Tom Hiddleston finally explains why his cameo was cut out of ‘Ultron’

wenn22922919

Around this time last year, Idris Elba dropped a huge spoiler about The Avengers: Age of Ultron in the middle of an interview. At the time, it was widely believed that neither Idris nor Tom Hiddleston would appear in Ultron, but Idris told a media outlet that he and Tom had filmed some scenes undercover. Joss Whedon got mad, and when Ultron came out several months ago, fan-boys were upset because there was NO LOKI. Many thought that those cameos were edited out just out of spite, because Idris ruined the surprise. But Digital Spy asked Tom about it this week, and he gave up the real reason why he was edited out:

Tom confirms that he did shoot for a day but chalks up being edited out of the film as a weird storytelling quirk, as in the audiences felt like something else was going on. Tom says in part: “I was part of the dream sequence for Thor in the film. I shot for a day and enjoyed it very much. But in test screenings, audiences had over-emphasized Loki’s role; they thought that Loki was controlling Ultron. It was imbalancing audience’s expectations.” Do you buy that? I kind of buy that. And Tom says that Kevin Feige was the one to call him and tell him that, which is the most interesting part, I think. Tom is a real Company Man and it feels like Feige appreciates the Hiddles loyalty.

Meanwhile, in the same Hello Magazine interview where Tom talked about how he wanted a girlfriend who reminded him of his mum, there are a few additional quotes. As you see, Tom was sent off to boarding school at a very young age. Traditionally, upper-crust boys get sent off to boarding school around the age of 8/9, then Tom attended Eton at the same time as Eddie Redmayne and Prince William. This is how Tom described his boarding school experience:

“It was a like a mixture of summer camp and Harry Potter without the magic, so I had a good time. Boarding school is an interesting experience because you’re all away from home with each other at a very early age, so the friendships you form with people are very strong. The friends that I made at school are among the closest I have and wherever we see each other we just pick up where we left off.”

Among those who Tom bonded with was fellow actor Eddie Redmayne and Britain’s Prince William. Although he hasn’t really stayed in touch with the royal, he is still close to Eddie, who is also enjoying career success after winning the best actor Oscar for The Theory of Everything this year (15).

“Well, I think Prince William is rather busy these days and has other things to do than hang out with me,” he said. “But I did see him at the premiere of War Horse a few years back, which was nice. I see a lot more of Eddie – we’re very good friends, and have been for 20 years.”

[From The Belfast Telegraph]

I can sort of see how parents could send off a 13-year-old boy to boarding school. But any younger than that, it just seems… mean. I also can’t help but feel like Tom’s boarding school education is probably one of the reasons he’s like an overeager puppy about to piddle on the carpet when he gets too excited.

Here are some photos of Tom at Crimson Peak photocall in Barcelona yesterday. Much lavender. Very vest.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Getty.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

253 Responses to “Tom Hiddleston finally explains why his cameo was cut out of ‘Ultron’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lilacflowers says:

    Much lavender. Very vest. Yes.

    The actors shouldn’t be the ones put on the spot of having to explain why a scene was cut.

    Anyway, we’re continuing the international theme on the veranda and in the meadow because we’re not sure where Tom will pop up next, although rumors place him back in London today.

    Colin is planning ahead for much celebration for the Today show appearance next week – lots of breakfast goodies — and the Colbert show appearance. Since it is harvest time, lots of apple and pumpkin fare will be featured, including pumpkin martinis.

    • Boston Green Eyes says:

      I’m here early. Ready to get the pah-ty stah-ted!

      Anyway, Lilac, when does CP open in Boston? Did I misread that you saw it last weekend?

      • Lilacflowers says:

        I have not seen it. It probably opens on Thursday the 15th. I’m seeing it on Fridsy the 16th

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        Seeing it downtown at IMax? Enjoy! I will be there on Thursday!

      • Lilacflowers says:

        I think IMAX is the way to see naked Tom butt. I won’t be there Thursday because I promised a friend I would see BC’s Hamlet at the Coolidge. I would prefer to be at Crimson Peak but we do these things for friends

      • Boston Green Eyes says:

        Hmmm. Then I won’t be able to see it until after my trip to London and Paris.

        C’est la vie.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        Could you see it in London or Paris? Not that anyone wants to spend time in a movie theater in London or Paris.

      • icerose says:

        it opens here in in the UK the next two weeks but limited venues -i am still trying to track down showing times in my ara

    • NUTBALLS says:

      Word on the street he will be attending the BFI gala this evening. Here’s hoping Tuxedo Tom makes an appearance, and cleanses our memories of the Evening Standard awards, where he was jetlagged, gaunt and wearing the wrong hair.

      • icerose says:

        I know -his new Ambassador job sound just up his street especially with his knowledge of films.Still hoping he will be at his film but not so sure now

    • icerose says:

      london on Thursday I am hoping

  2. Sochan says:

    Tom, Tom, Tom. I just read something last night where he was asked about being the next James Bond and he went on one of this usual tears of over-explaining that ends up coming off thirsty but with faux humility. Tom is not JB material and I just wish he would stop letting journalists light him up and setting him off. I like Tom and I think he is an immensely watchable and captivating actor onscreen, but he’s an enigma to me as a person — and not in a good way. I just can’t read him. I feel he’s always got an act going and usually the consequences are embarrassing. I haven’t even watched the Graham Norton interview. I know I’m going to experience second-hand embarrassment, so I just don’t bother. I wish he would learn to control himself and just exude an air of mystery.

    • Vesta says:

      I can read him. When Tommy says “I want a nice & kind girlfriend, just like my mum” it means “I want a manipulative naughty Domina, but I hope my mum never finds that out” #iamjustkidding

      • V4Real says:

        I like Tom but I noticed when Michael B. Jordan referred to women as females a lot of us was put off . But when Tom referred to women in that same manner I don’t think anyone or many complained. This was on his post about wanting a woman like his mom and he used the word female.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @V4Real, I wasn’t put off by Michael B. Jordan saying “females.” I was put off by what he had to say about females. As for Tom, the article was cobbled together from something he said years ago and the terms “female” and “girls” both appear outside the quotes so they are more likely the words of the writer.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        And why is the term *females* a problem? Isn’t that a scientific term that distinguishes us from males?

      • V4Real says:

        @ Lilac I understand that you’re not put off by the term but by how Jordan used it. But other posters were saying they don’t like the term female or being called female regardless of how it’s used.

        @NUTBALL I don’t know what’s wrong with the word. You have to find that answer from the ones that had an issue with it. Read Jordan’s post. I even joked if women dislike the word female I guess they should change all forms that says sex, check male or female.

      • embertine says:

        Female and male are adjectives, not nouns. It is incorrect to refer to women as females. More to the point, in discussion of gender, you rarely see “females and males”, you usually see “females and men”. It’s dehumanising behaviour that is very, very rarely applied equally to both men and women, and that’s why most people who have a problem with it do.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        I would disagree that most people have a problem with it. It’s used quite freely in society without anyone complaining.

        It is an adjective that defines the sex that bears young or produces eggs. I think it’s splitting hairs to get worked up for whether or not it’s used by some in conjunction with males or not.

        I don’t think less of myself for being referred to as a female, nor do I consider it dehumanizing for any of us to be referred to as such. It’s what we are. We’re equal, but different than males.

        I think it’s more important to call out incorrect meaning attached to words, not the use of the word itself.

      • embertine says:

        I didn’t say that most people have a problem with it. I said that, for those that do, this is the reason I have heard used most often.

        I absolutely don’t think it’s splitting hairs to discuss whether it’s used more often than “males”, If you are using an adjective that can be applied to animals for one gender, but never or rarely the other, then it’s unlikely to be a random happenstance.

      • jammypants says:

        V4Real, you might have missed my response in the mum discussion, but Tom NEVER called women “females”.

      • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

        Why is the word “female” a problem? We are either males or females… People really get upset, just because they want to get upset… Tsh…

      • icerose says:

        male and female just define gender -not sure why people have an issue this-they tell you which toilet you might want to use-etc etc

      • NUTBALLS says:

        embertine, I don’t think it matters how often it’s used as long as it’s used correctly. Female is the correct category for both girls and women as males are for boys and men.

        If females are spoken of in a disrespectful manner, then by all means point out the fallacy. But the actual use of the word for those of us that possess a vag is entirely correct. Unless someone tries to change the definition of the word, then it seems a non-issue to me.

    • Gingerly says:

      Either you will get used to his ways of speaking or you will watch him only in his works, which would be just fine. He has been like that since he worked as a theater actor and he will not change, I think. And there are some good interviews like the Muse of Fire as well.

      I don’t think TH is thirsty about being cast as Bond as he already filmed the Night Manager where he could play a character who is a more nuanced, modern version of Bond. He was being just polite as usual and would like to pass the question without making trouble.

      • MexicanMonkey says:

        I just saw the interview now, and I think it’s exactly like you said he’s just being polite. I never would have expected him to say that he would never want to play Bond even though I suspect it’s not even on his radar.
        This guy gets so much crap for bring nice it’s hilarious.

      • icerose says:

        i have no issues with Tom as Bond -he has the right charm and style-I was a fan of the originaL/ Bonds Moore and Connery and did not enjoy the switch to a muscle bound action Bond -to be honest i have not watched since the originals as they lost their appeal for me.
        But on an acting front I hope h does not get offered it as I would rather he stayed with more interesting films

    • Lilacflowers says:

      There is actually a videoclip of the reporter asking him the question.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34448870/tom-hiddleston-is-enjoying-the-possibility-of-being-james-bond

      All British actors of a certain age are asked about their interest in Bond whenever the current Bond’s contract is nearing its end. The reporter’s write-up gushes far more than he does.

      • neutral says:

        And there is absolutely nothing wrong with his reply in the interview. Given that he is not clairvoyant is he actually going to say “No fear, no way”?

      • Lilacflowers says:

        Exactly. The reporter’s write-up of it was what was too much and off-putting. It was like she didn’t even pay attention to her own interview.

      • Gingerly says:

        In the video the interviewer looked like a happy Hiddlestoner while he tried to give a quick, light-hearted answer in a self-deprecating way.

      • icerose says:

        @Jimmypants well said

    • jammypants says:

      I’m kind of tired of people saying they’d wish he’d be a certain way that pleases them. I mean you are entitled to feeling that way, but he is what he is. I like him just fine. He’s not perfect. I never saw him as perfect. I think people who do are having a hard time accepting him are ones who want him to be perfect. He is someone who can be charming, mysterious, hardworking, talented, sweet, and embarassingly overeager. He chooses quite dark roles for someone who’s a ray of sunshine. He can be articulate, scholarly, and a huge goofball. That’s just who he is. He’s been this way for years. I don’t know why some people seem so disillusioned. I’m pretty sure he’s going to be like that for as long as we know him.

      People just want him to be that cool guy, but he’s said himself, he’s never been cool. He’s always been passionate.

      • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

        + 100000.He is who he is, not who people want him to be. I like him, he’s a fine actor, he gives interesting interviews, he’s a cutie pie and he also has flaws… So what? Don’t we all?

      • jammypants says:

        yea it’s no fault of his own that he’s not that ideal guy some people want him to be. To me, he’s still an ideal actor to admire. Like I’m ok with the criticisms, but when you have actual horrible people like Mel Gibson or Tom Cruise, it’s so over the top to pick at every little harmless flaw TommyAnne has, especially when we are all flawed.

      • Hannah says:

        every actor gets this, he’s not critiqued more than the rest . Anne Hathaway got far worse for the same over eager behaviour. Tom mostly gets away with what Hathaway was ridiculed for, becaus he’s a boy and most women are for some reason programmed to be harder on other women.

      • jammypants says:

        I don’t think either are problematic as people, so I find the criticisms over the top. Like I really don’t mind people say he is cringey, but reading statements like “I wish he would learn to control himself and just exude an air of mystery” I would have to disagree with. He is who he is.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      @Embertine, according to Merriam-Webster, “female” and “male” are also nouns

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        Thank you for this modicum of sanity, @Lilacflowers. How the discussion progressed as far as it did without this being pointed out is beyond me.

  3. Lalabella says:

    I swear I see the outline of a peen in the first pic.

  4. embertine says:

    I was 7, but then I’m not a boy.

    • LAK says:

      I was much younger. Hated first term. loved the other years. it was all Enid Blyton-esque. exactly as Tom describes it.

      and yes, all the friends i made then, are still friends now. much closer than friends i made as an adult.

      • embertine says:

        Mine wasn’t at all Enid Blyton-esque unless you count the rampant classism, and at least three of the teachers/housemistresses were later fired for sexual or physical abuse of the children in their care. I am not in touch with any of the people I went to that school with.

      • LAK says:

        goodness Embertine, what school was this?

      • embertine says:

        Wells Cathedral School in Somerset, 25 years ago.

      • neutral says:

        embertine, was that where they have the row of very old houses behind the cathedral which are use for dormatories/classrooms?

      • embertine says:

        Kind of, yes. The boarding houses are not actually around the Cathedral; most of them are along the street called The Liberty (HA!) and most of the classrooms are behind there too. But it’s a tiny city and everything is very close together.

      • neutral says:

        embertine, I think it is Vicar’s Close that I mean – I visited Wells three years ago and went to look at the street. I have photos to prove it!
        http://www.wellssomerset.com/search/entry1018_vicars_close_wells.html

      • embertine says:

        Yes, one of the senior boys’ houses is in Vicar’s Close: Shrewsbury, the house my brother was in. Great photos, BTW!

      • neutral says:

        Sorry I misled you embertine, those aren’t my photos! They are someone’s on tripadvisor. I have a couple on may laptop but don’t know how to upload them.

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        Wow, this really brings back memories! I am embarrassed to say how long ago I was in Wells!

    • M.A.F. says:

      I always wanted to go to boarding school. I blame Heidi & Clara (she does eventually go to boarding school right?)

  5. SloaneY says:

    I could not imagine sending my 7-10 year to boarding school. Or even up to 13. They really need parental guidance so much. And I would miss them terribly!

    • Miss Jupitero says:

      My nephew just turned eight, and…. NO, not even to Eton. I don’t get this at all. Even thirteen seems odd.

      • icerose says:

        i chose not to send my to boarding school or a day public school but feel okay about others who chose to do so.My eldest brother went to boarding school and he was fine with it but i think in the past a lot of bullying and abuse was brushed under the carpet-i think increased awareness has gone along was to stopping it.
        All types of schools have issues-there was some terrible bullying at my kids school and the teachers did not handle it well and my guess.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        My 8YO would be devastated to leave me. I am his favorite playmate. I expect that it will change as he closes in on 13 and the opinion of his friends matters more. Right now, he thinks I know a few things that he doesn’t and I’m trying to milk it for all it’s worth!

    • p'enny says:

      i’d send kids to boarding school at 7, I;d send them at 18months! especially if they cry a lot 🙁 7-10 is great age to starting build independence and get active and do loads of clubs and sports and stufff. Kids these days are swaddled by parents, theyre not even allowed on a bus or walk to School these days, without parents fussing.

      boarding schools can be a nightmare and can be fun for kids, it depends I guess, and they go home at weekends or spend most of the weekend with parents visiting them.

      i dont want to comment on tom’s personal life, but this is open knowledge and his parents split at 13 so, i can imagine there was a lot of arguing and crap going on in their household. probably best being away from it.

      I wish i was sent to boarding school pillow fights and trunk boxes full of sweets

      • embertine says:

        They go home at weekends? All the boarders at my school were military brats and we got to see our parents three times a year in the holidays. Why would someone be at boarding school if their parents live close enough to visit every week?

        As for the pillow fights and trunks full of sweets, I really wish people would stop thinking that Harry Potter is what life at boarding school is like.

        ETA: It’s not just the British either; I worked as an under-gardener in a girls’ school in my year out from college. They took boarders from 11, and one little (French) girl’s parents were shocked when the school rang the first Christmas holiday to check who was coming to pick her up. They thought they didn’t have to pick her up until she was 18.

      • neutral says:

        Not very maternal then p’enny?

      • p'enny says:

        my brother went to bording school and i pinched his trunk, it’s still mine and i refuse to let him have it. 🙂 He had two trunks, a big black one and small wooden one. Brilliant items.

        i had pillow fights all the time as a kid, but i never went boarding school.

        seriously, boarding school can be very hard for some kids, others thrive off it.

      • LAK says:

        embertine: your version of boarding school sounds positively dickensian which is certainly off putting, but not entire case.

      • icerose says:

        i know someone who was a single parent and her teenage kids were driving her crazy -the council sent them to boarding and she said it was the best thing to have happened and her relationship with them turned right around

    • EN says:

      I wish somebody sent me to a boarding school at 12 y.o., I was so done with my parents. ))
      I think 13 -14 y.o. is a good age to send kids to a boarding school. They start fighting authority and want more freedom at that age. And the structure at school is more suitable for dealing with that as well as giving them opportunity to socialize, than a frazzled parent who came home after 12 hour workday.

      I went away to college at 16 y.o., and it wasn’t a moment too soon.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        I was 16 when I attending college too. I was miserable in high school and couldn’t wait to be independent and living 5,000 miles away. Thankfully, my parents could see that letting me leave home at an early age would do wonders for my relationship with them, which it did.

      • SloaneY says:

        13 I get but not 7. That is way too early.

      • embertine says:

        Yeah, I’m not anti-boarding school, particularly for teenagers. I just wish that people would think to themselves before they have kids: do I want to raise my children myself, with all the good times and bad times that entails? Because if not: DON’T BREED. There are 7 billion people on this godforsaken planet, leave the child-rearing to people who can actually be bothered to do it.

    • scone says:

      It is quite a class thing here too, I am, for example, way too lower middle class to consider it. Hell, I feel uncomfortable at the thought of private schools and their insularity!

      My son is 10, daughter rapidly approaching the teen years, and yet the thought of not seeing them everyday makes me feel sick.

  6. manda says:

    Hey there, fans of tom hiddleston! Just in case you didn’t know, but you all probably do, he was in a british police procedural show called wallander that is on netflix. I happened to be watching and heard his voice and immediately thought of all of you!

    • Hudson Girl says:

      Which episode? I just started watching that on Netflix and I’m enjoying it (there’s no Season 1).
      I saw some of Tom’s interview the other day. It wasn’t that bad. I hadn’t really seen him in one before.
      My takeaway: his accent feels like someone is rubbing hot fudge on your body and licking it off. Slowly. Eton and Cambridge? Apparently, I love a posh English accent. Off to stalk some Cambridge men.

    • neutral says:

      You need the Kenneth Branagh versions Hudson Girl.

    • icerose says:

      great series and Tom was on top form comedy wise

  7. vauvert says:

    Still not sure why Tom gets flak for being a good corporate player. Actors get criticized here all the time for being angsty and not doing their part in the promotion, or for saying stupid things in interviews, or for coming across as entitled celebs. All Tom does is be upbeat and enthusiastic. The way I look at it, when I plan a major franchise, do I call people like Tom and Eddie… And my answer is hell yes.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      He does his job and that’s what any employer would want. He did all the Asian PR work and most of the European PR for TDW by himself and Feige knows that.

    • Gingerly says:

      Maybe double standard? Or because this is CB? Maybe because a few of his promotion interviews sound rather cringeworthy while most interviews are harmless and focus only on his films? I am sure Marvell, Legendary, and del Toro must be happy with Tom’s eager participation in the promotion. His next film, Skull Island, is also produced by Legendary. So, Tom has enough reasons to do his best in promoting CP.

    • neutral says:

      @vauvert – I prefer Tom’s attitude to Andrew Garfield’s.

  8. BearcatLawyer says:

    He’s right about the friendships you make in boarding school. To this day my closest, most loyal, most trustworthy friends are people I met at boarding school. Even if we do not talk for a few years, when we resume it is like no time has passed. I am so glad I had that experience too as it changed my life for the better.

    • LAK says:

      if and when i have any kids, they are definitely going. It’s been a very positive experience for my entire family and i’m going to carry on the tradition.

  9. Catherine says:

    I thought he didn’t board until he went to Eton at 13?

    • Lilacflowers says:

      That’s what I thought as well. He didn’t board at the Dragon School.

    • neutral says:

      I think the interview has it wrong too. I doubt very much that Tom boarded until he got to Eton, bearing in mind that he lived in Oxford at the time so there would be no need to board.
      And also re going to Eton at 13, it would be quite normal in his circles at school because a lot did go on to boarding school at 13 and you can be sure he wouldn’t be the only one to go to Eton from his class. (as in school class!!)

    • p'enny says:

      boys board at 13 at Eton, not younger.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Right p’enny, I was thinking that he was at the Dragon School prior to Eton, which was in his hometown of Oxford.

    • The Understudy says:

      I dug up the quote below from Young Hollywood as it surprised me when I read it, unless it’s a misunderstanding by the interviewer he must have boarded at The Dragon School.

      “he shared a story with me from his boarding school days as a lad and hearing some particularly unsettling things during the night, like a horse trotting down the hallway outside his dorm room. This was in England, of course, where just about every square inch of the country is probably haunted by something or other! (And he acknowledged that his impressionable 7-year-old imagination may have been running away from him that night.)”

  10. Beth No. 2 says:

    Oooh I like this waistcoat and lavender shirt combo. He looks good.

    • frisbee says:

      Yes it is a WAISTCOAT!!!!

      • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

        waistcoat – Br English
        vest – Am English.. 🙂

      • frisbee says:

        @ Sol – Exactly! When I see or hear the word ‘vest’ I think of something like this (sorry, it will probably make the cold shower unnecessary!)
        https://talknormal.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/string-vest.jpg
        in the UK it’s an undergarment…
        😀

      • NUTBALLS says:

        frisbee, your Britishness is showing.

        PANTS!! VEST!! SWEATER!! APARTMENT!! SOCCER!! COLLEGE!! ELEVATOR!! GASOLINE!! VACATION!! OVERALLS!! HOOD!! TRUNK!! GARBAGE!!

        FRIES!!

      • frisbee says:

        NUTBALLS!

        TROUSERS!! WAISTCOAT!! JUMPER!! FLAT!! FOOTBALL!! UNIVERSITY!! LIFT!!

        And most important of all great, big, fat, luscious CHIPS!!

        😀

      • icerose says:

        great series and Tom was on top form comedy wise

      • icerose says:

        I tend to use either because i have spent time in both Canada and the UK–I use to say ” I m going to take a bath and inevitably my UK husband would say where ar you going to take-drove me up the wall

      • NUTBALLS says:

        frisbee (or perhaps I should say “disk” since I play Ultimate) —

        I’m down with chips, but you know I mean crisps…

      • frisbee says:

        NUTBALLS Your transatlantic linguistic gymnastics are really impressive!
        And of course you can call me ‘disk’ if you want. My username is actually in honour of a late, beloved border Collie and frisbee monster called Jada but I dropped that bit because it was a mouthful.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        frisbee, Celebitchy has given me a transatlantic linguistic and all-around cultural education beyond what could have gained short of relocating across the pond. I love y’alls putdowns The Best!

        Chippy Git is my favourite (and a “u” for you)!

        RIP Jada, frisbee monster.

      • Dara says:

        Just to add to the list – Fanny, Fag, Biscuit and Snog. If it weren’t for the cross-cultural utopia that is CB I wouldn’t know the subtle nuances in any of those.

        But what in the ever-loving-hell is a Numpty? Is that British or Canadian? Is it dirty (she asks hopefully)?

      • frisbee says:

        @ Dara – I’m a day late – due to the time difference! ‘Numpty’ – definitely British as I’ve not heard anybody else use it. The nearest equivalent is somebody who is a little bit of a Dick but in an inoffensive way. So if a friend of mine did something really stupid (which we all do occasionally – of course) I’d say “ooh you are a Numpty” there’s an element of affection in it that’s totally lacking in calling someone a Dick. Although of course we do use ‘Dick’ but our equivalent to that is ‘Prat’.
        ‘Doucebag’ we established the other day is definitely a ‘Wanker’ to us. We’ve had long convo’s on this site about Anglo/American translations of rude words. We all know that ‘Shag’ is British for er, F*ck? We use the f word as well but I think Shag sounds like a big, hairy, friendly dog and is a lot gentler whilst retaining it’s lustful quality. Some of our phrases are colourful to. If someone get’s on my nerves, then “they are getting on my tit’s” – someone rushing around ineffectually is “like a fart in a colander”, I could go on but I have to get ready for my day. Have a good one you lot!
        NUTBALLS Thanks for the ‘u’ and the RIP, I really loved that dog and it means a lot!

      • NUTBALLS says:

        frisbee, it’s past my bedtime and you’re already starting a new work day!

        I like how your equivalents sound less vulgar and harsh than ours — Shag vs F*ck, Douchebag vs Wanker, Dick vs Prat. I never got the hairy eyeball from the churchgoing folk if I used arse instead of ass. Go figure.

        “Gettin’ on my tits” and “going tit’s up” are two I’ve added to my own arsenal of expressions along with Miss Jane’s “Well, honk my hookers!” when delighted with something. Can’t get enough boob humor… pardon, I mean humour!

        ETA: Dara, Numpty should also be a noun describing something dirty that involves eating. See what you can come up with.

      • Dara says:

        Goodness @Nutty, I’m driving myself to distraction with your last suggestion – is it warm in here, or is it just me blushing? I used to be chaste and pure of thought, and then I discovered this place – which has been much more fun.

        @frisbee – I’ve decided, “like a fart in a colander” is my October Expression of the Month. Expect me to use it often.

  11. Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

    Well, I didn’t go to a boarding school and some of my best friends were my collegues at school, they’ve been for the past thirty years, so…

    • icerose says:

      my longest friends were those i went to drama college with-all that emoting makes you very close and supportive

  12. Greenieweenie says:

    Why are all these British actors so freaking privileged? Except the black ones, of course.

    • embertine says:

      Because the theatre circuit in the UK runs on the old boys’ network, just like our political system. It’s easier to train to be an actor and have time to go to endless auditions if Daddy’s funding one’s little flat in Chelsea.

      • icerose says:

        back in the seventies when you could still get full grants the spread across the class system was much better-so I Ihave friends across the board so you cannot just blame the public schools.Think Bill Nighy ,Pete Postlethwaite, Mark Strong -all northern actors , Micheal Caine ,KENNETH BRANNAGH (son of a joiner) Terence Stamp Peter O’toole but not so many actors from an ethnic back ground which was partly a sign of the times .I think if the grant system was still in place we would now have a more ethnicity with in the UK acting world -Having said that we d have etnic actors who attended Eton

    • neutral says:

      They aren’t. There are about half a dozen who come to prominence around the same time as we got a glut in the Govt. which is why all the snarking about them now.

      Gemma Arterton, Ben Wishaw, James McAvoy, David Morrissey, Matt Smith , Jenna Colman,
      Michelle Dockery…………………………………………..are not posh. I could go on.

      • GreenieWeenie says:

        I think I was thinking more of the men. I don’t think you really see too many privileged American actors. Tend to be working/middle class.

      • icerose says:

        Ben Whishaw was grammar school and middle class

    • Leah says:

      They are not all privileged, but i do agree that most of the ones who seem popular right about now are really posh.
      But its also this site, or should i say its readers? Tom Hiddlestons for instance is as popular as the kardashians on this site. That really isn’t the case elsewhere. This site is gonna cover whoever gets the most clicks i suppose. As long as people keep falling over themselves to comment on his posts we are going to have posts every time he goes out for a coffee. Which gives you a disprotionate idea of how important he is in the movie industry. Its more about a result of his tumblr fandom descending on this site ..haha..
      If say people cared about chiwetel as much around here, this site would have covered his new girlfriend (as extensively as say they did Hiddleston and Elisabeth olsen).

    • Lilacflowers says:

      Many of today’s popular US actors started as children (DiCaprio, Phoenix, JGL, Gosling, Reynolds, Michael B. Jordan) or have a family connection in the industry (RDJ, Penn, Sheen, Gyllenhaal, Brolin)

  13. Greenieweenie says:

    Let’s see, Benedict went to Harrow (right? That’s posh); Tom and Eddie to Eton; and isn’t Tom Hardy something upper crust? (sorry if I get those names wrong, not British).
    But Idris isn’t, and David Oyelowo isn’t and I don’t think Chiwetel Ejiofor is either (now I definitely got some spelling wrong).

    I mean, who’s left for leading men?

    • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

      Many white actors also don’t come from rich posh backgrounds, maybe you just don’t know them? Most people only know a few British actors…

      • GreenieWeenie says:

        probably not. It just strikes me as odd that I can name a handful of British actors (already a rarer breed of actor in Hollywood) who all had pretty privileged upbringing. I knew the Harrow School from where I lived before, internationally, so I had a sense of what kind of privilege that was.

        I don’t think I can name too many equally privileged American (male) actors. I mean…who? And I’m drawing from a much bigger pool. Which American Hollywood leading man-type of star went to a posh private school or had parents fund him through young adulthood?

        Big stars: Brad Pitt, Leo, Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise, Will Smith, Johnny Depp (or was), Robert Downey Jr–even recent ones like Chris Pratt, Bradley Cooper, Mark Wahlberg (?); Matt Damon/Ben Affleck. Probably Bradley Cooper is the most privileged. And he seemed solidly middle class.

      • GreenieWeenie says:

        just found out Cooper went to Germantown. That’s fairly privileged. The program I was teaching in used to work with them. But still, he worked as a doorman in a hotel. He graduated from Georgetown (so did my grandfather, and we were nothing but middle class). Somehow, I suspect Cumberbatch/Hiddleston/Redmayne never worked as doormen.

      • EN says:

        > I don’t think I can name too many equally privileged American (male) actors. I mean…who?

        It is because in the US being an actor is not considered a suitable profession for rich people. Acting in the US is “entertainment” (read cheap) vs. in Europe it is an “art” and respected .

        US has plenty of privileged kids, more so than the UK, but they go into finance and law.
        The same thing as a teacher in the US is a good-for-nothing-cheap-government-worker-who-couldn’t-get -hired-for-anything-else, while in Europe it is a very respectable middle class occupation.

      • EN says:

        > Somehow, I suspect Cumberbatch/Hiddleston/Redmayne never worked as doormen.

        I am pretty sure I read before that both Cumberbatch and Hiddleston both worked as waiters. I am not sure about Redmayne.
        But it is not “the thing” outside of the US and UK to make kids work low level jobs just because, when the family isn’t poor . The time considered better spent on education, self-improvement and future job related activities.

      • GreenieWeenie says:

        >US has plenty of privileged kids…but they go into finance and law.

        Yeah, probably right, in terms of old money (none of our money is all that old). New money, definitely not, haha. New money is synonymous with reality TV. The funny thing is despite Hollywood’s relatively low prestige, it generates the kind of wealth for actors that you can really only equal in those moneyed careers.

      • smyling says:

        Perhaps not more recently, but I can think of at least three American/Canadian acting families. Kirk Douglas was a famous actor, whose son Michael is equally well known. Martin Sheen had sons Charlie Sheen and Emilio Estevez follow in his footsteps. Canadian Donald Sutherland’s son Keifer was very well regarded in the 80’s as well.

        And not a great actor, but Jaden Smith dabbles in it, thanks to his family’s wealth.

      • meutrla says:

        Th Barrymore family, the Bridges, Coppolas, Fondas

      • Lilacflowers says:

        Tippie Hendron, Melanie Griffin, Dakota Johnson. Blythe Danner, Gwyneth Paltrow. The Roberts. The Hanks. The Aldas. The Anistons. The Arkins. Ron and Bryce Dallas Howard. Patty Duke and Sean and MacKenzie Astin. The Arquettes. The Coppolas and their various permutations into Shires, Cages, and Schwartzman. The Bergens. The Bridges. The Caans. The Carradines/Plimptons. The Clooney/Ferrers. Janet Leigh/Tony Curtis/Jamie Lee Curtis. The Cusacks. The Derns. The Elliiots. Eddie Fisher/Debbie Reynolds/Carrie Fisher. The Fondas. The Huttons. The Brodericks.

      • icerose says:

        that is because it is a different class system -having lived in both I would say one is based on your birth background whilst in Canada it was mainly based on moneyand the other on money but in the arts there is much more cross over and certainly was back in the grant system

    • LAK says:

      Chiwetel went to Dulwich.

      • GreenieWeenie says:

        I think I assumed not because he was recently talking about a glass ceiling in UK acting jobs and that’s why he came to the US. This might not be true in the UK, but glass ceilings here are susceptible to shatter in the face of relative privilege (see: Obama).

      • Leah says:

        Chiwetels not posh. He is from an educated middle class background.
        His father was a doctor but he was raised by a single mum ( a pharmacist) and went to dulwich on an academic scholarship if i am not mistaken.
        He also got a scholarship for Lamda. So while he went to the “right” academic institutions ( being familiar in that world surely helped him negotiate his way in the old boys club) he is not from that kind of posh well connected background such as Hiddleston and Redmayne where you grow up with the future prime ministers and royals of this country. Those guys are from that old money old boys club that are expected to rule this country. Its completely different level of power and privilege.

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        Thanks for the clarification, Leah.

      • meutrla says:

        @ Leah, so Tom’s dad did very well for himself from his background.

    • icerose says:

      Tom’s family on his Dad’s side was working class and he became a CEO of a very respected drug company which contributed to research in the the area of work where I was involved .He married into a very wealthy family with aristocratic connections and Tom was the first of his familyt to attend Eton-not every at Eton was born into poshness

      • Leah says:

        As you rightly pointed in Toms mother came from a very wealthy family with aristocratic connections. Same thing.

      • TotallyBiased says:

        Not exactly, Tom’s mother is third cousins once removed from the titled and wealthy branch of the family. The heritage is certainly there, but it was his originally working-class father that pushed for (and paid for) Eton. If they were going back and using family connections, he would have been sent to Harrow.

      • Leah says:

        I don’t get your point? Are you seriously suggesting harrow old boys aren’t privileged and well connected now?
        The point is he was raised in that upper class environment of privilege and wealth unlike some of the other actors that were mentioned and that sort of stuff does affect ones career in this country. We can nitpick about eton and harrow and which side of his family was the wealthy aristocratic one, but its kind of pointless.

      • TotallyBiased says:

        Yes, Leah, you did miss my point. Which was IF they were going back several generations and trying to connect with the posh, aristo side of the family–if they were leaning on his mother’s ‘blue blood’ ancestry–then he would have been at Harrow, because THAT’S his family tradition, only found if you go several generations back on her side.
        In early interviews when he first became a NAME due to Loki, he discusses his father’s desire to send him to Eton: how it was full of amazing opportunities (that presumably Dad didn’t have) and how excited and thrilled his dad was that he would be able to send his son there.

      • icerose says:

        that’s right -the bulk money had dissipated into one side of the family so although Tom’s mother did have have money it was not as much as some of his relatives-and he was proud that his son was the first too attend Eton.
        Also most of the the money did not come through the aristocratic side of the family but through the shipping industrtry

  14. neutral says:

    Digital Spy is embroidering a bit methinks. As PW was in a lower year than Tom and, as far as I know wasn’t into acting, I doubt they “bonded”.

    • p'enny says:

      they bonded over football, they played together and Tom referred a match they were in and he gave the red card to Prince W. They never spoke again 🙂

      • Vesta says:

        Bwahahaha 😈 ⚡⚡⚡ 👏👏👏

      • neutral says:

        Don’t know how much bonding actually happened! Certainly not if he gave him the red. Although I believe PW said nice to see you again at the War Horse Premier.

      • p'enny says:

        i don’t see Tom being knighted anytime soon :-p

      • icerose says:

        Tom was a house captain or something like and did regular refereeing and he said in an interview that Willy shouted at him along with the rest of his team when he gave him a card-pretty much the normal behaviour in Rugby

  15. Josefa says:

    Idk. I read the movie was too long in the beggining and they had to cut off a lot of parts, with Thor getting the worst part of it (which makes sense since he’s the least succesful Avenger). Do people really like Loki that much? I know Hiddles has his fanbase but everyone I talk to in real life thinks he’s an okay character played by a competent actor. No more, no less.

    The director’s cut will be released in DVD, right? I loved the movie, but it did feel somewhat incomplete.

    • MexicanMonkey says:

      Aside from Hiddleston’s own fandom, Loki is the most successful and liked Villian of the MCU, and I think they were hoping to change that with Spader’s Ultron (maybe that’s another reason why Loki was cut from the movie)
      But it’s not just the fangirls, it’s the movie fans and the critics and MCU fans. People really love Loki.

      • EN says:

        Loki, the character is amazing, period.
        I knew of him from Nordic myths based books long before Thor movies.
        Loki is very interesting. And Hiddleston did an excellent job portraying his duplicity.

    • NUTBALLS says:

      The DVD is out and Loki’s not in it.

      Loki is one of the most popular Marvel film characters. Just look at his reception at Comic Con 2013, when he made a surprise appearance. Probably the only one that’s more popular is Ironman. Even that might be debated at this point since some of us are tired of RDJ.

      Loki is what makes the cinematic version of Thor’s storyline interesting.

      • Josefa says:

        Oh yeah, I can agree Loki is the best character out of Thor. That being said, his competition isn’t very strong.

        I guess Loki really is popular then.

    • Anne tommy says:

      Thor Is fine. He’s not the least successful avenger as long as Hawkeye is around…

    • icerose says:

      i came to him through the Hollow Crown and had never watched a Marvel film-but i watched Thor it and the setting and and his Loki -I watched him in the Avengers and was impressed by his range.I only ever watch the films with Loki because I like to see how he changes the part each time .Otherwise i have no interest in Marvel at all.

  16. Hannah says:

    I saw his appearance on the graham Norton show last night on BBC iplayer. Oh dear, I can’t get over it. The term “luvie” was literally invented for him. He just loves to hear his own voice and be the centre of attention doesn’t he?

    • browniecakes says:

      It is kind of amazing to me that he lives alone and has for some time. You’d think someone that chatty would need a roommate, a sounding board, a ‘person in the room’. Maybe he gets by because he reads allot /does allot of research for his roles which would be chatty down time.

      • Hannah says:

        Maybe nobody wants to live with Him because he’s too exhausting? Imagine it.You probably won’t get a word in and he’s always looking For an oppertunity to do a song or dance or an impression. 😂
        As harmless as he seems he would probably be really annoying to live with with his constant need for attention.

      • Phoebe says:

        I think I could suffer through 🙂

      • NUTBALLS says:

        I bet an independent woman who carves out the right amount of time with The PuddleTom would not hit her limit. Especially if he makes it worth her while. He is a people-pleaser, so that could work in her favor if he know what she wants. 😉

      • Anne tommy says:

        Most people are not exactly the same at home as they are at work. His job is acting and then promoting the film. Of course he’s “on”.

      • EN says:

        Not to rain on anyone’s parade but most actors and creative people are extremely needy, always looking for validation.
        Also, generally they love to be around people and love spotlight, it is easy to start feeling neglected and used by them.
        Best to admire their work, and leave their personal lives alone. It is too much work to deal with these people on a personal basis.

      • icerose says:

        En I was married to a actor for 10 years -he was okay and i enjoyed his company but yes he needed feedback on his performances but not a great deal more than most people but he did talk a lot especially when he drunk to much. often Every one has personality traits that annoy others but if they are not hurting people why the need to go on about it.

    • meutrla says:

      @ Hannah, he might be a lot different when he is off duty and relaxed. After all people who we know actually know him and have worked with him haven’t got a bad word to say about him.

      • Hannah says:

        Look my post was meant to be humerous . You dragonflies are at me if I don’t agree he is perfect in every which way. Calm down it wasn’t that serious 😂
        @ annetommy I know about work vs private life but I am not in his private life so I can only judge from what I see.

        @EN not all actors are the same personality type. Some are very shy and introspective some like to be the life and soul of the party. On that show deniro and Tom represented the extreme opposites of actor types. I have seen interviews with the young Daniel day Lewis and he was quiet and seemed introspective. I never confuse someone’s work with their private person anyway. Tom is a good actor Whose work I appreciate.
        @ meutria who said he isn’t a lovely person? even Chris hemsworth pretty much said Tom talks a lot. Doesn’t mean he’s not a good guy. You can be be both a nice guy and someme who talks an awful lot and loves attention. That’s our Tommyanna 😂

  17. koko says:

    Honestly I wasn’t impressed with any of the “dream” sequences and his role being cut didn’t bother me. Frankly his appearance in Thor’s wouldn’t have made it any better but I understand his explanation on being cut.

    I attended private school but we didn’t board there as it was close by but I think for some the friends you make in any school setting can become some of the longest, most loyal friends you ever have.

  18. A. Key says:

    I don’t understand the boarding school system at all. And by that I mean I cannot comprehend it in the least. There are no boarding schools in my country and the idea of sending off your prepubescent child anywhere alone seems pure cruelty to me.

    I know Victorian aristocracy shipped off their kids to boarding schools and left the breastfeeding and the upbringing to the nannies but I thought that absurd cold harsh tradition died with the industrial revolution.
    Guess not.

    • embertine says:

      When I was a kid it was pretty standard for officers (officers, NOT soldiers) to send their children to boarding school to ensure continuity of education when you move round every two years. I know that the fees subsidy for the Army was abolished not long after I left, and I think that culturally things have changed also.

    • EN says:

      And here I keep thinking Americans baby their kids too much ( of course most Americans vehemently disagree) , and so many never learn responsibility of being an adult.
      They go to college at 19 and they are so not ready. It is scary what is going on in the US colleges, because many kids weren’t raised responsibly, weren’t taught to act and think like adults. It is a process, you have to start demanding kids to behave like adults somewhere around 12-13 y.o. They can’t be a kid at 18 y.o. and adult at 19 y.o., maturing is a process.
      I guess it is a cultural thing,

      • A.Key says:

        Well I’m not American so I can’t say what’s it like for American kids, but from my experience, most people are still children at the age of 18. Regardless of boarding school experience or not. That includes the British people I’ve met throughout my life.
        Boarding schools mostly just traumatized the kids I’ve met, but they sure didn’t turn a teenage child magically into a wise responsible mature adult.
        Also, most rich young adults from the UK who come to spend the summer here as tourists behave like the worst spoilt brats and babies.
        Correct me if I’m wrong, but only the UK and some of its ex-colonies have the boarding school system? It doesn’t really exist as a tradition anywhere else in the world.

      • EN says:

        > Correct me if I’m wrong, but only the UK and some of its ex-colonies have the boarding school system?

        Military schools exist in many places, and grew out of orphanages for kids of men killed in wars.
        Also, many countries have a boarding system of schools for talented kids – in sports or sciences.
        Boarding schools are pretty common through most of Europe, I think, And here in the US we also have them for the elite and academic elite.
        In big countries if you are looking to give really talented kids stellar education you have to go with boarding schools because it is simply not possible to reach everyone outside of the 2-3 biggest cities. The same goes for sports.

      • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

        Portugal has boarding schools, not many, but it does…

      • A.Key says:

        Interesting.

        I don’t think boarding schools are common across Europe though. They may exist but they aren’t common nor are they part of the country’s tradition.

        Apart from the UK, the overwhelming majority of kids in Europe do not go to boarding schools.

      • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

        Oh and in Portugal, even state schools have dorms. There are certain regions with small towns and of course small schools, and if a kid wants to study arts, for instance, and the only school in the region that provides that course is 80 or 100 km away, the school provides bedrooms in dorms (but these are already 15 year old kids..)

      • icerose says:

        well i would recommend single parenthood-my kids grew up and were very independent-it is all about your relationship with and how you weather the storms

      • Mary-Alice says:

        Nope. Girls colleges are best in Switzerland. We have boarding schools for all kids athletes in my country which is what I did. You miss the fact that many kids involved in sports or arts, for example, do board. One of my close friends left for the USA, to a tennis academy, in his early teens. Early teens. One of my best friends left to board in a ballet school at 11. I went to board in a sports school at 9. Girls rrom my family generally go to Switzerland at about 11. We are fine, in fact, it was lots of fun.

      • LAK says:

        Switzerland/France is where most people go to board in Europe. Heck swiss boarding finishing schools are world reknown and where everybody upper crust person [or if you can afford the fees] sends their daughters to be finished.

      • A. Key says:

        Oh so all boarding schools across the globe are usually super expensive?

        I understand now why most kids don’t board then!

        Still, I’d never send my kid to one, even if I could afford it.

        Living in a dorm once you’re 15 or older is one thing, but sending a 7 year old off alone is another.

      • TotallyBiased says:

        I went to boarding school here in the US, and I’m from a lower middle class background. But even Phillips Academy Andover has scholarship students. At 16, I started a year later then the others, so socially I never caught up. And just going to an elite boarding school is not enough to leave one well-connected for life, the top guys (boys and girls) knew each other from previous schools and vacationing in the same places for years.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        TB, when I hear Andover, I’m reminded of Harold Parker. 🙂

  19. et alors says:

    Son of a gun, why are the comments I’ve submitted about Tom’s appointment as the founding BFI Ambassador not posting? Anyway, check out the @BFI Twitter account for more detail. He’s giving his inaugural speech tonight at the Luminous gala.

  20. Allegra says:

    From news from @TomLinay:
    I SAW THE LIGHT, starring Tom Hiddleston as Hank Williams, is released in the UK on 5 February 2016.

  21. Lilacflowers says:

    What time is the gala? Shouldn’t there be tuxedo pictures soon?

  22. Phoebe says:

    He looks gorgeous except I don’t like the collar of his tux and his damn tie is all wrong and wonky- all things I could have fixed for him if he only knew…

    • Dara says:

      @Phoebe, I’ve never been a huge fan of winged-collar tuxedo shirts, but he does look really good. I can’t look too long while I’m at work, but this will make for some nice viewing later on from the comfort of my sofa.

      The Periscope app had a brief interview with Tom on the red carpet. Hopefully it’s replayable later…

    • neutral says:

      I don’t like wing collars either, but apparently it is the done thing to have bow ties slightly askew.

    • et alors says:

      @Phoebe, according to GQ, a bow tie should be a little crooked. It drives my OCD self a little crazy, but Tom’s ties always look like that.

      • Phoebe says:

        Hmmm, really? It drives me crazy too! But shouldn’t it be tied so that each side is the same size and has the same shape- his left side is smaller and not as sharp as the right. And yes, clearly I have time to stare at these pictures for that long LOL

      • et alors says:

        The lack of perfection is to indicate that it’s hand-tied, apparently. Plus, it gives people an excuse to go up and straighten it out. 😉

        I don’t even have to stare at pictures to notice a crooked bow tie because it’s always the first thing I focus on.

      • Solanacaea (Nighty) says:

        Nevermind the bowtie.. He looks perfect.. God, the things I’d do to that man…

      • Phoebe says:

        Agreed Solanacaea, first thing would be to just take the bow-tie off completely. Now where to put it instead….

    • Lilacflowers says:

      I apologize profusely for the state of the tie, collar, and lapel. All were perfection when we got in the car. Tie slightly askew, as it should be. But then … well .., uhm … well, private things needed attention!

    • j.eyre says:

      *Gah* I am positively mad for winged tip collars on tuxedo shirts. It’s so gorgeously Gatsby – all of my Fitzgerald fantasies are being kicked into overdrive.

      I am assuming he is in a RL Purple Label tux and Mr. Lauren is very particular about how any tie should be tied. These photos have made me so very happy, Dragonflies – thank you.

      • et alors says:

        Never mind. I thought I had read that his tux was a McQueen, but it was just speculation.

      • j.eyre says:

        Oh it very well could be McQueen, et alors, I am making an assumption based on how much he has been repping Ralph Lauren of late – pure conjecture on my part.

        Lovely whoever poured him into it, n’est pas?

      • et alors says:

        It’s a very nice fit, j.eyre, especially as he doesn’t seem to be tugging at his pants constantly like he was doing at the BAFTAs earlier this year. Might be a bit snug in the thighs, but I don’t think anyone is going to complain.

    • Gingerly says:

      He looks great. Period.

  23. et alors says:

    Happy Sad Confused podcast with Josh Horowitz and GDT. Josh is teased in the beginning about Tom being his favorite person in the world, and GDT jokes about how Tom wanted to show off his rear end.

    “Can I be naked for the breakfast scene?”

    “No, Tom, you gotta wait for the love scene.”

    “Can I be naked in the waltz?”

    “NO, TOM. Wait for the love scene.”

    http://happysadconfused.wolfpop.com/audio/39812/guillermo-del-toro

  24. neutral says:

    Given all the air miles Tom has clocked up in the last month, I bet he will be glad to get back to filming for a rest.

  25. neutral says:

    and there’s more:

    http://www.heyuguys.com/bfi-luminous-gala-interviews/

    Don’t know if I’m allowed to post this, sorry if not.

    • NUTBALLS says:

      I think those reporters jumped the gun on the Thor director news. The Concords dude is in negotiations with Marvel and hence why Tom was questioning if it was confirmed…

      • Allegra says:

        Gosh, Tom has 3 movies this year and that guy only cares about Thor?

      • Dara says:

        Was it me, or did Tom sound a wee bit miffed that perhaps it was a done deal and yet no one had reached out? You’d think the actors would be the first to know after the director and studio. Maybe it’s not as confirmed as those reporters thought it was.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        It would make sense if he was a kiwi, which was my first thought when I heard his accent. I am known for mixing that one up with other British accents though!

      • jammypants says:

        I wish someone would ask him about The Night Manager.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        @Dara, I think if he was miffed, it would be that he wasn’t being asked about the purpose of the event he was attending, the “ambassadorship,” or any of the three movies he has to promote but instead, an interviewer was trying to catch him on something about Marvel. He still didn’t sound convinced. He was also being asked questions about Bond because of what was basically a stunt from that BBC reporter.

      • DT says:

        That guy’s definately British not a Kiwi.

    • Allegra says:

      Yes, you can post links.
      Here another Red Carpet interview:

      youtube.com/watch?v=21fPqWacmlk