Eden: Key Labour ministers are trying to bring the Sussexes back to the UK!!

The funniest part about the years-long speculation about Prince Harry’s “return to the UK” is that there’s a growing body of evidence that powerful figures in the British establishment actually want the Sussexes to come back, permanently or semi-permanently. Half of the speculation isn’t even about whatever Harry or Meghan are doing or saying. It’s about what other people are arguing on their behalf. Even back in 2020, there were British politicians, royalists and cultural figures who said publicly and privately that the Sussexit was bad, actually, and that the Windsors should find a way to bring Harry and Meghan back in some way. Obviously, this has reached a crescendo this week alongside the news that the Home Office has decided to do a security risk assessment for the Sussexes. If the Home Office and Ravec determine that the Sussexes should have security on-demand in the UK, then that’s a vital part of the “establishment plot to bring back the Sussexes.” So says Richard Eden at the Mail. Here’s an excerpt from his latest column:

The decision to carry out a new risk assessment is all the more striking because the legal position, upheld by the Court of Appeal, has not changed: the process does not apply to Harry and Meghan because they live overseas. What has changed, I can reveal, is that the ‘Establishment plot’ which aims to restore the California-based couple to the affections of the British public is gathering pace and has powerful supporters.

The plot is known as ‘Project Thaw’ because the aim is to ‘warm up’ the duke’s and duchess’s frosty relationships with the rest of the Royal Family and with the British people. As I wrote in September: ‘Worryingly, King Charles has been drawn into this, aided by some key figures of the Establishment behind the scenes.’

Those key figures include senior Government ministers such as David Lammy, the Justice Secretary, and Yvette Cooper, the Foreign Secretary, who travelled on the same train as Harry to the Ukrainian capital Kyiv when he visited the war-torn country in September.

Ms Cooper is said to be among the Establishment figures who admire the duke and want him to play a bigger part in public life. She is married to Ed Balls, former Cabinet minister in the Blair administration and now a host of Good Morning Britain, the ‘woke’ ITV breakfast show from which Piers Morgan resigned after Meghan complained to his bosses about critical comments he made on the programme. She is also said to be one of the senior Labour Party figures keen for Harry and Meghan to reconcile with the Royal Family. Many on the Left hailed the mixed-race American actress as a symbol of change in the Monarchy when she married Harry in 2018 – and still yearn for her return.

My sources say the new risk assessment could result in taxpayer-funded police protection being restored to the Sussexes. And the explanation will be that Harry and his family plan to spend much more time in Britain than previously. As a friend of the duke’s told me in September: ‘Harry wants to educate the children here in the UK.’

The friend who discussed the subject with the duke during his visit to Britain that month, explained: ‘Harry feels his children are missing out on the extensive family network that their niece and nephews are enjoying. Harry wants his children to have the very best education. He has retained his closest friendship group of confidants from his days at school at Ludgrove and Eton. He wants that for his own children.’

If the new risk assessment does result in police protection being restored to Harry and Meghan, there would be fury from taxpayers, I believe. It would also be a highly dangerous move for the future of the Monarchy. Just when Left-wing Labour MPs are rubbing their hands with glee at the review of Crown Estate properties and the favourable terms given to members of the Royal Family, Harry and Meghan would be free to come and go at leisure – at a considerable cost to the Exchequer. This is something that the increasingly influential Republican Left would relish. It must not happen.

[From The Daily Mail]

All of the casual assumptions… if the risk assessment finds that the Sussexes should get security, I guess they really believe that Harry and Meghan will pack up their kids and bring them straight to London? Yeah, I doubt that’s happening. I’ve never believed the British education stuff either. But all of the stuff about the Starmer government officials advocating for the Sussexes’ return is fascinating and hilarious. The Scooter King is going to have another nervous breakdown over that. Hell, even Boris Johnson went on the record about how much he liked Harry and Meghan and thought they were a national asset. William’s big play to exile his more charismatic brother has blown up in his face so spectacularly. It’s beautiful.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

62 Responses to “Eden: Key Labour ministers are trying to bring the Sussexes back to the UK!!”

  1. Snuffles says:

    The government wants their national asset back. Not The Firm. They know Willy ain’t shit.

    At bare minimum they are clearing the way the Invictus Games. Harry and Meghan will never move back permanently but Harry definitely wants to visit freely.

    • Smart&Messy says:

      I agree that it is, as of now, about the IG events. The govt saw full well tge attention and respect IG has gotten from governments, heads of state, nato and the public in general. If the RF makes it about their pathetic soap opera, it’s 1, a national embarrasment on the world stage, 2, it’s the monarch and rf refusing to do their actual job.

      In the long run, I don’t know how much the current govt cares about the commonwealth and the adventageous ties it might bring after Brexit, but as you said, Willy ain’t sh!t and they know it. The rest of the left behinds the same. Their only chance to even try to salvage some benefits of the commonwealth is if H and M agree to lead that charge. Even if they do that living in Ca but representing the UK. H and M doesn’t owe the UK shit, but I can see that as an angle in trying to bring them back.

      • Beth says:

        Sussex-haters can’t have it all ways here in the UK. They rejoiced when a judge said ‘no’ to Harry asking to pay to save taxpayers’ money. Now Eden says they’ll be furious if his automatic protective security is restored at cost to taxpayers (which others get, including current and former public figures deemed eligible) 🤡

    • Becks1 says:

      I think this is about Invictus in large part, and I also think its about a growing concern about William as monarch. He’s extremely lazy (its starting to feel like he has to be bribed with beer to work), he’s constantly angry, he’s entitled, he’s privacy obsessed in a way that borders on paranoia, and he refuses to take any advice if its not what he wants to hear.

      Who would want that for a head of state? I know many will say “well that sounds like Trump” and they wouldn’t be wrong, which is why as an american I can say you DONT want someone like that for a head of state.

      I think government leaders are very very worried about William becoming king and they’re hoping a more visible Harry will soften the blow. That was always the plan, right?

      • Douches Of Cambridge says:

        I agree this will be framed for and about Invictus, but in the backhand they know this is to encourage the relationship between the members of family. Scooter king and lazy queen will be incandescent either way rage, jealousy and lack of confidence as they will watch the huge welcoming and success to invictus compared to their non existent work.

      • Mac says:

        Trump and William are in no way alike.

        Trump is a deeply corrupt fascist dictator wannabe with the full force of the US budget and military behind him. William is a spoiled brat with no political power who resents having to work for the millions of dollars handed to him by virtue of his birth.

      • Not A Subject says:

        William doesn’t read or know anything. He barely passed his art history classes. Couldnt be bothered to learn Welsh (prince of wales ummm). He skipped the pope’s funeral for a soccer game. Trump’s narcissism prevents him from being lazy (he’s a shark, dumb but always doing something). Lil Willie is idle. His only purpose is competing with his brother.

      • Me at home says:

        You know, we never hear any more about William’s attempts to take over Invictus. And thank God for that. Did it peter out when William’s obvious and ham-handed attempt to take over and/or torpedo Sentebale turned into a circus around the craziness from Sentebale’s CEO?

      • FrenchLadyJuliet says:

        Despite the media (mostly right-wing) constantly propping up W&K, it’s evident that behind the scenes there’s A LOT of talk about William’s character and lack of work ethics, as well as Catherine’s limits.

        Oh I would LOVE to have some “leaking” about what is said behind the scenes… Rob Johnson gave us a few hints…

      • Becks1 says:

        @mac read what I said about their personalities. They’re a lot more alike than some might like to admit.

      • Smatone99 says:

        To French lady Juliet there’s not a mechanism for willy to ‘take over’ invictus, regardless of what the fail says. Sentebale was so small and one currupt person torpedoed it. Invictus is entirely different. I know a lot of people on here have said William will take over invictus – watch out Harry you’re getting played etc. I’ve never seen a single explanation as to how? Not once.

  2. CM says:

    If Harry decides his wife and children have enough security to safely visit the UK then it will be on their own terms and they will be the ones calling all the shots – which I love for them. 👏🏼

    • SarahLee says:

      Totally agree with you. I am certain that Harry does want his children – a prince and princess, mind you – to know their “realm” and their heritage. I could even see them getting a small place to base themselves when they are visiting (Charles should just give them back Frogmore Cottage). Harry is content to come in and out and stay different places, but I doubt he will want that for the family. Bill and Can’t must be shaking in their plush boots.

      • HuffnPuff says:

        I think the Wales’ were informed that the Sussexes will get protection approved this time and that’s why they hastily moved into Forest Lodge and took all that acreage. They want to make sure they have a way to keep the Sussexes away from them. I’m assuming Adelaide was more of an easy access for visitors once they were inside the compound.

      • Gabby says:

        “They want to make sure they have a way to keep the Sussexes away from them.”
        What fools! The Sussexes will stay away from WanK on their own volition. It’s not like they wish they could hang out with William and Kate.

      • jais says:

        Okay, yeah, I’m laughing. The Sussexes would be staying far away. And that’s assuming they would stay in Windsor. That said, I can believe the Wales are fragile enough to not want to even accidentally run into them in Windsor, lol.

  3. LADY DIGBY says:

    This is desperate stuff: Harry and Meg and the kids aren’t returning to live here. Yes it is increasingly obvious that Will needs to be shored up with recruitment of his cousins to carry out bread and butter engagements. Will is determined to become King with minimum impact on his private life . For whatever reason he is only willing to carry out say 180 engagements per year which is quite a shortfall given previous two monarchs would carry out 500 engagements a year. Harry and Meg aren’t going to race to the rescue. If Will and Kate are in need of additional help then other family members can be recruited.

    • Ash says:

      180 is too generous.

    • Lili says:

      Haven’t they heard of cutting the workload, high numbers are great to brag about but what about the impact, we have read having a royal patron is not all its cracked up to be so reduce the number of charities and focus on a small number and make a difference.

      • Lady Digby says:

        @Lili agreed impact and substantial support is better than just a twenty minute, empty handed visit to a foodbank for example.

      • Me at home says:

        The report that found royal patronage wasn’t very helpful connected that finding to the fact that the royals rarely visit their patronages. QEII had over 500 patronages but even she couldn’t visit them all every year.

        William does visit a few of his charities fairly frequently, even if it’s mostly just to eat a cake baked for him by a homeless shelter. Most of William’s “engagements” are actually short videos and things like fancy cape ceremonies and drinking beer with the military, not charities. And Kate has just 10-12 patronages and can’t even manage to visit most of them every year, go figure.

  4. Dee(2) says:

    Again, Harry grew up in the UK, went to school there, and served in the British Army for 10 years. He works with various philanthropic organizations that are based in the UK. He has friends that live in the UK, and family members other than the ones that appear on that balcony that do as well. Of course he wants to come back, and bring his wife and children. And of course, he wants them to feel safe and be safe while doing so.

    But this idea that the only way that his children will make friends and be happy, is if they live in the UK is nonsense. Meghan has an incredibly close, loyal, dedicated friend group doesn’t she? I guess that doesn’t count. Just like Meghan’s extended family that rightfully stays out of the news, doesn’t count either. Only Harry’s country, friends, family, and educational experience matters. And I’ll be honest, I ride for Harry and Meghan truly, but the issues that are calling more attention to the need and relevancy of the monarchy can not be saved by them. In fact, it’s probably the best thing for them that they are separate financially and publicly from them.

    • Lili says:

      the fundamental infrastructure is broken, hailing Harry and Meghan as the ones to bail the water out of the sinking ship means they don’t realise the boat is sinking and want to put a nice facade on it then turn around and blame them for trying to make an effort.

    • Beff says:

      What will really make this interesting is if Charles passes prior to IG. I do not believe Harry wants to move back or educate the children in GB. I could see them purchasing a flat in London to use when he is in England for charitable endeavors.

      • Mac says:

        There are many exclusive private schools in the US on par with Eton and many are co-ed so the kids can go to the same school.

  5. Sunniside up says:

    The first thing the government has to do if they are ever going to get them back is to put a stop to the hate campaign by William and the tabloid press, and stop the better press from lazily copying the Tabs.

  6. Julia says:

    The school thing is hilarious because it’s obvious from Spare that Harry hated Eton. He often says that Meghan is better educated than him and she educated entirely in the US. These weirdos and their ‘plots’ are baffling. They must be bored!

    • Random42 says:

      That’s what I thought as well. Meghan attended Northwestern and a catholic school. I think she will also take the lead when it comes down to what school the children will attend. I’m not saying that Harry doesn’t have a voice but he did have a very negative expierence at Eton. Meghan will can navigate the American educational system much better. Harry was only told what school he will attend – that’s it. The Sussex kids will have options.

      I also think that neither Charles nor Diana were very involved. You would think that paying high tution would insure that your children are taken care of regarding their talents. Meghan and Harry will be more involved in the education of the Sussex tots. Good for them.

      • Darkwing Duck says:

        I think Charles selected Eton for his sons because he didn’t get to go there tbh. I don’t think that there is a tradition of attending? I think they used to use private tutors before Charles and his siblings were sent to boarding school (Gordonstoun for the boys and Benenden for Anne)

      • Tessa says:

        Diana did not want harry to go to eton. She was right considering how scooter told harry to pretend he does not know him

      • Sunniside up says:

        The late Queen was educated at home, by a governess, but after Edward VIII threw up the job they bought in a tutor from Eton to teach her about things like the constitution and politics, the sort of things she needed to know to do the job, I’ve not heard of anything like that for William.

      • windyriver says:

        Will had done the same thing to Harry at Ludgrove, so at least Harry wouldn’t have been surprised when he got to Eton. He talked about it in one of the documentaries (about Charles?) some years back, looking through photo albums with Will sitting right next to him. Said how excited he was for Ludgrove because he had a big brother there, and Will totally ignored him when he got there.

      • Mac says:

        It would be hilarious if they chose a Catholic school. It drive the BRF and rota rats over the edge.

    • Gail says:

      @Tessa
      My older sister said the same thing to me. 1968~ It was my first day in high school (Quebec’s Grade 8) and I was lost, and late. My relief at seeing my sister at the end of the hallway, filled me with gratefulness. Even though she was with two boys. As I approached, she turned her back on me. I thought she hadn’t seen me. Running up, Help me Sister please and she hissed back you don’t know me, I don’t know you, don’t speak to me in school ever…Crushed, I turned away, swallowing tears. My point being, this is one thing i do not blame William for. Because I think it’s a sibling thing, not specifically a William thing. Or maybe because the four of us (Wm & H and my sister and self) had poor parenting… hard to know…

      • Andrea says:

        I don’t think it’s a sibling thing. I went to school with my siblings and every friend I had in school had their siblings there as well. No one ever treated their siblings this way. Not one.

  7. Hypocrisy says:

    Eden saying they are calling it “Project Thaw” just made me laugh..

  8. Maxine Branch says:

    Eden just makes up mess for content. Most know the Sussexes are not coming back. However, they deserve the right to visit Harry’s birth country at will. Inserting supposed taxpayer rage with the cost of their security is just nonsense because they never should have lost it, especially since it has been documented it is needed for safety.

    • Melissa says:

      Yes! He’s turning a simple security issue into a taxpayer-rage fantasy, as if giving them protection would drain everyone’s wallets and throw the Monarchy into crisis.

  9. Miranda says:

    I don’t know, to me, I wouldn’t look at Harry and Meghan’s success and thinking, “OK, how do we get them back?” I would be thinking, “wow, they’re making their own way on their own dime. Why are we paying millions for the others to wear designer clothes, move house every few months, and occasionally shake hands with pensioners when they can squeeze in time between their half dozen annual vacations?”

  10. NoBS Please says:

    This entire storyline is nonsensical and I don’t believe it for a second.

    I simply don’t buy that the Labour government are interested in spending any political capital on the Sussexes, and thereby giving the overwhelmingly right-wing/far right British media a new stick with which to beat them. You can sense them sharpening their pick-axes already.

    It’s more likely that the British media are DESPERATE to have Harry and Meghan back so they can torment them at will, but as they don’t want to admit it, are trying to dream up other potential protagonists to point the finger to.

    What I do believe is that there are some government ministers (armed forces, home office) who are looking to Invictus running smoothly and drama-free in 2027, so are taking the small steps needed to enable Harry, his wife and possibly his kids to visit safely. They may also be looking to facilitate KC seeing them before he croaks. Both of which are sensible things for the Labour government to be doing.

    Anything else I don’t believe. Not in the slightest.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Exactly.

    • jais says:

      The BM is desperate. And while I’m sure portions of it would like to torture the Sussexes, I think it might be the opposite. The BM is annoyed enough with William that they probably relish the idea of him being tortured just by a few sussex visits a year. It’ll get him doing more too! And yeah idk that it’s the government so much as Charles making an about face in terms of Harry’s security. But they can’t say that bc they claimed the king has nothing to do with whether they have security or not.

  11. I guess the British government knows that the Sussexes are good for them and want them back. They see the good the Sussexes do and what little the leftovers do and so they want the good ones back. Guess the British government has decided that if there is to be a monarchy it must include the Sussexes lol. Yes i am sure that Pegs head will explode!!

  12. Mads says:

    I suspect that the review is only going ahead because the Home Office has been given permission by the palace to do so and, therefore, I’m expecting it to be decided in favour of Harry automatically being assigned security when he comes back to visit the UK.

    • jais says:

      This. Saying it’s bc of the government is just a way of distracting from the fact that it’s always been about the king’s favor.

  13. Jais says:

    So many funny details. I’ve seen clips of the ITV morning show and it’s never struck me as particularly woke. And no, the Republican movement in the uk isn’t going to get stronger just bc Harry gets security every now and then. Please.

  14. Heather says:

    Richard Eden has no sources. They are all made up. All of his articles are based on his speculations. So far nothing he has written has proven to be of any value.

  15. Tina says:

    I do think there are lots of people in the government and even in the monarchy (not William and KP of course) who would like to move on from this saga and realize that this drama actually hurts the BRF more than it does Harry and Meghan at this point. The last couple of years have made it clear that the Sussexes are happy, wealthy, connected and not coming back. Globally they get so much more interest and attention than the BrF. They also are much more visible these days at the same time as William and Kate are doing less and less. I’m sure people have noticed that and see it for the problem that it is. Invictus would made a great start for the cooling of tensions and I’m sure the government and MoD does not want a global embarrassment on their hands if the event is hijacked by royal nonsense. But at this point I don’t think the royals and the press can shift gears so I don’t really think we will see any change.

    • ShazBot says:

      This is it. The grown ups in the room know that it’s a terrible look that Harry and Meghan have been THE main characters for the past 6 years in the UK, and in that time the Queen has died, there’s a new King, and there have been 2 major illnesses in the family (ostensibly). And yet, anything to do with Harry and Meghan has been and is still always top of line.

      It’s ridiculous and for the RFs sake, it needs to stop. They don’t need to bring them back, they just need a thaw where everyone moves on with their lives and there is no drama around visits. I don’t know how you get the heir into therapy though, because that is a critical factor in all of this.

    • Shonda says:

      I agree with you Tina.

    • Gail says:

      “They also are much more visible these days at the same time as William and Kate are doing less and less.”
      It’s a vicious circle now. W&K are doing less and less because every time they do something, there’s nothing there. No substance. So they go into hiding because the comparisons are brutal. That it’s their own fault is moot at this stage of the game. They want H&M back to do the work so the odd occasion when W&K show up, everyone will be in awe. At least, this seems to be the thinking on some days. On other days, W just wants to be a regular Joe. He cannot be both. He needs H&M back to work & being seen regularly so there’s value, shock and awe for him showing up maybe once or twice a year. The rest of the time, they can remain in hiding and let H&M do all the work. It’s a theory…..

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Gail, I think you forgot the single most important aspect of this for WanK: HMAL would be scapegoats. WanK and children can slide through doing whatever they want, because all of the negativity would be focused on the Sussexes. That would be the only reason anyone in the brf would want them back IMO.

  16. Amy Bee says:

    Richard Eden is deluded and unhinged.

  17. QuiteContrary says:

    Poor Richard sounds like he’s having a nervous breakdown. He and Willy should get together to commiserate and whine about the prospect of the Sussexes spending more time in England.

    I don’t think H&M would ever return to England full-time … the life they’ve built in Montecito is too wonderful.

    But I could see the British government wanting to use Harry as a diplomatic asset, given that William is so inept at diplomacy.

  18. one of the marys says:

    Project thaw does not need to include restoring Harry’s reputation with the public. The British public come out in droves for him at every opportunity. It’s all about his relationship with Charles and William, that’s it. If there truly is a project thaw its goal is to get Charles and William out of the way ahead of the IG. My God William is awful

  19. Elly says:

    I think the BM wants more access to the Sussexes make more money off of negative “stories” and that’s why they want them back. I can imagine that just visiting the UK would be triggering for Meghan. Does anyone believe she would want her kids exposed to that abuse? I think H&M would want their kids to go to school in their community and visit (with security) the UK during holidays and summer vacation. US schools are ranked just as high as UK’s. To me, the whole idea of boarding school seems like a bad idea. It just doesn’t seem like a balanced life for kids. Hasn’t Eton had scandals with some teachers sexually abusing kids? Why would anyone want their children to be vulnerable to possible abuse from other kids and teachers? I think parents should be available to support their children and supervise their activities.

  20. tamsin says:

    “Many on the Left hailed the mixed-race American actress as a symbol of change in the Monarchy when she married Harry in 2018 – and still yearn for her return.” OMG if that sentence doesn’t say it all for the classist racist misogynist part of the UK. That statement is so disrespectful it is equivalent to spitting at Meghan, equivalent to the statement of the creature who wanted feces thrown at her. It looks to me like this whole thing is about Invictus and trying to get ahead of any stupidity that William might try to pull. I don’t see Charles doing much to sabotage it perhaps, except not attending, if he is indeed still alive by then. Obviously, Harry is entitled to full security during the event, as he has been given at all other venues for the Games so far. And the British veterans deserve a well run Invictus Games unmarred by Windsor pettiness. How can they not realize that the BM makes the Windsors look like petty jealous cretins to the thinking world. I think Meghan might come for a day or two, but not the children because they would be a distraction. Also, I shouldn’t think that Harry and Meghan would want to expose them to the current climate in the UK.

  21. Beverley says:

    What would they offer Harry to be the shadow king? More articles about how miserable and dumb he is? More racial abuse aimed at his wife? More comparisons to apes aimed at his children? More nitpicking, bigotry, and lies?

    These stories are rubbish. Either the BM is completely tone deaf and unaware of the racist vitriol they’ve been shoveling at Meghan, or they really truly believe that (despite it all) Harry is dim enough to come back for more. Delusional!

  22. Deborah1 says:

    Piers Morgan didn’t resign from ITV’s Good Morning Britain, he was sacked after he flounced off the set live on air over an argument with weather presenter Alex Beresford who defended Meghan on the show. The video of this altercation is readily available on the Net. It was disgraceful to watch.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment