their private lives cause it makes it too hard to suspend disbelief. Which is why superstar gay actors still needs beards. i have zilcho respect for this woman, and even less for Handler. Tons for Sandra Bullock…she has no need to divulge every detail of her private life. She’s a class act.

    • lola says:

      Well, you said it – serious actors. She hasn’t made a decent movie in a long long time. Office Space was great, I also liked The Good Girl, but those are Indie flicks 10+ years ago.
      As for Chelsea, I used to love her but the constant name dropping has gotten old. She should stick to making fun of celebrities and their behavior.

  41. joyce says:

    Handjob is kissing Aniston @ss big time. I’m against anyone going on T.V. shows to promote their movie. That’s his/her job. This woman said she is very private and simple then why the hell she went on T.V. to talk about it. I have to admit. Aniston is very smart when it comes to promoting her so called private simple life. She uses Handjob and O to have they do her dirty work.

  42. videli says:

    Handler seems like a harbor for almost out of work freighters (awkward simile, but I’m have one in front of me). Paltrow, Diaz, Ritterspoon, Aniston, all blonde, all better known a decade or two ago, all chasing fame rather than good roles. Handler’s shtick seems to be that she’s the downtrodden, boozy blonde, of whom the others can freely make fun. More respect to Amy Adams or Jessica Chastain, solid actresses of which I don’t know anything.

  43. lulu says:

    Hate to break it to you, but not everyone thinks Jolie is the sexiest or most beautiful woman alive. Just sayin’

  44. anneesezz says:

    I never get tired of reading the comments when there is a story about Jennifer Aniston, Angeline Jolie or Brad Pitt. I absolutely love when their rabid fans come out with all kinds of “facts” to defend or trash their side. Good stuff.

  45. LeslieM says:

    Sandra Bullock is the kind of person who can take her clothes off and do a bit in a shower with CH and still come off as America’s sweetheart. Jennifer Aniston’s long since lost that moniker.

  46. skuddles says:

    Aniston should get help for her drinking problem. She appears to be incapable of doing any kind of live appearance anymore without boozing it up in advance. The drinking might also explain her really shitty taste in friends.

  47. jwoolman says:

    I think people go way too far trying to analyze a comedian’s jokes. I haven’t heard Handler say much if anything about Jolie on her show in the past year. She went after Jolie before especially on a tour, where the same stuff is repeated again and again if it works, I’m sure because her audience responded well to it. If her Jolie stuff fell flat, she would have dumped it. The younger crowd especially likes mocking people who are on the verge of canonization and Jolie is well known. Aniston doesn’t get such treatment because there isn’t much to say, she’s more of a neutral low-key person who doesn’t register with Handler’s audience the same way. Handler goes after anybody if her audience thinks it’s funny, I didn’t see all this special “hate” some folks here see in every word Handler utters about Jolie. She’s not a fan, but that’s true about many of her targets. She’s just a comedian working her audience. If you’re not her audience, just ignore her. And she doesn’t go out of her way to bash Jolie in interviews, just answers questions when asked. And her answers aren’t likely to be nicely nicely because guess what – she’s a comedian and her style has never been nicely nicely. I really think nobody would think twice about any of this if Handler were male, but females have this stereotypical expectation of being nurturing and soothing to deal with.

    • luce says:

      Oh please ……Handler is a pig !

    • Emma says:

      Calling someone you don’t know an evil cunt is not a joke. She’s not joking when she does interview after interview talking about Angelina like she killed her dog. Tons of comics make fun of Angie for her old antics and her adopting, that’s fine. Calling someone evil, a cunt, saying their husband is trapped in a relationship because of the kids is personal. There’s a difference between jokes and trashing someone. Chelsea does the latter when it comes to Jolie.

      • Jayna says:

        Bingo. Making fun of the usual stuff is fine. But this last round was beyond personal. It was hate, not comedy. I know the difference. Jen had no responsibility to Angelina or Brad to ask her to stop her usual raling on Angie. But this last round, sorry, but the viciousness reflects badly on Jen, like she’s still not let go and her BFF goes in for the kill in a very personal way because of her wronged friend.

      • jwoolman says:

        On tour, most of her audience is college age. The language she used was aimed straight at what the audience eats up. Not my preference either, but that’s the context. Also with Handler, her words sound much worse in print than in delivery – body language, tone of voice, how much is responding to a live audience in the heat of the moment etc. are all important in understanding comic routines. She talks differently on her show, which is a quieter environment with an older live audience. Also like most comedians, sometimes she hits it right and sometimes she doesn’t. When she misses – laughs are like buses, just wait for the next one. If you don’t like her style, just avoid her.

        I grew up watching icons like Bob Hope and Jack Benny. Couldn’t stand Hope (he always made me cringe) but Benny made me laugh without a word and still does in old episodes (likewise for Bob Newhart and the character Hyacinth Bucket-pronounced-Bouquet on the britcom Keeping Up Appearances).. I always had limited tolerance for George Burns also (feel the same about Jay Leno…) I remember Bill Cosby when he was getting started as a standup – liked him ok at first, but after a season or two of his tv show, I would rather not listen to him. Heresy, I know. Couldn’t stand Don Rickles but obviously loads of other people loved him. Anyway, I learned early that humor is very individual. If I don’t like someone’s work, it doesn’t mean they’re bad comedians or bad people.

    • lisa2 says:

      Here’s the thing. I don’t see male comedians doing that in their acts. It is sad to me that a woman like her is calling another woman such a filthy name. You can say whatever. But you don’t see male comedians doing that the way this woman does. And if you ever saw the history of her show Aniston was a target. . And when she is saying Brad Pitt needs to leave his family and go back to Aniston.. well that is not impersonal. That is something completely different. It has been hashed over before so I’m done.

      HANDLER IS A ________ (PICK YOUR OWN WORD) I’ll just leave it there.

    • Janet says:

      How would you “analyze” making racist comments about someone’s children? All in good fun?

  48. zut alors! says:

    spinner says:
    October 16, 2012 at 2:14 pm
    @ blonde on the dock

    Yeah, looks like people still enjoy a good witch hunt followed up by a burning at the stake. Scary, indeed.
    ****************************************************

    Girl, please! Did you type all that with a straight face? Stop with the histrionics. It is NOT that serious.

    • Ilama says:

      pmsl I love how they think its perfectly fine and ok to support a person who speared an 8 year long witch hunt against a woman that never did anything to her and never hurt anyone, but the minute the same is done to Aniston, out of retaliation, they cry foul and get all upset. Such hypocrisy. Maybe they should have thought about witch hunts 8 years and now, when they actively SUPPORT one against a woman who has never done anything but good. The moral gymnastics and hypocrisy of Jenloons really does ones head in. Jen fans are the very LAST people on this earth, who should complain about ‘witch hunts’. smdh

  49. Janet says:

    Oh well, since every Aniston thread ends up being as much about Jolie as Aniston and vice-versa (the symbiosis is here to stay, it seems like), I liked this piece on Angie:

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/16/angelina-jolie-we-all-are-malala.html

  50. sullivan says:

    jwoolman, your transgression has not gone unnoticed. How could you use comic legends Bob Hope, Bob Newhart, George Burns, and Bill Cosby to defend that slagbeast Chelsea Handler? Sacrilege!

  51. RdyfrmycloseupmrDvlle says:

    Holy Moly!! Her face is horrendous in that first pic!!!! Shes venturing into joan rivers territory. Ive never seen her look for ANCIENT, puffy and weird!!!…..scary.