Oct 9
'09
Ralph Lauren ad features model Photoshopped to look insect thin

1008ralphlaurenad

Given that many magazines are starting to use regular-sized women as models (I’m not going to say “plus-size,” because while they are larger than your average model, they’re not plus-sized for your average person), it seems like Ralph Lauren is rather backward thinking when it comes to their own model selection. I’m not going to slam a fashion brand for choosing a thin model, but not only did Ralph Lauren do that, but they Photoshopped at least 20 lbs off already extremely thin Filippa Hamilton. She looks like a preying mantis. To make matters worse, instead of taking responsibility for their actions, Ralph Lauren legally attacked the websites that were posting the image in order to have a discussion.

Just as the fashion world seemed to be coming around to promoting realistic portrayals of women, designer Ralph Lauren has come under fire promoting an unhealthy aesthetic of dangerously thin women.

Bloggers have slammed the legendary American designer for an ad that shows model Filippa Hamilton in what appears to be a heavily altered photo. The ad in question appeared on Boing Boing, with a blogger noting “Dude, her head’s bigger than her pelvis.” Indeed, Hamilton, whose thin body appears to be in keeping with the fashion industry aesthetic of tall and incredibly thin, looks emaciated in the photo.

But the fashion house did not take well to the criticism and slammed the site, claiming that the use of the image was a copyright infringement. Boing Boing shot back saying it was fair use because the reproduction was being used for purposes such as “criticism, comment, news reporting etc.”

Still, despite the legal issues, we were concerned by the imagery in the photo. The message of a model who is already probably less than 115 pounds having 20 pounds digitally removed from her body is disconcerting at best. After Glamour magazine and other fashion sites have been praised for the use of plus size models, some are arguing that Ralph Lauren is moving backward.

[From Fox 411]

The photo originally appeared on the website PhotoshopDisasters. Ralph Lauren filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act against the blog in order to force the entries to be immediately removed, which their ISP (and most ISPS) automatically do when a DMCA is filed. Because why fess up to your poor decisions when you can blame someone else? Eventually Ralph Lauren admitted wrongdoing yesterday.

“For over 42 years we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman’s body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the caliber of our artwork represents our brand appropriately.”

[From Extra]

What a great way to make a medium-sized problem so much worse. It’s inexcusable to try to show that a healthy “ideal” woman should look like she has a – what size would that be, a 15 inch waist? Instead of saying, “Yeah, our bad, we’re ridiculously superficial (obviously) and don’t give a crap how unrealistic and unhealthy our expectations are” they try to distract with a bunch of legal b.s. claiming we don’t even have the right to look at and comment upon the image. Ralph Lauren used to be a nice brand with a reasonably classy image. This is just pure trash.

Here’s what Filippa Hamilton (and her waist) looked like in previous Ralph Lauren ads.

Written by JayBird

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Advertising, Body image, Fashion, Models, Weight

Credit: WENN.com featured links
- Diet secrets from Jessica Alba's nutritionist [Hollywood Life]
- Hef's twins have beautiful hair [D-Listed]
- The Twilight kids: more "Hills" than cool [Lainey Gossip]
- Ellen premieres on Idol tonight [Popeater]
- Cute photos of Anna Paquin and Steven Moyer exercising [Popsugar]
- JWoww wants bigger implants [Celebslam]
- Look at Handy Manny now [Go Fug Yourself]

58 Responses to “Ralph Lauren ad features model Photoshopped to look insect thin”

  1. What the hell is that thing?…honey…where’s the fly swatter?!?!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. I don’t get Ralph Lauren…why would they even WANT to make her look like that?

    I wouldn’t have realized that was the same girl if you hadn’t mentioned it. She looks wonderful in the old ads.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. I really don’t understand what the point of this is. It looks abnormal. NO ONE normal could look like this. What is the point?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. Praise St. Angie!
    Praise St. Angie!:

    wow, a human bobble-head.

    looks like they put her head on someone else’s body.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. I never got into the smack down on skinny models, but this is ridiculous. WTF does this say to teenage girls? For years I said the image of an ideal woman that (most) American men have is an anorexic with a boob job. As unfortunate as that image is, it is attainable (although perhaps not desirable). This image is not even attainable (nor desirable, but that’s beside this point). It’s just a big set-up for “You aren’t good enough”. Do any of you buy Lauren? (I’m pretty much a CK person mostly because that’s my easiest access.) I’m curious if Lauren vanity-sized his clothes. I will guarantee that CK has over the past several years, but their sizes still run smaller than, for example, going into Macy’s and trying on the same size. It would be ironic if Lauren puts a preying mantis on his cover and then vanity sizes his clothes.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. That is beyond fake looking. The proportion of her head to her body is hysterical. Her HAIR is twice as wide as her waist! Also, they have given her the hips of an 11 year old boy.

    As for the clothes, those jeans look like something my niece in elementary school would wear.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. It looks like a bad drawing. Seriously, how did this get approved by the art director over there?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. The funny bit is that it’s SO BAD. It makes the outfit look terrible, and the model inhuman. I almost wish they were running the ad, because they clearly don’t understand that they went too far. Maybe if their sales dropped off entirely they would get the point.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. Karen Carpenter was the first thing that popped into my mind when I saw it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. @ Birdie- agreed
    Is Ralph Lauren trying to make some sort of statement? If so, they missed the mark.
    Just outright gross.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. Looks disgusting and completely inhuman.

    This is not the image of a female that I want my daughter growing up and seeing.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. the original kate
    the original kate:

    she looks like a funhouse mirror.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. wanna know what’s really sad? i have an eating disorder and even this looks absolutely disgusting to me. she looks like she’s 70 pounds here.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. EWWWWW!!!!!!!!! That is just so beyond creepy and disturbing i dont even know what to call it….if ralph lauren will make me look like THAT count me out!!! she has a beautiful face but dear god….that is just f*cking revolting what they did to her body. not even a skeleton could possibly be that narrow!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  15. What on earth??? I can’t even get offended over this- it just looks so bizarre! It’s more funny than anything…and I’m fairly sure that even the most image-obsessed teenage girls would be more likely to shake their heads than try to look like that. Definitely ridicule-worthy, unless RL was trying to provoke discussion of over-use of airbrushing and image altering. But apparently that’s not the case.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  16. This photo that has been altered. I studied figure drawing and anathomy. The portions are totally off, especially the ribcage. I think the photo was altered to prompt discussion and to sell the line.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  17. I think I have a couple pairs of Ralph Lauren jeans that fit my fat ass, lol. They do make “plus” sizes, that’s the irony…

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  18. Someone lied to the photographer that he can take pictures and RL forgot wearing his glasses while looking at THIS!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  19. If I was this chick I would have been ouraged they shrunk her body so much. She looks like an extra-terrestrial! Her hips can’t be that small in size ratio to her shoulders. It’s impossible.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  20. And something else… If you really want to see something tastefully insane, take a look at Alexander McQueen’s spring 2010 collection! It will blow your mind!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  21. what’s next, are they going to photoshop Marge Simpson’s playboy spread to make her more “doable”?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  22. it’s the worst photoshop job i never saw
    no one can think she’s real as that
    it’s more funny or a sarcastic pix on photoshopped model

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  23. I say boycott Ralph Lauren

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  24. Makes the head look huge and masculine and the face horsey. Fail!

    Ralph Lauren, originally Raul Lipschitz from the Bronx is doing women no favors.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  25. She looks like Olive Oil. Why don’t they just start having cartoon artists draw their collections on Olive Oil if they think she has such a great bod?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  26. She looks like she was made out of pipecleaner and bent into position. Totally gross and fake-looking. It’s sad and pathetic that there are a lot of people who obsess and starve to achieve a frame like that.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  27. I can’t stop laughing…..

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  28. I wouldn’t say Filippa is “extremely” thin…she’s thin, but she’s not as thin as your average runway model these days. And she’s been doing RL ads for years.

    And, I’m gonna say it…I don’t understand why anyone would be upset over this picture. It’s so ludicrous, it makes me chuckle. No one could possibly look like that, and if they wanted to, they need a good smack to the back of the head.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  29. The hell? My first thought was that the pic was a joke because it looks so utterly ridiculous. Epic fail.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  30. *wipes tear out of eye corner* Rachel Zoe would be SO PROUD!

    Yuck.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  31. This is so outrageous I just went to Ralph Laurens website and sent them an email declaring I have made the decision to shop for other labels- those which don’t have a subversive message about my sixed 8 frame. For anyone else whod like to weigh in with the compant directly, here is the email address given on their website: CustomerAssistance@RalphLauren.com

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  32. When I was looking at this cover it occured to me that not only were they dissing women in general (not thin enough) but the model in specific by saying in effect that not even her slender body which they had used before less retouched was thin enough for them.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  33. I heard this ad was found in Japan, and that the image-doctoring had been done there. You won’t see this image in other countries.

    …not that it makes it right mind you, but this wouldn’t become an issue over there.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  34. IM finding it more and more morbid the thinner these women get. They remind me of those women in the camps during WWII! When will this maddness end???! This thin thing is psychotic, I’m not saying be obese but for God sake look at her!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  35. everyone knows real men like a little meat on the bone….she couldn’t charm a junkyard dog.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  36. Get over it people. It’s called art and pushing the boundaries. Who wants to buy magazines and see ‘ordinary’ size 10 jane?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  37. This is first of all a huge insult to the gorgeous Filippa Hamilton. She’s a beautiful model with some serious chic attitude which is rare to find.
    Her body is very special too: she has a tiny waist and rather large (in comparison to other models of her standard) hips (she’s not at all close to the thinness of some nowadays runway models). Her small waist is also very high set on her body (it’s almost closer to her breasts than to her hips).
    She has some nice real boobs too… :-)

    They simply photoshopped some “extra” waist (and possibly enhanced the breasts) which was completely unnecessary! And makes her look awful.
    And it must have been an expensive Photoshop job as it is a checked shirt!

    Worst part is: Ralph Lauren didn’t need to go to these extremes. They sell pretty well and have their trademark blazers going off the shelves in every single size. This is actual a bad publicity stunt for them as they make rather wearable clothes that suit many body types. I’m surprised by this ad.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  38. Lol, Michelle. You stoopid.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  39. Wow. Good call. She really looks like an insect. They kept the boobs though!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  40. Agree with kathie (#35). If I were that model, I would be insulted. Then again, this IS the fashion industry, so she`s probably used to feeling she`s never thin enough.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  41. Michelle: As an art student, I’m appalled and offended that you consider this “art”. There is nothing artistic about this. It’s just ridiculous.

    I wouldn’t say that they’ve made her look emaciated, though. They’ve just really screwed up her proportions, making her look freakish. If you cut off the picture below the ribcage, her body looks “normal” as far as models go. But the fact that her top half is so much bigger than her bottom half makes her look like a dude.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  42. They made her look like a freak!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  43. First it was heroin chic, now introducing, alien chic..

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  44. This is really really obviously some moron who doesn’t know how to photoshop or a joke.

    I highly doubt anyone with a functioning brain would think that Ralph Lauren would actually try to put that image out as something idyllic and beautiful.

    It is terrible, terrible Photoshop and that’s all. You cannot look at that and think “Gee, that is a beautiful, normal body” without being mentally disturbed.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  45. Otondieu, as an art student I would have expected you to not be narrow minded about what constitutes art. Do all you people think they were trying to ‘perfect’ her body? Give RL some credit! The joke is on you if you take time to be offended. You all need to love your own bodies and teach your kids to do the same. Americans love blaming the media and fashion houses for your insecurities.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  46. never mind her body… that outfit is stupid

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  47. Its disgusting and its ridiculous- then again, Who in the hell is buying Ralph Lauren Jeans anyway?? “OOOH those jeans with the granny patches will look soo good with my awesome Pink Polo Shirt, layered over my kelly Green Polo shirt. Let’s hope this costs RL tons of sales.

    No one should be following this example.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  48. Michelle, I agree with you…I just wrote an essay about folks blaming designers and models for a writing class.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  49. Oh Dear God! This is freak! She like a Bratz doll.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  50. I so “get” these big fashion designers’ angle… skinny women use less materials; hence more garments can be made at rip-off prices. Oh yeah, it is always about the money… tell me I’m lying! Now, where did I lay those yummy potato chips?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  51. You think the Ralph Lauren ad is bad. Take a look at the Ann Taylor website, http://www.anntaylor.com

    The models are missing ribs, hips, and pocket flaps. Many of the photos are so photoshopped that the bodies under the clothing look deformed.

    I think more of these companies need to be exposed for doing crap like this. I understand if they put clothes pins in the back of models to make the clothing appear to fit better. I don’t agree with it, but I understand what they are doing. But then, after the fact, shaving parts out of the photos is just asinine.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  52. i think ralph lauren is a gay bastard for doing this to a beautiful woman he should be shot

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply

Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy

Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

 
 
 
Legal Disclaimer