Dr. Drew apologizes for saying that Brad & Angelina would have “nuclear split”

LOS ANGELES - OCT 14: Drew Pinsky arrives at the Visionary Awards 2010 at Beverly Hilton Hotel on October 14, 2010 in Beverly Hills, CA Photo via Newscom

Yesterday, the Huffington Post published excerpts from a larger interview with Dr. Drew Pinsky. Dr. Drew talked smack about Brangelina, Eva Longoria, Scarlett Johansson, and several other celebrities. I considered the entire interview to be pretty disgusting coming from an alleged medical professional, and I thought (as I continue to think) that Dr. Drew has been whoring himself out for his stab at fame, just be giving salacious quotes about random celebrities. Anyway, Dr. Drew might have realized that he left himself wide open to a series of lawsuits, because he’s now trying to roll back some of his comments. Specifically, the stuff about Brangelina.

Dr. Drew Pinksy is making a public apology to Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie in an RadarOnline.com exclusive video interview amid reports he said the superstar pair was headed toward a nuclear split.

“These comments were taken completely out of context (and) they were never meant to be printed,” said the Celebrity Rehab host, who does not treat the celebrity couple.
“I do not know Brad or Angelina (and) I certainly don’t want to be saying things that could be perceived as hurtful for them, or harmful for them in any way.

“I’m deeply concerned and apologetic and apologize for these comments that were taken out of context.”

Dr. Drew, a board certified addiction specialist, reportedly said Brangelina were on a one-way road toward splits-ville, in part because of Jolie’s past addiction to heroin.

He was quoted as saying, “Just add up a couple things… there’s no such thing as ‘I was a heroin addict’. That doesn’t exist in nature. Something is going on with [her] addiction. Or she’s in recovery (and) I don’t see any evidence that’s the case.”

He reportedly said when Brad and Angelina were put together, it was “a really volatile situation” and the pair was “constantly creating things to weld themselves together”.

However, speaking exclusively to RadarOnline.com, Dr. Drew said he talking in a hypothetical exercise in which he used Pitt and Jolie merely as examples.

“Categorically these comments were not supposed to be in the public discourse,” he said.
“I don’t know these people, I don’t know the facts. Literally as though one was speculating, just going through an exercise of speculation and not some sort of analysis that was supposed to be factual or for public discourse… I could not be more upset and disturbed that these things were printed as though I was making some sort of categorical analysis of people I really don’t know.”

Dr. Drew, the long-time host of radio’s Loveline and of the VH1 shows Sex Rehab and Sober House, also had a direct message for the high-profile pair.

“I wish them the best, I hope they do well, enjoy the holidays with their kids and have a nice time. I wish them no ill, believe me… I’m sorry these comments were taken out of context and made public,” he added.

[From Radar]

Eh. I might take Dr. Drew’s word that his comments were in no way designed to get him more publicity, if not for the fact that he’s said similar crap about Angelina Jolie before. Plus, he has a history of saying nasty stuff about whoever is getting more press than him anyway. I also find it interesting that he’s only really apologizing for the Brangelina stuff – he talked about many celebrities in that interview, so I guess he’s not doing “takesies-backsies” on all of it. So… do you buy Dr. Drew’s “apology”? Eh.

NEW YORK - MAY 05: Dr. Drew Pinsky attends The Candie's Foundation Event To Prevent at Cipriani 42nd Street on May 5, 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images)

LOS ANGELES - DEC 16: Drew Pinsky arrives at CNN's 'Larry King Live' final broadcast party at Spago on December 16, 2010 in Beverly HIlls, CA. Photo via Newscom

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

115 Responses to “Dr. Drew apologizes for saying that Brad & Angelina would have “nuclear split””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. mln76 says:

    It’s actually really smart because he got himself on two news cycles. What an unprofessional douche.

  2. bite me says:

    whatever, he wanted some press, he sure received it… next

  3. shockedandappalled says:

    That didn’t take long.

  4. ThirdChris says:

    Has he not yet learned if it’s not fit to be printed then he shouldn’t be saying it? Oh wait…he WANTS the publicity.

  5. Hollowdoll says:

    He is such a toad. I wish he’d crawl back under his rock.

  6. anon says:

    @mln76: yep
    @bite me: yep
    oh the apology will get him even more press, way to stay in the news.

  7. Pearl says:

    I used to like him on Loveline, but he’s a super doosh-bag now. No credibility anymore.

  8. lisa says:

    Kaiser you are right he has said crap in the past. He should just keep his mouth shut. I wonder if he was contacted by someone and shown that he could be sued. YES. I hope it was a lawyer on Brad/Angie’s behalf. I hope so. I would love for them to start suing some of these people. Their kids are getting older.

    and he admitted saying the crap..just that it was not meant to be printed. YEAH as if. He should know that if you say things about certain celebs it will be printed.

    STUPIDASS..

  9. mslewis says:

    I will tell you EXACTLY what happen and why Dr. Drew issued this apology: HE GOT A LETTER FROM ANGELINA AND BRAD’S LAWYER!!!

    I am in the law profession and I have written many “cease and desist” letters to people who have committed borderline slander/libel and these words from Pinsky are the EXACT wording that the injured party’s attorney insists be used in an apology in an open forum. Believe me, this man received a VERY STRONGLY WORDED LETTER and was told to apologize IMMEDIATELY and in public or a suit would be filed against him within 48 hours. The letter was most likely hand delivered to him and he most likely called his attorney who then told him to get in front of the nearest camera and start retracking.

    Good for Brad and Angelina and their attorneys. I know they (especially Angelina) prefer to ignore idiots but what this man said was just over the top and I’m glad they decided to take action.

  10. neelyo69 says:

    Has Jolie ever admitted to being a heroin addict? Is it public record? What careless statements. I hope they sue him.

  11. Westcoaster says:

    Dr. Drew better watch his back. The more he puts himself in the public eye that will just make him a target for one of the tabloids. I would bet money that TMZ ,Enquirer etc already have people looking into his past.

  12. YT says:

    He is always ready to hand out unsolicited advice in public to people he does not know. He should seek professional help about his constant need for attention. Oops. That’s normal in L.A.

  13. Crash2GO2 says:

    He actually apologized for exactly nothing.

  14. Stronzilla says:

    “Categorically these comments were not supposed to be in the public discourse,” he said.

    Then why the hell was he giving them to the Huffington Post or radaronline? And what academic credentials does a board certififed addition specialist have to have? What board certified him? All he did in that interview was make a ‘categorical analysis’ (this word is very big with this guy) of a laundry list of people he doesn’t know based upon facts he doesn’t have and not only did he get publicity for it yesterday he gets it again today by apologizing. Oooh, way to court controversy Dr. Pinsky. I say we put him a locked house with Michael, Dina and Lindsay and then we’ll have some fun.

  15. guesty says:

    pesky pinsky. bet his lawyers had a fit & strongly recommended a semi-retraction.

  16. lisa says:

    @mslewis..

    I hope your assessment is correct. And I hope this is a new course for them. I saw that interview and he was sweating bullets. He needs to learn to watch his mouth. I hope Brad/Angie do this more often. They usually ignore these kinds of attacks. Dr. Drew has kids. How would he have felt if someone had said this mess about him and his wife at CHRISTMAS time.. idiot.

  17. bros says:

    he is really becoming a shit. I thought his statements were obscene and completely speculative, really slanderous and absurd. the idea that brad is the one not into long term relationships? look at anistons relationship history. thats enough to tell you that Dr. Droop has no idea what he is blathering about. brad has been with angelina as long or longer than he was with aniston. and she has careened from one relationship to another since their divorce. half of her exes end up married and with a child after dating her. she is like a fluffer for marriage and kids for her future exes. I think its pretty obvious who the person into long term relationships was, and its not aniston.

  18. fanny says:

    I believe him when he said he meant the discussion to be private. He was voicing his opinion, the way most of us do on this site about people we don’t know. His stupid mistake was thinking it would be kept private. Yes … he needs to apologize to EVERYONE and not just “The Brand”.

  19. Bill Hicks is God says:

    If he were really serious about apologizing, this walking carbuncle would tear his degree in half and throw on a McDonald’s nametag in repentance.

    There again, I wouldn’t want a tapeworm asking me if I “want fries with that.”

  20. dread pirate cuervo says:

    Was she a heroin addict? Like had to go to rehab & NA meetings to kick the habit? Or did she experiment, whether she did a little or alot? Just because she used, doesn’t necessarily make her an addict & Dr. Drew should know that. & how disgusting for him, as an addiction specialist, to imply that addicts can’t recover to lead worthwhile lives. That they’re somehow damaged goods unworthy or incapable of love.

  21. TeeTee says:

    because he probably got death threats from her psycho fans!! LOL

    Remember folks she is HUMAN, hope she doesn’t let everyone down..

    please beleive one of those children will write abook and the truth will come out..until then leave in your
    “Ange would NEVER” world..LOL

  22. Ally says:

    Shame he felt pressured in to apologising for having an opinion. But no surprise really….whatever happened to the good ole USA’s freedom of speech.

    Makes me laugh, if an individual says something the majority don’t agree with they’re harrassed and insulted until they have to grovel.

  23. the_porscha says:

    Uh, yeah, I totally buy it, until he does this exact. same. thing. next week.

  24. Cheyenne says:

    Classic bullshit excuse whenever a douchebag like him finds all the crap is splattering back on him: “My remarks were taken out of context” and “I never meant for them to be made public.” Yeah right.

    From now on, Dr. Demento, keep your dumb fucking mouth shut.

  25. MNGIRL76 says:

    I will tell you EXACTLY what happen and why Dr. Drew issued this apology: HE GOT A LETTER FROM ANGELINA AND BRAD’S LAWYER!!!

    Oh Please! I thought they were in some remote part of the country?! They claim not to pay any attention to this type of crap! I agree with Dr. Drew about the heroin thing.

  26. lucy2 says:

    I agree Crash, it was a typical Hollywood non-apology. Not “I’m sorry for saying things I had no business saying” but instead “sorry it was taken out of context”. Meaning sorry someone else did something they weren’t supposed to and printed it.
    If he were truly sorry for talking crap about people he doesn’t know and presenting it as a medical opinion, he’d have apologized to everyone he mentioned in this particular instance, and all the previous ones.

  27. Reality says:

    mslewis, expessing an opinion alone is not defamation (even if you don’t agree with it) free speach is protected by the First Amendment, and unless you can prove malice of intent, it would be extremely difficult to prove. I gather from your post that you’re a legal secretary, so you probably already know this.

    It was extemely unprofessional of him to offer his opinion about any of these couples, but people aren’t freaking out about that, they’re upset that someone said something negative about AJ. The very thought of the Brange splitting or AJ doing drugs causes the fans to on super attack mode.

  28. anon says:

    @Stronzilla:”Then why the hell was he giving them to the Huffington Post or radaronline?” 🙂

  29. eja102 says:

    perhaps he should have just he was being “protective of his show”

    an apology is not an apology when it comes with an excuse.

  30. lisa says:

    @Ally

    He is in a different category then the “average Joe” giving an OPINION.. he is a Doctor. And his “opinion” is looked at in a different light. That being said he has to walk a different line if he wants to be taken seriously.

    I always laugh at the people that label their fans as crazy and loonie. But when a none fan spews lies and post crap that is proven NOT TRUE.. hmmmm what is the name for people like that?

    People that take Tabloid gossip and run to EVERY single site and post it. People that meet on HATE blogs and make plans of spreading any negative story. YES meet and plan this. So stop calling the fans crazy. I think people that against this couple wishing for a family to break up are more crazy then any fan could be. BUT according to some this is sane behavior. I think not.

  31. Cheyenne says:

    @Reality: Maybe you need to change your screen name because you’re kind of divorced from reality on this thread.

    This guy didn’t just express an opinion; he labeled Angie a heroin addict without a shred of evidence to back him up. I can see his lawyer shitting brickbats when he saw what his client said. He left himself wide open to a bajillion-dollar lawsuit.

    I am getting a visual of Dr. Demento twisting slowly in the wind. It couldn’t happen to a more deserving douchebag.

    @mslewis: I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when he got that letter. He must have shat himself.

  32. ZooniQ says:

    Unprovoked public attacks on Brad or Angelina or both means tons of publicity. Just ask Chelsea Handler. Its pathetically transparent.

  33. MNGIRL76 says:

    @eja102
    Agreed! Not an apology if followed by an excuse!

  34. WhiteNoise says:

    What a pitiful liar he is on top of everything else. But good that he’s been made to retract what he said. It just casts even more doubt on what’s left of his professional credibility.

  35. N.D. says:

    It no way this is a proper apology. He claimed in no uncertain terms that AJ is a heroin addict NOW (he “knows” she was and he saw no signs of recovery in her). That’s a very loud statement. And his apology is “It wasn’t meant to be heard”?!

    Disgusting behaviour. At least Chelsea stood by her shit.

  36. Tazina says:

    The ultimate fame-ho….his information is flawed and without merit. Pretty lame apology as he really denies nothing, just says it wasn’t for public record. This douche has zero credibility.

  37. mslewis says:

    I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when he got that letter. He must have shat himself.
    —————————————————————-
    I am SURE he did!!! He probably never expected any sort of response because, as Kaiser pointed out, he has said this type of crap about Angelina before and there were no consequences. He was totally unprepared for any sort of response this time. That’s why this retraction is coming so quickly and why he was in front of the radaronline cameras. He needed to get this out ASAP!! This fool is a total idiot but he’s not stupid!!

  38. Brittney says:

    Angie’s not one to care or respond to public insults, but in the rare occasion that someone insults her ability to mother her children, she takes a stand.

    She cut her father out of her life for a long time for jeopardizing her adoption of Maddox by mentioning her past mental instabilities, and Dr. Drew calling her a current HEROIN ADDICT is way beyond that. If the right people heard it and believed it, future adoptions could be much more difficult. I have no doubt that Brad and Angie’s lawyer contacted him immediately, and that’s the only reason he apologized at all.

    Unfortunately, it’s only giving him more undeserved publicity.

  39. mslewis says:

    mslewis, expessing an opinion alone is not defamation (even if you don’t agree with it) free speach is protected by the First Amendment, and unless you can prove malice of intent, it would be extremely difficult to prove.
    ——————————————————–
    You are correct on this point. He was stating his opinion, which is not defamation. However, it is slander and that is most likely what the letter pointed out.

    I have said many times that, in the U.S., it is very difficult (almost impossible) to win a libel/slander suit. HOWEVER, it is also very expensive to defend against a libel/slander suit. I have a feeling Pinsky’s attorney pointed out to him how much it would cost him to defend against a suit IF Angelina and Brad did file against him. They have many millions of dollars and can keep a suit in the courts for years if they wanted to punish him. They could literally bankrupt him. It was prudent of him to do some public backtracking.

  40. DD says:

    If he had just kept out the part where he suggested that Angelina is currently a heroin addict, than it would’ve passed. As a doctor, he’s pretty stupid. I had a year long phase where I used drugs many, many years ago. Although my use wasn’t heavy but it involved drugs considered addictive. I never went into rehab and I don’t consider myself an addict. I consider that part of my past to be an experience. I learned a lot from it. I have been around people using drugs on several occasions since then and I was never tempted.
    If I were to believe Dr. Drew, than none of my thoughts and feelings are relevant because I am an addict and I don’t know any better. He’s a douche, and he shouldn’t be slandering someone’s reputation like that. It is harmful to them and undeserved.

  41. Reality says:

    Cheyenne, the only reason you think my comment is ‘divorced from reality’ is because you don’t agree with it. If he had said Jennifer Aniston is a pot-smoking pathetic spinster who doesn’t want children, and repels men like anthrax, that ‘defamatory’ statement of his would have been co-signed by you.

    But instead, it’s attack mode and talk of ‘bajilion dollar lawsuits’ against ‘Dr. Demento’ (clever) because he said AJ might be a recovering heroin addict. Not because he said Kelsey Grammer is a serial re-marrier, or Miley is mentaly unstable, or that Eva is a love addict.

    It’s not what this stupid little man said that’s got your knickers in a twist. It’s who he was talking about.

  42. P.J. says:

    What’s interesting is that Dr. Drew apologized, but didn’t take anything back! He said it was wrong of him to say what he did (I agree he crossed the line), but he never said his analysis of Brangelina’s fate was faulty or inaccurate.

    Guess we’ll have to wait and see.

  43. Anon says:

    No, I think this narcissistic phony doctor’s apology is as fake as he is, he’s a lying name-dropper. Does he have a publicist and who is it? SH?
    Now what was that number to complain about the practice of Dr. Does Harm to his Patients? Rapes and suicides associated with the good doctor’s name is unethical and illegal. Stop reading those tabloid$ and lying for rating$, Dr. Drew and go back to school and ethics.

  44. MrsOdie2 says:

    Oh, Dr. Drew, never underestimate the wrath of a Brangelina fan. She believes that these two people are all that is good in the world and Lord help you if you say anything to defame them.

  45. teri says:

    This quack doesn’t know shite about Angelina or how she lives her life. With all these other long term relationships going to crap he calls this couple out?

  46. skibunny says:

    Where’s all the outrage when it comes to what he said about Eva Longoria? Oh yeah we dont idolize her!!!

  47. T. says:

    I think Dr. Drew is addicted to FAME!!!

  48. EMILY says:

    He was definitely speculating but VERY accurate.

  49. Kiska says:

    covering his ass. His lawyers were probably contacted.

  50. Stubbylove says:

    Used to really like Dr. Drew – he seemed to be actually sincere and offer sensible advise. But he’s lost himself in the BS that is Hollywierd. His credibility is going down the shiter.

  51. Whatever says:

    @skibunny

    The first thing that came to mind is “who is this douche?” The second was annoyance (I skip the “outrage” for people I don’t even know)! He is a hack. NO reputable medical professional makes diagnoses based on what they see on television or tabloids! IMO, this means EVERYONE he trashes, Angelina, Eva, Lindsay, Jon and Kate, etc, blah, blah. The guy is a douchenozzle.

  52. Runs with Scissors says:

    @Skibunny: “Where’s all the outrage when it comes to what he said about Eva Longoria? Oh yeah we dont idolize her!!!”

    This seems like a strange reaction, it’s almost like you’re jealous that people defend her??

    Come on, calling someone a heroin addict in front of the whole world including her children is hardly the same thing as saying someone is a love addict.

    Plenty of people are angry about this guy’s lack of professionalism. What he and people like Handler are doing to AJ and her family is beyond disgusting. If people defend her, it doesn’t make them loons or crazy, it makes them human imo.

    ditto to ‘Reality’

  53. Kiska says:

    Let’s not forget this guy is supposedly a medical professional and what he said was slanderous. His credibility is zero and its not only the Jolie-Pitts he attacked. I hope he gets into trouble over this because he seems to always squeak by when he runs off on tangents.

  54. Crash2GO2 says:

    @mslewis: ““I’m deeply concerned and apologetic and apologize for these comments that were taken out of context.””

    How in the world can you consider that a retraction? He didn’t say “I had no business stating that Angelina is a heroin addict.” Or “In no way should I be speculating on the state of their marriage.”

    He retracted nothing and apologized for nothing. The fact that you and Cheyenne are buying it as a retraction is kind of funny though. It shows how slick he is.

  55. TeeTee says:

    The mags have been dishing bits and pieces for years on her drug use and temper..Ange has NOT sued them..

    what a joke, now Drew is the devil, Angie stans crack me up!!

  56. Jaxx says:

    I wish they had just sued his effing mouth shut instead of demanding a retraction. He is a creep of the first magnitude. He said straight out that she is a heroin ADDICT. LIBEL.

    I am so sick of this rumor following her. She claims she TRIED it. That she tried every drug. She never says she became addicted to anything. And she is not in recovery because of that very fact.

    The proof? She would never be allowed to represent the UN if she used ANY drugs. They drug test their reps repeatedly and regularly. No way she could hide drug use. And the UN is not about to have their reps embarrass them so they keep tabs. Very close tabs. I don’t see why people don’t see this when they throw drug use that happened years ago in her fact.

    Dr. Drew is a jerk.

  57. Kara says:

    I love it when egotistical ppl pretend to apologize. It’s not my fault I said it publically–instead, my words were taken out of context. No accountablity for himself, and he tries to make himself into the victim. This I expect from Lindsay Lohan, but NOT from a medical professional. Where is his maturity? You don’t know these celebs so making statements that she’s a heroin addict and will never recover is pretty cruel. I have no idea what he was trying to accomplish there other than get some attention by being nasty. Is that how you encourage ppl to get better? What a truly awful person.

    I feel sorry for any real addicts who have to endure the bad doctor’s advice. He seems like a vampire–willing to exploit a person’s addiction to make himself wealthy and famous. And I doubt he really wants his patients to get better–if they did, he wouldn’t be able to exploit them anymore.

  58. lucy2 says:

    Well, she hasn’t sued Drew either. I’m guessing a letter was sent suggesting he knock it off, and he back tracked. With the tabloids, I think they know where the lawsuit line is and are careful to go right to it but not cross it.

    As far as crazy…I think it’s safe to say that there’s crazy on both far ends of the spectrum. My personal feeling is that it’s best to avoid the sites that cater to that.

  59. Kim says:

    TeeTee Are you comparing articles in a trashy tabloid and the comments of a licensed doctor.That’s like comparing an article in tabloid to an article in Wall Street Journal in terms of the percieved truthfulness. Anyway where is his apology to Eva and Scarlett and Mylie’s mom- Tish.

  60. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    I highly doubt he got any kind of letter from the Brand’s lawyers. He didn’t say anything that he could be directly sued for.

    I think the whole thing was just a publicity stunt. He knows he’ll get attention if he breathes a word about them. Now he’s made two statements related to them and he’s getting double the attention. He knew if he reversed his statements quickly enough, people would make a big deal of it. Notice he’s not apologizing about saying stuff about the other people.

    He’s a famewhore who took advantage of some other famewhores to get attention.

  61. Hakura says:

    It was incredibly irresponsible of him to be making statements about people’s relationships as though he’s treated them.

    Being a doctor, people are going to give his opinions more weight. He really should’ve known better.

  62. Deborah says:

    Dr. Drew is a sexy beast!! I watch the show just to check him out!!! If he wants more viewers he just needs to take his shirt off LOL

  63. something borrowed says:

    It must be obvious to big fat arses who cant conceive of “doing ten things before breakfast” that a woman “has a problem” if she can:
    .
    …accomplish the following within the space of 6-9 months: organize the relocation of her entire family to a new country so she can be available to shoot a movie there;
    .
    do press and premieres for another movie in 4-6 countries; yet not be away from her family for more than 3 days in a row, so that she can be with all her kids together to do family stuff,and to make sure she takes care of her man’s needs;
    .
    Support her man and be the hands-on parent while he shoots his movie and takes care of his other projects;
    .
    take the 4 older kids of her 6 kids along with her on her movie promotions so that they can be with her as well as (re-)experience other cultures while still making sure to organize their schooling so that their formal education remains uninterrupted;
    .
    read and educate herself; (if my memory serves me right, i think she’s studying international law right now. Much as how she learnt to get over her incompetence in math and physics so that she could successfully acquire not one but TWO international PILOT’S LICENSES).
    .
    be available to the UN to help them draw public attention to a forgotten part of the world where refugees need international assistance;
    .
    write a screenplay for her debut feature length movie;
    .
    organize to shoot the movie for the said screenplay in a difficult part of the world;
    .
    begin and complete shooting of said movie;
    .
    order christmas presents for her large, extended family and have them shipped;
    .
    plan and organize for the family’s thanksgiving, christmas and new year activities and travels.
    .
    .
    Yeah, i can see how a morbidly obese, ADD-afflicted, jacked-up on meds, no-talent, worthless piece of protoplasm could look at a woman like this and thinks she has a problem.

  64. Camille says:

    @38: Its probably because Eva wasn’t accused of being a ‘heroin addict’. Bit of a difference. What he said about Eva was just silly and laughable and not all that offensive really. *shrug*
    Although I am sure if he had said the same thing about Jennifer Aniston being a ‘love addict’ or whatever dumb shit this quack had to say, you can bet that this thread would be twice as long 😆 .

  65. Sakyiwaa says:

    OMG. what a douche. a number of people on HuffPo and Dlisted said he was gonna do this when i read over there yesterday. Dr. Prew Dinsky rants… then, cue the apology… ugh.
    what’s his REAL name and Social Security number? i need to give Angie a call.

  66. Whamo says:

    @TEE TEE
    She’s afraid to call Dr Drew on this because she knows if he had to he could bring out a boatload of people that would testify they have either sold her heroin or done it with her. Dr Drew is as phoney as Angelina is but do you really think this accusation of heroin use is completely out of thin air…that there is absolutely NO truth to it at all? Of course not, a lot of people know she’s a drug addict and has been for YEARS .Why else would she not strenuously defend such accusations? Here is a person that controls (manipulates) her image like crazy and she doesn’t go after him full guns a blazin!? SHE CAN’T, it would finally let the genie out of the bottle and show people the person she REALLY is….a heroin using liar.

  67. Runs with Scissors says:

    @something borrowed. You’re absolutely right, there’s no way she’s on heroin, she must be on coke 😉

  68. Whamo says:

    People that have this movie version of what a heroin user is and should look like really need to educate themselves. A person can use this drug in an amount to simply maintain themselves so they don’t get sick (withdraw),when doing this they show little to NO signs at all of being high, or they can take enough to get whack out and go on the nod (fade in and out) the nod is what most people think heroin users should look like, head bent forward and kind of snapping back catching themselves from falling asleep, eyes rolling back, unable to speak properly and act normal. I’ll tell you this, there are THOUSANDS of functional users that you’d NEVER know they are addicts. They can keep their lives together, work and function for the better part of their live. If you do a little research you can find lots and lots of famous people that contributed greatly to our society in literature and medicine that we now know were hooked on opiates and a wide variety of other drugs.
    Educate yourselves so you know what the hell you’re talking about when you try and defend this person with your amazing insights into what a drug addict is or should act like.

  69. Sakyiwaa says:

    @something borrowed: i agree totally…with everything you just said. it’s fascinating that PROACTIVITY is considered a thing for ADDICTS. then again, the entire world is populated with addicts cos we’re all addicted to one thing or another…like more exercise…or sun-tanning.

  70. Kim says:

    Well there are reports that The JP family are in Nambibia(where Shiloh was born). The papers there say they arrived Sunday and will be there until the 26 th So as usual Brad and Angie live their lives. Oh yeah Angie stated in an interview that they will be in Springfield, MO for New Years . I like that they stay above the fray and didn’t comment on this or Chelsea’s comments. Well I’m off to the mall (smile)

  71. Kiska says:

    @ Kara. Well said. ITA

  72. Tomas says:

    What are all you loonies gonna do when the doctor is right and they do split??? What will you do with your day? Unfortunately, the doctor’s comments are probably closer to the truth than you all think….

  73. Sakyiwaa says:

    @Kim, it is spelt “Namibia”. and oh, i’m not happy this is out. the silly papz are gonna hunt the family down in Namibia and ruin their fun and privacy!
    @Tomas; let’s all hope we live to see that then…the truth always reveals itself.

  74. Cheyenne says:

    Reality: If he had said Jennifer Aniston is a pot-smoking pathetic spinster who doesn’t want children, and repels men like anthrax, that ‘defamatory’ statement of his would have been co-signed by you.
    =========================================

    You need to put your brains in gear before you put your mouth in drive. I’d never co-sign “pot-smoking” because I have no evidence that she smokes pot beyond internet rumor, which is baseless. However, being dumped by man after man since her divorce (Vince Vaughn, Paul Sculfor, and Mayer the Player — not once, but twice), pretty much validates the description of “man repellant”.

  75. Cheyenne says:

    Yo, Whamo: Until you can name ONE person you can prove sold Angelina heroin, STFU.

    ________________________________________

    Tomas: What are all you loonies gonna do when the doctor is right and they do split???
    ========================================

    Good lord, you little jenhens have been counting the days and minutes till their break-up since 2005. Do you have any idea how bitter and pathetic you look? Why don’t you give it up and get a life?

  76. Kelly says:

    As a doctor, he has ZERO credibility. Who in their right mind would trust this guy to treat them when he makes irresponsible comments about people he’s never met? He’s said some terrible things about many other celebs, too. He seems like a horrible person.

    And his apology amounts to this: “I’ve never met you, but you ARE an addict, you will always be miserable, you will suffer a HORRIBLE split, and I will (probably) laugh at your pain. I’m not sorry I said it–just that my comments made ME look bad. Oh, and Merry Christmas!!!” 🙂

  77. Camille says:

    Oh I see a ton of comments were in moderation, so my comment wasn’t actually in response to #38, it was to #47. Nice to see some others replied to her as well. 😀

    @DD: ITA. Excellent comment.

  78. Reality says:

    mslewis- “He was stating his opinion, which is not defamation. However, it is slander.”

    Slander and libel are both defamation. It puzzles me that you don’t know that, given your career.

    Cheyenne- “You need to put your brains in gear before you put your mouth in drive.”

    Haha, that doesn’t even make any sense!

    Calm down old girl, of course you wouldn’t co-sign that libelous statement, how silly of me to suggest you would. I mean you know who did the dumping in those relationships right, it’s not based on internet rumour? Or only one side of the story like Jolie’s alleged dealer?

    And the claims against Jolie aren’t all based on rumour, there’s the video where she’s obviously high at a table full of gear and talks about killing her pets, her own confession “I’ve done coke, heroin, ectasy, LSD, everything. I gave them up long ago.” It may or may not make her an addict, but it certainly is grounds for public speculation.

  79. yolly says:

    Boycott his show. What a pathetic liar another co-tailler of the Jolie-Pitt’s. I could have slam him with my huge bag to give him a lesson. Don’t mess with the Jolie-Pitt’s, it will backfire.Their fans will defend Brad & Angie. I am mad at this Dr. saying something without basis.Brad & Angie should sue him.

  80. lisa says:

    @reality..

    You are talking about what 12 year or so ago.. hmmm..

    I wonder why no outcry against RDJ or Johnny D, Drew B, and countless others that have had major drug issues. Show me in the last 9 years where Angie is on drugs.

    YEAH thought not. and I don’t mean nasty tabloid or blog crap. That video of her talking about her pet is just that her talking. How many kids have caused a pet to die because they were stupid. Are they forever labeled. NO just Angelina.

    Whatever. the people that need to believe the worst will. Have at it. while Angelina continues to live her life with her family..Best way to say FU to all the naysayers waiting for the end of her relationship..

  81. Crash2GO2 says:

    “there’s the video where she’s obviously high at a table full of gear and talks about killing her pets”

    WTF?? O_o

  82. Rena says:

    Dr Drew is a fake, he knows nothing. He opened his big mouth to get PR for his new tv show. He has no credibility. He has been reported to the CA Medical Board which frowns on professionals making armchair diagnoses and bringing discredit to other physicians. This man is a danger to those desperate people who seek his help. All in celebrity rehab on his show are now in worse shape, he uses them for his own PR and wealth accumulation. He had no business to say anything about those he has treated and those he has not treated. He is no seer. And yes as a public figure he is held to a higher standard that an ordinary citizen and a potential lawsuit by any he has slandered, defamed and libeled might well be successful. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just ignoring what is reality. Dr Drew cried fire in a crowed theatre and he he needs to pay for it. I for one hope he does.

  83. Cheyenne says:

    @Reality: She’s done drugs in the past. She’s the first to admit it. That was then, this is now. Pull your head out of 2005 and try to catch up with the rest of the world. You’ve got a long way to go but with a big effort on your part you might make it.

  84. Rena says:

    That video was made over 14-15 years ago, Angelina was not shown using any drug in any manner at all. The pet incidents she spoke of had happened years before the video was made. It is interesting that someone refers to this as proof of something that may or may not be true. Does one behave exactly the same as they did 15 years ago? Is ones life exactly the same? Or has one changed over time like all people do? Or is someone’s mind set that one is always the same forever and ever? I see people everyday who are vastly different from who and what they were 15 years ago, who at the age of 35 are vastly different people than who they were in their early 20’s. BUT I guess some who are blind see only that people are rooted in concrete and refuse to accept that people grow up. JDeep ws a known druggie who ran with RiverP and had a bar with him, who was thrown out of hotels for tearing up rooms in fights with his GFs especially kate moss, is he the same person today? No of course not. Neither is Angelina or Brad or anyone. Angelina says she does not do drugs and I have no reason to disbelieve someone I do not know anything personally about whose behavior indicates is a rational stable adult who loves her family. And I never believe anything in a tabloid, espeially not videos that may have been altered.

  85. Helen says:

    Of course people know exactly what they are doing and the possible ramifications. All that’s required is a public apology afterwards. lol. I’m not a Brangie fan.

  86. shy says:

    Yeah, diagnosing people based on internet rumors and scant evidence gleaned from a 10 yr. old video is really idiotic. I know that the non-fans want to believe every nasty thing because they have it in for Angelina, but I think rational people would find this repulsive. I certainly wouldn’t want Dr. Creep near me or my loved ones under any circumstances.

  87. AnnaZed says:

    Given that highly paid actors are literally at the mercy of insurance companies who will not cover film shoots when they believe that actors are impaired and could cause the shoots to shut down or not complete on time or on budget Dr. Drew’s irresponsi­ble opinion that Angelina Jolie is an “addict for life” (which is absolutely­, categorica­lly and medically untrue) could cost her millions. Even if this absurd unfounded and unscientif­ic opinion just lingers in the subconscio­us of some insurance actuary or studio executive it could cost her and the studios themselves unnecessar­y millions.

    Pinsky needs to make a categorica­l and unequivoca­l public statement that his statement that “addiction is a lifelong disease” is nothing but 12-step bullshit, long demonstrat­ed by actual doctors to be untrue and furthermor­e is a libelous declaratio­n which he unreserved­ly retracts.

  88. Kim says:

    So he didnt say any of this. I thought it was taken out of context. Dr Drew doesnt usually say things so off. The media will skew ANYTHING to make it sound more interesting. What a shame.

  89. CB Rawks says:

    Out of context, my ass.

  90. redlips says:

    I love all the sanctimonious people on this thread who have NEVER said something and when it was repeated, it was so far from the words you ACTUALLY uttered, it made your head spin!! Gawd forbid if that ever happens to all you sanctimonious, perfect people!

    Dr. Drew is not a famewhore, does NOT need any PR and could give a rats patootie about any of the people he mentioned. I am sure that he was making comments when asked questions and those answers were taken completely out of context. He is certainly not riding on JP’s coat tails (as someone suggested)! That is laughable!!

    Reality, I have read all your post and I sincerely cosign all of them!

  91. Crash2GO2 says:

    Heheh. The video didn’t show her doing any drugs, because it was CUT. She was clearly all geared up for her turn, and then it cuts. Whatever.

  92. nnn says:

    Whamo thinks that it needs some people to say they sold Jolie drugs to make it true. Yeah tight.

    As for Jeniffer, she admitted smoking pot and doesn’t find anythinbg against it.

    As for this fraud as a doctor, he is the one who needs to be drug tested because clealy either he is mentally ill, either he is drugged out, eaither he stole his diploma or cheated or bribed for it. Cause there is noway that he is a professional who graduated fair and square.

    Besides his analogy is pure laughable in a country where the last three presidents, including the current one have ALL tested drugs. I guess they are still under some instability and at risk of erratic behaviour while running the most powerful country in the word.

  93. Rena says:

    I am sure that if the National Enq which first ran the over a decade old video had any real footage of Angelina doing drugs they would have run with it. Like they have with every other socalled exclusive they have trumpeted over the years. It is beyond sad that some people are so vested in the idea created by tabloid media of a bad woman that they refuse to open their eyes and see what is reality. No one is perfect, that is the human condition, and Angelina has never said she was or is perfect. But to continue an active campaign for almost 6 years to castigate a woman who is quite honest and open for being happy and in love with her life is beyond comprehension. Life is what it is. Some relationships just work and thrive while other relationships fail. All intelligent adults know this to be true.

    Dr Drew spoke truth when he said he did not know either Brad or Angelina and could not then make any diagnoses of any kind. He is an attention seeker of the worst kind, one who knows better but who has lost all his intergrity in his quest for fame. He has demonstrated that he cares nothing about helping anyone but himself.

    Almost 6 years and some still refuse to live their own lives and let others live theirs the best all can possibly do.

  94. Ally says:

    @ Lisa

    I think you’re confused, in no part of my post did I mention crazy fans or imply it.

    If you’re going to write a script defending you and your fellow zealots at least get your facts straight.

  95. TeeTee says:

    to think that Hollywood does not deal w/drug addicted stars making movies is
    infantile..

    Kelsey Grammar admitted to being hooked to pills and booze–He was never out of work–with Hollywood its what sells..

    I could name alot of celebs that have admitted to being under heavy drug influence and their PEOPLE were enablers. just like Brad is…

    for the rcord, I never want them to break up, I just hope she doesn’t actually hurt herself.

  96. Seeer says:

    Do people honestly, honestly believe Angelina is a heroin addict? Seriously? With the amount of travelling/work/children/publicity she has? Sure she’s skinny and could do with a few pounds but are her eyes glazed over, unfocused, anything but alert and clear?

    It’s one thing to dislike the woman but by God, some people need to get a grip. Labelling someone a heroin addict just because you can is a hitting way below the belt.

  97. N.D. says:

    @Reality have you actually seen that video or just have heard about it? It’s clearly not drug den as you claim because at some point camera moves and you see all the recording/filming equipment, it’s clearly some studio and it’s a some sort of (semi)professional situation, they’re filming and recording openly, they all are pretty sane and are having sensible discussion even if the topics are rather risky.

    here is the link for those who have not seen it, check it.

    http://vodpod.com/watch/4118141-angelina-jolie-drugs-video-shows-actress-talking-about-sex-and-killing-her-pets-from-heroin-to-heroine-the-sun-showbizbizarre

  98. nnn says:

    If Jolie is a drug addict, what does that make Johnny Depp, then ?

    Because the guy did cut himself too, had problems with his father, fought in hotel rooms and mainly did drugs thrice as much, thrice as long and had drugs, heroin, majijuana and all flowing in his viper club where his best friend at the times, River died. Hence there were an investigation in his club and the media lached out at him in the aftermarth of River Phoenix death making him responsible.

    It was ugly, since it was his close friend who died because of drugs, heroin flowing freerly in his club.

    So I am sure that he is even more an heroin addict to check closely since Jolie and her lighter history in the matter is. This according the same criteria applied by this Dr Whatsisname and the experts in here.

    Oh and his weird clothes choice and behaviour with young women point to high and lengthy consuption of drugs too, then.

    And i beleive him when he said once, that he was so drugged out at times, not knowing where he was and completely on a suicide watch that he was sure that he was going to die of an overdosis like River, at a young age.

    Lucky for him he met Vanessa at 35 and it was the reason why he stops not his early twenties like Jolie but in his mid thirties

    I am sure for the experts in here, that the drug and heroin from a 20 year addiction is still running hard in his body and we never know if he will show signs of unstability and break hotel rooms, flirts to closely with underage , ect…

    So Vanessa (who smoked pot too), beware of a nuclear split because of your ‘husband’ heavy drug history..(sarcasm).

    See, it’s so easy….

  99. DiMi says:

    It is only slander/libel/defamation if the information is false. Angelina has admitted publicly to being a drug user. It is never illegal to express one’s opinion about the future or one’s interpretation of somebody’s behavior.

    I don’t like Dr. Drew – I think he’s very sexist – but I do think he still has the – first amendment – right to his opinion. (I think everybody in the Jolie-Pitt-Aniston triangle is narcissistic and shallow so I’m not team Aniston either.)

    Is everybody on this site on Jolie’s payroll? Why do you worship her like this? She’s a human being who has made mistakes and has been a drug user and perhaps an addict.

  100. Cheyenne says:

    @DiMi: Angie has said she used drugs in the past. She has never said she is using them NOW, and Pinsky has no proof that she is. Yet, he is calling her a heroin addict as if she is still using drugs, when there is not a shred of evidence that this is the case. That, luv, is slander.

  101. rraven says:

    The thing is, Angelina Jolie is never going to be accepted by the majority of people. She is just too weird and that NYT article where they potrayed her as this manipulative person trying to control her image has sealed her fate in many ways, not to talk of being percieved as having stolen the husband of one of the nicest women in showbiz and turning him into a billy goat. Even my mother who doesn’t follow celebrity gossip, if a movie with AJ comes on still calls her a homewrecker etc and I live in West Africa, so her rep is virtually irredemable, I think. Yet I like her, even though she does tell huge whoppers.
    I’ve watched that drug den video and tbh she seemed like this uncool insecure person trying to impress some people she construes as cool, which at 22 or whatever age she was, I think she was obviously insecure and didn’t really know where her life was headed. On that video she also talks about adoption and s&m and she started talking about the pets when someone else brought up how her own pet died and Angie started talking about how
    she had unknowingly left some pet lizards in the sun and they died and how some rabbits or something she fed something to that they weren’t supposed to have, all these when she was about 7. I’ve seen websites where this has been used in an unholy trifecta to say she’s a psycho.

  102. N.D. says:

    Have you seen this video of him saying that shit he’s supposedly appologizing about now?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unBOOlIPT30

    He can’t claim his remarks weren’t mean for general public as he was on TV when he made them. And they definitely ain’t taken out of any context that could change their meaning.

    He’s unprofessional douchebag.

  103. Freya says:

    TeeTee (#21), first tell us what “beleive” means!

  104. Kim says:

    RRaven – Angie is accepted and admired globally . She may not be accepted by the tabloid reading public or the woman who act like Brad dumped them. Angelina earns $20 Million a film, is a UN Ambassador,has been praised by Colin Powell, is on the Council of Foriegn Relations, is regularly on the list of influential woman, was on Fortune and Hollywood Reporter,is regularly nominated for awards by her peers and the public,an Oscar Winner,the only actress on VF establishment list, second actress after Sandy on EW most powerful list,often on most admired celebs list, Guinesss Book of Records most powerful actress for three years in a row, 3 times on Time Magazine Influential list. As for DR Drew he is a liar he recorded a TV show that will be aired on ReelzChannel called “Uncensored’ where he says on the show the same thing he said in the article. I saw a clip of the show last night He said when Brad and Angie break up it’s going to be like the fighting scenes in Mr and Mrs Smith. So he is also implying that there is domestic violence in their relationship.

  105. anon says:

    @Kim well said, excellent post 🙂

  106. Cheyenne says:

    rraven: The thing is, Angelina Jolie is never going to be accepted by the majority of people.
    =======================================

    And who is the “majority of the people”? What people are you talking about? The Boo-Hoo Sisterhood? If you think Angie cares about being accepted by those losers, you’d better think again.

  107. truthzbetta says:

    @ 101

    Condescension, Luv, steers you wrong. There has to be a falsehood to prove slander.

    Many doctors consider a person to be an addict for life because of several factors including the way the use of heroin changes the neurochemistry of the brain. What he said was a professional theory based on currently available data. He said that an addict is either using, in recovery, etc. but never an “ex” addict.

    So you’re just plain wrong.

    Sorry, you cannot sue a therapist for stating a common and prevailing theory esp. when he admits there are many unknowns about her life.

    If you feel the urge to stay nice and mad there is a solution. You can just fret and whine over his prediction since future telling is definitely not a science. Whine on, crazy diamond.

  108. lynn says:

    i know everybody’s on the dr. drew hate train right now, and while i can totally understand that because this whole charade was a really bad move, i don’t agree that he’s a complete waste of a person.

    i worked on mtv’s “sex with mom and dad”, (the show title that has proved to be resume gold for me), and had the opportunity to watch drew counsel several teens and their parents. Each session was shaved down to 2 or 3 minutes for airtime, but in reality, each meeting was 2 or 3 hours. I had to go through all of the footage, and he honestly spent quality time with these families and helped them reach actual, if not tangible, resolutions to their problems. There was a great deal of care, sensitivity and professionalism that went into their therapy.

    With that said, I can’t look at him and completely dismiss him as a person or a doctor. I know this incident was stupid and wasn’t in good taste at all, but I have to say he’s not a horrible person.

  109. skibunny says:

    Hilarious thread! All the legal jargin and righteous idignation!!! Ha Ha. I wonder if he were calling Jennifer Aniston a heroin addict if the sun would be shining out of Dr. Drew’s arse. Sorry cant help but comment on the hypocrisy.

  110. Kara says:

    his apology amounts to this: “I’ve never met you, but you ARE an addict, you will always be miserable, you will suffer a HORRIBLE split, and I will (probably) laugh at your pain. I’m not sorry I said it–just that my comments made ME look bad. Oh, and Merry Christmas!!!”
    __________________________________
    Perfectly stated and very funny!

    I agree the attitude in his comments seemed very mean and spiteful–almost as if he had spent Thanksgiving in Cabo bitching about Jolie with Chelsea Handler and Jennifer Aniston. haha

  111. Athena says:

    Eh. None of the people he talks about (who have lives) care what he says. Lindsay Lohan on the other hand…

  112. Brenda says:

    Sadly, he is probably right.
    Angelina just switches addictions. Men, babies, humanitarian causes etc.
    I imagine there will be a very interesting Mommy Dearest story twenty years from now coming from Jollie-Pitt crew.

  113. Du Hast Mich says:

    I hope he dies of bone and skin cancer holding on to life till he’s 40 pounds. And we all come to pity him and stick dollar bills in his mouth before we leave.

  114. CB Rawks says:

    Umm-ahh.