Kourtney Kardashian’s old lover still claims he could be Mason Disick’s father

Back in 2009-2010, there was some minor drama about Kourtney Kardashian’s baby-daddy drama. Kourtney gave birth to Mason Dash Disick in December 2009 after getting pregnant when she and Scott Disick were kind-of broken up earlier in the year. Shortly after Kourtney gave birth, a rapper/model named Premo Stallone (real name: Michael Girgenti) claimed that he had a brief affair with Kourtney around the same “baby-making” time-frame. They had met on a photo shoot, and they spent some time together and even slept together. First, Michael told his story to the tabloids with a giant “I might be the father” version of events, then he went to the tabloids to claim that he was demanding a paternity test and he wanted to know for sure if Mason was his. Then… nothing. Nothing has really happened with the story since 2010. I assumed the Kardashians had paid off Premo or that he was simply “taken care of”. But now he’s back!

In a new bombshell paternity claim, LA-based model Michael Girgenti, who worked with Kourtney Kardashian on a 944 magazine photo shoot in 2008, exclusively tells this week’s In Touch that he believes he is potentially Mason Disick’s biological father. In the new issue of In Touch, on newsstands now, Michael details the alleged encounter, which he claims was nine months before Mason’s birth.

“We started kissing, making out and touching each other. We were fooling around on the couch for a little while before I took her to the bedroom,” Michael tells In Touch of his alleged March 2009 fling with Kourtney, when she told him she was on a break from her boyfriend, Scott Disick. Then, he says, they headed to his room: “I slipped her clothes off. She helped me undress, and we fell into bed.”

Nine months later, on Dec. 14, 2009, Kourtney gave birth to baby Mason. She was back together with Scott —her longtime boyfriend and the publicly acknowledged father of her children, but Michael firmly believes the 3-year-old could be his son. “After he was born and I saw photos of him,” the 26-year-old tells In Touch, “I began to wonder.”

Michael claims the two communicated by BlackBerry Messenger, but says that after they were intimate during their third hangout at his Glendale, Calif., apartment, Kourtney went silent despite his attempts to reach her.

Kourtney acknowledges working with Michael at the shoot — but the rest, says her attorney, is fiction. “They did not exchange contact information. Since the August 20, 2008, on-set photo shoot, Kourtney never spoke with him, saw him nor met him again. Kourtney has never been alone with him, and Kourtney certainly has never physically/intimately been with Mr. Girgenti,” says her lawyer, who calls Michael’s suggestion that he could be Mason’s father “preposterous and an outrageous lie.”

But Michael insists it all happened and first went public after Mason’s birth, hoping Kourtney would agree to a DNA test for Mason. Now he’s speaking out again in hopes it will “finally push them into taking the DNA test,” says the Chicago native, who says he just wants the truth. “I would definitely want to acknowledge Mason if he’s my kid,” Michael says. “He deserves to know his real father.”

[From In Touch Weekly]

It’s interesting, right? Personally, I wouldn’t doubt that Kourtney was sleeping with other men around the same time frame (like mother, like daughter), and it’s possible that Kourtney really doesn’t know. Or that she simply hopes that Scott is truly the father, which… hey, it’s a more than solid possibility. I think Scott really loves Mason and from what I’ve seen, Scott loves being a dad (even if Scott is a douche to Kourtney). Anyway, I doubt anything will come of this, but I was just happy that Premo Stallone is still around.

Cover courtesy of In Touch Weekly. Additional photos by Fame/Flynet and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

100 Responses to “Kourtney Kardashian’s old lover still claims he could be Mason Disick’s father”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Laurabb says:

    That boy looks just like Scott IMO.

  2. Belle Epoch says:

    The mother/daughter parallels are amazing. This family seems amoral. Hope they get a paternity test. The kid has never resembled Scott – who, to his credit, doesn’t seem to mind.

  3. RobN says:

    I might have bought it if the second baby didn’t look like a total carbon copy of the first.

  4. Deedee says:

    He definitely looks like a kardashian and his pants are too tight as well!

  5. bella says:

    ya think?

    i don’t…

    he looks EXACTLY like his grandfather – Robert Kardashian to me.

  6. Annie says:

    Scott looks hot with facial hair. Someone end this. I don’t enjoy this feeling.

  7. Kota says:

    Whether or not Scott is Mason’s father biologically (I believe he is), his name is on his birth certificate, Mason has Scott’s last name and Scott has been raising him since birth, to Scott, Mason is his son and to Mason, Scott is his dad either way. Just my opinion.

  8. Joanna says:

    boy, this guy’s sure looking for a payout,isn’t he? i need to meet some famous people so i can sell fake stories to tabloids. this b.s. was passed around awhile back, how many times are they going to recycle this b.s?

  9. Winnie says:

    Maybe he wants a (second?) payday? If he was really concerned about paternity, he would file a motion in court to compel DNA testing, not go to a tabloid.

  10. well... says:

    Like mother like daughter? #khloe

  11. paola says:

    we have a King Mida situation: everything a Kardashian touches becomes not gold but a douche.

  12. Palermo says:

    We are losing ratings so let’s make up some more fake drama!

  13. The Original G says:

    So, is Scott really a douche or is that just his storyline?

    • Annie says:

      He has been a douche. There was a horrible episode where he fought with Kourtney while she was carrying the baby. Lots of screams. He then broke a mirror and just caused a huge scene. He drinks a lot too. One time he shoved a dollar down a waiter’s mouth to prove how rich he was and how this guy was nothing. If I were Kourtney I would’ve dumped him because of the way he treated that poor guy. Despicable. Nobody said anything.

      To his credit he was made some changes. He’s really not that bad anymore, but I think it’s only because he was threatned to be left out of the franchise, and I guess being rich by doing nothing is better than getting a real job, so he’s cleaned up his act a bit.

      • The Original G says:

        Yeah, I know. My question is “is that just his storyline?” His reality character? You know it’s not all real right?

      • Annie says:

        Just because certain story lines are manipulated and scripted, it doesn’t mean that EVERYTHING about the show and them as people is fake. So Kim is not a spoiled brat then? And Rob is not really an overeating slob that does nothing with his life? And Kris is not a stage mom? And Kris Humphries was not a neanderthal douche? And Bruce is not a pushover? And the little ones are not being forced to be models? You do get a real peek at what these people are like in real life just by waching the show, even if some things are scripted for dramatic effect. And if everything was so manipulated, then I don’t know a single man who would agree to be portrayed as an abusive drunk, bad partner, bad father, useless free loader. None. Scott was terrible for years and he legitimately has a drinking problem. His violent scenes were real, and you could tell by the way Kourtney was crying, because she’s usually very robotic and vacant. They exploited that stuff for the show, which is unfair considering her sisters got fairy tale weddings to boost the show. If anything, his funny remarks and Nice Dad Scott might be scripted, along with his idiotic Lord Disick douchebaggery. Because the guy did a 180 in just a few months. And these people don’t want anything to ruin their brand, like their reputations and personalities are not doing that already. So you best believe he was ordered to clean up, or else.

        TL;DR: to answer your question, of course his horrible traits are real and they should not be dismissed as ~storylines~. These are all horrible people. All of them. I guess minus Bruce, who I legitimately see as good guy who is not respected in that household. And Kourtney, who seems to be a good mom and never says the awful stuff Kim & Klhoe say to her or to each other. Everyone else is spoiled, petty, rude, spiteful, manipulative, whiney, superficial, lazy, and lacking a moral compass. Their personalities are not storylines. They’re awful people. And making millions for putting it on tv.

      • The Original G says:

        So, then why would they keep Scott on the show? Why would they live together. Why would Kris manage his personal appearances and why would Kourtney have a second child with him?

        This is like wrestling folks. Scott’s earning his living being the series villain? They got rid of the Hump quick enough when he didn’t tow the party line. More and more this seems like wrestling.

        Please don’t take this personally, but your emotional reaction proves the value of this storyline to the franchise. These aren’t people. They’re characters and products.

      • FLORC says:

        Agree G. Every time he is out without a camera he’s just a normal guy, dressed casually, out with his kid. He may have been an alcoholic at one point, but he seems 5o have worked through it.

      • Sassy says:

        Its reality TeeVee, People! Disick could be a stellar human being, but we will never know. His “role” on the K Show is to be an A–hole, and he is playing it. if the K’s and family are all that they portray on the screen we all should be very afraid. They are all laughing on the way to the bank. It is all schtick!

      • Jenny says:

        I’m pretty sure most, if not all of the plot lines you mentioned, have been reported on for or up for debate as to the level of veracity/staged-ness. As I read, I thought, “I could easily believe all that was scripted.” I think most/all reality shows are much more scripted than they would have us believe.

  14. Holden says:

    Traditional things like knowing who the father is and wedding before having kids don’t keep the Kraptashians down!

    • Annie says:

      Or a divorce before getting knocked up by homeone else!!

      Flash on the outside, trash on the inside.

    • Sam says:

      I don’t think it’s a big deal that Kourtney and Scott didnt get married before having kids. Kim got married and look how that turned out. Kris Jenner married Robert Kardashian and had an affair and now there are paternity issues over Khloe. I don’t think Kourtney and Scott being married would improve things in any way.

      If she’s unsure about who the baby daddy is though, that is uncool. If there was an issue though, I’m sure Kris would try to pimp it out for an episode, or even a two-hour special. She doesn’t care about privacy or little things like.. Her grandson’s well being.

  15. FLORC says:

    What’s so hard about submitting to a paternity test. If even for medical history only.
    They have enough money and lawyers that can write up a contract. If “premo” wants a test and is the father he can give up parental rights. If they paid him to go away in the past and he did he should step aside forever imo. Scott seems like a great dad and he’s a douche to Kourtney, but she’s equally bad right back.

  16. fabgrrl says:

    Or hey, maybe Kourtney was sleeping with two men at the same time, but was smart enough to use a diaphragm with the one she didn’t want to get pregnant by?

    This guy sounds sketchy as hell. And why is he a model?

  17. brin says:

    Premo Stallone? There must be a sex tape.

    • Lauren says:

      I agree. That line stood out to me as well. It’s supposed to make me stop and judge Kourtney because *Oh Noes!* she was sleeping around during their break. But it doesn’t. It just makes me judge the writer for trying to create false drama.

  18. Talie says:

    The brow area kind of matches.

  19. SamiHami says:

    The kid looks exactly like Scott. There’s no doubt in my mind that he’s the father.

  20. EmmaStoneWannabe says:

    Even if they had a DNA test and this random turned out to be the actual father, you think we would know about it? I doubt it…while this fam does not have many secrets, I do believe if this happened, they would keep it under wraps in every way possible… That being said, I agree the baby looks VERY much like Scott, IMO. And I agree that since he has been “raising” this boy since birth, it does no service to their bond to now discover/publicize if he weren’t the actual father.

  21. WhatVille says:

    Mason looks nothing like Scott.
    I think that guy is his father.
    They have the same swarthy/darker complexion and facial features.

    • FLORC says:

      Mason looks like Kourtney and the men of Kourtney’s side. This guys “butt” chin, lips, and eyes don’t carry over to Mason’s features. You’d think at least 1 of those would be passed on and we could see it at this point. If these were my only 2 options i’d have to say scott wins.

  22. swack says:

    If he was truly serious about this paternity test, the guy would one – keep it private and two, get a court order for one if you want one so badly. Another person looking for fame.

  23. Jane says:

    Seems the Kardashian/Jenner clan is getting exactly what they want. Multiple tabloid and blog posts without doing a damn thing worthwhile.

    They seem to have everyone exactly where they want them and are getting attention, attention, attention!

  24. fabgrrl says:

    I have zero problem with people having multiple sex partners, as long as everyone is being honest about it. But I have a HUGE problem with said people being sloppy about birth control. To me, THAT is immoral. Potentially creating a new life, a new person, because you are too thoughtless to unroll a condom or take a pill.

    • Jenny says:

      Not defending Kourtney, because I don’t know what her situation was, but I got pregnant while taking the pill and I know a number of women who had the same situation. In fact another woman at my job and I were pregnant at the same time and we had both been on the pill.

      • ShaCur says:

        I don’t doubt this happens, but I’ve never met anyone whose bc failed. the only time I’ve heard anything remotely like this is if it isn’t taken regularly. Again it is only 99%effective but I doubt it happens nearly as much as people say, or that they’re willing to admit. Plus, bc doesn’t protect against STIs…it saddens me that so few people consider STIs AND pregnancy when they choose to have casual sex/multiple partners. I’m totally down for whatever people want to do, just protect yourself, and others.

  25. truthful says:

    and we’ll never know…

  26. teehee says:

    What does this guy care except that there is MONEY to be had. Just disgusting– no average man chases after a mother, except if she is rich or famous. Asshat. if he really cared, about either mother or child or their new marriage,he would pursue this matter privately!! Asshat!

  27. moon says:

    Nah, he looks too much like Scott.

  28. Sam says:

    Agreed. There is absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping with someone while she was single. The only problem arises when you’re unsure of your child’s paternity and don’t inform those involved, but honestly, I don’t think this Premo guy has much if a case. Let’s not shame Kourtney for being young and single and *gasp* sleeping with someone. I think she has much better morals that Kris. In an episode of the show, she was berating Kris for her decision to have an affair and said she couldn’t understand doing that to your children (probably reading from a script, but maybe true).

  29. janie says:

    Think we’ll play this with Kim? Anything for attention? Where is Kanye? I think Kourtney has more morals than that.. She is a terrific mom & adores them! Who cares?

  30. shanaynay says:

    I could see that dude being the father, they have similar eyes! I don’t really see Scott in Mason except for the lighter complexion/hair.

  31. Dawn says:

    News Flash: Poor Robert Kardashian’s family are all a-moral money hunger fame whores who will sell out anyone to get what they want. I had thought that this Kourtney was the most sane of the bunch until I saw her on Dave Letterman trying to explain away the 72 day marriage of her ho of a sister and I found out that nope she is just as bad. Bitch tried to say that Kim had to have really “loved” Kris Humphries” because why else would she marry a “nobody”. I guess that she forgot that until her sister was peed on and her mother edited and released that for the world to see that she too was a NOBODY. Still is in my book. As far as I can see the only good Kardashian is Robert and he’s dead. None of these fame whores has much to brag about in my opinion.

    • HappyMom says:

      He was married multiple times and chose to have children with that trashy Kris Jenner. He was good friend with, and represented, OJ. I don’t want to speak ill of the dead (and he seems like he was a great dad) but I don’t think he was exactly a paragon of virtues either.

      • Sallybee says:

        Agreed. Robert K. represented a wife beating, stalking murderer. How good of a person can you be? And this is not simply the case of an attorney doing his job. Nicole B. Simpson and OJ were close friends of the K’s. I can’t help but think about my husband slashing my throat to the point of near decapitation and then having my best friend’s husband defend my killer in court! These people are all repulsive, disgusting, and have no sense of what the difference between right and wrong is.

  32. Val says:

    Whatevs,Kourtney appears to be a very loving mother. Scott loves his kids.

  33. jwoolman says:

    What I remember is that they already settled Scott was the the father, I had assumed by a paternity test. Can they do that during the pregnancy? I remember there were two possibilities, but the other one was a drunken one-night stand with someone she was embarrassed about (maybe a friend of her brother?) and doesn’t sound like what this guy is claiming. Kourtney said she even briefly considered abortion, she didn’t think she was ready for a baby, maybe especially as a single parent (the memory is dim). She got back together with Scott, but don’t know the timeline. Or was that all just part of the script? It’s so hard to know with those people. I’m still not even sure if Kim is really pregnant…

  34. Lulu.T.O. says:

    Why does Kourtney insist on having children with Disick (the s is silent)?

    Supposedly if a woman had a good role model as a father, they have a better pecker picker than she does.

  35. Mary says:

    So I’ve seen a few episodes of keeping up with the kardashians. And a serious question is, how is Scott a douche to Kourtney? It always seemed like the other way around to me. She always acts like such a bi**h to him. She seems to demand to know where he is every second of the day, he’s not allowed to hang out with frends, whereas she just does whatever the heck she wants and doesn’t care what he says. She treats him like he’s her kid, instead of her boyfriend. Just my observaion.

  36. KellyinSeattle says:

    Please; it’s not as if they can’t get a simple DNA test…if not for themselves, for the kid.

  37. Stoner says:

    “Premo Stallone” sounds like a strain of ganja.

    And really, how in the actual f**k do you misspell “primo”?

  38. madla says:

    I have to admit that i like her, kourtney kardashian that is. i feel a bit guilty about it though.
    i think kourtney and khloe are 1000 times more entertaining than kim. and i like how kourtney is concentraiting on the kids and not on the pounds she gained. and kim, if she talks about the baby, she always speaks of IT. and about being sexy and sexy and feminine, and about the body, baby bump… so strange.

  39. pfeiffer87 says:

    Wow I posted on this wall earlier criticising the writer, someone replied to it and now it’s been deleted. I guess censorship is still alive in the good ole USA.

  40. la chica says:

    I wonder how much Pimp Mama Kris paid Premio to re-activate this non-story in order to make The Slow One (thanks MK!) seem more interesting?

  41. lisa says:

    i really dont see anything but kardashian in the kid but i dont see scott not caring that it wasnt his. i think he would have had a paternity test.

  42. gazette says:

    I must be missing something. I like Scott. I watch the show….I’ve never thought of Scott as being douchie to Kourtney. Just the opposite, I think she’s a giant bitch to him.

    I don’t see anything but Kardashian in Mason. In today’s world of mixed families, it doesn’t matter who is biological. It’s who raises you that is family.

  43. Mew says:

    Whenever I see Scott, I think of Patrick Bateman. It’s just instant. “I have to return some videotapes” and there we go again..

  44. SydneySpy says:

    Yeah. Just a bunch of slags, really. All of them. Isn’t there a couple of even younger ones, too? Watch this space…

  45. Ellie says:

    Of course,Scott is the father.. Mason look just like him.I seriously don’t think Kourtney is the sleeping around-kinda-girl
    .I like Kourtney and I think Scott has the most amazing wit. Good luck to them,I say!
    Kourtney and Khloe make the show.

  46. jes_sayin says:

    Even these fake (Kardashian) stories are SO BORING.

  47. PrincessRi says:

    I always thought the model looked like mason, she slept with him kourtney and her brothers friend that makes 3 and penelope and mason look nothing alike kourt was dreading this day thats why she wants to make it seem like shes an angel and b a surrogate to khloe how scandelous.