Us Weekly: King Charles will have a ‘bittersweet’ Christmas without the Sussexes

Above, you can see a photo from Wednesday’s state-visit greeting at Windsor Castle. King Charles and Queen Camilla stood on a tented podium alongside Germany’s president and first lady. Off to the side, literally “outside the tent,” the Prince and Princess of Wales glumly stood to watch the military parade or procession or whatever it’s called. Charles’s insistence on excluding his heir and the heir’s wife from these kinds of photocalls is hilariously petty. Charles did the same during the Trump state visit too, he shoved William and Kate off to the side, and Camilla literally shooed Kate away when she tried to talk to Melania. These are the grand royal humiliation rituals the Sussexes are missing, remember?? “This could be you, Harry and Meghan!”

I bring up this petty AF staging because Us Weekly’s cover story this week is all about royal Christmas at Sandringham. The mood this year will be decidedly sad-sack and they have no one but themselves to blame. Some highlights from Us Weekly:

Christmas at Sandringham: According to a source, the mood this holiday season is bittersweet. While Charles has appeared well in recent months, the king, 77, is still undergoing treatment for his cancer diagnosis; at the same time, it’s Kate’s first Christmas since announcing she’s in remission from cancer in January. “The celebration may carry a wistful tone,” says the source, “however, it will also be a time of celebration, especially after Kate received the all-clear.” The theme of Kate’s Together at Christmas carol service at Westminster Abbey — which airs in the U.K. on December 24 — is happiness and love, and the source says that sentiment will carry over to the royal holiday. “They all want to make the most of their time together.”

Will & Kate will be in Norfolk for Christmas: They typically alternate between spending Christmas with William’s side of the family and with Kate’s parents, Michael and Carole Middleton, but are happy to be at Charles’ side. (A second source says the Middletons will join Kate and William at Sandringham.)

The Wales kids love Christmas: “They love Christmas,” says the source, noting that William and Kate strive to keep their children as down-to-earth as possible. “They want to create a traditional Christmas without airs and graces, unlike what Charles might have had as a child.”

Charles & Harry’s relationship: The [September] father-son sit-down was promising, but the source says “that’s as far as it has gone,” and Harry and William remain as estranged as ever. The second source tells Us there are new concerns over “whether or not trust can be rebuilt” after Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, 44, attended Kris Jenner’s celebrity- packed 70th birthday party on November 8. “If they are going to go out and look like Hollywood players, it’s at odds with what the palace and royal family members would do,” says the source, adding that the likelihood of the Sussexes getting a Christmas invite from Charles was always “slim.”

Charles is determined to have a memorable holiday. “Charles prioritizes duty, but he’s also a family man who knows his time is precious,” says the first source. “He wants a special last Christmas in case it’s his last.” He plans on taking part in the annual walk to St. Mary Magdalene Church on Christmas morning and recording his Christmas speech, which airs later that afternoon. (Last year, 5 million viewers tuned in.) “Nothing would stop Charles from doing that,” says the source, noting that the monarch ascribes to his late mother’s credo that one “has to be seen to be believed.” Adds the source: “He will do everything expected of him and more.” The second source says those around Charles are cautiously optimistic about what he’s up for: “His health isn’t the best. They’re taking it day by day….Charles wants to have a traditional holiday with all the royals. Every family Christmas is precious, but it’s especially so for him this year.”

[From Us Weekly]

I’m chuckling at “now we can’t trust the Sussexes because they partied with Kris Jenner” – they’re running out of reasons to be mad at Harry and Meghan, my god. We’re mad about Netflix! About Spare! About Meghan’s entertaining show! About Meghan using her title! About Kris Jenner’s birthday party! About Colbert! It’s also funny, but mostly really sad and pitiful, that the point of this piece is that Charles isn’t doing well and he wants to be surrounded by family this Christmas, but he still won’t invite his actual son, daughter-in-law and redheaded grandkids to spend the holiday in the UK. Meanwhile, William has practically announced that he only plans to do the Christmas morning church walk and nothing else. It’s like the king and his heir are BOTH Scrooge.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images. Cover courtesy of Us Weekly.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

38 Responses to “Us Weekly: King Charles will have a ‘bittersweet’ Christmas without the Sussexes”

  1. Oh dear. The poor Chuckles crap has started. Here’s the thing. Harry, even though his father is a shitty father and grandfather and evicted him from Frogmore, is the only one who actually wants some sort of relationship with his father. Peg is a schmuck and has his father in the grave. Harry understands the word love but his dear old dad doesn’t and so this is where Chuckles is with his two sons. He will die without his sons because he just doesn’t get it!!

    • Beth says:

      So Hollywood and it’s ‘players’ are good enough for the Pope, but not the royal family? Can these ludicrous sycophants hear themselves? They’re not doing the monarchy any favours at all, ironically 😅🤣😂

      • Sunniside up says:

        You read the headline and the answer to Charles’s problem is simple, If he wants to see them, invite them and make sure that they get the security they need, the answer lies in his hands.

    • Kathleen says:

      I am pretry sure that Meghan prefers to spend Christmas with her mother and has no intention of going to Sandringham. The royals are saving face by pretending to snub someone who was not coming anyway.

  2. jais says:

    They’re both Scrooge and Kate is Scroogette with her talk about having a sentimental-free Christmas, lol. Anyways, as far as the tent goes, did the Queen not make Charles and Camilla stand outside the tent for these type of visits? Is this really something Charles created and implemented just for the Wales?

    • Julia says:

      There are pictures of Charles and Camilla in the tent with Phillip and Elizabeth from previous state visits so yes this is something Charles has implemented.

      • jais says:

        ohhh dang. Yeah, Charles is that petty. Hey, at least the Wales just got evicted from a tent and not a whole house.

      • Becks1 says:

        That’s hilarious.

      • QuiteContrary says:

        And it’s not as if the tent is crowded. There was plenty of space in that tent LOL.

      • Christine says:

        I can’t help it, this pic has completely cracked me up. It’s so hilariously petty. They didn’t even bother to center the tent’s occupants, so there is a nice Will and Kate sized hole. What a ridiculously horrible family this is, I can’t believe anyone really wants to keep this mascot farce going

    • Harla says:

      I did see photos of WandK in a tent with the rest of the party, perhaps it was a different tent, or maybe after a certain thing happens, they can join the rest of the group.

  3. Miranda says:

    Well, a wiser, more introspective man would examine his past words and deeds, realize that he behaved horribly, sincerely apologize to his son for a lifetime of trauma and to his daughter-in-law for his racist remarks and for allowing the press to savage her, sort out the security nonsense, and ask them to come see him for what might be his last few months on Earth. It really is THAT simple, and Charles really is THAT petty and self-absorbed that he’ll never do it.

    Also, why is the Christmas Church Walk a thing? Do people really give a shit and actually line up to see it? Because that’s weird. Standing in the cold to watch some people walk into a building is weird.

    • Lurker says:

      The old royalists do give a shit. They happily stand in the cold, and even have gifts for the Wails children. Derangers think that George will hug THEIR teddybear at night. And Louis and Charlotte will think fondly of them as they are munching the sweets they gave them (I bet they land in the bin right away). The delusion is tragic, but apparently it makes these old biddies happy. They will rave at church bingo about how George took their present with so much charm, such a handsome young gentleman, and don’t you know he remembered me from last year/the Easter walk! And doesn’t look Charlotte just like the Queen, and she shared MY flowers with her cousin! Doesn’t she have a heart of gold! They truly live for moments like this and will protect “their” royal family at all costs, they can’t do wrong and each taxpayer penny is well worth it. Heck, they would happily pay twice as much, while complaining that they can only heat one room in their drafty council apartment.

  4. Kittenmom says:

    The wales kids are as down to earth as possible with no airs and graces? LOL spare me. It’s so down to earth to change mansions because the old one had “bad memories.” No airs and graces to not let the plebes within a mile of your 150 acre grifted estate.

    • Becks1 says:

      George allegedly sent staff from the yacht to bring him McDonald’s. They watch major sporting events from box seats. they took a selfie with Taylor Swift (and almost delayed her concert.) They’ve gone on at least two posh skiing vacations, Mustique, and the yacht vacation this year alone – and that’s what we know of.

      Those kids are anything but down to earth and opening presents on christmas morning instead of christmas eve before the black tie dinner isn’t going to change that.

  5. Eurydice says:

    I guess it’s ok to hang with Hollywood players as long as you’re Charles and William. As for Christmas without the Sussexes, Charles should be used to it by now.

  6. B says:

    My God these people are petty, toxic and dysfunctional and they let it all play in PUBLIC! I can’t believe these people and their pet press ever had the nerve to say Meghan was the problem when this is how they behave in plain sight.

  7. Mel says:

    They do this every year and there’s always some dumb reason why with their sad, aching broken hearts that Harry and Meghan won’t be invited. Mind you, I don’t think they’d go even if they were invited because days with these folks sounds like a miserable. Let’s stop repeating their idiocy .

    • Sunniside up says:

      I can’t see H and M sitting down to Christmas dinner while their children eat their Christmas with the servants in another room.

  8. Tessa says:

    Keens festive glances with tilted head are not returned by scooter. Charles could have seen the sussexes over these last few years and it’s all on him.

  9. Lady Digby says:

    Was William making fists with his hands to restrain himself from thwacking his father in public for the “tent exclusion?” When he’s Kingy with George being too young to appear alongside daddy, who will he exclude from the tent at future state visits? Surely he can’t exclude Kate ? No festive glances if she’s outside the tent?

  10. Lady Digby says:

    A family friend has terminal cancer and is making the best of her last Christmas. She has been inundated with family invitations because she has been a loving mum, gran, step gran and great gran.She’s much loved and respected round the village because she has a generous nature and has time for everyone. Her title which she’s earnt through a good life , well lived is, Beloved and she leaves a legacy of love, respect and trust. What legacy is Charles leaving behind for his wife, sons , stepchildren, grand children and step grandchildren?

  11. QuiteContrary says:

    There’s nothing as down-to-earth as strangers showering you with free toys and treats as you walk to church on Christmas morning! No airs! No graces!

  12. Blubb says:

    If I read that right, the Waleses are leaving as soon as they could and nowhere it’s said the king wants to spent extra time with this grandchildren. And if the Waleses are leaving for a less formal dinner with children and the other grandparents, I even could understand them. And doesn’t Camilla leave too as soon as she can to spent time with her family? Or are they invited to Sandringham? Who is spending time with Charles at Christmas?

  13. cosmo says:

    Charles doesn’t like redheads/gingers, remember?

  14. Hello says:

    King Charles Reportedly Preparing for This Christmas to Be His Last!

    https://uk.news.yahoo.com/king-charles-reportedly-preparing-christmas-141300083.html

    • Blubb says:

      Well as his wife is a friend of the mails Caroline Graham she can give him Thomas Markle number and they can share their worries together and with the fail.

  15. Gabby says:

    Ah yes, the classic “after all, it may be ____’s last Christmas”. What family hasn’t had to deal with that?
    I had a nightmare of a grandmother (imagine a meaner and more manipulative version of Livia Soprano) who stretched that out for 3 “probably-my-last” Christmases.

    WanK should just be consistent and skip the whole church walk charade as well.

  16. Amy Bee says:

    If Charles was a better father, his family would be around him for Christmas. Plus I get the sense Harry and Meghan have their own way of celebrating Christmas that they enjoy.

  17. Saucy&Sassy says:

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but the last time H&M had Christmas with the brf was 2018. I find it difficult to believe that anyone is missing them. They just want Harry back in the fold to be their scapegoat.

  18. Jferber says:

    Christine, I’m with you. The tent picture is absolutely hilarious. An SNL sketch could be Will and Kate rebelling and running helter-skelter into the tent, like storming the Bastille. How would Charles and Camilla react? Why would William accept this humiliation for him and his wife? Again, I find this very funny and yet exactly what Will and Kate deserve.

  19. Maja says:

    Christmas is celebrated with loved ones, with people who are close to you, who share your joys and sorrows. Where was that ever the case in this London “family”? In patriarchal, authoritarian, status-obsessed and strictly hierarchical systems like this, there will never be love, closeness, care, appreciation and mindfulness. There will only ever be competition, envy and jealousy, fed from the top down, so that no one gets the idea of freedom. Harry has broken through this suffocating cocoon and rediscovered his full humanity. That would never have been possible in this system. That’s why they’re so angry with him. Because he shows them what a loved and loving person can be. Developed and complete.

  20. fwiw says:

    When I saw the picture, I thought they were staging a Christmas scene. The tent looks like a stable, especially with a horse in it. There’s no manger but there is a baby who can’t even put toothpaste on his own toothbrush. Then looking in from outside the stable must be the ox and the ass. No way are they the wise men.

  21. Maja says:

    https://bylinetimes.com/2025/11/19/dinner-with-mr-brexit-bannons-european-revolution-planned-with-farage-backed-by-epstein/z
    This is important to know when considering Christmas, Sandringham, Epstein, Andrew, and right-wing extremists. These individuals attempt to conceal all of this with their malicious articles about Harry and Meghan. The scandal, of course, involves not only Andrew, but everyone who profited from Epstein.
    These people constantly try to pull the wool over the world’s eyes with their flood of meaningless articles on pointless topics.

  22. bisynaptic says:

    Charles, a “family man”! LOL

  23. Advisor2U says:

    It is so obvious that this entire piece is a tabloid construct. It might even be AI-generated, cause all the “facts” are known already/published, or brought up in other royal gossip commentary/pieces. No sources were consulted. Next.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment