John Galliano withdraws after intense backlash against Anna Wintour & Met Gala

Update: This is happening right now, the news just broke a few minutes ago – John Galliano is pulling out of next year’s Met Gala. Below is the original story about the backlash to Galliano-as-Met-Gala-theme.

About a month ago, Anna Wintour announced the 2027 Met Gala theme: John Galliano, the controversial and still-living designer who transformed Dior and Maison Margiela. This is only the third time Wintour has chosen a still-living designer for the honor, which is its own separate controversy. But the bigger controversy is that Galliano was arrested for antisemitic hate speech in France in 2011. Galliano left Dior and went to rehab soon after his arrest, and he’s spent the past fifteen years trying to make amends and show respect to the Jewish community. I have to admit something: when Galliano was announced as the theme, I thought that people had mostly forgiven him, but I was absolutely wrong. Many celebrities have worn Galliano’s designs since 2011, but that doesn’t mean that all is forgiven, nor does it mean that people believe that Galliano is deserving of this special honor while he’s still alive. As it turns out, since the theme announcement, all of Anna Wintour’s carefully-laid plans have blown up in her face. Sponsors and patrons are dropping out, Jewish leaders are speaking out and now Wintour is thinking about doing something huge: moving the date of the gala.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art is facing a growing backlash because of its plan to honor John Galliano, the accomplished British fashion designer who was convicted of a hate crime by a French court in 2011 for his antisemitic outbursts.

Galliano, who transformed Dior into a global powerhouse before his disgrace, is scheduled to be the subject of a nine-month exhibition sponsored by the Met’s Costume Institute. The show is to kick off with the Met Gala, the annual springtime benefit and red carpet extravaganza overseen by Anna Wintour, Vogue’s global editorial director and a Met trustee.

Amid the public criticism, Met trustees and board members have been scrambling to do damage control. For starters, they are mulling whether to move the date of the next Met Gala from its usual slot, the first Monday in May, to the week after. In 2027, Yom HaShoah, also known as Holocaust and Heroism Remembrance Day, will fall on the scheduled party date.

In recent days, opposition to the museum’s plan to honor Galliano has grown among Jewish leaders in New York and beyond. Donors have contacted Met executives and threatened to rescind gifts to the museum if the exhibition moves forward as planned. They have reached out to Wintour, Andrew Bolton, the curator of the Costume Institute, and Max Hollein, the museum’s director.

Julie Menin, the speaker of the City Council, and one of the most senior Jewish officials in city government, called the museum’s decision to highlight Galliano’s career “a serious mistake” in a letter she sent on Thursday to Hollein, Bolton and Wintour. “Our cultural institutions, particularly those that receive funding from the City of New York, have a responsibility to demonstrate that hatred and bigotry carry consequences,” Menin wrote in the letter, which was shared with The New York Times by a museum official. “Words matter, and whom we choose to elevate is a direct statement of our values and what we are willing to tolerate.”

Menin then urged the museum to reconsider its decision to sponsor the exhibition. Reached by phone, she declined to comment. Menin was not the only high-profile figure to confront the museum. Arne Glimcher, the art world titan, recently sent an email critical of the plan to Hollein and David Breslin, a Met curator. “I don’t think you have considered the cost of this action and its reverberations to come,” Glimcher wrote in the email, which was reviewed by The Times. He added that he and his wife “are seriously reconsidering other works that have been earmarked from our collection to the Met in our wills.”

Jill Kargman, a longtime member of Friends of the Costume Institute, a patron group, said she was stepping down from her role because of the show. David Ingber, the senior director for Jewish life and senior director of the Bronfman Center at 92NY and the founding rabbi of the Romemu synagogue, said the museum had created a thorny problem. “By centering Galliano,” he said, “the Met has put the Jewish community in a no-win position. Either we are blamed for being overly sensitive and not allowing him to be honored or we are complicit. The question is not whether they can do this, but whether they should have.”

Elisha Wiesel, son of the Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel and the leader of his father’s charitable foundation, said on Thursday that the decision to honor Galliano “seems like a pretty bad idea.”

“If someone had screamed the worst racial epithet you can imagine, said, ‘You’re a horrible Black person and your ancestors would have been hung from a tree,’ you could not imagine them being honored by a prominent cultural institution.” It would not matter, he added, if the person had apologized for such remarks. Wiesel seemed skeptical that Galliano’s history of antisemitic remarks would be meaningfully addressed in the planned exhibition. He predicted that it would amount to some wall text in the middle of a show devoted to “black-tie archival couture and a carefully managed encounter with antisemitism.”

[From The NY Times]

I think this is very fair: “The question is not whether they can do this, but whether they should have.” This is on Anna Wintour and her team, all of whom thought they were managing the situation by carefully selecting some Jewish leaders to meet with Galliano and give him and the gala their blessing. But the community is not a monolith and different people are going to feel differently about the Galliano-theme selection. Extremely valid points are being made, especially by Elisha Wiesel. I wonder what Wintour will choose: moving back the gala, or dumping her friend Galliano as the theme/honoree. The latter should be given more consideration, but we’ll see. It’s also worth noting that all of this backlash is coming just weeks after Galliano was named for the exhibition and theme – no one waited until the last minute, and honestly, Wintour has plenty of time to course-correct and change her mind.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “John Galliano withdraws after intense backlash against Anna Wintour & Met Gala”

  1. Amy Bee says:

    If Vogue was a serious organization, Anna Wintour would be stepping down after this debacle.

  2. Jegede says:

    Anna did NOT read the room on this occasion. At all…………..😒😒😒😒

  3. Kathalea says:

    Very controversial. Anna should not have taken this decision.

  4. MaisiesMom says:

    I was just reading yesterday that members of the Asian community have spoken out about his past comments too. He hasn’t confined his hate speech to Jews. Being Jewish myself, I was prepared to accept that he had been sincere in his apologies and the work he had done on himself. But it’s not all up to me.

  5. Fredi says:

    Galliano is a BRILLIANT designer, but is without a doubt a “problematic individual,” which is truly unfortunate because a retrospective of his work would have been STUNNING and a joy to experience…IF one is able to separate the artist from the man, which is often a challenge.

    • Donety says:

      I 100% agree that a designer should be allowed to have their work honored, especially one as dynamic as Galliano. The Met recognizes an individual’s body of work, not their personal ideologies. Alexander McQueen was not a perfect human being. Nor was Lagerfeld and many others who have been honored. Go all the way back to Coco Chanel and ask why her perfume continues to be sold in high-end stores.

  6. YankeeDoodles says:

    This one really threw me for a loop. Like, why??? She has always championed his career and to be fair he is a kind of fashion genius. But — and it’s a big but — he is simply vile. All the PR stunt stuff he did with rabbis was damage control. It pretty much ended his career, and it should have done. I disagree vehemently with Israeli policy in the West Bank and Gaza and there is a fascinating and astonishing article in the NYT today about how many Israeli former soldiers and security types disagree with it as well. But Galliano was just being vicious and crudely antisemitic. He told two older ladies that they would have been gassed. That’s…. Like, game over, dude.

    • Jegede says:

      And apparently that was NOT his first time.🫤🫤🫤

      It was only the first time it was – unfortunately for him – caught on camera!

  7. Jais says:

    Anna needs sponsors with major money for the next met gala and I’m guessing the theme of galliano was proving to be too much of an issue to get funding.

    • Jegede says:

      Major powerhouses like Alice Tisch & Arne Glimcher were going to pull long standing financial support.

      Wintour really FAFO!

      • Jais says:

        Well there ya go. And to be real, I prefer themes that aren’t about a singular designer so I’ll be curious to see what’s decided as the new theme.

  8. Eurydice says:

    This decision affected the entire Met, not just the Costume Institute. Well, they’ve canceled the whole thing and are going back to the drawing board. It’ll be interesting to see what replaces it.

    • liz says:

      It will not happen because it’s just not sexy enough, but I’d love to see them do something on New York’s Garment District and the Jewish tailors and seamstresses who kept it going for decades.

      • YankeeDoodles says:

        That is an INCREDIBLE idea, @Liz. I had a Jewish stepparent and I vividly remember when my own parent could not find something in a coat that had been taken to be tailored — a button or a tag or something — their spouse said, “check under the left armhole, in the lining, it’ll be stitched just under it.” …and it was!!!! Their grandparent had been a tailor. I always find it fascinating that people whose demographics are selected for specially intimate or personal work (nannies, tailors, cooks, etc….) people whom you have to trust, are invested with a kind of weird power that then frightens the outsiders, to that dynamic, who are just less fortunate.

      • Eurydice says:

        That is a spectacular idea and totally sexy. And it could bring participation from other NYC institutions.

      • MaisiesMom says:

        That’s a great idea, honestly. It’s a very vivid and important part of NYC history, too. I became obsessed with it as a kid when I read about the Triangle Factory fire.

  9. cws says:

    Wintour considered moving the sate because it conflicted with Holocaust remembrance events, hosting Galliano tribute the same night was a bad look.
    Wintour has done horrible things including employing photographer Terry Richardson long after his predatory sexual behavior towards models became well-known.
    Why isn’t a committee coming up with these themes instead of just Wintour?

  10. LadyE says:

    Ah yes, Anna Wintour, and the continued nonsense that “artistes” are somehow social justice minded people. Such nonsense. It’s what people want to believe because “but, she has such a good eye for tailoring!!”?? I guess…

    Anna Wintour the same woman who famously refused to cut ties with Kanye West after his “slavery was a choice” and “Harriet Tubman didn’t free a single slave”. Anna Wintour who had to be dragged kicking and screaming to finally say she would not work with Kanye after his “White Lives Matter” show at Paris Fashion Week, and which she only did because he went on a twitter rampage against a black female editor of Vogue?

    Ah, yes, that Anna Wintour. Anna doesn’t give a shit about racism, antisemitism, any -ism unless it can be repackaged as “art” and then she’s all about it, so provocative, don’t you know?

  11. L4Frimaire says:

    I recognize his talent and contribution to fashion but didn’t think they should have made this theme in his honor. A lot of chatter says he still makes anti-semitic comments, despite his so-called repentance. Wintour has her favorites she wants to promote but Galliano is still working and his portfolio isn’t complete. Side note but didn’t like the curation of the Black Dandyism exhibit. The space and lighting wasn’t great, and felt they should have had more historical garments featured.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment