Duchess Kate’s ‘Marilyn moments’ & flyaway hair analyzed in new article

wenn21098798

Duchess Kate got to get dressed up and attend a gala reception at Buckingham Palace last night. She and the Queen cohosted (?) an event for RADA honoring Helen Mirren. Unfortunately, the photo above is the only one we have, and you can’t even see Kate’s dress. But don’t worry. Kate repeated the red McQueen she wore in 2012 for the Queen’s Super-Royal Jubilee Boat Regatta Thing (I forget the real name of it, but you can see the old photos here). The Mail has the photos from last night here – Kate wore her hair down and she got to interact with Helen Mirren and other actors. Her skirt did not blow up although she did play with her security blanket hair a lot.

Speaking of her security blanket hair, Mclean’s (the Canadian weekly current affairs mag) ran an analysis piece last week about Kate and her hair and her styling issues. This was not some lovey-dovey propaganda piece either. It was an analysis of how Kate is becoming known more for her wardrobe malfunctions and her security-blanket hair rather than her work ethic or anything else. You can read the full piece here (Lainey at LaineyGossip is quoted), and here are some highlights:

Last June, on her last public outing before delivering a future king, Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, visited a windy English shipyard. As the wind gusted and blew, she struggled to keep her short dalmatian-print coat dress from flying open, only to lose the battle at the most crucial moment—while christening the new cruise ship. “How many times can one duchess get her skirts blown up by the wind?” The Daily Beast’s Tom Sykes grumbled. The incident was soon forgotten in the excitement over Prince George’s arrival, but the missteps picked up again soon enough—and so did the gibes.

After Kate’s short Orla Kiely skirt went skyward at London’s Docklands in November, London’s Daily Mail dubbed the duchess of Cambridge “weighty Katy,” suggesting she needed to weigh down the hems of her skirts to avoid more “Marilyn moments.” The Mirror seized on her “wardrobe malfunction” during a charity visit, while Radar Online bemoaned the “royal gust” that resulted in spectators and photographers alike getting an unexpected peak at those toned thighs (documented for posterity on a Pinterest board named Royal Gust of Wind).

In fact, during Kate’s 30 daytime public events in 2013, there were four unforced errors (13 per cent of the total), including a mid-thigh Moloh coat dress, whose back pleats went flying as she played table tennis with William at a Scottish community centre. For a royal, particularly one in her position, that’s a high faux pas rate. And that’s saying nothing of the fly-away tresses.

…Her most famous lapse occurred during the Cambridges’ inaugural tour to Canada in 2011. As she greeted a flower girl on the windswept tarmac of Calgary’s airport, the flowing skirt of her thin, yellow silk dress was blown high enough to raise alarms to Defcon 2, while her hair was a tangled mess. The next day, when she and William returned to the airport, she was awkwardly holding down the back of yet another full-skirted outfit. This was a novice duchess, of course, unused to tarmac weather patterns. But a year later, as if on Groundhog Day, she repeated the experience, exiting a plane in Brisbane, Australia.

One solution would be a slimmer skirt, such as the ones Kate wore during her visit to socially conservative Malaysia and Singapore. But Kate’s more typical look—she wears her skirts short and/or flowing, and her locks long and loose—was set in concrete a decade ago while dating William. “It’s the blue-eyeshadow syndrome,” says Joyce Gunhouse, co-owner and co-designer of Comrags, a Toronto-based clothing retailer, referring to the tendency to still wear in your 50s the style that looked great in your youth. “Each time, I’m more surprised,” says Susan Kelley of the popular What Kate Wore blog. “I’m sure that, someday, she’ll have to realize she can’t wear that silhouette.”

For Kate, the problem is partly geometry. She’s five foot nine and likes wearing towering heels. So when a little girl presents her with a floral bouquet, Kate is forced into an awkward quasi-squat-curtsey to avoid bending down at a revealingly steep angle. Wearing fitted trousers, popular with European young royals, doesn’t appear to be an option. Though Kate wears jeans to casual, sporty events, she’s never seen in dress pants; like all Windsor women, she “takes her cues from the boss,” states CNN royal contributor Victoria Arbiter, referring to the Queen, who doesn’t wear pants in public.

Royal guidelines extend to hairstyles, too. By pulling their hair back or up, and keeping it shoulder-length, most of Kate’s peers suffer few of the turmoils that afflict her own, much longer tresses. At formal evening events, her flowing style can overwhelm her face and hide her jewellery. As veteran royal blogger Ella Kay notes, “It would great to see her show off those pieces a bit more by sweeping her hair back.” She was roundly criticized on the Internet for twirling her long locks back into ringlets during a solemn Remembrance Sunday ceremony. “She seems like a bored, uninterested teenager,” said one blogger.

Elaine Lui, a reporter for CTV’s Etalk who has the popular Lainey Gossip website, sympathizes. “I have long, thick hair, too. When I’m on shoots, we have to retake five times because it’s flying all over the place.” Yet, like other royal watchers, Lui believes Kate won’t break her loose hair habit: It’s a security blanket she uses to get through the stress of public events. “There are times when it’s everywhere, and you want to brush it out of her face,” says CNN’s Arbiter. “You’d think it was driving her mad, yet she loves it.”

[From Maclean’s]

There’s more stuff in the article about how she needs to put weights in her skirts and the end of the article is basically like, “Well, she’s not in a hurry to fix these problems, so oh well.” My feeling is that Kate just does what she can get away with. You know what I mean? So far, the Queen hasn’t put her foot down about the exhibitionism or the constant hair-touching and too-young sausage curls. As soon as someone – like the Queen, or Charles, or Camilla or even William – says enough is enough and tells her to cut it out, she will. Incidentally, a famous British hairdresser just recently said (publicly) that Kate is in desperate need of a haircut and that she should take off a good six inches. Oh… that would be very interesting.

wenn21076921

wenn21098735

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

185 Responses to “Duchess Kate’s ‘Marilyn moments’ & flyaway hair analyzed in new article”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lark says:

    I agree with what a few people say in this…I sympathize a bit with Kate over her hair, because I have long, super thick hair that basically falls apart whenever I try to pin it up. At the same time, like Lainey said, it’s obviously a security blanket for her. Why doesn’t she just pull it half back? That would solve most of the issues. As far as her clothing—the short, floaty dresses do seem rather casual and almost collegiate. She could easily replace those outfits with pencil skirts

    • LadyMTL says:

      I sympathize too, even though I have medium length fine hair, lol. In my case I find that people get on her case really quickly because she doesn’t fit a prototype that they might have of what a “princess” should look like / how she should dress.

      That said, I do wish she would be a bit more careful with her skirts…I don’t care who she is but I have zero desire to see her tea and crumpets. If she wants to stick with the floaty skirt look then at least make them longer, or weigh the hems down. It’s a simple fix.

      • tc says:

        Really? I think the only reason William married her is because she fits the ideal of “what a princess should look like.” He can’t have chosen her for her brains or personality, that’s for sure.

      • Tara says:

        We don’t know her personality. Only the flashes of her public persona. I would guess she is not solving biochemical equations in that little head of hers but I don’t know and I know less about her personality.

      • My2Pence says:

        We have a few glimpses into her personality and character, from people who knew/know her:

        Didn’t Uncle Gary publicly state that she was a “plodder”?

        A biographer called her a cold, dull, serious girl.

        Her former boss said she wasn’t exactly committed to the job.

        She was unremarkable throughout her years of schooling, with many teachers unable to remember anything about her.

        I also remember a quote from a former teacher who said something about how they doubted she had ever cracked a book.

        A cousin is on record saying Kate Middleton struggles to pay attention to and find other people interesting.

      • Tara says:

        Pence,
        You used the word glimpse and that’s about it. Uncle Gary will say whatever will keep him in the tabs. As for former school teachers, just because you weren’t an outgoing, popularly memorable shining star doesn’t mean you lacked a personality or had a bad one. There are also former school mates who are quoted as saying that Kate had a “goofy” sense of humor and came “alive” on the athletic field. Her good grades do not equal personality, as you know, I’m sure. Diana was “thick as a plank” and had a stellar personality. At any rate Kate’s grades got her accepted into Edinborough and St. andrews.
        During her last year before gap year she and her boyfriend made the school’s unofficial top ten best couples, voted on by the students.
        At St. andrews she was popular and was considered the prettiest incoming first year girl in her hall.this was before the infamous underwear catwalk trick and before she was William’s girlfriend. She and William were known for having wonderful, casual dinner parties with great conversation and meals cooked by her and her girlfriend.
        Wharry and his friends used to laugh at her and her parents’ humbler beginnings but over time came to be quite fond and protective of her.
        Neighbors in Anglesey reported that she was charming and unassuming, waving to them on long walks with her dog.
        Nothing you say and nothing I can say is proof of anything. One media outlet says one thing and another will contradict it. It is only a glimpse, you know.

      • annieanne says:

        I wouldn’t be at all surprised if a big part of the whole “the Queen lending her the help of her dresser” was making sure all her skirts are well weighted down.

      • vava says:

        Oh I don’t sympathize with her one bit! Is it too much to ask for her to get her hair under control?

  2. MooHoo says:

    I admire her to just sticking with what she is comfortable with and taking no notice of fashion nazis.

    • Badirene says:

      I don’t think people are being fashion nazis, they just have nothing else to talk about with her, if she worked at her charities they could talk about that instead of hair and clothes.

      • Angelic 21 says:

        Plus expecting Kate to stop flashing her legs,thighs and underwear while they represent your country is not being a fashion nazi but rather having common sense.

      • Original N says:

        Yes – for many of us, it is frustration regarding repeated fashion mistakes that are easily solved yet continue & are unprofessional to say the least. The frustration also exists because of squandered possibility … That is, if I were in the position of KM, I would be at animal shelters, animal charities, charities for children, encouraging and educating people regarding nutrition and its crucial effects upon cognitive development, etc. to give voices to those that cannot speak for themselves with at least an engagement a day M-F, given the new mum status, because I am passionate about those endeavors, because I believe that people, when they work together, CAN make change happen. In essence, the public would know what topics ARE important to me … and it would not be clothes, hair, or jewelry.

        Angelic – you missed bare bottom! Remember the tarmac photos from Canada… 🙂

      • FLORC says:

        Original N.
        She flashed us twice on a tarmac. Once in a yellow dress and once in a flower print dress, because a tarmac is the perfect location to wear a short, flowy dress with only a thong (if anything) underneath with loads of cameras.

      • bluhare says:

        I think William should dump Kate and marry you, Original N. You can hire me to be your lady in waiting.

      • Original N says:

        @bluhare
        blu, I would work beside you in a minute! My only prerequisites: willingness to work tirelessly to ensure all children have healthy starts (good nutrition & early education for children AND for pregnant mums-to-be/new mums), willingness to fight against factory farming through promotion of new regulations that require ethical treatment of all animals that are ENFORCED and public education of how shopping local and supporting local farms that humanely kill their animals (so the fear-induced hormones released upon death are minimized: factory farming = massive slaughters = more aggression observed in society: correlational or causational?) is better for everyone in the long term (because I know I will never be able to convert everyone to a vegetarian lifestyle *wink*) … and lots, lots, lots of time spent helping out at animal shelters (publicity-free! omg! actual secret charity work!) where we give the staff a break and do some of the dirty work ourselves. Are you up for the job?

        That said: 1) I am likely too educated for the royal family and 2) Eventually, I would probably be found somewhere in the palace with Harry if he were so willing so I’m probably not the best one for the job! 🙂

      • bluhare says:

        Still think we should give it a go, N. Besides, wouldn’t anyone be found somewhere in the palace with Harry if they could?

      • Green Girl says:

        I like your style, N!

        I don’t think anyone expects Kate to work 60+ hour weeks (and then she’d have the criticism of working “too much”!), but she can definitely up her schedule a bit. If she worked all day three days a week, it would be enough to improve her image and still give her time to shop or whatever.

        And I am so so tired of these fashion missteps with her. Once, even twice, I can forgive. But to do it repeatedly just looks sloppy.

      • LAK says:

        Original N/Bluhare: ……but that will not do! you’ve left no time for the 9 (ten days long) annual vacations, the thrice weekly 2-3hr grooming sessions etc. Your schedule is much too strenuous for a duchess.

    • Jaded says:

      It’s not a fashion Nazi thing – it’s called showing some dignity, respect and protocol. In her public position, and given her age, hair-blowing and twirling, skin-tight jeggings where you can practically count her p*bic hair, super short flowy dresses that fly up like a tissue, are not the least bit exemplary of her age and status. Time to grow up Kate.

      • CynicalCeleste says:

        The jeggings are ridiculous. Especially worn with five inch high wedge heels. just because you top them with a smythe jacket, jeggings are still in no way appropriate attire for official functions.

    • bluhare says:

      Moohoo, Kate is representing the British head of state. The Queen. Would you expect someone representing the US head of state to wear clothing that flies everywhere?

    • P.J. says:

      @Moohoo: So, in essence, what you’re saying is that this 30-something royal who is married to the heir of the British throne is happily “comfortable” with wearing mini skirts that are constantly flying up in public and everyone should just let her be as long as that’s what she likes? Uhh…

    • My2Pence says:

      She also appears to be regressing in the clothing department. Aside from the flashing at the airport in Canada, she had other outfits on that tour that were appropriate and didn’t fly up. Her clothing choices now are more juvenile than ever (many would look age-appropriate on a six year old) and yet these outfits are more sexualized than ever (mini skirts, flying up hems, etc.).

    • Schnee says:

      Yes! Thank you. She is a young woman with incredible hair (it might be dyed, but still!).

      I am her age and still wear it long and layered just like she does – and I work in a professional academic environment. It thinks it’s great she is sticking to her vavavoom hemlines and mermaid her. She is beautiful and showing it. Work it, girl!

      It just might be one of the few things she can actually express herself with. Everything else – appearances, where she is allowed to vacation and when, what she can say in speeches and interviews, where she can live and stay – is controlled by the family she married into, aka the royal family. It don’t want her to succumb to depression, anorexia et al like so many other princesses have whose lives have been unbearably controlled. You stay with the style you like, Catherine!

      • My2Pence says:

        Does your job have a dress and performance code? Are you required to adhere to office protocol and speak the “party line” while at work? Why do people insist that the evil royal family is oppressing poor little Kate Middleton?

        All that people are asking is that she dress appropriately (including styling her hair) in a more professional manner. It isn’t denying her the right to express herself. She works a handful of hours per week. In all of her free shopping time, she can dress however she likes. She is not being oppressed like Masako or vilified like Letizia. Just tie the mane back, lower the hems, and act more appropriately while on the taxpayer-funded job.

      • CynicalCeleste says:

        How about expressing herself through a passionate interest, a philanthropic cause or really anything of substance that might demonstrate she has half a brain or a concern for the world around her, rather than merely expressing herself through hair and short skirts? Just a thought.

  3. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I just don’t get it. Weight your hems. It’s such a simple solution. I don’t quite get the Kate Hate, but on this issue, I get really frustrated. When you keep repeating the same mistake and there’s a simple solution at hand, I start to wonder if you’re doing it on purpose. Yet that seems so unlike her. She seems to want to project this perfect princess image. I am mystified.

    • Suze says:

      It would be so easy to fix. Weight your hems or wear skirts slightly longer and more fitted. Tie your hair back ! You don’t have to cut it or even wear it up! Just pull it away for official engagements. And that’s the key here – for official engagements only. No need to change your style one iota for your private life.

      I don’t get it either. It’s weird as heck and it has to be deliberate at this point.

      All royals make some adjustments to their public appearance to do their job. It’s asking very little for the amount that is given to them.

      • FLORC says:

        Many of the stores she buys from will install the weighted hems before delivery to your home. And if you like to do it yourself they sell the weights in store.

        As a side comment I was wondering if whenever she cuts her she would donate it to charity. Then I remembered her hair is naturally thinner and she’d be caught.
        The gesture would still be nice.

      • Tara says:

        Does Will keep her from reading blogs and tabs? No, so she is aware of this problem.

      • CynicalCeleste says:

        Exactly

      • My2Pence says:

        @FLORC. Yes that would be lovely if she did donate her hair, except as you pointed out, so little of it is actually hers. You’re also usually not able to donate if you color treat your hair or if it is cut in layers. They require X amount of length (all the same length) when it is bound up in a pony tail or braid. I have a long-time co-worker who has donated her hair a couple of times and the rules are strict.

      • FLORC says:

        My2Pence
        Hmm….
        Lots of rules indeed! I forgot about the color treatment. She is quite gray at this point.
        Personally I’d love to see her rock the grays! I do and i’m only 4 years younger than her.

      • Belle says:

        Not sure if the rules are different for different hair charities, but Locks of Love accepts color treated hair, just not bleached hair. Also, I believe they accept layered hair as well, though the shorter pieces are probably sorted out for occasional times when they make a shorter wig. They also sell some of the extra hair they can’t use to help cover other costs.

        My daughters have both donated to Locks of Love more than once, and while neither has color treated hair, or layers, the FAQ page on the website answers most of these questions.

      • Shay says:

        Different organizations have different rules. Some won’t take dyed hair. Some will take gray hair. Most won’t take bleached hair (the only one I know that will take bleached hair is the Little Princess Trust). Most will take layers, as long as the longest layer satisfies the required length. I’ve only donated my hair to Locks of Love once, but I’m thinking of doing it again soon, however, this time it’ll have to be with the Little Princess Trust since my hair is bleached.

  4. Jericho says:

    Same old, same old. “Kate is an immature, lazy and uncouth brat and no one is willing to put her in time out (yet).”

  5. Kali says:

    A fun game to play while reading articles about the Duchess – “what would YOU do with Kate Middleton’s hair?”. Seriously, that’s killed about a good 10 minutes for me.

    • bluhare says:

      Daily Mail did just that last week. They had their Kate lookalike pose in different hair styles.

      • Kali says:

        Oooohhh, just found that article! I really love that first hairstyle with the braid in it. Far too “hippy” for her though.

    • Tara says:

      Cut away 21/4″ and give her an off center mini part. Long bangs smoothed and placed behind the ears. Mock croc embossed headbands, a slightly bumped crown and let the back do what it will (in layers). This plus lipstain in raisin or deep terracotta, perfect for brunettes. Oh, and chocolate eyeliner instead of black applied conservatively and blended with the pinky finger (resulting body heat and skin’s own oils do wonders).
      Phew.

  6. Aria says:

    Too much press hate towards this girl lately….uuummm….

    • Bodhi says:

      Lately? Where have you been? People have been talking shit about her for YEARS

      • bluhare says:

        People have, yes. But the British press not so much. Lately it seems that William, Kate and now Harry are fair game. I don’t get it.

      • Original N says:

        ^ This is what has me perplexed!

      • Tara says:

        Well, the palace should have never authorised those Hello pics and they should have taught Will how to be polite to the press.

    • Jaded says:

      It’s not press hate, it’s her acting and dressing like she’s still 19. For her role she should be out daily, dressed appropriately and respectfully, visiting charities, hospitals, and taking part in an active and useful career with the firm, not faffing around in tart-wear playing with her hair.

    • CynicalCeleste says:

      You know, I started off at the wedding being a bit of a fan girl, but after a certain amount of time, the gloss is revealed to be, just that – gloss. a higher standard of form, behaviour, duty and passion for her role is expected from someone who has been granted so much privilege. in her position she could be achieving so much, if only she had the interest, the acumen and the spark for taking action. instead, after 3 years of contributing nothing but smiles, flowy skirts and flashes of undies, and all the tiresome hair touching, luxe holidays and weekly shopping, shopping, shopping… It’s just disappointing. And i think a lot of people feel that way and the media is starting to reflect some of that disappointment.

  7. kay says:

    Lainey must like Kate or maybe she’s just censored herself due to the standards of the magazine. Kate wouldn’t get an easy ride on Lainey’s web site, that’s for sure.

    • vangroovey says:

      I have a theory about this. It’s just a gossip theory. But, like you said, Lainey lets her opinions fly about everyone…but she does seem to “reign” it in when it comes to the Windsors. My guess: She wants to get an interview one day. And when it comes to the “royals”, she has to keep her Windsor opinions somewhat positive if that is ever to be a possibility.

      • Suze says:

        She flat out sucks up to them. Her posts on royalty are ridiculously sugary.

      • caitlin says:

        Agree with Suze and I’d also add that what she says on her web site is like night and day when you compare it to what she says to the press or on her show “The Social”.

        On her web site, she does not hold back and calls a spade a spade, using profanity freely. If she’s on tv – especially E-Talk – she sucks up big time whenever she is interviewing a celebrity even if it’s someone she’s previously mocked and denegrated on her Lainey web site. Hypocrite.

      • Bridget says:

        She likes the royals. I sincerely doubt she thinks she’s ever getting an interview with them. People are allowed to have their soft spots.

        Though I do enjoy that someone thinks it’s hypocrical that she’s polite and doesn’t swear at her job at eTalk. That’s her JOB. To get the interview, to do the segment. With entertainment reporting, that requires being nice to the person you’re interviewing and not swearing, since that’s kind of frowned on when you’re on TV. That’s like asking why Mario Lopez doesn’t actually hit on every woman he interviews for Extra – he may do that in normal life, but he at least understands there are expectations of how you behave when you do your job (at least, if you don’t want to be fired).

      • Suze says:

        @Bridget

        I agree that Lainey likes royals and that is why her coverage of them is so – soft, shall we say? It’s definitely not of the variety she graces other celebrities with.

        I will say that I think she is way off base on most of her coverage of them. She is pretty good at sussing out the bullshit lots of celebs get away with, but she doesn’t seem to have the same laser focus when she does royal coverage. I think she’s a bit out of her depth there.

        That said, the royals aren’t the only ones she give a pass to – she’s pretty soft on Matt Damon and Hugh Jackman, among others.

      • Bridget says:

        I guess I always got the impression that Lainey liked Kate but wasn’t the most devoted of royal watchers. Its not like that would be my first stop for royals coverage, you know? Though she is spot-on about Andrew (and even Albert of Monaco).

    • bluhare says:

      Oh yes she does! Lainey’s posts on Kate are almost always gushing.

  8. Original N says:

    Firstly, this article provides evidence and support for what LAK & FLORC keep explaining regarding wardrobe issues with hemlines, the need for weights, etc. and what other posters [Vava, I think?] have remarked upon regarding the inappropriately high heels and thus, inability to stand with proper posture due to towering over the people, particularly children, she is speaking with at an event, etc.

    Secondly, I take issue with this: “Though Kate wears jeans to casual, sporty events, she’s never seen in dress pants; like all Windsor women, she “takes her cues from the boss,” states CNN royal contributor Victoria Arbiter, referring to the Queen, who doesn’t wear pants in public.” It is true that KM has worn jeans to casual, sporty events; however, I take issue with the fact that the author implies her clothing has been appropriate for those events. Four-inch wedge heels paired with jeans and short tops to play volleyball isn’t exactly following the precedent set by the Queen nor should it be considered appropriate for a sporting event!

    • vava says:

      totally agree with you on all counts. Her jeans for OFFICIAL outings are completely inappropriate as well. Jeans would be fine if they weren’t sprayed on to show every muscle. She apparently has to sexualize everything.

      She seems immature.

    • FLORC says:

      Original N.
      Don’t forget LadySlippers, Sachi, Mich, Bluhare, and many more!

      And she doesn’t wear jeans. She wears Jeggins! Such an awful thing Jeggins are. Stretchy thick tights imo. And i’m not age shaming anyone. I just feel there are certain items of clothing you shouldn’t wear after you’re out of your 20’s. Jeggins are one of them.

      And if you take note Kate’s hemlines get shorter and tightness of pants only increase when William is present.

      I just want to sleek her hair back in a ponytail or bun, put her in a nice and flattering dress suit and heels no higher than 2 inches. She would look amazing and could conduct herself better without worry of fly-ups.

      • Original N says:

        @FLORC – Apologies! I did not mean for it to seem like I was singling you or LAK out; I just remembered you both specifically posting on the skirt-fly-up issue on the last KM thread & did not want to misquote anyone else (e.g. that is why I put Vava’s name with a question mark because I thought it was her that mentioned how inappropriate the footwear was for the job of greeting children, how the high heels affect KM’s posture, etc. but I couldn’t remember for certain).

        Are they really jeggings?! I thought they were just really well-fitted/tailored skinny jeans!

      • LAK says:

        Original N: they are jeggings.

      • LadySlippers says:

        Thank Florc! Lol

        Original N just needs to hang out with all of the CB Royal Loonies to see the depth and breadth we cover.

        😀

      • FLORC says:

        No worries Original N. There are lots of us!

      • CynicalCeleste says:

        FLORC I totally agree and made a jeggings comment above before I saw this.

    • vava says:

      Yeah, I think lots of posters are of the same opinion about Kate.

      FLORC, I wear jeggings myself, and I’m older than Kate. The difference is that I style them so I’m not showing the world my rear and crotch. LOL. Also, I would never wear them to a professional presentation or appearance, they are strictly casual wear. Anyway, I just wanted to give a different point of view on jeggings. 🙂

      • FLORC says:

        Vava
        Yes. They are casual wear. I still wear them, but am still in my 20’s (barely).
        Never to be worn on duty. And my personal preference is that trousers are far more flattering. Fitted, yet loose.

      • bluhare says:

        I’m positively ancient and I’ve worn them. Yes, I still have good legs or else I wouldn’t have done it!! I did not wear them out on any professional-type endeavours though.

        I also covered my bum. No one needs to see that. Ever. 🙂

    • LadySlippers says:

      I actually have several issues with the article (I’m sure if I read the whole thing I’d have more):

      1) While Kate hasn’t worn dress pants, HM actually HAS. Not often but she’s worn dress pants, following knee surgery, for example. Sophie and Anne have also worn pants — on official engagements too! (Google the Wessex’s trip to Gibraltar for HM’s Diamond Jubilee)

      2) Kate is 5’7″ish. Someone thought 5’6″ which I can buy. I’m 5’10” and I still stand barefoot taller than she does in heels next to my 6’2″ son.

      3) Diana commented often about the need to dress appropriately. She made rare errors and promptly fixed them. There were weights in shirts, long skirts (especially when visiting children so children wouldn’t see her knickers), low heels (except later when she was thumbing the RF), well coiffed hair and so on.

      4) Kate wears jeggings that are too small. Jeans can look nice (just ask Stacey & Clinton). Perhaps Stacey & Clinton would consider doing a Royal version of What Not to Wear. One can hope, yes? 🙂

      Sorry, I know some people have covered this. Lol

      • Green Girl says:

        About #3: What’s interesting to me is that Diana was so much younger when she got married and started making public appearances. And yet, she figured out what was appropriate or at least had a staff member who could clue her in.

      • LadySlippers says:

        @Green Girl: Diana was highly embarrassed by the ‘innocent’ pics taken of her and the two children she nannied. It’s the infamous one where the sun showed through her skirt and backlit her legs. She was 19 and had no handlers. She made another Royal fashion misstep with the black dress post engagement. But her goofs were rarely repeated (she did have another one years later where her bra was visible but it didn’t look like it until the harsh glare of the flashes ‘revealed’ it).

        Honest goofs we all get — we’ve all been there and done that. It’s the stuff common sense should tell her not to do again that has a lot of us puzzled.

  9. yolie says:

    Wearing her hair in a ponytail once in awhile wouldn’t hurt her…..

    • FLORC says:

      She does. After these events she’s caught shopping and her hair is put in a very cute ponytail professionally done.

      • bluhare says:

        I don’t know why she doesn’t try a head band. Or a clip of some type for a low pony. I think low pony tail with a clip would look great. And imagine the clips she could have.

  10. Suze says:

    I find it astounding that, after three years in the public spotlight, this is all people ever write about regarding the duchess.

    Hair and skirt length. It’s starting to get tedious.

    • Mich says:

      What else is there to write about? She is truly just that boring.

      • Sullivan says:

        She is royalty’s Jennifer Aniston. Hair, clothes, womb.

      • balehead2012 says:

        “She is royalty’s Jennifer Aniston. Hair, clothes, womb.”
        @sullivan: LOL, you’ve really said it 🙂

      • bluhare says:

        And thank god we won’t be on Bump Alert when she hits her 40’s.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @bluhare
        She spared us bump alert, because she already had one…thank God.

        On that note, I’m starting to believe the rumors that Sibi Bale is pregnant…either that or that was an unfortunate choice in a dress to the baftas #justsayin’

    • vava says:

      Well there isn’t much else to say about her. Her speeches certainly aren’t newsworthy….

      • Suze says:

        @vava, mich

        I totally agree. The thing is, you think she would start to tire of it. And to fix it is not so very hard. Get your hair under control and wear appropriate clothes to your appearances.

      • Mich says:

        @ Suze

        IKR?! I don’t get it either. It would take SO little for her to become even modestly adored/respected and yet she absolutely doesn’t seem to care that she is viewed as vapid, boring, lacking in decorum, and lazy. Of all the things to be stubborn about in life, she has chosen the most shallow.

      • bluhare says:

        I feel for her in the speech department. I do. I think she’s terrified.

      • Suze says:

        @bluhare – I feel for her, too. I was terrified of speechifying when I first had to give presentations.

        But this aspect of her job is not going away. Not ever. And she has the resources to get the very best help available to make it all go a little more smoothly.

    • Angelic 21 says:

      That’s our duchess only known for her clothes and hairs and baby producing abilities (you forgot that 1). Isn’t she great and aren’t we lucky to have her as a role model for every girl in the world. Can you imagine if everyone takes her as role model, do nothing before getting married and then become famous for hairs, clothes and giving birth. World be such a great place when everyone looks at who shall not be criticized you jealous hater as a role model. I feel so proud and humbled to have the privilege of paying for her expensive life just so she can look pretty,smile and give birth.

      • Mrsjennyk says:

        “World be such a great place when everyone looks at who shall not be criticized you jealous hater as a role model.”

        What?…

    • mercy says:

      Suze, when I heard Will was marrying a commoner , I thought that they hired her to bring some fresh air, some common sense, some down-to-earth attitude.
      After all this time I have to say we didn’t see anything of that. She is involved in the same vapid activities of the old aristocracy but without showing the same class and allure. Maybe it depends on the fact she never had to work one single day in her life. And she had one single interest in her life, i.e. landing the prince.
      I suspect there is nothing to write and talk about her apart from her being inappropriate in many occasions.

      • bluhare says:

        You and me both, mercy. It was so disappointing to find out she doesn’t appear to want to be that breath of fresh air and would rather rest on her (now royal) laurels.

    • caitlin says:

      Suze, I feel the same way. Although I long for the day (a cold one in h*ll) when a CB post is all about Kate’s charity work and other meaningful activities, that will not happen in my lifetime.

      Funny how royals who do work tirelessly and consistently pull their weight are never featured, much less praised and glorified. I guess people like Sophie Wessex and Princess Anne are too boring and wouldn’t generate the same volume of comments. Seriously, if Kate did not have the royal title and connections, no one would give a toss about her hair or clothes. Without the royal factor, she’s a “nobody” with average looks, lacklustre personality and zero accomplishments to her name.

      • Suze says:

        Well, that is a good point. Sophie Wessex and the Princess Royal don’t generate much interest. Would we lose interest in Kate if she were to wear her hair back, keep her dresses down and just go about her business?

      • Mich says:

        Sophie is not married to the future King of England. That is the difference.

    • Jocelyn says:

      Well if you think about it,what else is there to write concerning her?

    • Jaded says:

      There’s nothing else to write about – she’s a vapid, lazy woman who still thinks and dresses like she’s a teenager.

    • LadySlippers says:

      People forget that for a very long time hair and clothes was all that was written about Diana too. And she did work more so Kate working more might not fix it entirely.

      I honestly think that it’s a terrible bind certain women find themselves in. However the difference is Diana wanted to be known for more than a clothes horse. So far, Kate has given us no indication that she is anything but a clothes horse.

      • caitlin says:

        Exactly. Diana was admired and criticized for her clothes and style, but at the end of the day, she was more than her clothes. She was genuine and hardworking as well as charismatic. Kate lacks these qualities – full stop.

      • Sachi says:

        I think this is a very good point, LadySlippers. Michelle Obama was also expected to dress like other First Ladies and Hilary still gets the odd article about her pantsuits and scrunchies.

        Most royal women are expected to dress like an old-school royal. A respected journalist in Spain once wrote that Letizia was very upset when she was a new Princess because all the Spanish media would focus on were her clothes and other superficial aspects of her life, and not her work. She wanted people to see her as a working princess/royal and not a clotheshorse. The sad thing is that the Spanish Royal House has deliberately refused to promote her in order to boost up the born-royals’ popularity at Letizia’s expense. She has a lot to offer and shows up the Borbons every time she gives a speech for her causes. Her patronages speak very highly of her and always mention the raised awareness and contributions since Letizia became their patron. But these positives don’t get highlighted in the press because they’re too busy criticizing her clothes and facial expressions to make up rumours and malicious info about her.

        Queen Maxima often wears clothes that defy description. But people don’t mind because Maxima actually works, has an ebullient personality that puts people at ease, and has championed microfinance as a royal. She may wear ugly clothes from time to time but it’s not that “important” when people talk about her because her work always comes first and gets considered.

        Kate is the opposite. There’s nothing that defines her except her hair, her eyeliner, her marriage to William, and her son. Nobody knows what her real personality is like because it never shows up in events. Nobody can say exactly what she experts in and we’ve been exposed to her weird examples of making small talk. The latest was telling Helen Mirren last night, “My husband called you granny.” Whoop-de-doo. I didn’t see that coming at all. What an insightful thing to say to a veteran actress like Dame Mirren!

      • LadySlippers says:

        But in the beginning no one mentioned her charity visits. Everything focused on her hair and clothing. Hillary Rodham Clinton said essentially the same thing — I work my tail off and no one notices. I change my hair and it’s front page news.

        Diana was very frustrated with people only commenting about her wardrobe & hair. And really, only the drama of her marriage trumped that. We now remember her for her work but that’s post sainthood not prior.

      • bluhare says:

        I’m continually boggled by how much you know about royals, Sachi. I’ve read a bit about Maxima and am liking her. The one who really had me laughing was Mathilde last week telling Hollande he ought to know about movie stars! The thought of something like that coming out of Kate’s mouth . . . . .

        One quibble. I think it was Helen who told Kate William called her granny and Kate giggled and said he’d asked her if she thought it appropriate.

        The Queen certainly didn’t look happy next to Kate, or at least I didn’t think so. Maybe I’m reading too much into it, but she looked pretty sour.

      • Sachi says:

        bluhare – I’m more interested in the European royals, so the info comes out whenever I can insert it into the conversation. 😀

        But yes, Letizia and Maxima are my favourites. I’m very impressed with their backgrounds and careers. Two different backgrounds but same drive and work ethic. Maxima is from a wealthy family while Letizia was solid middle-class. Both reached the peak of their careers before meeting their Princes, had independent lives, earned their own money, and are very much modern women. Both support LGBT and equal rights as well and have been quite vocal about it. There are lots to admire about both women. They’re also very good friends and spend lots of time with each other outside of royal events.

        Mathilde is another one I like. Opened up her own practice in speech therapy. Aristo background but she has settled well and improved Philippe’s image soooooooo much. He used to be seen as cold and aloof but Mathilde at his side has made him warm and more open.

        Mathilde, Maxima, and Letizia have all improved their husbands when it comes to their roles as future Kings. Shows what a true partnership and marriage would do.

        I misread that Helen Mirren part. Silly me. Sorry. 🙂

        But yes, the Queen looked sour last night. It’s rare when the Queen lets her emotions show and doesn’t bother hiding it. Maybe it was because her electric blue suit was matched by Kate’s bright red suit? Hahaha! The Queen didn’t stand out when that red was right beside her.

      • My2Pence says:

        HM might have been looking sour, not just because she was spending time with Kate Middleton, but because once again KM was walking ahead of HM. Look at the pictures on JJ and you’ll see it clearly. That and once again wearing “Look at Me” red. How difficult is it for Kate Middleton to remember that she is the junior woman in the pair? Protocol protocol protocol.

      • LadySlippers says:

        @Sachi: In your examples, you’ve also highlighted differences of the press in both Netherlands and Spain. The Dutch press would never treat their Royals like the Spanish or British press — so they have more substantive articles written about Maxima.

        I’m also going to touch on another hot button topic. I think, whether we agree or disagree, the focus on clothes belies a very, very sexist society. We in the US are certainly not immune and our coverage of a First Ladies (and Second Ladies) reeks of it. As does the focus on clothes for any and all the British and Spanish Royal Ladies. Letizia is certainly no dummy but you’d never know that with how and what the Spanish press writes about her.

        Maxima, in that regards, really lucked out when she fell in love with a Dutch Prince. Not every woman was as lucky. Masako is another unlucky Princess. Her resume/CV would put most of us to shame but the Japanese Imperial Household only wants vacuous dolls as Princesses. Luckily the Crown Prince is a gem.

      • My2Pence says:

        Meant to include the link. Kate Middleton clearly walking ahead of HM.

        http://www.justjared.com/photo-gallery/3055177/kate-middleton-recycles-alexander-mcqueen-dress-for-arts-reception-02/

        You just don’t DO that, or at least you aren’t SUPPOSED to do that. And yes, before anyone jumps on it, she is required to pay attention to “stuffy old protocol”.

        There is no way HM said, “Oh Kate, you go on ahead of me.” Three years married, 13 years total around this family, and KM still cannot “get” this basic thing? HM’s expression is probably the result of her struggling to stop her eyes rolling around in her head.

      • Sachi says:

        LadySlippers – You’re bang on point. Monarchies in general are very sexist. It’s a bygone institution that tries so hard to modernize itself but the remnants of the sexist ideologies are still there.

        The King of Sweden was said to have been very angry when the laws were changed to allow equal primogeniture. He wanted his son to inherit instead of his firstborn daughter. Well, look at them now. Victoria is doing a great job while her brother, the ‘wanted’ heir’, dates a former pornstar and famewhore.

        Maxima is very lucky that the Netherlands have had 3 Queens in the past 150 years, all who had shown the qualities of a good Queen. Maxima was welcomed into the fold by a warm future mother in-law in Beatrix. It also helped that Maxima mastered Dutch in less than 6 months. The Dutch press also have a deal with the Palace that they are not to photograph the royals unless the photos have been scheduled. There has been a good relationship with the press and the Dutch royal house for years.

        Spanish media, on the other hand, is highly sexist. The King himself lives in a macho world where his word is law. Letizia is the scapegoat because she’s the “outsider”, the cash cow for the media, and her journalistic background must have been a source of fear for the tabloids. Letizia has a lot of journalist friends whom she could have let loose in the past 10 years in order to defend herself. It’s kudos to her that she just takes the malice and keeps on working, holds her head up high, and continues to work for a royal family who has done nothing but throw her under the bus every chance they get.

        Masako just makes me sad and rage at the same time. She would have never fit into the fold and I think all her efforts to be her own person have failed. She was very much a modern woman in an incredibly old-fashioned family. Her SIL is the ideal Japanese wife: always smiling, always quiet, always walks behind her husband, and would do anything for the throne. Remember the young Prince? He was born 10 years after Kiko gave birth to her 2nd child. Talks of equal primogeniture and allowing Aiko to inherit on her own right started gaining ground at that time. Even the Japanese public was starting to support it. Then Kiko got pregnant…and lo and behold, it was a boy. What luck! The talks of equal succession rights got scrapped because the imperial throne has been “saved” with the birth of the Prince because God forbid a Princess takes the throne.

      • Suze says:

        I truly admire Maxima, too, Sachi. It’s almost unfair to compare Kate to her, because, frankly, Maxima is brilliant. She is highly educated and worked for many years in finance when she was single.She is married to Willem-Alexander, who obviously loves to be around intelligent, outgoing women, and is not in the least threatened by his dashing wife.

        Kate is not brilliant like Max, she doesn’t have her diverse life experience, she is not a polyglot, and she isn’t married into the Dutch royal family. The family Kate married into is far, far different.

        As far as comparisons go –

        I would say even the prisioner bride over in Monaco has made a better showing of late than our Kate. Charlene has been going about her business representing the royal house of Monaco and working steadily.

        Kate could best be compared to Princess Mary, in Denmark, I know there are varying opinions about Mary on the internet (LOL to say the least) but, at the very least, Mary keeps her hair under control during official appearances.

        Well, you posted before I did! I agree with your assessment on the other royal houses 100 percent!

      • bluhare says:

        Oh my, Twopence. I didn’t notice that. No wonder HM was not amused. You know who I feel sorry for? Prince Michael. If not for a few photos, you wouldn’t have known he was there.

        You guys know so much about the other royal families! I’m in awe.

      • hannah says:

        @sachi Helen Mirren mentioned the granny thing .

      • Sachi says:

        Suze – I agree with you about Charlene. There is much to say about her but she has always done her job since she became Princess of Monaco. She’s also very warm towards kids and she lights up at sports events.

        Thank you for bringing up Mary of Denmark. She and Kate do share similarities. I find both to be vapid…except Mary is so desperate for approval and fame that she’d do all the work if it meant getting to wear branded clothes and getting her photos taken by the media.

        That’s their main difference. Kate is the Stepford Wife who is satisfied with being controlled and babied, but Mary is the ambitious one who would maintain the illusion of a perfect marriage and the image of the perfect Princess because she “believes” that’s what royalty is all about, all the pomp and pretense with it.

        Mary works harder than her born-royal husband. She gets all the publicity in the family and that’s one of the things I find to be positive about her. She’ll go to the opening of a bag of crisps if there are cameras there. It’s her role to be seen and she performs it well.

      • Original N says:

        @My2Pence – well done & impressive observation skills…I completely missed that in the photographs.

      • CynicalCeleste says:

        @my2pence – .you must be right and I think this was an issue another time too, on the jubilee boat ride, she almost stepped ahead of Charles and Camilla… and William pulled her back? There was a video on that I remember seeing at the time…

      • My2Pence says:

        I think you’re right, she did do that on the Jubilee boat trip too. Was that before or after she ran into someone (William maybe) with her umbrella? Kate Middleton also walked ahead of HM and Prince Philip during a joint engagement. That was the time KM wore the green suit with the awful peplum and nearly flashed HM getting out of the car.

      • Casey says:

        Sachi, I’d never heard anything bad about Princess Mary before! Probably because I’m Australian and over here she’s revered, despite the only notable thing about her being that she married well.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        Casey,
        I’m Danish and I haven’t any bad press about CP Mary either – I do know that she is abhorred at Royal Dish which I find confusing and unplesant since some of the posters can be quite malicious. I don’t know what she’s like as a person other than what I’ve heard from a friend who has worked on some of the royal palaces. He told me she is pleasant, forthright and had some very definite ideas about the restauration and decoration of the palace she and her family lives in – and that her children are well-behaved and seem happy.

  11. kellyinseattle says:

    She does still seem like a teenager to me, despite her luxurious upbringing and finishing schools, and she really does need to change her look every once in awhile…Jen Aniston syndrome…hope she doesnt catch it…..staying with the same, boring look til Kingdom Come.

  12. Wren says:

    For all you ladies with thick, hair-pin and hair-clip eating hair: extra long bobby pins. They are magic. I never understood how those sad little pieces of metal that are regular bobby pins ever held up anyone’s hair, but then I discovered the extra-long kind. Kate could try some.

    I’ve never been able to stand having my hair hanging in my face, so I can’t even fathom NOT putting my hair up if I’m going to be somewhere even slightly breezy. Hair getting in my mouth or sticking to my eyelashes? Ugh, no thanks! There’s plenty of cute updos, and if I can put my hair up nicely I’m sure someone with an army of top hairdressers on call can handle it too.

    • vava says:

      I can’t stand my hair in my face, either. I also hate seeing people running their fingers through there hair like Duchess does. It’s not just once or twice, it’s constant! She often times pulls her hair back in private (see photos walking the dog and baby, shopping, etc.) but not regularly for public appearances. This certainly suggests that she is hiding behind her hair. Grow up Duchess! Sheesh!

      Good tip on the extra long bobby pins. Thanks!

      • Hazel says:

        I once had the misfortune to sit behind a ‘hair-flipper’ in class. All throughout the 50-minute lecture she was flipping her hair–first to the right, then to the left, over & over again. And it was hitting my desk! Bleh! I had to move. And the worst part was, she had the first seat in the middle row so that no matter where I sat, I caught sight of her hair-flipping!

    • FLORC says:

      I’m the same way. Hair getting caught in eyelashes and touching my face is annoying to say the least. Especially with my oily skin.
      I love those spiral bobbypins. 3 long ones holds all of my hair up on a bun without scraping my scalp or falling out.

      I’m still betting Kate has trichotillomania. She never stops touching it and her hair was very thin in the dating years. I mean, we’re not still pretending that’s her natural hair, right?

      • vava says:

        maybe the extensions irritate her scalp? I’m with you, that isn’t all her natural hair – no way!

        The constant touching of the hair seems like a nervous tick.

      • FLORC says:

        She’s been caught tapping her scalp such as women with extentions do. It would irritate me too. And I meant trichotillomania as a nervous tick. It is for me.

      • LadySlippers says:

        @Florc: True mental health issues aren’t just ‘tics’ though. If she had trichotillomania (I mean a diagnosable issue) we’d be able to see her hair loss. Hair twirling and such should not be confused with a real mental health issue.

        Sorry Florc, I hope you forgive me but it really bugs me when people use arm chair psychoanalysis and not know psychology very well. It’s not just you it’s a good portion of society. Again sorry if I took it out on you.

      • Tara says:

        FLORC
        Kate clutches at her hair so much because she is terrified it will blow up and expose the wefts of the weave sections.

      • FLORC says:

        LadySlippers
        My degree here is always armchair. Even when it drifts into my actual degree and expertise.
        My point is we don’t see her bald patches because she has extentions.
        My strictly arm chair psychoanalysis is I see she has much of the same “ticks” I do. I use that word for triggers or stressors.
        And on a personal note you can’t see where my hair is affected. It only looks like breakage and new growth which we all have. To be able to see it would be an extreme. Not seeing it does not mean it’s not there.

        And I don’t dispute that condition is a mental health issue. It’s OCD and I think by way of observation she might have it. It’s my one area I feel empathy for her. But again… Arm chair. Sorry If my opinion or way of phrasing offends you LadySlippers. It’s not my intent.

      • LadySlippers says:

        My point with trichitillomania is there are huge and noticable bald patches that are visible with this diagnosis. In one of my psych classes we got to see how severe the hair pulling needs to be to be diagnosable. Like wow! But people often do milder versions of almost any diagnosis and that still fall within the acceptable realm of ‘normal’. Does that make sense? (Sometimes I hate how we can’t clarify something easily on the internet. It’d be so much quicker in person)

        I don’t dispute she might have some nervous tics and/or she touches her hair to prevent us ‘peeking’ at her extensions (which is rather ironic if you think about it. She doesn’t want us to see possible hair extensions but appears to have no qualms about us seeing her underwear. Go figure). In fact, we all have nervous tics, some of us more than others. I just don’t like throwing around a mental health diagnosis without all the facts and/or based on a few incidental behaviours.

    • bluhare says:

      I LOVE extra long bobby pins, I can pull my hair in a twist and fasten it securely with one.

  13. Barrett says:

    Maybe it’s her “man” prince William who likes her super long hair. I was wearing a ponytail when my husband met me so he always says that is what he likes best. I’m like I can’t be 70 with a ponytail!

    • Jaded says:

      Barrett – I’ve always thought that, that William demands that she look like that and we all know she’s a total doormat when it comes to Prince Grumpypants.

    • bluhare says:

      Barrett, yes, you can. 🙂

    • Lucky Charm says:

      The great benefit of having long hair is the huge variety of hairstyles you can wear. She can certainly keep her long hair, but wear it up or back for official engagements. Braids, buns, ponytails, clips/barrettes, etc. can all be easily managed to keep the hair out of her face, and show off the beautiful jewels or neckline of her dress. It’s simply laziness on her part. And being lazy is certainly not an attribute that anyone wants to see in their official representative.

  14. Mary says:

    So after 10 years of preparing for this role…she is still completely unprepared. It appears that she has been so completely sheltered from any kind of reality that she struggles now with things that should be basic common sense. She needs to start working more behind the scenes where the press can’t watch her and learn proper human interaction.

    • LilyT says:

      I wonder though if it’s really that she’s not prepared. A lot of these “issues” could be easily resolved. It wonder if any of this is some sort of passive-aggression.. A way of acting out?

  15. MissNostalgia says:

    She needs to cut her hair to a length that it can still be pinned up, but is styled to suit her age. She does have lovely hair, but it now has a personality of its own and frankly overwhelms her. She also need to soften her makeup and her eyeliner has to go. Also, I am sick and tired of seeing her in skin tight jeans/leggings/jeggings…..if she must wear jeans, then she can afford a more comfortable, fitting style with flatter heels. She has some nice things in her wardrobe, but the comments in the article about the short, flowing skirts and the constant need for her to hold them down in public, is spot on. Someone needs to take her in hand, because she will never make the changes on her own, and it will only get more ridiculous as she gets older…then it will not be cute.

    • vava says:

      LOL at the hair “having a personality of it’s own”. So funny! So TRUE!

      I think they should forbid her to do official appearances until she gets her act together. That means no travel overseas, too, until she is presentable!

  16. Nymeria says:

    This is what happens when stupidity and mollycoddling are combined.

    This woman is a joke.

  17. MonicaQ says:

    This girl could change overnight and people would still not like her. I’m indifferent to the royals but dang, the disgust people have for her is insane. I expect no rich person/royal to do charity work–it’d be *nice* but I don’t expect people to be nice. I’m honest to god surprised when they do. Expect the worse so you’re never disappointed, ect.

    Maybe William likes her hair like that? Anyone ever maybe thought of that one? I doubt he’d divorce her over something as stupid as hair but maybe she keeps it long for him.

    • bluhare says:

      I used to be a champion of “expect the worst; you won’t be disappointed”, but I found it too depressing. Yes, it’s no fun to be disappointed, but it’s also no fun to never get excited about things.

    • Original N says:

      Three quick points:
      1. When one’s lifestyle is funded by the British taxpayer, it seems to be common sense that one might want to show said taxpayers that one is actually working FOR them … if not, one may find that the taxpayers are not so inclined to continue to fund such a lifestyle! In this way, royalty cannot be considered interchangeable with the average “rich” person.
      2. I, personally, do not want to live in a society where mediocrity exceeds my expectations.
      3. Re: “Maybe William likes her hair like that? Anyone ever maybe thought of that one?” – I refer you to comment number 13 by Barrett.

    • Suze says:

      Personally I think both William and Kate should up their game. It’s not really disgust on my part, more like exasperation. The two of them started with such an excess of goodwill from the public back in 2011 and they managed to let that PR dream just slip away. All it would take from both of them is to make a few small adjustments to their public lives and they could pretty easily regenerate that goodwill.

      Royals are expected to have patronages and make appearances. WillKate are not some random rich people who have the option of doing charity work or eschewing it.

      There have been several people commenting that William may like her hair long. Since he’s not with her at the majority of these appearances, it wouldn’t kill her to pull it back so she can make it one less thing the press and the commenters on the internet can talk about. It’s a very sall thing that would make a huge difference in her public persona.

      I alternate from this exasperation to feeling sorry for her for marrying Wills in the first place, because I get the feeling she is somewhat trapped by his expectations. However, she really, really wanted to marry him so I want to see her hunker down and make good on the long game.

      • bluhare says:

        Agree, Suze. Love your “trapped by his expectations” comment . . . except do you think it’s his expectations? I’m thinking it might be others’ expectations.

    • KateBush says:

      She is still finding her way, Diana was very awkward and made some questionable fashion choices too in her early years of marriage.

      I’m Giving Kate a chance as I think she’ll improve.

      • Original N says:

        Perhaps that is true but anyone else that took 3 years to find his/her way in his/her job would have been sacked by now…

      • kay says:

        Albeit Diana struggled at first in her new role but this was mainly due to shyness and lack of direction. What she had from day one -in spades- and what Kate lacks is charisma and genuine empathy for people. No amount of “finding her way” time will help Kate improve in these areas – you either have it or you don’t. Sorry.

      • Lucky Charm says:

        Diana was 20 years old when she got married! Everyone at 20 is still finding their way fashion wise. Kate is 32 and has been married for three years, and exposed to the royal family in essence since she was 20. She certainly should be making appropriate fashion choices by now.

    • HH says:

      “This girl could change overnight and people would still not like her.”
      – While this is true for some people, for the most part people were rooting for her. If you look at the commentary from her beginning time as a royal people were very supportive of her and patient. Those comments have slowly turned into disappointment and frustration. I wouldn’t confuse these two sentiments with hate.

      “I expect no rich person/royal to do charity work–it’d be *nice* but I don’t expect people to be nice. I’m honest to god surprised when they do. Expect the worse so you’re never disappointed, ect.”
      – I’m sure Marie-Antoinette would have loved you. I just flat-out disagree with everything here. I’m of the mindset “to whom much is given, much is expected.” And in terms of royalty, we must highlight the word GIVEN. If Bill Gates wants to make it rain on a few strippers then have it Billy. Royalty does and SHOULD have different standards.

      “Maybe William likes her hair like that? Anyone ever maybe thought of that one? I doubt he’d divorce her over something as stupid as hair but maybe she keeps it long for him.”
      -That’s fine. But I’m sure her wearing it back for an engagement (especially once in which he’s not present) shouldn’t be hard. I don’t mind Kate wearing it long, but it’s not well-styled. While there are complaints about her hair length, I think these feelings are heightened because of two reasons: 1) There’s no variety in her styling, particularly when there needs to be in order to suit the type of engagement; and, 2) SHE CAN’T STOP TOUCHING IT.

      • Original N says:

        @HH – YES, YES, YES to ‘I’m of the mindset “to whom much is given, much is expected.” ‘

      • LadySlippers says:

        And Marie-Antoinette did have some charities and this was even before Royals having charities was a thing. She often gets thrown under the bus when she doesn’t deserve it.

      • HH says:

        @LadySlippers – Guility as charged. Thanks for the info! 🙂

      • MonicaQ says:

        Don’t get me wrong, I *like* when the rich give to charity. I think they *should*. I do not expect them to. Maybe being on food stamps and going to a school where I saw the richest kids getting Audis and bitching about how they weren’t BMWs skewed my vision of rich people but I expect them to ignore those beneath them and give when it is only beneficial to them.

        And yes, there are those that have proven me wrong. I’m glad for the world for them.

      • My2Pence says:

        MoniaQ. Again back to your original point, these royals aren’t “rich” on their own. Every penny of their existence tracks back to the taxpayers, including their multiple luxury homes, Kate Middleton’s clothing and jewelry allowance, and William’s inheritance. They are expected to work to earn their keep, or to give back the taxpayer-funded 1% life.

        I agree, wealthy people who earn their own wealth and then give to charity are the ideal.

      • HH says:

        @MonicaQ – Understandable. As far expecting them to “give when it is only beneficial to them,” I think that’s also a frustration voiced about royalty (especially about Will and Kate). It seems both of them tend to come out for the glitzy events all smiles, but do the other events with less enthusiasm. IMO, it would be the nail in the coffin for royalty to have the attitude of the rich kids you dealt with at school (at least publicly). People tend to see Royalty as an antiquated institution and in times of recession anti-royal sentiments heighten. If the BRF wishes to continue being the BRF, then they can’t afford to *act* like selfish, rich simpletons.

      • CynicalCeleste says:

        +1 HH

      • Sixer says:

        MonicaQ – as others have said, the British Royal Family is a cost to the UK tax payers. So yes, we DO get to criticise what they do for charity and whether their contributions of time and energy are sufficient compared to the cost to our national budget.

        Including security and revenues from the duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster (these aren’t included in the Sovereign Grant which is all they like to tell us about), the monarchy costs us about £0.2 billion a year. That’s a lot of money. More than 100 times, for example, what it costs to maintain the Irish presidency. More than double what it costs to maintain the Dutch monarchy.

        It’s not the same as criticising a privately rich person AT ALL.

    • Suze says:

      And she’s not a girl.

      She is a 32 year old, royal, wife and mother. She is definitely in woman territory.

    • hannah says:

      or more likely , she likes her hair that way .

  18. AMBER5ASH says:

    Her hair is the only pretty thing she has on her. She probably knows that and keeps it long and down. She’s just plain boring.

  19. ItSetsYou says:

    He flying skirts don’t bother me. If it was me wearing those dresses, I would be uncomfortable knowing that my underwear would be showing, so I would choose carefully. I would also hate my hair to constantly get in my face. I pull mine back most of the time. But maybe she is ok with all that.

  20. Hopeful says:

    I remember reading that Diana’s designers put weights in her skirts to prevent them flying up and indeed she never had this problem. I wonder too at its being allowed to continue with the Duchess. The queen has a long fuse!

    Diana was so perfect in her role; Kate is not coming across as a future Princess of Wales and Queen Consort. She seems to have no instinctive feel for the job, sadly.

  21. Bored suburbanhousewife says:

    Kate seems entirely impervious to criticism and entirely unconcerned about how how she is perceived. Nothing that has been said for the last three years seems to have caused her even go experiment with a course correction., whether is be her hair, her flying skirts, her total disinterest in getting out there with real people and trying to make a difference, like Diana and many other royals.

    Btw I enjoyed the weekend postings about Jecca-gate–whether the leaks/tweets came directly or indirectly from Middleton camp nothing so far dissuades me from believing that Kate is very threatened by Jecca and wants to keep her far far away from William by hook or crook.
    I also feel somewhat sorry for Kate, recently William hasn’t even bothered to pretend he gives a shit about her or George.what a disappointment he has turned out.

    • ItSetsYou says:

      @Bored suburbanhousewife

      Why is that? How does he ‘not give a shit’ about them? I don’t see any signs of that his attitude.

      • Bored suburbanhousewife says:

        They rarely seem to be in the same town, let alone shared digs. When they are together, he usually either ignores her or seems occasionally irritated by her. The weekend with Jecca, missing the Mustique trip, and the ten week Cambridge course, and fewer shared appearances (which already they don’t do a lot anyway) are noticeable. I am absolutely convinced he knows Kate does not like Jecca to spend time with him, and Kate already has been spending time at her parents while he is elsewhere half the time since even before George. They seem to be out and about together even less than Charles and Diana did at this stage and those two were not, as we know, very happily married.

  22. LilyT says:

    The person who wrote that piece should probably pull out the large stick that is clearly lodged in their rear.

  23. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    Her hair, heavy make-up, and eating disorder are the only things she has going for her. Take away the hair, and you have a woman with heavy make-up and an eating disorder (i.e., a sure-fire way to look years older than she really is). The hair is probably her way of trying to look younger.

  24. rep says:

    I was wondering if my eyes were deceiving me when I saw Kate walking in front of the Queen. Her husband doesn’t do that. I mean come on, I learned that in preschool.

  25. rep says:

    One more thing, Kate’s smile looks manic because she is faking. Its the smile of someone Who is bored and trying not to look like it. I feel for her there, because what can you do if you dont want to be in the room? So all this time with william and she really just wanted one aspect of being his wife, that would be priveleges. I really thought she was ready on her wedding day, but i guess not.

    • Angelique says:

      I agree. It seems that she has no interest in charity or even improving the lives of her countrymen. I mean good heavens she does know she’s British doesn’t she?

      It was a bit naive of her (and Will too) to think that she could just lounge about on a priceless settee, eating bon-bons and leafing through fashion magazines. I’m not sure why William didn’t prepare her more thoroughly, maybe tag along with Princess Anne one day to see what the job really entailed. Maybe Will thought that he could lounge about eating bon-bons alongside Kate. But ever since that visit to Balmoral, Will has stepped up to the plate and actually started acting his age and his position in life.

      Yay Will! I actually think he might be able to succeed as a royal in the modern world, which is increasingly inclined to think that there really is no use for royalty anymore. But he has to keep Waity in line, take away her blow dryer, hide her eye liner, break the heels of her stilettos,,,remind her that she will never mean much in life if she doesn’t learn the meaning of SERVICE.

  26. Bridget says:

    I’m just going to say it: I feel bad for Kate. She very clearly just doesn’t have a clue. I don’t know if its because she’s dim, or if she’s just surrounded by sharks instead of people, but she is just floundering. Yes, she wanted this role, badly. Yes, she is doing it badly. Its just so public. Even the well deserved criticism has got to sting, when it’s delivered on such a public stage. I remember reading that Laura Bush was so hurt by the poor reception one of her first endeavors as First Lady received that she never really put herself out there again (and indeed, Laura Bush didn’t have nearly the high profile role as other First Ladies).

  27. HoustonGrl says:

    Nothing is worse than those spray on jeggings. Downright vulgar. But everything else she gets a pass (just barely).

  28. Montréalise says:

    I read the Maclean’s article online and the comments are unanimously critical of the writer and supportive of Kate. Several people wrote that anyone who disparages Kate’s clothes or her behaviour is – wait – JEALOUS of the Duchess! The standard response these days to any critical comment, anywhere.

  29. sue says:

    a woman who hang on to a prince for a decade got married after three years still doing nothing is ridiculous, i honesttly believe william and she were just having a goodtime and never thought of her as princess material until carole forced him, chelsy walked away, why couldnt wwaity just go, if she knew she cant handle royal life

  30. sophietta says:

    I’m a Brit living in the US who has just discovered this site….well “just” being last week! Always interesting to hear the ‘take’ from this side of the pond. Was in the UK earlier this month and spoke with friends who were not impressed with Kate Middleton’s lack of effort at being a duchess and member of the Firm. Then there is mum! Carole Middleton has always struck me as a keen observer of the appropriate! Her taste is really quite spot on and she appears to be a mother who has steered her children in what she perhaps considers enviable directions. So – why is she not attempting to guide her daughter to a more favourable spot in the eyes of the British public. Hair, posture, clothing, speech……quite a list. And to side step a moment: why so few pictures of a future king? One gets the feeling that now that the deed has been accomplished (the marriage), one can just sit back and bask……