Marius Borg Hoiby was convicted of 34 offenses & sentenced to four years in prison

As an American, I know full well that I have no room to talk about the many injustices of the American criminal justice system. But I’m consistently stunned by the short sentences handed down in Europe for violent crimes. For example, this situation with Norway’s royal stepson Marius Borg Hoiby, the son of Crown Princess Mette-Marit. Marius is 29 years old and he’s been a violent POS for many years. In 2024, he was finally arrested for rape and assault. Over the course of a year, Norwegian prosecutors piled on dozens of other charges for all of his other crimes, like stalking, harassment and assault of multiple women. Marius was prosecuted on 40 criminal charges, he was denied special release to visit his ill mother, and today, he was convicted on many of those charges. His sentence? Four years in prison. Only four years???

Marius Borg Høiby, the son of Norway’s crown princess, has been sentenced to four years in prison after being found guilty of several offences, including two counts of rape. The verdict was handed down by the Oslo district court on Monday morning, nearly three months since Høiby’s closely watched six-week trial.

Judge Jon Sverdrup Efjestad convicted him of assaulting his former girlfriend Nora Haukland, the only victim to have been publicly named. He was ordered to pay Haukland and three other women compensation, and was also sentenced to a two-year restraining order against one of his victims.

Høiby faced 40 charges, including four counts of rape and assault, several breaches of restraining orders, as well as drug and driving offences. One charge of violating a restraining order was later overturned.

He was found guilty of 34 offences – including two counts of rape, serious bodily harm, abuse in close relationships, physical assault, threats, six counts of sexually offensive behaviour and three counts of violating a restraining order. He was acquitted of two counts of rape and two counts of violating a restraining order.

The 29-year-old had pleaded not guilty to the most serious accusations against him, including rape, while admitting to ‌some lesser offences. All parties have two weeks to appeal against the verdict. Høiby attended court by video link from Ila prison, which his defence said was for health reasons. He was not visible on the video link.

Prosecutors had asked the court to sentence him to seven years and seven months in prison, while defence lawyers had argued that he should be acquitted of the rape allegations and receive no more than 18 months for the offences to which he had admitted.

The rape charges involve four women between 2018 and 2024. In each case, the women are alleged to have been sleeping or heavily incapacitated. Addressing one of the charges, for which Høiby was found guilty of raping a woman in the basement of the crown prince and princess’s residence at Skaugum in December 2018, Efjestad said of the video evidence: “She has closed her eyes, lies in the same position over time and shows no reactions to touch or stimulation. There are no sounds or movements that indicate she is awake. This is also supported by the victim’s own reaction, when she was shown recordings during interrogation, where she stated that she had not been aware of what happened.”

[From The Guardian]

Again, prosecutors had SO MUCH evidence, and Marius was convicted of 34 offenses, including some of the most violent crimes to women. And he only got four years in prison. That’s insane. He’s a convicted serial predator and violent misogynist – four years in prison won’t change him. Marius’s lawyers are still trying to convince the courts to release Marius long enough to visit his mother too, but I really hope that doesn’t happen.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

45 Responses to “Marius Borg Hoiby was convicted of 34 offenses & sentenced to four years in prison”

  1. Magdalena says:

    The sad thing is, Kaiser, that in Scandinavian countries (I’m mainly thinking of Sweden though), people get far longer prison sentences and more stringent punishment for tax offences than they do for physical assaults, rape and even murder. A *lot* of emphasis goes into “rehabilitating” (and trying to understand and granting compassion to) those who commit the last three, whereas the book is thrown at anyone who is suspected of “fiddling” with taxes. There are running jokes about this. The fact that his lawyers requested 18 months vs the 7 years+ that the prosecution requested says a lot. I think the maximum sentence for murder, for example, is usually 10 years, but murderers seldom get that and are usually granted some form of release years earlier. Not so much consideration for tax offenders.

    Similarly, victims of crime seldom receive the compensation they deserve, it’s usually a pittance compared to what victims in some so-called developed countries do (I also think that compensation is woefully low in the UK for many crimes).

    • ArtHistorian says:

      It is true in Denmark as well. Financial crimes are punished harder than sexual crimes against women. It suck so much and it just yet another feature of life under capitalist patriarchy – even in countries that have good track records on gender issues in other cases. Crimes against people, especially violent ones, ought to weigh heavier than financial crimes against corporations or the State (tax crimes).

    • Alice says:

      Canada is much, much worse than any European country, and USA. What’s happening in Canada is unjustifiable, especially in the light of the violent crimes in question. It’s one of the main reasons why our kids won’t stay in Canada .

  2. Digital Unicorn says:

    I hope the women of Norway are appalled by the leniency of this sentence – the charges were v serious and there were MULTIPLE charges of the same offence (4 counts of rape). Come on, its like a slap in the wrist given that there are likely other victims out there who haven’t come forward. He’s a serial rapists and abuser of women – he’s a monster who should be locked up. Its appalling that he’s using addiction and MH issues as an excuse for doing what he did – he knows right from wrong but did it anyway as he knew it would get covered up and he’d get away with it as Mummy and Daddy would fix it for him.

    MM and Haakkon need to take responsibility for the monster they raised – he clearly learned this toxic attitude towards women from someone and they are his parents. His mother in particular seemed to enable his objectification of women (nude women calendar at 15!!) – questions should be asked about the kind of home he and his siblings have been raised in.

    Rehabilitating him will be difficult and often these people refuse to acknowledge what they did let alone that it was wrong – he denied it in the face of evidence (his own videos). That alone tells us that he felt entitled to do what he did and he see’s women as objects for his gratification. He will always be a danger to women and society.

    I hope the courts don’t release him to go stay with his parents as he has proven repeatedly that he won’t abide by any restrictions put upon him by the courts – he repeatedly broke restraining orders to harass and threaten his victims. His parents have shown they won’t manage him, they prefer to take him on luxury holidays rewarding him for his actions rather than make him take responsibility for them. He’s a typical bully – acts the big tough man to those who he deems weaker than him but cries for Mummy when faced with people who won’t let him bully them.

    • Magdalena says:

      I agree with this wholeheartedly.

    • irisrose says:

      They moved him to a high security prison near the family home of Skaugum a few days ago. The Oslo prison he was in is being torn down (as I understand it). He was seen, uncuffed, being walked into a hospital to stay overnight last night or the night before. Because he was what, having a panic attack over his possible sentencing?

      This psychopath was also created by his biofather, who has been an active part of his life and co-parenting him all along. The one who married extremely wealthy and may have been the one funding his lifestyle. You know, the convicted drug dealer Mette-Marit had a drunk/high one-night stand with when she was cheating on her drug dealing live-in boyfriend.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Ah I didn’t know that the bio father was involved in his life – explains a lot. I know his maternal grand father is also v problematic so it seems he didn’t have any positive male role models in his life. Haakon may have tried but he would look naive compared to the ‘gangsta’ father/grandfather which is the lifestyle he has been trying to emulate.

      • Magdalena says:

        I thought his bio-father died some years ago? :O

        And I thought the drug-dealing ex-boyfriend was the father? Yikes.

      • irisrose says:

        Mette-Marit was living with one drug dealer. She had a one-night stand with another drug dealer in the friend group (Morten Borg), Marius was the result.

        Borg has been in his life from the start as co-parent. He married (then divorced) wealthy and had two more sons with whom Marius is close.

        The Norwegian royals have little money. Haakon and Mette-Marit gave Marius a massive free place to live, but his BioDad would have been the probable source of funds for Marius living the high life for years.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        “Haakon may have tried”
        I cannot give the benefit of doubt to Haakon. He married a woman who lived a gangster lifestyle and as it turns out, never stopped. No one can convince me he didn’t know about how Marius lived and who he was surrounded with. Marius is 29, grown up for a decade. Haakon had every right to cut ties with him and even with MM to protect his other children and the monarchy. He didn’t.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        Irisrose, I find it hard to believe that the NRF have little money. They may be better at hiding the grift. Families who are on the top of society for centuries rarely have little money. Probably their ownership of property is disguised and their money is off shore but I bet they have it.

  3. CatGotMyTongue says:

    I agree that it was a slap on the wrist. That said, it’s not like 8 years in prison would rehabilitate him either.

    He’s a POS who doesn’t see other people as people. I’m not sure how to solve that.

    • Emm1 says:

      💯 agree about this piece of 💩

      And 20 years behind bars wouldn’t have been too much either. 🤬

    • Bumblebee says:

      It’s nice to talk about rehabilitation, but what about protecting the women he attacks? How many women will be safe while he’s locked up? How many will he r*pe when they let him out after 4 short years?

  4. Amy Bee says:

    Not enough time but I’m not surprised. It seems like worldwide rapists get off with light sentences or no conviction at all. I don’t think he will change after this.

    • Gewels says:

      Rape is very hard to convict unless there is viable evidence and/or a confession. That’s why so many women don’t bother.
      As far as I can see he wasn’t convicted of rape – only other offences. Also just because he had 34 charges didn’t mean he’d be convicted of the same. With rape charges, usually the best you can hope for is that they don’t walk and are convicted of something related to the rape charge, usually because evidence that stands up in court is scarce. That’s why lesser charges will usually be added to the charge-sheet.
      At least he’ll serve time and have a record.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        There were 4 rape charges and he was convicted of 2 of those counts – the other 2 were dismissed. One of the women who’s rape charge was dismissed is appealing that decision.

        Also he not only filmed himself (on his own cell phone) raping these unconscious women he then shared the footage with his friends. So yeah there was VERY viable evidence proving his crimes.

  5. Anon says:

    Shameful. He’ll probably serve less than half his sentence because “something, something, poor sick mom, good behavior, blah blah blah” and he’ll go back to his old habits. Besides, Norwegian prisons are more like holiday resorts for naughty adults than prisons.

  6. LauraD says:

    Four years is nowhere near enough but, at least it’s something. Andrew Windsor on the other hand is still living a life of luxury on a royal estate, and at the time of writing not one formal charge has been brought against him.

  7. CNEL says:

    He has already appealed according to swedish News.
    Hopefully a higher Court will come down harder on him.

  8. Annie says:

    His mother, Mette-Marit, could also be charged for trying to cover up some of his crimes. Allegedly, she was at the crime scene and tried to hide/get rid off evidence. But of course she won’t be charged. IMO Prince Haakon can no longer inherit the throne. His wife can’t be present and also can’t become Queen. Also if their daughter, Ingrid Alexandra, gets crowned instead of Haakon, Mette-Marit shouldn’t be present for that. It’s all a mess, which could end Norway’s monarchy.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      I don’t know much about Princess Ingrid but am seeing conflicting stories about her elsewhere – some saying she’s ok while others say she’s an entitled cokehead who is easily influenced by Marius. Who knows but the NRF are in just a big a mess at the BRF. No wonder people are turning away from them to support republics.

      Haakon seems a cockold husband – the Epstein files showed that she cheated on him for years as well as showing her practically throwing herself at him (Epstein) He seems a man so in love that he’ll turn a blind eye to it as long as she stays with him. I’ve seen many times how that pans out and its not pretty. She is a total narc and he’s her flying monkey.

      • irisrose says:

        The photo of IA doing coke was proven to be a fake, there may have been defamation charges involved after that.

      • Annie says:

        I think Haakon is one of those cases of people, who just want to avoid at all cost to be hear the sentence “We told you so”. In his case “We told you so this won’t work out/this is will end in huge problems”. Haakon’s sister could also be seen as naive, reckless and impulsive.

        Maybe it’s the unhealthy upbringing as a Crown Prince or a Princess where they were never able to make friendships or relationships without the guarantee that the other person wasn’t an opportunist. Can you really be sure that your friend/partner actually likes you if you weren’t the Prince or the Princess of Norway?

      • irisrose says:

        Harald and Sonja fought for nine years to marry, there was at least one miscarriage along the way to their two children. They may have been extremely indulgent parents who raised loved children instead of raising responsible heirs to the throne.

        Harald sanctioning Martha’s marriage to the shaman (criminal convictions, repeatedly accused of s/A himself) tells the story. Harald could have refused permission, she still would have been able to marry him. But she would have been out of the line of succession.

        Harald is standing in the way of Mette-Marit facing charges for possible evidence tampering too. If he decides she isn’t to be investigated, she isn’t investigated. He has the legal power (which he shouldn’t have). I don’t care how sick she is or isn’t. She should face investigation and prosecution like anyone else. Convict her and then give a lenient sentence because of her health.

        IMO Haakon’s pride prevents him from recognizing his massive mistake.

    • irisrose says:

      Norway votes every four years on whether or not to maintain a monarchy. They voted a few months ago to keep one. They may do this until Harald passes, and eliminate a Haakon-run monarchy in the next vote.

      • Lucy says:

        That’s extremely interesting, Irisrose. Thanks for sharing, I assumed that most monarchies were closer to the British one where they’re just trying to hold on for dear life. I do like that there’s a mechanism for Norway to dump them.

  9. Tn Democrat says:

    Women do not report s#x crimes because the system is designed to discredit them and protect the male offenders, which victimizes them all over again and emboldens offenders. Chose the bear, f#ck the patriarchy and eat the rich.

  10. irisrose says:

    It should have been minimum seven years, and they damn well better make him serve all of it in prison. Not on home release.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Sadly am not convinced he will serve it all in prison – considering the lenient sentence and that a previous court had granted permission for him to go home (which has been challenged by the prosecution and is on hold for now) I suspect its only a matter of time before he gets what he wants. He’s a continued danger to women and he has already proven repeatedly that he is unwilling to stop.

      Looking at all the photo’s out there of him posing with his fug tat’s like he’s ‘the man’ is laughable – he’s quite pathetic.

      The courts and the Norwegian Royal Family need to tread carefully with this as public opinion lies with the victims, not him or his parents. If he is seen to be getting special treatment it won’t bode well. I know his mother is v ill but that should not be used as a reason to be spared prison esp given that his family let him do whatever he wanted when he was on bail (which included continued drug use and harassing/threatening the victims the day before the trail began) as they weren’t supervising him. They are not capable of ensuring he follows the courts rules while on home release.

      • irisrose says:

        This is partly why so many doubt how serious Mette-Marit’s condition is. She had no need of oxygen until after her disastrous interview about her years long friendship with Epstein. In some emails she appeared to admit how much she hates her boring royal life, her multiple affairs, and sneaking the heirs to the throne away from RPOs to go meet Epstein and her lover on a yacht.

        Now she’s “so sick” she needs a transplant and her son cannot be in prison because “the air isn’t safe” for her?

  11. YankeeDoodles says:

    This is sadly what always strikes me about the countries that seem too good to be true: they are. Four years is a f*cking joke. The fact that Norwegian prisons are like holiday resorts compared to American or British ones is an added travesty. But the utopian delusion that you can “rehabilitate” people like this is just part of it. I don’t think you can, I think you have to punish them not out of revenge but out of an outrage on behalf of their victims. I mean. What is the point of society if it can’t see that equation?

    • irisrose says:

      I watched the BBC series Scandinavia with Simon Reeve. Eye opening, from Putin’s military buildup on Svalbard to the tanks they use in suburbs in Sweden because of violent crime.

  12. tyrant_destroyed says:

    Now let’s see the Spa-like “prison” where he will be reinserted into society. Firts world and rich people privilege. Cue to quickly marrying him with someone to become a respectable family men and an entrepreneur-philanthropist hahahahah

  13. Loolaa says:

    A bit of info from a Norwegian:
    I understand the outrage I see in the comments. The thing is, this is a pretty normal sentence in Norway. The max for rape is 10 years if I’m not mistaken. It’s normal to serve for different infractions concurrently, not consecutively. The system is built around rehabilitation, not punishment. The underlying thinking is that being in prison, i.e. being cut off from the outside world, is punishment enough and the prison system shouldn’t add to it with bad conditions nor with long sentences. It’s a whole different outlook on how society functions and what people need that can be hard to grasp for outsiders.

    The max sentence length anyone can get, which is for murder, is 21 years. Some get less for that, say f.ex. 17 years. We do also have “life (21 years) with preventive detention”. That means that after the 21 years are up, another few years can be added if the person is deemed to still be a danger to society, and when that add-on is up, another one can be added. One example of someone having this sentence, is Ander Behring Breivik. Only a handful of people are currently serving life with preventative detention.

    • Loolaa says:

      I also see some talk of rich people treatment, outside influence, cushy conditions, etc. I just want to emphasise again that his sentence is normal for Norway, and where he’ll go with also likely be completely normal. Conditions in jail here are pretty good (see comment above for why).

      • Becks1 says:

        I think the issue people are having is that the sentence should not be normal for Norway.

    • irisrose says:

      This wasn’t one count of rape. This was repeated assaults, bullying and intimidating witnesses, filming himself raping and assaulting women and sharing the videos, etc. Some of those assaults took place AFTER he was arrested for some of the first offenses.

      His mother being protected after she destroyed evidence, cleaned up a crime scene, and intimidated multiple victims. Another highly questionable move because the king refused to let her be interviewed or charged.

      This is a light sentence even for Norway.

    • YankeeDoodles says:

      All due respect, @LooLaa, but “ It’s a whole different outlook on how society functions and what people need that can be hard to grasp for outsiders.” ….is the same sort of sanctimonious pontificating that I was exposed to at the German school where my son attended until we left, quite grateful to have a place at a local British school. This embrace of cultural — and moral — relativism sits very tidily with the whole “vive la différence” theory of Europe, but it’s also an awkward wrinkle in the “rules are rules!” theory of the EU. That is another phase I heard at the German School. And it serves the same purpose: it’s a way of pulling rank, saying, effectively, to outsiders, “it is because it is because it is because it is. You just don’t understand us.” Which is ….infuriating. What it amounts to, in practice, is that we are a law unto ourselves. Imagine my lack of surprise when the UK dipped out of this institutional cognitive dissonance.

  14. irisrose says:

    There were four counts of rape, two were dismissed. One of those victims is already working on her appeal.

  15. jferber says:

    Disgusting. And he’ll probably be released early because blah, blah, blah. Well, one thing is for sure. Norway is now on my shit list as well as the U.S. for creating horrors that no one can bear and stay sane.

  16. jferber says:

    YankeeDoodles, totally agree. You put it perfectly.

  17. JustMe says:

    Sadly 4 years longer than the felon in the White House will serve

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment