Jan 19
'07
Sin City 2 rumors have Rachel Weisz or Rose McGowan replacing Angelina
'07
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Angelina Jolie, Movies, Photos, Rachel Weisz
- Top five cutest dogs in movies [Evil Beet]
- Lady Gaga’s schtick is getting so old [Lainey Gossip]
- Bobbi Kristina was hospitalized after her mom Whitney Houston passed [D-Listed]
- Kellan Lutz’s ridic new facial hair [Go Fug Yourself]
- Katy Perry checks out Rihanna’s cleavage [Fark]
- Tom Cruise carries Suri in a blanket [Popsugar]
- Zooey Deschanel on SNL [Pajiba]
- Vanessa Hudgens wears fur [Celebslam]
- Matt Bomer sort-of came out. He wasn’t out already? [The Daily Wh.at]
- Bruce Willis and his pregnant wife [INF Daily]
Its being reported by several web sites that Rose McGowan is not in Sin City 2.
Thank god for that, the majority of fans are happy that Rachel Weisz is getting the role.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She is a coke addict, they won’t take this risk!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
“most movie sites favoring Rose McGowan”
Excuse me but the majority of the sites i have been on are saying the opposite. Some of them are even saying that Rachel might be an even better choice for the role than Angelina.
I dont know where you are getting your information but its wrong.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I was speaking about MC Ghostwan, not Angelina or Rachel.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Pick Rachel, for the love of God, pick Rachel Weisz!!
McGowan’s already in Grindhouse, and I’m sorry but if I was asked which dame I’d kill for I know what my answer would be.
Definitely NOT Rose McGowan.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Rachel > Rose
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Wow does Rose look bad! I wish these women wouldn’t think that bad plastic surgery will revive their careers. She kind of looks like Terri Hatcher in these close ups.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I’m going to try not to geek out too hard here, but the character of Ava in “A Dame to Kill For” is just that: a totally irresistible woman in every sense of the word. And Rachel would be my choice out of the three. However, if they are going to stay as faithful to the original book as possible, the Ava role does require a bit of nudity (although, so did Jessica Alba’s character from the first one, Nancy, but she refused to do it), and I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Rachel Weisz doesn’t want to do any more nudity. Ahem, I, uh, think that’s it.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I wouldn’t pick either one of them. They don’t come to mind as being one of the actresses who can pull off an action role. Angelina can do that, but they probably aren’t going to wait for her and want to film now. That’s why people don’t go to see movies anymore, they aren’t cast right.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
what the hell did she do to her face? looks like she gave herself an eye lift with a butterknife and scotch tape…
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Rachel is a much better actress than Angelina, so she would be much better in the role.
Report this comment as spam or abuse