Jennifer Aniston shows off her bob haircut, engagement ring in LA: improved?


Jennifer Aniston is super-busy, you guys. She’s busy with endless hair appointments and spa treatments! These are new pics of Jennifer going into a spa on Friday. The spa? Mila Moursi Skin Care Institute in West Hollywood. These photos have everything you need for your Aniston fan-fiction: the quartz-looking engagement ring, the new bob hair style, the hint of Cheshire-cat smile (why is she smiling?!) and a bulky sweater jacket which will fuel another round of endless pregnancy rumors.

What should we tackle first? Let’s do hair. Her hair looks much better in these photos than in the first photos immediately following her hair catastrophe. I really do wonder if that formaldehyde “Brazilian” hair treatment might have burned off a lot of her hair, but here we can see that it looks reasonably healthy. Kind of thin. Hm. I’ve come around to the idea that Jennifer, like Duchess Kate, has always worn a lot of hair pieces, but I’ve always believed that if Jennifer stopped messing with her hair, she would have naturally curly/wavy, thick hair. Which is awesome. Why does she hate her natural hair so much?!

As for the ring and the bulky sweater… well, obviously, it’s an invitation to Bump Watch her for the twenty-bajillionth time, and obviously she wants us to know that the engagement is still very much on. Good. I don’t have the strength to withstand another breakup, pity party and YEARS of Jennifer doing rent-a-dates with B-list models and C-list actors. Please, Jesus, let Justin be The One. PLEASE.




Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

162 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston shows off her bob haircut, engagement ring in LA: improved?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. GByeGirl says:

    I think that she does photos where she looks a little pregnant-ish on purpose to troll people and/or get attention.

  2. springingforward says:

    They are so dunzo. It is only a matter of time and how many photo ops they can squeeze in before they tell the rest of the world….

  3. Apsutter says:

    Her hair used to be really thick during the early years of Friends before she started straightening it and processing the hell out of it everyday

  4. Gossy says:

    I’m surprised nobody has pointed out that she has stopped tanning (or spray tanning since she claimed in 2011 to have stopped actual tanning)…her skin tone is many shades lighter.

  5. PHD Gossip says:

    She is so wearing a Wiglet/fall halfway back.

  6. DiamondGirl says:

    People are working there – why wouldn’t she smile at them?

    I think it’s odd to refer to her ring as quartz-looking. Amethyst, for example, is quartz and is quite shiny. A rose-cut diamond is not meant to look like the average diamond. It’s unique nowadays but is a vintage style that was used a lot years ago.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I think it’s too big. There’s a way to do big rings, and if what you say is true about the stone–it doesn’t work. To me, that ring looks like someone found the biggest diamond they could, polished and cut it up a little, and then plopped it on the first gold band they could find. If it had been half that size, I would’ve loved the ring—but it just looks so cheap to me.

      And I still can’t believe that during those 2-3 months that Jennifer went around hiding her engagement ring hand, after she announced her engagement, that we got a bunch of bs tabloid stories that the ring was small and understated. I did a double take when I saw it for the first time.

    • LeLe25 says:

      I love the ring and think it looks beautiful. I was getting so sick of super shiny diamonds with platinum bands, so I welcome this new trend. Different strokes I guess.

  7. lisa2 says:

    I don’t think those pictures of her when she got her hair done were an accident. I mean she did interviews about it. I think that it is all about product promotion. See how my hair guy used that hair stuff I promote to make my hair look great.

    ** Now I wait for more substantial news.. other than a hair cut.

  8. Virgilia Coriolanus says:

    Her hair does look a lot healthier and softer than it usually does. It always looks so brittle when she’s on the red carpets and things–maybe it’s hairspray?? But I’m amazed that she pays someone to do her hair—it doesn’t look like anything special. See I don’t get why she even cares that her hair is wavy/curly at this point–with her money, I would pay someone to comb my hair for me every single day.

    And we’ll see, about her and Justin. I have a hard time figuring out her playbook, since a lot of it revolves around “any publicity is good publicity”. But I do think they’re done, and have been done for a while, otherwise Huvane wouldn’t have been pushing the wedding so hard (Jennifer “conquered” the Oscars, apparently by showing up????), Jennifer wouldn’t be acting so clueless about the crap that her publicist puts out there–remember when she gave that interview a little bit after she had that second People cover out, saying that she was putting her wedding off. How she got snippy and said that her wedding wasn’t being cancelled or postponed–basically this was always the game plan. I was confused. Why? Her publicist put it out there.

    It’s not like this is some crummy, phone tapping tabloid–it’s PEOPLE. They will literally print the sky is purple, as long as you pay them to. So what is it? I think something went down between those two PEOPLE covers, and Huvane is spinning it for as long as he can. Which, if he had left it alone, then I wouldn’t at all be asking when these two are getting married with any cynicism in me at all.

    • Sienna says:

      I think Jennifer and Huvane have told so many lies and played the media for years that they have lost track of what they said and when they said it. Especially this year the media and the public is going down on Jennifer hard and Jennifer is trying to make sure she doesn’t lose the rest of her small fanbase.

      • Apsutter says:

        I don’t like her but I wouldn’t call her fanbase “small.” Every idiot girl I know that loves romcoms love her and thinks she so great. They usually don’t bother to read legit gossip blogs and tend to only read People because they think it’s a credible source so they think the sun shines out of her *ss.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Asputter, I wouldn’t call it small either. What Jennifer does, she’s very good at–being the generally inoffensive, cute, perky girl in her films. I think she is a lazy actress who *could* do a lot better (as evidenced by Friends with Money, Marley&Me, and The Good Girl), but doesn’t want to. But I do think that her fanbase lost a lot of rational fans, so to speak. I know I keep saying it, but I’ll say it again. I came onto this site in 2010. On this site, despite the writers being fair to both “sides” i.e. Jennifer, Brad, and Angelina–the commentators were a different story. Every single post of Angelina’s, there was always some kind of comment about how she was a homewrecking skank. And I’m not even kidding. Part of the reason why I thought Brad and Angelina cheated–it was an accepted fact around here, for the most part. A few people argued, here and there, but generally, it was accepted as fact.

        But then the shit with Justin came out–how Jennifer was going around, introducing him to people as her boyfriend while he was still with Heidi–I found an article that she introduced him to the other directors on the set of “Five” (her lifetime movie), as her boyfriend–”Five” PREMIERED April 20th, 2011. Heidi and Justin weren’t done, publicly, until June 2011. And people started bringing up a lot of other stuff that she’s done–and that changed the way I thought of her. And I’m sure it changed the way other people on this site thought of her too, because a lot of the old names that I saw, don’t post on here anymore.

        So I think she did lose a lot of goodwill from just the spectators–plus she alienated Vogue, VF, etc. The UK Vogue editor said that she wouldn’t ever be on any one of their covers again, because she wants copy approval of everything–meaning she wants to control what goes into the article, how it’s arranged, the cover–which means she shouldn’t have been outraged about Vogue “going tabloid”, when they put the “uncool” remark on the cover. She only said that because she got backlash–probably because she was praising Brad to the high heavens, saying how proud she was of him and his accomplishments, and his work, saying there was no bad blood between them–while crapping all over Angelina.

      • The Original G says:

        While I think she may have a broader fan base as a tabloid figure, as an actress, she’s got practically no box-office. As she ages out of rom-coms she’s got zero relevance except as gossip fodder….and even THAT seems to waning. Everyone has kind of moved on from the triangle of doom except the craziest of Brangelina’s detractors.

        I don’t think a JustJen split will resurrect interest either. She needs a major coup of a role and a incredible performance to do that. She doesn’t have the chops for that.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @The Original G
        I’m with you–I do think that Huvane WILL try to make it all about Brad, either way the relationship goes. If they break up, Justin will be the guy who almost treated her as bad as Brad did, OR he’ll be the guy who treated her better than Brad. I will place bets on that. That’s the way Huvane rolls. He IS the one who let that idiotic “Five Years After Brad!” cover go through–I was in 8th grade when that came out, and I remember discussing it with one of my teachers afterwards. Even then, I thought it was incredibly sad that a FORTY ONE YEAR OLD WOMAN had to have an article like that–take that Brad! Looking sexy is the best revenge! SERIOUSLY?

        But the only reason I’m still interested in the Holy Triangle of Doom is because of Jennifer, ironically. Because after everything went down with Heidi and Justin, I did “research” of my own, and I really do think that Jennifer “hates” (might be too strong a word) Angelina. I do. Because when she was asked about him, about their divorce, she goes out of her way to say that she’s proud of him, his work, his CHILDREN (with Angelina, for God’s sake), but when it comes to Angelina there’s an issue. A big issue. An issue that isn’t there with Brad. And I think that that’s so dumb and immature to transfer all of your anger towards someone who didn’t do anything to you.

        I think that’s why the tabloids are (were) so focused on her and Angelina–not just because it’s a sexist thing, that their buyers only buy tabloids with women acting bitchy–but because Jennifer has a real issue with Angelina, and Huvane uses that. My thoughts, anyway.

      • Holly says:

        @VG re: Aniston wanting copy approval for Vogue –

        “When Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt negotiated with People and other celebrity magazines this summer for photos of their newborn twins and an interview, the stars were seeking more than the estimated $14 million they received from the deal. They also wanted a hefty slice of journalistic input — a promise that the winning magazine’s coverage would be positive, not merely in that instance but into the future.”

        “she dictates terms to celebrity magazines involving their coverage of her and her family, editors say, creating an awkward situation for publications that try to abide by strict journalistic standards.”

        From the New York Times Article “Angelina Jolie’s Carefully Orchestrated Image” – it’s a great read:

      • Monkey Towz says:

        I tried to watch The Break-up a few years ago & couldn’t get thru it (and this was after a few cocktails). She always plays Rachel Green. Always. I get her mass, vanilla, middle-America appeal but with these constant manipulations & Chelseabeast friendship, I don’t see her staying power.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        What’s your point? In the article, it says specifically for the coverage of the twins birth, they wanted control over the content of the interview i.e. they wanted it to be about their family, no hard hitting questions, and they wanted to showcase their charity work. For a baby issue of PEOPLE. Everyone does that. And that’s assuming PEOPLE wasn’t lying when they said that it wasn’t true–which I don’t understand why they would issue a denial of a story trying to make Angelina look like a control freak. It’s no skin off their back–why would Angelina care that they didn’t defend her.
        The other “issue” was when her lawyer was getting journalists to sign papers saying they couldn’t run the interviews, basically, in a tabloid–take out phrases here or there. And the matter was resolved–whether it actually was her being in control of her image, or her lawyer was the one doing it without her knowledge.

        My point with Jennifer is that she wanted copy approval from MAJOR publications. I don’t see PEOPLE as a major publication–they’re ass kissers. They bend over backwards for everyone, especially when they can make some real cash. And she apparently did get copy approval. My point was that she couldn’t complain that Vogue went tabloid on her. She knew exactly what was going on. Nowhere in that article does it say that Angelina tells major publications to let her see everything i.e Vogue, Vanity Fair—which is probably why she’s had a cover at least once every two years since she started out. So what’s your point?

        And also–I think she’s pretty smart to be able to handle her own press, instead of paying someone for that. I noticed that with all of her PEOPLE articles, they always have a section that shows how you can adopt internationally, or features a link to some organization that she is affiliated with.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        And lastly holly, I find it ironic that out of everything I said in my post, you chose one throwaway sentence (compared to the rest of the post) to snark on. And when’s the last time Jennifer had a Vogue cover? 2008. A VF cover? 2005. So who do you think alienated who? Obviously the magazines don’t think that Angelina isn’t that big of a control freak (which I hear that she’s actually very easy to interview–doesn’t really set a limit on questions, except for that 2005-6 period where every other question out of a journalist’s mouth was “What do you think of Jennifer Aniston?”), otherwise she wouldn’t be getting covers.

      • Sal says:

        Holly you are so desperate that its sad. That NYT article is not even used by Aniston fans anymore, because the article was SO THOUGHLY DISCREDITED, by the Editor of the paper. NO ONE refers to it any more unless they want to make a fool of themselves and expose themselves to ridicule. Do catch up.

      • Holly says:

        Oh Sal, you always make me laugh! I won’t argue with you anymore. You’re clearly insane.

      • Sal says:

        Really Holly (or is it blonde on the dock or spinner?), look it up, the article was thoroughly discredited. You are the insane one. You truly are a pathetic and nasty piece of work. I feel sorry for you for what happened in your life to make you so spiteful and nasty. You need help.

  9. Kiddo says:

    The bob is fine, but I hate those pants.

  10. janie says:

    I wish this chick would go away.. She is no longer relevant. Who cares about the haircut or makeup? What reputable actor give an interview about their hair? Seriously? She can’t act, she’s getting older… Go away!

  11. Sal says:

    Its hard to tell, it looks like she could have her hair tucked into her collar/jacket so theres no way to tell how long or short it is. As for the engagement ring, that means nothing I wouldn’t put it past her to still wear it even if they’ve broken the engagement. Remember that time she walked in the front door of the pap HQ The Ivy and straight out the back, with a big grin and smirk on her face, a tight top with no bra, prominent iced nipples and a big diamond ring on her wedding finger, when she was with Vince Vaughn? He broke up with he after those photos surfaced. She is so manipulative and such a famewhore I wouldn’t put it past her if they were broken up but she still wears the ring for attention.

    • Jackson says:

      LOL, what??? How did I not hear about that? Yeah, it sounds about right though.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Sal might be confusing another story, or that might be a different one entirely. The one I read–which is covered on this site (I’ll put up a link) happened in 2006, while promoting “The Breakup”.

        Jennifer came into the premiere with a canary yellow diamond ring on her engagement ring finger, with a huge grin on her face. The reporter asked her if she was engaged (to Vince Vaughn–I can’t remember if they were still pretending that they weren’t dating or not), and she acted coy and said something like “It’s a gorgeous ring, isn’t it?”–didn’t answer the question.

        But a few minutes later, this same interviewer gets a chance to talk with Vince Vaughn–told him about the ring, and told him that she had asked Jennifer if it was an engagement ring. The reporter said that Vaughn got P I S S E D, basically told her to go talk to their publicists, marched off to where Jennifer was, pulled her into a corner, and they (he) had a heated discussion–after which she switched the ring onto her other finger

        Here it is:

    • The Original G says:

      Well, she bought it. Why shouldn’t she wear it?

      Really, I hope it works out for her.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @The Original G, who wrote: “Really, I hope it works out for her.”

        Truthfully? I do too. I ‘really’ hope she’s so smug above because she and her tiny man have planned a Christmas Eve wedding, with all the trimmings. I would be happier than all of her Jen-Hens if this happened.

        Having said that … makeovers like hers (she even dressed the ears she hates so she can show them off), usually happen after a breakup. Or in Jen’s case, when news of the breakup finally hits the fan.

        What’s interesting to me is the fact that her PR puppet master hasn’t denied the rumors this weekend that Jen and Justin aren’t a couple any longer. He didn’t even counter the speculation that Justin was smooching another woman at Robert Downey Jr.’s party last weekend. Will simply having Jen show up for one of her habitual Spa Days with the ring on her finger and ‘baby bump speculator’ sweater in place really squash those rumors?

        We shall see … as we ‘still’ continue to discuss her ‘me, Me, ME!’ butt.

      • Bea says:

        Emma – thanks for the link.

        Funny how 7 years later she is still playing on an engagement and baby rumor. Well maybe not funny – just pathetic.

      • lisa2 says:

        No denial.. but I think someone said they put out a story of them having a romantic dinner together. So in love. so maybe that was the denial.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Just like how Jennifer “denied” getting with Justin, when the rumors first started up. If I remember right, it was all “There were other people at the dinner.” NOT “We are not dating”.

  12. Pam246 says:

    I know Jennifer is all about her hair but it seems weird she’s getting so much attention for it. It’s not as if she cut her hair. She just took out her extensions and maybe cut an inch. I also believe that this is a publicity stunt. Who gives a bunch of interviews about their hair? I know she a spokesperson for a hair care product but it wasn’t mentioned. Then she gets photographed with her hair looking a mess and looking better a couple of days later.

  13. Greata says:

    She is obviously trying to play down the recent rash of break up stories.

  14. hannah says:

    Am I the only one who thinks her new ear piercing doesn’t suit her all? It seems curiously out of character.

  15. Bea says:

    How very Jen of her to appear yesterday. Because those paps just happen to be hanging out at that particular spa yesterday. I’m sure it was just a coincidence, especially with what was happening last night.

    Cue the next story from her pr people about how Jen and Justin sit right next to each other instead of across from each other during dinner because they are so in love.

    My kids sit next to each other wheh they could sit across from each other, but they do it so they can annoy each other.

  16. bettyrose says:

    We’re having a sudden cold spell down here in soCal, so that sweater makes total sense. I actually like that whole look, even the wedge booties which aren’t typically my thing. If I could afford a spa life, I’d be all about it. But she loses me at the neverending romance and/or baby drama. It’s called dignity. Find it.

  17. GIRLFACE says:

    I have never once seen a pic of Jen and Justin and thought to myself “wow they look believable/comfortable/happy/dynamically in love.” Jen always seems desperate, IMO.

  18. Sullivan says:

    She’s not orange. They probably asked her to lay off the spray tan before she came in for her treatments.

  19. Sienna says:

    I don’t understand why she has been frying, bleaching and straitening her hair for the past decade or so when her natural hair is much better. She is half Greek and half Italian and she had amazingly thick and wavy hair that many people would kill to have and yet here is Jennifer doing everything she can to not only to damage it but also rejects her heritage. Everything about Jennifer is false – her hair is bleached, she wore extensions for years while claiming it was her real hair, had 3 nose-jobs, wears color contact lenses, uses spray tans, gets botox, laser treatments and fillings etc.

    More over – isn’t it a breach of contract and falsifying statements when Jennifer claimed that her Living Proof gave her this amazing frizz free hair but instead did a Brazilian hair treatment for tackling the same frizz? Same with her Aveeno commercials where she claims to have used Aveeno for years and that is the reason for her good skin but instead she gets pictured going to spas and beauty treatments weekly?

    As for her pregnancy rumour pr games – most people have figured out her game and now thinks she is pathetic for still playing those games. Even her hardcore fans have started to realise that Jennifer has never wanted children and only played the media and her fans to get sympathy and not lose her caravan mum’s fan club. And dont give me the BS about her having miscarriages etc because Jennifer herself admitted to never having been pregnant let alone suffering miscarriages.

    I would have had more respect for Jennifer if she actually admitted to never wanting children like other women. But then again this is Jennifer and she is a master manipulator who has told so many lies over the years that it will take me hours to write it all down and provide the links as well.

    PS: Frankly I don’t care one way or other if Justin and Jennifer are finished. It is a win-win for Jennifer either way because she has already planted the seeds against Justin with articles about him not wanting to move to LA, not ready to get married soon etc and recently that picture of him kissing another woman. If Justin did cheat/will cheat in the future – well I wont have any sympathy for Jennifer either. What goes around comes around and Jennifer is a triple home wrecker who wrecked other women’s relationship and didn’t give a damn about their feelings so why should another woman then care about Jennifer’s?

    • Holly says:

      She’s rejecting her heritage by getting hair treatments? That’s reaching pretty far…..

      • bettyrose says:

        Actually, it’s right on target. Curly hair is often associated with ethnic groups whose physical characteristics are not as glamorized in the entertainment/fashion industries (remember in the Princess Diaries when she had to straighten her hair to be more princess-like?) I wear my curls proudly, but on the rare occasion when someone asks why I don’t straighten, they get an earful from me.

      • lunchcoma says:

        bettyrose – I agree that this does intersect with ethnicity, but I’m disinclined to put most of the blame on women who’ve spent their whole lives being made to feel bad about their natural looks. I’m more inclined to blame stylists and photographers who have spent decades presenting us with a uniform look, and to praise women who are willing to buck convention.

    • Ginger says:

      If she were to lie about having miscarriages… as someone who has suffered through two of them…I would have to stop watching her films/shows period. Forever.

    • Sloane Wyatt says:

      Give me a break! By your standards, Angelina Jolie also “rejects” both her parents’ ethnic heritage of Slovak & German on her father’s side and French-Canadian, Dutch, German, Bohemian (Czech), remote Huron Native Canadian, and French-Swiss on her mother’s.

      Moreover, Angie doesn’t wear St. John and Louis Vuitton 24-7, but no one gives a fig that she gets pictured wearing other designers all the time instead.

      As for her pregnancy rumor PR games – who cares? Maybe the sheer number of ways the tabloids have sold their Jennifer Anniston baby rumors over the years has you confused that SHE has coyly intimated she’s carrying a child. Photo assumptions are one thing, but has Jen ever verbally hinted she’s pregnant? Again, who cares that Jen has at various times said she’s ready to have, trying to have, or wants to have, children? Last time I checked, women are allowed to be ambivalent about having children.

      We do, however, have Jen on record introducing Justin as her boyfriend, well before he and Heidi broke up, so I agree with the last bit of your post calling Jen a cheater. Sienna, you make a very good point that “what goes around comes around”, but can you explain how Aniston is a “triple home wrecker”?

      Ginger, I don’t believe Jen herself has lied about any miscarriages. To the best of my knowledge, it was a guy trying to sell a few books who wrote those rumors.

      Phew! Now that’s off my chest.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I don’t know about the “triple homewrecker” thing–I heard that Tate Donovan (her first fiancee) was engaged to someone else–don’t know if that’s true or not.

        And Jennifer has never said anything about having been pregnant or having had miscarriages–that’s just some tabloid bs from years ago. The rumors I heard was that she took steroids or hormones or something that made her skinny–and she miscarried. It’s just some crap that the tabloids made up when she and Brad were still married.

      • Candy says:

        Theirs big difference between St. John /Louis Vuitton and Aveeno/Living Proof one is a clothing and the other is hair and face products. If your calming that your your hair/face products made your hair look a certain way then go and do other things to make you hair and skin look better is hypocritical. It’s not just Jen but celebrities as well who indorse hair and Skin care products.

        Why are you bring AJ in to this

      • Sienna says:

        @Sloane Wyatt: I dont know why you bought Angelina into this but since you have done it – I will reply. As you yourself wrote Angelina has too many heritage behind her to be able to choose from. As far as I know her mum is part French and Angelina has a house in France and has learned to speak French alongside her children.

        As for Jennifer – I am sorry but Jennifer has never proudly said that she is Greek/Italian (as far as I know). I remember her saying once that she hated her Greek gens and that is why she colors her hair blonde.

        Now for the St.John and Angelina – the rules are different when it comes to advertising for clothing, bags etc. Angelina since joining with LW has always carried a bag of theirs.

        When it comes to cosmetic and hair – its a whole new ball game. I remember one of the L’Oreal women were caught buying a different brand of eye makeup while still advertising for L’Oreal. That was breach of contract. Same with hair – Chery Cole got into trouble for advertising for shampoo for L’Oreal while still wearing extensions for the commercial and claim the thickness was due to the shampoo.

        Jennifer is doing the same thing – she claimed her flawless skin is due to using Aveeno for years and yet she gets botox, laser treatments, facials etc. Same with her Living Proof where she claimed that these products tamed her frizzy hair while now has been caught trying to tame the same frizzy hair with Brazilian hair treatment.

        Lastly for the triple homewrecker comment – Jennifer cheated with Tate Donovan who was engaged to another woman (that woman also miscarried due to the stress caused by Jen’s affair with Tate). Secondly Jen cheated with a formed close friend Jo Gartin’s husband Chris (he is also a father of Jo’s
        2 children). And recently Jennifer cheated with Justin for almost a year behind his then girlfriend of 14 years. All of these cheating are not rumors because they were confirmed by the people involved in this. Tate affair was confirmed by Tate himself while Chris’s and Justin’s affairs were confirmed by the exes parents and even Justin close friend.

      • Sloane W!yatt says:

        Thanks, Sienna and Candy for your replies. I brought Angie into it to illustrate the vitriol associated with either of these two female corners of the Uncool Triangle. I’m not a loonie or a hen, but I’m always bemused at the equally strong reactions they both evoke.

        The pregnancy thing, I confess, did get on my nerves though!

      • Sal says:

        I forgot about Chris Gartin. I remember seeing a pap photo of a car carrying Chris and Jennifer hurrying away and Aniston was covering her eyes to try and stop from being recognised, but her and Chris were very very close together in the back seat. It was obvious she was fucking him. I didn’t hear about Tate’s engagement (I thought it was Sandra Bullock he cheated on Aniston with?) and the miscarriage. No surprise. Aniston is scum who doesn’t care who she hurts. She doesn’t have a decent bone in her body. You have to wonder what type of person would be a fan of her knowing she is a complete piece of garbage. Someone with no moral compass? She makes Paris Hilton look good. I don’t think Paris has homewrecked 3 times and caused an innocent woman to miscarry.

  20. Jaded says:

    Justin is a good pal of Terry Richardson’s and for that I can’t fathom why Jennifer is with him. She MUST know what Terry’s extra-curricular activities are all about, and Justin must have been involved in some of his more lurid shenanigans before he hooked up with her. The whole thing smells of sleaze and desperation.

    • Sienna says:

      Jennifer is BFF with Chelsea Handler – a woman who not only had an abortion but also laughed about it. A woman who is not only a racist but is also pathetic enough to attack children. A woman who doesn’t give anything to charity but has the audacity to attack anyone else who does and calls them fake.

      Jennifer is also close friends with Joe Francis – a women beater who has been jailed for abusing women.

      Jennifer wouldn’t give a shit about Justin being BFF with a pedo like Terry. Obviously she agrees with the friendship because she also hangs out with Terry. Same with Justin agrees with Chelsea being Jennifer’s friend.

      What I find interesting is the fact that Jennifer is not close friends with her old friends anymore – Courteney Cox, Andrea W, Jo Gartin (who’s husband Jen cheated with) etc.

  21. Layla says:

    Wondering if there will ever be a day when she has something else in her life for people to be interested in besides her hair!
    Hair this, yoga that, Mexico this, hair again.

    She is almost 45 and her hair is the thing most talked about. Pretty sad.
    Without her hair, would she have anything in her life to talk about?

    • bluhare says:

      If my memory serves, didn’t she do something to her face the last two drastic haircuts?

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I know that she at least did something around 2011/early 2012, because her mouth area started looking really weird, and her entire face just looked pinched, tight, and ROUGH. I remember making a comment that her face was looking weird and plasticky–like she did something to her mouth area.

        If I remember right, this was right around the time Justin/Jennifer got together, because she was still trying to front like she was an NY girl. Either that or when her mom had a stroke or something….

    • arabella says:

      LOL! Right on. She’s sad and needs to find something more meaningful to be involved in.

    • TC says:

      “Wondering if there will ever be a day when she has something else in her life for people to be interested in besides her hair!”

      I don’t think so. Her hair, diet and exercise have become her most relevant topics of conversation because her film career hasn’t managed to move her beyond the rom-com ensemble label of the mid-90s. She’s still making the same films she was making 15-20 years ago when she was on Friends. She’s never been able to open a film on her name alone, so she’ll never get scripts for those films that have “award potential.” Her acting range is limited to Rachel Green-isms, and that keeps her squarely in middling comedies.

      So her hair, diet and exercise have now become the main topic of conversation. And she appears to know this since she’s actively participating in the promotion of these conversations, whether it be conflicting reports (from her own lips) about her hair drama or photos of her new haircut on Instagram.

      Maybe she’s accepted that that’s the best she can do. Let’s face it, she’ll never have an Oscar on her shelf. So the product endorsements (Aveeno, Living Proof, Smart Water) are her consolation prize.

      • epiphany says:

        Aniston is a superficial, self-involved person. She expects, and wants, everything to be about her. No, she’s not evil, she’s not a super b*tch; I’m sure she can be very friendly and cordial. However, everything that matters to her is on the surface. She is not the kind of woman who wants to delve deeply into the aspirations, motivations and drives of another person – or her own, for that matter. Brad Pitt was obviously yearning for someone who did. My hunch is, while Justin is enjoying the obvious perks of being Aniston’s BF, he has – or soon will – get the same itch to find a woman who can think and converse on a more profound level than Jen.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        As an aside, have you actually tasted SmartWater? My mom bought it once, because that was the only thing they had–I’ve never drank water that was so flat. It was weird. It was like it had no taste at all.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        epiphany–that’s how I think of her too. I don’t see her as some evil person, but rather selfish, if it doesn’t involve her. A big reason I think this is because of Courtney. After Jennifer got her divorce, she, Courtney, and David practically were glued to each other. Jennifer was always with them. ALWAYS. But the minute Courtney started going through her own divorce, where was Jennifer? Not out and about with Courtney, that’s for sure. She was already besties with Chelsea Handler, if I remember right.

        I have an aunt like that. She lives 15 minutes away from me (and that’s being generous), and whenever she calls our house, I know it’s because she wants something. She wants me to babysit, or she needs to borrow our truck. If me or my siblings spent the night, it wasn’t because she said to us “hey, we rented a few movies, let’s get some pizza and watch movies”–it’s because WE asked. The only time I’ve ever been invited over, is when she wants me to babysit. The only time we ever see her is during holidays, or when she wants something.

        So I feel like with Jennifer, as long as everyone’s having fun, things are going good, then you are BFFS for life! But if she has to step out of her comfort zone, then she is G O N E. I have only one friend from school–she told me once that I was her only real friend because I was the only person who actually talked to her outside of school and didn’t ask her for stuff.

      • Sloane Wyatt says:

        Virgilia Coriolanus, I agree it sure looks like Jennifer was nowhere to be found when her BFF Courtney was going through her own divorce, but I think that had more to do with Courtney breaking the girl code. After Jen hooked up with and then dumped by Cougar Town’s Josh Hopkins, Courtney started a torrid affair with her co-star. Ouch!

        Uhm, when you wrote “I have only one friend from school”, do you mean that YOU are your HS buddy’s only friend?

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I never understood girl code–maybe it’s because I’ve never been in a relationship, but if I’m done with someone, I don’t care who they date. Even if it’s my friend. As long as there wasn’t anything going on, before we broke up, who would care. And from the way the article described it, if I were her, I’d be telling Courtney to HAVE HIM. I didn’t remember that he was the dude who called her a sport f*ck….
        I don’t know–just from this article, I don’t think that’s why Courtney and Jennifer stopped being besties. BUT she’d already dated John Mayer at this point, so maybe she likes douches.

        But I also remember this thing that Courtney said–something like she was tired of being David’s mother, and solving all of her friends problems, instead of focusing on her own. So I do think that Courtney cut the cord. Maybe she slept with this guy, to cut it faster–who knows?

        From what my friend said to me–it’s not that she doesn’t have plenty of people who talk to her DURING school (like me), but it’s just that, if they’re outside of school, then they don’t ever talk to her unless they want something. Those were her exact words. I’m a pretty introverted person–so I really only need one friend. I’m not too interested in going out, going to parties or anything like that–so I’m fine w/my one friend. I only really talk to her and one of my teachers (we email), other than that, it’s family.

      • Sloane W!yatt says:

        Oh, OK, Virgilia. My DH is an introvert too, but I get to have his gleefully mischievous inner child and his mysteriously debonair man all to myself! Introverts rock!

  22. Lucky Charm says:

    Nevermind this shallow woman who feels she needs to do a promo tour for a haircut. Where is the post on the Oscar award that Angelina Jolie received last night?!

  23. Renee says:

    I saw 12 Years a Slave last night and when the credit for Plan B productions flashed across the screen I was reminded that the company was once jointly owned by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Anniston. And I tried to imagine her ever being attached to something of the same weight or magnitude as that film and I think that my brain shut down. Even World War Z, not that that was a great film but given the fact that Brad P stuck with it and committed says something about his character. The thought of her doing anything besides shopping, tanning, drinking, smoking and going to Mexico is near impossible and I could see why their marriage wouldn’t have made the distance, with or without the introduction of la Jolie. I am not saying that she deserved to have her marriage fail, but it seems that they are very different people who ultimately don’t seem to have a lot in common.

    • TC says:

      In reality Renee, Aniston was what’s called an equity partner in Plan B Entertainment. While she was considered part-owner in the business and entitled to a share in the company profits, she did not have any underlying ownership interest in the business or share in the distributions of the partnership (hence the reason Brad got Plan B outright in the divorce). Plan B Entertainment was really Brad Pitt and Brad Grey’s baby. Aniston was really just along for the ride.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      That’s what I don’t get about her. Because she has TONS of money. She has said publicly that she wants to make films that empower women. She has her own production company. She could make one film a year, for under ten million (or whatever it is the cheap indies spend), make a film about something that matters to her–and soon enough, if she worked at it hard enough, she could be a powerhouse, in the producing field. And I would say good for her–I’m glad that she’s breaking into part of the industry that women have a hard time getting into. And with her name recognition, it’s not like anyone wouldn’t know that she’s doing the film. At least not 8 years ago….now, maybe not.

      • epiphany says:

        But then she’s said a lot of things that turned out not to be true – or at least weren’t true to how she really felt.

      • Renee says:

        I KNOW!!!!! I am in agreement with you Virginia but what struck me after I read your comment is that the things that it seems that she is interested in are: her hair, her skin, her body, exercising, shopping, going to Mexico to LAY IN THE SUN, drinking, smoking, renovating her ugly homes…

        And I say this as someone who likes shopping, eating, lying down, reading about and purchasing skin care products and LOVES MEXICO (and drinking too) and does not understand how someone could spend all their bloody time there on a lawn chair when the country is AMAZING. But I have other interests in addition to these and she just seems limited in terms of her interests and outlooks. I know that we the public don’t know everything that there is to her its just that she has been in the public eye for aeons now and has shown us her dull and predictable hand time and time again. So I don’t know that she would be able to make compelling films about her interests however maybe she could hire other people who could make interesting films and she could just support them…

      • emmie_a says:

        Renee: I think how you described Jennifer is perfect: She is limited. Her career, her interests, her fashion sense, etc. Which is fine – It has obviously worked for her. But it’s also boring, which is why I’m amazed that she’s still talked about as much as she is.

  24. Jess says:

    I’ve never thought much of Chris Pine, but if that is “the move” fcuk it. I’m in. More guys should be taught to stage kiss.

  25. lenje says:

    I can see I’m about to go against the tide here because I like the bob cut (specifically because it’s not another pixie!), AND I love those boots! Wedge boots are the best!

    *Go back to the Sleepy Hollow board to read the debate about Old English and Middle English*

  26. Maggie says:

    Looks like she just had a manicure. I love her whole ensemble. Very cool!

  27. Cecilia says:

    Love her bag & that sweater. I’m still on the fence about her hair. I want to see a full face on with it. It has been really chilly in So CA the past few days. I can understand the sweater & don’t think she is vying for rumors.

  28. Shiela says:

    I always avoid movies with Jennifer Aniston, because I don’t like her acting style or film choices; however, I think you all go too far in your dislike of her. I like coming to this site to comment on celebs, trends and pop morality, but I am always really turned off by the way this site invents negative stories out of absolutely NOTHING regarding Aniston and then really surprised by the chorus of commenters who are chomping at the bit to take it even further.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      What made up stories are you talking about?

    • Sloane W!yatt says:

      Agreed, Sheila! See my above post. These tired negative puff pieces on Jen are getting kind of old.

      IMO, Jennifer Aniston is fairly inoffensive, other than the cheating with Justin on Heidi Bivens, and I don’t care that she tans, drinks, and vacays. Cue the pearl clutching. I appreciate that at least Jen doesn’t conspicuously consume stratospherically expensive items like $1500 haircuts, gold toilets, or private islands.

      • Erm says:

        I’m actually really growing to appreciate the puff pieces. I agree that Aniston is inoffensive, and if vacuousness is her worst quality, may more people be like Aniston! I remember when the story about Charlie Sheen’s little boys came up and it was so awful that I was grateful that the next story was an Aniston puff piece. Never was I so glad to read about someone’s preoccupation with her hair. Nowadays I also need an Aniston chaser after reading about the hijacking of feminism by Miley Cyrus, Courtney Stodden and the resultant diatribes about slut-shaming (by God, I now despise that term, though I agree with the principle when used ACCURATELY). Vive la Aniston! Or maybe I just need to get off Celebitchy and get a life. ;)

      • Sloane W!yatt says:

        lol, erm! Well, when you put it that way I guess I really do like the lighter than air puff pieces too! I certainly don’t skimp on giving them my full pedantic attention. :)

  29. lucy2 says:

    Cool weather = wearing a sweater. Being engaged = wearing a ring.
    I have no explanation for the jeans and booties.

  30. Sugar says:

    The earring is another attempt for Jen to step out of her control freak bubble & show the world she’s as hip as her NYC skinny jean loving boyfriend aka fiancé.
    Her haircut (attempt to change it up) is most likely from over processing damage. Her hair probably started breaking off in the midst of yet another processing & mortified her as her stylist said well I tried to tell you the last 10 times your hair won’t take any more we have to amputate…

    BTW not even aware of this new look on Jen that same day I had at least 10″ lobbed off & told no one I was mulling it over for some time but I’m sure at work that Monday it drove a few busy body co workers crazy trying to figure out what caused my spur of the moment change up. What sets my hair apart is my hair is extremely healthy Jens always looked like it needed to go. But I’m pretty sure Jens hair will “grow out” before mine.

  31. Ginger says:

    I love the cut. I think it’s flattering. She should stick with it. And the non tanning. I’m assuming she doesn’t have any makeup on here since she’s going in for a spa treatment. Her skin looks good. Why oh why doesn’t she stick with this look? It makes her look younger IMO. But I’m going to agree with the other posters that this whole “Brazilian ruined my hair/I had to cut it all off/Now look how great it is because of my hair products” is all a ruse. She had to have some excuse to cut off her hair since that’s what she’s known for.

  32. Jen34 says:

    She is in her mid 40′s. I think bump watch is over.

    Her hair looks thin but nice. I am currently getting over 3 years of straightening, so I kind of feel for her.

  33. Frenchie says:

    Would she have tried that scary formaldehyde thing if she were pregnant? I don’t know much about it but that sounds like something a pregnant woman shouldn’t do, don’t you think?

  34. lunchcoma says:

    As someone who also has naturally curly hair, I have some sympathy for the straightening. Curls have been out of style for decades, and the only kind you’ll see on the red carpet are the ones that are pressed into straight or straightened hair. Women who try to buck the trend are generally criticized as being messy-looking or unsophisticated. Of course, Aniston could step up and try to reverse the trend, but I don’t really blame her for having internalized negative feelings about her hair.

  35. Jaxx says:

    I think her haircut is cute and very youthful. But, oh please God, don’t let JustJen be over. I really don’t want to go back to the days of what loser Jen is dating this week, why can’t Jen find love etc., etc., ad nauseam. I really can’t.

  36. kellyinseattle says:

    It’d make news if she burped. Pathetic…

  37. themummy says:

    You’re actually serious? If this woman EVER wears ANYTHING baggy she is “inviting” pregnancy speculation? On purpose? So she is only allowed (by the social police) to wear tight clothes at ALL times? It’s almost December–ALL women are wearing sweaters right now, the great majority of them very loose and baggy. Give her a break. I’m not a huge Jen Aniston fan, but ripping her apart for wearing a sweater when it’s almost December seems petty and stupid.

  38. floretta50 says:

    Someone said Jennifer Aniston hair cut is getting more attention than Brangelina award ceremony from last night, this couldn’t be further from the truth, just been on sites from Daily mail to Huff Post to ET, with pictures of Brad, Angie and maddox at the Oscar ceremony, hits are pass the 200 mark some are even up to 500. This is why Aniston has been trolling her hairdo around for the past two weeks, still obsessed with competing with Angelina.

  39. P.J. says:

    Aside from everything else mentioned above, you know what I’ve never understood? Why people in L.A. dress like they’re experiencing a freaking blizzard all the time. I mean, if she’s THAT layered and bulked up for November in Los Angeles, what the hell would she wear here (New England) during an ACTUAL winter??? That’s always bugged me about candid fall & “winter” West Coast pictures of celebs. I just don’t get it…

    • apsutter says:

      It’s exactly the same thing for when southerners come up north during any kind of cool time. I live in Erie PA which gets a ton of snow, is very cold, and has tons of wind coming from the lake. My uncle grew up here but has lived in Orlando for most of his adult life and whenever he comes back up anytime after October we always end up teasing him because he wears SO MANY LAYERS! They’re bodies just aren’t used to frigid days.

  40. lenje says:

    All the rants here regarding Aniston, started by a picture of her new haircut and ring totally remind me of my mother. A casual mention about a missing sock can end up to a lengthy commentary about my love life. Or my sister’s marriage. Or both. Oh well, us women :D .

    (But I’m afraid I’m more and more becoming my mom. Kinda scary but I can’t avoid it :) )

  41. says:

    The haircut makes her more youthful.

  42. someone says:

    Given that I have the exact same haircut and color I’m feeling a little better about myself today lol.

  43. justsayin says:

    You don’t suppose she is wearing a sweater because its chilly out do ya??????????

  44. John Wayne Lives says:

    the bob suits her.. and yes please God let Justin be the one because this woman.. I mean really what’s it going to take for her to just go away and live a real life away from the rest of us..

  45. Sara says:

    Like many other celebs, I think she got her extensions removed again.