Paul Dano is getting so much industry love after Quentin Tarantino slammed him

Earlier this week, we talked about Quentin Tarantino’s bizarrely personal attack on Paul Dano. Tarantino was being interviewed by Bret Easton Ellis on Ellis’s podcast, and Tarantino was discussing his top-twenty films of the 21st century. His list was garbage, btw. But he put Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood in his top-ten, and argued that the film would have been his #1 except for Paul Dano. Dano gave a gonzo performance in that film, trying his best to go toe-to-toe with Daniel Day Lewis. Lesser actors would have failed miserably, but Dano held his own and he played off DDL in interesting ways. Here are Tarantino’s full comments, as transcribed by People Mag:

Tarantino, 62, described Dano, 41, as “weak sauce” during his Tuesday, Dec. 2 appearance on an episode of The Bret Easton Ellis Podcast as he and host Bret Easton Ellis talked through Tarantino’s opinions on the top movies of the 21st century. As Tarantino named There Will Be Blood, the 2007 epic that Dano costarred in with Daniel Day-Lewis, his fifth-favorite movie of the last 25 years, he said the movie “would stand a better chance to be in number one or number two if it didn’t have a big giant flaw in it.”

“And the flaw is Paul Dano,” Tarantino said. “Obviously, it’s supposed to be a two-hander, and it’s also so drastically obvious that it’s not a two-hander. . . He is weak sauce, man. He’s a weak sister. . . Austin Butler would have been wonderful in that role.”

When host Ellis asked Tarantino whether he thought Dano was simply the wrong actor for the part, the famed director said, “He’s just such a weak, weak, uninteresting guy. . . Daniel Day-Lewis shows that he doesn’t need [a strong foil in the movie]. He doesn’t need anything. The movie would’ve had more — there would’ve been more stringiness to the beef. And again, it’s supposed to be a two-hander, and it’s not.”

When Ellis contended that Day-Lewis’ performance in the movie is “so gargantuan” that it perhaps overshadows Dano’s, Tarantino responded, “So you put him with the weakest male actor in SAG? The limpest d–k in the world?”

“I’m not saying he’s giving a terrible performance,” he added moments later. “I’m saying he’s giving a non-entity [performance]. I don’t care for him. I don’t care for Owen Wilson, I don’t care for Matthew Lillard.”

[From People]

Throughout the week, people have engaged in some really interesting armchair psychoanalysis of why the hell Tarantino is attacking Dano in this personal way. I think the most reasonable explanation is that Dano is a brilliant character actor who tends to be really good at playing losers, fanatics and villains, and Tarantino feels like Dano’s acting roles hit too close to (Tarantino’s) home. As in, Tarantino hates Dano because he sees himself in Dano.

In any case, something sort of cool has happened in the wake of Tarantino’s interview. Industry people, across the board, and showing love to Dano, who generally seems to be one of the least problematic people in the industry. Actors, directors, writers and producers are all posting messages of support to Paul Dano or highlighting his work. I might watch The Fabelmans again, just to support him! He’s GREAT in The Fabelmans. Toni Collette posted something from Little Miss Sunshine. Matt Reeves (who did The Batman with Dano) tweeted his support. And on and on. They’re calling this a reverse cancellation! It reminds me a little bit of what happened with Jeremy Strong after his bitchy New Yorker profile, and all of Strong’s industry friends were like “Jeremy is awesome, actually.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Paul Dano is getting so much industry love after Quentin Tarantino slammed him”

  1. BlueSky says:

    There is also a theory of Tarantino is a failed actor who wishes he had the type of career Dano has. Tarantino is a terrible actor and only way he can get on screen is when he casted himself. He’s usually the weakest most forgettable part of the movie.

    • Happy Peregrine says:

      Paul Dano was 23 when he co starred with DDL – a man everyone in the industry seems to be deeply intimidated by and have a disturbing reverence for.

      He wasn’t out acted. He delivered an amazing and unique performance.

      QT is ugly jealous and it’s so gross and cruel.

  2. k says:

    1. wrong.
    2. rude.

  3. Aimee says:

    Tarantino can be such a crusty bitch.

  4. Dee(2) says:

    Whatever his reasoning was for attacking all the actors that he did, the key point was that it was very unprofessional. If your name in the movies that you enjoyed, and someone that you don’t love as an actor is in it but you still enjoy the movie that’s all that you were being asked. What movies did you like, you could have left it there. Hello good morning good morning I mean it’s okay so far

  5. ThatGirlThere says:

    I think because Dano doesn’t have classic movie star looks and IS so damn talente, Quinton is talented. I remember George Clooney talking about how Quentin Tarantino approached him about Dusk Till Dawn, and how QT said he wanted to cast him as his brother because they looked alike.

    I’m not a Clooney fan, but he was definitely a looker back in the day. It’s hard to imagine anyone thinking he and Quentin Tarantino looked similar, though! Quentin is delusional and a haterrrr.

    • Kitten says:

      Dano was a really cute teen when he starred in L.I.E. I had a crush on him back in the day. Sometimes these child actors age out of their good looks like Edward Furlong. But unlike Furlong, Dano has the tenacity, talent, discipline and range required to have a lasting career in Hollywood. It’s crazy to describe him as “weak” or “uninteresting” when he’s quite the opposite.

    • Thinking says:

      He thought he looked like Facts of Life Clooney and ER Clooney? That’s interesting…

  6. Lens says:

    I’m sure QT has been hurt by being called out in everything he’s “acted” in as sucking hard. But so random: Paul Dano, Owen Wilson (who seems to pay himself over and over but so did Gary Cooper) and Matthew Lillard (REALLY random). QT only hurt his own reputation as a serious filmmaker by doing that. Thank goodness for small favors he didn’t go after actresses (this time anyway).

    • Happy Peregrine says:

      I feel like QT’s creative spirit died in the 00’s and it shows. No recent movies. And Matthew lillard?!?

  7. Sue says:

    I just remembered how much I liked Paul as young Brian Wilson in Love and Mercy.

  8. Eleonor says:

    I mean sharing a scene with DDL…
    That speaks by itself.

  9. Tiffany says:

    I think Toes said what he said about Paul because Paul in laws are the Kazan’s, as Toes idolized Elia. Toes is jelly he doesn’t have a HW royalty relationship.

    • Anne Maria says:

      Elia Kazan was a great film maker but went out of his way to cooperate with the House UnAmerican Activities ‘reds under the beds’ witch-hunt. That ruined the careers of quite a few, including Leo Penn, Sean’s father, and unsurprisingly Sean did not stand when the Oscars honoured Kazan some years ago. But that’s not the fault of any present day Kazans, Paul Dano and Zoe are a talented – and cute – couple and Tarantino is another example of a great film maker not necessarily being a great human.

  10. Aimee says:

    I’m not a fan of any of the actors Tarantino mentioned but what he said was so rude and uncalled for.

  11. Beech says:

    Paul Dano did two films with DDL. The first one was The Ballad of Jack and Rose and the second one . . .

  12. Auntie Fah says:

    Paul Dano was beyond excellent in LMS and Ruby Sparks, which is a brillaint film his partner, Zoe Kazan, wrote. If you’re a fan and haven’t seen it, look it up.
    QT is a marginally talented clown whose early (and overblown) success went to his head. He believed his own hype and is highly overrated. Sucks to be him if he has to attack talented people to make headlines.

  13. Snarkle says:

    I like Kaisers take and agree – all 3 actors he slammed are people he would have auditioned against for roles based on that loser/funny vibe. Jealousy.

    I will say that when his first couple scripts hit Hollywood it was lighting. I was a peon in the industry and even I heard about them and got my hands on one. EVERYOnE knew his name and wanted to work with him- even before reservation dogs and pulp fiction came out. So there was a period of time where he wasn’t overrated. But then, to use his own language, he limp-dicked the rest of his career into being a parody of himself

    • CheekImplant says:

      Exactly. QT is a one trick pony.
      He also reveres over the top leading man performances, so he probably doesn’t “get” the understated acting skills that Dano has exhibited. Matthew Lillard is capable of that as well.
      Owen Wilson is not a good actor at all. I don’t get the Wilson brothers shtick at all. But QT is likely jealous that Owen has had a long career despite his limited acting range.

  14. Clarice McClellan says:

    Why is Matthew Lillard out here catching strays? I will go to bat for him. He is incredibily talented and an underrated actor. (And, come tf on. Paul Dano is brilliant and has been since he forever. The only weak sauce here is QT.)

  15. Starla dear says:

    In my junior high school drama class, my teacher once read a quote that has always stuck with me: “a critic is a person who knows the way but can’t drive the car”.

  16. monica says:

    Paul Dano is inadvertently the reason I got back with my now-husband! We were dating in high school and beyond ( me and now-husband, not Paul Dano) and then broke up. I was in my late twenties when Little Miss Sunshine came out and I LOVED the movie so much. Paul reminded me so much of my ex that I ended up Facebook-messaging him in a fit of raging nostalgia. And now, here we are, all these years (20!) later, with three kids and a good life. Paul is a fantastic actor and QT can suck eggs. There’s enough meanness in the world already.

  17. Pizza says:

    Wow, really sexist language from QT. What a vicious, cruel attack. And I agree I thought Paul Dano was good in TWBB and is good in all of his roles.

    On the other hand, what about QT’s attempt at playing an Australian in Djano? Hahahahaha. Horrible acting and atrocious accent (I grew up in Australia).

  18. Stacey Dresden says:

    Paul Dano is a hell of an actor. WTF is he on

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment