Chelsea Handler live-tweeted a bunch of racist crap during the Oscars, surprise

wenn20990287

I saw that many of you were talking about Chelsea Handler in yesterday’s Angelina Jolie post. You do know that every time you mention Chelsea in the same breath as Angelina, that’s a victory for Chelsea right? Surprising no one, Chelsea Handler was not invited to the Oscars, although I bet she could have scored an invitation to the Vanity Fair party if she really wanted to go. She didn’t. Instead, she took a gig with the Huffington Post, where she live-tweeted the Oscars from their HuffPo Twitter handle. As you can imagine, Chelsea was incredibly racist, cracking “jokes” about Sidney Poitier being Nelson Mandela and how Angelina Jolie was going to “adopt” Lupita Nyong’o.

Stay classy, Chelsea. The thing is… this is not shocking whatsoever. Even if you have only a passing interest in Chelsea Handler or you’ve only watched her show a handful of times, you know what she’s all about. She makes racist “jokes” all the time. That’s her shtick. She thinks that being offensive is the same as being funny. If she was sitting on her own Twitter feed and doing this stuff, I would be like, “Yeah, obviously. The sky is blue.” It bugs me that HuffPo invited her to tweet from their feed. That was a horrible call by HuffPo. AND THE TWEETS ARE STILL UP. Which compounds the error in judgment.

wenn20990288

Photos courtesy of WENN.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

153 Responses to “Chelsea Handler live-tweeted a bunch of racist crap during the Oscars, surprise”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. bns says:

    Zzzzzz…

    Don’t give her the attention she desperately craves.

    • idk says:

      I have watched her show numberous times (mostly because I like the comedians she has on…they are much funnier than she is). All she does is show up and give weird faces. I can’t believe how much money she gets paid to do that. I have noticed the show seems to be getting lazier and lazier, they are no longer making a real effort to be creative or incredibly funny.

  2. Amelia says:

    It’s a bit like a petulant toddler trying to get a parent/anyone’s attention.
    Only with added vitriol.
    At least we know she’s desperate.

    • Me43 says:

      Of course she is going all racist on Angelina Jolie..Isn’t she one of Jen’s BFF’s?

      • Eva says:

        yep, a night that was not about Angelina was all about Angelina in her head.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        That’s what I don’t get. I could see bringing up Angelina (if someone WAS going to bring her up like this), if it had been Angelina who was nominated for an Oscar, or was in a film that had been nominated. She wasn’t.

        She was the DATE–the plus one, of someone who was nominated. Who chose a very simple, non-assuming, somewhat matronly (as others have said) gown that needed a belt—to ensure that she didn’t make ANY waves i.e. didn’t want to take focus off the FILM and PEOPLE that were nominated.

        And she didn’t do anything silly like stick out her leg again, etc. All she did was look sufficiently loved up with Brad AND Sidney Poitier (my mom would be so jealous, she’s always said that Sidney Poitier should’ve been my father–she’s a HUGE fan), and present an award.

        So Chelsea–for those who DIDN’T think/know this, comes off as a stalker for making a night about Angelina, when it wasn’t even about her. But I guess SOMEONE’S gotta earn those Break Up Margarita’s and Cabo trip SOMEHOW.

      • sophie says:

        I don’t think she is any more bff with aniston then she is with Bullock, Witherspoon, Theron, and anyone else who has been on her show. The bloids tend to call everyone bffs if they are photographed together. I know they vacationed together in the past but haven’t heard of aniston hanging with her in the past couple of years and I wouldn’t blame aniston if she was distancing herself from Handler since she seems to keep putting her foot in her mouth.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @sophie
        Jennifer was on Chelsea’s show in August 2013–so seven months ago. Sure, it’s entirely possible that they aren’t friends anymore (‘broke up’ in those seven months), but that doesn’t invalidate the crap that Chelsea’s been saying about Angelina for FOUR years–while being besties with Jennifer.

        http://www.celebitchy.com/313668/jennifer_aniston_appears_on_chelsea_lately_talks_chickens_bachelorette_parties/

      • littlestar says:

        Virgilia, I LOVE how Brad and AJ can both say they are Oscar winners… While you know who still desperately clings to her 90s fame (yes, I went there, the triangle of doom…). I bet that made Handler absolutely livid. I’m beginning to think that not only does she viciously attack AJ to suck up to Aniston, but she also attacks her because she’s jealous of her. AJ is everything Handler is not – gracious, selfless, beautiful and kind to everyone she meets (seriously, I don’t recall reading one story where AJ was rude/ignorant to regular folk).

        All of this just makes Handler look like a tool.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @littlestar (can’t you tell how HARD I’m trying to NOT do my work…it’s working so far :)
        I thought Brad would be a lot more emotional–I’m sure what with all the crap he’s gone through with Paramount for the past year, and winning his first Oscar at 50–that’s a lot. I know that if it was ME, I’d be up there crying. Because the minute I even get the tiniest bit emotional, I start crying. So I’d be bawling…..but maybe he got more *excited* in private….

        And here’s the thing–it’s all Jennifer. I do think that. You know those celebrity bios that certain entertainment networks do??? Where they have the comedians talk about them? I’ve seen a lot of those–they’re on youtube–of Brad, Angelina, and various other celebs I’m interested in. Chelsea was in a few of them, and she was talking about how hot Brad was, and on her show, BEFORE she fell into bed with CAA, she talked about how gorgeous Angelina was.

        I shared a link down below with GoodNamesAllTaken–where it details (from CB) how many times Handler has gone off on Angelina. Here’s the thing–Chelsea had her show for TWO years before she started in on Angelina–at the end of those two years she signed onto CAA, and had Jennifer on as her guest for that crappy movie ‘Love Happens’…. that’s when she started in on the ‘Angelina is a homewrecking, non girl’s girl, c-nt’….she had no issues with it in the two years BEFORE she and Jennifer became friends. So why is it an issue now?

        It comes off as creepy–because here’s what most people are missing (when The View was discussing it, they said that it’s not Chelsea’s call)—Chelsea didn’t even know any of the parties when sh-t went down–so why is she so fixated on someone who has NO connection to her–and she also talks about Angelina in PERSONAL interviews–so it’s not just professional either. It comes off as creepy–and it makes Jennifer look pathetic because she’s friends with someone who brings that kind of mess to her door–mess that she says she hates–remember when she said the biggest misconception about her was that they were in some sort of triangle??? Being friends with Chelsea does nothing to disprove that.

        And yes–I agree with you about the Oscars thing….that’s probably why Jennifer and Justin haven’t been seen or heard from since their vacation in December. Which I can see WHY–but still. You’re 45 years old, and have plenty of TIME and MONEY to become Oscar nominated (by producing/directing) if you really wanted to.

      • littlestar says:

        I am in the same boat as you……. I don’t want to do any work today, yet I am swamped with actual work at work :S. It’s snowing here again. I’d rather be at home, on the couch in front of the fireplace, cuddling with my cats and catching up on Celebitchy at a leisurely pace haha :D .

        I had no idea Handler used to praise Brad and AJ! And so not surprised by that either. I kind of figured that her friendship with Aniston took off after they both became clients of CAA. I think their friendship is more “business” (how do I explain this… being friends with another celebrity only because it helps you out in some way, NOT because you actually care for them). I think Aniston is likely more of a beyotch in real life than we think she is, but even now I still don’t understand why she’d want to be friends with someone like Handler. Handler just doesn’t seem like someone who’d be a good friend. Sure, even my girlfriends and I can be pretty raunchy with girl talk when we get together, but the thing is, we don’t do take it to the next level AND say it publicly as well like Handler does. She has no couth. Her jokes aren’t funny.

        Edit: I wonder if Aniston ever has had her sites set on getting on Oscar. To me, she’s not someone who is terribly ambitious. She has her routine and the things she likes and never seems to stray from them. She seems to only choose movies that get her the attention she craves, and not movies that improve her acting skills (as for the Good Girl, that was over a decade ago and there’s been nothing like it since).

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @littlestar (I too have a TON of work to do, ugh..I’m such a procrastinator–I blame CB)

        I could’ve sworn that Jennifer said she wanted an Oscar, but I can’t find anything to support that, so it might’ve been a figment of my imagination. On one hand I agree with you, but on the other hand, a person would think that someone who has her name recognition and money would *want* to do something that is Oscar worthy. As far as the Oscars go, I couldn’t care less if any one of my favorite actors won one–I mean, I think it’s a nice thing–but they’re my favorite because I think that they’ve already put out very good performances–Oscar worthy performances (not all, but you get what I mean).

        I don’t think that’s the case with Jennifer–to me, she is a terrible actress–and I would think that she would want to do something with her career, so that it isn’t particularly newsworthy that she gets headlines for going to Cabo EVERY YEAR, and weeks of speculation and articles about a stupid haircut. That’s sad, imo, that that’s all the media can talk about with her–vacations and haircuts. Not about her films, what she’s doing outside of her film work–nothing. She’s someone who gave out two different reasons, and at least two interviews on why she cut her hair–and she wasn’t even promoting a film or anything like that.

        I’ll be back–my mom’s home :(

      • littlestar says:

        Yes, you’d think that someone with her “star power” and wealth WOULD want an Oscar (granted, she did win an Emmy for Friends, so there’s that). But I reiterate – to me, she’s just not that ambitious. It’s like you said, we all talk about her hair, Justin, Cabo vacations, laugh at the silly movies she’s in that only get press because of her body….. And I think she’s happy with that, because it keeps her on everyone’s radar. I’m actually not an Aniston hater, I feel pretty neutral about her (although I do LOVE Angelina Jolie, always have). But it does irk me that someone with the ability to strive further in life doesn’t do that. But, everyone’s life is their own, so who am I to talk. I get wanting to go to Cabo every year (I could sure to go Cabo right now, this friggin’ snow will not let up), but it’s pretty telling that have rarely seen her go on vacation to other countries.

        Edit: Yes, Aniston is a very one-note actor. No range. Kind of like Clooney, yet somehow he has an Oscar and all the love! Lol.

      • @littlestar
        The thing is–she is ambitious. But I think she’s too lazy to do something about it. She started her own production company with her partner–who apparently has enough time to do interviews with her (she talked to the interviewers of Vanity Fair and Vogue), but not to produce any films—and said that the production company (that she got a bunch of options from Plan B when she got divorced) was created to make films to ‘empower’ women…except all she’s done is exec. produce her own crappy films. And TALK about how she’s going to produce/direct her own films–case in point: Goree Girls. That’s been on the drawing board for at least 6-8 years. She has enough money to finance the whole film herself–I don’t get why she doesn’t do that. I don’t think she wants to take risks–she’ll only direct something if she gets paid to do so i.e. that Lifetime short that she directed.

        I wish she would do *something*. A ton of women in Hollywood would KILL for her name recognition, so that they could get their films made and paid attention to–simply because of their name. I do hope she goes into directing and producing–but she’s 45 and has been talking about it for the past ten years. She’s not a baby–she should know what she wants by now.

        And even if she wasn’t ambitious–surely someone of HER name recognition and monetary worth could afford to wait until a decent rom com came out, or hired someone to write one–I saw the trailer for Wanderlust and couldn’t even imagine WHAT possessed her to sign onto that film—the trailer looked like a hot mess.

      • Maria says:

        Yup! Exactly… She’s one of Jen Aniston’s BFFs and she still can’t let go of the Brange subject… You know she has nothing else to talk about and she’ll be irrelevant once she stops talking about Angelina… What a loser she is.

    • Liv says:

      It’s more shocking when you see who her friends are. Charlize Theron, Reese Witherspoon and of course Jennifer Aniston. Disgusting.

      • Camille (The Original) says:

        It says more about Theron, Witherspoon and Aniston than anything else to me that they are ‘friends’ with trash like that…

      • Sea Dragon says:

        I watched a biography about Handler when she was on top of her game and she intrigued me enough to watch her show. Her appeal lasted only a couple months but I got the impression that she’s wild and a LOT of fun to be around when you want to party hard.

        I don’t think it’s shocking that these women are friends. Handler, Charlize, Aniston, Witherspoon, Paltrow and Cameron Diaz all live expensive lifestyles, enjoy getting a little (or a lot) fukced up* and though I’m not sure about Cameron, the rest seem like and/or do have reputations of being petty elitists. That’s enough to cement a bond between anyone. Lol

        *Charlize and JA are known pot heads and generally speaking, to be Chelsea’s friend you must drink.

  3. Meow Mix says:

    “shocking!” said no one.

  4. Zigggy says:

    She’s such an idiot and she’s not even funny.

  5. Andrea1 says:

    I wonder why people who have black kids like Sandra bullock and charlize theron are still friends with this vile racist. I guess birds of the same feather flock together. Am glad Angelina Jolie never acknowledges her. And also glad at the backlash she received for the tweets..

    • mercy says:

      Sandra is a friend of hers? Thst strikes me as an odd match.

      • Toot says:

        How do you know it’s an odd match? Sandra was married to Jessie James for YEARS. We don’t kn ow what Sandra is truly like.

      • mercy says:

        It seems like an odd match. None of us know for certain. Maybe Sandra didn’t know her husband as well as she thought she did. He’d been in the public eye for awhile and it took them time to dig up some of that stuff on him. A lot of them bought the idea that he was a changed man, and maybe he was for a short time before his true colours reared their ugly head again.

      • Bridget says:

        @toot: Sandra Bullock has been acknowledged by pretty much everyone she has worked with, from the fancy talent ALL the way down to the regular people crew, as being incredibly nice and caring. She’s been generous with her time and money for years but never toots her own horn about about it. Her ex husband is a total waste of space, but she’s earned the benefit of the doubt. And there are many, many individuals out there who wouldn’t particularly like their characters judged on the basis of who their ex-romantic partners turned out to be.

      • mercy says:

        Well said, Bridget. Given her reputation, her relationship with JJ was probably the result of her being the kind of good-natured person who looks for the best in people and believes in the posibility of redemption, not of sharing some racist beliefs. She probably felt protective of his kids, too.

  6. Jess says:

    And racism aside (which is disgusting) but they aren’t even funny. What exactly was she going for? Controversy? Lame.

    • lisa2 says:

      She is promoting her new crappy book. So like she has done before she brings up Angelina. I find all the adoption jokes about Angie and her family offensive. There are many celebs that have adopted children of different races. I think that the focus on this family is beyond the pale and disgusting. She wants attention for her book so she talks AJ. Strange since she doesn’t like her. But hey mention Angie’s name and you get attention. What happened to getting it because of your talent or being interesting..

      OH wait.. Handler is not talented nor interesting.. now I get it

      • Tiffany says:

        Because no other celebrity will attract attention like Jolie. You think if she used someone like Theron or Bullock it would attract any attention ( let’s just pretend they are not friends). I think not.

        Angelina Jolie- unwilling participant in people careers and interviews since 2004.

    • Janet says:

      It seems like a desperate attempt on her part to be noticed. It probably drives her insane that Angie has never given her the time of day.

    • starrywonder says:

      Yeah. She was not funny and racist to boot. Good for her.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      Exactly–I watched her show a few times with my grandma (who is up all night, and watches all the late night shows)–Handler isn’t even funny. All the other comedians on her show (whose names I can’t remember) were always funnier than she was.

      And I don’t get why she talks about tabloid rumors on her show–discussing them. It would be one thing if you did the same with your friends, in the privacy of your own home, and discussed/laughed at these dumb rumors–but on a talk show???

      If I was a fan of any celeb who went on that show–I would be mad that she spends what little time the celeb is on the show, to talk about stupid tabloid rumors that I KNOW AREN’T TRUE. That I know are 99.99999999999999% BS.

      And I wouldn’t want to go on a talk show that discusses those rumors with me (if I *am* a tabloid fixture, cough), because all that does is give the rumors a broader base to my fans, or to anyone else who watches the show with me on it. It sends a response to the tabloids—creating another story. Which is something you DON’T want.

  7. annaloo. says:

    I knew a girl likenthat growing up. Blonde and a bully. Total alpha chick. One day she’ll get her karma.

  8. hunaw says:

    I have read her first book,and I liked her sense of humor there,she made me laugh many times.However,her comments on Angelina and her stand up routines were very unfunny to me,I was kinda surprised.

  9. Mitch Buchanan Rocks! says:

    There was a little four year old who was so kind to my husband that I almost cried and I hope she never has to encounter filth like Chelsea or hear the N word but unfortunately she will and it breaks my heart that people like this creep can have a platform to spew hate on innocent beautiful children who make people happy. Chelsick Hinderer doesn’t make create joy or happiness.

  10. diva says:

    She’s gross and I’m side eyeing anyone that is friends with her. Smh….

  11. Virgilia Coriolanus says:

    I somewhat disagree on the validation part.

    I get that by commenting and paying attention to what Handler says, that feeds into it. More outlets will cover it, we complain about it, she says/does something else equally stupid, and the cycle continues.

    But here’s the thing–we’re only commenting on a gossip site. We’re (at least I’m not) not going onto her site, buying her books, buying tickets to her show, watching her show, etc. THAT is what validates her.

    How’s her show doing???–I heard the ratings were slipping, and don’t care enough to look it up.

    I read (gossip) stories about celebrities that I don’t care for, or don’t even think about–and I comment on them. That doesn’t validate their being (as a celebrity/actor)–all that means is that I like reading gossip about pretty much anyone. What does validate them is buying tickets to see their movies, and so on.

    So I don’t think that commenting on Chelsea Handler is going to make her go away any faster or slower. She’ll go away when the people who watch her show, buy tickets to her standup/books, stop doing so. Not before.

    Look at Paris Hilton.

  12. toto says:

    Handler the racist failed miserably just like her friend reunion timing with her bf trying to sabotage the oscars but no body cared to cover them.

    To be fair sandra Bullock and her photos with handler are so staged . Sanadra smile looks forced I think there is some contracts or agent agreement that that memebers should support eachother or somthing.
    I love sandra and I am sure business does not mean friendship.

  13. lower-case deb says:

    i get that she has a beef (or a cattlebarnful of em) with Angelina Jolie for whatever reason. it’s almost expected that she’d come up with something inane and crass about AJ. i think AJ herself was probably resigned to sighing loudly (in the “as long as it’s just me and not the people i love” kind of way)

    but Is Anything Sacred Anymore?
    Sidney Poitier? really? really? she just had to go there?

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      But she’s never met, talked to, or worked with Angelina. That’s the thing. And it’d be one thing if it was one throwaway joke or two–she’s been talking crap about Angelina in her public and personal persona for YEARS. Which is creepy.

      And it’s not like Angelina has responded, giving Chelsea reason enough to keep going–Angelina hasn’t ever issued a statement against Chelsea or otherwise indicated that she even knew that Chelsea was talking about her (which I’m sure she does know).

      So Chelsea comes off, in my mind, as a creepy stalker, and a terrible friend who doesn’t know when or how to keep her mouth zipped.

  14. mercy says:

    I like irreverent, bawdy humour, but that’s just gross and not funny at all. There was a time when I thought I might like her, but I’ve never managed to get through more than five minutes of her show. She and her crew are so boring. I can’t believe they’re still on the air.

  15. Renee28 says:

    I have a hard time believing Jen doesn’t condone Chelsea’s jokes about Angelina.

    • abby says:

      Of course Aniston condones/endorses it. Every time she goes on that show and Handler introduces her by way of degrading Angie/the JP kids followed by Aniston bouncing out all full of “American Sweetheart” swagger you know she full on endorses it because Handler says what Aniston cannot/will not. It allows Aniston to keep her little “Girl-Next-Door” hands clean and “classy” because she is so above it all. Bulls#it.

    • Sal says:

      Oh, Jen clearly LOVES it. A couple of years back, Handler introed Aniston by mocking Angelina’s children, their race, and Shiloh’s (a 4 year old at the time!) sexuality, and one time, called Angelina a c – and on cue, Aniston walked on, grinning like a Cheshire cat. That happened twice, that she was introed like that by Handler. So if she had a problem with it the first time, she never stopped Handler, thus the second time. There is no doubt at all that Aniston eggs her on to make these remarks. No doubt at….all!

  16. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Wow. I had no idea. I don’t watch her show or know much about her. I had a vague impression if her as an annoying little gnat buzzing around but certainly didn’t know about the racism. Disgusting and pathetic.

  17. Jen says:

    Won’t comment on this idiot. But everyone who actually saw the Oscars is giving Angelina a great deal of credit for saving Mr. Poitier’s dignity as he had some issues with pronouncing Cuaron’s name so she quietly and with class took over without embarrassing him. Then she also quietly stepped back and let the guys give each other their due. So, yeah for Angelina.

  18. Janet says:

    I think Handler has finally realized she hitched her wagon to a falling star and she’s trying desperately to make Brad and Angie take notice of her by any means possible.

    Speaking of which, where were her BFF and the boy-toy this past weekend? It looks like they couldn’t wangle an invite to the Oscars or any of the after-parties. It wouldn’t surprise me if Huvane eventually drops her as a client. He doesn’t want to be known as representing losers.

  19. Maya says:

    God this woman is vile and disgusting and something should be done about her and her show. People should boycott E until they fire Chelsea and take are show off the air. She is a another Paula Dean and should also be publicly prosecuted and lose her job etc. People should start a mass tweet to get her fired or something like that.

    I also judge people like Jennifer Aniston, Reese Witherspoon, Charlize Theron & Sandra Bullock who are all friends with her. Jennifer I dont give a shit about and is pathetic anyway and I dont care about Reese but Sandra and Charlize are equally disgusting since they have adopted black children and still are friends with this woman. I dont care if they are from the same agent (CAA) or that they have a mutual agreement to support etc – this is pathetic. I havent watched any Sandra or Charlize movies after finding out they are associated with this trash and many should follow suit so that they can see how their friendship with Chelsea is disgusting and harming them.

    • Josephina says:

      I completely agree with you. I had provided harsher commentary yesterday but CB/Kaiser chose not to post my comments.

      You are not the only one who feels strongly about this either.

      It is her choice to make frequent negative, insensitive jabs aimed at the race of a person. Racist jokes simply rub lots of persons the wrong way. She is now close to a female version of Rush Limbaugh.

      Chelsea takes full advantage of her afforded platform and our society’s desensitized stance on race. She knows it’s wrong and she does not care. And this is what make her ugly.

      • jammypants says:

        I agree. This is not even about women tearing down other women. She is one of the most negative people in the entertainment industry. She has quite a bit of public persuasion and look at how she uses her influence. On trash and vitriol, demeaning actual good people, while promoting fellow trash. She seems to be great at taking attention away from things with real meaning, like AJ’s years of effort towards eradicating poverty and injustice. Instead she puts attention on the possibility that AJ was a homewrecker. AND NEVER LET’S IT GO. I don’t get her obsession. It’s creepy and makes her come off as completely insane, insecure, and hateful. She is so self absorbed. She may come publicly as proud of her antics, but sometimes I wonder how much of personal shame is intermingled with that “pride”.

  20. Ice Queen says:

    Chelsea must feel incredibly low self esteemed and unaccomplished in life to write or say such stupid things. She’s not funny. Maybe she knows that and that’s way she does such things. Or maybe she was drunk in which case saying such things just confirms that she’s a frigging loser. What a waste of human flesh.

  21. GIRLFACE says:

    What an insecure, sad woman.

  22. roxy750 says:

    I wouldn’t call this racist—I would call this immature, foolish and really stupid—I mean she is a grown woman and acts like a teenager. It’s really an abomination (yes I said that word) for her to be anything in Hollywood. I mean she is literally the bottom of the barrel. Incredibly sickening.

  23. Luca26 says:

    She isn’t smart enough to pull off that brand of humor so she just comes off as immature, nasty and bigoted. I read one of her books which was funny enough but I HIGHLY doubt she wrote it on her own her show is unwatchable it’s so embarrassingly unfunny. She’s sucked up to the right PR people and this will blow over and she’ll be joking around with Oprah or some other high profile AA celeb like nothing happened. But I don’t think for a second she’s really friends with anyone in Hollywood. Eventually she will cross the line and her buddies will scatter.

  24. Dhavynia says:

    I’m not watching the Tonight Show today for obvious reasons

  25. Miller says:

    Yeah, I find her disgusting and not funny and she crosses the line often but the tweet about adopting Lupita would be kind of amusing if she didn’t so obviously steal it from the internet. It was all over tumblr and I saw it in other places too. I’ve heard people repeat it in real life. I doubt she came up with it on her own.

  26. Tiffany says:

    Of course Huffington is not going to take it down. Jolie has written several op ed pieces and she went to everyone but them. Arianna Huffington can be just as petty as Chelsea when she wants to be.

    I have also been ready this story and comments on other sites and I am just amazed that people really are not seeing this woman for what she is. She will have defenders until the end of days and we are just too sensitive and cannot take a joke. *Facepalm*

  27. komedi says:

    3) “like to stop the microwave with 1 second to go. Choose one of the many different crazy character mouths and place Mouth Off in front of your face. We permit those stops us from achieving our objectives, our aspiration and our desires.

  28. Kim1 says:

    Handjob/Handler is on Kelly and Michael Show right now.She says Sandra picked her up and took her to Madonna party.Kelly and Michael also attended.Madonna and Miley had a dance off.Handler mentioned hitting on a tour guide in Africa UNTIL she learned he had a GF.Kelly response” That is because you are a girl’s girl”
    GMAFB Handjob screwed her married boss at E
    So she is friends with Sandra for Sandra to go by her house and take her to Madonna party.I wonder if she calls Louis a cute little monkey?

    • Toot says:

      Told ya’ll. Sandra has a very good front. Poor Louis.

    • Eva says:

      I am so sick of hearing this phrase “girls girl”. This woman obviously has no clue what Angelina is trying to do for men women and children around the world. She is a world class idiot. And I don’t normally like to call people ugly, but my god she is inside and out.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Yeah–I’m not understanding how Angelina isn’t a ‘girl’s girl’, when she’s built schools and funded programs to specifically help and educate young girls who otherwise wouldn’t be able to go….while Chelsea’s done what??? Produced a reality show, that starred one of those idiot girls that were robbing celebrities–the Bling Ring–while the girl was on TRIAL. I saw that phone call that Alexis Neiers made to Nancy Jo Sales–while she was on TRIAL–documented by that reality show.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HWpJmiRaIM

    • Kim1 says:

      Handler and Sandra are friends.She was Sandra’s guest when Sandra received her star on Walk of Fame last September.Sandra took Handler to Madonna party Sunday night.Those are facts.
      On a side note I noticed Sandra wasnt her usual Happy self.I read her dad is ill.This is a rumor.

  29. elisa says:

    ugh, just ugh

    That’s all I’ve got.

  30. TheCountess says:

    Huffington Post is a cesspool – one of the few websites where the posts are more offensive that the comment replies. Chelsea fits right in.

    • bluhare says:

      I resent that. I used to post there all the time until they required you to have a Facebook or twitter account to post. And I wasn’t offensive. Quite the reverse. The worst on that site are the conservatives who wander over just to troll liberals. I imagine it’s the same on Fox News’ site, although I’ve never wanted to go look.

      • TheCountess says:

        You posted articles on Huffington Post as an author? I think you missed my point if you didn’t.

        If you ever want to see a real cesspool of commentary, go to a Deadline/THR article after Drudge has linked it. Doesn’t matter what the article is about: “Obummer! Hollyweird!” They’re pathetic.

  31. tricklady says:

    AND she is laughing all the way to the bank!

  32. The Original G says:

    http://on.aol.com/video/the-makers-conference–chelsea-handler-518121400

    So, I haven’t been a fan of Handlers. I did watch her interview at the Makers Conference and I have to say that I was really won over by her work with young women, that I didn’t know about and her general demeanor. It made me decide to watch her a little more carefully.

    I can’t reconcile the person in this interview with the one who made these dumb jokes. I don’t think Angelina is above being the object of humor. Chelsea just can’t make Angelina funny. You’d think she’d learned that by now.

  33. Mich says:

    I am stunned by those tweets and by the fact that HuffPo aligned itself with such a racist bitch. She deserves Paula Deen treatment, why isn’t she getting it?

  34. Hannah says:

    Bar being racist its also not funny. It’s lazy and crude. I can think of at least 10 comedians who would have made a better go of it, because they are more clever and creative.

  35. loma says:

    This is the first time I’ve clicked on a Chelssea Handler blog post on Celebitchy & now that I have, I will never click on another.

  36. John says:

    I really want to support women in entertainment, particularly comedy, but ever since Girls Behaving Badly, I have just always found her to be very mean-spirited, and it taints even her truly funny stuff.

  37. jammypants says:

    Now there is an extremely insecure woman if I ever saw one.

  38. Jessica says:

    Never liked her. She’s not even that funny either.

  39. truthful says:

    She’s ignorant and racist but I am really pissed at the Huffington Post…
    that says a lot about them.

  40. Paloma says:

    This blog seems as good as any to bring up the subject of The Aniston. Any sightings of her at the Oscars or after parties? And was she with the mister?

  41. And as an aside–

    I was going through the Oscar pictures on PEOPLE—Sibi Bale is definitely pregnant. She had a visible belly..look!!!

    http://www.people.com/people/special/0,,20783495,00.html#14&id=1582721

    Awww….

  42. Bridget says:

    Is it just me, or has there been an absence of photos of Chelsea Handler and Jennifer Aniston? They were tight for a while there, and it felt like Handler talked about Aniston a lot… and then nothing. She wasn’t even a part of the NY trip to Mexico. It looks like Aniston returned back into Courtney Cox’s fold – anyone else getting the feeling that the Aniston-Handler friendship has cooled off a lot?

    • I’m thinking so too–the last time Jennifer was on Chelsea’s show, was to promote ‘We’re the Miller’s'–back in August 2013. So the next time Jennifer has a movie come out, then we’ll see if they’re still friends. Because Jennifer goes on the show all the time–to promote her films, and she’s done it a few times for no apparent reason at all.

      I would wonder if the cooling off period had to do with how foolish Chelsea Hander looked, in my opinion, by calling a person a ‘demon’ and ‘not a girl’s girl’, shortly before said person revealed to the world that she had undergone a double mastectomy, and highlighted the fact that women’s health is being treated callously by the government and insurance companies. And got the media to talk about women’s health for a good month—I still see a few articles here and there pop up, mentioning Angelina–on yahoo.

      But who knows if they were just keeping a low profile, but still being friends. Jennifer went to Cabo, what, twice???? this year? And Chelsea wasn’t at Thanksgiving… Chelsea didn’t go either times–so it could either be that they’re not as close as they once were, or they were trying to wait a while before doing something like THIS^^^^^^…who knows??

      I thought after the double mastectomy, Chelsea would keep her trap shut–but I was wrong. So I vote on them just wanting to keep quiet about it for a little bit, until the public forgot. We have no clue how often they hang out in private–and for all we know, Chelsea had stuff to do during the vacations/Thanksgiving.

      • Bridget says:

        Its a lot more than that – the Aniston-Handler friendship really started up when the Aniston-Cox friendship noticeably cooled. Cox and Handler represent 2 VERY different lifestyles: Cox is essentially a Hollywood mom, and hangs with that crew, who have kids and families. While Handler is a HARD partier, who has made no bones about sleeping her way to her job. Supposedly Aniston and Cox fell out over Cox’s divorce and the way she immediately hooked up with a co-star, and then Aniston partied her way throigh the last few years with another designated single person.

  43. womanaman says:

    not gonna lie, I lol’d but Im drunk so please forgive me celebithers:(:(:(

  44. Shopperetta says:

    After watching the Oscars, I was really impressed with how warm, friendly, and gracious Angelina Jolie was. She was very kind with Sidney Poitier and then so animated when they were taking the selfie. I like her so much more now!

    As for Chelsea Handler, it must be awful to have your entire career be about being vulgar and rude. I imagine it can wear on the soul to contribute only to the negativity of the world.

  45. Nikita says:

    Chelsea is too stupid to realize that she doesnt hurt Angelina, she hurts her Kids.
    Her Kids came from very difficult circumstances and Chelse is shading the kids. Like it is wrong to adopt children at all. This joke goes not only out to Angelina, it goes out to every Child who is adopted and to every Parent who adopted a Child. She has no clue what that means to adapt a Child, she only knows how to drink her vodka and make fun of other people.
    Chelsea slept her way up to her career, what else is there to expect from this uneducated white trash`?

  46. MissWilson says:

    I think she’s hilarious. I love inappropriate jokes. I can’t wait to read her new book. I almost peed my pants laughing at her other ones. She’s an offensive comedian. That’s her personality. I just accept it and love her for who she is.

    • Nikita says:

      there are people who cover their ugly self with “comedy”, and shes one of them.
      she does not know what comedy is. Its no coincidence that people question her so called “comedy”
      If she were truely talented, she didnt had to sleep her way up like she did. And i think that is her main problem, everybody knows that and it kills her. Thats why shes mean, not comedic.
      Isnt it funny that she never make jokes about Brad? Shes a typical mean girl, she attacts the woman, not the man. some women are the biggest a…h.les to other women.

    • Adrien says:

      Not sure if your comment was serious. She can be funny only when things are scripted. She can’t do extemporaneous jokes (as evident in her tweets). She just says insulting stuff which she perceives as funny. I’ve seen Kathy Griffin and Sarah Silverman and they both say offensive stuff but they were hilarious and entertaining. Chelsea sounds like an office party clown.

  47. Evi says:

    Maybe it’s because I’m not American and don’t live in America, but I don’t understand how Chelsea Handler has a job.
    She is such a crap interviewer [on her own talk show]. She has no etiquette, but more importantly she has no charisma.

  48. Adrien says:

    I actually didn’t notice the racist parts coz her tweets were so painfully unfunny. Brad’s movie won and Angelina’s a remarkable person.

  49. Snappyfish says:

    Handler is on Howard Stern now name dropping all her “friends” Jen, Sandy blah blah. She isn’t funny or interesting. She is just an unfunny famewhore. Let’s not forget how she got her job at E. Sleeping with the head of the network (a married man at the time) once she got the ‘big’ contract she dumped him. Such a “girl’s girl” is she!!

    Let’s remember that is why she disses AJ because she isn’t a “girl’s girl” but it was perfectly fine for JA to snake (purchase) Theroux from Bivens

    Just go away Chelsea, having famous friends doesn’t make you relevant.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      That’s what I don’t get about Handler–it’s well documented that she slept with her married boss, and then dumped him as soon as he gave her a contract. That’s a fact. So how on earth does she feel comfortable throwing stones? Especially since what she did was worse than just sleeping with a married man. She used him to get what she wanted, and then when she didn’t need him anymore, she broke up with him. If I was her, I wouldn’t be throwing any stones, at anyone. Especially since she doesn’t seem apologetic about it at all.

      And yeah–how is it that she can ignore the fact that when Penelope Spheeris (that director on the set of ‘Five’) was telling reporters that Jennifer was introducing Justin around the set as her boyfriend, IN THE SAME MONTH that Justin and Heidi went, AS A COUPLE to a Broadway premiere–didn’t look on and off to me. So I don’t understand how you can just blatantly ignore something like that, while repeatedly bashing another woman for the same thing–well Jennifer and Justin were worse.