Byline: Toxic Dan Wootton sexually harassed & bullied coworkers at the Sun

Byline Times released Part 2 of their “three-part exposé” on Dan Wootton on Thursday. Although by Byline’s own admission, they now have so many people coming forward to speak about Wootton’s work conduct, their exposé might end up being much more than a trilogy. Byline’s Part 2 is exclusively about Wootton’s conduct at the Sun, where he worked from 2013 through 2020. He ran the Sun’s Bizarre column, which is the outlet’s signature entertainment/gossip column. But as we saw in real time, Wootton found ways to stretch his purview and, in his final years at the Sun, he was constantly covering the royal beat, politics, major entertainment stories and more. He was not only a writer but an editor with the newspaper, which meant he had a lot of power within the tabloid – power over men and women. He was a terrible boss – he sexually harassed people, he bullied subordinates, he tried to “out” coworkers, he stole coworker’s sources and much, much more. Byline Times reveals that six people received out-of-court settlements from the Sun because of the toxic workplace culture created by Wootton.

Wootton left behind a trail of destruction at the Sun: Byline Times has now spoken to multiple former editorial and support staff at Britain’s biggest tabloid, many of whom are fearful of being identified after their experiences working at Murdoch-owned News UK – with one left suicidal, another suffering stress-induced hair loss, and others deserting the industry. For that reason, we are protecting their identities, although they are known to their former employer which, last night – in response to a request for comment sent by Byline Times – contacted all staff at The Sun, announcing that it was looking into our “allegations urgently”.

Six employees received settlements after complaining about Wootton’s bullying & harassment: In one of the cases, a very senior member of The Sun team took a kitchen knife to a meeting with a former editor of the newspaper with the intention of slitting their own wrists in front of the executive, who had sided with Wootton in a dispute ultimately settled for a six-figure sum. The Sun made the pay-out at the eleventh hour ‘at the steps’ of an employment tribunal in 2018, at which emails from Wootton disclosed to the employee’s lawyers would have entered the public record and led to judicial findings of fact.

Sexual harassment: Former staff have told Byline Times’ investigators how Wootton “continually tried to make people admit they were bisexual or gay – he challenged people on their sexual orientation all the time”. Several sources have spoken of the sexual harassment of male colleagues, while at least two female colleagues were reduced to tears daily by his conduct. Naming three particular targets of “very inappropriate behaviour”, they said: “He sexually harassed these male colleagues all the time. One would come in and Dan would often comment on the way he looked and goad him, saying ‘are you sure you want to be married? We all know you’re gay’. He was pressurising them to turn [gay] and acting like it was a joke but people – men, women, everyone who heard – were visibly uncomfortable especially as it was coming from a boss.”

Wootton controlled the payment system for sources: The staffer said: “It was ridiculously stressful. He was constantly condescending and sarcastic. Diaries of his behaviour were kept – the things he was doing. As the boss, he had control over the company payment system. He would sabotage other journalists. He would go into the payment system and find out the names of contacts. He would then get in touch with them himself and make them deal with him directly. It was impossible to do your job. The most valuable thing a journalist has are their contacts. They are our stock in trade. It was a classic campaign of constructive dismissal. He knew what he was doing.”

Everything changed when the Sun brought in the current editor, Victoria Newton: In February 2020, on her first day in the role, Wootton left Newton furious by “demanding” she promote him, prompting a “cute” move by the new editor, who reached out to Wootton’s “best remaining royal contact” and placed them on a special retainer ensuring that they dealt exclusively with her. A source said: “This was the beginning of the end for Dan at The Sun. He didn’t like having the same move pulled on him that he had done to so many contacts of other people.” Less than a year later, Wootton left News UK for his current position at GB News.

[From Byline Times]

“The new editor… reached out to Wootton’s ‘best remaining royal contact’ and placed them on a special retainer ensuring that they dealt exclusively with her.” Meaning Wootton had been paying a royal contact for some time, then Victoria Newton went behind Wootton’s back, and put that royal contact on retainer, dealing with her exclusively? If the royal contact actually works in, say, Kensington Palace, this is not only unacceptable and unethical, it’s against the law. Note the timing too – February 2020, weeks after Wootton broke the Sussexit story in January of that year. And months after Newton defanged Wootton, the Sun then gave a seven-figure secret settlement to Prince William. In 2019, Wootton was also the one to break the infamous “rural rival” story.

Remember Prince William’s former private secretary Christian Jones? He suddenly resigned in early 2021, after many, many rumors about his connections to Dan Wootton?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, GB News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

92 Responses to “Byline: Toxic Dan Wootton sexually harassed & bullied coworkers at the Sun”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. girl_ninja says:

    Bring it all to the light! His corrupt ass has to be exposed and so does Willy’s and whatever royal was I. Cahoots with Dan.

  2. Chaine says:

    I was thinking maybe the royal contact referenced was that Angela Kelly

  3. Mei says:

    He’s deplorable, and it sounded like an absolutely awful place to work when he was in charge. I am looking forward to alllllll these chickens coming home to roost. The Scum is still utter trash, but I’m happy to see that more people may be waking up to horrible people and methods behind the ‘reporting’ tactics of theirs, and other tabloids.

    • ML says:

      To add to what you said, Mei, at the bottom of the Byline Times article, there’s this: “Dan Evans and Tom Latchem are former colleagues of Dan Wootton’s from the News of the World. None of the sources in this investigation were paid for their testimony”
      Former colleagues? Who have spent years going after Dan Wootton? Oh really… May they succeed in taking him down.

  4. Anna says:

    There’s a special place in hell for horrible bosses.

    With all this coming out, I hope Dan gets the life he deserves.

  5. Jais says:

    This is all so twisted. But this story is exactly the kind that the tabloids love to splash all over their papers. And yet, they’re silent on all these juicy and lascivious details. Coincidence, obviously not.

    • BeanieBean says:

      We’re getting an insight into how they produce such horrible content. Their workplace is a hellscape.

    • Agreatreckonng says:

      The BM/BRF are so friggin twisted. Seriously. The collective of the BM were decrying of anything about innocent Meghan. Avocadoes, nail polish, closing her own door, not wearing a hat, not wearing hosiery, cupping her pregnant belly, maybe stepping one foot forward of Harry (though it’s now acceptable that Kate leads the charge), Meghan was too Hollywood, though the BRF completely loves being in Hollywood limelight- William’s f*cking velveteen shoes at that Top Gun premier.

      But, talking about Dan Wootton’s depravity is hands off for the British Media. You know Dan Wootton is guilty as sh*t when Nile Gardiner is speaking out on his behalf.

  6. Brassy Rebel says:

    Call me naive. (I probably am!) But are sources routinely paid in British journalism because this is a big no-no in the States. This account makes it sound like the tabs, at least, have a whole system in place for compensating sources.

    • MSTJ says:

      I think tabloids like the Enquirer and others pay people in the US for information but reputable media such as NYT, WP, and others do not. In the US there is a separation of tabloid media and non-tabloid. In the UK, I don’t believe there is or see a clear separation with their mainstream media publications based on the content and the format of the coverage. The coverage is mostly tabloid driven client journalism in support of the government and royal family agendas.

      • Jessica says:

        The UK press has a very clear and distinct delineation between tabloids and what used to be referred to as ‘broadsheets’, newspapers in large format. The Guardian, The Times, The Telegraph, Financial Times etc are all very much serious and thorough long form reporting.

        They may not be discussed here often as this is a gossip site, but they very much exist and have existed for as long as print media has.

      • Jais says:

        And yet, at this point, the broadsheets are still infected by the tabloid culture that runs the UK. Murdoch owns The Times. They write about royalty through Valentine Low and Royah Nikkah and show no more journalistic integrity despite being a broadsheet. And then there’s the Telegraph which is apparently a broadsheet or paper of record which is hilarious. The entire media culture in the uk is at very low levels and very much influenced by tabloids and the news barons that run them. Not to say the us doesn’t have media issues. It does. But the uk has very distinct media issues and it’s due to the intertwining of the tabloids and government and the royals.

    • The Hench says:

      The tabloids routinely pay for stories. That’s often how they get them. The Profumo affair came out when Christine Keeler needed money and went to the papers.
      Our own Police are known to sell info to the tabloids to supplement their income.
      Basically, it’s rife.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        My gawd, the entire country is corrupt!!!

        From the BRF’s “influence” over Parliament members in certifying that BRF be exempt from paying their fair share on taxes to the police officers taking money to “supplement” their income by giving private details of those involved within them!!!

        This certainly adds credence to those that were harmed in the July 2005 bombing that took place as I mentioned an article a few days ago!!! The Britshidmedia were stalking the poor victims, along with family/friends, that luckily survived.

        Burn it ALL down 🔥🔥🔥

  7. Miranda says:

    It does not surprise me at all that this entitled, petty little shit has never grown out of that phase that many gay/bi guys go through in high school or college, insisting that everybody is secretly gay and thus up for (sometimes literal) grabs.

    It pisses me off so much to see gay men behaving like this, feeding into the myth of “gay recruitment”. It may sound somewhat trivial, just a minor nuisance, but in this current climate of increasingly virulent homo/transphobia, even little things like this have the potential to cause great harm.

  8. MSTJ says:

    Prince Harry was right about the media and its associations with the palace. I’m glad he pulled back the curtains and helped us to see beyond the veil.

    I’m glad he got himself and his family out of that toxic royal institution and out of the UK. I pray he and the other claimants in the cases against the media are successful and the exposure of media impropriety results in improving regulation of press and ethics in journalism throughout the UK media.

    Dan Wooton’s actions reflect an appetite within the media for power, manipulation and racketeering in media that I frankly believe is enabled by the government and the royal family who accept the behavior par for the course in England. The king, Charles III even implored his son to go along with the status quo as revealed in Spare. Disappointing, disgusting, reprehensible.

    I will close with Prince Harry’s statement in court from the MGN trial: “In my view, in order to save journalism as a profession, journalists need to expose those people in the media that have stolen or highjacked the privileges and powers of the press, and have used illegal or unlawful means for their own gain and agendas.”

  9. Dee(2) says:

    I remember Harry saying in Spare that he told William that someone in his office was leaking false information to the newspapers, and William said he would ” look into it”. If he did look into it he didn’t do anything about it, and if he didn’t look into it it’s probably because he already knew who it was and what they were leaking and was perfectly happy with it. All this stuff has very obvious connections and the fact that people are still trying to give the benefit of the doubt to the Wales astounds me. They are horrible coworkers and family members.

  10. Amy Bee says:

    Emily Andrews left the Sun soon after Wootton started getting royal scoops. I’ll say no more.

    • Becks1 says:

      I think he definitely stole her contacts the way this article describes it, and I also wouldn’t be surprised if he was bullying her as well. I wonder if she is one of the sources for Byline.

      • Amy Bee says:

        Reading the piece she kept coming to mind. I think she is one of the sources.

      • Nic919 says:

        I think she ended up showing the receipts for the cash to pay the boyfriend of Christian Jones story. She would have had royal contacts herself to get that story out, even if woo woo tried to steal them from her.

  11. Harper says:

    Who was the editor before Victoria Newton? Did Danny Boy have dirt on him/her, and is that why he was constantly protected and his victims paid off? It seems like once Newton stepped in Wooten not only lost his top royal contact but he also lost his power. Funny how a year later, he was out and no longer the protected one.

    Wooten drove one woman to suicide and two others to almost the same point (that we know of). Why isn’t Kate taking a closer look at his early years?

    • slippers4life says:

      “Why isn’t Kate taking a closer look at his early years?” I just did a spittake! Bahahahaha

    • Mrazi says:

      @Harper, lmao! You are out of line for that last sentence concerning ‘early years’. That is the comment of the year. Savage!

    • Moxylady says:

      Flipping DEAD!!! Taking a look at his early years. Omggggg 💀💀💀

      • BothSidesNow says:

        Genius on your part @ Harper!!!! Absolutely genius!!!

        BRAVA!!!!! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • Lux says:

      Hilarious, Harper, but we all know the purpose of Kate’s Early Years research is to identify the root cause of Will’s incandescence, and any “scientific findings” will point to how the “stabilizing” Middletons are his only hope for a normal future.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      OMG @Harper. I’m dead. Brilliant comment. Kate should really look into Dan Wootton’s Early Years. So, so funny.

  12. Genevieve says:

    “Diaries of his behaviour were kept – the things he was doing.”

    This is a very intriguing line. At the very least, people were preparing their evidence for some kind of proceeding (which seems borne out by the settlements). But it also kind of looks like a warning that there could be more to come, or there are receipts.

    • seaflower says:

      And their HR Mgr tried to protect him during an investigation. Unbelievable (I’m horrified because I’m ex HR Mgr and I could never imagine compromising my integrity like that0.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      @ Genevieve, apparently these diaries kept by employees would also offer solid timelines, events as well as easily accessible links to the actions taken by DW!

      I do find it the chefs kiss that Newton at the Scum played DW at his own “game” and he became unhinged and chose to leave once his gig was up!! Well done Newton!!

      • SURE says:

        Newton also approved Jeremy Clarkson’s vile article about Meghan as well as the piece on Huw Edwards. She’s almost as despicable as Dan.

  13. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Harry keeps getting proven right. And William keeps looking worse and worse for the company he’s kept and keeps.

    • Mary Pester says:

      @thatsnotok, yes he does, and the only “good thing” about this Is it’s proved it beyond all the doubt the lies the paiace has tried to put out about him. This is perfect for proving how sick not just Wooton and the British media really is, but also what bare faced liars the Royal family are as in “there are no contracts between the press and the Palace” yeah go on you little toads, start Putting out more stories /lies about harry and meghan, but people (courtesy of Wooton no less) are seeing More and more just how twisted you are. Thanks Dan you disgusting man, because you are the march that lit the flame that will burn the whole lot down, Royals, the sun, the mail and the Express.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        Let’s add Murdoch to the mix as well as he was instrumental in creating these guidelines for how these “niche” journalists!! And we mustn’t forget Lord Rothermere either!!!

        I hope that the every owner of these “niche” publications are bankrupted beyond repair so that the future generations are left to fight for crumbs!!!

      • BothSidesNow says:

        As for William he was instrumental in bring the house of cards collapsing with not only Harry’s lawsuit that the judge will release his findings in a few days, but Peg was also the main source of leaking information to the gutter rats as well!! When it wasn’t Peg directly, it was that Knauf the Knife!! It’s glorious to see that Peg gave Wooten the kindling and Wootens own nefarious behaviour is the match that lit the fire!!!

        Burn it ALL down Byline Times!!!

  14. CrazyHeCallsMe says:

    Wow. This gets messier and seedier the more that comes out. I hope Wooten burns for what he’s done. I’m assuming there are NDA’s in place, but I wonder if a class action suit is possible. It sounds like there a multiple victims that Wooten and the tabloids have screwed over.

  15. Shawna says:

    It’s a good thing these stories are coming out, too, because with only the catfishing, it seems like it would be easier from him to slip away from without consequences (?)

  16. K. Tate says:

    What is WRONG with this person? I can not wrap my mind around someone who is just awful all the way around. He’s a cancer.

    • fishface says:

      I know! I have been thinking about this and even though I’m famous for my cynicism, even I am gobsmacked at the degeneracy of this odious little toad. (With apologies to toads).

  17. aquarius64 says:

    KP must b/c shaking in its boots now b/c Bylines may go beyond three parts to take down Dan Rotten. All the vile things William ordered to Harry and Meghan; dollar bet Dan has the receipts plus those on the true state of the Wales marriage. Wotton looks like the type who enjoys having the heir apparent on a lease. If a malicious glorified gossip columnist like Wootton can control the Crown, so can a foreign enemy. Don’t get get too sure of yourself Dan.

    • Mslove says:

      The Crown has become a liability. They are a gullible family susceptible to blackmail, putting the lives of their subjects in danger. Who knows what foreign actors DW is consorting with.

    • Moxylady says:

      Kind of wondering if

      1- Dan is taking the fall for someone higher up. He’s truly awful don’t get me wrong. But …. I think he a Jason K are two peas in a pod. Makes you think.

      2- Dan is going to “fall out of a window”.

      3- Brad Pitt will then blame his business partners in Maravel for pushing Dan out the window.

      4- Christopher Nolan will be furious that things are happening when his movie is out and activate some of his Batman memorabilia and have a full on melt down

      5- William will ask if Brad Pitt wants to come to Earth Shit.

      • Lady D says:

        I think #2. I thought that after he wrote that creepy love letter to William he would be gone. They so deserve each other.

  18. MSTJ says:

    The UK has Rupert Murdoch to thank for breeding the the Dan Wooton types in the media industry. After all Dan did start out at News or the World and moved over the the Sun after the organization was closed down for its criminal activities and unlawful information gathering in journalism. Decades of smut. Every media organization associated with Rupert Murdoch seems to have the similar toxic management culture. Fox News has had to settle numerous harassment cases, some very public ones involved Roger Ailes and Bill O’Rielly.

    I’m so infuriated that Rupert Murdoch and Jonathan Harmsworth/Viscount Rothermere have both enabled Wooton and others they employ destroy and damage lives of so many people with their filth. Would very much like to someday see the end of the smut that comes from their industry and the introduction of ethical journalism in the mainstream UK media.

    I think Byline Times is doing what we would expect to see more of from the UK main stream media. Kudos to them. I hope more grassroots people support them and help them to continue independently delivering proper reporting on issues of interest to the public.

    • Moxylady says:

      Did this come out because of Harry (and others) lawsuits?

      Is Murdoch throwing Dan under the bus?

      Will Dan go nuclear and release all his info?

      Or is he getting an enormous payday to be the “bad apple” ie the ONLY bad apple when the whole tree’s roots are wrapped around toxic waste? Ie toss one to the wolves to protect the rest?

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        This is Bylines and they do old fashioned journalism. What I mean by that is they put a lot of miles on their shoes because they keep looking until they find someone to talk to which may lead to someone else to talk to. They get documents LEGALLY always. They said they’ve been working on this for 3 years (the Guardian said that it had also been investigating this long.) This is how they operate. Once they have enough evidence, that’s when they write the story.

        There’s another story here. The Sun sent out a memo asking people to talk to its attorneys if they had issues. The Sun also said counselling would be available. I smell a rat wanting to get these people to sign NDAs before anyone gets to them. I hope people who were abused by Wootton keep it to themselves and get an attorney. If illegality is involved, I hope they go to the police and report it. Of course, one question I have is whether the Met will do anything. Isn’t there a question that they’ve been compromised?

  19. Ginger says:

    Dan isn’t going down alone. He is going to bring everyone with him and I can’t wait.

    Dan is a horrible and disgusting POS and I hope karma takes care of him. He deserves all of the bad things coming for him.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Yeah, I think I agree with you–he’s not the fall on your sword type, he’ll take down everyone around him.

    • Moxylady says:

      Murdoch doesn’t play. If Dan doesn’t play along and fall on his sword, he should be worried about a “suicide” or accident in his near future.

  20. Ameerah M says:

    Evil little capybara.

    • DeeSea says:

      Nooooooo! The capybara is one of the sweetest, most peaceful animals on the planet! Please don’t malign them like this.

      • Ameerah M says:

        He looks like an evil capybara. I’m sorry. That’s what he looks like. Emphasis on the evil.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      @Ameerah M, did you mean a chupacabra and not capybara?

  21. aquarius64 says:

    I was on Twitter and Bylines is reporting that someone is attempting to hack its files. IT is checking. Also that IT member had blood smeared on his windshield. Both incidents have been reporters to the police. The receipts must be solid. Be safe guys.

    • Mary Pester says:

      Aquarius64, wonder how many I
      T specialists murdoch has? 🤔 I hope Byline find out who it is and publish that name as well, I also hope this makes it’s way to mainstream US media, before bullyams states side visit. They tried yesterday with the “William is snubbing Harry on his US visit, I just find it so funny, because IF anything, it’s Harry snubbing the incandescent one, because he’s now on Harry’s turf!

      • BeanieBean says:

        Really??? William snubbing Harry?? On his trip to NYC, the opposite corner of the US where Harry lives?? Oh, the humanity!

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Mary Pester, fun facts:

        driving distance from Santa Barbara to New York City is 2,881 miles (4637 km)
        distance by plane: 2,517 miles (4051 km)

        Driving most northern Scotland to most southern England : 837 miles (1347 km)
        By plane: 603 miles (970 km)

        I’m not sure how anyone is snubbing someone when you look at the distances involved. The bm have absolutely no idea of the size of the US.

  22. Lady DIGBY says:

    I am sure that Harry’s lawyers will be interested in the claim that the current editor of The Scum has or had a royal contact on salary. Said person could alos have been giving scoops to The Mail and other tabs and getting double bubble from TOB for doing his dirty work. I hope that all this is now unravelled in time to help Harry’s suing of both The Scum and fail.

  23. MSTJ says:

    The more I think of these revelations the more I add up the magnitude of the filth in UK media. So Dan Wooton worked for the Sun and ITV at the same time? Now I think while Dan Wooton worked at ITV News he used information he garnered on Phillip Shofield’s (his colleague) relationship with another employee at ITV causing Phillip to have to out himself on tv ahead of Dan running the story on the Sun a few years ago. I guess that’s why Dan was fired from ITV, contrary to what he was spinning a couple weeks ago when Phillip left ITV. It’s so strange how these people could work for different media organizations (same industry) simultaneously. What the hell? They’re all linked. Lack of independence. One organization runs a story and the others follow. No wonder the work is so shoddy. They are all racing to be first to run the story negating the necessary due diligence for ethical reporting. AND the country is fed the smut day in and day out on tv, print newspapers and online. What a cesspool enabled by the complicity of government and royalty. 🤮 I’d say IMO it’s worse than a banana republic at this point.

    • Tree says:

      When people talk about Philip Schofield they forget to included the grooming. He started grooming the guy when he was underage and then got him a job/internship at the station. Philip was inappropriate. No telling how many times he did that. He made it a point to say he just found out he like guys. I think that was deflection.

  24. Polly says:

    I highly recommend Marina Hyde’s most recent Guardian column about Dan Wootton, it’s a thing of beauty.

    • antipodean says:

      Thanks for that recommendation Polly. I just read her piece and have to say it is so refreshing to know that there are still writers/journalists who can distill the pith of a matter and deliver it…unbiased and well articulated. So rare in this day and age where sensation and lies seem to rule unchecked!

    • Beverley says:

      Yes, Marina Hyde’s piece is indeed a thing of beauty. I hope DW reads it and realizes that this time, he might not get away with his fuckery. Thanks for the recommendation.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      Thanks for the rec!!

    • Eurydice says:

      Awesome piece!

  25. aquarius64 says:

    The Marbles should be scared too because they are Dan’s useful idiots. Especially Scammy. When she was first outed as the biggest Meghan social media troll by Buzzfeed she threatened the writer Ellie Hall she will go to the royal reporters or KP. TOD had implicated Jason the Knife and/or Baldemort. Bad Dad spilled on Australian TV he did Pap gate to help
    stop the wedding. Add in Jr.s “contributions” make them all loose cannons.

  26. AC says:

    I mentioned in my previous comment a day or so ago, no one can get away with anything in the eyes of God. Either it will get back to you when you’re still in this earth or when you leave it. Wooten and his cronies inc the BRF has some sins that they will eventually have to to atone.
    In another note, re Byline Times, I didn’t know John Cleese is a big supporter of this outlet. And I love his opinions!

  27. JP says:

    He’s asking for donations to support his legal battle, lol. What a sad little man.

    • Interested Gawker says:

      The nerve of this guy!! The BRF just got an increase in funds, maybe they’ll toss some his way.🤔

      • I believe he’s literally asking the BRF for funds. He will blackmail and expose their shit if they don’t . He will take everyone down with him. I hope this criminal gets jailed quick,

    • MSTJ says:

      He is trying to suppress the grassroots voices. He’s asking for people to donate £150k instead of using his own money earned from years of smut he peddled. Disgusting. Meanwhile Murdoch asked his employees not to speak with journalists but to instead speak to external lawyers he hired to also suppress others from speaking out publicly. I think they are operating like Russia does to crush small media like Vladimir Putin crushes opposing voices. If people in UK don’t stand up and push back against the big media and their operatives now, they’ll wind up in a dictatorship government where one party in in power for decades and the big media control their country for generations. I do hope Byline Times raises the funds they need through their crowdfunding drive.

      Prince Harry highlighted it in his statement for his MGN court case last month: “Democracy fails when your press fails to scrutinise and hold the government accountable, and instead choose to get into bed with them so they can ensure the status quo.“

      • May says:

        @mstj, yup. I immediately thought of big payouts and non-disclosure agreements when I read that NewsUK wanted anyone affected adversely by Wootton to talk to the attorneys and not journalists! They could be open to liability if it is shown that they buried the complaints about Wootton lodged by the aggrieved.

  28. bisynaptic says:

    Any chance Wootton will bring down the whole rotten establishment, with him? Asking for a friend.

    • slippers4life says:

      Upon reflection I believe one of the following will happen.

      1-he will completely get away with his crimes

      2-he will absolutely try to take everyone down with him and end up like Epstein

  29. Lee says:

    Wotton is scum! Hope he gets destroyed

  30. robin samuels says:

    Dan Wootton is a 40-year-old corporate criminal. In America, his crime is classified as “white collar. “White-collar crimes usually involve massive sums of money. The individuals and businesses linked directly or indirectly to the crime also benefit, so they turn their heads and feign shock when the investigation begins. I’ve witnessed it in living color. The event never makes the news or the papers, and you never see the employee again. Few are as grand as the Bernie Madoff scheme, but they exist.
    The Sun and GMB News knew what Wootton was doing, but they remained silent because his dastardly deeds also put money in their pockets. Dan is to the corporation what a virus is to a computer; everything within the system is impacted at varying degrees. The longer it is allowed to fester, the more severe the damage when the mask falls. The untangling of this web will be interesting because it involves the news media and the Royal family. Parties in both institutions are sitting on red ants, trying not to scream. Let the games begin. I support Bylines. The distraction stories from Air Force One, the Farmer’s Market, etc., will not distract those who understand how this game is played. Dan Wootton is exposed for who and what he truly is.

  31. I pray he gets his time in jail. This man is a maniac.