Russell Brand blames split with Katy Perry on ‘the undulated nature of fame’

wenn22625545

I didn’t know comedian John Bishop had his own talk show? I love Bishop – I’m so excited to have this information. Anyway, he does and recently interviewed Russel Brand who spoke about what happened in his marriage with Katy Perry. I find Brand wildly entertaining as an artist and I like a couple of Perry’s songs, but they both fall under the “don’t scratch too far below the surface” category for me. That includes their relationship. I know they have taken stabs at mud-slinging and feeble attempts at playing nice. But for all our theories, we don’t know what happened, exactly. In the Bishop interview, Brand attempts to contextualize it and, to his credit, he is diplomatic but still doesn’t assume responsibility. According to Brand, it was her fame that killed the love story, not his open disdain for everything she stood for.

Russell Brand still has a special place in his heart for ex-wife Katy Perry. The comedian, 41, reflected on his short-lived marriage to the pop star, 32, in an interview for the W Channel’s John Bishop: In Conversation With on Thursday, March 30.

Noting that Perry was “obviously very, very occupied and very busy” and that he was “occupied and busy [though] not to the same degree,” Brand said it was difficult to safeguard their relationship from “external influences.”

“There’s the declaration that we are together, in front of people. There was a ceremony, people are invited — that is the point of a wedding ceremony — but in the end there is a kind of intimacy where you acknowledge it’s just the two of us,” he explained. “And I suppose perhaps we intuitively or explicitly, I don’t know, understood that we’d better protect this thing.” 

Unfortunately for their marriage, the pressures of fame ultimately took a toll. “Now, like, obviously the marriage didn’t last for a very long time, and I think that is to do with the undulated nature of fame and that living in those conditions and what was happening,” Brand continued.

[From US]

From the start, they were very different people in very different places. But that’s just it – it was that way from the start. It sounds like when Brand took those vows, he shifted his view from really digging his S.O. to realizing they were a legally bound pair, like he saw her through a different lens. By example, Brand said to Bishop, “But it meant, I think, that [for] the sanctimony of marriage, which is a very private thing really… the declaration that we are together in front of people… in the end there is an intimacy that you acknowledge ‘right, there’s just the two of us’…I supposed we perhaps—intuitively or explicitly I don’t know—understood that we better protect this thing.” I know couples like this – they woke up the day after they married and saw the person next to them in a whole new way. It’s poor timing but not uncommon.

Later in the interview, Brand said of Perry, “I still feel very warm towards her. I feel like, when I hear about her or see her, ‘Awe, there’s that person. There’s that person in the world.’” This I believe. I think Brand has had another shift in his vision after becoming a father and the fact that he can look on Perry with affection is nice. It would be lovely if Perry could do the same but I’m not too high on her right now so I won’t hold my breath.

wenn3086737

wenn5640454

wenn3302351

Photo credit: Getty Images and WENN Photos

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Russell Brand blames split with Katy Perry on ‘the undulated nature of fame’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MamaHoneyBadger says:

    “Undulated” nature of fame? Half the time I’m not sure even he knows what he’s saying. He walks that fine line between brilliance and insanity.

  2. mary watkins says:

    I can’t get over the fact how he dumped her or rather said he wanted to divorce her over the phone. He knew going into the marriage that she was a high profile pop star and knew what that entailed. I’m not putting all the blame on him either because she was in the marriage as well but I think they really should have just went with the flow a little longer before getting married so they both knew the logistics of being together.

    • Beth says:

      They definetly should have waited a while before actually getting married. Why so fast? Breaking up with someone on the phone is mean and wimpy. Did he not have the guts to do it in person?

    • Bridget says:

      If I can point out, that point at the end, she went on vacation without him and staged a bunch of photos of her playing in the surf by herself. She was trying to provoke an answer out of him, which she got – the text message breakup.

  3. Stella says:

    Sanctimony of marriage?

  4. Shambles says:

    I love you forever, Rusty, but come on. All of your existential undulation is all well and good, but you must bear some responsibility here. You liked her tits. You wanted to bang her the night you met her. You were wildly physically attracted to the woman, and you didn’t bother to find out anything about her that went beyond the tip of your penis. And then you married her, and you realized you were legally bound to this person, and you started to get to know things about her. After you were legally bound to this person.

    But I struggle with this too. Being a person who’s all into meditation and all that woojie stuff, you have to remember that you still have flaws and you still have to take respobsility for them.

  5. Dani says:

    He needs to sit down and just shhhh. And take a shower.

  6. poppy says:

    wow what a word salad spinner.
    maybe he wasn’t fully formed as a whole person, being freshly sober. or maybe he couldn’t deal with her fame or her whatever. just say “i couldn’t deal with X because i didn’t know how and i didn’t know what i was doing at the time because i was still learning about myself without mind altering substances.”
    nobody would have a problem with that.
    way to not take ANY responsibility.

  7. DystopianDance says:

    He falls into the “Perfectly Correct” Gestapo category. I know he fronts as “spiritual and yoga” or whatever, but he’s actually critical and bullying. This is a difficult category of person to initially detect, and many women fall for this type of emotional abuser. At first they come off as “self-aware” or whatever. But gradually they erode anything about their partner that isn’t “healthy” enough, or “kind” enough”, picking apart any digression. If you really listen to him he’s superficial and hatelfuly critical; of course he “word salads” and blames HER once again for some ubiquitous thing- “undulating fame”? Yep. He’ll never change.

  8. Ashley Nate says:

    Typical smelly narcissist
    Forever blaming someone, and refusing to take responsibilities.
    He knows a lot of the public will never respect him after that ‘divorce by text’. It really showed his true colors and cowardice. He’s been trying to hard to win back the public ever since that mess went down.

  9. Bridget says:

    These two were such a bad pairing. He, sober and obnoxiously acerbic AND needed to be the center of attention – she, dim party girl who was a mega star on a cereer high who wanted to be in a relationship but not settle down. They made each other miserable. Their breakup was terrible too, when she went to Hawaii without him and tried to send him a message through the press of how much fun she was having, but it backfired when his response was to break up via text. Neither of these people belong in a relationship.

  10. Ange says:

    I just remember her looking embarrassed every time he opened his mouth to say something. Never understood how they made it to marriage, such a huge mismatch. Well I kinda can, tits like Shambles said and she probably thought he was worldly despite everything.

  11. MrsBadBob says:

    He is so in love with himself, he never should have married.